Prince George Timber Supply Area Timber Supply Review (PG TSA TSR V) Presentation to Prince George City Council June 13, 2016 [email protected] DJA DPG DVA Current AAC: PG TSA • 12.5 million m3/year with a 3.5 million m3/yr partition for non-pine, of which 850,000 m3/yr from Sx leading stands, a 160,000 m3/ yr partition for deciduous leading stands , and a 23,000 m3/yr partition for Cw- leading within the ICH in the PG District Harvest Performance • Average annual billed harvest since 2002 has been ~9million cubic metres per year with the average over the past 5 years being ~ 10 million m3/yr. • Since 2010 there has been a significant shift from Prince George and Vanderhoof into southern Fort St. James. Timber Supply Review Program and Allowable Annual Cut • Examine relevant land use and forest management practices, public and First Nation’s input, and economic, environmental and social factors. • Provides the information needed to set the Allowable Annual Cut (AAC) for the next ten years. • Identify information to be improved for future timber supply reviews. Timber Supply Review Program and Allowable Annual Cut • AAC is the maximum volume of wood available for harvest from an area each year. • Pursuant to Section 8 of the Forest Act. determining AAC’s is the responsibility of the Chief Forester - Ministry of Forests, Lands and Natural Resource Operations Independent statutory decision maker Must not be fettered or allow themselves to be fettered Must not exceed the scope of authority provided in legislation (e.g. can determine an AAC but can not establish land use objectives). 6 • AAC determination is a professional judgement, not a calculation • AACs should reflect current practices and are not intended to drive management objectives • AACs are determined frequently to ensure they incorporate up to date information and knowledge 7 Information Collection & Data Package Public and Stakeholder Review 60 Day Reviews Discussion Paper (key analysis results) Public and Stakeholder Review AAC Determination and Rationale April 2014 April 2015 April 2016 Late Fall 2016 The Chief Forester must determine AACs for Timber Supply Areas (TSAs) and Tree Farm Licences (TFLs) every 10 years considering: The rate of timber production taking into account: Composition of the forest and the expected rate of growth Expected time to re-establish a forest after harvest Utilization and decay, waste and breakage Other IRM objectives The short and long term implications from alternative rates of harvest Abnormal insect infestations Social and economic objectives of the Crown Timber supply analysis uses a computer simulation model that projects the state of the forest into the future, given a set of assumptions about harvesting, forest management, and stand growth. 11 Forest Definition Slope & Elevation Distance Low volume stands and non-merchantable timber types Terrain Stability Areas reserved for the management of other resource values 6/3/2016 12 Process 13 • • • Intersect historic cutblock layer Analyze distribution of values Assign threshold and assess impact Pine Salvage Cutting permits Non salvage Cutting permits • • • • • • • • • Cultural heritage Community watersheds Range lands Old growth management Sensitive soils Riparian habitat Biodiversity Identified wildlife Ungulate winter range The original slide provided by the presenter contains a video, which is available for viewing by the City of Prince George Legislative Service Division (5th Floor, City Hall). The video will also be available for viewing during the live stream webcast of the Council meeting. Prince George TSA Crown Forest (Blue) and Timber Harvesting Land Base (green) Mountain Pine Beetle Attacked Pine Stands Timber Supply Model 21 Timber Supply Analysis 101 Harvest forecast 22 Timber Supply 101 – Uncertainty in Forecasting Prince George TSA Context - 2010 Base case composition (years 1 -20) 16,000,000 14,000,000 12,000,000 10,000,000 8,000,000 6,000,000 4,000,000 2,000,000 0 1 2 3 4 5 Green Volume 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Salvageable Volume Fibre bi-catch Alternative Harvest Flows 13,000,000 Comparison of current TSR base case with alternative harvest flows 12,000,000 11,000,000 10,000,000 9,000,000 8,000,000 7,000,000 6,000,000 5,000,000 4,000,000 3,000,000 2,000,000 1,000,000 0 2010 2020 2030 Salvage Focus 2040 2050 Balsam Partition 2060 2070 MNDY 2080 2090 Step down 2100 Base case 2110 2120 Thank you
© Copyright 2025 Paperzz