CONCEPTS & STRATEGIES CONCERNING INTERCULTURAL COMPETENCES
CONCEPTS & STRATEGIES
concerning
INTERCULTURAL COMPETENCES
This project has been funded with support from the European Commission. This presentation reflects the views only of the author, and
1 the
Commission cannot be held responsible for any use which may be made of the information contained therein. LLP Leonardo da Vinci Transfer
of Innovation Programme / Grant agreement number: DE/13/LLP-LdV/TOI/147636
CONCEPTS & STRATEGIES CONCERNING INTERCULTURAL COMPETENCES
Consortium
bfw Unternehmen für Bildung – RESO/ProG (coordinator)
Hauptstraße 25, 69117
Heidelberg, Germany
http://www.bfw.EU.com
Clemens Körte [email protected]
Learning Factory Beratung & Training Angela Fuhr-Schöchle
Verlängerte Triebstraße 20
Heddesheim, Germany
www.learning-factory.org
Angela Fuhr-Schöchle [email protected]
Höhere Technische Bundeslehranstalt Wolfsberg (HTL Wolfsberg)
Gartenstrasse 1,
Wolfsberg, Austria
www.htl-wolfsberg.at
Jürgen Jantschgi [email protected]
Johann Persoglia johann.persoglia@@htl-wolfsberg.at
Instituto de Formación y Estudios Sociales
Calle Martín el Humano, 1-Entresuelo
Valencia, Spain
www.ifes.es
Fernando Benavente [email protected]
Sociedade Portuguesa de Inovação - Consultadoria Empresarial e Fomento da Inovação, S.A.
Avenida Marechal Gomes da Costa 1376
Porto, Portugal
www.spieurope.eu
Augusto Medina [email protected]
Campus Varberg
Campus Varberg, 432 80
Varberg, Sweden
www.campus.varberg.se
Martin Andersson [email protected]
Sihtasutus Junior Achievement Eesti
Lauteri 3-212
Tallinn, Estonia
www.ja.ee
Epp Vodja [email protected]
AKLUB Centrum vzdelavani a poradenstvi
aRicni okruh 26
Krnov, Czech Republic
www.aklub.org
Ludek Richter [email protected]
Vladimir Plesnik [email protected]
2
CONCEPTS & STRATEGIES CONCERNING INTERCULTURAL COMPETENCES
Contents
Contents ............................................................................................................................................3
Introduction ......................................................................................................................................5
1. Intercultural competence ..............................................................................................................9
2. Conceptual Framework................................................................................................................ 13
2.1 Conflict .............................................................................................................................................. 14
2.1.1 Conflict types ............................................................................................................................. 14
2.1.2 Intercultural Interpersonal Conflict ........................................................................................... 15
2.2 Conflict Management in Intercultural Settings................................................................................. 16
2.2.1 Modes of Conflict Resolution .................................................................................................... 17
2.2.2. Communication styles across cultures...................................................................................... 20
2.3 Organizational Culture ...................................................................................................................... 23
2.4 Leadership styles ............................................................................................................................... 27
2.5 Intercultural Sensitivity – Developing an Ethno-Relativistic Worldview .......................................... 32
3. Strategies of Intervention – The Moderator’s Role in Intercultural Conflict Resolution ................... 35
3.1 The Six Steps to Conflict Resolution.................................................................................................. 35
3.1.1 Introducing ................................................................................................................................. 36
3.1.2 Collecting.................................................................................................................................... 38
3.1.3 Selecting ..................................................................................................................................... 44
3.1.4 Processing .................................................................................................................................. 46
3.1.5 Planning...................................................................................................................................... 47
3.1.6 Concluding.................................................................................................................................. 49
3.2 Critical Situations and Possible Solutions ......................................................................................... 50
4. Conclusion ................................................................................................................................... 56
Sources ............................................................................................................................................ 58
3
CONCEPTS & STRATEGIES CONCERNING INTERCULTURAL COMPETENCES
Introduction
4
CONCEPTS & STRATEGIES CONCERNING INTERCULTURAL COMPETENCES
Introduction
The following document is framed within the project COSIMA-Competence Building in Simulation
Processes for Apprentices and Adolescent Employees. COSIMA is a Lifelong Learning Program project
that aims at adapting an instrument for simulating business processes initially developed in Germany –
the FIS (Factory In the Seminar room) of the “Learning Factory” – to the situation of young people in
career orientation, apprenticeships and adolescent employees (<25 years), and at transferring it to all
participating partner countries.
According to the foreseen project activities, the partners have developed modules and training
materials. In this case, the contents of the methods compiled are related to intercultural competences.
Living and working in a complex globalized world, people, societies, companies and organizations are
faced with a growing number of challenges. The increasingly diverse population of Europe has been a
result of changes in global communication and increased mobility. People have migrated to and from
Europe as well as within European countries for a wide range of often complex and overlapping reasons
and frequently under difficult circumstances.
The resulting great diversity has produced a change in the way that things are done, to engage with and
respond appropriately to the needs and aspirations of people from different countries and diverse
cultures and to accommodate broader demographic change. Europe’s social and cultural challenges
include creating jobs, absorbing immigrants, improving education, exploiting cultural diversity, and
addressing inequalities within the EU.
Responses to increased diversity have ranged from positive to negative. By some, diversity has been
embraced as an opportunity for creativity and innovation; but it has also been considered a threat. As a
result of fear of that which is different or unknown, some responses have focused on differences
between people rather than similarities, and association of difference with ‘bad’ or ‘risky’, and
similarities with ‘good’ or ‘safe’.
Diversity management has become a topic for work in schools, colleges, companies and organizations.
Effective diversity management includes the need for ‘intercultural competences’, well-developed
intercultural competences in order to work and interact effectively with people from different countries
5
CONCEPTS & STRATEGIES CONCERNING INTERCULTURAL COMPETENCES
or diverse cultures. Intercultural competences are required to meet the need for social, economic, and
cultural integration, and to satisfy legal and professional requirements that have a direct impact on
professional practice, the success of organizations and the overall effectiveness of work. In our context,
intercultural competences are vital for effective lifelong learning.
The contents considered within this project for the development of the module intercultural
competence include issues such as: creating awareness of stereotypes, creating acceptance for other
cultures, overcoming ethnocentrism, understanding attachment to own culture and enculturation and
understanding different cultures.
The objectives of this module are:
•
To supply knowledge and make use of encounters with other cultures, people, nations, codes of
conduct in daily working life, etc.
•
To create curiosity, to spark openness and interest in experiencing diversity
•
To raise awareness of own weaknesses, strengths, needs and emotional stability
•
To acquire skills of communication, behavior, and conflict resolution in situations of intercultural
contact (team work, project work, etc.).
The information given below aims at providing trainers with the necessary background needed for
successful intercultural interactions. Each section will make references to the fields of nationality and
ethnicity, socio-cultural differences, and hierarchical structures.
First, the term ‘intercultural competence’ will be defined and further elaborated. Readers will gain an
understanding of the specific communicative skills needed by people interacting in intercultural settings
and with people from diverse backgrounds.
The conceptual framework will be provided in section 2 of the module. It will deal with the different
types of conflicts that can arise in intercultural group activities and a special focus will be laid on the
intercultural interpersonal conflicts. Additionally, the section will give a clear understanding of conflict
management and the different modes of conflict resolution (the five-style model). In reference to
nationality, ethnicity, hierarchy and social interaction, it will give an overview of communication styles
across cultures (high-and low-context cultures). Furthermore, the conceptual framework will provide
insights into differences in organizational cultures, into different leadership styles, and the development
6
CONCEPTS & STRATEGIES CONCERNING INTERCULTURAL COMPETENCES
of intercultural sensitivity. Though cultural differences at the levels of values are more deeply rooted in
the minds and behavior of people – and especially religious issues are currently discussed controversially
– the module focuses on the more tangible aspects of cultural differences – like conflict,
communication, working together in an organization/ enterprise, leadership styles – because these
differences come to the fore in concrete daily practices.
Section 3 of the module will then move on from the conceptual framework to a more practical approach
which will, however, frequently refer back the different concepts, communication styles, and modes
which were discussed in the earlier sections. It will elaborate on the six steps that can be taken by a
moderator in situations where conflicts arise due to differences in culture and understanding.
Additionally, the section will provide some ideas about methods and strategies that may be helpful
during the different steps of conflict resolution. Last but not least, it will give some typical examples of
complex and critical situations which a moderator may be faced with, and point out some possible
resolution approaches.
Finally, the concluding section will summarize the key points made in the module for the development
of ‘intercultural competence’.
7
CONCEPTS & STRATEGIES CONCERNING INTERCULTURAL COMPETENCES
1. INTERCULTURAL
COMPETENCE
8
CONCEPTS & STRATEGIES CONCERNING INTERCULTURAL COMPETENCES
1. Intercultural competence
In simple terms, intercultural competence is defined as follows:
“Intercultural competence is a set of cognitive, affective and behavioral skills and characteristics that
supports effective and appropriate interaction in a variety of cultural contexts.”1
It is to be understood as a comprehensive concept which combines concepts for the interaction across
global and domestic barriers. People from diverse backgrounds have different, but equally significant
things to contribute to an intercultural encounter due to their own experiences with race, gender,
religion, etc. In order for interactions to run smoothly and to avoid conflict, individuals and organizations
should recognize the different values, beliefs, and codes of conduct which their counterparts contribute,
whether the differences are global or domestic. The concept of intercultural competence is an attempt
to construct a multilayered framework that values all (socio-) cultural influences and focuses on
similarities instead of differences.
The cognitive skills needed for successful intercultural encounters include:
•
cultural self-awareness (knowledge of the intersections of race, gender, religion, etc. within
oneself)
•
culture-general knowledge (non-verbal behavior, communication style, cognitive style, cultural
values and language use (pragmatics), e.g. handshake as welcoming gesture)
•
culture-specific knowledge (deeper and subtler interpretations of cultural patterns within a
specific culture, e.g. the length and firmness of a handshake)
•
interaction analysis (observing members of another culture during their interactions and taking
mental note)
Affective skills require more active involvement than the cognitive processes described above. They
include:
1
Based on: Bennet, Janet. „Developing Intercultural Competence For International Education Faculty & Staff.“ Leaders in International Higher
Education Workshop, Association of International Education Administrators (AIEA), Competence Handout. San Francisco, CA, USA: 20-23 Feb
2011. Pdf.
9
CONCEPTS & STRATEGIES CONCERNING INTERCULTURAL COMPETENCES
•
curiosity (suspending own assumptions and value judgments, practice cultural humility,
enhancing own perception skills, developing multiple perspectives, increasing tolerance of
ambiguity, asking questions as culturally appropriate, becoming analytically inquisitive, assessing
the credibility of our cultural sources)
•
cognitive flexibility (the ability to switch between two or more cultural concepts or to
simultaneously consider both)
•
motivation (the motivation behind certain behavioral patterns, both of one’s own and the
cultural other)
•
open-mindedness (being receptive of the ideas, beliefs, and opinions of others)
Last but not least, the behavioral skills needed in all encounters are:
•
relationship building skills
•
behavioral skills (listening, problem solving, etc.)
•
empathy for one’s counterpart
•
information gathering skills
A person who commands a good number of the skills described above is generally considered
interculturally-competent. However, there are few things which should be addressed: Cultural
knowledge or cultural contact does not necessarily lead to competence. Instead, it may lead to a
reduction of stereotypes. Furthermore, it is often assumed that language learning suffices for culture
learning; that, however, is not always the case.
→ Then how does one develop intercultural competence? It may be achieved through:
•
intentional and developmentally sequenced program design of learning
•
balanced challenge and support, leading to the reduction of anxiety in intercultural encounters
•
facilitating learning before, during, and after intercultural experiences
•
language emersion and extensive intercultural experiences
•
cultivating curiosity and cognitive flexibility
10
CONCEPTS & STRATEGIES CONCERNING INTERCULTURAL COMPETENCES
Cognitive, affective, and behavioral skills are needed in order to have successful intercultural
encounters. In addition, it helps to have some knowledge of cultural, hierarchical, and communicative
concepts.
11
CONCEPTS & STRATEGIES CONCERNING INTERCULTURAL COMPETENCES
2.
CONCEPTUAL
FRAMEWORK
12
CONCEPTS & STRATEGIES CONCERNING INTERCULTURAL COMPETENCES
2. Conceptual Framework
In order to fully grasp the issues related to conflict resolution in an intercultural, multinational setting,
and to provide moderators with the necessary tools for practice, it is indispensable to have a closer look
at the concept of conflict, especially in regard to intercultural interaction and communication. In most
traditional approaches, conflict is seen as a destructive force which literally shuts down progress. The
more recent interactive approach, however, focuses on the potential for improving interactions
between team members/ fellow employees:
CONNOTATIONS OF THE TERM ‘CONFLICT’2
positive
negative
Refers to problems
Leads to stagnation of processes
Avoids stagnation and begins process of change
Fosters resistance
Sparks interest and curiosity
Causes fear, anxiety, frustration, pain, stress,
unhappiness
Helps to bring about solutions
Leads to a bad atmosphere
Leads to self-awareness
Promotes assignment of guilt/ scapegoating
Strengthens group identity
Leaves behind winners and losers
Serves as ‘cleansing’ storm
Fosters discussion
The five-style model of conflict resolution as well as contextual differences across cultures are needed
for a basic understanding of the different approaches people take when confronting each other in a
2
Lippmann, Eric. „Konfliktmanagement als Führungsaufgabe.“ In: Handbuch angewandte Psychologie für
Führungskräfte. 2. Auflage. Steiger/ Lippmann (Hgg.). Springer: Berlin, 2003. p. 340.
13
CONCEPTS & STRATEGIES CONCERNING INTERCULTURAL COMPETENCES
business context and beyond. In this section of the module, these concepts will be defined and further
elaborated where it seems necessary.
2.1 Conflict
2.1.1 Conflict types3
“A social conflict is to be understood as a social relationship in which two or more interdependent parties
emphatically attempt to realize opposing action plans while being completely aware of their opposition
(Watzlawick, 1969).”4
In business settings, such as meetings, conferences, seminars, etc. people will frequently be confronted
with ideas, beliefs, and behavior which do not comply with their own. When the parties involved fail to
work out these differences in opinion, conflict arises. In general, two different types of conflict can be
distinguished: factual conflict and interpersonal conflict. Misunderstandings and controversies are often
falsely categorized as a third conflict type (cf. ‘sham conflict’).
Factual conflicts arise due to differences in professional knowledge, interests, and views. They can be
further distinguished into conflict of goals, conflict of methods, and conflict over control and
distribution. Out of the different types, factual conflicts are the easiest to be resolved, since they
depend on facts, not on emotion. In order to avoid or resolve factual conflicts, it is absolutely necessary
to clarify goals, determine methods to be used, as well as assigning tasks to personnel ahead of time.
Should a factual conflict arise, it can be dissolved by discussing the issues with all parties involved and
negotiating further approaches with which everyone can be satisfied.
Interpersonal conflicts occur in the social coexistence of people and usually arise due to prejudices
(both positive and negative), as well as communication and cooperation problems. They are informed by
emotions and values, both greatly varying between different people. Sympathy, dislike, norms, values,
rules, lack of appreciation, and ethical attitude are the most common factors fostering conflict between
two or more people. In order to avoid interpersonal conflicts, team development needs to aim at the
3
Based on: Mayrshofer, Daniela und Hubertus A. Kröger. Prozeßkompetenz in der Projektarbeit. (Reihe Moderation in der Praxis). Hamburg:
Windmühle Verlag, 1999. pp. 81-90.
4
Translated from: Mayrshofer, Daniela und Hubertus A. Kröger. Prozeßkompetenz in der Projektarbeit. (Reihe Moderation in der Praxis).
Hamburg: Windmühle Verlag, 1999. p. 81.
14
CONCEPTS & STRATEGIES CONCERNING INTERCULTURAL COMPETENCES
harmonic interaction of team members. Should they arise, however, interpersonal conflicts have the
potential to be both destructive as well as constructive. The outcome largely depends on the ways of
conflict resolution that are employed. Social competence plays a significant role in the resolution
process.
As mentioned above, not all issues in communication and interaction can be categorized as conflicts.
Sometimes, they are solely misunderstandings or simple controversies that can easily be resolved
through negotiation. Additionally, when an interpersonal conflict is brought up in a factual discussion, it
cannot be resolved in the given context and needs to be addressed in a different setting. This can take
place, for instance, in a personal conversation or through mediation. In cases of misunderstanding,
controversy, or where a conflict has shifted from the factual to interpersonal level or vice versa, it is
considered a ‘sham conflict’.
2.1.2 Intercultural Interpersonal Conflict
Due to the globalized world we live in, it has become quite common to work with colleagues from all
parts of the world in diverse teams. Foreign team members may be employed by a subsidiary or an
associated company abroad. German companies, for instance, often consist of a multicultural team with
employees from Spanish, Portuguese, Italian, Greek, Turkish, etc. backgrounds. Oftentimes, they are
second generation immigrants who were born in Germany and have lived there all their lives. When
dealing with a multinational or multicultural group of people, the conflicts that can arise need to be
considered through the lens of intercultural diversity in conflict behavior and resolution. These
differences become especially visible on the interpersonal level, i.e. the level of interaction between
people of different cultural origin. These differences are not limited to nationality but go far beyond, as
Catarina Barios’ definition of intercultural interpersonal conflict shows:
“Intercultural conflicts do not only involve several cultural systems, they are conflicts in which culture in
general plays a significant role. Here, culture is not limited to nationality; it also includes regional,
organizational, and professional cultures and subcultures. When a conflict is intercultural, different
norms and values are responsible for the way in which behavior is perceived and interpreted. This opens
15
CONCEPTS & STRATEGIES CONCERNING INTERCULTURAL COMPETENCES
a new level of communication. Meaning has to be negotiated in order for any intercultural encounter to
be successful.”5
According to Barios, business culture is as much a part of intercultural interaction as national culture. A
manager can have fundamentally different views and values than someone employed with the same
company. The hierarchical structures involved will be further discussed in the later part of this module
(section 3.4).
In order to navigate between the multicultural parties involved, the moderator/ process manager/
process consultant needs to be interculturally competent, i.e. s/he has to command (at least) the
following skills:
•
Awareness of his/ her own cultural concepts
•
Willingness and ability to communicate on the meta level
•
Comprehension of the specific concepts of perceiving, thinking, feeling, and acting of people
with cultural heritage different from his/ her own
2.2 Conflict Management in Intercultural Settings
In conflict management, it is the task of the moderator or process manager/ consultant to detect
conflicts, address them in the group, and try to solve them in cooperation with all parties involved. S/he
is responsible for:
•
further developing his/ her own attitude towards conflicts,
•
allowing conflict to happen instead of trying to oppress it,
•
being objective and mediating between conflicting ideas/ interests,
•
being sensitive & perceptive to the (professional) needs of all parties involved,
•
clarifying problems and goals,
•
compensating power relations and influence,
5
Barios, Catarina. „Interkulturelle Mediation in Teams mit multinationaler Belegschaft aus Deutschland und Lateinamerika.“ In: Interkulturelle
Kommunikation: Methoden, Modelle, Beispiele. Kumbier, Dagmar und Friedemann Schulz von Thun (Hg.) Reinbek bei Hamburg: Rowohlt Verlag,
2006. p. 253.
16
CONCEPTS & STRATEGIES CONCERNING INTERCULTURAL COMPETENCES
•
being informed about the different types of conflict management (five-style model),
•
improving team communication,
•
pointing out alternative forms of behavior/ action,
•
distinguishing real from sham conflicts,
•
restoring a shifted conflict to its original level , and
•
enhancing employee satisfaction.6
2.2.1 Modes of Conflict Resolution
Five different modes of conflict resolution have been classified according to degrees of assertiveness
and cooperativeness7: competing, collaborating, compromising, avoiding, and accommodating. Their
connection is shown in the following graph8:
Figure 1. Resolving conflict – The five-style conflict model
6
Cf. Mayrshofer, Daniela und Hubertus A. Kröger. Prozeßkompetenz in der Projektarbeit. (Reihe Moderation in der Praxis). Hamburg:
Windmühle Verlag, 1999. pp. 88-89.
7
Cf. Schneider, Susan S. and Jean-Louis Barsoux. „The ‚multicultural’ team.“ In: Managing Across Cultures, 2nd ed. Financial Times Prentice Hall,
2003. p. 236-238.
8
Taken from: Schneider, Susan S. and Jean-Louis Barsoux. „The ‚multicultural’ team.“ In: Managing Across Cultures, 2nd ed. Financial Times
Prentice Hall, 2003. p. 237.
17
CONCEPTS & STRATEGIES CONCERNING INTERCULTURAL COMPETENCES
According to Schneider/ Barsoux (2003), the degrees of assertiveness and cooperativeness are
determined by someone’s hierarchical status, i.e. his/ her power and stakes in the interaction. The
model is based, to a large extent, on the hierarchical relationship between the parties involved, as the
following elaborations and examples of the five different modes will show.
The competing (or dominating) mode involves “conflict tactics that push for a person’s own position or
goal above and beyond the other person’s conflict interest”9. This can be done by pointing out a
difference in hierarchical status, as the example shows.
Example:
•
At a team meeting, a conflict arises between the project manager and a team member. The
team member is in a subordinate position but wants to bring his point across. The project
manager, however, plays the status card and brushes the issue of the table by saying, “I’m the
boss here and I say this is how we are going to do it.” The project manager clearly employs a
dominating mode of conflict resolution and shuts down all other attendees of the meeting. After
experiencing such an outburst, it is highly unlikely that the further discussion will be fruitful
because it produces anxiety in the team members.
The mode of collaborating (or integrating) “reflects the need for closure in conflict and involves high
concern for one’s self and high concern for the other in substantive conflict negotiation.”10
Example:
•
Sweden, where power is supposed to be equally distributed, there seems to be more concern
for the quality of relationships and mutual gain. Conflict resolution will likely be achieved
through collaboration.
Compromising is understood as a “give-and-take concession approach to reach a midpoint agreement
concerning the conflict content issue.”11 Here, the focus lies more on the content of discussion than
9
Ting-Toomey, Stella. “Translating Conflict Face-Negotiation Theory Into Practice.” In: SAGE Handbook of Intercultural Training. 3rd ed. SAGE
Publications: Thousand Oaks, CA. 2004. p.229.
10
Ting-Toomey, Stella. ”Translating Conflict Face-Negotiation Theory Into Practice.” SAGE Publications, 2004. p.229.
11
Ibid.
18
CONCEPTS & STRATEGIES CONCERNING INTERCULTURAL COMPETENCES
relational or identity-based respect. Compromising is a mode of conflict management that can either be
employed by one party alone or simultaneously by all parties involved in a communicative setting.
Example:
•
In order to keep a meeting/ discussion going, the project team members agree to take into
account all different ideas and opinions that were brought forth throughout the discussion.
In the avoiding mode, the person in question eludes the “conflict topic, the conflict party, or the conflict
situation altogether.”12 This mode is usually employed to maintain mutual face interests and relational
network interests, i.e. to ensure both parties’ interests are served. When power is low, there is only little
hope for mutual gain and, consequently, little interest in pursuing a relationship.
Examples:
•
In an individualist country, such as France, power is generally distributed unequally. When this is
the case, conflicts are usually dealt with through avoidance, and then, after a while, by
confronting the opposing other.
•
Avoidance can be a powerful tactic. Japanese business men use silence as power against rather
talkative Americans when negotiating business deals and often satisfy their interest.
•
In saving-face countries (e.g. Japan), conflict is avoided in public to preserve relationships and
maintain maximum flexibility in satisfying mutual obligation.
•
Avoidance can preserve team harmony and the leader’s authority status.
The accommodating (or obliging) mode is the “high concern for the other’s conflict interest above and
beyond one’s own conflict interest.”13 Just as avoiding, the mode of obliging is frequently used to find a
solution that satisfies the interest of the parties involved.
Example:
12
13
Ibid.
Ibid.
19
CONCEPTS & STRATEGIES CONCERNING INTERCULTURAL COMPETENCES
•
In Japan, like in most relationship-oriented countries, interests are defined and perceived as
mutual. This means that a subordinate expects (and is expected) to submit to his/her boss (=low
perceived power). Furthermore, in business relations, the buyer is obliged to take care of the
seller by building long-term business relationships (interdependence & mutual obligation).
In addition to these five modes of communication, Ting-Toomey (2004) mentions three additional
factors that influence or inform conflict resolution (all of which go beyond the scope of this module and
cannot be discussed in detail): 14
•
emotions
•
third-party consultation
•
passive-aggressive types of conflict tactics
2.2.2. Communication styles across cultures
High- and low-context cultures influence the style of communication in conflict resolution. The terms
have been coined by Edward T. Hall in 1976 and refer to “a culture’s tendency to use high-context
messages over low-context messages in routine communication.”15 In higher-context cultures, many
things are explained through the shared cultural background of a group and do not need to be explicitly
stated. The focus here is on word choice, since fewer words convey more meaning than in lower-context
cultures. In low-context culture, the speaker has to be much more specific because it follows that notion
that more words convey more meaning and the value of a single word is less important.
The differences in communicative behavior between high- and low-context cultures often become
visible in intercultural business settings, especially when nationality and ethnicity come into play.
2.2.2.1 High-context cultures
As stated above, communication takes place much more implicitly in high-context cultures.
Communicators expect and are expected to share a common knowledge that one falls back on in verbal
14
Ibid.
Wikipedia contributors. "High- and low-context cultures." Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia, 26 Jun. 2014.
Web. 21 Sep. 2014.
15
20
CONCEPTS & STRATEGIES CONCERNING INTERCULTURAL COMPETENCES
exchanges. The following list16 gives the most important key points of communication in high-context
cultures:
•
Communication is less verbally specific and there is generally less written or formal information
provided.
•
Communicators have a kind of internalized understanding of what is communicated.
•
High-context communication is frequently employed between people who have had a long term
(business or personal) relationship.
•
Expresses a sense of belonging and makes visible who belongs to a certain group of people and
who is excluded as the cultural ‘outsider’.
•
Knowledge is situational and relational.
•
Decisions and activities focus around face-to-face relationships, often around a central
authoritarian person.
•
People express themselves in a roundabout way and would never directly criticize someone, for
instance.
•
Keeping-face (one’s own and that of the other) is considered the most important premise.
Examples for high-context cultures:
•
Family gatherings
•
Business dealings with long-term clients/ team members
•
Employees of the same department of a company
•
In general terms, certain societies/ nationalities/ cultures, e.g. Arabian culture, Japan, Mexico,
China, Turkey (respect of ‘social distance’, e.g. difference in age or social status)
2.2.2.2 Low-context cultures
In low-context cultures, communication is expected to be much more explicit. People who communicate
with one another have to state directly what they would like to say, since the level of shared knowledge
is expected to be relatively low. The key points of low-context communication are:
16
Taken from: Beer, Jennifer E. “High and Low Context”. Culture at Work. 21 Sep. 2014. http://www.culture-atwork.com/highlow.html
21
CONCEPTS & STRATEGIES CONCERNING INTERCULTURAL COMPETENCES
•
People play by external rules (rule orientation).
•
Knowledge is on average more codified (i.e. expressed more directly), public, external, and
accessible.
•
Time, space, activities, and relationships can be limited, separated, or sequenced.
•
The personal connections are, though limited in time, rather deep.
•
Knowledge can be transferred more easily.
•
Communication is centered on a specific task at hand. Responsibility is distributed equally.
Decisions and activities focus on what needs to be done.
•
Members of low-context cultures are better able to separate a conflict issue from the person
involved in the conflict.
•
The argumentation style is factual-inductive.
Examples for low-context cultures:
•
Business dealings with new team members, partners, clients.
•
In general terms, certain societies/ nationalities/ cultures, e.g. USA, Germany
In regard to approaches of conflict resolution, there is a fundamental difference in attitude between
high- and low-context cultures.17 On the one hand, members of high-context cultures avoid direct
confrontation by employing a calculated degree of vagueness, typically in the face of tension and
anxiety. To disagree openly or to confront somebody in public is unthinkable and considered an extreme
insult of the other person/ the conflict partner. This is the case because to members of high-context
cultures, the conflict issue and the conflict topic are inseparable, i.e. to disagree with someone’s
different opinion means to disrespect the person per se. In their eyes, the direct communication that
members of low-context cultures employ is rude.
Members of low-context cultures, on the other hand, are more action oriented, so they are more likely
to assume direct confrontation in conflict situations. It can be quite frustrating for them when they
17
Cf. Earley, P.C. and C.B. Gibson. „Ch. 4: Individual and Group-Level Elements.” In: Multinational Work Teams. A New Perspective. Routledge:
New York, NY. 2008. pp. 104-105.
22
CONCEPTS & STRATEGIES CONCERNING INTERCULTURAL COMPETENCES
encounter low-context cultural conflict styles and perceive them to be ‘wishy-washy’ or just simply
ambivalent.
Often enough, these different communication styles lead to conflict that cannot be dissolved easily if the
parties involved are not (made) aware of these differences.
2.3 Organizational Culture
In addition to different conflict and communication styles, cultural differences can also be observed at
the level of practices in different kind of organizations or companies. These differences are particularly
relevant in a globalized working world where people have to adapt to different kinds of organizational
cultures during their working life. Furthermore, employees have to work together with employees who
have a different understanding of cooperation in an organizational context because of their cultural
background.
Differences in organizational culture are strongly interconnected to differences in national cultures that
are rooted in a difference of values. Though cultural differences at the level of values are more deeply
rooted in the minds and behavior of people, the differences in organizational culture are more tangible
because they become evident in concrete daily practices. To understand the dimensions of differences
in organizational culture helps to understand different expectations and behavior of people at the work
place.
A model for dimensions of cultural differences among organizations was developed by Geert Hofstede.18
Based on observations in companies Hofstede defined six dimensions of cultural differences among
organizations:
Power distance
The dimension of power distance describes to what extent people in organizations expect and accept an
unequal distribution of power.
Individualism vs. collectivism
18
Hofstede, Geert. Culture’s Consequences – Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions and Organizations Across Nations. Thousand Oaks,
London, New Delhi: SAGE. 2001.
23
CONCEPTS & STRATEGIES CONCERNING INTERCULTURAL COMPETENCES
This dimension differs between cultures that emphasize the rights of individuals and cultures that give
priority to collective goals. While individualistic cultures highlight self-responsibility and selfdetermination, collectivistic cultures subordinate individual interests and perspectives to the
achievement of collective goals.
Uncertainty avoidance
Uncertainty avoidance describes the extent to which members of a culture feel threatened by
ambiguous or unknown situations. Cultures with strong uncertainty avoidance tend to a high level of
regulation and intolerance towards different religions and convictions. Cultures with weak uncertainty
avoidance tend to have fewer and more flexible regulations as well as more tolerance towards different
religions and convictions.
Masculinity vs. femininity
Masculinity describes a culture in which gender roles are clearly distinct. Men are expected to be
assertive, tough, and focused on material success. Women are supposedly to be more modest, tender,
and concerned with the quality of life. Femininity describes a culture in which gender roles overlap. Both
men and women are supposed to be modest, tender, and concerned with quality of life.
Long-term-orientation vs. short-term-orientation
This dimension describes how far the planning horizon in a culture is. Cultures with a long-termorientation tend to canniness and persistence. Cultures with a short-term-orientation tend to flexibility
and egoism.
Indulgence vs. restraint
Indulgence stands for a culture that allows relatively free gratification of basic and natural human drives
regarding enjoying life and having fun. Restraint stands for a culture that suppresses gratification of
needs and regulates it by means of strict social norms.
24
CONCEPTS & STRATEGIES CONCERNING INTERCULTURAL COMPETENCES
Overview of the six dimensions of cultural differences among organizations developed by Geert Hofstede
Power distance
Large power distance
Low power distance
•
people expect and accept unequal distribution of
power
•
people accept a hierarchical order in which everybody
has a place and which needs no further justification
•
people strive to equalize the distribution of power
•
people demand justification for inequalities of power
Individualism vs. collectivism
Collectivism
Individualism
•
preference for a tightly-knit framework in society in
which individuals can expect their relatives or
members of a particular in-group to look after them in
exchange for unquestioning loyalty
•
people’s self-image is defined in terms of “we”
•
preference for a loosely-knit social framework in which
individuals are expected to take care of only
themselves and their immediate families
•
people’s self-image is defined in terms of “I”
Uncertainty avoidance
Strong uncertainty avoidance
Weak uncertainty avoidance
•
threatened by ambiguous or unknown situations
•
high level of regulation
•
intolerance towards unorthodox behavior and ideas
•
more relaxed attitude towards uncertainty and
ambiguity
•
practice counts more than principles
•
tolerance towards unorthodox behavior and ideas
Masculinity vs. femininity
Masculinity
Femininity
•
clearly distinct gender roles
•
overlapping gender roles
•
preference for achievement, heroism, assertiveness
and material rewards for success
•
preference for cooperation, modesty, caring for the
weak and quality of life
•
more competitive
•
more consensus-orientated
Long-term-orientation vs. short-term-orientation
Long-term-orientation
Short-term-orientation
•
long planning horizon
•
short planning horizon
•
canniness and persistence
•
flexibility and egoism
Indulgence vs. restraint
Indulgence
•
relatively free gratification of basic and natural human
drives in regard to enjoying life and having fun
Restraint
•
suppressing gratification of needs and regulates it by
means of strict social norms
25
CONCEPTS & STRATEGIES CONCERNING INTERCULTURAL COMPETENCES
The model was further developed by Bob Waisfisz. In collaboration with Geert Hofstede Bob Waisfisz
identified the following eight dimensions of cultural differences among organizations:
Overview of the eight dimensions of cultural differences among organizations developed by Bob Waisfisz
Means-oriented vs. goals-oriented
Means-oriented
Goals-oriented
•
key feature is the way in which work has to be carried
out
•
preference for the achievement of internal goals or
results
•
people identify with the “how”
•
people identify with the “what”
•
risk avoiding
•
willingness to take a risk
•
limited effort on the jobs
Internally driven vs. externally driven
Internally driven
•
Externally driven
employees perceive their task towards the outside
world as totally given, based on the idea that business
ethics and honesty matters most and that they know
best what is good for the customer and the world at
large
•
the only emphasis is on meeting the customer’s
requirements
•
results are most important
•
a pragmatic rather than an ethical attitude prevails
Easygoing work discipline vs. strict work discipline
Easygoing work discipline
•
loose internal structure
•
a lack of predictability
•
little control and discipline
•
improvisation and surprises
Strict work discipline
•
People are very cost-conscious, punctual and serious
Local vs. professional
Local
Professional
•
employees identify with the boss and/or the unit in
which they work
•
identity of an employee is determined by his
profession and/or the content of the job
•
employees are very short-term directed
•
long-term orientation
•
they are internally focused
•
externally focused
•
there is strong social control to be like everybody else
Open system vs. closed system
Open system
•
newcomers are welcome immediately
•
one is open both to insiders and outsiders
•
belief that almost anyone would fit in the organization
Closed system
•
reluctance towards newcomers and outsides
26
CONCEPTS & STRATEGIES CONCERNING INTERCULTURAL COMPETENCES
Employee-oriented vs. work-oriented
Employee-oriented
•
Work-oriented
members of staff feel that personal problems are
taken into account and that the organization takes
responsibility for the welfare of its employees, even if
this is at the expense of the work
•
heavy pressure to perform the task even if this is at
the expense of employees
Degree of acceptance of leadership style
Low degree
•
High degree
leadership style of direct boss is not in line with the
respondent’s preferences
•
leadership style of direct boss is in line with the
respondent’s preferences
Degree of identification with the organization
Low degree
•
low degree of identification with the organization in its
totality or with different aspects like internal goals,
clients, own group or direct boss
High degree
•
high degree of identification with the organization in
its totality or with different aspects like internal goals,
clients, own group or direct boss
2.4 Leadership styles
The successes and failures of a business/ company depend, to a large extent, on the hierarchic
structures and leadership style used in the organizational structure. It is important to note that there is
no all-purpose attitude that will be successful for every leader in all instances. Depending on different
factors, such as business goals, employees’ skill-level, and the industry itself, one type of leadership
might actually work more productively than another.19
19
„Leadership Styles in Business – The 3 Main Types.“ http://www.sooperarticles.com/self-improvement-articles/leadershiparticles/leadership-styles-business-3-main-types-594871.html#ixzz3G6t0HG3n . Last accessed: 14 Oct 2014.
27
CONCEPTS & STRATEGIES CONCERNING INTERCULTURAL COMPETENCES
20
Figure 2. Leadership Styles
Kurt Lewin established three main leadership styles in his early influential study (1939): authoritarian
(autocratic) leadership, participative (democratic) leadership, and delegative (laissez-faire) leadership.
Autocratic (authoritarian) leadership gives all control to the leaders, meaning that they are fully in
charge of making the decisions. They provide clear expectations for what needs to be done, when it
should be done, and how it should be done. This style of leadership is strongly focused on both
command by the leader and control of the followers. There is also a clear division between the leader
and the followers. Authoritarian leaders make decisions independently with little to no input from the
rest of the group.21 As research has shown, decision-making was less creative under authoritarian
leadership and that moving from an authoritarian style to a democratic style is much harder than vice
versa.
20
Clark, Donald. „Leadership Styles.“ http://www.nwlink.com/~donclark/leader/leadstl.html. Last accessed: 14 Oct 2014.
For the description of leadership styles, please cf: Cherry, Kendra. „Lewin’s Leadership Styles – The three major styles of leadership.“
http://psychology.about.com/od/leadership/a/leadstyles.htm Last accessed: 14 Oct 2014.
21
28
CONCEPTS & STRATEGIES CONCERNING INTERCULTURAL COMPETENCES
POSITIVE
NEGATIVE
The authoritarian approach is best employed When abused, the authoritarian style is usually
where
viewed as:
•
there is little time for group decisionmaking
•
bossy
•
controlling
•
the leader is the most knowledgeable
member of the group
•
dictatorial
•
decisive and rapid decisions are needed
•
•
staff might not hold the skills or
knowhow to look after their own
individual workloads
creating a hostile environment where
the followers are pitted against the
dominating leader
•
negatively affecting creativity and
innovation
Participative (or democratic) leadership is generally the most effective leadership style. Democratic
leaders offer guidance to group members, but they also participate in the group and allow input from
other group members. This means that the groups is granted some decision-making, insofar as they’re
consulted and asked for their opinions by those in charge. Lewin found that people working with the
democratic style are generally less productive than members of authoritarian groups; however, their
contributions and results are of much higher quality, due to the collaborative nature of this leadership
style.
POSITIVE
NEGATIVE
• participative
leaders
encourage
group
members to participate but retain the final
say over the decision-making process
• group
members
feel
appreciated
• decisions may take longer to implement
• the leader still has the opportunity to shut
down the ideas of others and pushing for his/
and
her own
important
• group members are more motivated and
creative
• fosters commitment to goals of the group
29
CONCEPTS & STRATEGIES CONCERNING INTERCULTURAL COMPETENCES
Delegative (laissez-faire) leadership is a fairly relaxed leadership style. As shown in Lewin’s research,
produces the least productive results. Members of the group tend to make more demands to the leader,
show little cooperative effort, and are sometimes even unable to work independently.
POSITIVE
•
can be effective in situations where
NEGATIVE
•
delegative leaders offer little to no
guidance to group members
•
decision-making is completely left to
group members
•
often leads to poorly defined roles and
lack of motivation
•
members often blame each other for
mistakes
•
members refuse to accept personal
responsibility
•
members produce a lack of progress and
group members are highly qualified in an
area of expertise
•
makes group members feel important
due to the high level of responsibility
and independence
work
30
CONCEPTS & STRATEGIES CONCERNING INTERCULTURAL COMPETENCES
→ When is which style best employed?22
A good leader uses all three styles, depending on what forces are involved between the followers, the
leader, and the situation.
Some examples include:
•
Using an authoritarian style on a new employee who is just learning the job. The leader is
competent and a good coach. The employee is motivated to learn a new skill. The situation is a
new environment for the employee.
•
Using a participative style with a team of workers who know their jobs. The leader knows the
problem, but does not have all the information. The employees know their jobs and want to
become part of the team.
•
Using a delegative style with a worker who knows more about the job than the leader. The
leader cannot do everything and the employee needs to take ownership of the job. In addition,
this allows the leader to be more productive.
•
Using all three: Telling your employees that a procedure is not working correctly and a new one
must be established (authoritarian). Asking for their ideas and input on creating a new
procedure (participative). Delegating the tasks in order to implement the new procedure
(delegative).
Forces that may influence the style to be used:
22
•
Amount of time available
•
Are relationships based on respect and trust or on disrespect?
•
Who has the information – the leader, the employee, or both?
•
How well the employees are trained and how well the leader knows the task
•
Internal conflicts
•
Stress levels
•
Type of task: structured, unstructured, complicated, or simple?
Clark, Donald. „Leadership Styles.“ http://www.nwlink.com/~donclark/leader/leadstl.html. Last accessed: 14 Oct 2014.
31
CONCEPTS & STRATEGIES CONCERNING INTERCULTURAL COMPETENCES
•
Laws or established procedures, such as training plans or OSHAs (Operational Safety and Health
Administration)
•
etc.
2.5 Intercultural Sensitivity – Developing an Ethno-Relativistic Worldview23
Intercultural sensitivity is a process of altering the perception of one’s own and other cultures through
becoming aware, or being made aware, of the values of diversity. This process can be divided into three
main stages: ethnocentric worldview, transition, and ethno-relative worldview.
Ethnocentric worldview is a stage in which cultural differences are not perceived but rather negated.
Cultures are evaluated through one’s subjective categories of value. This state of denying is often
expressed by a person’s disinterest and differences are usually considered irrelevant. In order to
maintain this worldview, cultures often remain separated, e.g. by avoiding journeys in other cultural
territories.
The defense mechanism can be seen as the first step towards developing ‘intercultural sensitivity’. The
individual begins to notice differences between himself/ herself and other cultures but does not
immerse himself into the other culture. In this stage, a person experiences culture through superficial
categories, such as ‘food’, ‘architecture’, ‘rituals of welcoming’, etc. S/he begins to consider her/his
culture to be superior to the other and polarizes cultural differences in a ‘we/us’ vs. ‘they/them’
dichotomy. This is called the stage of reversal. The following statements are common for people who
see the world in an ethnocentric way:
•
“There are no different cultures. Everyone is equal.” (denial)
•
“There are different cultures, but mine is superior.” (defense)
•
“My culture is better than yours.” (reversal)
In the transition phase, individuals overcome their stereotypical thinking and romanticizing attitudes
towards other cultures. This minimization of cultures can be considered a progression from ethnocentric
23
For ‘stages of intercultural sensitivity’, please cf.: Annette Gisevius, Tom Kehrbaum, Karsten Meier, Frauke Peter. „3. Theorie-Praxis-Dialog.
Aspekte ‚Interkultureller Kompetenz‘. Methoden internationaler Bildungsarbeit im Praxistest.“ IGM Qualitätsentwicklung in der Bildungsarbeit.
Bad Orb, 15./16.04.2010. pp. 22-23.
32
CONCEPTS & STRATEGIES CONCERNING INTERCULTURAL COMPETENCES
thinking. The individual is now able to notice similarities between his own and the other culture and
focusses less on differences. Consequently, cultural commonalities and universal human values become
more important. Minimization enables people to have a better understanding of different cultures:
•
“I have my culture and others have theirs, and that’s okay. In the end, we are all human. We eat,
we drink. Differences are more visible between individuals.” (minimization)
When the individual is aware of the multiplicity of ‘cultures’, their similarities and differences, s/he is
more likely to develop an ethno-relative worldview, i.e. moving into a state of accepting, adapting, and
integrating cultural specifics.
Acceptance manifests itself in the awareness and understanding that one’s culture is only one of many
possible worldview. In this stage, individuals fully grasp the cultural differences, e.g. way of life,
structure, and diversity, between their own and another culture. Additionally, acceptance includes the
revelation that one’s own culture does not always provide an explanation for the way others view the
world.
The step of adaptation uses the ‘results’ of accepting cultural differences in order to enable the person
to act and behave in a culturally-adequate way. This includes taking one’s own repertoire of behavior
and adapting it to a given cultural context. Once this has taken place, the individual moves into the final
stage of developing intercultural sensitivity.
In this last phase, s/he tries to integrate behavioral patterns and ways of thinking from different cultural
backgrounds into his/ her own personality. This does not necessarily mean a better preparation for the
individual to successfully handle intercultural situations. It is, however, rather typical for members of
non-dominant minorities, “global nomads”, or expatriates who return to their home country after a long
stay abroad. Integration concludes a person’s progression from an ethnocentric into an ethno-relative
worldview:
•
“There are various cultures and lifestyles. I think it’s interesting and I would like to learn more
about it.” (acceptance)
•
“I view the world in a different way and behave differently.” (adaptation)
•
“I live in both worlds!” (integration)
33
CONCEPTS & STRATEGIES CONCERNING INTERCULTURAL COMPETENCES
3. STRATEGIES OF
INTERVENTION – THE
MODERATOR’S ROLE
IN INTERCULTURAL
CONFLICT
RESOLUTION
34
CONCEPTS & STRATEGIES CONCERNING INTERCULTURAL COMPETENCES
3. Strategies of Intervention – The Moderator’s Role in
Intercultural Conflict Resolution
When dealing with the conflicting ideas, beliefs, and needs of people, the moderator can follow a basic
structure which helps organize any conflict management.
3.1 The Six Steps to Conflict Resolution24
The moderation cycle consists of six steps that form a simple, logical, and comprehensible process
toward the resolution of a conflict.
1. Introducing: The moderator officially opens the meeting, outlines the process of conflict resolution,
and builds confidence in the participating parties.
2. Collecting: This step mainly serves to figure out what the conflict is about in detail and what needs
to be addressed.
3. Selecting: Here, the moderator selects or prioritizes the topics to be addressed and, then, begins
with the most urgent issue.
4. Processing: In this phase, conflicting issues are worked out. ‘Hidden feelings’, i.e. underlying feelings
which fuel the conflict under the surface, are addressed. If there is a way to real conflict resolution,
it is achieved mainly through processing of feelings rather than negating their existence. Emotional
scratches, bruises, and scars should be spoken about explicitly. Anxiety, fears, (secret) wishes,
(unfulfilled) hope, etc. must be given the attention they require.
5. Planning: After processing the misunderstandings, conflicts, hopes, etc., it may be possible to set up
contracts and draft agreements for how to continue on.
6. Concluding: At the end of each conflict resolution process, it is important to reflect on the process.
Has everything been addressed? Did something remain unsaid? How do I/ you evaluate the
situation? How am I/ are you doing?
24
The following information is taken from: Seifert, Joseph W. Moderation und Konfliktklärung. Gabal: Offenbach,
2009. pp. 38-85.
35
CONCEPTS & STRATEGIES CONCERNING INTERCULTURAL COMPETENCES
In the following, the individual steps will be further elaborated and explained by use of example
questions that the participants or the moderator may use to clarify the conflict.
3.1.1 Introducing
The first phase of conflict moderation is usually profoundly affected by the participants’ passive
behavior: waiting, careful observation, tension, and insecurities are typical. The involved parties may ask
themselves a variety of questions:
•
“What are we doing here?”
•
“What impression does the moderator leave me with?”
•
“Can I trust the moderator?”
•
“I wonder how this process is going to take place…”
•
“Is everyone going to participate?”
•
“What can/ should I expect?”
•
“Hopefully this doesn’t end in a worse situation than before we started…”etc.
Some people may have already participated in a team development session or a conflict resolution and
may have made more or less positive and negative experiences with it. Some may not be comfortable
with ‘psychological games’. This is why it is very important to build trust and help participants settle into
the situation. It is the moderator’s responsibility to help ease the beginning of the conflict resolution.
In this phase, it is not about sugar-coating the situation or trying to explain oneself or the conflict in too
great a detail. The introduction should be brief and, depending on the context, include an official
opening. If the conflict arose in a project team meeting and can be tackled in the same setting without a
special conflict resolution meeting, the introduction may fall a lot shorter. Here are some ideas on how
to begin the initial phase:
•
Explains why and how the meeting was set up
•
Clarifies the aim of the conflict resolution (e.g. by asking the parties involved, “In your opinion,
what is the most important aspect that needs to be addressed today/ before we go on?”)
36
CONCEPTS & STRATEGIES CONCERNING INTERCULTURAL COMPETENCES
•
Introduces is role of the conflict moderator: “I am here to help you figure out a way to resolve
the issue.”; “I will mediate between the two (or more) opposing parties”; “I am objective, a bystander, and not emotionally involved.” etc.
•
In case of a conflict resolution workshop, the introduction might be done by the team leader
instead: “Welcome to our workshop. We are here today to determine our positions. We will
reflect on our cooperation and try to find a way of optimizing it. Mr. X (moderator) will support
us today as a moderator. […]”
•
Clarifies his role: In order to give orientation to participants and minimize resistance towards the
conflict resolution, the process should be made clear. Thus, it is helpful for the moderator to explain
his own role to the conflict partners, e.g. by saying,
o
“I am the moderator. I am not an expert in this field but I am here to help you through the
process of explaining the different work processes and support you as best as I can. I will try
to remain as objective as possible. In this instance, I have no oligation to anyone in
particular but I am here to help all of you.”
•
Clarifies fears/ anxieties, achieved through questions like,
o
“How are you feeling in this particular moment?”
o
“Are there any circumstances that limit your ability to get involved in the conflict
resolution?” (This gives the moderator the opportunity to learn about experiences,
expectations, and fears)
•
o
“What would you like to see happen/ how would you like this to proceed?” etc.
o
It is important that each and every person involved answers the questions truthfully.
Distinguishes personal versus private: Should an attendee fear that the conflict resolution process
will bring forth issues that s/he considers too personal, it might be quite helpful to verbally make a
distinction between the private and the personal:
o
Personal: the subjective view of each and every conflict partner should be taken seriously,
acknowledged, and considered.
37
CONCEPTS & STRATEGIES CONCERNING INTERCULTURAL COMPETENCES
o
Private: private matters, such as a person’s familial situation, his/ her hobbies, preferences
and dislikes should not be discussed. An exception can be made only if a private matter has
an impact on the cooperation between group members.
o
Disturbances are priority: if a discussion partner leaves the room, there will be a break for
everyone. The person leaving has to explain why s/he is leaving and when s/he will return.
This makes it easier for the moderator and the conflict partners to estimate the situation
accordingly.
•
Explains the necessity of discretion:
o
e.g. “What is being said in this room will not be repeated to anyone who is not present
today. This goes for you and me equally.”
Transition into the content phase
The moderator should conclude the introductory phase by asking whether the process has become clear
to everyone and, if there are no more questions, transitions into the actual resolving process. S/he can
do so by asking, “Are we ready now?/ Can we start now?”. By keeping eye contact to the members of
the group, s/he makes sure the participating parties are attentive and receptive.
3.1.2 Collecting
This is where the content level begins. First, it is necessary to determine which aspects need to be
addressed most urgently. On a rather abstract level, this should be clear to everybody. However, it helps
to spell out what exactly is bugging the participants.
In conflict resolution, the moderator does not collect opinions by asking conflict partners to write on
cards to verbally express their views. The collection methods are rather analogous and enable the
moderator to focus on origins of and reasons for a conflict. In this special situation, one needs to choose
a way of collecting opinions that does not neglect the emotions that informed the conflict in the first
place. The following methods reach farther than ‘regular’ moderation techniques:
•
Team sketching
•
Weather map
•
Scratches, scars, and wounds
38
CONCEPTS & STRATEGIES CONCERNING INTERCULTURAL COMPETENCES
•
Wishing wishes
•
[Making a collage] not elaborated any further
•
[Silent writing] not elaborated any further
By employing one of these methods, one makes visible the emotional database which the group can
utilize in the here and now of the situation. They are intended to display the individuals’ personal
subjective view of the conflict. The moderator needs to understand how the individual views his/ her
team and the conflict situation in the most honest way possible.
TEAM SKETCHING
Time frame: 15 minutes
Material: Flip chart sheets, Pens
Description
Team sketching is a simple technique which can be used to establish the basis for every conflict
resolution. The participants are asked to make a sketch of the current situation in the team and share it
with the others. Each person reflects on their own opinion and expresses their individual standpoint in
the sketch. Consequently, the moderator learns about the basic underlying issues that caused the
conflict. Of course, this method is also intended to bring about an ‘aha moment’ for the other
participants who might not even be aware of a specific problem.
Procedure
The method is best introduced by stating that the group will now use a somewhat exotic, extraordinary
method that will reveal a clear overview of the situation. The moderation of this phase might look
something like the following:
“Now we will begin our work on the content level. It is necessary for me to understand how each and
every one of you views the problem. Please take a flip chart sheet and pens and draw a picture of the
current situation – the way you see it – completely subjective and incomplete. It is important that you
39
CONCEPTS & STRATEGIES CONCERNING INTERCULTURAL COMPETENCES
are able to illustrate the situation using your drawing and that the others and I can understand your very
personal point of view.”
The participants have 15 minutes to draw their team sketch. Afterwards, they present their result to the
rest of the group.
Rules
•
The youngest employee begins presenting, the senior finishes. The person that has been with
the company/ team the shortest amount of time may have the least tainted view of the
problem. S/he may not be as deeply involved in the interplay of the team and may be able to
explain in a neutral way how the team presents itself to the outside world. Additionally, s/he
can express how s/he was welcomed by the team.
•
If the team has made a member the ‘scapegoat’, this person should take the last turn. If it is
clear from the beginning who is ‘to blame for the whole situation’, it may be helpful to hear the
others’ opinions first. When the scapegoat begins, it can add fuel to the fire of those presenting
afterwards and give them the opportunity to respond to the scapegoat’s view of things.
•
The manager/ boss should take the last turn, since s/he is in an elevated position relative to the
other team members. Their opinion is of high importance and influences the others in a special
way. By choosing this order, the team is less likely to orientate themselves towards what was
said by the manager.
The moderator’s role
In this method, the moderator takes the backseat and remains passive for the most part. During the
presentation, s/he should try to look for the following points:
•
How close or distant do the team members seem to be in each sketch?
•
What roles does hierarchy play in the sketch? Who is inferior, who superior?
•
What colors and symbols did the team member use?
•
Are all team members represented in the sketch? Who is missing, and why?
•
Where are the team members situated? Why in this position and not elsewhere?
40
CONCEPTS & STRATEGIES CONCERNING INTERCULTURAL COMPETENCES
It is quite helpful to take notes of what is being presented. The notes can later be used for the
systematic sketch in the processing phase (Step 4).
WEATHER MAP
Time frame: 15 min
Material: Flip chart sheets, pens
Description
The weather map is an altered version of the team sketch. The difference becomes clear when
considering the moderation of the method. The moderator asks:
“How has the weather been lately? [If there is a specific time frame in which the conflict arose, name it!]
Warm? Hot? Cold? Chilly? Unsettled? Has it been foggy or sunny, bright or dark? Has there been a
storm? Lightning? Hail? When did the weather change, and how? What is the weather like now?”
Procedure
The team members have 15 minutes to draw their individual weather map on a flip chart sheet. As in
the team sketching method, participants present their results to the rest of the group.
The moderator’s task
Please refer to the method ‘team sketching’ above.
SCRATCHES, SCARS, AND WOUNDS (OR: TRAFFIC LIGHT)
Time frame: 15 minutes
Material: Moderation cards (red, yellow, green), pens
Description:
41
CONCEPTS & STRATEGIES CONCERNING INTERCULTURAL COMPETENCES
This method is a special form of the classic writing cards method. The moderator asks the participants
to write down the emotional scratches, scars, and wounds that they have collected since the beginning
of the cooperation. The method reveals even those emotional wounds that have remained untreated
but still have an impact on the cooperation within the team.
Procedure:
The moderator introduces the method (see moderator’s task). Afterwards, participants have 15 minutes
to write their cards. In the presenting phase, turn-taking will be handled as described above according to
the duration of involvement with the team and the hierarchical position (bottom-to-top). Every team
member explains their cards from scratches to scars to wounds. Again, this method is about making
visible the personal, subjective views and opinions of each person involved in the conflict. For later
referral, the cards can be displayed at a pin board.
Rules:
•
Green cards should be used for scratches, an issue that has irritated the person about another
team member but did not leave a permanent mark on their relationship.
•
Yellow cards should be used for scars, a bigger issue that has already left a permanent mark on a
relationship. A scar is something one can live with but cannot let go of completely.
•
Red cards are for wounds, a bigger issue that is currently still open and needs to be taken care
of. It is something urgent that has to be expressed and resolved.
The moderator’s task:
The moderator could introduce the method with the following words:
“Now it is time to collect what we would like to address today. Please think about which issues are the
most pressing and should be resolved immediately. Please use the green, yellow, and green cards to
write down your emotional scratches, scars, and wounds so that we can address them later in the
group. Additionally, the cards will serve as your personal guideline of what is most urgent to you.”
42
CONCEPTS & STRATEGIES CONCERNING INTERCULTURAL COMPETENCES
WISHING WISHES
Time frame: 3-5 minutes per person, depending on the size of the group
Material:
Flip chart, with the caption “My Wishlist” and three alternative beginnings of sentences that each team
member will have to complete: “For the future, I wish that you… as you have done…/ more than
before…/ less than before or not at all…”
Description:
‘Wishing wishes’ is an indirect method in which participants word their criticism in a way that is oriented
towards the solution of the conflict. Its indirect nature is both the method’s strength and weakness. Its
strength lies in the wishing itself, since it may be easier for participants to express a wish towards a team
member rather than to openly criticize or hurt them. The method is a simple way of initiating an open
conversation about work relationships. Its weakness is, however, that it makes focusing on the origin of
the conflict quite hard. Expressing hopes for the future does not necessarily help solve a conflict. An
actual reconciliation is almost impossible to achieve if the roots of conflict are not addressed. Thorough
conflict resolution requires more than that. Should you decide to employ this method, however, it is
indispensable to ask lots of questions when participants present their wishes.
Procedure:
The moderator puts the flip chart with the pre-formulated sentence beginnings in the center so that
everybody has a clear view of it. Each team member now completes the sentences for all other
members that are present.
To make the method more direct, the moderator can ask the addressee whether s/he is willing and able
to fulfill the requested wish and possibly make a contract that binds him/ her to the promise. In conflict
resolution, however, it is important not to question or negotiate the wishes right away. Instead, they
should be noted down for future reference. Consequently, the wish lists do not serve as basis for
contracts but as a method of collecting what needs to be addressed in the process.
The moderator’s task:
43
CONCEPTS & STRATEGIES CONCERNING INTERCULTURAL COMPETENCES
The moderator is responsible for quickly preparing the flip chart as a supporting tool for the participants.
Furthermore, he can summarize the statements of the participants using key words.
→ When to use which method?
When emotional tensions are high, people are likely to be more talkative. Team sketching may be best
used in this situation to slow down and structure the process of conflict resolution. When participants
are nervous or scared of falling in disgrace or losing their job, it might be easier for them to make wishful
statements.
3.1.3 Selecting
Step 3 focuses on the visualization of key statements made by the team members in the collection
phase. The moderator selects the order in which the topics that were collected (step 2) should be dealt
with. This step is mainly about prioritizing topics. In ‘normal’ business moderation, the priorities would
be chosen according to which of the topics received the most points by all team members. In conflict
resolution, however, the moderator makes this decision based on the urgency of each underlying issue.
This way, team members are less likely to prioritize those issues that are least relevant to the conflict at
hand.
Material: Flip chart, pens
Method/ Moderator’s task
The moderator draws up a systematic or situational sketch which summarizes what s/he has heard and
understood from the other phases up to this point. For the sketch, the moderator follows these steps.
S/he:
•
draws a circle on the flip chart sheet.
•
writes down the names of all team members.
•
adds key statements that s/he noted down during the collection phase.
•
prioritizes those topics that affect the team as a whole.
•
divides the statements into three categories:
44
CONCEPTS & STRATEGIES CONCERNING INTERCULTURAL COMPETENCES
a) statements that affect the team on an interpersonal level: What did A say to B? What does C
“always” do to D? How does E treat F?
b) statements that persons make about themselves: “In the team I feel…” “It is difficult for me
to meet these expectations.”
c) statements that are entirely factual, e.g. the moderation of team meetings or the acquisition
of new software.
In the systematical sketch, a-statements will be
expressed as arrows, reaching from the person that
made the statement to the person that it was made
about.
←↑→↓↔↕↖↗↘↙
B-statements will be written on top or next to the
speaker’s name via speech or thought bubbles.
C-statements will be noted on a separate sheet. They
are of lowest priority and not directly relevant for
interpersonal conflicts.
Since the preparation for this method is rather time-consuming, it may be best to take set up a short
break for the team members. The moderator uses this time to draw up the sketch. Before the break,
team members should be reminded to not talk about what has been discussed. Everyone should be able
to hear what is being said which would not be possible during break time. When the basic sketch is
drawn and all participants have returned, the topic will be selected.
Rules for selection
•
Acute before chronic: Incidents that occurred a while ago have to be dug up and the memory be
refreshed. Anger about a recent incident is usually fresher.
•
Social before individual: conflict resolution is about working together. Individual feelings are
only relevant if they make cooperation difficult or are part of the problem. Private issues should
be dealt with in a private setting and are not part of conflict resolution.
45
CONCEPTS & STRATEGIES CONCERNING INTERCULTURAL COMPETENCES
•
Hierarchical before lateral: the team leader is responsible for making sure that processes run
smoothly, no matter if their leadership style is vertical or horizontal.
•
Personal before factual: Factual conflicts are easier resolved when the relationship between the
people involved is harmonious. When relationships are rocky, it makes little sense to address
factual issues before personal ones because the willingness for conflict resolution might be low.
Thus, interpersonal issues should always be treated with more urgency.
•
Internal before external: Problems that include a third party should be addressed last. Solutions
for internal problems are easier to find because they can be tackled in the current situation.
Conflict resolution aims at people speaking to and not about each other. However, external
problems need to be addressed in an appropriate setting at a later time if they affect team
cooperation.
3.1.4 Processing
In this phase of the conflict resolution, the moderator and participants employ communicative
techniques, such as questioning, listening, and giving feedback. Through the selection phase, the
participants may already have a better understanding of each other and the conflict at hand. However,
issues were only named but not properly discussed. Processing is about diving deeper into the conflict
topics and clearing them up.
The moderator’s role
The moderator may introduce this phase by presenting the systematical sketch from step 3 (selecting).
S/he can do so by adding to or correcting the sketch. When the visualization is finished and clear to
everyone, the moderator picks up the most urgent topic (following the order he decided on in step 3).
S/he reads the first statement from the sketch and asks the author to further explain what s/he means
by it. It is very important that the moderator employs active listening skills and questions the author
until the statement is completely clear to him and the rest of the group. The moderator then turns to
the ‘defendant’ and asks him, “Do you understand what s/he means?”. If the answer is, “No!”, the
defendant asks his accuser questions until s/he has at least a basic understanding. The moderator then
returns to the accuser, asking him, “How do you feel about what s/he just told you?”.
46
CONCEPTS & STRATEGIES CONCERNING INTERCULTURAL COMPETENCES
The purpose of the ‘ping-pong dialogue’ technique used in processing is not necessarily about sharing
the same opinion. Awareness and understanding are the most important aspects of this fourth step.
Everyone wants to be acknowledged and belong. This is why the dialogue should focus on things that
participants can do differently that may help solving the conflict and changing the situation for the
better. Processing the selected conflict topics helps solve conflicts by looking at issues that might not
have been addressed due to time or other reasons.
The following step of planning will only make sense if problems and underlying issues are clarified. The
moderator should try to keep participants from making fast arrangements or agreements for further
handling the conflict. S/he should take note of suggestions for resolving conflict and let the conflict
partners know that they will be brought up in the later phases of the process. This gives participants
time to think about the opinions which were revealed in the processing phase without making decisions
they might later regret or that wouldn’t hold up. The moderator may conclude this phase after
addressing the different conflict issues within the group by saying, “I would like to leave it at that. We
will come back to our result a little later and will try to find a common ground for further dealing with
the issues/ conflicts.”
3.1.5 Planning
In phase 5, the moderator addresses all suggestions, solutions, and agreements that the phases
collecting and processing may have produced. Every topic will be checked one last time and, if possible,
concluded in a collaborative effort by the participants and the moderator. Some topics might have
already been successfully resolved, others might require further consideration.
The moderator briefly names every topic and asks whether any agreements can be made or planned
further:
•
“Would you, Mrs. A and Mr. B, continue as you have already mentioned earlier, i.e. that both of
you will [do XYZ] in the future?”
•
“Has either one of you had an idea for how to resolve this, Mr. C and Mr. D?”
•
“Would you like to specify your thoughts from earlier, Mrs. E?”
•
“Mrs. F, how would you like to continue with Mrs. G regarding [XYZ]?”
•
“Can we leave it at that, Mr. H and Mrs. I, or would you prefer to make an agreement?”
47
CONCEPTS & STRATEGIES CONCERNING INTERCULTURAL COMPETENCES
People involved in conflicts will, generally, have a good understanding and ideas on how to move on
from the issues. The moderator should, however, point out the importance of making arrangements
between the conflicting parties. These can be made in written form or via verbal contracts.
Furthermore, the moderator should still remain in the position of the critic and ask pointed questions
that help participants formulate specific agreements. Helpful questions are:
•
“What precisely do you plan on doing now?”
•
“How will you know whether you succeeded or not?”
•
“How will you know that the agreement failed?”
•
“What precisely do you plan to do if things don’t turn out the way you had planned?”
•
“Could you incorporate some tools of controlling the process? What could they be?”
Should the participants still have a hard time finding a common ground, the moderator can think aloud.
However, s/he should not suggest solutions himself/ herself, since this would jeopardize the objective
role of the moderator. Thinking aloud avoids the danger of interfering with the conflict content. Rather
it sets impulses without putting pressure on the people involved.
•
“It really is tricky. From an outsider’s perspective, one could easily say, well, all you need to do is
[XYZ], but you might, of course, see it differently. They way it looks, this will not work for you.”
•
“One could say, you should do [XYZ], which might be a bit much to ask.”
S/he then transitions from his/ her input to the conclusion by stressing the responsibility of the
participants:
•
“Well, it is what it is. The question is, what you are going to make of it. What should happen
now? How do you move forward?”
If a real solution cannot be found, the moderator helps participants find solutions on the meta-level:
•
“What do you/we make out of not being able to find a solution at this point?”
48
CONCEPTS & STRATEGIES CONCERNING INTERCULTURAL COMPETENCES
The worst possible outcome of the processing phase is that a certain point needs to be postponed and
cannot be solved at the moment. If possible, a second round of conflict resolution might help clarify the
issue.
3.1.6 Concluding
In this last step, the moderator should briefly reflect on and conclude the conflict resolution process.
S/he can make use of the following methods:
•
Verbal flash lights: quickly summarizing the process verbally
•
Visualized flash lights: visualizing a reflective question and answering with help of sticky dots
Additionally, the conclusion phase gives participants the opportunity to comment on the moderator’s
role. In a direct question-and-answer, the moderator could ask:
•
“How are you feeling now? Would you like to say anything before we close?”
•
“Is there anything you would like to leave me with, anything you think I should learn to do?”
•
“Did I overlook, pressure, or frustrate you at any point during the process?”
•
“Did you feel treated fairly?”
•
“Did you feel comfortable with the way I led you through the process?”
If a participant complains about being treated unfairly, the moderator should take this last chance to
apologize. Of course, he should not explain himself/ herself in detail, but rather acknowledge the
participant’s feelings. The moderator might have basic questions of understanding, but will not
comment on them.
And what happens after the conflict resolution procedure?
Afterwards, the conflicting parties are left to their own. The moderator does not mediate between the
parties anymore. He can no longer directly support the group. It is, however, possible, to set up another
meeting to check in on the progress which has been made since the intervention. Alternatively,
telephone conversations can be set up.
49
CONCEPTS & STRATEGIES CONCERNING INTERCULTURAL COMPETENCES
3.2 Critical Situations and Possible Solutions25
In general, the people involved in a conflict situation will appreciate the support they receive from the
moderator when a conflict arises. However, when dealing with opposing ideas, it is the moderator’s task
to try and figure out the hidden reasons behind a conflict by digging into the parties’ hidden feelings and
convincing them to reveal causes for the conflict that may be of personal nature. This can, of course,
lead to emotional outbursts which can become visible in multiple ways. The following passages will
provide some helpful information about how to react to outbursts, disturbances, and refusals of working
on solving the conflict at hand.
Attacking the ‘setting’:
•
Expressed in statements like, “Where are the tables?” or, “I need a table!”
•
Possible reactions:
•
25
o
Use a calm voice
o
“We are working without tables!” or,
o
“We currently don’t need any tables!”
If that does not work:
o
“I can only offer you this approach. I work like this, it is my approach.”
o
“I have made great experiences with this approach.”
o
“I suggest you try it this way, alright?”
For the following strategies, please cf. Seifert, Joseph W. Moderation und Konfliktklärung. Gabal: Offenbach, 2009. pp. 138-142.
50
CONCEPTS & STRATEGIES CONCERNING INTERCULTURAL COMPETENCES
Refusing involvement:
•
Expressed in statements like, “I have nothing to say about that!”, or, “I won’t talk about things
this private.”
•
Possible reactions:
o
Allow it to happen and do not question the statement. However, you can point out the
difference between personal and private by saying, “Of course, you don’t have to speak
about private issues. But your personal take on the topic is very valuable.”
o
Make the offer to postpone participant A’s involvement by saying, “In that case, I will
first work with Ms. B and you just come in when you have something to contribute. Is
that alright?”
o
Make an extensive self-explanation with Ms. B (until A wants to engage in the
conversation again), or include A again after some time has passed, “as if nothing
happened”.
Ridiculing the situation/ the moderator
•
A participant in the conflict is making fun of the procedure, the moderator’s role in the procedure,
or another participant.
•
Possible reactions:
o
Accept the critique and take it seriously. Express yourself by saying, “I see what you are
saying./ Oh, so this is how you see it!”
o
“Well, this is my only option of helping you. You can either take it or leave it.”
o
Treating the attack as a wish for clarification: “I am not sure what it is you want to tell me
right now. / I think I still have not fully comprehended your contribution. What is it that you
want to tell me?/ I would like to understand where you are coming from. What is it that you
need me to do?”
The team sketches do not supply relevant information
•
The information is insufficient as database for the solution of the conflict situation.
•
Possible reactions:
o
Take the situation as it is and work with it as well as possible.
51
CONCEPTS & STRATEGIES CONCERNING INTERCULTURAL COMPETENCES
o
After concluding the first phase of the conflict resolution process, the following
questions could be asked: “Do you feel that all that needed to be addressed was
brought up?/ Were we able to resolve everything that needed clarification?/ What
percentage of things to be discussed have we covered so far?”
o
If necessary, begin a second round of the drawing phase.
o
If rejection/ refusal persists, accept the anxieties and utilize other methods (e.g. ‘wishing
wishes’) in order to achieve at least a superficial level of clarification
Crying fit
•
This usually happens when someone does not allow himself/ herself to cry but the crying
becomes more powerful, ending in a crying fit.
•
Possible reactions:
o
Discontinue your work.
o
Address the person by saying, “I am here for you./ Just let it out./ It’s okay.”
o
Put your hand on the person’s arm or give them a hug.
o
Take a break!
Leaving
•
Someone runs out/ leaves the room.
•
Possible reactions:
o
Address the person before s/he leaves, “Stop, before you leave. What is your reason for
leaving?”.
o
Clarify the situation: What is the reason, the attention of the person leaving the room?
Does s/he need anything? When will s/he return?
o
Take a break!
o
Make sure the person is attended to!
Accusing the moderator
•
Someone accuses the moderator of something, e.g. “I am under the impression that you have
no sense of decency. The way you are invading people’s personal space, one just doesn’t do
that.”
52
CONCEPTS & STRATEGIES CONCERNING INTERCULTURAL COMPETENCES
•
Possible reactions:
o
Receive accusations. “Thank you for bringing this to my attention.”
o
Question accusations by figuring out the person’s reason for accusing you.
o
Talk about the situation with the accuser and possibly other people involved.
o
Do not answer from a therapeutic distance, but rather try to work it out on a personal
level.
Threatening
•
Somebody threatens someone else, e.g. by saying, “If this is how this works here (that x is done
in a certain way), then…”
•
Possible reactions:
o
Receive the threat; do not brush it off the table!
o
Take threats very seriously!
o
If possible, ask and work out what is going on here.
o
Clarify if and how the meeting/ discussion can continue.
o
If the situation escalates and requires legal council, consult a lawyer.
o
Should it become necessary, discontinue the discussion and set up a meeting between
the conflict partners and a lawyer.
Violent outbreak
•
Somebody raises their voice/ screams.
•
Possible reactions:
o
Say “Stop!” in a loud voice and determined manner.
o
Ask “What happened?”, or, “What’s going on?”
o
Take the situation as it is and try to work with it, if possible.
o
Should it be necessary, discontinue the discussion and suggest legal council/ assistance.
53
CONCEPTS & STRATEGIES CONCERNING INTERCULTURAL COMPETENCES
Going in circles
•
The discussion/ meeting does not progress, comes to a halt, or returns to the same issue over
and over again.
•
Possible reactions:
o
Accept standstill; do not try to force clarification.
o
Say, “Okay, it won’t become any clearer at this moment. I would like to leave it at that
for now.”
o
Receive the situation and tackle the next topic.
o
If necessary, come back to this point later. Should the discussion end at the same point
again, you can conclude the topic. It is okay to accept that certain aspects cannot not be
solved in a certain setting.
54
CONCEPTS & STRATEGIES CONCERNING INTERCULTURAL COMPETENCES
4. Conclusion
55
CONCEPTS & STRATEGIES CONCERNING INTERCULTURAL COMPETENCES
4. Conclusion
The project COSIMA aims at adapting an instrument for simulating business processes – the Factory In
the Seminar room (FIS) to the needs and situations of younger people and at disseminating it to the
participating partner countries by training trainers in the use of the instruments and the provision of
training material. The FIS simulates team work situations and encourages the participants to reorganize
and optimize the process of production commonly. Thereby, the participants not only learn the analysis
of production processes but also to communicate and interact in reorganizing team work processes.
In a globalized working environment skills in dealing with cultural diversity are a required competence.
So, the teaching of intercultural competences has to be an integral part of an instrument that aims at
teaching the analysis and reorganization of team work processes and that is based on the selfresponsible communication and interaction of the participants.
The module CONCEPTS & STRATEGIES concerning INTERCULTURAL COMPETENCES gives the trainers an
orientation on intercultural competences as well as instruments for solving intercultural conflicts. It
defines intercultural competences as a set of cognitive, affective, and behavioral skills that enables
people to appropriately interact in a variety of cultural contexts. And it presents a three-step-model for
the development of intercultural sensitivity from an ethnocentric worldview over a transition to an
ethno-relative worldview.
Based on a positive understanding of conflicts as productive impulses for the improvement of
interactions between team members the module focuses on the management of intercultural conflicts.
It presents different styles of communication across cultures that could be the origin of
misunderstanding and conflicts and gives an overview on modes of conflict resolution in general.
Especially in the working context different organizational cultures and different leadership styles have a
significant influence on the solution of problems. So, the module also gives an orientation of different
leadership styles and their specific modes of functioning.
Based on this theoretical background the module gives concrete instruments for the moderation of
conflict management to the trainers. These encompass moderation concepts and recommendations for
six steps to conflict resolution: introducing, collecting, selecting, processing, planning and concluding.
56
CONCEPTS & STRATEGIES CONCERNING INTERCULTURAL COMPETENCES
Sources
57
CONCEPTS & STRATEGIES CONCERNING INTERCULTURAL COMPETENCES
Sources
o
Barios, Catarina. „Interkulturelle Mediation in Teams mit multinationaler Belegschaft aus
Deutschland und Lateinamerika.“ In: Interkulturelle Kommunikation: Methoden, Modelle,
Beispiele. Kumbier, Dagmar und Friedemann Schulz von Thun (Hg.) Reinbek bei Hamburg:
Rowohlt Verlag, 2006. pp. 248-310.
o
Beer, Jennifer E. “High and Low Context”. Culture at Work. 21 Sep. 2014. http://www.cultureat-work.com/highlow.html
o
Cherry, Kendra. “Lewin’s Leadership Styles – Three Major Styles of Leadership.”
http://psychology.about.com/od/leadership/a/leadstyles.htm. Last accessed: 14 Oct 2014.
o
Clark, Donald. “Leadership Styles.” http://www.nwlink.com/~donclark/leader/leadstl.html. Last
accessed: 14 Oct. 2014.
o
Earley, P.C. and C.B. Gibson. „Ch. 4: Individual and Group-Level Elements.” In: Multinational
Work Teams. A New Perspective. Routledge: New York, NY. 2008. pp.78-118.
o
Gisevius, Annette, Tom Kehrbaum, Karsten Meier and Frauke Peter. „3. Theorie-Praxis-Dialog.
Aspekte ‚Interkultureller Kompetenz‘. Methoden internationaler Bildungsarbeit im Praxistest.“
IGM Qualitätsentwicklung in der Bildungsarbeit. Bad Orb, 15./16.04.2010.
o
Hofstede, Geert. Culture’s Consequences – Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions and
Organizations Across Nations. Thousand Oaks, London, New Delhi: SAGE. 2001.
o
Interkulturelles Bewusstsein – Ein Handbuch. Bfw-Unternehmen für Bildung: Heidelberg, 2002.
o
Lippmann, Eric. „Konfliktmanagement als Führungsaufgabe.“ In: Handbuch angewandte
Psychologie für Führungskräfte. 2. Auflage. Steiger/ Lippmann (Hgg.). Springer: Berlin, 2003. p.
340.
o
Mayrshofer, Daniela und Hubertus A. Kröger. Prozeßkompetenz in der Projektarbeit. (Reihe
Moderation in der Praxis). Hamburg: Windmühle Verlag, 1999. pp. 81-90, 98-105.
o
Morgan,
Steve
P.
„Leadership
Styles
in
Business
–
The
three
main
types.“
http://www.sooperarticles.com/self-improvement-articles/leadership-articles/leadership-stylesbusiness-3-main-types-594871.html. Last accessed: 14 Oct 2014.
o
Schneider, Susan S. and Jean-Louis Barsoux. „The ‚multicultural’ team.“ In: Managing Across
Cultures, 2nd ed. Financial Times Prentice Hall, 2003. pp. 216-252.
o
Seifert, Joseph W. Moderation und Konfliktklärung. Gabal: Offenbach, 2009.
58
CONCEPTS & STRATEGIES CONCERNING INTERCULTURAL COMPETENCES
o
Ting-Toomey, Stella. “Translating Conflict Face-Negotiation Theory Into Practice.” In: SAGE
Handbook of Intercultural Training. 3rd ed. SAGE Publications: Thousand Oaks, CA. 2004. pp. 217248.
o
Wikipedia contributors. "High- and low-context cultures." Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia.
Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia, 26 Jun. 2014. Web. 21 Sep. 2014.
59