Selling Excess Energy in ERCOT A Presentation for Waste Heat to Power Workshop September 25, 2007 Copyright 2004 Agenda About Fulcrum ERCOT Market Overview Marketing Excess Power Working with a QSE About Fulcrum Energy Management Services Power Generators n Retail Electricity Providers n Large Consumers n Financial Entities About Fulcrum 3,057 MW of power generation under management – Fossil Fueled – 2,702 MW – Renewable – 355 MW Managed more than 1,650 MW of natural gas fired cogeneration facilities at 4 locations in ERCOT FERC licensed power marketer, ERCOT Level 4 QSE, California Scheduling Coordinator, member of PJM, ISO-NE and NYISO Experienced team offering relationship free of conflicts of interest Large Consumer Management Services 24 hour scheduling and dispatch of gas and power Marketing and origination of excess generation capacity Development and assistance in executing a procurement, hedging and risk management plan Evaluation of alternative plant operating parameters to minimize overall cost of power Large Consumer Management Services Valuation analyses for development of onsite cogeneration projects Assistance in establishing a “Self Serve” REP Assistance in valuation, qualification, and marketing of electrical load shedding capacity (“LAAR”) Assistance in mitigating ERCOT TDSP charges ERCOT Market Overview 2007 Report on the Capacity, Demand, and Reserves in the ERCOT Region Summer Summary Load Forecast: Total Summer Peak Demand, MW less LAARs Serving as Responsive Reserve, MW less LAARs Serving as Non-Spinning Reserve, MW less BULs, MW Firm Load Forecast, MW 2007 63,794 1,125 0 0 62,669 2008 65,135 1,125 0 0 64,010 2009 66,508 1,125 0 0 65,383 2010 67,955 1,125 0 0 66,830 2011 69,456 1,125 0 0 68,331 2012 70,733 1,125 0 0 69,608 Resources: Installed Capacity, MW Capacity from Private Networks, MW Effective Load-Carrying Capability (ELCC) of Wind Generation, MW RMR Units under Contract, MW Operational Generation, MW 2007 61,424 6,513 298 169 68,404 2008 61,424 6,217 298 169 68,108 2009 61,424 6,217 298 169 68,108 2010 61,424 6,217 298 169 68,108 2011 61,424 6,217 298 0 67,939 2012 61,424 6,217 298 0 67,939 50% of Non-Synchronous Ties, MW Switchable Units, MW Available Mothballed Generation , MW Planned Units (not wind) with Signed IA and Air Permit, MW ELCC of Planned Wind Units with Signed IA, MW Total Resources, MW 553 2,848 165 0 0 71,970 553 2,848 510 550 171 72,740 553 2,848 419 550 174 72,652 553 2,848 594 550 174 72,827 553 2,848 558 1,300 174 73,372 553 2,848 522 2,100 174 74,136 less Switchable Units Unavailable to ERCOT, MW less Retiring Units, MW Resources, MW 158 0 71,812 317 375 72,048 317 375 71,960 0 433 72,394 0 433 72,939 0 433 73,703 Reserve Margin (Resources - Firm Load Forecast)/Firm Load Forecast 14.6% 12.6% 10.1% 8.3% 6.7% 5.9% Summer 2007 Fuel Types - ERCOT 6.4% 0.3% 0.7% 20.5% 0.4% 71.7% Natural Gas Wind Coal Water Other Nuclear ERCOT Operations ERCOT ISO acts as single control area operator to ensure reliability All schedules flow and ERCOT manages congestion through the balancing energy market Zonal market today – Inter-zonal congestion is directly assigned – Intra-zonal congestion is uplifted to Load Serving Entities on the basis of Load Ratio Share Transmission Congestion Rights can be purchased to manage congestion risk ERCOT Operations ERCOT also manages load and generator imbalances with the balancing energy market and ancillary services The Balancing Energy market accounts for less than 5% of the overall market ERCOT runs a daily auction for Ancillary Services (Regulation Up/Down, Responsive Reserves, Non Spinning Reserves, Replacement Reserves) Marketing Excess Power Bilateral Trading • • • • EEI Master Purchase and Sales Agreements Market trades by Zone or ERCOT Seller’s Choice On peak 5 x 16 HE 0700 thru HE 22 Off peak 7 x 8 HE 23 and HE 24 plus HE 0100 thru 0600 How the Bilateral Market Works Electricity sellers Resources Electricity buyers Bilateral transactions QSEs Qualified Scheduling Entity Load Serving Entities Bilateral transactions QSEs Marketing Excess Power in ERCOT Post deregulation in ERCOT, QF has a viable market in which to market its power and there are no special PURPA put rights Excess power can be marketed in: – Bilateral market to any Power Marketer or Load Serving Entity (majority of trading occurs in bilateral market) – ERCOT real time Balancing Energy market – Ancillary services market In the bilateral market, power is typically sold on a firm basis with liquidated damages for non-performance (“Firm LD”) Long term structured contracts typically include a capacity and energy component Forward Market Prices ERCOT Houston 9/24/2007 Henry Hub Jan-08 Feb-08 Mar-08 Apr-08 May-08 Jun-08 Jul-08 Aug-08 Sep-08 Oct-08 Nov-08 Dec-08 AVG 2008 AVG 2009 AVG 2010 AVG 2011 AVG 2012 8.18 8.20 8.01 7.61 7.63 7.70 7.78 7.84 7.86 7.95 8.37 8.79 7.99 8.32 8.13 7.88 7.63 5x16 62.98 62.73 67.48 66.88 69.98 78.55 92.04 92.78 78.53 70.34 65.61 62.57 72.54 72.61 74.62 71.98 70.23 5x16 Heat Rate 7.69 7.65 8.42 8.79 9.18 10.21 11.84 11.83 9.99 8.85 7.84 7.12 9.08 8.73 9.25 9.21 9.27 2x16 58.12 57.89 62.30 61.77 62.56 68.69 76.97 82.94 72.57 65.03 60.60 57.97 65.62 65.70 67.52 65.15 63.57 2x16 Heat Rate 7.10 7.06 7.78 8.12 8.20 8.93 9.90 10.58 9.23 8.19 7.24 6.59 8.21 7.90 8.36 8.33 8.38 7x8 50.72 50.78 48.59 48.95 46.82 47.24 56.56 52.68 49.24 45.93 48.05 51.21 49.73 47.82 43.69 52.50 50.76 7x8 Heat Rate 6.20 6.20 6.07 6.44 6.14 6.14 7.28 6.72 6.26 5.78 5.74 5.83 6.22 5.75 5.38 6.68 6.66 Wrap 53.15 53.22 53.67 53.32 52.69 54.95 63.03 64.29 56.92 52.01 52.97 52.91 55.26 54.18 52.20 56.93 55.26 Wrap Heat Rate 6.49 6.49 6.70 7.01 6.91 7.14 8.11 8.20 7.24 6.55 6.33 6.02 6.92 6.51 6.44 7.25 7.27 7x24 58.01 57.81 59.91 59.95 60.87 65.96 77.38 77.16 67.49 61.08 58.59 57.69 63.49 62.96 62.89 64.09 62.38 7x24 Heat Rate 7.09 7.05 7.48 7.88 7.98 8.57 9.95 9.84 8.58 7.69 7.00 6.56 7.94 7.57 7.78 8.18 8.22 ERCOT BALANCING MARKET The marginal clearing price of balancing energy (“MCPE) is set every 15 minutes Last offer cleared establishes MCPE for an interval MCPE is capped at $1,500 today and transitioning to $3,000 with nodal Year 2004 2004 2004 2004 2004 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2006 2006 2006 2006 2006 2007 YTD 2007 YTD 2007 YTD 2007 YTD Zone North South West Houston Northeast North South West Houston Northeast North South West Houston Northeast Houston North South West $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 5x16 47.63 46.62 46.87 47.91 46.75 74.49 69.65 74.38 75.99 73.41 57.46 55.75 57.40 58.20 56.79 62.71 61.01 61.57 60.67 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 2x16 43.95 42.84 43.88 43.72 43.93 63.84 60.29 63.35 64.04 63.14 54.10 52.88 53.94 54.87 52.94 56.55 55.55 55.45 55.71 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 7x8 33.59 32.86 33.33 33.31 33.16 48.19 48.05 48.73 48.45 48.19 41.33 40.51 41.27 41.63 41.00 42.74 42.33 42.57 43.34 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 7x24 42.25 41.32 41.79 42.25 41.68 63.67 60.63 63.69 64.49 63.02 51.44 50.12 51.36 52.04 50.79 54.82 53.69 54.01 53.90 Factors to Consider in Short Term Sales Ability to commit to a Day Ahead schedule Impact of steam requirements on ability to control to a specific output level Natural gas cost, including imbalance costs/constraints True costs of any waste fuels that are burned in lieu of gas Marginal cost to produce power, including O&M, taking into account any steam revenues or cost of alternate steam supply from a boiler Factors to Consider in Short Term Sales Opportunity to reduce production of product(s) to sell more power or interrupt load to provide Responsive Reserves Day Ahead prices vs. Balancing Energy prices Ability to offer intra-day flexibility through Ancillary Services or short schedules Emissions limits Factors to Consider in Long Term Sales Term Price Structure Forward Price Curve for Natural Gas and Power Hedging Strategies Delivery Point Firm LD vs. Unit Contingent Steam Requirements Dispatch ability / flexibility to ramp up/down Ancillary Services Capacity Factors to Consider in Long Term Sales Fuel Supply Costs Operating Costs Forced Outage Rates Planned Maintenance Credit Requirements Counterparty Default Risk Financing Requirements Emissions limits Working with a QSE Beginning Steps in ERCOT For projects >10 MW – Request interconnection study from ERCOT – ERCOT Study Fees $15 to $30K, depending upon size of the capacity – Interconnection agreement with TDSP – Process typically takes 90 to 270 days Registration as Power Generating Company with ERCOT Registration with PUC on or before the date power is first generated – See Section 25.109 of PUC Regulations Negotiation of QSE agreement, submit QSE paperwork to ERCOT Installation of telemetry, AGC and ERCOT meter QSE Operations 24 hour operations, 365 days, similar to control area system operations All load and resources must be represented by a QSE Only entity allowed to financially transact with ERCOT Submits energy schedules by zone, balanced between obligations (retail load or bilateral trades) and supply resources SCADA & telemetry required to continuously monitor generation and to respond to dispatch instructions QSE Operations Submits offers to sell balancing energy and ancillary services to ERCOT Submits mandatory Balancing Down bids to ERCOT Schedules awarded Ancillary Services, including LAAR Submits power generation Resource Plans to ERCOT Responds to dispatch instructions from ERCOT QSE performance is monitored through measurement of Schedule Control Error calculation Additional Services to Consider Assistance in optimizing cogen plant operations and market opportunities Valuation analysis for cogen development Assistance in hedging gas and power Assistance in structuring flexible fuel and long term power sales contracts Assistance in negotiation of REP contract Assistance in establishing Self Serve REP Assistance in qualifying and monetizing LAAR capacity Contact Information Kim Casey Executive Vice President Fulcrum Power Services L.P. 5120 Woodway Dr., Suite 10010 Houston, TX 77056 Office: 713-297-4523 Email: [email protected] www.fulcrumpower.com
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz