Rainer Kokemohr A locstandards of conductgful curriculum – some observations on its practical meaning In former times, children were seen as unfinished adults. Figure 1: A painting from 1555 – the children’s faces bear the traits of adult faces (Sofonisba Anguissola)1 About 500 years ago, in European painting children were painted small, but their faces painted adult. Accordingly, education was seen as a way to make finished adults out of unfinished children. For doing so, educators were asked to transfer knowledge and standards of social behavior onto the next generation. Even today, a curriculum in the conventional sense is still kind of a collection of knowledge and standards of behavior to be transferred onto the next generation in favor of a stable society. But children are not unfinished adults. Centuries later the idea of what children are has changed significantly. A painting from 1805 (by the romantic painter Otto Philip Runge) shows the difference. These kids look like we nowadays imagine children: Figure 2: A painting from 1805 shows children as children (Philip Otto Runge)2 The painting of the three children is an important step in developing the modern concept of childhood. You know the names of Jean-Jacques Rousseau, Friedrich Froebel, Maria Montessori or Jean Piaget from whom we learned that children are different. Children as we see them today go straight and open-minded into the world: Figure 3: The painting represents the idea of an open education In the painting there is no parent, no teacher. The children have left behind the house and the well-protected area of the garden. The picture represents the idea of an openminded development. 1/15 Children conquer the world with all their senses from the very beginning of their lives. They interact with the world and develop on their own account. Using ideas from Chinese culture, one could say that from the very beginning they are part of the eternal dynamic game of Yin and Yang. Educators can only help children on this path. Knowledge and standards of behavior are welcome, but they are no sufficient response to the children’s real needs. However, children cannot re-invent the world. They must learn, and adult people want them to take over the social stock of knowledge and of behavioral standards. Figure 4: The painting represents the idea of a closed education The Painting represents the idea of a closed education. It is a closed scene in that the persons are bound to each other. The girl in black attentively follows the mother. The mother, although looking out of the picture, is mastering the chess. The little girl looks at the older sister. The grandmother critically observes the overall scene. Through their looks, the three generations are arranged in a hierarchy. As chess symbolizes clear rules, the painting represents the idea of a closed education by focusing on a well-established world. Simplifying we get two opposite approaches. Figure 5 On the one hand, there is the instructional approach. It can be schematized in the following way. Figure 6: instructional approach The educator or teacher is asked to transfer knowledge and standards of conduct to the next generation. The basic idea is that children develop well if they are educated through rules and standards of conduct when entering the world. This idea presumes that the natural world itself is formed by rules and the social world by standards of conduct. Accordingly educators believe that children are well prepared for their life if they interpret the world in the light of the acquired rules and standards of conduct. 2/15 We can illustrate that idea. The instructional approach was developed at a time when people learned to love an orderly arranged nature. According to the instructional approach they introduce the children to rules and standards of conduct, and the children are requested to interpret the world through the application of these rules and standards to the world. Figure 7: Historical royal garden of Hannover, Germany This painting shows a historical royal garden surrounded by a wall. Inside, the nature is clearly structured. The raw nature is excluded. The garden expresses the desire of people to dominate the world by transforming nature into a well-ordered space. They want to pass on this settled world from generation to generation. Figure 8: structure of the instructional approach, simplified In this way children are expected to perceive the world as a system of rules and standards, what practically means a system of dos and don’ts. In this context, people tend to forget that the world such as presented through established rules or standards has been created by preceding generations. They tend to forget that the established world isn’t but a small part of the whole world with a lot of surprising phenomena worth to be discovered. Forgetting it they also forget that in this settled world there is no space for the children’s own experiences or discoveries beyond the boundaries of the already known world. On the other hand, there is what often is called the situational approach. More and more kindergartens follow this approach. They invite children to make interesting experiences with raw nature. Figure 9: situational approach: Open minded children experience the world. Here, stimulating situations such as a beach, climbing natural trees or an open fire are offered where children can develop their sense of balance and physical agility or explore interesting, strange and even dangerous phenomena of the world. 3/15 E.g. the scenes on the left side of the chart show children experiencing fire. The older boy on the upper picture is about 2½ years old, the younger one only 1 year old. Of course, adults take care that the children are protected from real danger. But the educators won’t exclude all risks. They trust in the children’s own attention growing with their own experiences. They believe that in this way children become more sensitive, more attentive and more creative in dealing with the phenomena of the world. The situational approach takes into account the fact that children are eager to directly experience the world with all their senses, to develop their skillfulness, their capacities of handling objects and animals, and to increase the prudence and courage of mastering dangerous activities. Thus the children learn how to do things or how to socially behave without explicitly knowing why. They get a lot of tacit knowledge including experienced rules and standards of conduct. So we get a first summary: The world to be known as a system of rules and standards The world to be experienced: rules and standards are generated through experience or connected with experience Figure 10: instructional approach <–/–> situational approach On the one hand, according to the instructional approach, children are equipped with a system of knowledge, of dos and of don’ts, and own experience is almost excluded. The standards and rules that preceding generations have developed are likely to be more important than the world itself. On the other hand, according to the situational approach, children are invited to experience real situations. They are asked to cope with challenges for being rewarded by a self-experienced development of skillful rules and intelligent standards of conduct. In short: The instructional approach is motivated by the desire of a stable world, whereas the situational approach is motivated by the desire of creating a better world. To cope with the relationship of closed and open education is the real challenge of education, and a modern curriculum must comply with it. Starting from this opposition we can turn to the following points: (1) A remark on the importance of the instructional approach (2) The situational approach - a close look at a case. (3) The importance of case studies (4) Primary experience. (5) Primary and secondary experience. (6) How to interpret the children’s unknown inner world? (7) Proposition of an open curriculum (8 A localized and meaningful curriculum 4/15 can invite educators to help children to enable the tight interplay of primary and secondary experience. 1. A remark on the importance of the instructional approach Within the instructional approach learning is a function of teaching. The educator or teacher is supposed to make the children learn. In this context knowledge is more or less taken as an object that simply can be transferred from generation to generation. Figure 11 : A caricature of school in former times: The world isn’t presented but in pictures and books (in the hand of the teacher). Still today, this approach rules the education in many societies from early childhood to high school. Figure 12 : a teacher-centered class The instructional approach is inherited from traditional societies. In traditional societies people believed that, for keeping the world stable, future generations must copy the life of previous generations. Consequently, a curriculum in its traditional sense is a closed collection of carefully chosen knowledge and carefully chosen standards of conduct to be transferred to the next generation in view of a human, harmonious and well-organized society. According to this approach, educational administrators often appreciate the curriculum as a tool for the production of good citizens.3 Figure 13: A closed curriculum: The Education Administration decides on the educational goals and the educators are expected to realize these goals. They are likely to believe that the application of a curriculum by transferring of “proper” knowledge and of “proper” standards of conduct will make the type of citizen they expect. 5/15 Although modern curricula are more complex the basic idea of instruction is still operational. The main difference is that the traditional goal of good conduct has been replaced by skills and competencies that match the economical requirements of worldwide competing societies. However, the idea of simply applying a curriculum by instruction fails. This idea fails because of two reasons. The first one: The instructional approach in its simple version is not aware of the fact that from the very beginning, education is an active interaction, and mutual understanding is indispensable. Parents know that it is nearly impossible not to respond to a crying baby. They strive to better understand their child. The more they interact with the baby the more it is a mutual education of the child and the parents as well. Parents learn what a child really is, and the hungry baby learns that help can be called. During the years, parents and teachers are challenged to understand the children, and children are challenged to understand the parents and teachers. A curriculum simply following the instructional approach fails in pedagogical interaction. The second reason: In modern societies, people are constantly being challenged by new situations and problems for which no answers in the traditional stock of knowledge and of standards of conduct can be found. Challenging issues are the climate change, the growing world population, international migration, economic competition or unequal distribution of wealth and their impact on daily life. They undermine the confidence in traditional ways of life. Therefore, educational goals are not to be set dogmatically. They must be open to dynamic interpretations by educators and children. The more the world is changing, the more creativity is asked and educational paradigms must turn from instruction to interaction. Fortunately, children are eager to increase their natural creativity. They are eager to learn because they perceive the situational suggestions and challenges of the world in which they are embedded with all their existence. Here, educators are to be cooperative partners of the children in positively responding to challenges. Since creativity cannot be taught by instruction, parents and educators only can offer situations inviting children to develop their natural curiosity and creativity. In early childhood the creative desire is particularly strong. Here, according to the situational approach the educational administration should offer open curricula. An open curriculum provides topics that can be interpreted in many ways. Figure 14: An open curriculum is pedagogically complex and more dynamic. Since it is open to different interpretations it stimulates creativity. 6/15 Different topics stimulate the joy of discovery and creativity of the children and of the educators as well. They increase their interpretation capacities and promote their interaction and understanding. Within an open curriculum experimental fields of intergenerational cooperation are offered and early childhood teachers can be cooperative partners of the children by sensitively observing, interpreting and positively supporting their activities. 2. The situational approach – a close look at a case Let us look at an example from early childhood. Since the parents can’t always be present, a baby may feel lost. The father may tell the baby that mom will come back soon. But the child at this age does not yet understand the meaning of ‘coming back soon’. It has not learned yet that a person can be present in one moment and absent in the next. However, it must cope with its anxiety by learning that the mother will come back. How can the baby learn what ‘coming back soon’ is? We cannot simply teach a baby what coming back is. ‘Coming back soon’ presumes a concept of presence and absence. The child can’t cope with its anxiety unless it creates a concept of presence and absence on its own. In other words: it must create a concept of space including the difference of here and there and a concept of time, including the difference of now and soon. Let me show you a video of our granddaughter at the age of 14 months: Figure 15: The 14-months-old girl Gesa “playing” with a stone (The photo replaces the video that will be shown in the lecture) The girl named Gesa buries a stone and digs it out again. At one moment the stone is under the shoe, at another moment it is upon the ground. Under the shoe it is invisible and upon the ground it is visible. She repeats this action during some minutes again and again. (Since the camera wasn’t at hand, I took my iPhone and caught only the very last moment.) What is the situation? The parents and we, the grandparents, are there. After finally digging the tiny stone out she presents it to her father and then to her grandma. Backed by the presence of adults she experiments with the stone and makes it present or absent. Using her hands, her feet, her eyes, her sense of touch, in short: her body she is creating a concept of presence and absence. By means of the stone and her bodily experience into she can create a symbolic concept of space and time. The concept of presence and absence, of space and time is not simply a mental construction. It is created in the interweaving interaction of physical actions, sensitive perception and mental formation. Making the physical experience into an abstract concept is the miraculous power of human intelligence. Similar to our granddaughter, in close observation of 7/15 each child we can learn what scientific research has discovered only after many troubles (cf. the cultural-historical school and the work of its protagonists Vigotsky, Leontiev and Luria and the supplementary research by Piaget). 3. The importance of case studies The situational approach asks us to perceive situations very carefully and sensitively. Case studies are a good way. Instead of following simple general statements about the child's development, we should observe individual cases repeatedly. What may happen when the child buries and digs out the stone? First, we do not know what really is going on in the child’s mind. However, remembering similar cases we notice that the child repeats the action again and again. And I can add that for several months Gesa invented a lot of similar games. There must be a strong interest. Regarding this interest we can share our observations with other parents or educators. Sometimes, scientific literature can also help. The case of our granddaughter reminded me a famous example presented by Sigmund Freud, the founder of psychoanalysis.4 One day, Freud observed his 1½ year-old grandson who was standing inside his bed, unable to leave it. He repeatedly threw away a wooden spool hanging on a thread: Figure 16: A boy throwing away a wooden spool (illustrating photomontage, R.K.) Then the child accompanied his actions with sounds meaning ‘gone’ and ‘there’. Freud interprets that the baby was marked by the mother’s threatening absence: Figure 17: the mother’s threatening absence Freud argues, that by throwing off the wooden spool and getting it back, the baby symbolically gains control of the mother’s absence and presence, her appearance and disappearance and overcomes his anxiety by symbolically mastering the gap between the mother’s presence and absence. Figure 18: The spool symbolizes the mother; she may be present or absent: The narrative construction of a mental order of disappearance and appearance supports the boy’s orientation in the world. 8/15 According to Freud the boy used the wooden spool for constructing a concept of absence and presence. This concept is linked to an object that the boy himself can manage. The spool helps him to symbolically rule the mother’s absence and presence. Often we forget how we organize presence and absence, time and space. However, symbolic representation is also our way as adults. 4. Primary experience Let us come back to our granddaughter. Her case is not as clear as that one of Freud’s grandson. Her stone was just a tiny stone she found by coincidence. Throwing away and retracting it by a thread was not possible. However, she explored the stone as a situational element. How that? A little stone can be used differently. It can form a row along with other stones. It can be thrown away. It can go unnoticed. The girl’s way was different. The days before, after a long winter period, she ‘helped’ her mother plucking weeds in the garden. There, she learned to manage the soil. Enabled by this experience she explores the stone as a situational element and lets the stone disappear and reappear. We saw how she was experimenting with the stone making it absent and present again. All her senses are involved in the creation of a concept of presence and absence. This is what can be called a primary experience. A primary experience cannot be taught. It cannot be taught by instruction. A primary experience can only be the result of the child’s own experience. As parents or educators we can only observe and try to support the child’s activity by sensitive interpretation. As soon as we have an idea about what the child is doing we are ready to follow him with respect. Possibly the girl playing with the tiny stone is inventing a game of disappearance and reappearance. It is just an interest, triggered by the situational context and profiting from a preceding experience. Through the invention of this game she makes a primary experience. It is new in that the stone in the soil symbolically allows her to detect a relation of disappearance and re-appearance. It is a primary experience in which the stone symbolically represents presence and absence of an object or a person in time and space. Henceforth, the result of this primary experience can be used for interpreting similar situations.5 5. Primary and secondary experience Primary experience is not yet worded experience. Besides primary experiences, there are secondary experiences. Secondary experiences originally were primary experiences that are translated into worded forms. As worded forms secondary experiences can be detached from the concrete original scene and the bodily experience. They can linguistically be communicated and offered to others. That is what preceding generations try to do when teaching the next generation. But we should never forget that a good understanding of secondary experience depends on the living basis of primary experience. A real understanding of secondary experience requires that its worded form is getting in mental touch with the imagination of its preceding primary experience. If primary experience is not activated, secondary experience remains dead knowledge. 9/15 The girl’s example can illustrate this transformation from primary to secondary experience: Her father often has to go to his office in Berlin, and he is absent for a couple of days. Some weeks after the video, the girl started using words. Since then she likes to point at the garden’s door uttering the words “Papa Berlin”. Pointing at the garden’s door and uttering the word “Berlin” symbolizes the father’s departure and her expectation of his return. So she masters her anxiety by using a word as a symbol of the father’s actual absence and his future presence. soon$(=$not$now$and$here) „Soon“$isn‘t$a$meaningful$word$unless$it$is$related$to$a$ mental$imagination$of$a$time$spatial$extension.$Since$ this$mental$imagination$can$not$simply$be$transferred$$ from$one$mind$to$another$the$girl$herself$must$create$ it.$Playing$with$the$tiny$stone$is$likely$to$be$one$of$her$ strategies$for$this$creation.$ Figure 19: The word “soon” can’t be understood unless a mental time spatial extension (represented by the brown arrow) is created. The child cannot understand words such as “now” or “soon” unless it has created in primary experience a concept of time and space, of presence and absence. We can generalize: Any instruction is a secondary experience transfer. It presupposes the creation of appropriate concepts by virtue of primary experience. Another example: If we tell a child “This is our family”, we use a word that in different cultures has different meanings. Secondary experience means objects that the members of a culture have agreed to interpret as units of consciousness. Normally we take topics of secondary experience as natural issues. But we have just forgotten that primary experience has become secondary experience by its symbolical wording. This also applies vice versa. We don’t really understand what a family is unless we go back to primary experience i.e. to the special feeling of being together that we have experienced in early childhood. Thus our feeling of being together is linked to the family that we are. Is it a small family of parents and one child or two children? Is it a large family including grandparents, aunts, uncles etc.? The relationship between primary and secondary experience is culturally shaped. This is true for all knowledge. Even scientific knowledge is culturally shaped. It is related to a more or less successful and finally worldwide dominating culture.6 The relationship of primary and secondary experience also applies to social standards of conduct. Let us return to the video. Figure 20: Gesa showing the stone to her father 10/15 The girl is acting with much energy. Obviously, a serious interest is working. We don’t know her concrete interest. We only can observe and guess. A moment later she proudly presents the tiny stone to her father and then to the grandma. Thus the adults seem to be somehow included in her game. Regarding this fact we may only assume that the girl’s game is a way to emotionally regulate her trouble with the father’s absence. But she is likely to give the emotional trouble a first communicative form and to ask for the others’ consent as if she wants to say: Look – you let me alone, but I can manage the trouble. 6. How to interpret the children’s unknown inner world? Education aims at the children’s inner processes, but how can we interact with a child unless we know his inner world? The more children of different cultures and languages come together in nurseries, kindergartens and schools, the more communication becomes difficult and educators are challenged. In a German project, parents, educators of some kindergartens, early childhood researchers and curriculum designers come together to cope with this challenge. They found two important conditions for the children’s good development. First, a long-term perspective on the children’s life is asked. The long-term orientation helps calming when dealing with ambiguities in child development. Secondly, the interaction between children and educators must be a real partnership respecting the needs of both sides. Regarding these two conditions educators, parents and curriculum responsible officers meet at regular workshops for studying together real cases. Since different minds perceive more than one, they can complement or correct each other. They also can easily refer to childhood development research. Thus they enhance their pedagogical understanding of situations. Educators who are alone with children bear the full responsibility. But within a team, they can share responsibility. They can more easily avoid direct instruction and support positive aspects simply by recognizing them in the children's own actions, and exclude negative aspects by disregarding them. 7. Proposition of an open curriculum A curriculum in the conventional sense of the term is a closed collection of well-defined secondary experiences. But how can a curriculum respond to the undeniable relation of primary and secondary experience? According to the situational approach the curriculum must be an open collection of issues that invite children and educators as well to possible interpretations. Educators should regard the curriculum topics as stimulating issues and encourage the children’s desire to discover the world. Doing so further education in workshops can help a lot. Let me refer to an interesting example of an open curriculum in which primary and secondary experience interact7: 11/15 Figure 21: open curriculum (inspired by G.E. Schäfer) Three elementary aspects are distinguished: A. Child potentials of self-formation (what can children do on their own?); B. Basic orientations of educators in view of the children’s self-formation (which ideas of child development do [or should] the educators have?; C. Areas and contents of (self-)formation (in between [A] and [B]: what fields and what contents are available?). What do we get here? This curriculum is not a simple collection prescribing knowledge to be acquired and standards of conduct to be adopted. However, the red, the green and the blue columns show that a huge stock of knowledge and of behavioral standards is included. But they are not to transfer as such. Situations are the starting point. (A) Child potentials of self-formation (what children can do on their own?) are stimulated in view of social relations, objects and meanings that situationally occur. (B) The educators’ basic orientations in view of the children’s self-formation play their role as elements of the children’s social environment. (C) Thus, the children’s potentials of self-formation and the educators’ basic orientations can meet and stimulate the children’s and the educators’ perceptions and internal processing in the areas of movement, playing, language and environment. Playing in early childhood is the natural way of learning. It is an important process of the children’s self-formation.8 Since regarding self-formation children need time for playing, the schedule of the day cannot be organized exactly by the minute and ruled by the educator. Children at this age learn the best when their play is inspired by a stimulating situation. Therefore, situations (outside and inside) should be set up so that children can use their body senses extensively. Materials usable in many ways should be available, e.g. small and large stones to build fancy houses or towers or light and heavy objects for spontaneous role-playing. In phases of playing different perceptual modes such as eyes, the sense of touch and molding, but also fantasy, linguistic and meaningful thinking are active. The educators should not insist on what they think to be the “correct” handling of the materials. Often, the material itself can help children to understand. Here, prefabricated materials committing children to certain usages are not suitable. Materials such as loam, sand and soil, small and large pieces of wood or industrially produced molding clay, plasticine or objects or non-specific Lego bricks provide better conditions for the exercise of body 12/15 senses and imagination. Let us have a look at situations with stimulating materials: Figure 22: Situations with stimulating materials There are a lot of inspiring objects. Children can easily move and develop their own ideas. The children's crafting is a way to develop the potentials of self-formation. The objects that they produce, as small as they may be, are steps on the path of their own lives. 8. A localized and meaningful curriculum can invite educators to help children to enable the tight interplay of primary and secondary experience. Finally, let us come back to the title of this conference: “Localized and Meaningful Curriculum”. It may be already clear what a meaningful curriculum is. But what is the meaning of a “localized” curriculum? Of course, the word “local” implies that the curriculum refers to experiences in the local environment. But there might be a secondary meaning in that a localized curriculum differs from a globalized curriculum. The content of a globalized curriculum should be the same for all people on this earth, and in view of knowledge and skills all people are considered equal in principle. In this sense, a global curriculum refers to a global identity. Accordingly, we can assume that a localized curriculum has a secondary meaning, namely the meaning of focusing on a local identity. In fact, the personal identity is a localized identity. It refers to primary experience. Only later a local identity can connect to a global identity, just as primary experience can connect to secondary experience. In other words: a global identity is founded in a local identity. For getting a concrete interpretation of this statement I would like to refer to another case. It is our friends’ son at the age of 4 years. His name is Alvar. Once when visiting the family, we brought as a gift a bin filled with small moldable chips. Made from corn the chips easily stick together if slightly wetted. Alvar’s first idea is to build a horse. But as soon as two chips stick together, he takes them as a hairdryer: Figure 23: The boy Alvar starts playing. (The photo replaces the video that will be shown in the lecture) Just like that it’s already a hairdryer, he utters. Taking the chips as a hairdryer is not what we at first glance think them to be. The boy adds a surprising idea to what he is producing. 13/15 It's not just a coincidence that the idea of a hairdryer comes into his mind. It is likely to refer to a preceding situation where the hairdryer may have played an important role. Hair washing was always a real drama for Alvar. Even when he was a baby he strongly refused to get water on his head, and the parents had to invent a lot of strategies to make him submit hair washing. The frightening feeling of water is likely to make him wonder what might happen on the head. It is a primary experience of a process that overcomes him without control. In this context, Alvar’s actual play is likely to remind him the primary experience of anxiety. But the chips stuck together to a hairdryer allow the boy to symbolically control his anxiety. Like that the uncontrollable primary experience of the terrifying water is becoming a secondary experience. The secondary experience is a worded experience. The utterance “just like that it’s already a hair drier” refers to the anxiety as already defeated, as just like that mastered. The worded experience enables the boy to share with others.9 Figure 24: “just like that it’s already a hairdryer” Living between anxiety and safety dominates us a lifetime. We can interpret the boy’s hairdryer construction as an imagination of his feelings between anxiety and safety. Successfully coping with these feelings will be a momentum of his personal, very local identity. But since his local anxiety is symbolically banned by the hairdryer, he can express his fear. Of course, at this stage, it is still an indirect expression. But he is already on the way to communicate with others. If he goes ahead, he will be able to connect his personal-local identity to a communicable, namely global identity. Is this interpretation too sophisticated? A child is not yet a rational being able to be aware of this process. Of course, for him, it just happens. But a detail may justify the interpretation. The parents told me, that Alvar likes very much to use the hairdryer for drying his little sister’s hair. Doing so he is repeating the struggle against his own anxiety by projecting it onto the sister’s hair wash. This is the idea that I wanted to develop: A localized and meaningful curriculum is a good help for educators if it opens a broad field of interpretation to concretely activate the tight interweaving between the children’s primary and secondary experience. The more educators improve their ability of interpreting that interweaving, the better teachers they are. The Spanish painter Sofonisba Anguissola was known in her time primarily as a portrait painter and as a painter of everyday and group scenes. The most famous image is Three Sisters playing chess, pain ted around 1555. It is considered as the first representation of an everyday scene in Italian painting. 1 14/15 Philipp Otto Runge was a major painter of the early Romantic period. The early Romantic period is the period in which people learned to see the child as a child. This view had been prepared by Jean Jacques Rousseau's famous educational novel "Emile". 3 This is what actually is happening in Taiwan where the education minister of the ruling party KMT insists on a history curriculum that is to make the students China-friendly. 4 Cf. Sigmund Freud, Beyond The Pleasure Principle, Volume 18, Standard Edition, pp. 14-17, quotation here: http://personal.bgsu.edu/~dcallen/Fort-Da.html 5 Cf. Edmund Husserl, Erfahrung und Urteil, Hamburg (Claassen), 1964. Jean-Luc Marion, Die Banalität der Sättigung. In: H.-D. Gondek, T.N. Klass, L. Tengelyi (eds.), Phänomenologie der Sinnereignisse. München (Fink), 2011, 78 – 98. 6 The worldwide domination of ‚scientific knowledge’ as secondary experience includes different types of secondary experience that can be found. Indeed, different cultures as well as children develop different types of secondary experience. This fact gets evident if we analyze concepts such as ‚power’, ‚life’, ‚death’ and many others in different cultures. 7 Cf. Gerd E. Schäfer, Bildung beginnt mit der Geburt. Berlin, Düsseldorf, Mannheim 2007, 217. 8 Cf. Schäfer, loc. cit., 233 – 267. 9 At this point, we could learn more from developmental psychology and enlarge the developmental context of Alvar’s play if we had a little more time: Probably the hair dryer refers to the boy’s fear of hair washing as a threatening experience in his early life. – During the first months of life a baby is unable to coordinate the movements of the body. In case there is no help the child feels lost.9 Yet at normal care he learns to remember his mother’s face and voice, to get a feeling of his hands, to recognize some objects, to interact with other people etc. It is a way from the child’s being lost to increasing control. On this way, the so-called mirror stage is an important momentum (cf. Lacan,…, Youtube …). The French psychoanalyst Jacques Lacan was the first to analyze it. The mirror stage normally occurs between 6 and 18 months of age. Probably you know situations like this one: 2 A child detecting somebody in the mirror A child is facing the image in the mirror. What does happen at this moment? The child gets aware that there is a person. He may try to touch the person. Chimpanzees or cats show a similar reaction to the mirror’s image. But as soon as they learn that there is no real animal, chimpanzees or cats lose interest. Human children react differently. They more or less insist on grasping of what is going on. Children in front of a mirror, turning to an adult person Unable to get an idea the child can look with a questioning face at the mother or another adult person. In this situation, adults typically answer that’s you! And sometimes you can experience how the mind of the child makes click, the child may cheer and show his happiness. What has happened? We may think that the child got aware of himself. But for the child, there isn’t yet any “self”. He has not yet learned the meaning of the mother’s saying “that is you!” So, what is going on in the child’s mind? The picture in the mirror shows a whole person with a coordinated body. And there is the saying “that is you!” If the moment is favorable, the utterance stimulates the child to take the image as an expression of his self. It is a miracle of the human mind. In psychology it is called the creation of a “Gestalt”, i.e. the creation of a shape forming a coordinated whole. The child creates his self and henceforth, he differently refers to others. The mirror stage is the momentum between anxiety and safety. It is a momentum between a closed and an open world. It is important because the desire of creativity emerges. In favor of creativity, the mirror stage process can and should be revived lifetime. Children tend to revive this process, when playing. 15/15
© Copyright 2024 Paperzz