Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act
{MGNREGA}
1. Planning – Review of IPPE and the follow up trainings
2. Works
a. Linkage with agriculture – status of each State – (16) States below the
prescribed 60% limit – discussion on steps taken by each of these States – way
forward.
b. Rural Sanitation – “one lakh Model villages” – for discussion and adoption of
plan of action
c. Convergence– SCP – implementation
d. Implementation of the IWMP convergence guidelines – number of IWMP
blocks, types of works reserved for MGNREGS execution
e. Convergence with NRLM groups – way forward
f. Road-side plantation– progress in 2014-15 and Plan for 2015-16
g. Outcome orientation – number of works for which outcomes have been
entered – steps for universalisation
h. State quality monitors – Status of filling up positions – feedback and follow
action.
i. Higher material works – identification of works and plan of action.
3. Financial:
a. Conversion of accounts to PMJDY
b. Avoiding delays in payment – steps taken – Delay compensation system
c. Unemployment allowance
d. eFMS – progress of expansion plan – VSATs – convergence with CSC-SPV.
e. Conversion to Aadhaar based payment system – seeding of Aadhaar numbers
4. Administration:
a. Order regulating Admin expenditure at various levels – implementation – steps
taken by States.
b. Booking Technical Assistant cost in estimate – implementation – barefoot
engineers – steps taken for filling up all vacancies
c. Line Dept. officers as POs (draft for discussion)
d. Training of the technical staff – progress
e. Review of the CFT project – issues in implementation
f. Organisation of labour groups – progress and strategy
5. Social Audit – Scheme for strengthening Social Audit – implementation:
a. Filling up vacancies
b. Training of the staff already recruited
c. Orders on provision of records
d. System for taking follow-up action
6. Implementation of IEC plan – including
a. Rozgar Divas
b. Successful stories for the newsletter
c. Uploading photographs of assets created
7. Pending Parliamentary assurances under Rule 377 and PMO references
8. Implementation of Geographic Information System (GIS) mapping space technology
9. Simplification of Processes and Forms
PRC AGENDA
Page 1
National Rural Livelihoods Mission
(NRLM - Aajeevika)
I.
Status of Transition of States to N.R.L.M and sanction of Annual Action Plans (AAP) for FY
2014-15 of Mission States
1.1 28 States have transited to NRLM and their Annual Action Plans for FY 2014-15 have been
approved by the Ministry. The State of Goa has not yet transitioned to N.R.L.M. The
Government of Goa has appointed a CEO and a core team, but it needs to set up an
autonomous Society and submit the Annual Action Plan for 2014-15. Goa is expected to
transit during third quarter of FY 2014-15.
1.2 Two important features of the Action plan for the current financial year are a phasing plan and
a result framework for the next 4-5 years. The State Missions have to develop 3-5 year plans
towards the same. Further, the State Missions have been advised to formulate detailed action
plans for each resource, intensive and partnership block. In case this requires changes in the
approved AAP, a supplementary plan can be submitted in the third quarter of FY 2014-15.
Action Points:

During the current financial year, the State of Goa is expected to transit to NRLM. The
State Government should complete the remaining steps. N.M.M.U. will provide all
necessary support for the transition process.
 The State Missions have to formulate a detailed 3-5 year plan for the state in general
and for their current resource, intensive and partnership blocks in particular. The State
Missions may, wherever necessary, revise their AAPs for FY 2014-15 and submit to
MoRD for the consideration of Executive Committee (EC) by December 2014.
II. Mission Structure - Status of staffing and induction of staff at S.M.M.U., D.M.M.U. and
B.M.M.U.
2.1 States, particularly those supported under NRLP, have made significant progress in terms of
setting up implementation architecture. Most of the States have completed recruitments at
various levels. The status of recruitment and positioning of staff at State/District/Blocks level
in the States is indicated at Annexure -I.
2.2 All the states have been advised to have a Chief Operating Officer, recruited from the market,
with experience in development sector, to lead the program functions.
2.3 The states have also been advised to communitize the Mission as far as possible by selecting
the staff up to the block level from the community, through the community and in the
community institutions. To that extent, the HR of the Mission in the field, block, district and
state levels need to be rationalized.
PRC AGENDA
Page 2
2.4 Further, the states are advised to ensure that staff at block, district and state level function as
generic team members, by collapsing specialization as far as possible, for the coming 2-3
years.
2.5 The states have been advised to customize, adopt and implement the model HR Manual that
includes a broad perspective of HR requirement and management in NRLM, HR processes, HR
hygiene factors and Performance Management.
Action Points:


The Missions shall recruit Chief Operating Officer (Programme) by end October 2014.
The Missions shall rationalize the HR requirement in view of the communitization and
collapsing of specialization of staff, by December 2014.
 The Missions shall customize and adopt HR manual with due approvals by October
2014 and implement the same.
2.4 Induction and Capacity Building of Mission Staff
Detailed 3-4 month induction modules including classroom training, village night stays,
immersion and exposure visits, accompanying with Community Resource Persons, attachment
with grassroots workers/professionals, skill training, etc., have been shared with States for
staff at various levels. The states are advised to ensure that all the staff at various levels go
through these induction modules diligently. These elements and other capacity building
modules including thematic trainings, refresher trainings and events need to be captured in
the MIS. States are further advised to post all the staff in the field for 6-12 months before they
come to district/state level.
All the staff need to get training on Visioning and Strategic Planning, Participation Processes,
Participatory Training Methods, Leadership and Management Skills, Results Planning and
Monitoring, etc. Each one needs to appreciate the 10-years perspective with a household,
SHG, SHG Federations, Village and Block.
Action Point:
 All States should complete the induction of all the staff on board in the Missions, by
December 2014. The induction and immersion of all new staff at S.M.M.U., D.M.M.U.
and B.M.M.U. shall be completed within first 3-4 months of their joining the Mission.
 All states should offer complete visioning and strategic planning workshops at district
and state levels by February 2015.
III. Support to State Missions
3.1
State Anchoring by N.M.M.U.
State Anchoring is a critical role to provide technical assistance to States. As of now,
Professionals from National Mission Management Unit (N.M.M.U.) support each State. The
process of creating the State Anchor Team instead of individuals has been initiated. NMMU is
PRC AGENDA
Page 3
undertaking regular field visits to the Mission States. Monthly/bi-monthly thematic
conferences through video conferencing and bi-monthly thematic review meetings with State
Missions have been initiated, which are facilitating technical support to States.
States had sought N.M.M.U.’s support to conduct visioning exercise in their respective States.
5 States - Jharkhand, Madhya Pradesh, Chhattisgarh, Karnataka and Rajasthan have
successfully completed the visioning workshops. These need to be followed up with strategic
planning workshops.
The resource persons at state level in Jharkhand and MP have undergone training on
Participatory Processes and Participatory Identification of Poor. Jharkhand is expected to be a
resource state on this.
NMMU has just taken up working with States through 4-5 member monthly/bi-monthly team
visits to build them into self-reliant CB states, starting with Chattisgarh, Jharkhand, Odisha,
and Bihar, over 7-8 months till March 2015. This will be gradually taken up in more states with
appropriate customization.
NMMU will also work with select states in developing 3-5 year perspective plans with all
states and these can be included as part of AAP 2015-16.
Action Points:
 State anchoring teams are expected to be operational by December’14 for select
states.
 Four states would be worked on intensively for making them self-reliant in Capacity
Building by March, 2015.
 Select states would develop and include 3-5 years perspective plans as part of their
AAPs 2015-16.
 Capacity Building workshop with all states is scheduled towards the end of September,
2014.
 All states should undertake writeshops at the state level in October 2014 and
participate in the National Annual Writeshop(s) in November 2014 at Hyderabad. For
NE and NW states separate writeshops are also planned in December 2014.
3.2 Project Implementation Manuals:
States have been provided with Model Human Resource Manual, Model Community
Operational Manual (COM), Model Finance Management Manual, and Final Draft Project
Implementation Plan and these Manuals and plans need to be customized and adopted with
the approval of their SRLM E.C./G.B. The COM in local language should be provided to the
communities and the field staff to facilitate implementation of NRLM in Blocks.
The State Missions should work further on, customize, translate and use the Community
Capacity Building modules in Resource Blocks and/or the outlines of the modules circulated by
NMMU/NIRD customized, translated and used.
PRC AGENDA
Page 4
Action Point:

3.3
All the states should customize, adopt and roll-out COM with the approval of their
SRLM EC by December 2014.
Pools of Resource Persons and Capacity Building Resource Agencies
A pool of about resource persons at the national level has been prepared by NIRD/NMMU,
based on mutual exploration and assessment of their thematic interest and usefulness, and
they have been oriented to NRLM. The resource persons have been graded for paying
resource fee based on the grade. The resource person list based on the geographic and
thematic interests of the resource persons is dynamic and would be updated regularly.
SRLMs/SIRDs have been asked to develop their own State Resource Pools (SRP) to meet the
capacity building needs. These State pools would be inducted by SRLMs with support from the
national resource pool.
Also, a framework for taking the services of Capacity Building Resource Agencies has been
approved and the services of enlisted/empanelled CB Agencies could be taken up by SRLMs
on partnership basis as per the framework.
Action Points:



3.4
The States may plan and utilize the services of the National Resource Pool.
The states should develop State Resource Pool, induct them and take their services.
As part of the CB Action Plan of the states, the states may partner with CB Agencies.
Participatory Identification of Poor (PIP)
The States have been asked to strengthen the Village Organisations in the Resource Blocks
and Intensive Blocks during the current FY 2014-15, wherein identification of the poor
women/households can be done by the Village Organisations using PIP methodology. In
accordance to the follow-up of the national workshop held on the Participatory Identification
of the Poor (October 2013), the States have been asked to conduct workshops/training on
Participatory Identification of the Poor, accordingly. In MP and Jharkhand, the professional
and community resource persons have been trained at the state level and an indicative PIP
protocol has been developed.
Action Point:

The states have to develop state level professional and community resource persons
on PIP and initiate the identification of the poor where Village Organizations have
come into being at the earliest.
PRC AGENDA
Page 5
IV.
Social mobilization and institution building in Resource and Intensive blocks
4.1
Resource blocks
Teams of Community Resource Persons (CRPs) and Professional Resource Persons (PRPs) from
National Resource Organisations (NRO) [Society for Elimination of Rural Poverty (SERP)
Andhra Pradesh, Society for Elimination of Rural Poverty (SERP) Telangana and Bihar Rural
Livelihoods Promotion Society (BRLPS)] are facilitating implementation, building community
institutions and nurturing community cadre to support the community institutions in resource
blocks/clusters. NROs are also providing Human Resource and Capacity Building support to
SRLMs. CRP Teams and PRPs are supported by the SRLM staff.
Resource blocks generate enough social capital for scaling up of the project activities in other
blocks. It is envisaged that each resource block would support scaling up of social mobilization
work in 20 or more new blocks in a phased manner.
So far, 16 States have begun to implementing Resource Block Strategy. 6 States would be
taking up the same in 2015-16. The progress made under resource blocks is at Annexure-II.
Action Points:



4.2
SRLMs have to ensure adoption of resource blocks by SPMs and clusters by DPMs to
devote 10-15 days in every month and steer the entire implementation process
therein, including identifying women activists and nurturing them into internal CRPs.
A 5 year vision for each resource block has to be developed where in every resource
block is emerging as implementation partner to SRLM to handle the IB & CB in
intensive blocks.
Bi-monthly experience sharing amongst SRLMs shall also be facilitated.
Intensive blocks
After six months of their induction and experience of working in the resource blocks, the staff
in the intensive blocks shall start working in 4-5 villages of their clusters by engaging the
available social capital/community cadres till that block is supported by internal CRPs and
PRPs from resource blocks. The resource blocks would be used as local immersion sites. Once
the internal CRP teams are available to the intensive blocks, all the resource block protocols
would be applicable to the intensive blocks also.
The SRLMs are advised to align their expansion/phasing of blocks in accordance with the
availability of internal social capital from the resource blocks.
Currently, about 400 blocks (apart from Resource Blocks) fall under this category.
PRC AGENDA
Page 6
Action Points:




SRLMs have to ensure 6-month induction (apprentice) to the staff of intensive blocks
in resource blocks.
SRLMs have to develop 3-5 year phasing plan for initiating intensive blocks.
SRLMs have to rationalize and reduce staff in intensive blocks.
N.M.M.U. State anchors shall also actively handhold intensive block rollout by getting
support from resource blocks.
4.3 Partnership Blocks
The states are advised to take up partnership with NGOs and CBOs that have done significant
substantial mobilization (around 20-30%) on a ‘no-cost’ basis or ‘cost’ basis. NGOs would be
provided support only for capacity building and management costs, if required. The funds to
the community would flow directly to the SHGs and their federations from the SRLM.
Based on the Partnership framework, Jharkhand has entered into a partnership agreement
with PRADAN for implementation of NRLM in 14 blocks. Partnership MOU has also been
signed by Maharashtra Mission with the IFAD-funded MAVIM project.
Action Point:

4.4
States may enter into similar partnerships in the case of Odisha, Uttar Pradesh,
Karnataka, Gujarat etc.
Non-Intensive blocks
The scope and nature of support available to Non-intensive blocks is limited to strengthening
existing SHGs and facilitating them to access financial assistance from banks. The SRLMs have
put in place one or two project staff to take up social mobilization and institution building.
There will be no formation of new village level S.H.G federations in the non-intensive areas.
The SRLMs are advised to view the work in non-intensive blocks as preparation for intensive
blocks in future. SLRM may adopt 1-3 blocks in a district (5-10 villages each) and demonstrate
qualitative capacity building activities and financial inclusion. When the non-intensive block
transits to intensive block strategy, it is expected that these villages would serve as resource
areas for other villages in the block.
V.
Financial Inclusion and Building Access to Finance
Disbursement of interest subvention received fillip during the review period. Interest subvention
scheme was streamlined to facilitate disbursement. Further, efforts were made to build the
capacities of SRLMs to augment the pace of SHG bank linkage. The progress made in these areas is
briefly summarized below:
PRC AGENDA
Page 7
5.1 Roll out of the Interest Subvention Scheme
Progress in respect of category I districts:
1. the scheme is being implemented through Canara Bank for Public Sector Banks
and NABARD for RRBs;
2. a web-portal for submission of claims by banks has been created and hoisted;
3. 24 Public Sector Banks and 34 RRBs have lodged claims for interest subvention
through Canara Bank and NABARD;
4. several rounds of meetings and video-conferences with banks were held to
guide the banks in operationalizing the scheme;
5. two consultations were held with IBA sub-committee to facilitate
operationalization of the scheme; and
6. the MoRD has disbursed interest subvention claims for 8.08 lakh SHGs involving
an amount of Rs. 343 Cr. (State wise status of disbursement is placed at
Annexure – III)
Progress in respect of category II
1. Society for Elimination of Rural Poverty, (SERP) A.P is providing technical
support to SRLMs for operationalization of the scheme in the Category II
Districts, i.e. other than 150 Districts;
2. A dedicated web portal has been hosted;
3. Data accessed directly from bank CBS servers are being uploaded on the portal.
State Missions are able to access reports on computation of interest subvention
from the portal and release interest subvention amount directly to SHG
accounts;
4. Six State Missions have accessed the reports and transferred interest
subvention amounts to eligible SHGs directly. (State wise status of
disbursement is placed at Annexure – III)
5. As of August 2014, 6.94 lakh SHGs were provided an interest subvention of Rs
183.23 Cr.
Action Points:
All SRLMs:
1. to ensure submission of claims by RRBs pertaining to Category-I districts;
2. to ensure data sharing by RRBs with National Resource Organization;
3. to access reports on Interest Subvention and release interest subvention
amount to eligible SHGs;
4. to working with banks to ensure proper coding of SHGs, so that the benefit
reaches to all eligible women SHGs;
5. to monitor the performance of the SHGs to ensure prompt repayment, such
that women SHGs in Category I districts get the additional benefits of 3%
PRC AGENDA
Page 8
interest subvention and in Category-II districts, become eligible for benefit
under interest subvention; and
6. to spread awareness about the Interest subvention Scheme.
5.2
Progress of SHG- Bank linkage
During FY 2013-14, 12.7 lakh SHGs were credit linked to the tune of Rs 21875.1 Cr1. (statewise Credit Target Achievement during 2013-14 is placed at Annexure-IV).
To facilitate monitoring of credit linkage of SHGs, a web-based bank linkage portal has been
developed which access data directly from bank CBS platforms. Up to Aug 2014, 25 Public
sector Banks and 17 RRBs have transferred data to the portal. Up to 31st March 2014, 8.99
lakh SHGs were sanctioned fresh loans to the tune of Rs 17387.47 Cr
For FY 2014-15, a credit target of Rs 28817 Cr has been fixed. The targets have been
communicated to all states. (State wise credit targets are placed at Annexure-V). All states
have been required to get their targets approved by SLBCs.
Several activities were taken up to promote SHG bank linkage. In May 2014, a National
Workshop on SHG-Bank Linkage was held in Srinagar with the participation of all major banks
and SRLMs. The workshop finalized protocols for capitalization of SHGs, block level linkage
plan and monitoring mechanism. On this occasion a Handbook on SHG-Bank Linkage was
released. The Handbook details process and steps to be adopted for promoting and
monitoring SHG bank linkage.
Action Points
All SRLMs are required to make the following arrangements for ensuring adequate flow
of bank credit to eligible SHGs.
1. Linkage Targets: workout district wise, block wise, bank wise and bank branch wise
linkage target in consultation with SLBC, NABARD & Controlling offices of different banks
and communicate the same to all concerned;
2. Workshops: Organize State & District level workshop involving bankers, SRLM staff and
other stakeholders to appraise them of the targets and evolve district specific strategies
for achieving the same;
3. MOU: Sign MoU with leading banks operating in each state for promoting SHG Bank
linkage;
4. Dedicated Personnel: position dedicated personnel at SMMU and district levels for
promoting SHG Bank linkage;
5. Immersion & Training: facilitate conduct of immersion and training for all Bank Branch
Managers in intensive blocks at the best practice sites within or outside the state. Also
conduct immersion and training for all SRLM staff on SHG Bank linkage;
1
As per provisional data received from NABARD
PRC AGENDA
Page 9
6. Inventory: prepare an inventory of all eligible SHGs for linkage;
7. SLBC Sub committees: regularize conduct of SLBC sub-committee meeting preferably on
a monthly or bimonthly basis;
8. DRLC Sub Committees: regularize conduct of DRLC Sub-committee meeting & BLBC
meetings in the intensive districts and blocks;
9. Disbursal of interest subvention: facilitate interest subvention amount to eligible SHGs in
Category –II districts;
10. Review: undertake monthly review of the progress against targets, NPA among SHG
loans, disbursal of interest subvention – district, block, bank and branch wise and place
reports on the NRLM portal.
VI. Rural Self Employment Training Institutes (RSETIs)
6.1 Issues related to RSETI
Background






As on date 577 RUDSETIs/ RSETIs are functional across the country sponsored by all the
Nationalised Banks in their respective lead Districts.
Total candidates trained – over 14 lakh during the period 1982 to 2014 with a settlement
rate of 51%
Variety of training programmes to suit the local needs
Skill coupled with EDP inputs
Run by an experienced banker with emphasis on settlement with Credit linkage
Practical orientation, rigorous training and extended hours of learning
6.2 Issues for discussion:
Action point by State
(i) Allotment and handing over possession of land for construction of RSETIs. List of
completed projects is placed in Annexure - VI. It may be noted that as against 577
RSETIs currently functioning, construction of only 55 buildings have been completed.
(ii) LAC meetings shall be convened regularly once in a quarter
(iii) BLBC / DLRC/ BCC and LAC to review the performance of RSETI with special reference
to credit linkage of RSETI trained candidates and to ensure good settlement rate
(iv) Ensuring seamless reimbursement of Training cost to banks
Action point by Banks
(i)
Director/Faculty/Office staff to move out for organising Awareness programmes
for personal follow up of trained candidates
and
(ii)
Financial sanctions for entire year shall be made available by the Banks based on the
Annual Action Plan prepared by the RSETI and approved by LAC.
(iii)
Special care and attention shall be given to compilation and updating of MIS
PRC AGENDA
Page 10
(iv) Best Practices of RUDSETIs to be meticulously followed by all RSETIs
(v) Banks to ensure availability of adequate training equipment at all training programmes
at all RSETIs
6.3 Grading of RSETIs
In order to encourage a spirit of excellence amongst the RSETIs, an initiative was taken in the
year 2012 to grade the RSETIs on transparent parameters.
A statement giving
statewise/bankwise grading status of RSETIs 2012 and 2013 is in Annexure VII& VIII.
For the year 2014, grading parameters have been suitably modified to emphasize more on
post training activities such as settlement of candidates and bank linkage. Currently the
grading for 2014 is underway and is expected to be completed by 30.9.2014.
VII. Livelihoods Promotions:Mahila Kisan Sashaktikaran Pariyojana (MKSP):
7.1
Activities undertaken & Progress
 Since inception of MKSP, 65 projects in 14 States have been sanctioned with a total project
outlay of Rs 796.77 Crore covering more than 28.2 lakhs Mahila Kisans (at the end of Q1 FY
2014-15).
 41% of the total Mahila Kisans covered belong to SC/ST categories (ST- 13%, SC- 28%).
 Andhra Pradesh and Kerala projects being implemented by respective State Rural
Livelihoods Missions are covering all the districts and blocks of the States. In rest of the 12
States, where MKSP is being implemented, the coverage is in 178 blocks of 95 districts.
 MKSP is now focusing on identifying the strategies being implemented by different PIAs for
the Poorest of the Poor (POP) farmers through promotion of Community Managed
Sustainable Agriculture (CMSA) practices by adopting non pesticide management of
agriculture. Identification of the suitable agro ecological models for the poorest of poor
households across the different states, was the major exercise undertaken during the MKSP
review for Q1 (FY 2014-15) The different strategies were evaluated on the basis of welldefined criteria for suitability for further scaling up. The identified models are expected to
be replicated in other intensive blocks of the State by the respective State Missions.
 Besides, a major drive has been taken up by NRLM to replicate one of the very successful
CMSA models for the Poorest of the Poor (POP) farmers developed and scaled up by SERP
across Andhra Pradesh. This is a Community Resource Person (CRP) led model which strives
to create a large pool of CRPs, who drive the scaling up process. Deployment of large
number of Community Professionals for promotion of sustainable agro-ecological practices
will be a key strategy for NRLM in primary sector livelihoods interventions across the
country. This strategy will be specifically adopted to reach out to the bottom 20% of the
poor women farmers.
PRC AGENDA
Page 11



State Missions of Rajasthan, Madhya Pradesh, Jharkhand, Chhattisgarh and Jammu Kashmir
signed an MOU with SERP for rolling out of the Poorest of Poor strategy in the resource
blocks of their state. In the first round 2 districts, 2 blocks, 20 villages were covered in each
of the states.2
NRLM livestock strategy would primarily focus on building a community owned and
community managed extension architecture that can effectively make the last mile delivery
of animal care services highly cost effective and sustainable. NRLM will invest in the training
and capacity building of the PashuSakhi in a continuous manner who will form the backbone
of last mile service.
A MKSP like program is planned to be launched for the rural artisans - In this regard, a two
day consultation workshop was organized in New Delhi on 2 nd -3rd September 2014 with the
different organizations having wide experience in this sector, to finalize the strategies and
NRLM guidelines to reach out to 5.0 lakh rural artisan households.
Action Points:
 All the States now would come through Annual Action Plan (AAP) route for MKSP projects
from 2014 (AAP to be focused on replicating the successful models of agro ecological
farming practices like Non Pesticide Management).
 A three day workshop/write-shop was organized at Chennai, with the different
NGOs to develop suitable proposals to be taken up under AAP of TNSRLM.
 NSO-PRADAN and N.M.M.U. team has started compilation and documentation of the
existing best practices in the different States.
 Some of the best practices identified by NSO in West Bengal, Kerala and
Jharkhand was presented during the quarterly review meeting, where the
participants discussed the scalability of different models in different areas.
 An MoU has been signed with Digital GREEN as National Support Organisation for
Innovative Information and Communication Technology application for livelihoods
 A large number of audio visual training materials on agro ecological farming
practices developed by community members across the country with the
support from Digital Green will extremely useful for community led strategy for
capacity building. This training strategy has already been successfully
implemented in AP and Bihar.
 Digital GREEN is supporting in the structuring of data collection, collation and
reporting mechanisms for the MKSP PIAs. In this connection it has already
engaged with MSSRF-Maharashtra, IDF-Karnataka, Green Foundation-Karnataka
(MKSP PIAs) for production of videos for the different practices promoted by
them.
2
In case of Jharkhand, under PoP strategy, 2 districts, 2 blocks and 15 villages were covered in the first round of CRP
drive.
PRC AGENDA
Page 12
 In this regard, a workshop has been planned for two days at Ranchi in the first
week of June 2014, which will be attended by State mission representatives and
PIAs from Jharkhand, Odisha and Assam.
 A documentary film on Mahila Kisan Shashaktikaran Pariyojana is currently under
production, with the support of UNDP. This film is capturing the key learnings of MKSP
in various States.
 Printed communication materials like brochure, foldable material and a compilation of
stories of “ best practicing community heroes” is currently under development, with
the support of UNDP. These are expected to present the work done under MKSP for the
larger audience.
 Process of hiring of an MIS agency is currently underway with the support of UNDP to
develop a comprehensive MIS for Livelihoods, which will be later integrated with eNRLMs.
 The hiring is expected to be completed by the end of September 2014.
 Sustainable Livelihoods and Adaptation to Climate Change (SLACC) project is due to be
launched with the support from Global Environment Fund (GEF). Ground work for the
same has been completed.
 A third party evaluation of all MKSP proposals is planned. For this, procurement of a
suitable agency will be done before end of the FY 2014-15.
7.2
Issues with implementation of MKSP
 Absence of dedicated staff for monitoring MKSP activities in the States which affects the
proper implementation of project
 Poor due diligence carried out by SRLMs on the MKSP projects received Absence of desk appraisal/field appraisal reports on the received projects by the
States, forwarded to N.M.M.U.-SRLM Tamil Nadu, SRLM Jharkhand, SRLM MP etc.
 Poor quality of MKSP projects received by N.M.M.U.- Projects do not adhere to the
submission templates, budget templates etc.-SRLM-TN, SRLM-MP




Holding/Delay of transfer of central share to the PIA by the SRLM. eg. SRLM West Bengal,
SRLM Assam etc.
Absence of bi-monthly review of PIA by the State mission
Mandatory documents like Inception report, DPR, Baseline report and quarterly reports
have not been submitted by SRLM-Bihar, in spite of several reminders during many previous
quarterly review meetings.
Poor attendance of the SRLM teams to the quarterly review of PIAs. In the previous MKSP
quarterly review, SPMs from Odisha, Jharkhand, Gujarat, Chhattisgarh, MP and AP only
attended the review. SRLM Bihar has not participated in the last quarterly review meeting in
July 2014.
PRC AGENDA
Page 13
Action Points (for SRLMs):
 The States need to put in place district and Block level teams for livelihoods verticals
 Undertake bi monthly review meeting and field visits with the MKSP partners
implementing projects in the respective States It is expected that States like- Jharkhand, Madhya Pradesh, Karnataka and
Gujarat initiate the process at the earliest.
 To include MKSP areas under intensive strategy and initiate social mobilization process in
an intensive manner.
 Except AP, Bihar and Kerala, all other States (11 States) covered under MKSP
may consider the MKSP areas under intensive blocks
 Explore possibilities to take services from NSO-PRADAN for capacity building of livelihood
team and also identify best practices in agro ecological farming specially the central
Indian States like MP, Jharkhand, Odisha and Chhattisgarh
 Collaborate with NSO-digital GREEN to develop audio-visual training and capacity building
products in the Livelihoods domain, which will make the process more efficient on
account of reduced communication loss. The priority States envisaged for this
collaboration are West Bengal, Rajasthan, Madhya Pradesh, Odisha, Gujarat and
Karnataka
 To identify Livelihoods CRPs and other best practitioners from among the MKSP partners
in the State and utilize their services for scaling up of the local best practices in other
intensive blocks of the State
 Organize exposure visits for the SHG members to the best practice sites of the agro
ecological farming practice covered by the MKSP partners to support scaling up of best
practices to other areas.
7.3 Poorest of Poor strategy roll out through CMSA to support agriculture based livelihoods
SERP is currently supporting roll out of Community Managed Sustainable Agriculture practices with
a specific focus of Poorest of the Poor (POP) farmers in two resource blocks covering 20 villages in
the States of Rajasthan, Jharkhand, Chhattisgarh, MP and Jammu & Kashmir where sufficient levels
of social mobilization has been completed. First round of CRP drive has been already completed in
the aforementioned states with the support of CMSA CRPs, drawn from the pool of community
resource on CMSA implementation developed in Andhra Pradesh. A debriefing workshop with the
external CRPs and the state missions of the abovementioned states is planned in September 2014,
to take the learning from the first round and develop strategies for next 3 quarters. The state
missions will focus on identification of best practitioners who will be groomed continuously to scale
up the process in other intensive blocks of the state
Action Points (for Rajasthan, Jharkhand, Chhattisgarh and MP):
 Second round of PoP strategy roll out will start in October with the external CRPs from
SERP in the States of Rajasthan, Chhattisgarh, Jharkhand, Jammu Kashmir and MP to
PRC AGENDA
Page 14
deepen the activities initiated during the first round with the PoP families. The State
missions are expected to support the process of deepening of activities.
 N.M.M.U. team will facilitate smooth functioning of Partnership/MoU between SRLM and
SERP
 N.M.M.U. team will participate in the joint review of progress of CMSA in the resource
blocks
 Troubleshoot any issues/bottlenecks arising in the implementation of PoP strategy in
resource blocks
 N.M.M.U. will evaluate the quality of services and provide requisite technical assistance
to both SERP and SRLM for achieving optimum level of outcomes
 N.M.M.U. will assist SRLM and SERP in identifying District and State anchors to be
deployed for CMSA roll out in the resource blocks and guide them from time to time.
VIII: Social inclusion and Social Development
8.1
Agenda Points:
 NRLM is undertaking special projects for different vulnerable categories like trafficked
survivors, persons engaged in unhygienic occupations, persons with disabilities, bonded
labour, elderly persons, etc. Currently, the implementation of 3 pilot projects has been
started in respective states a) Anti-Human Trafficking (AHT) - Andhra Pradesh,
Maharashtra, Karnataka, Odisha, Kerala; b) Persons engaged in Unhygienic Occupations
(PEiHO) - Maharashtra, and Persons with Disabilities (PwDs)- Andhra Pradesh,
Maharashtra.
 NRLM has conducted a video conference to review the status of implementation of pilot
projects in the month of August. Status of pilot projects is enclosed as Annexure IX.
 Two pilot projects has been implemented by BRLPS and MPSRLM in collaboration with
UN Women for developing gender aspect into the livelihood initiatives by providing
gender training to CBOs and Mission staff. UN Women has identified an agency named
‘Anandi’ which is helping SRLMs in building the capacity of CRPs. UN Women has
organized workshops in these 2 SRLMs for planning of activities, designing modules etc.
 Jeevika- BRLPS had signed a MoU with Mahila Samakhya to train SHG members
on gender aspects. 47 VOs have been trained on 2 modules named “Kamal
Kamli” and “Mahila PehchanPatra”.
 MPSRLM had identified and trained 40 Master Trainers for providing training to
CRPs and SHGs with the help of UN Women.
 UNICEF has approached NMMU for piloting a new initiative called “Swabhimaan” for
enhancing the nutrition of rural women by integrated nutrition-livelihood-health-watersanitation intervention by providing ‘Nutrition Investment Fund’ to Village
Organizations of NRLM in 3 States viz. Odisha, Jharkhand and Chhattisgarh. NMMU
PRC AGENDA
Page 15
facilitated UNICEF to have discussion with these SRLMs. The above mentioned SRLMs
may give views on this proposal of UNICEF.
 Prime Minister of India announced “Swacch Bharat Mission” and NRLM has been given
mandate to institutionalize orientation about sanitation/construction and use of toilets
in a structured way through SHGs by making it an integral part of their activities. In this
regard, an advisory note has been issued to States requesting them to prepare an
action plan on Sanitation and also to develop IEC material.
 To address the issue of elderly, NMMU has received a proposal from Help-Age India
(supported by GIZ). Help-Age India is already working with elderly women SHGs in
Andhra Pradesh, Bihar and Tamil Nadu and now approached NMMU to integrate their
model with NRLM. Accordingly, an exposure visit is being organized to see the model of
Help-Age India in Bihar and Tamil Nadu in which representatives of Andhra Pradesh,
Bihar, Odisha, Jharkhand SRLMs will also participate.
 A National workshop is proposed to be organized by NMMU to conceptualize different
aspects of Social Inclusion and Development by bringing all SI&SD thematic anchors.
IX. Monitoring, Evaluation and MIS:
9.1Digitization of SHG Profile
A significant progress has been made in the creation of national SHG database. As of August
2014, profiles of 25.42 lakh SHGs have been uploaded of which 15.83 lakh SHGs are from the
intensive blocks.
Action Points:
 All SRLMs should ensure that the profiles of SHGs promoted or revived in the intensive
blocks are uploaded on the NRLM-MIS portal.
 SRLMs of Bihar and Tamil Nadu should share the digitized SHG profiles in the suggested
format for uploading on NRLM-MIS portal.
 SRLMs may also use the data for their reviews and monitoring.
9.2 Monthly Progress Reports (MPRs) and Quarterly Progress Reports (QPRs)
An online MPR module has been developed and hosted on the NRLM-MIS portal. The States are
required to use the application to upload their monthly progress reports. All the State Missions
have been uploading the MPRs regularly. Fifteen progress reports on key indicators of NRLM
have been developed and placed on the portal. However, it is not clear to what extent to what
extent the State Missions are using the MPR information for decision support.
A Quarterly Progress Report template has been circulated among the SRLMs. However, SRLMs
have not been sending the QPRs. The report may use the data which is being fed into the
National system to create quality analytical reports.
PRC AGENDA
Page 16
Action Points:
 All SRLMs are required to use the MPR information for decision making, monitoring and
review by instituting appropriate systems.
 All SRLMs are required to provide a structured training to their MIS staff and data entry
operators and frontline community resource persons in data collection and compilation.
 All SRLMs are required to submit QPRs covering both quantitative and qualitative progress.
9.3 Establishment of Systems of Data Collection for MPR
No uniform system of collection and compilation of data from SHGs is observed in the States.
Some SRLMs have instituted base registers from which information required for MPR is sourced.
In certain States, information is collected directly from SHG books of account every month.
Similarly, no uniformity is observed in the persons employed for collection of information. There
is no built in system for quality assurance of data collection from SHGs.
Action Points:
 SRLMs are required to identify and position point persons (CRPs/MBKs/Activists) for the
purpose of collecting data required for MPRs. The SRLMs are also required necessary
capacity building for the point persons
 Suitable systems should also be designed for monitoring the quality and timeliness of
collection of data.
 SRLMs sourcing the report card information from their own MIS application need to sort out
porting related issues if any with the NRLM- NIC team
9.4 Appointment and Capacity Building of M&E and MIS Professionals
A considerable number of M&E and MIS positions at SMMUs and DMMUs remain to be filled. A
critical shortage of data entry operators at BMMUs is also observed. Further, not all BMMUs
are provided the required ICT infrastructure and internet connectivity to facilitate
implementation of MIS. As of date, only 17 out of 27 Mission States have dedicated MIS
persons at SMMU level, while only 75 intensive districts out of 171 districts have dedicated MIS
professionals (excluding AP and Kerala) at the DMMU level.
Action Points:



All SRLMs should recruit and position M&E and MIS professionals at the SMMU and
DMMU levels without further delay. All SRLMs should provide ICT infrastructure and
internet connectivity to all intensive blocks as per guidelines outlined in OM File No: M13015/05/2013- NRLM dated 3rd February 2014.
MIS Consultants and DEOs may be hired or outsourced as per requirement of SRLM for
different levels till regular appointment of professionals is made.
All SRLMs are required to provide infrastructure and connectivity for the MIS data centers
at the DMMU and BMMU levels without further delay.
PRC AGENDA
Page 17
9.5 Uploading of HR Details
All SRLMs are required to upload their SMMU, DMMU and BMMU/PFT HR details in the NRLM
portal. A significant progress has been made on this front. However, additional staff details are
not uploaded as and when the appointments are made. Similarly details of attrition are not
uploaded.
Action Point:
 It is incumbent on the part of all SRLMs to dynamically update the HR details. As
communicated earlier, MoRD will use only HR information available on the portal for review
and monitoring.
9.6 MIS Agencies
In addition to adopting NRLM-MIS modules (SHG profile, HR module, MPR) designed and
developed by NIC, the SRLMs may decide to have a independent MIS application developed. As
of date, 8 states have contracted the services of MIS developing agencies.NMMU has issued an
advisory to guide the States in the procurement of MIS agencies. (Annexure X)
Action Points:
 All SRLMs may expedite the process of hiring the MIS agency in line with the advisory issued.
 J&K Mission has come up with a low cost MIS application and other Missions may examine
the application and take steps to design and develop similar low cost and modular models of
MIS focusing on community institutions.
9.7 Baseline Survey
The NRLM/NRLP states are required to commission baseline studies. To facilitate the process,
NMMU has provided sample EOI and TORs to the State Missions. However, Baseline study is in
progress only in the States of Jharkhand, Maharashtra and Madhya Pradesh. The status of
other States is furnished in Annexure X.
Action Points:
 All State Missions should expedite the procurement of agencies and complete the study by
December, 2014.
X. Financial Management:
10.1 Closure report of SGSY:
SRLMs were requested to submit a final/interim closure report indicating the position of SGSY
Audit reports and evacuation of the un-utilized funds under SGSY to the SRLM accounts, by 31 st
July, 2014. Only the States of Tamilnadu, Chattisgarh and Mizoram have sent final closure
reports. However, Mizoram has not provided report in the prescribed format. Karnataka has
sent an interim closure report. This needs to be expedited.
PRC AGENDA
Page 18
10.2 Audit of Accounts for the year 2013-14:
The current status of appointment of Statutory Auditors by SRLMs is as under:
Assam. Bihar, Chhattisgarh, Gujarat, Jharkhand, M.P., Maharashtra, Odisha,
Rajasthan, Tamil nadu, U.P., West Bengal have appointed Statutory auditors.

Karnataka, Tamil Nadu and West Bengal have started the process of
appointment.
SRLMs should complete the process of appointment of Auditors and ensure submission of Audit
report to Ministry latest by 15th September 2014.
10.3 Roll out of Tally based Accounting System (FMS)
NMMU is coordinating with Tally Solutions Pvt Ltd., to provide solution for practical problem
being faced in preparing IUFRs. In the last bi-monthly Finance Review Meeting held on 10th and
11th June at Bhopal necessary inputs and action plan for implementation of Tally (FMS) were
provided. Accordingly, most SRLMs have procured and installed Tally software. Accounts are
being maintained in Tally-FMS for the financial year 2014-15 and IUFRs for individual
accountings centers are being generated. The software is being updated to provide
consolidated IUFRs, which is likely to be completed by October end. All SRLMs that have not yet
procured and installed Tally solutions are required to do so immediately and also train all their
FM staff on the same.
10.4 Liquidation of SGSY unspent balances:
In the last Performance Review Committee (PRC) meeting held on 5th June 2014, it was agreed
that the excess unspent balances, including SGSY balances, in the SRLM accounts that cannot be
utilized during the course of the year may be surrendered to the Ministry. Concurrence of
Ministry’s Integrated Finance Division is being sought on the issue. Once the concurrence/advice
of the Integrated Finance Division is available, further instructions will be communicated to all
SRLMs.
XI.
Agenda Note on Procurement
11.1 Progress in Procurement of essential Services
Sustained efforts of NMMU, following the Bihar workshop on procurement, are yielding good
results ,except in respect of procurement of MIS services. NRLP states (other than Bihar) have
completed 34 out of 96 identified procurements, while 25 others are at RFP/ Technical
Evaluation stage, which are expected to be completed by October/ November 2014.However,
there are two areas which require improvement.
11.2
MIS:
Out of 13 NRLP states , only 4 ( Bihar,Gujarat, Jharkhand and Rajasthan) have contracted the
services of MIS Agency. The other states are still at the initial stage of developing TORs and
seeking approvals. A review of the MIS procurement proposals/ TORs of these states reveals a
PRC AGENDA
Page 19
great deal of diversity in the scope of work/ services, estimated costs and the projected time
required for design and development of the MIS application. The cost estimates made by states
vary between Rs. 25 lakhs and Rs.10 crores. Moreover, the actual time taken for design and
development of MIS far exceeds the projected time in a few states.
On the contrary ,Jammu & Kashmir, a non -NRLP state and Jharkhand ,a NRLP state, have got
their MIS systems designed ,developed and rolled out in less than 4 months and at a cost of
about Rs.30 lakhs each. Both the applications are functioning efficiently and are found to be
adequate to meet the Mission requirements.
As most of the NRLP states are in their second/ third year of implementation, establishment of
MIS system brooks no further delay.
Action Points:
-
-
11.3
SRLMs are required to make a realistic assessment of their MIS needs and come up with a
suitable ToR, preferably choosing a modular approach, along the lines of Jharkhand and
Jammu & Kashmir systems in place.
Advisory issued by MoRD (NIC), may be considered in developing their MIS requirements.
Cost estimates may be made realistically, drawing from the experience of other states
such as Jharkhand and Jammu & Kashmir.
The time involved in the procurement process needs to be significantly reduced.
States requiring technical support for procurement are encouraged to use the services of
BRLPS, a NRO identified for this purpose at no cost to States.
Baseline Studies
Three states have completed procurement (Jharkhand, MP and Maharashtra) of consulting
agencies for conduct of Baseline Studies, while 8 states are in the advanced stage of
procurement. Other states are in the initial stages of procurement. Across the states, a long time
delay has been observed in the procurement process at every stage. Longest delay is observed
between EOI and RFP stages. Delays are also observed in the technical evaluation stage.
Action Points
-
11.4
All states are required to complete procurement process at each stage as per the
suggested time lines.
States requiring technical support may access NMMU-NRO services.
Prior review request should accompanied by all documents indicated in the OM (File No
J-11060/30/2014-RL (FTS No 35343) dated 16th April, 2014 to avoid delays.
Statutory Audit
In respect of statutory audit services 8 states have completed procurement while 4 states are at
the advanced stage of completion. Other states need to initiate the process.
-
All states are required to complete procurement of Statutory Audit Services and ensure
that audit report is submitted by end of Sep 14.
PRC AGENDA
Page 20
11.5
FMTSA & Internal Audit
Five states (C.G, Odisha, Gujarat, Jharkhand and Rajasthan) have contracted the services of
Financial Management Technical Support Agency. While two states (Assam and Maharashtra)
are at advanced stage. Whereas, two states (Maharashtra and Rajasthan) have completed
procurement of internal audit and three states (Assam, Chhattisgarh and Gujarat) are at advance
stage. Other states need to speed up the process of procurement of FMTSA and Internal
Auditors.
Action Point:
-
11.6
In order to strengthen the fiduciary systems, the states are required to completed
procurement of FMTSA and Internal Audit by the end of Sep/Oct 2014.
Procurement staff
Only nine NRLP states have dedicated Procurement staff at the SMMU level. States of
Assam, Karnataka and Uttar Pradesh do not have dedicated procurement staff at SMMU
level.
Action Point
-
-
All states are required to ensure appointment of procurement staff on a priority basis.
-
States requiring support may also access services of BRLPS (NRO) for completing their
procurement of essential services.
Simplification of Processes and Forms.
PRC AGENDA
Page 21
Annexure I
Human Resource Status: Progress up to Mar, 2014
S.
No.
State
Positions
Approved
Positions Filled in
1
Chhattisgarh
144
121
84%
2
Assam
461
277
60%
3
Madhya Pradesh
891
841
94%
4
Maharashtra
487
361
74%
5
Bihar
1,440
1,015
70%
6
Gujarat
392
307
78%
7
Tamil Nadu
484
334
69%
8
Rajasthan
151
61
40%
9
Jharkhand
624
274
44%
10
West Bengal
317
89
28%
11
Uttar Pradesh
273
185
68%
12
Karnataka
183
149
81%
13
Odisha
760
92
12%
6,607
4,106
62%
Total NRLP States
Positions
Filled
14
Nagaland
106
96
91%
15
Mizoram
34
31
91%
16
Meghalaya
53
30
57%
17
Tripura
142
42
30%
18
Himachal Pradesh
50
36
72%
19
Punjab
103
60
58%
PRC AGENDA
Page 22
20
Haryana
50
31
62%
21
Uttarakhand
50
36
72%
22
Jammu & Kashmir
NA
NA
NA
23
Manipur
NA
NA
NA
24
Sikkim
NA
NA
NA
25
Arunachal Pradesh
NA
NA
NA
26
Puducherry (UT)
NA
NA
NA
27
Andhra Pradesh
Pre-NRLM-
27
Kerala
Pre-NRLM8,574
62%
Total
PRC AGENDA
13,802
Page 23
Annexure- II
Resource Block Progress – (Up to June, 2014)
SRLM progress report in Resource block rollout (as on 30th April, 2014)
S.
No
Indicator
Chhati
sgarh
Mahar
ashtra
1
No. of Districts
6
4
2
6
10
9
7
41
2
Number of
Resource Blocks
6
8
5
6
10
9
7
49
3
No. of CRP rounds
completed
10
8
7
6
6
6
6
NA
4
Number of villages
entered
588
756
440
431
607
121
225
2677
5
% of villages
covered
74
49
71
37
26
49
45
6
No. of New SHGs
formed
3045
3345
2156
2544
3912
1017
2,556
15,170
7
No. of
old/dormant/
defunct groups
revived
714
1,442
992
857
170
148
0
3,326
8
Total no. of SHGs
supported by SRLM
3759
4787
3145
3401
4082
1165
2,556
18,496
9
Total BPL
Households to be
covered
86031
110,44
5
64,60
3
76186
139,06 18,741
4
10
Total HHs covered
in SHGs
42941
30765
37600
37062
43693
13980
29,151
211,325
11
% of 2 months old
(and above) SHGs
have a bank
account
84
84
81
94
63
98
99
87
12
No. of SHGs eligible
for receiving RF
2,971
3074
2373
2108
3120
682
1,750
12,621
PRC AGENDA
Jhark
hand
MPrad Rajasth
esh
an
Harya
na
J&K
Total
457,964
Page 24
(3-6months)
13
No. of SHGs
received RF
1,847
1764
2046
1388
1890
478
1,474
9,729
14
% of eligible SHGs
received RF
80
57
88
66
74
70
84
77
15
Amount of RF
disbursed (Rs.in
Lakhs)
277.05
254.8
306.9
0
208.2
283.50
72.5
209
3,167
16
No. of SHGs eligible
for receiving CIF
through MCP/MIP
2,142
2,781
1592
1402
960
0
1,222
9,933
17
% of 6 month old
(and above) SHGs
that have prepared
Micro Investment
Plan
27
25
75
277
74
0
1,474
232
18
No. of SHGs
received CIF
627
393
1507
139
718
0
1,222
3,612
19
Amount of CIF
disbursed (Rs.in
lakhs)
351
209.69
753.5
166.2
789.80
0
489.1
1,410
20
% of 6 months old
(and above) SHGs
credit linked to
Banks
78
12.3
25
5
18
293
53
21
Amount of credit
leveraged from
Banks (Rs.in lakhs)
457.89
226.5
98.9
7.50 135.95
146.5
1,276
22
No of community
professionals
identified for
supporting SHGs
(excluding
Bookkeepers)
1,011
680
675
1135
1,142
5,494
PRC AGENDA
1040
962
77
Page 25
23
No. of community
professionals
trained for working
in the villages
(excluding Bookkeepers)
333
334
465
218
270
50
256
1,397
24
No. of Villages
where 6 months of
CRP work is
completed
277
360
242
153
166
80
120
1,398
25
No. of Sr. CRP
rounds completed
5
2
3
0
0
0
2
9
26
No. of Village
Organizations
formed
122
72
104
0
0
33
202
542
27
No. of Village
Organizations
received training by
Sr. CRP teams
122
72
104
0
0
0
202
411
28
No. of Village
Organizations
received startup
cost
95
64
74
0
0
0
202
335
Schedule for the
next CRP round
Chhattis
garh
Maha
rashtra
Jhar
khand
Madhya
Pradesh
Raja
sthan
Haryana
Start-up meeting
11th
Sept
2014
Middle 28th
of
Sept
Octobe 2014
r 2014
Middl
e of
Nove
mber
2014
11th
August
2014
Middl
e of
August
2014
Debriefing meeting
26th
Octob
er’14
End of
Novem
berDec
ember
2014
PRC AGENDA
12th
Nove
mber
2014
End of 24th
Decem Sept
ber
2014
2014
J&K
Last
week
of
Sept
2014
Page 26
Annexure - III
State Wise Status of Disbursement of Interest Subvention to SHGS - 2013-14
Category - I districts
State Name
SL
No. of SHGs
benefitted
Amount
Interest
Subvention
Category - II districts
of
No. of SHGs
benefitted
(Rs Cr)
1
ANDHRA PRADESH
375372
276.19
2
ARUNACHAL
PRADESH
152
0.01
3
ASSAM
2792
0.52
4
BIHAR
26433
2.01
5
CHHATISGARH
8665
6
GOA
7
Amount
Interest
Subvention
Grand Total
of
No. of SHGs
benefitted
Subvention
(Rs Cr)
(Rs Cr)
177.34
1054312
453.53
0
152
0.01
457
0.06
2792
0.52
274
0.027
26707
2.04
0.31
0
8665
0.31
1646
0.3
0
1646
0.3
GUJARAT
6957
0.31
0.1
6957
0.41
8
HARYANA
873
0.31
0
873
0.31
9
HIMACHAL
PRADESH
2211
0.24
0
2211
0.24
600
0.11
0
600
0.11
11 JHARKHAND
5553
0.60
0
5553
0.60
12 KARNATAKA
63085
11.95
5363
2.55
68448
14.50
13 KERALA
11942
2.20
9460
3.15
21402
5.35
14 MADHYA PRADESH
3383
0.24
0
3383
0.24
15 MAHARASHTRA
17505
2.47
0
17505
2.47
16 MANIPUR
94
0.003
0
94
0.003
17 MIZORAM
35
0.01
0
35
0.01
18 NAGALAND
61
0.003
0
61
0.003
19 ODISHA
108843
22.99
0
108843
22.99
10 JAMMU
KASHMIR
PRC AGENDA
AND
678940
Amount
of Interest
Page 27
20 PUNJAB
306
0.03
0
306
0.03
21 RAJASTHAN
3284
0.53
0
3284
0.53
22 SIKKIM
78
0.01
0
78
0.01
23 TAMIL NADU
84481
18.78
0.005
84512
18.78
24 TRIPURA
682
0.05
0
682
0.05
25 UTTAR PRADESH
1790
0.25
0
1790
0.25
26 UTTARAKHAND
757
0.05
0
757
0.05
27 WEST BENGAL
78307
2.87
0
78307
2.87
805888
343.35
183.23
1500413
526.58
Total
PRC AGENDA
31
694525
Page 28
Annexure – IV
SHG-Bank Credit Linkage Achievements
*Amount in Crores
SL
State
Credit
Linkage
Target
2013 – 14
No. of SHGs
Amount
Achievement
2013-14
Achievement (% of
target for FY13-14)
1
AP
12000
432239
11811.90
98.43%
2
Tamil Nadu
6000
264576
5358.80
89.31%
3
Karnataka
4125
109126
1542.95
37.40%
4
West Bengal
1100
110371
728.79
66.25%
5
Maharashtra
1000
62198
539.90
53.99%
6
Kerala
1000
109435
470.61
47.06%
7
Orissa
1000
34210
379.38
37.94%
8
Bihar
500
47741
348.85
69.77%
9
MP
395
32796
293.00
74.18%
10
Gujarat
220
11067
112.25
51.02%
11
Assam
315
10140
80.59
25.58%
12
Chhattisgarh
224
12179
72.31
32.28%
13
Rajasthan
300
6466
47.77
15.92%
14
Haryana
104
2626
21.14
20.33%
15
UP
750
26349
20.51
2.73%
16
Punjab
40
1920
9.38
23.44%
17
Uttrakhand
128
2238
9.05
7.07%
18
Nagaland
10.4
562
8.48
81.56%
19
Jharkhand
214
2134
6.42
3.00%
20
Himachal
89
737
4.98
5.59%
PRC AGENDA
Page 29
21
J&K
14
524
4.10
29.28%
22
Meghalaya
8.2
208
3.88
47.33%
23
Sikkim
7.1
4
0.01
0.20%
24
Tripura
388
NA
NA
-
25
Mizoram
11.6
NA
NA
-
26
Manipur
14.4
NA
NA
-
27
Arunachal
Pradesh
2.7
NA
NA
-
29960.4
1279846
21875.1
73.01%
Total
PRC AGENDA
Page 30
Annexure – V
SHG Bank Linkage Target for 2014-15
SL
State
No. of SHGs to be
Linked
Amount of Credit
(Rs Cr)
1
Andhra Pradesh
281438
9214
2
Tamil Nadu
300000
6000
3
Telangana
184887
5373
4
Karnataka
225000
2925
5
West Bengal
143435
1018.8
6
Kerala
80000
1000
7
Bihar
165865
941
8
Madhya Pradesh
30000
500
9
Orissa
50000
500
10
Assam
59000
350
11
Maharashtra
40900
300
12
Jharkhand
35000
200
13
Gujarat
17800
132
14
Chhattisgarh
15000
80
15
Rajasthan
14500
77.5
16
Himachal Pradesh
8000
48
17
Haryana
7500
45
18
Uttrakhand
2000
10
19
Punjab
4000
20
20
J&K
4000
20
21
Nagaland
2500
12.5
22
Meghalaya
2500
12.5
PRC AGENDA
Page 31
23
Uttar Pradesh
2000
10
24
Tripura
1500
7.5
25
Mizoram
1500
7.5
26
Manipur
1000
5
27
Sikkim
1000
5
28
Arunachal Pradesh
500
2.5
1685825
28817.14
Total
PRC AGENDA
Page 32
Annexure – VI
List of Completed RSETIs
Sl
State
District
Name of the Total Amount Construction
Released
Bank
status
(lakh)
GRADING
2013
1
AP
Ananthapur
RUDSETI
*
Completed
AA
2
Ranga Reddy
SBH
100.00
Completed
AA
3
Prakasam
RUDSETI
100.00
Completed
AA
4
Medak
SBI
100.00
Completed
A
5
Nizamabad
SBH
100.00
Completed
AA
6
Nalgonda
SBH
100.00
Completed
AA
7
Chhattisgarh
Bilaspur
SBI
100.00
Completed
BA
8
Karnataka
Bagalkot
ING Vysya
100.00
Completed
AA
9
Bidar
DCC
99.02
Completed
AA
10
Bijapur
RUDSETI
93.45
completed
AA
11
Belgam
Syndicate
Bank
100.00
Completed
AA
12
Chikmangulur
Corporation
Bank
60.00
completed
AA
13
Chitradurga
RUDSETI
100.00
completed
AA
14
Davangare
Canara Bank
100.00
completed
AA
15
Dharward
RUDSETI
94.57
completed
AA
16
D.Kannada/Ujjaire
RUDSETI
90.98
completed
AA
17
Gadag
SBI
100.00
completed
BB
18
Gulberga
SBI
80.00
completed
AA
19
Haveri
Vijaya Bank
100.00
completed
AA
20
Kolar
Canara Bank
100.00
completed
AA
21
Kota
100.00
Completed
Not
Available
22
Mandya
100.00
completed
AA
PRC AGENDA
Vijaya Bank
Page 33
23
Mysore
RUDSETI
99.58
completed
AA
24
Udipi
RUDSETI
90.93
completed
AA
25
U.Kannada/Kumpta
Syndicate
Bank
100.00
completed
AA
26
Chikbalapur
Canara Bank
100.00
completed
AA
27
Shimoga
Canara Bank
100.00
completed
AA
28
Banglore Rural
RUDSETI
*
completed
AA
29
Tumkur
SBM
100.00
completed
AA
30 Gujarat
Banaskantha/Palanpur Dena Bank
100.00
completed
BA
31
Patan
Dena Bank
100.00
completed
AA
32
Jamnagar
SBI
100.00
completed
AA
33 Kerala
Kannur
RUDSETI
*
completed
AA
34 Maharashtra Solapur
BOI
100.00
completed
BB
35
Latur
SBI
100.00
completed
AA
36 MP
Ujjain
Bank of India
100.00
Completed
BA
37
Housangabad
CBI
100.00
Completed
CB
38
Narsingpur
CBI
100.00
Completed
A
39
Shahdol
CBI
100.00
Completed
C
40 Odisha
Khorda
RUDSETI
*
completed
AA
41
Kendrapara
SBI
100.00
completed
A
42 Punjab
Ferojpur
OBC
100.00
completed
AA
43
Moga
PSB
100.00
completed
AB
44 Rajasthan
Ajmer
BOB
100.00
completed
BA
45
Banswara
BOB
100.00
completed
CA
46
Pratapgarh
BoB
100.00
completed
CB
47
Sirohi
SBBJ
100.00
completed
AB
PRC AGENDA
Page 34
48
Rajasmand
SBBJ
100.00
completed
BA
49
Udaipur
ICICI
100.00
completed
AA
50
Jaipur
RUDSETI
*
completed
AA
51
Bhilwara
RUDSETI
100.00
completed
A
52 Tamil Nadu
Shivgangai
Canara Bank
100.00
completed
DC
53 Uttrakhand
Udhamsingh Nagar
BoB
100.00
completed
B
54 U P
Agra
RUDSETI
*
completed
AB
55
Ghaziabad
RUDSETI
*
Completed
AA
PRC AGENDA
Page 35
Comparative Grading status of RSETIs - Bank wise
Grade as on 31.03.2012-506 RSETIs
Grade as on 31.3.2013
Category - I
SI
Name of Bank
A+
A
B
C
D
ANNEXURE VII
Total
A
B
Category - II
C
D
Total
AA
AB
BA
BB
AC
AD
BC
BD
CA
CB
CC
CD
DA
DB
DC
DD
Total
Grand
Total
1
Allahabad Bank
0
1
3
3
10
17
7
5
-
-
12
2
1
-
2
-
-
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
6
18
2
Andhra Bank
1
4
6
0
0
11
1
-
-
-
1
9
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
10
11
3
APBIRD
0
0
0
0
0
0
-
-
-
-
0
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
1
4
AGVB
0
0
0
0
2
2
1
-
-
-
1
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
2
5
Bank of Baroda
0
3 24
3
46
2
-
22
5
-
2
2
-
-
-
-
3
1
-
-
1
-
-
25
47
6
Bank of India
0
3
9
5
15
42
4
9
3
2
18
4
-
4
3
1
-
1
4
-
1
1
1
-
-
1
1
22
40
7
Bank of Maharashtra
0
2
3
0
2
7
-
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
5
7
8
Bidar DCC Bank
0
1
0
0
0
1
-
-
-
-
0
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
1
9
Canara Bank
2
5
1
0
23
3
-
-
-
3
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
21
24
10
Central Bank of India
0
1
4
8
30
43
4
8
8
11
Corporation Bank
1
0
0
0
0
1
-
-
-
12
Dena Bank
0
1
3
3
5
12
-
-
13
ICICI Bank
0
2
0
0
0
2
-
14
IDBI BANK
0
0
1
0
0
1
15
Indian Bank
0
3
3
0
1
7
PRC AGENDA
1
5
1
6
1
1
0
1
0
1
2
1
1
1
31
2
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
3
-
-
-
-
2
-
8
39
-
0
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
1
-
-
0
2
-
7
2
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
11
11
-
-
-
0
2
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2
2
-
1
-
-
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
0
1
-
1
1
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
2
-
-
-
-
-
5
7
1
Page 36
16
IOB
0
3
2
3
5
13
3
6
1
1
11
2
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2
13
17
ING Vysya Bank
0
1
0
0
0
1
-
-
-
-
0
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
1
18
J&K Bank
0
0
6
4
2
12
2
4
3
3
12
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
13
19
NABARD, IOB, INB
0
0
0
0
0
0
-
-
-
-
0
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
-
1
1
20
OBC
0
0
2
3
0
5
1
-
-
-
1
2
2
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
4
5
21
Punjab & Sind Bank
0
0
3
0
0
3
-
-
-
-
0
1
1
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
3
3
22
Punjab National Bank
0
4
9
1
15
39
9
-
-
20
9
5
3
1
3
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
21
41
23
RUDSETI
3
0
0
0
26
3
-
-
-
3
2
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
23
26
2
3
1
1
1
21
24
SBBJ
1
2
5
0
0
8
-
-
-
-
0
4
2
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
7
7
25
SBH
0
8
4
0
0
12
3
1
-
-
4
5
3
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
8
12
Grade as on 31.03.2012-506 RSETIs
Grade as on 31.3.2013
Category - I
SI
Name of Bank
A+
A
B
C
26
State Bank of India
1
7
19 26
27
State Bank of Mysore
1
0
0
28
State Bank of Patiala
0
0
29
SBT
0
30
Syndicate Bank
31
UCO Bank
D
Total
A
B
2
32
85
0
1
2
-
2
5
1
8
1
2
0
1
5
6
4
0
0
2 15
6
PRC AGENDA
Category - II
C
1
D
Total
AA
AB
22
12
BA
AC
AD
15
-
-
BC
BD
CA
CB
2
-
-
4
CC
CD
DA
DB
DC
DD
Total
2
-
-
-
-
-
63
105
3
-
42
-
-
-
0
2
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2
2
-
-
-
-
0
2
2
-
2
2
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
8
8
4
-
-
-
-
0
2
2
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
4
4
1
16
6
-
-
1
7
9
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
9
16
3
26
3
1
-
14
5
2
4
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
12
26
2
7
1
0
6
BB
Grand
Total
Page 37
32
Union Bank of India
0
2
7
2
3
14
-
-
1
-
1
1
1
2
2
-
-
-
-
1
4
1
-
-
-
-
1
13
14
33
United Bank of India
2
2
6
1
0
11
4
1
-
-
5
6
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
6
11
34
UGB
0
0
0
0
1
1
-
-
-
-
0
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
1
35
Vijaya Bank
1
2
0
0
0
3
1
-
-
-
1
2
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2
3
133
504
###
40
30
35
6
0
4
5
12
16
7
1
0
1
4
2 310
Total
38
PRC AGENDA
79
147
107
86
77
33
18
214
Page 38
524
Annexure – VIII
Comparative Grading status of RSETIs - State wise
Grade as on 31.03.2012
Grade as on 31.3.2013
Category - I
SI
State
1
Andaman
Nicobar
2
&
Andhra Pradesh
Arunachala
Pradesh
3
Category - II
A+
A
B
C
D
Total
D
Total
A
B
C
AA
AB
BA
BB
AC
BC
BD
0
0
0
1
0
1
-
-
-
-
0
-
-
1
-
-
-
4
12
8
0
0
24
4
-
-
-
4
18
2
-
-
-
0
0
0
0
1
1
-
-
-
-
0
-
-
-
-
Total
Grand
Total
CA
CB
CC
CD
DB
DC
DD
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
1
-
-
-
-
1
-
-
-
-
21
25
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
0
0
4
Assam
0
0
5
3
5
13
6
2
-
-
8
3
1
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
5
13
5
Bihar
1
3
5
6
22
37
10
10
2
1
23
7
-
2
3
-
-
-
2
-
-
-
-
-
1
15
38
6
Chhattisgarh
0
0
2
6
8
16
-
1
1
-
2
2
3
3
6
-
-
-
-
2
-
-
-
-
-
16
18
7
Goa
-
-
-
-
-
0
-
-
-
-
0
-
-
-
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
1
8
Gujarat
1
2
9
7
7
26
-
-
3
-
3
5
-
7
4
-
-
-
5
1
-
-
1
-
-
23
26
9
Haryana
1
0
5
4
2
12
4
2
-
-
6
2
1
-
-
3
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
6
12
0
2
4
2
2
10
-
3
1
-
4
-
3
1
1
-
-
-
-
1
-
-
-
-
-
6
10
0
0
6
4
2
12
2
7
5
3
17
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
1
-
-
-
-
2
19
10
11
Himachal
Pradesh
Jammu
Kashmir
&
12
Jharkhand
0
4
4
5
12
25
5
5
2
-
12
8
-
-
3
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
12
24
13
Karnataka
14
11
4
0
1
30
-
-
-
-
0
29
1
-
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
31
31
14
Kerala
2
8
3
0
1
14
-
-
-
-
0
11
-
2
-
-
-
-
-
1
-
-
-
-
-
14
14
15
Madhya Pradesh
1
3
8
12
16
40
8
4
6
9
27
9
2
3
2
-
-
-
-
5
1
-
-
2
-
24
51
16
Maharashtra
1
5
9
11
9
35
4
7
4
-
15
3
1
-
5
1
1
4
-
-
1
1
-
-
-
17
32
17
Meghalaya
-
-
-
-
-
0
-
-
-
-
0
-
-
-
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
1
18
Mizoram
0
0
0
1
0
1
-
1
-
-
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
0
1
19
Nagaland
0
0
0
1
0
1
-
1
-
-
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
0
1
20
Odisha
2
3
11
8
4
28
14
5
-
1
20
4
1
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
-
-
1
-
8
28
21
Puducherry
-
-
-
-
-
0
-
-
-
-
0
-
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
1
22
Punjab
1
0
5
7
3
16
-
3
-
-
3
4
5
1
2
2
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
14
17
23
Rajasthan
4
4
17
7
1
33
2
2
1
-
5
12
3
5
-
-
-
-
5
2
-
-
-
-
-
27
32
24
Sikkim
-
-
-
-
-
0
-
-
-
-
0
-
-
-
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
1
25
Tamil Nadu 1
10 5
4
6
26
Grade as on 31.03.2012
6
7
2
1
16 7
1
-
1
-
-
-
-
-
1
-
-
1
-
11 27
Grade as on 31.3.2013
Category - I
Category - II
Grand Total
SI
26
27
28
29
State
A+ A B
C
D
TOTAL
0
1
2
0
2
2
9
23
15
Uttrakhand 0
0
3
2
9
Tripura
Uttar
Pradesh
West
Bengal
Total
3
3
8
7
9
PRC AGENDA
D Total
A B
C
5
1
-
-
1
2
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2
19
68
17 15 4
2
38 14
3
2
2
-
2
-
-
3
1
-
-
-
-
27 65
1
7
11
-
1
1
-
2
2
8
-
-
-
-
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
11 13
2
3
19
3
1
1
-
5
5
2
3
2
-
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
13 18
147 38 32 35 6
4
5
12 16 7
1
1
4
2
1 1 1
47 07 33
-
504 86 77 33 17 213
AA AB BA BB AC BC BD CA CB CC CD DB DC DD
Total
31
0
3
523
Page 39
Annexure IX
Status of SI-SD Pilots
Project
States
Status
Actions to be done
 360 Gender CRPs have been identified and trained.
 New timelines will be submitted by all States.
 SERP will conduct a baseline survey of the
 6000 women have been identified which includes trafficking
pilot area in coming 3 months.
survivors and at-risk women.
 OLM will start implementation of pilot in next
SERP, Andhra
month along with the intensive block
 Groups of identified SHG members and adolescent girls have been
Pradesh
strategy.
trained. 30 SHG women has been trained on different skills of
stitching.
 Two training modules/kits has been developed signed on trafficking
for awareness generation.
Anti-Human
Trafficking (AHT)
MSRLM,
Maharashtra
Kudumbashr
e, Kerala
 State and Cluster level consultative workshop on AHT has been
conducted with different stakeholders.
 MAVIM is a partner agency of State to provide technical support for
implementing pilot project. MAVIM has developed Gender CRPs
who will be working in the pilot area.
 State level and block level Consultation meeting of all stakeholders
have been done.
 Gender Resource Persons have been identified.
 Sensitization on AHT at panchayat, ward and neighborhood level has
been done.
 Accredited safe homes and Migration center has been identified at
Chittur, Mananthavadi and Devikulam block
PRC AGENDA
Page 40
 OLM was seeking approval from NMMU for hiring of technical
agency (approval has been given by NMMU).
OLM, Odisha
 Four Gender CRPs had been identified and trained.
 Executive Committee of Block Level Federation and Sarpanches had
been oriented on the Gender CRP guidelines.
 Identification of At- Risk HHs is in process
Person engaged in
Unhygienic
Occupation
(PEiHO)
KSRLM,
Karnataka
 Strategy of implementation and the districts to be covered under
the pilot has been changed on the direction of State Government.
Maharashtra
 Data on the presence of Person engaged in Unhygienic Occupation  New timeline of the pilot project will be
(Manual Scavengers) had been collected.
submitted by the State.
 Identification of Person engaged in Unhygienic Occupation (PEiHO)  A detailed proposal for hiring Jan Sahas as a
HHs and rapport building has been done.
partner would be submitted for approval to
NMMU.
SERP, AP
 Due to partition of State, the area of intervention of pilot has been  Submission of separate proposal for each state
changed (18 blocks in Andhra Pradesh and 12 blocks in Telangana.
(Andhra and Telangana) with specific activities,
timeline, budget and coverage for approval to
NMMU.
Person with
Disabilities (PwDs)
Maharashtra
 64 Self Help Groups have been formed and trained.
 Revolving fund has been released to 26 SHGs
 Training on life skills, leadership etc. had been imparted to SHGs
PRC AGENDA
Page 41
 Detailed proposal on PwDs to be submitted to
NMMU for approval with specific activities,
timeline, budget and coverage.
Annexure X
Status of Procurement of Essential Services: NRLP States
rd
As on 3 Sep 2014
Procurement Status
Sl.No Thematic Area
1
Internally
arranged
2
Not Initiated
TOR/EOI stage
RFP Stage
Final Stage
Completed
Total
Services
3
4
5
6
7
8
Odisha(1)
Gujarat, Karnataka, Assam, C.G,
Jharkhand, Maharashtra
Rajasthan, and TN UP and West
12
and MP (3)
(4)
Bengal (4)
1
Baseline Survey
2
MIS
C.G (1)
Maharashtra,
and WB (3)
3
FMTSA
TN (1)
WB (1)
4
Process
Monitoring
WB (1)
Karnataka,
Assam,
Odisha,
C.G and Gujarat
Maharashtra, and TN
MP (1)
Rajasthan, and UP (4)
(2)
(3)
5
Internal Audit
MP and
WB (1)
Odisha (2)
UP Assam, Karnataka,
MP,TN and Odisha (5)
Karnataka (1)
Karnataka, Jharkhand, Assam, C.G and
TN and UP (4)
Gujarat (3)
Karnataka
Odisha (2)
6
Statutory Audit
7
Office Furniture
MP and Karnataka and WB
Odisha (2) (2)
HR Agency
C.G, MP and
WB (3)
Total
10
8
MP and UP (2)
PRC AGENDA
Gujarat, Jharkhand and
12
Rajasthan (3)
Assam and C.G, Odisha, Gujarat,
Maharashtra Jharkhand and Rajasthan 12
(2)
(5)
Maharashtra
Rajasthan (2)
17
14
12
and
12
Assam,
Gujarat,
and C.G and WB Jharkhand,
MP,
12
(2)
Rajasthan, Maharashtra,
TN and UP (8)
Assam, C.G, Gujarat,
UP (1)
Jharkhand Maharashtra, 12
Rajasthan and TN (7)
Assam,
Gujarat,
Jharkhand, Maharashtra 12
and Rajasthan (5)
Karnataka and Odisha
TN and UP (2)
(2)
11
(Jharkhand) (1)
10
34
96
Page 42
Rural Housing
1.
Feedback of previous meeting Minutes
Details given at Annexure – I.
2.
Core issues causing problems in implementation of the schemes including financial
issues, State specific
Reporting on MIS
Physical
 Gap in reporting on completion against the physical targets and the progress is not
being regularly updated in the MIS by States. The physical progress of completion of
the houses as informed by the States on 30 th August, 2014 was 5,13,320 as against
the completion figure of 2,30,454 houses reflected in MIS.
 Regular updation of information on physical progress relating to completion of
houses, construction of toilets alongwith photographs on weekly basis.
Financial
 Regular updation of information on financial progress relating to total available funds,
expenditure incurred on weekly basis.
Special Projects – Settlement of accounts

Requisite documents are required to be furnished by the State Government for
settlement of accounts and for release of 2nd instalment in respect of funds released
under Special Projects. The state –wise details are given at Annexure –II.
Sanction letter in joint name, if not in name of women

States / UT must ensure that the Sanction Order of the IAY house should be issued
either in the name of the women beneficiaries or jointly in the name of the husband
and wife. It should also be ensured that the same is reflected in the AwaasSoft.
Display of Annual Select list and Logo

State / UT Governments must ensure that the category-wise annual select list of
beneficiaries, including SC/ST, Minorities beneficiaries are displayed at a prominent
place viz., Panchayat Office in the local language. It should also be ensured that the
approved list may be uploaded on the AwaasSoft.

The logo IAY should be displayed on every house constructed under IAY
PRC AGENDA
Page 43
IEC Action Plan and Social Audit

Submission of IEC Action Plan by the State Govts.

Submission of Social Audit Calender by the State Governments
Reply to CAG Report

3.
State Governments to expedite the action taken notes on the audit observations of C &
AG which were forwarded on 28th July, 2014
Guidelines/Policy Matters
 A discussion paper on National Gramin Awaas Mission has been circulated to the State
Governments for comments. The comments on the discussion paper are awaited from 20
States.
4 & 5 MIS System State specific issues and Information Technology related State specific
matters
 e.FMS to on pilot basis in 5 states of the country viz., Haryana, Rajasthan, Tamil Nadu,
Maharashtra and Odisha.
 Reporting of convergence with NBA and MGNREGA
 Delayed data entry during the current financial year in AwaasSoft
6.
Best Practice/Innovations/Case Studies
 Submission of proposals on best practices and innovations in the States for consideration
to scale up at the National level
7.
Pending Grievances/Parliamentary matters
 State Governments to furnish the Action Taken Report (ATR) on complaints and NLM
reports forwarded to them.
 The status of redressal of complaints to be uploaded on AwaasSoft
 Lodging of complaints through Awaassoft should be encouraged to make timely
redressal.
10. 8. Simplification of Processes and Forms
PRC AGENDA
Page 44
Action Taken Report on the Minutes of the PRC meeting held in June, 2014
Sl
no.
Actionable point
1.
Allocation of district wise targets and
release of first instalment 2014-15
Responsibility
Action Taken
State Govts.
State Govts., to furnish
the ATR
Issue:
The district wise targets were
awaited from States. States requested for
increase in their allocation for 2014-15 and
to transfer targets from earmarked
categories to general category.
Decision:
 The allocation for the year has been
made based on uniform and objective
criteria with data from Census 2011
and same cannot be changed now.
 States have to adhere to category wise
targets communicated by MoRD.
 MoRD to release one-third of the
States allocation to States which are
yet to submit their district wise targets.
States to report district wise details of
targets and funds transferred.
2.
MoRD
Action has already been
taken on the same.
Delays in fund flow
Issue: States like Assam, Uttar Pradesh,
Tamil Nadu were able to receive IAY funds
from State Finance departments, whereas
States like Jharkhand, Kerala were not able
to receive funds within the prescribed time
of three days. The discrepancy in the period
of fund transmission- 10 days in case of
DRDA Administration and 15 days in
schemes of other departments were noted.
States requested that the time limit be
PRC AGENDA
Page 45
rationalised.
Decision:
 MoRD to decide on rationalisation of
prescribed time limit for onward
transfer of central share
3.
MoRD
The matter is under
examination as it is
applicable to all RD
schemes.
Decision:
State Govts.

&
State Govts., to furnish
the ATR
Review of unspent balances
Issue: There are large amounts of scheme
funds lying unutilised in the district and
bank accounts. These are not linked to
release against any sanctioned house.
4.
States to review accounts of all
districts and block level IAY accounts
and recover such unutilised funds.
DRDAs
Convergence
a). With NBA
Issue: Convergence is mandatory and every
sanction of IAY house should have a
mandatory sanction of toilet but it is not
being implemented. The joint guidelines
issued clearly states that the beneficiary
should not have to approach more than one
agency for the purpose. Reports to this
effect are not forthcoming.
States expressed the difficulties
faced in coordinating efforts of the
departments at the ground level, wherever
NBA is implemented by a different agency.
IAY beneficiaries availed of benefits under
TSC but do not have a toilet are ineligible to
PRC AGENDA
Page 46
get assistance under NBA
Decisions:
 States to review convergence measures State Govts.
and submit updated reports for 2013-14.
Discrepancy in reporting through the
two different MIS should also be
addressed.
 States to take measures to implement
the joint guideline issued and to ensure
that the fund disbursing agency for both
schemes is a single agency.
 IAY beneficiaries found ineligible under
NBA may be covered under MGNREGA
for construction of toilets
 Ministry to convey the annual state wise
MoRD
targets under IAY to MoDWS.
b). With MGNREGA
State Govts., to furnish
the ATR
Information has already
been furnished to the
MoDWS.
Issue: Amount eligible for unskilled wage
component in the construction of a house
and modalities for convergence with IAY are
yet to be worked out.
Decision:MoRD to work out amount and
MoRD
modalities
A circular has already
been issued by MGNREGA
division in this regard.
c). With other schemes
Issue: Reporting on convergence with other
schemes like RGGVY, RSBY, AABY, and
MGNREGA is found to be minimal.
State Govts
State Govts., to furnish
the ATR
Decision: States to review status of
convergence and ensure reporting through
AwaasSoft
5.
Monitoring and reporting
Issue: Reporting on AwaasSoft is not State Govts
regular and timely. The gap in between the
reports in MIS and MPR still remains.
PRC AGENDA
Page 47
Requests for training for AwaasSoft and
eFMS from Assam, Gujarat, Maharashtra,
Nagaland and a video conference with
Uttarakhand.
Decisions
 States to register details of MIS Nodal
Officer on AwaasSoft State login and
complete entry of instalment details
and targets immediately
 States to ensure that scheme is
implemented through AwaasSoft and
post dated entries are made within 15
days from actual work
 States to adhere to checks in
AwaasSoft and avoid requests for
relaxation
 States that are entirely using the MIS
may inform MoRD accordingly and
discontinue use of MPR
 To utilise administrative expenditure to
place dedicated man power for the
purpose of data entry and reporting
 MoRD to organize trainings in
consultation with NIC.
Option to edit Opening balance to be given
only before completion of audit and both
values to be captured with dates.
6.
State Govts
State Govts
State Govts., to furnish
the ATR
AwaasSoft Training was
conducted at Nagaland on
26th June, 2014 and at
Tripura on .
State Govts
State Govts.
MoRD/NIC
Special projects
Issue: Submission of proposals for Manual
Scavengers on priority and other deserving
categories after careful examination. States
to consider proposals for demonstration of
good technologies. Reporting of special
projects does not reflect actual progress.
Decisions:
 Submission of consolidated proposals
for 2nd instalments of projects
sanctioned in 2012-13 and 2013-14
 States to ensure reporting of special
projects through AwaasSoft
State Govts.
State Govts., to furnish
the ATR
Guidelines
PRC AGENDA
have
been
Page 48
7.
 MoRD to consider inclusion of people
affected by leprosy, AIDS etc as groups
eligible for Special projects
Operationalisation of guideline provisions
regarding IEC, Social Audit, facilitation and
capacity building
MoRD
amended suitably.
Decisions:
 States to take a policy decision on
targets to be covered under habitation
and scattered approach
 States to compile appropriate design
and technology options for houses and
toilets and disseminate them widely.
Involve SHGs in the process.
State Govts.
 MoRD to help rope in Sulabh MoRD
International in the RHKN efforts
 States to formulate IEC Action plan,
Social Audit calendar and capacity
building plan
State Govts., to furnish
the ATR
A letter dated 8th July,
2014 in this regard was
sent
to
Principal
Investigator,
RHKN
Project. Reply is awaited.
 MoRD to work with Karnataka to study
working of Nirmithi Kendra's in the
State
8.
State specific issues
1. Gujarat: Request for consideration of
some earthquake prone areas in the State
as difficult areas.
Concerned
State Govts.
State Govts., to furnish
the ATR

State to submit proposal according
to guideline for approval of EC
2. Jharkhand : Additional houses were
sanctioned in 2012-13 based on MoRDs
advance intimation

State to adjust sanctions with
allocation for the current year
3.Arunachal Pradesh : Serious issues
regarding the procurement and distribution
of materials was raised in the NLM meeting
held in Guwahati. The State was absent in
PRC AGENDA
Vide our letter dated 27th
August,
2014,
NLM
Division was informed
about the specific points
to be investigated and the
Disitricts/States in which
Page 49
the PRC.

MoRD to send a team to look into
the matter
4. Karnataka: Special project for nomadic
tribes - since they are not part of IAY
waitlist.

State to pose proposal under
homestead sites to provide land and
then claim project under para 3.2.3
of the guideline.
5. Maharashtra: Change in proportion of
instalments
special enquiry is to be
conducted under NLM.
The proposal was placed
in the EC meeting. The
same was approved. File
under submission for
amendment of guidelines.

MoRD to place proposal already
submitted in the forth coming EC
meeting
6. Meghalaya: Addition of four newly
created districts on AwaasSoft

State MIS Nodal officer to
coordinate with NIC and State
NREGA Soft Nodal officer to resolve
the issue of generating new district
codes
7. Sikkim: Request for deletion of existing
data on AwaasSoft

State to submit a detailed request to
MoRD
8.West Bengal: Request for increased unit
assistance for houses to be constructed in
Kala-azar affected areas owing to higher
construction cost there, since houses have
to be constructed on a raised platform.
Increased unit assistance is not possible
hence State may pose a Special project
proposal if considered appropriate.
PRC AGENDA
Page 50
Special projects sanctioned during 2013-14
Name/No. of
district(s)
Purpose
Physical
target
1. AP
10 districts
PTGs
19,999
35.63
Proposal not received
2. Arn.Pradesh
3 districts
Sullung tribes &
Bonded
Labourers
(Puroik
Community)
3,111
10.81
Papumpare proposal recd
without AR. Proposals not
recd from 2 districts.
3. Chhatisgarh
Bijapur
Affected by LWE
643
1.81
Proposal not received
5 districts
Flood victims
334
0.93
Released to 1 dist. 1 with
IFD. 3 proposals not recd.
24 districts
FRA
62,372
180.52
Released to 1 dist. 23
proposals not recd.
Kinnaur
Flood victims
313
0.92
Proposal not received
Churachandpur
Insurgency
2,483
8.38
Proposal not received
Nuapada &
Rayagada
PTG
7,465
21.00
Proposal not received
11 districts
FRA
36,238
105.97
Balasore
Tornado victims
135
0.37
Proposal not received
Bikaner
Flood victims
94
0.26
Proposal not received
Cyclone (Thane)
34,380
93.86
Villupuram
released,
cuddalore proposal not
recd
Sl.
State
No.
6. HP
7. Manipur
8. Odisha
9.
Rajasthan
10. 12.
Tamil Nadu
Cuddalore &
Villupuram
Amount
Second instalment status
released as
1st Inst.
Released 1 dist – under obj
10
11. 13.
Tripura
All districts
FRA
9,862
33.28
4 dists submitted proposals
which
are
under
examination. Rest of the
proposals not received.
14.
Tripura
All districts
Surrendered
Militants
2,051
6.92
Proposals recd from 7
districts
and
under
examination and 1 proposal
not recd.
PRC AGENDA
Page 51
12.
Uttarakhand
13.
14.
5 districts
Flood victims
5,000
14.06
Proposal not received
UP
Lalitpur
Sahariya Tribes
2,904
7.93
Released
MP
4 distts
Silicosis affected
674
1.12
Proposal not received
1,88,058
523.77
Total
PRC AGENDA
Page 52
Special projects sanctioned during 2012-13
S.
State
No.
1. Jharkhand
2.
M.P.
Name/No.
of
district(s)
Purpose
24
Homestead
Incentive
69,500
FRA
53,360
48
Physical
Target
Amount
released
as 1st
Inst.
122.61
Amount of
2nd
installment
Second
instalment
status
36.36
Released
6
dists, 4 with
IFD, 2 under
objection.
Proposals from
12 districts not
received
( 6 districts)
92.12
51.92
(16 districts)
3.
M.P.
50
Homestead
Incentive
30,998
51.64
0.95
(2 districts)
2nd instalment
already
released to 25
districts,
23
districts under
objection
Released to 2
districts.
4. Rajasthan
13
PVTG
43,131
72.78
Proposals
received, which
are
under
examination
5. Rajasthan
5
FRA
25,447
42.94 The State has
been
requesting
for
enhancement
of Unit cost
Proposals
received, which
are
under
examination.
36
under
objection. 12
are
under
examination.
Total
PRC AGENDA
140
2,22,436
Page 53
Socio Economic and Caste Census {SECC 2011}
Action taken on the decision of the PRC meeting held on 06 thJune 2014 is at Annexure I.
Enumeration, Supervision and Verification & Correction
Total of Enumeration Blocks (EBs) Enumeration completed is 99.46%.Some EBs are
pending because of Special Charge EBs, Jurisdiction Error, etc.
Total EBs where Supervision process completed is 99.36%.In some EBs the Supervision
processes are pending because existence of Special Charge EBs, Jurisdiction Error, etc.
Supervision is pending in Delhi (33.19% of EBs), Jharkhand (5.09% of EBs) and Arunachal
Pradesh (0.26% of EBs)
The errors found are very high even after supervisory verification. Many states have
expressed their desire to verify these households before the data is made public (Draft
Publication phase). Data Verification & Correction Module is introduced in the interest of
ensuring accuracy of data. As on 01st September 2014–97.94%Verification & Correction is
completed. Pendency is found in Delhi (24% of EBs), Jharkhand (25%of EBs), Rajasthan
(2%of EBs), Uttar Pradesh (2%of EBs).
Through marginal, the State/UTs governments are requested to complete the
enumeration, supervision and verification and correction process.
The following are some of the issues for taking necessary action:-
Draft list printing
States those who have published draft list (Assam, Karnataka, Meghalaya, Bihar,
Gujarat, Kerala, West Bengal, Daman & Diu, Haryana, Goa, Lakshadweep, Manipur,
Nagaland, Sikkim, Jammu & Kashmir, Jharkhand and Uttar Pradesh)
PRC AGENDA
Page 54
‘D’ File Published is as below
Group I: Status of the Draft list printing as on 01st September 2014is as follows.
NO. OF
SR NO.
STATE NAME
TOTAL
DISTRICTS
Service Provider
DISTRICT
WHERE DRAFT
CPSU
LIST PUBLISHED
PRC AGENDA
1 ANDHRA PRADESH
23
10
ECIL
2 ARUNACHAL PRADESH
16
0
ITI
3 BIHAR
38
38
ECIL
4 CHHATTISGARH
18
0
BEL
5 GOA
2
2
ITI
6 HIMACHAL PRADESH
12
1
ITI
7 KARNATAKA
30
30
BEL
8 MAHARASHTRA
35
0
BEL
9 MEGHALAYA
7
7
ITI
10 NAGALAND
11
11
ECIL
11 ODISHA
30
0
ECIL
12 RAJASTHAN
33
0
BEL
13 SIKKIM
4
4
ECIL
14 UTTARAKHAND
13
0
ITI
15 WEST BENGAL
19
16
ECIL
Total
291
119
Page 55
Group II: Status of the Draft list printing as on 01st September 2014is as follows.
NO. OF
SR
NO.
STATE NAME
TOTAL
DISTRICTS
DISTRIC
WHERE DRAFT
T
LIST
Service Provider
CPSU
PUBLISHED
1
ASSAM
27
27
ECIL
2
GUJARAT
26
26
BEL
3
HARYANA
21
21
BEL
4
JAMMU & KASHMIR
22
22
ITI
5
JHARKHAND
24
11
ECIL
6
KERALA
14
14
ITI
7
MADHYA PRADESH
50
0
ITI
8
MANIPUR
9
9
ITI
9
MIZORAM
8
8
ECIL
10
NCT OF DELHI
9
0
ITI
11
PUNJAB
20
1
ITI
12
TAMILNADU
31
0
BEL
13
TRIPURA
4
0
BEL
14
UTTAR PRADESH
71
17
ITI
Total
336
156
Claims and Objections process and Draft file generation
After verification and correction gets completed, the draft list will be published in
Gram Panchayats and made available in the offices of Gram Panchayat, BDO for perusal
by any person interested in it. The list will also be uploaded in the NIC/ State
Government/UT Administration, Ministry of Rural Development / Ministry of Housing &
Urban Poverty Alleviation website with provision to take a printout.
Out of 639 districts 275 districts have published the draft list. After the publication
of the draft listand display in the Gram Panchayats, the list will need to be read out in the
PRC AGENDA
Page 56
Gram Sabha meeting. All claims and objections raised in the Gram Sabha meeting will be
recorded and will be disposed of by the designated officers.
Necessary instruction regarding Claims and Objections has been issued by the
MoRD and MoHUPA.
The period for completing claims and objections would be minimum of 45 days
and maximum of 82 days from the day of publication of the draft list. The State
Government/UT Administration will have to notify officers who will be competent to take
a decision as Panchayat Level Officer (PLO), Designated Officers and Appellate Officers
.Persons not satisfied with their decision may appeal at the district level to the
AppellateOfficer. The appeal should normally be disposed of within two weeks. The
Designated Officers to hear Claims and Objections should be notified in the districts well
in advance.
The circulars issue by MoRD in this regards are as follows

17May 2012 – A Circular for Instruction manual of Claims and Objectionsin rural
areas

30 Nov 2012 – A Circular for beyond 45 days to 82 days of Claims and Objections
period for rural areas

24 May 2013 – Protocol for the publication of Draft List and Final list of SECC
2011.

30 Jul 2013 – A Circular for revised days of Claims and Objections from 82 days to
45 days
Final List
A Final list will be published after completion of Claims and Objection process,
which will be sent to all Panchayats, all Block Offices and any other offices of the State/UT
as considered appropriate. The final list will also be uploaded in the NIC/ State
Government/ UT Administration /Ministry of Rural Development / Ministry of Housing &
Urban Poverty Alleviation website.

05 Aug 2013 – A Circular for Final list publication software deployed by BEL.

28 Aug 2014 – Final list publication software version 2.0.1 deployed by BEL.
PRC AGENDA
Page 57
The flow chart on Claims and Objection process and Final list publication is at Annexure
II. States are advised to visit sec-census.nic.in and monitor their progress and find
instruction, etc. The public website secc.gov.in may also be seen.
Cast Correction
Verification and Correction module was introduced for quality of return in case of
household parameter including caste. Caste correction is pending in NCT of Delhi,
Rajasthan, Uttar Pradesh, Tripura, Jharkhand and Madhya Pradesh. These states are to
upload the V & C files after doing the corrections. Invalid caste is still found after the
Verification and Correction round. High invalid caste data is found in Jammu & Kashmir,
Punjab, Uttar Pradesh, Sikkim, Mizoram, Tripura, Assam, West Bengal, Odisha, Madhya
Pradesh, Maharashtra, Karnataka, Goa, Kerala, Puducherry, and Andaman & Nicobar
Island. In consultation with ORGI, it was decided to request the state government to
correct the invalid caste again. Both NIC and CPSUs would help the states to do this job.
However, this can be done without hampering and delaying the Claims and Objection
process. 2nd round of caste correction can be done independent of the Claims and
Objection process.
Funds for SECC
The State/UTs were given funds for the activities that are there responsibility.
These activities are Enumeration, Supervision, Claims and Objection. All State/UTs have
required 95% of the estimated dues to them for expenditure towards SECC. Details are at
Annexure – III
PRC AGENDA
Page 58
Annexure I
Minutes and Action Points of the PRC Meeting held on 6th June 2014
S. No.
1.
2.
Issues & Decisions
Some of the States asked for a direction from Ministry
of Rural Development (MoRD) as to, at what
rate/percentage of completion of merging of National
Population Register (NPR)–SECC data can one go for
generation of Draft List? The answer needs a few initial
clarifications. A portion of SECC data has been taken
from NPR base data. These pertain to individual
particulars columns 2 to 9 of the questionnaire used for
data collection. Actually this portion is entering as a
scanned document and entered in to the Tablet
Personal Computers (TPCs) and in it additional data is
collected and added. For computational purposes the
scanned portion data need be converted into digital
format and merged with SECC data. For successful
merging of data two steps are to be accomplished; (i).
EBs has to be matched and (ii) members have to be
matched. The EBs of NPR and that of SECC are matched
through For Read statements and a process of
Concordance. It was generally felt that the States need
not wait for 100 per cent matching of EBs to be
completed before draft list generation. Complete
matching may not work out due to various reasons
such as improper For–Read matching and incomplete
implementation of multiple level concordances of EBs.
But it was felt in the meeting that a reasonable
threshold level of ensuring matching of EBs was to be
fixed and informed to all States /UTs. It is considered
that a minimum of 95 per cent of matching of EBs
could be a reasonable threshold level for generation of
‘draft’ and ‘final’ list. If the States are not able to
achieve the proposed levels (95%) then MoRD/NIC
/ORGI will probe into the plausible reasons and
indicate immediate corrective action at the earliest.
The EBs that were not matched at the stage of ‘draft’
list and ‘final’ list generation and publication, are to be
matched after ORGI and State Directorates of Census
Operations (DCOs) suggest a matching methodology or
suggest dropping of such EBs after due consultation
with States/UTs.
Cent per cent image uploading is one of the key
requirements of SECC. But in practice the image upload
rates are lagging behind NPR-SECC merging rates
achieved. Uploading all the NPR images is one among
the main deliverables by CPSUs. The CPSUs (or their
Vendors) uploaded these images in the TPCs in the first
instance and made use for survey of households. The
same images have to be uploaded in the central server
of NIC and kept in possession of the CPSUs. But, M/S.
ITI have not uploaded 4.52 % of images of J&K , 18.97
PRC AGENDA
Responsibility Update on Action taken
MoRD, ORGI, The States/UTs and CPSUs
NIC
were informed to ensure that
a minimum of 95 per cent EB
level matching is ensured for
successful merging of NPR
and SECC data. Only on
achieving the desired level,
permission is given to
generate draft list files. The
performance of States/and
UTs in these regard are
currently at various levels.
MoRD, CPSU, Instructions were issued to all
State/UT
States/UTs to ensure cent per
Govts
cent image upload in central
server. But in practice this
100% image upload has not
achieved practicable due to
filed
level
problems.
Exemptions to complete
upload of images was
permitted by MoRD on the
Page 59
3.
4.
% of Punjab, 11.67% in NCT of Delhi, 12.14 % of Uttar
Pradesh, and 9.88% in Madhya Pradesh. M/S. BEL have
not uploaded 20.24 % of images of Rajasthan, 35.72%
in Chhattisgarh, 33.44 % in Maharashtra, and 15.16 %
in Puducherry. Similarly M/S. ECIL has not yet uploaded
images of 4.52 % of EBs of West Bengal, 16.34% in
Jharkhand and 12.42% in Odisha. That the CPSUs not
uploading all the image files is a matter of concern.
Without 100 per cent image upload, draft list
generation cannot be permitted. Non- uploading of
images have lead to instances of blank data in the draft
list. The CPSUs are directed to complete image
uploading within a week. MoRD will issue necessary
directions to CPSUs to comply
The individuals’ scanned particulars recouped from the
NPR data need be matched with SECC individual data
particulars from the field for successful merging of
both, for making these two sets of data digitally
compatible. The criteria for machine matching of
available member’s data are year of birth (YoB) and
gender (Sex) of a particular member. In practice a
mismatch of these criteria has happened on a large
scale in the field level due to various reasons. Perhaps
the respondents were not the same and so gave
discrepant responses at the time of enumerations. The
discrepant time factors of both the surveys have also
led to mismatch of responses. And above all the data
was collected on a respondent based mode. Personal
level mismatch may also arise as NPR has two options
for recording sex (male/female), but SECC has three
options (male/female/transgender). So the threshold
level for merging of available member’s details of SECC
with that of NPR needs to be fixed. It is suggested to be
fixed at 80 percent. MoRD has to insist that CPSUs
complete maximum merging of all available member
particulars ofeach EB. If due to unforeseen difficulties,
this threshold level merging cannot be reached then
balance portion pending plus unmet target will have to
be manually done. Separate guidelines will have to be
issued by MoRD in consultation with ORGI.
i) The persistence of duplicate EBs with erroneous
household data replicated in multiples of EBs is
indicated in the website sec-census.nic.in (details given
in the annexure-1). The States/UTs have to
immediately correct these errors with the
technical/manpower help of CPSUs. The only option is
to re-enumerate these EBs. Wherever the numbers of
such EBs are few and it is not feasible for the
States/CPSUs to rectify these EBs immediately, the
reasons with details be informed to MoRD and
submitted by States for correction during Claims and
Objections Processes. MoRD will issue necessary
working instructions in this regard.
(ii) There are few cases of enumeration (E) and
PRC AGENDA
basis of CPSUs appraising the
States/ UTs of the constraints
operating and the later
agreeing to proceed further
to generate draft list, on the
basis of an approved action
plan to resolve these. Where
as if the state concerned has
not reached a minimum of 80
per cent image merging the
draft list generation request
was not recommended to NIC
by MoRD.
MoRD, CPSU, At present we are proceeding
ORGI
ahead with the 80 per cent
cut off achieved of merging of
available member’s data. The
modalities
of
matching
unmerged members details
will be worked out in
consultation with ORGI and
communicated to States/UTs
in due course. Percentage of
NPR – SECC matching person
wise is much below than 80%.
States,
CPSUs
MoRD,
States,
CPSUs
UTs, The EBs with duplicate data
are
being
successfully
corrected by the States/UTs
with the technical manpower
support of the CPSUs, except
Delhi
where
the
reenumeration process is going
on to resolve the duplicate
cases.
UTs,
There has been substantial
improvement in uploading
Page 60
5.
supervision (S) Files of EBs still not uploaded due to
filed level problems. The particulars of these EBs (also
see sec-census.nic.in) are given in Annexure 2. Such a
scenario cannot be allowed to continue as it is, and
publication of draft and final list needs to be with held.
The CPSUs are to complete uploading of these pending
files immediately. If the CPSUS not able to upload the
details, reasons with particulars will have to be
intimated to States/UTs and corrective work especially
under taken during Claims and Objections Processes.
MoRD will issue necessary working instructions in this
regard.
(iii). The prevalence of a small number of unenumerated EBs in some of the States/UTs is also
acting against the efforts to complete the tasks of SECC
in a time bound manner ( see web site sec-census.nic.in
and details are given in Annexure 3). The States, CPSUs
and DCOs will have to undertake a joint exercise to
resolve these cases in a time bound manner. The State
governments will have to certify the numbers, status
and reasons for non enumeration of such EBs and
undertake to complete enumeration during Claims and
Objections Stages before going for final list generation.
MoRD will issue necessary working instructions in this
regard.
As the SECC Survey was in progress it was observed
that in a number of EBs the caste data gathered were
erroneous. A Verification and Correction Module was
introduced and States/UTs were requested to rectify
the mistakes identified as per norms set by ORGI. The
list of generic mistakes was identified, listed and
options given to Sates to correct the same. The
progress as reflected in the Caste Correction Quality
Monitor Reports has been found to be at slow pace. As
per initial criteria, the completion of Verification and
Correction norms fixed by ORGI was also to be
achieved before for the Draft List generation. While
this work was in progress the mid-way review of caste
correction results under taken by ORGI indicated that
much of correction files are uploaded without effecting
the required filed level corrections. A second level C
File correction exercise was imposed with a binding
norm that such second level uploading of corrected C
Files will be permitted in the case of EBs having equal
to or more than 25 erroneous caste corrections only.
Such a norm has been disputed by the States, and
requests have been made to scrap it and permit to go
for draft list generation. The MoRD has examined the
two questions that have come up; (i) whether to scrap
this new constraint imposed linking caste correction
and draft list generation and (ii) whether the draft list
generation is to be linked or not to the completion of
second level caste corrections. In the discussions held
in the PRC it was requested by most States not to block
PRC AGENDA
the pending E and S Files .Yet
in some States marginal
pendency is observed except
MoRD,
All Delhi – 10664 EBs are pending
States/UTs/C and Jharkhand – 366 EBs
PSUS/ORGI
pending as on 1st Sep 2014.
The CPSUS and States/UTs
have been working together
to reduce the number of such
EBs. Substantial progress is
achieved.
NIC/ORGI
At present the Draft List
generation is not mandated
upon Caste Correction work
completion. In the June 2014
PRC meeting, it is requested
to all the States/ UTs to
complete the Caste correction
before the final list but the
Draft List publication should
not be hampered.
The current status is, second
level correction for Caste in
V&C module in most of the
State is legging, since they are
busy for Draft list publication
and COTS procedure.
Page 61
6.
D File generation/ draft list printing contingent upon
caste error corrections. All remaining caste corrections
would be taken care at the end of 2nd level C File
uploading concurrently. A policy decision need be
taken on delinking caste correction and draft list
publication. This will be taken by MoRD at once. At the
same time caste corrections is mandatory and States
and UTs will have to use its own manpower and
financial resources for completing the task. ORGI would
monitor this part of SECC closely and advise MoRD not
to release the due amount to States/UTs, if it is
necessary.
The nature of post-facto updation to be carried out MoRD
after the Final List publication is to be listed and
communicated to States along with timelines. These
would include :i)
Completion of pending digitization and
merging of EB wise unmerged NPR and
SECC data (as mentioned in Para3).
ii) Completion of text data conversion to local
language for new members.
iii) Covering of non enumerated persons and
households.
iv) Opportunity to correct errors that may still
persist in the final list.
7.
8.
9.
i) It is being worked out.
ii) Order is issued to BEL to
start the task.
iii) To be decided upon in
consultation
with
States/UTs.
iv) To be decided upon in
consultation
with
States/UTs
MoRD, NIC, It is being worked out.
States, UTs
The
new
website
www.secc2011.nic.in
is
expected
to
generate
Dynamic Reports on SECC
data for use in analysis and
study.
MoRD, CPSU The CPSUs have been
requested to clear all long
pending
payments
to
Venders/DEOs and DBAs. All
three CPSUs got 95% of the
approved due amount and
have intimated MoRD that
they have disbursed the due
amount to the Vendors.
The modus operandi of sharing, using and updating of
the information presented in the Final list will be
worked out by MoRD/States. The States/UTs may share
the final SECC data proactively with other departments
and local governments and put them to use for
planning, targeting beneficiaries and for other
purposes
The issue of long pending payments by CPSUS to
Venders/DEOs/DBAs came up from many States/UTs. It
was discussed as an issue to be settled by CPSUs
urgently. MoRD would release the remaining amounts
to CPSUs (approximately Rs1000 crore) only after a
certificate mentioning that all payments to
Vendors/DEOs/DBAs are made as per the agreement
between CPSUs and Vendors. MoRD would develop a
format in consultation with the CPSUs in which this
certificate is to be submitted
The States/UTs were asked to complete the entire States/UTs
process before 31.8.2014 without fail. They should
give a deadline for publishing the final list- it must be
intimated to MoRD by 30/6/2014. In the case of UP,
Delhi and Rajasthan, special meetings would be held in
the Ministry.
PRC AGENDA
Much remains to be done.
So far the Final List of SECC is
published in the SECC web
site (secc.gov.in) for Manipur
and for Goa the State has only
to declare the date of
publication. For Karnataka the
State has issued notification
Page 62
of printing the final list on
30/8/14 for five districts.
The Final SECC data base files
are
generated
and
downloaded in part/fully only
in the following States/UTs;
Chandigarh (1/1), Sikkim(1/4),
West Bengal (3/19), Goa(2/2),
Manipur(9/9),
Nagaland(11/11),
Haryana(13/21),
Meghalaya(2/7),
Karnataka(17/30) ;(figures in
brackets give the number of
districts covered out of total ).
On 24 June 2014, Uttar
Pradesh meeting was called.
On 04 July 2014, Rajasthan
meeting was called.
PRC AGENDA
Page 63
PRC AGENDA
Page 64
Annexure - III
Socio Economic and Caste Census 2011 - Fund released Statement
Rs. In Lakhs
Sl.No.
Name of States/UTs
Total Est.
requirement
Released
2009-2010
Released
2011-2012
Released
2013-2014
Released
20142015
1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
2
A&N Islands
Andhra Pradesh
Arunachal Pradesh
Assam
Bihar
Chandigarh
Chhattisgarh
Dadra&N.Haveli
Daman & Diu
Delhi
Goa
Gujarat
Haryana
Himachal Pradesh
Jammu&Kashmir
Jharkhand
Karnataka
Kerala
Lakshadweep
Madhya Pradesh
Maharashtra
Manipur
Meghalaya
Mizoram
Nagaland
Orissa
Pondicherry
Punjab
Rajasthan
Sikkim
Tamil Nadu
Tripura
Uttar Pradesh
Uttarakhand
West Bengal
TOTAL
3
85.37
13107.13
506.43
4465.88
14298.94
145.61
3431.08
47.86
33
2315.05
223
7878.62
3428.08
1740.96
1828.08
4768.97
8795.61
4748.28
8.13
10888.92
15597.95
432.44
642.17
150.05
295.52
6730.29
160.26
3640.87
9568.18
111.99
9455.15
473.36
27458.87
1938.81
12414.52
171815.43
4
5
70.17
10882.84
424.04
3135.6
11571.4
171.17
2809.95
39.41
29.33
2083.55
189.79
6565.37
2833.62
1431.59
1453.7
3933.35
7357.49
3889.23
8.01
9025.68
13133.12
322.11
501.13
117.54
199.09
5550.37
152.08
3021.96
7846.69
81.23
8039.76
317.72
22392.97
1585.87
10480.91
141647.84
6
7
PRC AGENDA
7.4
1015.09
35.28
1067.06
1441.83
0
308.91
3.06
3.15
0
12.12
583.76
279.61
150.3
212.86
398.58
620.62
426.91
1.23
860.39
1005.6
74.54
85.36
19.45
76.24
563.21
15
283.14
849.64
21.73
522.08
120.34
2577.79
176.73
1060.83
14879.84
0
0
0
131
0
0
141
0
0
0
10
336
0
0
70
0
0
195
0
458
680
18
24
0
10
0
0
0
0
3.5
0
12
0
0
252
2340.5
377.00
377
Total
Released
(4+5+6+7)
8
77.57
11897.93
459.32
4333.66
13013.23
171.17
3259.86
42.47
32.48
2083.55
211.91
7485.13
3113.23
1581.89
1736.56
4331.93
8355.11
4511.14
9.24
10344.07
14818.72
414.65
610.49
136.99
285.33
6113.58
167.08
3305.1
8696.33
106.46
8561.84
450.06
24970.76
1762.6
11793.74
159245.18
Balance amount is
to be release (3-8)
9
7.8
1209.2
47.11
132.22
1285.71
-25.56
171.22
5.39
0.52
231.5
11.09
393.49
314.85
159.07
91.52
437.04
440.5
237.14
-1.11
544.85
779.23
17.79
31.68
13.06
10.19
616.71
-6.82
335.77
871.85
5.53
893.31
23.3
2488.11
176.21
620.78
12570.25
Page 65
TRAINING
1.
Sl.
Action taken Report on last PRC meeting Minutes held on 5-6th June, 2014
Issues and Decisions
Action taken by States
Funds will be released for construction
activities by SIRDs/ETCs only after work
order is executed. +
For SIRD - Manipur, For SIRD - Andhra
Meghalaya,
Mizoram, Pradesh,
Haryana,
Nagaland, Sikkim & Uttar Odisha & Uttarakhand
Pradesh
N.
1
Action pending with the
States
For ETC – Haryana, Madhya For ETC - Andhra
Pradesh, Mizoram & Uttar Pradesh, Chhattisgarh &
Pradesh
Odisha
2
States where SIRDs are not autonomous,
should take early decision in granting
autonomous status to the SIRDs.
SIRDs in most of States are States of A.P., H.P.,
autonomous
Jharkhand, Karnataka,
Odisha, Punjab, U.P.
and West Bengal.
3
States should send details of persons to be
deputed for foreign training on rural
development so that the database
maintained by MoRD could be updated.
The Ministry would also forward a
proforma to the States for the purpose.
Andhra Pradesh, Arunachal
Pradesh, Chhattisgarh, Goa,
Gujarat, Haryana, H.P., J&K,
Karnataka, Kerala, M.P.,
Maharashtra, Meghalaya,
Mizoram, Nagaland, Punjab,
Rajasthan, Tamil Nadu,
Uttarakhand
&
Uttar
Pradesh
Assam,
Bihar,
Jharkhand,
Manipur,
Odisha, Sikkim, Tripura
&
West Bengal
4
ETCs should be brought under the
administrative and academic control of
SIRDs for better functional efficiency
Chhattisgarh & Mizoram
Goa, Meghalaya
Himachal Pradesh,
5
BNVs are useful in the Social Sector for
facilitating the delivery of services and
empowerment of Gram Sabha. The
initiative may be scaled up to new areas in
the States.
PRC AGENDA
&
Goa,
Chhattisgarh,
Meghalaya, Mizoram &
Himachal Pradesh
Page 66
6
The revised draft guideline on BNVs will be
discussed in the Colloquium of SIRDs
Discussed in the SIRDs Colloquium held on 11.07.14
proposed later in the year 2013-14.
7
As pending UCs are a major issue, the
States/SIRDs/ETCs should expedite the
utilization of funds and submission of UCs.
Major cases of pending UCs are in the
States of Jammu & Kashmir, Tamil Nadu,
Assam & U.P.
Chhattisgarh
UCs for Rs. 31.33 Cr. are
pending
against
SIRDs/ETCs in 22 States
as per details enclosed.
8
Off campus programmes conducted by
SIRDs as well as those for PRIs will also be
included in the Monthly Progress Report
(MPR) sent by SIRDs and ETCs and MPR
should be sent regularly.
Goa, Himachal Pradesh
Tamil Nadu (RIRD),
Chhattisgarh,
Meghalaya, Mizoram
*Action taken report has been received from the followings States:- Himachal Pradesh
SIRDs - Chhattisgarh, Goa, Himachal Pradesh, J&K, Meghalaya& Mizoram
ETCs - Kurud, Keonjhar, Nongsder & T. Kallupatti
2. Core Issues causing problems in implementation of the Schemes including financial issues, state
specific:



Many proposals for non-recurring grant to SIRDs/ETCs were approved in the meeting of
the Departmental Screening Committee held on 26.09.2013. However, 1 st Instalment to
many SIRDs/ETCs could not be released so far due to non- submission of work order and in
case of some SIRDs/ETCs, release is held up due to non- submission of required
documents.
Delay in submission of proposals.
Vacant position of core faculty members.
Slackness in scaling up Bharat Nirman Volunteers Initiative.
Releases made to the States in the current financial year are as under:
PRC AGENDA
Page 67
Amount Released (2014-15)
S.No.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Name of the State
Andhra Pradesh
Arunachal Pradesh
Assam
Bihar
Chhattisgarh
Goa
Gujarat
Haryana
Himachal Pradesh
Jammu & Kashmir
Jharkhand
Karnataka
Kerala
Madhya Pradesh
Maharashtra
Manipur
Meghalaya
Mizoram
Nagaland
Orissa
Punjab
Rajasthan
Sikkim
TamilNadu
Tripura
Uttarakhand
Uttar Pradesh
West Bengal
Grand Total
PRC AGENDA
SIRDs
ETCs
Total
85.09
106.31
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
68.83
49.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
264.23
0.00
86.40
111.54
193.43
0.00
0.00
66.94
64.34
138.58
1234.71
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
NIL
0.00
514.26
0.00
15.93
0.00
0.00
0.00
68.28
0.00
NIL
0.00
39.46
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
NIL
28.74
NIL
696.11
731.34
0.00
2094.12
85.09
106.31
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
583.09
49.02
15.93
0.00
0.00
0.00
68.28
0.00
0.00
0.00
39.46
264.23
0.00
86.40
111.54
193.43
28.74
0.00
763.05
795.68
138.58
3328.83
Page 68

Unspent grants released to SIRDs/ETCs for non-recurring expenditure for infrastructural
development and for training BNVs are indicated below:(Rs. in lakh)
Sl. States
Institute
Amount released Year of
Unspent
No
Release
Amount
1
Andhra Pradesh
ETC, Baptala
22.44
2010-11
22.44
30.88
2010-11
30.88
24.83
2011-12
24.83
ETC,
18.97
2010-11
18.97
Rajendranagar
50.00
2011-12
50.00
2 Assam
SIRD
18.97
2010-11
18.97
3 Chhattisgarh
ETC, Kurud
4.38
2010-11
2.80
4 Goa
SIRD
32.74
2010-11
32.74
5 Jammu & Kashmir ETC, RS Pura
5.60
2012-13
5.60
6 Jharkhand
SIRD
82.30
2011-12
82.30
OTC
7.21
2012-13
7.21
7 Kerala
SIRD
30.50
2011-12
30.50
OTC
14.62
2010-11
14.62
ETC, Kottarkara
6.98
2010-11
6.98
2.14
2011-12
2.14
ETC, Mannuthy
85.77
2010-11
85.77
15.52
2011-12
15.52
ETC, Taliparmba
15.84
2011-12
15.84
8 Karnataka
SIRD
88.69
2011-12
88.69
ETC, Mysore
3.27
2010-11
3.27
ETC, Gulbarga
8.79
2012-13
8.79
9 Madhya Pradesh
ETC, Nowgong
2.25
2010-11
2.25
10 Maharashtra
OTC
9.71
2010-11
9.71
ETC, Amravati
11.89
2010-11
11.89
7.27
2010-11
7.27
125.20
2010-11
125.20
8.86
2011-12
8.86
ETC, Buldana
11.97
2010-11
11.97
ETC, Gargoti
40.93
2011-12
40.93
29.14
2011-12
29.14
49.32
2011-12
49.32
ETC, Kasba
2.87
2010-11
2.87
Bawda
ETC, Kosbad Hill
3.75
2010-11
3.75
11 Manipur
SIRD
102.82
2011-12
102.82
32.00
2012-13
32.00
12 Mizoram
ETC, Pukpui
18.82
2011-12
18.82
ETC,
6.17
2011-12
6.17
Thingsulthiah
13 Meghalaya
ETC, Nongsder
25.07
2010-11
25.07
2.59
2011-12
2.59
25.07
2012-13
25.07
PRC AGENDA
Page 69
14
15
Nagaland
Odisha
16
Punjab
17
Rajasthan
ETC, Phek
OTC
ETC,
Bhavanipatna
SIRD
ETC, Batala
ETC, Nabha
ETC, Dungarpur
ETC, Mandore
18
Tamil Nadu
19
Tripura
20
Uttar Pradesh
SIRD
OTC
SIRD
OTC
ETC, Afim Ki Kothi
ETC, Bakewar
ETC, Bichpuri
ETC,
Bulandshehar
ETC, Chargaon
21
22
Uttarakhand
West Bengal
Total
PRC AGENDA
ETC, Chiragaon
ETC, Dohrighat
ETC, Ghazipur
OTC, Haldwani
OTC, Haridwar
OTC, Almora
OTC, Dehradun
ETC, Almora
ETC, Haridwar
ETC, Rudrapur
ETC, Cooch Behar
14.29
40.77
26.39
24.20
18.18
79.22
8.25
7.45
52.00
23.35
24.77
2012-13
2011-12
2010-11
2010-11
2012-13
2011-12
2010-11
2010-11
2010-11
2010-11
2010-11
14.29
40.77
26.39
24.20
18.18
79.22
8.25
7.45
52.00
23.35
24.77
34.98
1217.53
4.53
56.12
83.40
43.63
29.45
12.04
13.48
3.81
22.09
2.45
2.32
142.54
2.50
16.14
56.52
6.34
41.68
43.90
51.15
154.51
62.47
108.15
25.40
33.67
84.99
78.00
28.43
97.00
3964.23
2010-11
2011-12
2011-12
2011-12
2012-13
2012-13
2010-11
2011-12
2011-12
2010-11
2010-11
2011-12
2011-12
2012-13
2012-13
2010-11
2012-13
2012-13
2011-12
2010-11
2012-13
2012-13
2012-13
2012-13
2010-11
2011-12
2011-12
2012-13
2010-11
2010-11
34.98
387.94
4.53
56.12
83.40
43.63
29.45
12.04
13.48
3.81
22.09
2.45
2.32
142.54
2.50
16.14
56.52
6.34
41.68
43.90
51.15
154.51
62.47
108.15
25.40
33.67
84.99
78.00
28.43
97.00
3133.06
Page 70
3. Guidelines/Policy matters



4.
As per the discussion held at National colloquium of SIRDs at NIRD, Hyderabad on
11.07.14, BNVs Guidelines are being finalized and will be issued.
Ministry is initiating the revision of guidelines for funding support to SIRDs.
Decision to provide funding support for 2 additional core faculty members.
MIS System State specific issues


The following SIRDs and ETCs are not reporting Monthly progress report either
online or manually: Bihar, Chhattisgarh, Gujarat, Himachal Pradesh, Jammu &
Kashmir, Jharkhand, Maharashtra, Manipur, Meghalaya, Nagaland, Rajasthan,
Sikkim & Tripura
Financial and Physical performance of the States during 2013-14
Achievement under Trainings(2014-15)
S.No
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Name of State
Andhra Pradesh (5)
Arunachal Pradesh(1)
Assam(4+1)
Bihar(3)
Chhattisgarh(1)
Goa
Gujarat(3)
Haryana(1+1)
Himachal Pradesh(1)
Jammu & Kashmir(2)
Jharkhand(2)
Karnataka(5)
Kerala(3)
Madhya Pradesh(7)
Maharashtra(8)
Manipur
Meghalaya(1)
Mizoram(2)
Nagaland(2)
Orissa(3)
Punjab(2)
Rajasthan(3)
Sikkim
TamilNadu(5)
Tripura
PRC AGENDA
SIRD
PC*
532
2
305
0
0
7
115
97
22
0
0
60
9
252
0
0
0
19
0
111
128
16
0
34
0
PA**
15941
96
16152
0
0
169
3525
4136
613
0
0
129891
372
10163
0
0
0
746
0
4258
3074
604
0
1460
0
2014-15
ETC
PC*
PA**
196
7093
0
0
289
19149
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
32
1248
0
0
5
407
0
0
0
0
0
0
97
4616
37
1021
0
0
0
0
21
1049
0
0
10
277
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
PC*
728
2
594
0
0
7
115
129
22
5
0
60
9
349
37
0
0
40
0
121
128
16
0
34
0
Total
PA**
23034
96
35301
0
0
169
3525
5384
613
407
0
129891
372
14779
1021
0
0
1795
0
4535
3074
604
0
1460
0
Page 71
26
27
28
Uttarakhand (5)
Uttar Pradesh(17)
West Bengal(4)
Total
8
66
112
1895
270
2918
2527
196915
6
1043
26
1762
180
44253
1041
80334
14
1109
138
3657
450
47171
3568
277249
PC* - No. of programme Conducted,
PA** - No. of persons who attended training
5.
6.
7.
8.
Information Technology related State specific matters
- Nil Best practice/Innovations/Case studies
- Nil Pending Grievances/Parliamentary Matters
- Nil Annexures
- Nil -
PRC AGENDA
Page 72
District Rural Development Agency (DRDA)
Administration
1. Feedback on previous meeting Minutes
Issue
Action Taken by States (name)
Action pending with
the States (name)
Non release of funds to DRDAs
for 2014-15.
20 State Governments have
released the Central share to
DRDAs.
9 State Governments have
not released Central share so
far i.e. Andhra Pradesh,
Bihar, Jharkhand, Nagaland,
Telengana,
Arunachal
Pradesh, and Manipur. (Uttar
Pradesh
and
Madhya
Pradesh have partly released
funds).
Non receipt of proposals for
release of 1st instalment to
DRDAs during 2014-15
During 2013-14, 47 DRDAs did
not claim 2nd instalment of
funds
under
DRDA
Administration scheme. As
such 1st instalment was not
released to them Till date only
7 DRDAs have claimed 1st
instalment during 2014-15.
Some DRDAs of States of
Uttar
Pradesh,
Bihar,
Haryana, Jammu & Kashmir,
Punjab, Chhattisgarh, West
Bengal, Maharashtra have
not submitted 1st instalment
proposals.
DRDAs
to
submit
2nd
instalment proposals for 201415 after incurring 60 %
expenditure to the Ministry at
the earliest.
Maharashtra (32 DRDAs)
All States.
2. Core issues causing problems in implementation of the schemes including financial issues,
State specific.

7 State Governments have not released central share so far States of Uttar Pradesh
and Madhya Pradesh have partly released central share.
PRC AGENDA
Page 73
Vigilance & Monitoring Committees (VMCs)
1. Feedback on previous meeting Minutes
Issues
Meeting of the State and District Level
VMCs are not being held quarterly in most
of the States and UTs as stipulated in the
Guidelines. States and UTs are to ensure
that the said meetings are held quarterly.
Some of the States suggested that State
Level V&MC should be held once in a year.
It is informed that as per the approval of
Standing
Committee
on
Rural
Development V&MC meeting should be
held quarterly.
Ministry of Rural Development has
requested the States/UTs to start data
entry of Vigilance & Monitoring
Committee meetings in future. To start
with the data entry of the last held
meeting may be uploaded on the website
of
the
Ministry
URL:rural.nic.in/sites/vigilance.asp
Action Taken by States
(name)
Action pending
with the States
(names)
States/UTs
States/UTs
2. Action taken by the State / District authorities on nomination of members for State and
District VMC and issue of notification for reconstitution of VMCs.
2.1 Order regarding Chairman/Co-Chairman of district VMC for all the districts issued. The
district authorities need to issue notification constituting the DVMCs and also nominate the
other members which include:
(i) All Members of the State Legislative Assembly elected from the district.
(ii) One representative of the State Government. / UT Administration.
(iii) Chairperson of the Zilla Panchayat.
(iv) Head of the Autonomous District Council in districts having Schedule VI Areas.
(v) All Chairpersons of Intermediate Panchayats in the district.
(vi) Chief Executive Officer of the Zilla Panchayat.
(vii) Project Director, DRDA/Poverty Alleviation Unit.
(viii) One Member from a reputed NGO, to be nominated by the Chairperson in
consultation with other Members of Parliament in the Committee.
(ix) One Professional from the field of Social Work/ Social Science to be nominated by the
District Collector.
PRC AGENDA
Page 74
(x) One representative each of SC/ST and Women to be nominated by the Chairperson in
consultation with other Members of Parliament in the Committee.
(xi) Lead Bank officer of the district.
(xii) Senior Superintendent/ Superintendent of the Postal Department
Note: For nominating Member from a reputed NGO, one representative each of SC/ST and
Women – to be made by the Chairperson in consultation with other MPs (co-chairpersons) the
district authority to take actions immediately.
2.2
For State VMC, the order relating to nomination of Members of Parliament (LS & RS) is
being issued shortly. The Chairman of the committee is the Minister of Rural Development of the
State/UT and the Secretary-in-charge of Rural Development programmes in the State/UT is the
Member Secretary of the Committee. The other members include:
(i) Five MLAs to be nominated by the State Government out of which two should be from
opposition parties.
(ii) The Secretaries/Heads of Departments of Rural Development, Finance, Public Works
Department dealing with Rural Roads, Revenue, Planning, Agriculture, Animal
Husbandry, Irrigation, PHE, Social Welfare, Cooperation, Forests and Fisheries and
other related Departments.
(iii) Chief Post Master General of the Circle(s) in the State
(iv) Director, Institutional Finance
(v) Managing Director/Head of SC/ST Development Corporation.
(vi) Managing Director /Head of Women’s Development Corporation.
(vii) Managing Director of the Convener Bank of State Level Bankers Committee
(SLBC) as a special invitee
(viii) One representative of KVIC to be nominated by the Ministry of Rural Development,
Government of India.
(ix) Four Non-Official members to be nominated by the Ministry of Rural Development,
Government of India.
(x) One representative each of two reputed NGOs/Voluntary Agencies to be
nominated by the Ministry of Rural Development.
(xi) One representative (Area Officer for the respective State/UT) of Ministry of Rural
Development.
Note: The State authorities should take action immediately on nominating other members and
constituting the committee with the above composition. They need not wait for nomination as
for (viii), (ix) & (x) i.e., nominating members of NGO, KVIC and non-official members for which
the Ministry has initiated action.
For any further detail, the revised guidelines of VMC may be referred which is already
uploaded in the Ministry’s website.
PRC AGENDA
Page 75

The State / District authority to convene the meeting as per the guidelines.

The agenda/minutes, ATR of all VMC meetings must be uploaded on the website. The
website has been modified and demonstrated in the PRC meeting held in June 2014.
3. Guideline/Policy Matters: Guidelines for Vigilance & Monitoring Committees at State and
District Level have been finalized and uploaded on the website of the Ministry of Rural
Development. The major changes made in the Guidelines for Vigilance & Monitoring
Committees at State and District Level are as under:
3.1 Member of the Committee for State/UT level VMC:
a. One Member of Parliament (Lok Sabha) of every political party represented in the Lok
Sabha from the State, and one independent MP (LS), if any
b. MPs (Rajya Sabha) elected from the State ) The number of MPs (RS) in State Level VMCs
should be limited to half of the number of MPs (LS) in the Committee
c. The minimum number of MPs in the Committee should be 4 MPs (LS) and 1 MP
(RS), subject to availability. The Ministry of Rural Development, should nominate
the MPs (both LS and RS) to the Committee.
3.2 Representation of MLAs in State V & MC & other members
a. Five MLAs to be nominated by the State Government out of which two
should be from opposition parties
b. Managing Director of the Convener Bank of State Level Bankers Committee
(SLBC) to be included as a special invitee
c.
All other members as per previous guidelines
3.3 Fixed time schedule for each level (State & District) V & MC:
a. State level VMC: Member Secretary of the State level VMC should convene the
meeting in consultation with the Chairperson. In case the Chairperson of VMC
is pre-occupied and has not indicated any date for convening meeting, the
Member Secretary, in consultation with Co-Chairperson, may ensure that the
meeting is convened within 15 days of end of each quarter, under intimation to
Chairperson/Co-Chairperson and all other members of the Committee.
b. District Level VMC: To be held on fixed dates as under:
Last Saturday of May
First Saturday of August
First Saturday of November
First Saturday of February
If for any reason, the meeting is not held on the given date, the meeting should be
held within a month, as an adjourned meeting, on a date to be decided by the Member
Secretary.
PRC AGENDA
Page 76
3.4 Expenditure for State & District VMC meetings:
a. The total expenditure for holding the State & District level meeting should not
exceed ` 2,00,000/- & ` 1,00,000/- respectively
b. Daily allowance may be allowed to non official members at the State
Government DA rate applicable for Group A Officers of the State
National Level Monitoring Scheme
Guideline/Policy Matters:
The Ministry has a very comprehensive monitoring and Evaluation system for its various
programmes through Monthly Progress Reports, Management Information System, Performance
Review Committee, Vigilance and Monitoring Committees, etc. However, the Ministry fully
recognizes the importance of independent monitoring also. Keeping this in view, a
comprehensive system of National Level Monitors (NLM) was introduced in the year 2003-04 to
achieve the purpose of unbiased and objective monitoring of its schemes in a systematic and
regular manner.
The NLMs are generally deputed by the Ministry for following three types of monitoring
assignments: i) Regular monitoring : The NLMs are deputed to visit districts periodically, generally
twice a year, to monitor and report on various aspects of implementation of
major RD Programmes.
ii) Special Monitoring of individual programmes : NLMs are deputed to cover a
particular programme or some specific aspects of it and make a report on the
issues / processes in detail.
iii) Complaint / Enquiries: In case of complaints of serious nature from people’s
representatives, NGOs, etc. regarding misutilization of funds, irregularities etc., NLMs
are deputed to verify the facts or for a preliminary enquiry.
The NLMs are required to visit the districts, ascertain the implementation of the
programmes vis-à-vis the guidelines, interact with officials, verify the assets created and
interview villagers and submit their reports within a time frame of around two months.
In order to implement the scheme effectively, the role of the State / district officials are
clearly indicated in the revised guidelines. The same are also summarized below:
1. Role of District Collectors/CEO ZPs
1.1
An Entry Meeting with the District Collector/ CEO ZP and other district level officials
will be made by the NLM. Similarly, at the completion of the visit there will be an
Exit Meeting to discuss with the district officials on the provisional findings. The
PRC AGENDA
Page 77
District Collectors/CEO ZPs should ensure cooperation with the NLMs and arrange for
facilitating a smooth and timely completion of their visits to the district.
1.2
All the information required by the NLMs for the purpose of their monitoring should
be collated, duly cross checked and provided to them so as to ensure timeliness,
correctness and reliability of the reports
2. Role of State Government
2.1
The State Government Officials should ensure that the District Collector / Chief
Executive Officer concerned devote time to interact with the NLMs at the beginning as
well as at the end of the visit.
2.2
Since there are different implementation agencies in the States for the RD
programmes the Action Taken Report on the NLM report should be coordinated by a
senior officer in the state not below the rank of Joint Secretary.
2.3
The Reports of the NLM will be forwarded to the State Government so that they can
look into the issues highlighted in the report and identify the actions to be taken. They
should also take corrective actions, wherever required.
2.4
The reports of the NLM will also be discussed in a follow-up workshop where they can
interact with the Ministry officials on the identified issues and action taken.
2.5
The findings and ATRs would be discussed with the State Governments in the PRC
meetings.
********
PRC AGENDA
Page 78
National Social Assistance Programme (NSAP)
1. Feedback on previous Performance Review Committee (PRC) meeting minutes held on 05th and
06th June 2014 is at Annexure -I
2. Core issues causing problems in implementation of the schemes including financial issues,
State specific.
With effect from 01.04.2014, schemes under National Social Assistance Programme have been
converted in Centrally Sponsored Schemes (CSS). Ministry will release funds scheme-wise, and
UC’s will have to be submitted scheme-wise for further releases. States have already been
communicated the estimated number of beneficiaries to be covered under the different
schemes of NSAP. Under CSS, funds will be released to the Consolidated Funds of the States
through Central Plan Scheme Monitoring System (CPSMS).
(i)
Monthly disbursement of Pensions by State Governments to beneficiaries:
As per NSAP guidelines, as far as possible monthly disbursement should be
ensured, if not done already it has to be achieved in the shortest possible time.
Complaints/Grievances are being received in this Division with regard to nondisbursement of pension by the pensioners under pension schemes of NSAP.
In order to enhance efficiency and transparency and accountability in the
implementation, DBT had been rolled out w.e.f 01.07.2013, in the selected 121
districts of 26 States on pilot basis for the three pension schemes under NSAP. It
has now also been decided to extend DBT in all the districts where Aadhaar
enrolment is 50% and above, number of districts now is 252 (additional 131
districts).
(ii)
Submission of Utilization Certificates (UC):
Ministry has released first quarter installment to 26 States/UT’s. The States/UT’s of
Goa, Punjab, Arunachal Pradesh, A& N Islands, Chandigarh, Dadra & Nagar Haveli,
Daman & Diu &Lakshadweep have not submitted UC’s for 2012-13, as well 201314. The UC’s may be submitted for release of funds. Details of Scheme-wise release
as on 31.08.2014 are at Annexure-II.
PRC AGENDA
Page 79
(iii)
Submission of Monthly Progress Reports: The State Governments are required to
upload/furnish monthly progress report (MPR) for utilization of NSAP funds and
beneficiaries covered, scheme-wise. The State/UT Governments of Andhra Pradesh,
Bihar, Chattisgarh, Goa, J&K, Jharkhand, Kerala, Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra,
Odisha, Punjab, Uttar Pradesh, West Bengal, Arunachal Pradesh, Manipur, Sikkim,
Tripura, A &N Islnads, Chandigarh, Dadra & Nagar Haveli, Daman &Diu,
Lakshadweep and Puducherry have not uploaded MPRs since April 2014. Details
are at Annexure III.
Status of the Physical & Financial Progress made by the States/UT’s under the
schemes of NSAP during the year 2013-14 is at Annexure-IV.
(iv)
Allocation of funds 2014-15-State-wise(Scheme-wise) allocation:
Financial allocations for the year 2014-15 have been made based on the number of
beneficiaries reported by the State Government and the estimated figures
conveyed by the Central Government, whichever is less, for the year 2013-14 under
different schemes of NSAP. Details of scheme-wise allocation are at Annexure-V.
(v)
Reporting of Administrative Expenses: States are required to intimate the
expenditure incurred towards administrative expenses yearly. Information has only
received from the State of Andhra Pradesh, Assam, Karnataka, Nagaland &
Tripura.
(vi)
Social Audit and Annual Verification: States/UTs have to furnish Social Audit and
Annual Verification reports regularly, but information is still awaited from
States/UTs.
3.
Guidelines/Policy Matters:
The schemes under National Social Assistance Programme (NSAP) have been converted
into Centrally Sponsored Schemes from the financial year 2014-15.
Accordingly for the
implementation of schemes under NSAP , draft guidelines have been circulated among all the
States / UTs for their comments /views. These Draft Guidelines have also been uploaded on NSAP
website. So far comments/ views from Assam, NCT of Delhi, Sikkim, Karnataka and Gujarat have
been received. Remaining States /UTs are requested to furnish their comments /views, so that
the guidelines may be finalized.
PRC AGENDA
Page 80
4 & 5. MIS system and Information Technology related State Specific Issues:
Specific discussions on the points related to the implementation of the NSAP schemes with
individual States are as Annexure VI.
6
Best Practice/ Innovations/ Case Studies:
Innovation:
Ministry of Labour & Employment decided to converge Rashtriya Swasthya Bima Yojana (RSBY)
with other schemes. Indira Gandhi National Old age Pension Scheme (IGNOAPS) has been
identified as one of the schemes for this convergence exercise. States were requested to
nominate, State Nodal Officers and District Nodal Officers in charge of NSAP schemes. Details of
Pilot Districts in different States and status of nomination is at Annexure-VII. States are requested
to submit information regarding nodal officers.
7. Pending Grievances/ Parliamentary:
Grievances received directly in the Division and through CPGRAMS are promptly attended and as
the State Governments are the implementing agencies, the grievances are forwarded to the
concerned States Government for appropriate action. Details of the grievances forwarded to the
State/UT Governments from where the action taken report is awaited is at Annexure VIII.
At present, there is no parliament matter/assurance wherein information from the States/UT
Governments are required, is pending in the Division.
8.
Simplification of Processes and Forms.
PRC AGENDA
Page 81
Annexure-I
Action Taken Report on the issues raised during the PRC Meeting held on 05 thand 06thJune, 2014.
S.No.
1.
Issues
Action Taken by the States
Action pending with the States
(Names )
(Names)
Comments on the revised Guidelines of NSAP:
NSAP has been converted into Centrally So far comments/ views from Assam, NCT of Comments, yet to be received from remaining
Sponsored Scheme (CSS) from the current Delhi, Sikkim, Karnataka, Punjab and States/UTs.
financial year i.e. 2014-15. Accordingly, revised Gujarat have been received.
Guidelines of NSAP Scheme has been circulated
for comments/ suggestions.
 States/UTs to submit their comments
by 20th June 2014.
2.
Release of funds to States/UTs for the 1st
quarter of 2014-15
For the current year funds under NSAP will be
Funds for First Quarter released to all
released quarterly by MoRD to Consolidated
Goa, Punjab, Arunachal Pradesh, Andman &
States/UTs except Goa, Punjab, Arunachal
Fund of State.
Pradesh,
Andman&Nicobar
Islands, Nicobar Islands, Chandigarh, Dadra & Nagar
 Funds for the first quarter of the year Chandigarh, Dadra & Nagar Haveli, Daman Haveli, Daman & Diu, NCT Delhi due to non2014-15 to be released to the & Diu, NCT Delhi and Lakshadweep
submission Utilization Certificates for the year
States/UTs by 15th June 2014.
PRC AGENDA
Page 82
2012-13, progress report upto December 2013 and
the information of the 50% and more expenditure.
3.
4.
Reporting
of
beneficiaries
under
IGNOAPS,IGNWPS, IGNDPS and families to be
granted assistance under NFBS.
 State/UT’s to submit the report at the
earliest on the scheme-wise actual
number of beneficiaries and the
number covered under schemes of
NSAP.
Social Audit and Annual Verification:
No report is being received from the State/UTs
regarding Social Audit and Annual Verification.
Information is still awaited
Information is still awaited from all States/UTs
States/UT’s to conduct the Social Audit at
regular intervals alongwith the other Schemes
of the Ministry and send the report of the
State to Ministry of Rural Development.
5.
Administrative expenses:
3% Administrative Expenditure are provided In formation for the year 2013-14 have Remaining States yet to report.
under NSAP. However, reports regarding been received from Andhra Pradesh,
utilisation of Administrative expenditure were Assam, Karnataka, and Nagaland& Tripura.
not sent by States.
PRC AGENDA
Page 83
 States to provide details
Administrative Expenditure.
6.
of
3%
Digitization and DBT
 State/UT’s to ensure the Digitization of
data of beneficiaries with complete
details including mode of payment,
seeding of database with bank account
and linkage to Bank A/Cs which are
prerequisite for DBT under NSAP.
Particulars
No. of States & UT's
26
No. of Districts
Total Universe
121
5630575
Total Digitised
5152632
No of beneficiaries with
bank A/C
2110065
No of beneficiaries with
Postal A/C
1669384
No of beneficiaries with
Money Order
No of beneficiaries with
Cash
No of beneficiaries with no
Disbursement information
PRC AGENDA
Value
AP – Hyderbad
MH- Ratnagiri
They have not updated beneficiary data in MIS
139500
160930
1072753
Page 84
 The Aadhar enrolment of pensioners is
slow and Aadhar enrolment of NSAP
beneficiaries to be ensured on
proactive basis.
No of beneficiaries having
AADHAR
Aadhar Linked with Bank
A/c
Aadhar Linked with Postal
A/c
1376479
609021
523963
Karnataka State has tested the Web Service
Developed NSAP-MIS Team. Guideline and
Operational Steps has been given to state
to follow. Offline data uploading facility
provided to state to upload data in NSAPPRC AGENDA
Page 85
 States/UT’s having their own software,
interface or bridge software to be
developed to ensure portability of data
from state pension software to NSAPMIS.
MIS
NSAP-MIS is in process for Security Audit
phase for Security Audit Clearance.
States are tuning the web service with state
own software to push data from state to
NSAP-MIS.
Presently, there is no proposal for shift from
the preferred mode of disbursement of
pension in the States. However, disbursement
of pension through Bank/Post Office accounts
preferably bank accounts may be encouraged
to position for situation where pension will be
paid through BC model at the doorstep of the
beneficiaries using micro ATM.
PRC AGENDA
Page 86
7.
Training in CPSMS:
Many States have reported difficulties in Information received only from State of Information/request is still awaited from other
disbursement of pension through CPSMS and Assam
States/UTs except Assam.
returned transactions details were not
traceable.
 States/UT’s were requested to inform
about their issues and Ministry may
coordinate with o/o CGA to sort out the
problems.
 States/UT’s were requested to inform
the requirement of training, if any, on
CPSMS, the same could be arranged in
consultation with O/o CGA.
8.
Training in MIS:
States/UT’s were requested to inform about Following States have their own software,
their training requirement for NSAP-MIS, so hence no requirement of training:that the same could be organized in the
Andhra Pradesh, Himachal Pradesh,
respective States/UTs by Government of India.
Haryana, Karnataka, Kerala, Madhya
Pradesh, Rajasthan, Tamilnadu, Uttar
Pradesh, Uttarakhand, West Bengal,
Puducherry and NCT Delhi
PRC AGENDA
Page 87
Training to be given on NSAP-MIS to following
States/UTs:J&K, Arunachal Pradesh, Assam, Chhattisgarh,
Chandigarh, Dadra & Nagar Haveli, Dam & Diu,
Goa,
Maharashtra,
Manipur,
Meghalaya,
Mizoram, Nagaland, Odisha, Punjab, Sikkim.
9.
Other Issues
States to nominate State and District Nodal Information from Odisha, West Bengal, Information from Bihar, Chhattisgarh, Jharkhand,
officer for IGNOAPS andRSBY Convergence and Uttar Pradesh, Himachal Pradesh, Gujarat, Uttarakhand, Punjab, Meghalaya, and Mizoram is
inform this Ministry.
Kerala, Assam, Haryana, Karnataka, Tripura, yet to be received.
Nagaland& Madhya Pradesh has been
received.
PRC AGENDA
Page 88
PRC AGENDA
Page 89
PRC AGENDA
Page 90
PRC AGENDA
Page 91
Annexure-V
State-wise Allocation of Beneficiaries under NSAP and Funds for the year 2014-15
IGNOAPS
S. No.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
States
Andhra Pradesh
Bihar
Chhattisgarh
Goa
Gujarat
Haryana
Himachal Pradesh
J&K
Jharkhand
Karnataka
Kerala
Madhya Pradesh
Maharashtra
Odisha
Punjab
Rajasthan
Tamilnadu
Uttar Pradesh
Uttarakhand
West Bengal
Arunachal P
Assam
Manipur
Meghalaya
Mizoram
Nagaland
Sikkim
Tripura
NCT Delhi
Total
PRC AGENDA
Total Beneficiaries
Total fund
( Rs. in Lacs)
1470621 38665.94
3406002 92573.78
571604 16350.89
1609
96.54
145214
6406.75
121909
4075.84
82775
2307.47
154619
3945.04
469396 14135.14
895818 26451.22
67660
3787.37
1178659 35294.64
621999 24863.54
1462960 40716.56
135473
4256.69
460338 15415.70
671268 21369.35
3233191 96449.86
150115
4756.56
1886739 54862.99
31209
792.83
494207 13408.32
69480
1803.13
49600
1289.11
25469
640.96
54898
1431.35
20211
511.45
163151
4190.38
119403
3308.98
18215597 534158.36
IGNWPS
Total Beneficiaries
421137
634695
260625
8160
218395
57149
17979
8334
272108
558653
209236
701325
924483
528570
42187
278712
780236
991784
95313
829105
3565
137463
8043
8498
2310
4464
1614
19879
36361
8060392
IGNDPS
Total fund
( Rs. in Lacs)
15160.93
22849.02
9382.50
293.76
7862.22
2057.36
647.24
300.02
9795.89
20111.51
7532.50
25247.70
33281.39
19028.52
1518.73
10033.63
28088.50
35704.22
3431.27
29847.78
128.34
4948.67
289.55
305.93
83.16
160.70
58.10
715.64
1309.00
290183.79
Total Beneficiaries
64595
126156
38000
606
33537
16804
3125
3347
31286
43639
29935
154937
114000
110822
6473
56854
86400
182823
14386
86750
1802
18916
1341
1470
742
1152
980
3209
6321
1240419
NFBS
Total fund
Rs. in Lacs)
( Total
Beneficiaries
2325.42
4541.62
1368.00
21.82
1207.33
604.94
112.50
120.49
1126.30
1571.00
1077.66
5577.73
4104.00
3989.59
233.03
2046.74
3110.40
6581.63
517.90
3123.00
64.87
680.98
48.28
52.92
26.71
41.47
35.28
115.52
227.56
44666.69
Page 92
18700
35859
15000
225
10695
4154
684
522
14148
18312
4358
30826
34987
24697
2673
12347
18445
73075
4808
21553
415
8524
669
781
236
642
200
1181
2270
360999
Annapurna
Total fund
Rs. in Lacs)
( Total
Beneficiaries
3740.00
7171.80
3000.00
45.00
2139.00
830.80
136.80
104.40
2829.60
3662.40
871.60
6165.20
6997.40
4939.40
534.60
2469.40
3689.00
14615.00
961.60
4310.60
83.00
1704.80
133.80
156.20
47.20
128.40
40.00
236.20
454.00
72211.20
93200
166600
24196
420
Total fund
( Rs. in Lacs)
25308
3320
3580
1000
2600
960
5740
782.88
1399.44
203.25
3.53
0.00
0.00
22.21
0.00
461.49
0.00
309.99
0.00
907.20
544.32
0.00
399.00
557.66
0.00
0.00
546.57
0.00
212.59
27.89
30.07
8.40
21.84
8.06
48.22
773182
6510.60
2644
54939
36904
108000
64800
47500
66388
65068
Annual requirement
incl admn charges
( Rs. in Lacs)
62495.43
132391.73
31213.77
474.46
18143.76
7796.01
3323.01
4604.05
29198.86
53350.01
13986.49
74453.83
72258.14
71294.95
6739.34
31275.41
58519.35
157951.23
9957.34
95471.67
1101.11
21584.01
2371.72
1889.26
830.62
1837.28
672.49
5465.14
5458.51
976127.00
ANNEXURE – VI
STATE SPECIFIC ISSUES ON NSAP-MIS
S.N.
Name of the
State
Issues
01
Andhra
Pradesh
State having own Software. Pensioners data need to be updated in NSAP-MIS
through Web Interface by State
02
Bihar
03
Chhattisgarh
Cash disbursement model through BDOs/GPs in rural area therefore pension
scroll may be generated using NSAP-MIS.
State to generate pension scrolls using NSAP-MIS and push pension electronically
to CPSMS for ABP/NEFT
04
Goa
State to generate pension scrolls using NSAP-MIS and push pension electronically
to CPSMS for ABP/NEFT
05
Gujarat
State to generate pension scrolls using NSAP-MIS and push pension electronically
to CPSMS for ABP/NEFT
06
Haryana
07
Himachal
Pradesh
Cash disbursement model through BDOs/GPs in rural area therefore pension
scroll may be generated using NSAP-MIS.
State having own Software. Pensioners data need to be updated in NSAP-MIS
through Web Interface by State
08
Jammu &
Kashmir
State to complete beneficiary data
09
Jharkhand
State to generate pension scrolls using NSAP-MIS and push pension electronically
to CPSMS for ABP/NEFT
10
Karnataka
State having own Software. Pensioners data need to be updated in NSAP-MIS
through Web Interface by State
11
Kerala
State having own Software. Pensioners data need to be updated in NSAP-MIS
through Web Interface by State
12
Madhya
Pradesh
State having own Software. Pensioners data need to be updated in NSAP-MIS
through Web Interface by State
13
Maharashtra
Data Completed in DBT districts
State to generate pension scrolls using NSAP-MIS and push pension electronically
to CPSMS for ABP/NEFT
14
Odisha
PRC AGENDA
State to complete beneficiary data
Page 93
15
Punjab
State to generate pension scrolls using NSAP-MIS and push pension electronically
to CPSMS for ABP/NEFT
Training on NSAP-MIS to be given to user department
State having own Software. Pensioners data need to be updated in NSAP-MIS
through Web Interface by State
16
Rajasthan
17
Tamil Nadu
State having own Software. Pensioners data need to be updated in NSAP-MIS
through Web Interface by State
Uttar Pradesh
State having own Software. Pensioners data need to be updated in NSAP-MIS
through Web Interface by State
19
Uttarakhand
State having own Software. Pensioners data need to be updated in NSAP-MIS
through Web Interface by State
20
West Bengal
State having own Software. Pensioners data need to be updated in NSAP-MIS
through Web Interface by State
21
Assam
State to complete beneficiary data
22
Arunachal
Pradesh
State to complete beneficiary data
23
Manipur
State to complete beneficiary data
24
Meghalaya
State to complete beneficiary data
25
Mizoram
State to complete beneficiary data
26
Nagaland
State to complete beneficiary data
27
Sikkim
State to complete beneficiary data
28
Tripura
State to generate pension scrolls using NSAP-MIS and push pension electronically
to CPSMS for ABP/NEFT
29.
Delhi
State having own Software. Pensioners data need to be updated in NSAP-MIS
through Web Interface by State
30
A&N Islands
State to complete beneficiary data
18
PRC AGENDA
Page 94
31
Dadra & Nagar
Haveli
Data Up-to-date and completed.
32
Daman & Diu
State to complete beneficiary data
33
Puducherry
State to generate pension scrolls using NSAP-MIS and push pension electronically
to CPSMS for ABP/NEFT
34
Lakshadweep
Completed and transferring pension in bank a/c through CPSMS
35
Chandigarh
Beneficiary data Completed.
State to generate pension scrolls using NSAP-MIS and push pension electronically
to CPSMS for ABP/NEFT
State to generate pension scrolls using NSAP-MIS and push pension electronically
to CPSMS for ABP/NEFT
PRC AGENDA
Page 95
Annexure-VII
Nomination of Nodal Officers for Rashtriya Sawasthya Bina Yojana(RSBY) convergence
with IGNOAPS
At present separate schemes for social security and welfare are implement by different
Ministries. With an objective that unorganised workers have easy access to these social
security schemes through a single platform, convergence among these is proposed by the
Ministry of Labour and Employment in coordination with all related Ministries. The
Ministry of Rural Development is one of the Ministries, and have shared our database for
NSAP as part of this Initiative and Indira Gandhi National Old age Pension Scheme
(IGNOAPS) has been identified as one of the schemes for this convergence exercise.
2.
An Inter-Ministerial Group (IMG) was constituted by Ministry of Labour and
Employment to work out the modalities of convergence. The Inter-Ministerial Group
decided to implement, on a pilot basis , the project in 20 districts of the country. Ministry
of Rural Development has to nominate State Nodal Officers and Districts Nodal Officers to
deal with the data source related to our Ministry and Coordination. Accordingly, vide this
Ministry letter No. L-12060/8/2013-NSAP dated 21/4/2014 , Secretaries /Principal
Secretaries in the States dealing with NSAP to nominate the State Nodal Officer and the
District Nodal Officers in charge of NSAP schemes of the identified district and intimate
the same to this Ministry. The details of Pilot districts for convergence and status of
nomination of State Nodal Officers and the Districts Nodal Officers by the States is as
under:
S.No.
Name of the State
Pilot Districts
Status of Nomination
1.
Assam
Barpeta
Information yet to be received
2.
Bihar
Patna
-Do-
3.
Chattisgarh
Durg
-Do-
4.
Gujarat
Porbandar
-Do-
5.
Haryana
Faridabad
-Do-
6.
Himachal Pradesh
Mandi
-Do-
7.
Jharkhand
Dumka
-Do-
8.
Karnataka
Mysore
-Do-
9.
Kerala
Kollam
-Do-
10.
Madhya Pradesh
Gwalior
-Do-
11.
Manipur
Imphal East
PRC AGENDA
Nominated
Page 96
12.
Meghalaya
East Khasi
13.
Mizoram
Aizwal
-Do-
14.
Nagaland
Kohima
-Do-
15.
Odisha
Bolangir
16.
Punjab
Sangrur
17.
Tripura
West Tripura
18.
Uttar Pradesh
Kanpur Nagar
19.
Uttarkhand
Nainital
-Do-
20.
West Bengal
Bankura
Nominated
PRC AGENDA
Information yet to be received
Nominated
Information yet to be received
Nominated
Information yet to be received
Page 97
Annexure-VIII
Details of grievance forwarded to the concerned State Governments for further necessary
action.
S.No.
Name of State
No. of grievances
forwarded
Status
1.
Bihar
10
Replies in all the cases still awaited.
2.
Tamil Nadu
01
-do-
3.
Rajasthan
01
-do-
4.
Uttar Pradesh
11
-do-
5.
Punjab
01
-do-
6.
Jharkhand
04
-do-
7.
Karnataka
01
-do-
8.
Andhra Pradesh
02
-do-
9.
West Bengal
02
-do-
10.
Maharashtra
01
-do-
11.
Madhya Pradesh
02
-do-
12.
Gujarat
02
-do-
13.
Odisha
01
-do-
PRC AGENDA
Page 98
Providing Urban Amenities to Rural Areas {PURA}/
RURBAN Mission
Detailed Suggestions may be given by the States
1) Norms for identifying the rural clusters-size, location, etc.
2) Planning process – expertise required, process to be followed.
3) Components of SPMRM and Schemes to be mandatorily converged.
4) Role of different stakeholders

GOI – MoRD

State Government

PRIs

Private Sector

Cooperatives

Financial Institutions

NGOs

Academic Institutions
5) Responsibilities and Mechanisms for:

Planning including DPR

Converging of different Central / State Schemes

Approvals

Implementation of different components

Monitoring and Evaluation

Post-investment sustainability
6) Fund requirements and fund flow arrangements
7) Other relevant issues
PRC AGENDA
Page 99
Skill Development
1.
Feed back on previous meeting Minutes:
Sl.
No.
Issue
Action Taken by
States (name)
1.
(a) So far only 6 States have
transited to Annual Action Plan
(Andhra Pradesh, Bihar, Gujarat,
Odisha, Rajasthan and Tamil
Nadu) under Aajeevika Skills.
The remaining Year Programme
States had been requested to
transit to Annual Action Plan
immediately.
States of UP & Kerala
have transited from
Year Plan (YP) State
to AAP State in the
year 2014-15. The
State Government of
Jharkhand has
submitted proposal
for AAP. However,
the State
Government of
Jharkhand has been
advised to revise the
proposal in terms of
Aajeevika Skills
Guidelines, 2013.
Status pending from
States of Arunachal
Pradesh,
Assam,
Chhattisgarh,
Goa,
Haryana,
Himachal
Pradesh, Jharkhand,
Karnataka, Madhya
Pradesh,
Maharashtra,
Manipur, Meghalaya,
Mizoram, Nagaland,
Punjab,
Sikkim,
Tripura, Uttarakhand
& West Bengal.
(b) Year Programme State
Governments to put in place
monitoring
mechanism,
especially for selection of
beneficiaries and for regular
monitoring of Training Centres.
Government of HP
has stated that it
would put such
system in place after
Aajeevika Skills
projects commence
in the State.
Status pending from
States of Arunachal
Pradesh, Assam,
Chhattisgarh, Goa,
Haryana, Jharkhand,
Karnataka, Madhya
Pradesh,
Maharashtra,
Manipur, Meghalaya,
Mizoram, Nagaland,
Punjab, Sikkim,
Tripura, Uttarakhand
Government of UP
has informed that it
has developed its
monitoring
mechanism.
PRC AGENDA
Action pending with
the States (name)
Page 100
Sl.
No.
Issue
Action Taken by
States (name)
Action pending with
the States (name)
& West Bengal.
(c) SRLMs to develop State skills State Government of
IT platform in order to integrate UP has informed that
with MoRD’s ASDMS.
it will develop MIS
system as per the
needs of Aajeevika
Skills.
Status pending from
other States..
2.
The State Governments were
requested to ensure that in 27
Roshni Districts, non-Roshni skill
development projects under
Aajeevika Skills should not be
undertaken.
Recommendation
from SRLM, WB is still
awaited for one
project sanctioned by
the EC for change of
district in approved
project.
3.
The State Governments were All states suitably
requested to post PMRD the advised
Fellows in Intensive Districts,
especially in North-East States.
A total of 26 projects
sanctioned by MoRD
required change in
districts. Out of these
in 15 projects
necessary orders
have been issued to
replace Roshni
districts with nonRoshni districts.
Action is underway in
remaining projects.
No action pending
2.
Core issues causing problems in implementation of the schemes including
financial issues, State specific:
(i)
Standard Operating Procedures for Aajeevika Skills projects:-
Aajeevika Skills evolved out of learning’s from the Special Project component of the
Swarnjayanti Gram Swarojgar Yojana (later renamed as National Rural Livelihoods
Mission in 2011), and the necessity to upscale and increase the reach of the skilling
program to cover a larger number of unemployed rural youth. Aajeevika Skills follows a
three-tier level of concurrent monitoring. In order to avoid diverse processes and
discretion in monitoring, which not only dissuades quality Project Implementing Agencies
to participate in the program but also leads to delays in project implementation due to
lack of clarity in processes, the Ministry has developed Standard Operating Procedures
PRC AGENDA
Page 101
(SOP) laying down protocols and service standards for implementation of the Aajeevika
Skills projects. The SOP lays down protocols and service standards for sanction of a
skilling project; fund releases; orderly closure of a project; recovery of dues; Mobilization
and Screening of Candidates; Training Centre and Training Plan management to ensure
quality; Look & Feel of Training Centre; Protocols for inspection -onsite as well as offsite
(through CCTV); Uniform standards; and assessment and certification of trained
candidates. The SOP also prescribes remedies for delays. All the State Governments are
requested to ensure compliance with SOP in monitoring implementation of Aajeevika
Skills/Roshni projects.
(ii)
Release of State Government’s matching shares in Aajeevika Skills projects
As per the Aajeevika Skills Guidelines, 2013 the projects are funded by Central and State
Government in the ratio of 75:25 (in case of NE States the ratio is 90:10). It is mandatory
for states to contribute their share for a project to commence. However, it has been
found that Aajeevika Skills projects sanctioned by MORD have not been able to
commence operations due to delays in release of State share of the funds. The Standard
Operating Procedures (SOP) prescribed that State Government shall release its share of
project funds to CTSA within 10 working days after signing of MoU. This has not been
happening, therefore, State Governments are requested to take necessary action for
release of State Government shares as per the time limit prescribed in the SOP.
3.
Guidelines/Policy Matters: NIL
4.
MIS System- State specific issues:
Use of Aajeevika Skills Development and Monitoring System (ASDMS)
The MoRD has deployed version 1 of Aajeevika Skill Development and Monitoring System
(ASDMS) in the month of July 2014 for enabling workflow based online systems for
Aajeevika Skills projects, which includes the following:
i.
ii.
iii.
iv.
v.
Prospective Work Schedule (for capturing monthly projections of training &
placement)
Project Executive Readiness module with approval by CTSA
Training Centre Due Diligence with verification by ‘Q’ team and approval by CTSA
Batch creation module
Candidate Management (Enrolment)
In order to rollout version 2 of the ASDMS and allow for integration of MIS on projects in
AAP States with ASDMS, MoRD has sought information on Aajeevika Skills projects from
Stats of Andhra Pradesh, Bihar, Gujarat, Rajasthan, Odisha, and Tamil Nadu vide MoRD
letter dated 19th August 2014. This information is awaited. States are requested to furnish
the same immediately.
5.
Information Technology related State specific matters:-
Public Fund Management System:
The Central Government has been operating Public Fund Management System (PFMS),
which is a web-based online transaction system for fund management and e-payment to
PRC AGENDA
Page 102
implementing agencies and beneficiaries. The primary objective of PFMS is to establish an
efficient fund flow system and expenditure network. PFMS also provides various
stakeholders with a reliable and meaningful management information system and an
effective decision support system. PFMS provides for an active interface with 90 banks
(26 Public Sector Banks, 59 Regional Rural Banks and 5 major Private Sector Banks) to
provide immediate validation of bank accounts, prompt electronic credit to the
beneficiary’s bank account and bank reconciled expenditure statements to the
implementing agencies. As part of the process to increase efficiency in fund transfers, all
State Governments are requested to register the designated State Nodal Agency for
Aajeevika Skills and the Project Implementing Agencies on the PFMS and use the PFMS
for fund dispersal.
6.
Best Practice/Innovations /Case Studies: NIL
7.
Pending Grievances/Parliamentary Matters: NIL
PRC AGENDA
Page 103