Pakistan - Power Transmission Enhancement Program
MFF Tranche 2
Subproject No. 5
New D.G. Khan 500kV Sub-Station and Transmission Line
National Transmission and Dispatch Company (NTDC)
GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN
November 2007
DGkhan_LARP_FINAL_301107_JEAN
Power Transmission Enhancement Program
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Abbreviations ......................................................................................................................iv
Definition of Terms...............................................................................................................v
Executive Summary .............................................................................................................vi
1.
INTRODUCTION ..........................................................................................1
1.1
Background...................................................................................................1
1.2
Description of the Subproject ........................................................................1
2.
PROJECT COMPENSATION AND REHABILITATION FRAMEWORK .......4
2.1
Pakistan’s Law and Regulations on Land Acquisition and Resettlement .......4
2.2
ADB’s Involuntary Resettlement Policy .........................................................5
2.3
Comparison of Pakistan Land Acquisition Act and ADB Resettlement Policy 5
2.4
Remedial Measures to Bridge the Gap..........................................................6
2.5
Legislation Relevant to Land Classification ...................................................6
2.6
Compensation Eligibility and Entitlements for the Project ..............................6
2.7
Eligibility........................................................................................................8
2.8
Compensation Entitlements ..........................................................................8
2.9
Assessment of Compensation Unit Values....................................................10
3.
IMPACTS ASSESSMENT ............................................................................12
3.1
Minimization of Impacts.................................................................................12
3.2
Resettlement Surveys ...................................................................................12
3.3
Impacts of Substation....................................................................................12
3.4
Impacts of Transmission Line........................................................................13
3.5
Affected Households .....................................................................................18
3.6
Impacts on Public Land and Infrastructure ....................................................19
4.
SOCIO-ECONOMIC PROFILE OF AFFECTED PEOPLE ............................21
4.1
Census of Affected Households ....................................................................21
4.2
Data on Heads of Affected Households.........................................................22
4.3
Data on Affected Households and Population ...............................................22
5.
INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENTS............................................................25
5.1
National Transmission and Dispatch Company .............................................25
5.2
District Government ......................................................................................26
5.3
Other Agencies and Institutions.....................................................................27
5.4
Responsibility for Internal and External Monitoring........................................28
LARP D.G. Khan 500kV Subproject – Final Draft November 2007
Page i
Power Transmission Enhancement Program
6.
CONSULTATION AND DISCLOSURE.........................................................29
6.1
Consultation Undertaken for the LARP..........................................................29
6.2
Compensation Options Discussed ................................................................30
6.3
LARP Disclosure...........................................................................................31
7.
GRIEVANCE REDRESS PROCESS ............................................................32
8.
BUDGET FOR LAND AND ASSET ACQUISITION ......................................33
8.1
Basis for Compensation ................................................................................33
8.2
Determining the Rate of Land for Sub-Station ...............................................33
8.3
Determining the Rates for Compensation......................................................33
8.4
Budget for Land and Asset Acquisition..........................................................36
9.
IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE .................................................................38
10.
MONITORING AND EVALUATION ..............................................................40
10.1
Internal Monitoring ........................................................................................40
10.2
External Monitoring .......................................................................................41
10.3
Indicators for Monitoring and Evaluation .......................................................41
10.4
Resettlement Databank.................................................................................41
10.5
Reporting Requirements ...............................................................................42
APPENDICES
Appendix 1:
Working Tables .............................................................................................44
Appendix 2:
List of Participants in Consultation Sessions .................................................Error! Bookmark no
Appendix 3:
Draft Public Information Brochure .................................................................52
Appendix 4:
Terms of Reference for External Monitoring (Consultant/NGO).....................59
FIGURES
Figure 1.1:
Aerial View of Location of D.G. Khan 500kV Sub-Station ..............................2
Figure 3.1
Photograph Showing Clearance Under 500kV Tower ...................................13
Figure 5.1:
LAR Organogram and Actions.......................................................................26
Figure 5.2:
Organization of District Land Acquisition Collector Office ..............................26
Figure 5.3:
Organization of Land Acquisition Steering Committee...................................27
Figure 5.4:
Organization of Land Acquisition Coordination Committee............................28
TABLES
Table 2.1:
Pakistan and ADB Land Acquisition Policies .................................................5
Table 2.2:
Compensation Eligibility and Entitlements Matrix ..........................................7
Table 3.1:
Types of Land Traversed Over by Transmission Line ...................................13
Table 3.2:
Resettlement Impacts of Towers on Private Farmlands ................................15
Table 3.3:
Distribution of TL Corridor* by Type of Land..................................................16
LARP D.G. Khan 500kV Subproject – Final Draft November 2007
Page ii
Power Transmission Enhancement Program
Table 3.4:
Resettlement Impacts of TL Corridor* Private Farmlands..............................16
Table 3.5:
Area of Land Temporarily Affected Type of Line and Village .........................16
Table 3.6:
Total Area of Affected Crops by Type of Land...............................................17
Table 3.7:
Affected Fruit and Wood Trees by Type of Line ............................................Error! Bookmark no
Table 3.8:
Percentage of Crop Loss by Affected Households ........................................Error! Bookmark
Table 3.9:
Affected Households by Towers and TL Corridor ..........................................18
Table 3.10:
Location and Number of Affected Households ..............................................19
Table 3.11:
Public Land & Infrastructure Traversed by 500 kV Transmission Line...........20
Table 4.1:
Affected Households and Population by Affected Village ..............................21
Table 4.2:
Average Size Affected Households ...............................................................22
Table 4.3:
Gender Composition of Affected Households................................................22
Table 4.4:
Age and Gender Composition of AHs ...........................................................23
Table 4.5:
Farm Size of Affected Households ................................................................23
Table 4.6:
Involvement of AHs by Gender in Income Sectors ........................................23
Table 4.7:
Sector-Wise Average Incomes by Gender of Affected Households ...............24
Table 4.8:
Monthly per Capita Income of Affected Households ......................................24
Table 4.9:
Literacy Rate of AHs by Gender of Persons .................................................24
Table 6.1:
Participants in Group Discussions and Consultations....................................29
Table 7.1:
Grievance Resolution Process ......................................................................32
Table 8.1:
Average Crop Income in D. G. Khan Subproject Area...................................34
Table 8.2:
Compensation for Trees Affected .................................................................Error! Bookmark no
Table 8.3:
Estimated Resettlement Cost........................................................................37
Table 9.1:
Implementation Schedule..............................................................................39
LARP D.G. Khan 500kV Subproject – Final Draft November 2007
Page iii
Power Transmission Enhancement Program
Abbreviations
ADB
Asian Development Bank
AH
Affected household
AP
Affected Person
CBC
Citizen Community Board
CBO
Community Based Organization
RFS
Resettlement Field Surveys
D.G. Khan
Dera Ghazi Khan (a south-western district of Punjab Province in Pakistan)
DOR
District Officer Revenues
EHV
Extra-High Voltage (Division of NTDC)
EMA
External Monitoring Agency
GRC
Grievance Redress Committee
GSC
Grid System Construction (department of EHV/NTDC)
GSO
Sub-Station Operation (department of EHV/NTDC)
IMO
Independent monitoring organization
IPDF
Indigenous Peoples Development Framework
IPDP
Indigenous Peoples Development Plan
kanal
unit of land measurement: 1 kanal = 20 marlas (8 kanal = 1 acre)
kV
kilo-Volt
LAA
Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (amended)
LAC
Land Acquisition Collector
LARF
Land Acquisition and Resettlement Framework
LARP
Land Acquisition and Resettlement Plan
LARU
Land Acquisition and Resettlement Unit (NTDC)
marla
smallest unit of land measurement: 1 marla = 272.25 ft2 (= 25.31 m2)
MOWP
Ministry of Power and Water
MRM
Management Review Meeting
NGO
Non-governmental organization
NTDC
National Transmission and Dispatch Company
PMU
Project Management Unit
PPTA
Project Preparatory Technical Assistance
RFS
Resettlement filed survey
ROW
Right-of-Way
Rs.
Pakistani rupees (currency): Rs. 60.90 = US$1.00
TOR
Terms of Reference
WAPDA
Water and Power Development Authority (Pakistan)
LARP D.G. Khan 500kV Subproject – Final Draft November 2007
Page iv
Power Transmission Enhancement Program
Definition of Terms
Affected Persons (APs)
mean all the people affected by the project through land acquisition,
relocation, or loss of incomes and includes any person, household
(sometimes referred to as project affected family or affected household
[AH]), firms, or public or private institutions. AHs/APs therefore include; i)
persons affected directly by the safety corridor, right-of-way, tower or pole
foundations or construction work area; (ii) persons whose agricultural land
or other productive assets such as trees or crops are affected; (iii)
persons whose businesses are affected and who might experience loss of
income due to the project impact; (iv) persons who lose work/employment
as a result of project impact; and (v) people who lose access to
community resources/property as a result of the project.
Compensation
means payment in cash or kind for an asset to be acquired or affected by
a project at replacement cost at current market value.
Cut-off-date
means the date after which people will NOT be considered eligible for
compensation i.e. they are not included in the list of AHs as defined by the
census. Normally, the cut-off date is the date of the resettlement surveys.
Encroachers
mean those people who move into the project area after the cut-off date
and are therefore not eligible for compensation or other rehabilitation
measures provided by the project.
Entitlement
means the range of measures comprising cash or kind compensation,
relocation cost, income rehabilitation assistance, transfer assistance,
income substitution, and relocation which are due to /business restoration
which are due to AHs, depending on the type and degree nature of their
losses, to restore their social and economic base.
Land acquisition
means the process whereby a person is compelled by a public agency to
alienate all or part of the land s/he owns or possesses, to the ownership
and possession of that agency, for public purposes, in return for fair
compensation. The land acquisition and resettlement plan is known as
LARP.
Non-titled
means those who have no recognizable rights or claims to the land that
they are occupying and includes people using private or state land without
permission, permit or grant i.e. those people without legal title to land
and/or structures occupied or used by them. ADB’s policy explicitly states
that such people cannot be denied compensation.
Poor
means those falling below the official national poverty line (equivalent to
2,350 calories per day) of Rs 848.79 per person per month (2004).
Replacement cost
means the method of valuing assets to replace the loss at current market
value, or its nearest equivalent, and is the amount of cash or kind needed
to replace an asset in its existing condition, without deduction of
transaction costs or for any material salvaged.
Resettlement Field Surveys
means the detailed inventory of losses that is completed after detailed
design and marking of project boundaries on the ground and includes
socioeconomic data on the affected households/families, and stakeholder
consultations.
Sharecropper
means the same as tenant cultivator or tenant farmer, and is a person
who cultivates land they do not own for an agreed proportion of the crop
or harvest.
Significant impact
means 200 people or more will experience major impacts, which are
defined as; (i) being physically displaced from housing, or (ii) losing ten
per cent or more of their productive assets (income generating).
Vulnerable people
means any people who might suffer disproportionately or face the risk of
being marginalized from the effects of resettlement and includes; (i)
female-headed households with dependents; (ii) disabled household
heads; (iii) poor households (within the meaning given previously); (iv)
landless; (v) elderly households with no means of support; (vi) households
without security of tenure; (vii) ethnic minorities; and (viii) marginal
farmers (with landholdings of five acres or less).
LARP D.G. Khan 500kV Subproject – Final Draft November 2007
Page v
Power Transmission Enhancement Program
Executive Summary
1.
The Subproject. The Dera Ghazi Khan subproject to be implemented under
Tranche 2 of the Power Transmission Enhancement Program includes the
construction of a new 500 kV Sub-Station in Dera Ghazi Khan District
(Punjab) and 21.4 km of 500 kV transmission line (TL) passing through the
Aaliwala, Paigan and Gadai villages in the D.G. Khan district. The SubStation will be constructed on a part of an unused provincial government land
located 11 km from Dera Ghazi Khan town on Sakhi Sarwar Road. No
impacts will occur on this component. The TL component will involve the
construction of 67 towers, of which 60 will be located on private land, and 7
on government land; no permanent land acquisition will be necessary for this
component as the impacts will be limited to the loss of crops and trees. The
resettlement survey undertaken on the proposed 50m wide corridor of the TL
identified a total of 64 affected households (AHs) with a total population of
805 persons (AHs) who will experience the loss of agricultural crops (wheat in
winter and/or cotton in summer) and some 542 trees (122 fruit and 420 wood
trees). In accordance with these impacts i.e. minor magnitude only, a Short
Land Acquisition & Resettlement Plan (LARP) has been prepared for this
subproject. Compensation and rehabilitation for the subproject impacts will be
provided in accordance to the following Compensation Eligibility and
Entitlements Matrix.
Table 1: Compensation Eligibility and Entitlements Matrix
Farmer/Titleholder
Arable Land
Access is not
restricted and
existing or current
land use will remain
unchanged
Leaseholder
(registered or not)
Sharecroppers
(registered or not)
Agricultural
workers
Squatters
Farmer/Titleholder
Arable Land
All adverse effects
on land use
independent of
severity of impact
Leaseholder
(registered or not)
Sharecroppers
(registered or not)
Agricultural
workers
Squatters
LARP D.G. Khan 500kV Subproject – Final Draft November 2007
No Land compensation provided that land is
rehabilitated/restored to former quality following
completion of works. Compensation, in cash, for all
damaged crops and trees as per item below
No Land compensation provided that the land is
rehabilitated/restored to former quality following
completion of works. Compensation, in cash, for all
damaged crops and trees as per item below
Compensation, in cash or kind, for all damaged
crops/trees as per item below
Compensation, in cash or kind, for all damaged
crops/trees as per item below
Compensation, in cash or kind, for all damaged
crops/trees as per item below
Land for land compensation with plots of equal
value and productivity to the plots lost; or cash for
affected land at replacement cost based on market
value a plus 15% compulsory acquisition
surcharge and free of taxes, registration, and
transfer costs
Renewal
of
lease
in
plots
of
equal
value/productivity of plots lost, or Cash equivalent
to market value of gross yield of affected land for
the remaining lease years (up to a maximum of 3
years).
Cash compensation equal to market value of lost
harvest share once (temporary impact) or twice
(permanent impact)
Cash indemnity equal to salary (including portions
in kind) for remaining part of agricultural year.
1 rehabilitation allowance equal to market value of
1 gross harvest (additional to crop compensation)
for land use loss.
Page vi
Power Transmission Enhancement Program
Asset
Specification
Affected People
Farmer/Titleholder
Leaseholder
Additional for
severe impacts
(>10% of land loss)
Arable Land
Sharecroppers
(registered or not)
Squatters
Titleholder
Residential/
Commercial
Land
Renter/Leaseholder
Squatters
All relevant APs
(including
squatters)
Houses and
Structures
All APs (also
squatters)
Crops
Crops affected
Trees
Trees affected
Business
Employment
Loss of business or
employment
Relocation
Transport,
transition costs
All APs also
squatters)
All APs (including
squatters)
All APs so affected
Community
Vulnerable AP
AP below poverty
line
Compensation Entitlements
1 severe impact allowance equal to market value
of gross harvest of affected land for 1 year
(inclusive of winter and summer crop and
additional to standard crop compensation)
1 severe impact allowance equal to market value
of harvest share (additional to standard crop
compensation)
1 severe impact allowance equal to market value
of gross harvest of the affected land for 1 year
(inclusive of winter and summer crop and
additional to standard crop compensation)
Land x land through provision of plots comparable
in value/location to plot lost; or cash for affected
land at full replacement cost free of taxes,
registration, transfer costs plus 15% compulsory
acquisition surcharge.
1-3 months allowance
Accommodation in a government resettlement
area or a self-relocation allowance
Cash compensation at replacement rate for
affected structure/other fixed assets free of
salvaged materials, depreciation or transaction
costs. For partial impacts full cash assistance to
restore remaining structure.
Crop compensation in cash at full market rate for
one harvest (either winter or summer) by default
for impacts caused by tower bases and perimeter,
stringing and access.
All other crop losses will be compensated at
market rates based on actual losses.
Cash
compensation
shall
reflect income
replacement
Business owner: (i) Cash compensation equal to 1
year income, if loss permanent; (ii) cash
compensation for the period of business
interruption, if loss is temporary.
Worker/employee: lost wages indemnity for the
business interruption period up to a 3 months
maximum.
Provision of sufficient allowance to cover transport
expenses and livelihood expenses for one month.
Rehabilitation/substitution
of
affected
structures/utilities (i.e. mosques, roads, schools
etc.
Employment priority in project-related jobs.
2.
Significance of Impact. As there is no restriction on access to, or use of,
land, there will be no permanent loss of land. No houses or shops nor any
community structures will be affected. Therefore there are no AHs that will
experience significant impacts.
3.
Indigenous People Issues. All AHs are Muslim and ethnically Siraiki. There
are neither tribal nor minority people amongst the 64 AHs. The ADB’s Policy
on Indigenous People, as specified in the Indigenous Peoples Development
Framework (IPDF) prepared for the program is not triggered, and therefore
neither an IPDP nor special action is required for this subproject.
LARP D.G. Khan 500kV Subproject – Final Draft November 2007
Page vii
Power Transmission Enhancement Program
4.
Participatory Land Acquisition Process. The program’s LARF has been
translated into Urdu and disclosed according to ADB’s public communications
policy, it has also been uploaded to ADB’s website. For the preparation of
this LARP, consultation has been undertaken, on behalf of NTDC, through a
series of meetings with local government agencies, AHs, as well as wider
community group meetings of both men and women.
There was a
participatory process, with the head of household assisting in the identification
and calculation of losses. Further consultation will be required during the
implementation of the LARP.
5.
Grievance Mechanism. There is also a process established to deal with any
issues or concerns raised on any aspect of the LARP or compensation
process. The verbal or written grievances of AHs will be heard by the district
level Land Acquisition Coordinating Committees (LACCs), which will be
established to assist NTDC implement the LARP.
6.
Cost of Plan. The budget has been established using the rates derived
through consultation. The costs for compensation for the 64 AHs and external
monitoring (including the administration charge of 10 per cent and a
contingency of 10 per cent) are Rs. 80.31 million (US$ 1.32 million). This is
inclusive of the cost of 41 ha of land to be purchased for the Sub-Station from
the Forest Department, Government of Punjab.
Table 2: Cost of D. G. Khan LARP
!
&
"
#$
%
$
'
%
$
)
*
+
,
)
+
- ,
)
+
,
) '
/0
)
&
+ ,
,
1
,
!
( (
(
,#
1
% (
'
!
,
,#
.
'
.
'
'
,
#
,
5 ! 4 #
,
)
6 7" 8
('%
1
2 &3
%
(( ' %
$
! 4
3
' (
(
."
"
%
* +
'
(
'
!
!
!
" # $% # & $' # (
!
!
!
, $% , " $- & "
9 +
LARP D.G. Khan 500kV Subproject – Final Draft November 2007
(
Page viii
Power Transmission Enhancement Program
1.
INTRODUCTION
1.1
Background
1.
The Government of Pakistan (the Government) has requested (since approved and
loan agreement signed in January 2007) financing from Asian Development Bank
(ADB) for implementing the Power Transmission Enhancement Investment Program
(the program) to be executed through a Multi-tranche Financial Facility (MFF)
divided into four tranches and with the Ministry of Water and Power and the National
Transmission and Dispatch Company (NTDC) as the Executing Agency (EA) and
the Implementing Agency (IA) respectively. Each tranche will constitute a project
which, in turn, will be divided into several subprojects involving the
construction/upgrading of transmission lines and construction of sub-stations where
required.
2.
This Short Land Acquisition and Resettlement Plan (LARP) for New D. G. Khan
500kV Sub-Station and Transmission Lines Subproject (the Subproject), one of the
subprojects under tranche 2 of the MFF program, has been prepared by NTDC to
comply with the Land Acquisition and Resettlement Framework (LARF) prepared for
the program as a whole. As such the Subproject will have to fit the following LARrelated implementation conditions:
•
Signing of contracts awards for the Subproject’s civil works will be contingent
to the preparation of a LARP fitting the LARF and ADB relevant polices1;
•
ADB issuance of notice to proceed for the implementation of the subproject’s
civil works will be contingent to the full implementation of the compensation
and rehabilitation programs detailed in this LARP.
3.
This LARP is based on final line alignments/tower positions and fully fits the
provisions of the LARF already prepared. As required by the LAR-related
conditionalities for the program the LARF has been reviewed but it was not modified
as the subprojects under tranche 2 require the same LAR approach as the projects
under tranche 1.
4.
As noted in the LARF and based on OM section F2/OP & BP (2003) when impacts
are considered significant i.e. >200 AHs resettled or suffering >10% income losses,
a subproject is classified as category “A” and a full LARP is to be prepared.
Conversely, when losses are minor or no significant [<200 AH resettled or suffering
<10% income losses], a subproject is classified as category “B” and only a short
LARP is to be prepared. Due to the number of people affected (64 AHs/805 AHs)
and impact magnitude (minor only), this document has been prepared following the
short LARP format.
1.2
Description of the Subproject
5.
The subproject will be located 11 km from D. G. Khan town on Sakhi Sarwar Road,
as shown on Figure 1.1. The subproject will involve the installation of one 500kV
outdoor substation that will be known as “New D. G. Khan 500 kV Substation”. The
new sub station will include 2 x 600MVa 500/220 kV power transformers, 2 x 250
MVA 220/132 kV power transformers, and allied equipment. The sub station will be
interconnected by means of a 21.4 km 500 kV line to the existing 500 kV Guddu to
Multan TL, including 18 km of double circuit section and two single circuit sections to
connect to the proposed substation and to the existing 500 kV transmission line.
1
ADB’s Policy on Involuntary Resettlement (1995) and Operations Manual (OM) Section F2/OP & BP (2003).
LARP D.G. Khan 500kV Subproject – Final Draft November 2007
Page 1
Power Transmission Enhancement Program
Figure 1.1: Aerial View of Location of D.G. Khan 500kV Sub-Station
6.
Dera Ghazi Khan and its neighboring towns form a load centre with rapidly growing
demand for electrical energy. This area lies between Muzafergarh and northern
Loralai and Barkhan Districts of Baluchistan province, with its electricity supply is
managed by Multan Electric Power Company (MEPCO) whose average annual load
growth is about 8%. The electricity load from Dera Ghazi Khan and neighboring area
is supplied through a 132 kV sub-transmission network.
7.
The load flow studies and technical analysis show that without the construction of
the proposed 500 kV sub-station and associated TL, the stability of the Baluchistan
system cannot be ensured , the proposed 220 kV TL from the new 500 kV D. G.
Khan will provide alternative supply to northern Baluchistan and averts the possibility
of voltage collapse. Therefore the proposed subproject will ensure the stability of the
Baluchistan system and also provide support to the 220/132 kV network of MEPCO.
8.
The new 500kV substation will be constructed on 41 ha of unused land currently
owned by the provincial government of Punjab. The site is located 11 km from D. G.
Khan town towards the west on Sakhi Sarwar Road, leading to Quetta via Fort
Monroe. At the start of the new TL, there will be two single circuit lines of a total
LARP D.G. Khan 500kV Subproject – Final Draft November 2007
Page 2
Power Transmission Enhancement Program
length of 3.37 km to connecting in and out of the parent 500kV Guddu – Multan line
passing by Aaliwala village towards south of D. G. Khan town. There will also be a
21.4 km double and single circuit transmission line to connect to the New D. G.
Khan 500 kV Sub-Station. These lines will be supported by a total 67 towers. The
TLs traverse an entirely agro-rural area and will not require any permanent land
acquisition, instead farmers will be compensated for lost crops and trees caused by
the construction of towers and stringing of the TL.
9.
The estimated total cost of the planned works under the Subproject is Rs. 3.804
billion or $62.46 million. The total land acquisition and resettlement cost of this
subproject is estimated at Rs. 80.31 million or US$1.32 million (2.1% of the total
Subproject cost).
LARP D.G. Khan 500kV Subproject – Final Draft November 2007
Page 3
Power Transmission Enhancement Program
2.
PROJECT
COMPENSATION
FRAMEWORK
10.
This section compares the Pakistani laws and regulations on land acquisition and
resettlement with the requirements of the ADB Policy on Involuntary Resettlement
and summarizes the main components of the policy framework prepared specifically
for the Project to ensure that ADB’s policy on involuntary resettlement is complied
with (refer to Section 2.4).
2.1
Pakistan’s Law and Regulations on Land Acquisition and Resettlement
11.
The 1894 Land Acquisition Act (LAA) with its successive amendments is the main
law regulating land acquisition for public purpose. The LAA has been variously
interpreted by local governments, and some province has augmented the LAA by
issuing provincial legislations. The LAA and its Implementation Rules require that
following an impacts assessment/valuation effort, land and crops are compensated
in cash at market rate to titled landowners and registered land tenants/users,
respectively. The LAA mandates that land valuation is to be based on the latest 5-3
years average registered land sale rates, though, in several recent cases the
median rate over the past year, or even the current rates, have been applied. Due to
widespread land under-valuation by the Revenue Department, current market rates
are now frequently used with an added 15 per cent Compulsory Acquisition
Surcharge as provided in the LAA.
12.
Based on the LAA, only legal owners and tenants registered with the Land Revenue
Department or possessing formal lease agreements, are eligible for compensation
or livelihood support. The rights of the non-titled, are however addressed under the
1986 Punjab Jinnah Abadis for Non-proprietors in Rural Areas Act which recognize
to squatters the right to receive rehabilitation in form of a replacement plot. It is to be
noted that this right has been sometimes extended in practice to include some form
of rehabilitation in cash or in forms different from land. Projects such as Chotiari
Dam, Ghazi Barotha Hydropower, and National Highways Improvement, have
awarded compensation and assistance to unregistered tenants and other forms of
AHs (sharecroppers/squatters).
13.
It is also noted that the LAA does not automatically mandate for specific
rehabilitation/assistance provisions benefiting the poor, vulnerable groups, or
severely affected AHs, nor it automatically provides for rehabilitation of
income/livelihood losses or resettlement costs. This however it is often done in many
projects in form of ad hoc arrangements based on negotiations between a specific
EA and the AHs.
14.
As noted above, exceptions to the rule are intrinsic to the fact that the law is elastic
and is broadly interpreted at provincial level depending on operational requirements,
local needs, and socio-economic circumstances. Recourse is often taken to ad hoc
arrangements, agreements and understandings for resettlement in difficult
situations. The above is also influenced by the fact that an amendment of the LAA
has been considered necessary by the Ministry of Environment. Accordingly, a
National Resettlement Policy (NRP) and a Resettlement Ordinance have been
drafted to broaden LAA provisions and current practices so as to widen the scope of
eligibility and tightening up loopholes (i.e. regarding definitions of malpractices, cutoff dates, political influence on routing, etc.). But both these documents are still
awaiting government’s approval for implementation.
LARP D.G. Khan 500kV Subproject – Final Draft November 2007
AND
REHABILITATION
Page 4
Power Transmission Enhancement Program
2.2
ADB’s Involuntary Resettlement Policy
15.
The ADB Policy on Involuntary Resettlement is based on the following principles:
•
Involuntary resettlement is to be avoided or at least minimized.
•
Compensation must ensure maintenance of AHs’ pre-project living standards.
•
Compensation is required for any AH who as a result of a project has their
access to, or use of, land restricted.
•
AHs should be fully informed and consulted on LAR compensation options.
•
AHs’ socio-cultural institutions will be supported/used as much as possible.
•
Compensation will be carried out with equal consideration of gender.
•
Lack of formal legal land title should not be a hindrance to rehabilitation.
•
Particular attention should be paid to households headed by women and
other vulnerable groups, such as indigenous people and ethnic minorities,
and appropriate assistance will be provided to help them improve their status.
•
LAR should be conceived and executed as a part of the project, and the full
costs of compensation should be included in project costs and benefits.
•
Compensation/rehabilitation assistance will be paid prior to ground leveling
and demolition of the affected structures.
2.3
Comparison of Pakistan Land Acquisition Act and ADB Resettlement Policy
16.
The following Table 2.1 outlines differences between the Pakistani Law and ADB
Resettlement Policy:
Table 2.1: Pakistan and ADB Land Acquisition Policies
Pakistan’s Land Acquisition Act
ADB Involuntary Resettlement Policy
Land compensation only for titled landowners or
holders of customary rights.
Lack of title should not be a bar to compensation and/or
rehabilitation. Non-title-holders are to be rehabilitated.
Crop losses compensation provided only to registered
landowners and lease/sharecrop tenants (Nonregistered are often deprived).
Crop compensation are provided to landowners and
sharecrop/lease tenants according to their shares
whether they are registered or not
Tree losses are compensated o the basis of officially
fixed rates by the Forest and Horticulture
departments
Tree losses are compensated according to actual worth
of affected trees based on market rates.
Land valuation based on the median registered land
transfer rate over the previous 3 years.
Land valuation is to be based on current replacement
(market) value.
Structures valuation based on official rates, with
depreciation deducted from the gross value.
Valuation of structures based on current market
value/cost of new construction of the structure
Land Acquisition Collector (LAC) is the only prelitigation final authority to decide disputes and
address complaints regarding
quantification/compensation for the affected lands
and other assets.
Complaints and grievances are resolved informally
through community participation in the Grievance
Redress Committees (GRC), local governments, NGO
and/or local-level community based organizations
LARP D.G. Khan 500kV Subproject – Final Draft November 2007
Page 5
Power Transmission Enhancement Program
2.4
Remedial Measures to Bridge the Gap
17.
In principle, the Pakistani LAA and ADB Policy adhere not only to the objective of
AH compensation, but also to the objective of rehabilitation. However, the LAA is
unclear on how rehabilitation is to be achieved and in practice the provision of
rehabilitation is left to ad hoc arrangements taken by local governments and specific
project proponents. To clarify these issues and reconcile eventual gaps between
Pakistan Law and ADB Policy, the NTDC had prepared the Land Acquisition and
Resettlement Framework (LARF) in 2006 under tranche 1 of this program2, to
ensure compensation at replacement cost of all items, the rehabilitation of informal
settlers, and provision of subsidies or allowances for AHs that may be relocated,
suffer business losses, or may be severely affected. Since tranche 2 is the
continuation of the same Power Transmission Enhancement Program and NTDC’s
approach to land acquisition and resettlement activities remains the same, the LARF
prepared by NTDC for Tranche 1 is valid and applicable to the subprojects included
in tranche 2.
2.5
Legislation Relevant to Land Classification
18.
In terms of application of the LARF prepared for the program, identifying the type of
land affected is an important step in determining eligibility for compensation for land.
Jurisdiction rather than use classifies land. Rural land includes irrigated land and
un-irrigated land and is governed by the Land Revenue Act (1967) which must be
read in conjunction with the LAA and other legislation that may also apply, including
for example the Punjab Alienation of Land Act (1900), Colonization of Government
Lands Act (1912) and the various Land Reform Regulations. Rural land falls under
the jurisdiction of revenue districts.
19.
Land, other than rural land, is urban and including all permutations there-under such
as residential, commercial, built upon and build able, and is governed by various
regulations and ordinances including the People’s Local Government Ordinance
(1972) for each province, Cantonments Act (1924), and Land Control Act (1952).
Urban land falls under the jurisdiction of municipal and local government authorities.
20.
While there are broad definitions of rural and urban land in the People’s Local
Government Ordinances, such classifications are not immutable and have been, and
are, changed by the Collector of Revenues and provincial governments over time. In
general it is either the People’s Local Government Ordinances or the Land Revenue
Act that determines the classification of land, however there are some cases where
both applies and other cases where different legislation altogether can dictate
jurisdiction and classification over land. Hence there is neither a universal
classification nor legislation pertaining to the land that will be potentially affected
under the program.
2.6
Compensation Eligibility and Entitlements for the Project
21.
Land acquisition and asset (crops, trees, etc.) compensation tasks under the
program, and for this D. G. Khan subproject, will be implemented according to a
compensation eligibility and entitlements framework in line with Pakistan’s
law/regulation and ADB Policy. In case of a difference, the ADB Policy will prevail.
22.
A summary eligibility and entitlements matrix is provided in Table 2.2.
2
The program’s LARF was prepared by NTDC and endorsed and uploaded on ADB’s website in October 2006.
LARP D.G. Khan 500kV Subproject – Final Draft November 2007
Page 6
Power Transmission Enhancement Program
Table 2.2: Compensation Eligibility and Entitlements Matrix
Asset
Specification
Affected People
Farmer/Titleholder
Arable Land
Access is not
restricted and
existing or current
land use will
remain unchanged
Leaseholder
(registered or not)
Sharecroppers
(registered or not)
Agricultural workers
Squatters
Farmer/Titleholder
Arable Land
All adverse effects
on land use
independent of
severity of impact
Leaseholder
(registered or not)
Sharecroppers
(registered or not)
Agricultural workers
Squatters
Farmer/Titleholder
Leaseholder
Arable Land
Additional for
severe impacts
(>10% of land loss)
Sharecroppers
(registered or not)
Squatters
Residential/
Commercial
Land
Titleholder
Renter/Leaseholder
Squatters
Houses and
Structures
All relevant APs
(including squatters)
LARP D.G. Khan 500kV Subproject – Final Draft November 2007
Compensation Entitlements
No Land compensation provided that land is
rehabilitated/restored to former quality following
completion of works. Compensation, in cash,
for all damaged crops and trees as per item
below
No Land compensation provided that the land is
rehabilitated/restored to former quality following
completion of works. Compensation, in cash,
for all damaged crops and trees as per item
below
Compensation, in cash or kind, for all damaged
crops/trees as per item below
Compensation, in cash or kind, for all damaged
crops/trees as per item below
Compensation, in cash or kind, for all damaged
crops/trees as per item below
Land for land compensation with plots of equal
value and productivity to the plots lost; or cash
for affected land at replacement cost based on
market value a plus 15% compulsory
acquisition surcharge and free of taxes,
registration, and transfer costs
Renewal of lease in plots of equal
value/productivity of plots lost, or Cash
equivalent to market value of gross yield of
affected land for the remaining lease years (up
to a maximum of 3 years).
Cash compensation equal to market value of
lost harvest share once (temporary impact) or
twice (permanent impact)
Cash indemnity equal to salary (including
portions in kind) for remaining part of
agricultural year.
1 rehabilitation allowance equal to market value
of 1 gross harvest (additional to crop
compensation) for land use loss.
1 severe impact allowance equal to market
value of gross harvest of affected land for 1
year (inclusive of winter and summer crop and
additional to standard crop compensation)
1 severe impact allowance equal to market
value of harvest share (additional to standard
crop compensation)
1 severe impact allowance equal to market
value of gross harvest of the affected land for 1
year (inclusive of winter and summer crop and
additional to standard crop compensation)
Land x land through provision of plots
comparable in value/location to plot lost; or
cash for affected land at full replacement cost
free of taxes, registration, transfer costs plus
15% compulsory acquisition surcharge.
1-3 months allowance
Accommodation in a government resettlement
area or a self-relocation allowance
Cash compensation at replacement rate for
affected structure/other fixed assets free of
salvaged materials, depreciation or transaction
costs. For partial impacts full cash assistance
to restore remaining structure.
Page 7
Power Transmission Enhancement Program
Asset
Specification
Affected People
Crops
Crops affected
All APs (also squatters)
Trees
Trees affected
All APs also squatters)
Business
Employment
Loss of business or
employment
All APs (including
squatters)
Relocation
Transport,
transition costs
All APs so affected
Community
Vulnerable AP
AP below poverty line
Compensation Entitlements
Crop compensation in cash at full market rate
for one harvest (either winter or summer) by
default for impacts caused by tower bases and
perimeter, stringing and access.
All other crop losses will be compensated at
market rates based on actual losses.
Cash compensation shall reflect income
replacement
Business owner: (i) Cash compensation equal
to 1 year income, if loss permanent; (ii) cash
compensation for the period of business
interruption, if loss is temporary.
Worker/employee: lost wages indemnity for the
business interruption period up to a 3 months
maximum.
Provision of sufficient allowance to cover
transport expenses and livelihood expenses for
one month.
Rehabilitation/substitution of affected
structures/utilities (i.e. mosques, roads,
schools etc.
Employment priority in project-related jobs.
2.7
Eligibility
23.
AHs will be entitled to compensation or rehabilitation provisions under the program
as follows:
•
All AHs affected by restricted access to, or use of, land whether they have
legal title/traditional land rights or not;
•
Tenants and sharecroppers whether registered or not;
•
Owners of buildings, crops, plants, or other objects attached to land; and
•
AHs losing business, incomes and/or salaries.
24.
Cut-off Date: Compensation eligibility will be limited by a cut-off date fixed at the
24th May 2007 for this Subproject, which was the last day of the AH inventory of
losses (IOL) census and impact assessment fieldwork. Any AHs who settle in the
affected areas and/or make changes in the land use patterns after this cut-off date
will not be eligible for compensation. They will, however, be given sufficient advance
notice requesting them to clear crops, vacate premises/corridor and dismantle
affected structures/establishments (if any) prior to project implementation. They will
be allowed to reuse their salvaged material for free and they will not be asked to pay
any fine. Forced eviction will only be considered after all other efforts have been
exhausted.
2.8
Strategy for the Compensation of Land Affected by Towers
25.
Besides the amended LAA, the NTDC has adopted the Telegraph Act (1885) (as
amended) for the construction and maintenance of power transmission lines. The latter
Act was originally framed for the construction of telegraphic poles during the British Era
and later inherited by Pakistan upon independence. This Act was subsequently
adopted by WAPDA for electric poles and supply lines, and eventually passed to
NTDC. However, telegraphic or electric poles cover a much smaller area of land
LARP D.G. Khan 500kV Subproject – Final Draft November 2007
Page 8
Power Transmission Enhancement Program
compared with transmission towers which have the potential to affect crops and
grazing shrubs. The NTDC makes utmost efforts to minimize resettlement impacts,
alternatively NTDC compensates affected farmers for their crop losses.
26.
Thus, based on current Pakistani Law and NTDC’s practice, the land under the towers
is not acquired permanently and therefore compensation is not required for land. For
this Program, however, it was agreed between NTDC and ADB that the land under the
tower will be acquired but would only require compensation in the case where (i) in
rural areas, the tower hinders access to the land under the tower for cultivation; and/or,
(ii) in urban/residential areas, the tower restricts use of the land for housing
development. Based on this principle it was established that the strategy for
compensation of land affected by tower construction will be different for
urban/residential land (and its potential for housing development) and agricultural land.
In the case of urban/residential areas, the land under towers will be considered as
being permanently affected and therefore it will be acquired and compensated in full. In
the case of rural areas and agricultural land, as long as the towers provide sufficient
clearance to allow the continuation of crop cultivation, the land will be considered to be
temporarily affected (for the duration of tower installation and stringing of the lines) and
therefore will not be acquired nor compensated. However, for towers that have lowbars which would restrict the farmer’s access for cultivation activities, the land will be
acquired permanently and compensated for as such.
27.
The construction of towers on agricultural land however will still require the provision of
compensation for crops and loss of trees, for the area under the tower plus a small
perimeter surrounding it (an access and working area). The area included in the
perimeter has been assessed as 900 m2 for 220 kV towers and 2,500 m2 for 500 kV
towers. Furthermore, as the construction of towers involves a 3-tier process, namely: (i)
preparation of the foundation; (ii) erection of the tower; and, (iii) stringing of the power
cables, and this process has the potential to affect three crops, and thus,
compensation for three crops will be paid to the affected farmers.
2.9
Compensation Entitlements
28.
Entitlement provisions for AHs losing crops or trees i.e. not affected by restricted
access to, or use of, land, will receive compensation as per the entitlement matrix.
For those AHs that will have restricted access to, or use of, land, and income losses
entitlement provisions will include compensation for such land losses, house and
buildings losses, crops and trees losses, a relocation subsidy, and a business losses
allowance based on tax declarations and/or lump sums. The entitlements are
detailed below:
•
Agricultural land impacts will be compensated based on whether an AH’s
access to or use of land is restricted. For those whose access to, and use of
agricultural land is not restricted i.e. they can continue to cultivate the land,
compensation will be for removed or damaged crops and trees. For AHs
whose access to, and use of, agricultural land is restricted i.e. they cannot
continue to cultivate the land, compensation will be at replacement value of
land in: (i) cash at current market rates plus a 15% compulsory acquisition
surcharge, or (ii) through replacement land equal in value/productivity to the
plot lost. When >10% of an AH income or agricultural land is affected, AH
(owners, leaseholders and sharecroppers) will get an additional allowance
for severe impacts equal to the market value of a year’s gross yield of the
land lost (inclusive of both winter and summer harvests). Eventual
transaction taxes/fees will be paid by NTDC or waived off by local
governments. Market rates will be assessed through a survey of prevalent
land prices or income from the lost crops and tree in the subproject areas.
LARP D.G. Khan 500kV Subproject – Final Draft November 2007
Page 9
Power Transmission Enhancement Program
•
Residential/commercial land will be compensated at replacement value
either (i) in the form of land for land or, (ii) cash at current market rates free
of deductions for transaction costs. Renters/leaseholders will receive an
allowance corresponding to a 3 months rent.
•
Houses, buildings, structures will be compensated in cash at replacement
cost free of depreciation, salvaged materials, and transaction costs
deductions. The compensation will also include the cost of lost water and
electricity connections.
•
Crops: Cash compensation at current market rates for net harvest actually
lost during one or both cropping seasons. Crop compensation will be paid
both to landowners and tenants based on their lease or sharecropping
agreements,
•
Trees: Cash compensation shall reflect income replacement (see below).
•
Businesses: compensation for permanent business losses will be in cash for
a one-year income based on tax declaration or, if unavailable, based on the
official minimum salary; compensation for temporary business will be in
cash covering the income of the interruption period based on tax declaration
or, unavailable, official minimum salary.
•
Business workers and employees: Indemnity for lost wages for the period of
business interruption up to a maximum of 3 months.
•
Agricultural land leaseholders, sharecroppers, and workers: Where the
access to, or use of, the land is restricted; affected leaseholders will receive
either a renewal of the lease in other plots or cash corresponding to the
yearly yield of land lost for the remaining years of the lease up to a
maximum of 3 years. Sharecroppers will receive their share of harvest at
market rates (if impact is temporary) plus 1 additional crop compensation (if
the land is lost permanently). Agricultural workers, with contracts to be
interrupted, will get an indemnity in cash corresponding to their salary in
cash and kind for the remaining part of the agricultural year (inclusive of
both winter and summer crop).
•
Relocation subsidy: AHs forced to relocate will receive a relocation subsidy
sufficient to cover transport costs and living expenses for 1 month.
•
House renters: House renters who have leased a house for residential
purposes will be provided with a cash grant of 3 months’ rent at the
prevailing market rate in the area and will be assisted in identifying
alternative accommodation.
•
Community structures and public utilities: Will be fully replaced or
rehabilitated so as to satisfy their pre-project functions.
•
Vulnerable people livelihood: Vulnerable people (AHs below the poverty
line) will be given priority in employment in project-related jobs.
2.10
Assessment of Compensation Unit Values
29.
The methodology for assessing unit compensation values of different affected items
is as follows:
•
Land shall be valued at current replacement cost based on a land sales
survey in the year before the impact survey. No deductions for
taxes/transaction costs will be applied.
LARP D.G. Khan 500kV Subproject – Final Draft November 2007
Page 10
Power Transmission Enhancement Program
•
Houses/buildings will be valued at replacement value based on cost of
materials, type of construction, labor, transport and other construction costs.
No deductions will be applied for depreciation, salvaged materials and
transaction costs.
•
Annual crops will be valued at net market rates at the farm gate for the first
year crop. In the eventuality that more than one-year compensation is due
to the AHs the crops after the first will be compensated at gross market
value.
•
Fruit trees will be valued based on age category (a. seedling; b. not yet
productive; c. productive). Productive trees will be valued at gross market
value of 1 year income x the number of years needed to grow a new tree
with the productive potential of the lost tree.
LARP D.G. Khan 500kV Subproject – Final Draft November 2007
Page 11
Power Transmission Enhancement Program
3.
IMPACTS ASSESSMENT
3.1
Introduction
3.1.1
Minimization of Impacts
30.
The NTDC attempts to take all possible steps to reduce land acquisition and
minimize the likely adverse impacts on the local communities in the design and
implementation of its power transmission enhancement subprojects. Accordingly,
the following measures were taken to avoid and minimize the likely resettlement
impacts of this Subproject:
•
To avoid impacts of land acquisition on the local farming community, NTDC
has located the new 500 kV sub-station on state owned land. The selected
site (41 ha) is part of a large area of rangeland with poor vegetation (coarse
grasses and other drought resistant shrubs), there are no trees on the site.
As such, this land is not used by the local communities for any economic
purposes such as grazing or firewood collection;
•
The alignments of the transmission lines were modified at a number of
locations to avoid compact housing areas and scattered farm-houses, three
fruit orchards, two brick kilns, three poultry farms, and three schools; and
•
The design of Tower No. D-21 was modified to provide a safer distance and
vertical clearance for a single farm-house with a tube-well.
31.
As a result, no buildings or farming enterprises (i.e. poultry farms, crops, fruit
orchards) or related structures (i.e. tube-wells, farm-houses) are affected by the substation. The transmission lines will, however, traverse agricultural land (including
some un-productive or abandoned land), where crops and trees within the 50 m
wide safety corridor will be affected. In summary the Subproject (sub-station and
transmissions lines) will not affect any structures.
3.1.2
Resettlement Field Survey
32.
The resettlement survey team, comprising one resettlement specialist, two male and
one female field surveyors, along with the technical surveyor conducted the
fieldwork in D. G. Khan 500 kV Subproject area from 16th to 24th May 2007. Thus,
the NTDC has fixed 24th May, 2007 as the cut-off-date for this Subproject. No
subsequent changes in land use pattern or construction of any structure will be
entertained for any compensation or assistance under this Subproject. As a general
strategy, the layout of the site and a technical drawings showing line profile with
identification of tower sites were provided as pre-requisites for carrying out the
resettlement field survey (RFS). The field work involved impact assessment by
quantifying and costing the affected lands and other assets (crops, trees, etc.)
through a participatory inventory of losses, collection of socio-economic data on
AHs, and consultation with the men and women of AHs and the affected
communities.3
3.2
Impacts of Substation
33.
The selected site for the new D. G. Khan 500 kV substation is situated about 11 km
from D. G. Khan town on Sakhi Sarwar Road, and is part of a barren land. The site
of 41 ha (820m x 500m) represents a small portion (5%) of an 800 ha area
3
Socio-economic survey findings are presented in Section 4 and Section 6 - Consultations and Disclosure.
LARP D.G. Khan 500kV Subproject – Final Draft November 2007
Page 12
Power Transmission Enhancement Program
designated as rangeland and formally administered by Punjab Forest Department.
Most uncultivated land, with or without forest cover, in the Punjab Province is
formally administered by the Forest Department on behalf of the Provincial
Government. NTDC has already initiated the process of purchase and transfer of
this piece of land from the Provincial Government.
34.
The selected site has poor and scanty vegetation, primarily being coarse grasses
and wild shrubs, there are no trees. As such, this land not is used by the local
communities for grazing, firewood collection, and/or any other economic purposes.
This has been confirmed by the RFS team through consultation with the local
communities as well as the Divisional Forest Officer (Rangelands). Further, it is
unlikely the area could be developed for forestry or plantation as there are no water
resources in proximity to the rangeland. Thus, partly as a result of protection by
Forest Department and partly due to poor vegetation and lack of water, the
community has not developed the land for any productive purposes such as grazing,
growing crops or firewood collection. As the local community, including any nontitled people, is not using the land, there will be no adverse impacts as a result of
sub-station construction.
3.3
Impacts of Transmission Line
3.3.1
General Description
35.
As specified in Section 2, the strategy for the compensation of land affected by tower
construction will be different for urban/residential land and rural (agricultural) land. In the
case of urban or residential land the land under the tower will be considered as being
permanently affected and therefore it will be acquired and compensated in full. In the
case of agricultural land, as long as towers provide sufficient clearance to allow crop
cultivation, the land will be considered as temporarily affected and therefore will not be
acquired nor compensated. The construction of towers on agricultural land will require
compensation for crops lost from the area under the tower and also in a small perimeter
surrounding it. The area included in this perimeter has been assessed to be 2,500 m2 for
a 500 kV tower. Finally, transmission line construction will also permanently affect all
houses/structures and trees higher than 6 m both under and between towers within a 30
m corridor as this corridor needs to be cleared for safety reasons. Such houses,
structures, and trees will be compensated. Crop cultivation within the corridor can
continue after the stringing of lines has taken place. During stringing operations it is
expected that one harvest will be lost.
36.
The new D. G. Khan 500kV will be connected to the existing 500kV Guddu – Multan
TL, passing by Aaliwala village adjacent to Indus Highway, by means of a 20.8 km
long new line. It will traverse intensively irrigated private farmlands (91%) and
across a short section of Government owned uncultivated lands (9%), as shown in
Table 3.1, overleaf. No land will be acquired permanently for the TL, nevertheless,
its construction and installation works will temporarily affect seasonal crops and all
trees will be removed permanently (see Appendix 1: Working Tables).
37.
The transmission line for this Subproject will consist of the following sections:
•
Line A - incoming single circuit line (1.7 km; 6 towers) to be connected to
existing line.
•
Line B - outgoing single circuit line (1.7 km; 6 towers) to be connected to
existing line.
•
Line D - double circuit line (17.4 km; 55 towers) to be connected to the new
sub-station.
LARP D.G. Khan 500kV Subproject – Final Draft November 2007
Page 13
Power Transmission Enhancement Program
Table 3.1: Types of Land Traversed by Transmission Line
Length of Line (m)
Transmission Line
Private Land
(Cultivated)
Govt Land
(Uncultivated)
Total Length
Percentage
(A) Incoming Single
1,717
10
1,727
8.3
(B) Outgoing Single
1,690
6
1,696
8.1
(D) Double Circuit
15,557
1,852
17,409
83.6
1,868
20,832
100.0
Totals:
Percentages:
18,964
91.0
9.0
100.0
--
38.
Major crops grown in the area are wheat in the Rabi season (winter-spring) and
cotton in the Kharif season (summer-autumn). This dominant cropping pattern of
wheat-cotton rotation covers 96% of the farmlands, while sugarcane, maize/fodder
and vegetables are grown on the remaining lands (4%). Thus, the Subproject’s
impact assessment has been made on the basis of wheat and cotton crop loss.
39.
In addition, there are three large fruit orchards, which were avoided successfully in
the technical design. However, scattered trees are found along some farm
boundaries, including fruit trees (date palm and mango) and wood tree species,
Shisham (sisso) and Sirin or Saras (albizea lebbek) being the most common,
followed by Toot (mulberry) and Kikar (acasia nicolta).. NTDC made modifications
ot the TL alignment to avoid as many trees as possible. As a result, only 542 trees
will need to be removed from the 50m wide corridor of the transmission line.
3.3.2
Impacts of Towers
40.
The new 500kV TL will require the construction of a total 67 towers. No private or
public land will be acquired permanently, as none of the towers will be constructed in
an established urban or a developing housing area, and access under the tower will
be maintained as the towers provide sufficient clearance for unhindered access by
tractors (Figure 3.1), and thus, will allow continued and unencumbered cultivation of
AHs’ lands. The farmlands under and around towers will, however, be temporarily
affected by the loss of crops and trees during a 3-tier process of tower construction,
namely: (i) construction of foundations, (ii) erection of towers, and (iii) stringing of
power cables. The whole process is usually completed in a period of 12 to 18
months, thereby causing crop losses for up to three cropping seasons. Accordingly,
cash compensation will be paid to the affected farmers for the loss of agricultural
crops for three seasons.
LARP D.G. Khan 500kV Subproject – Final Draft November 2007
Page 14
Power Transmission Enhancement Program
Figure 3.1: Photograph Showing Clearance under a 500kV Tower
41.
Of the total 67 towers, 60 towers will be located on private farmlands, while the
remaining 7 towers will be located on uncultivated government land, near the substation site. For compensation purposes, the land affected by tower installation,
includes the area under the tower and also a small perimeter surrounding the tower
(for access, working and storage areas), the total area is assessed to be an average
size of 2,500 m2 (0.25 ha) per tower. Thus, the 67 towers will temporarily require a
total area of 167,500 m2 (16.75 ha), of which 60 towers will affect 150,000 m2 (15
ha) of private farmlands, and 7 towers will be constructed on 17,500 m2 of
uncultivated government land near the sub-station site. Some 39 AHs will be
affected by the construction of the 60 towers (Table 3.2).
Table 3.2: Resettlement Impacts of Towers on Private Farmland
Transmission Line
Affected Area
No. of
Towers
No. of AHs
m
2
ha
(A) Incoming Single Circuit
5*
6
15,000
1.5
(B) Outgoing Single Circuit
5
6
15,000
1.5
29*
48**
120,000
12.0
39
60
150,000
15.0
(D) Double Circuit Line
Totals:
*
One AH is affected by two towers (last tower of Line A and first tower of Line D).
**
Does not include 7 towers on uncultivated government land.
LARP D.G. Khan 500kV Subproject – Final Draft November 2007
Page 15
Power Transmission Enhancement Program
3.3.3
Impacts of Lines
42.
The TL corridor will cause loss of crops during the stringing of the cables. This final
activity is usually carried out quickly, one stretch at a time, and completed within one
season, therefore one-crop compensation will be paid to affected farmers. No crop
compensation will be paid for TL sections passing over uncultivated land. Cash
compensation will also be paid for the loss or removal of their trees falling within
50m wide corridor. No built-up structures (including private houses, farm-houses,
shops, and community buildings, graveyards, etc.) are affected, and thus, no
compensation and/or financial assistance is required for these purposes.
43.
Tables 3.3, 3.4 and 3.5 show the total length of TL corridor (excluding the land under
the towers) is 17.48 km, with a total affected area of 87.41 ha. Of the total TL
corridor, over 91% of the length will traverse private farmlands and 9% over
uncultivated government land. As a result, some 25 AH (39.1%) of the total 64 AH
will be affected temporarily by the TL corridor during the stringing activity,
Table 3.3: Distribution of TL Corridor* by Type of Land
Transmission Line
Affected Area (m2)
Private
Uncultivated
Farmland
Govt Land
Length of TL Corridor (m)
Private
Uncultivated
Farmland
Govt Land
(A) Incoming Single
1,417
10
70,850
500
(B) Outgoing Single
1,390
6
69,500
300
(D) Double Circuit
13.157
1,502
657,850
75,100
Total
15,964
1,518
798,200
75,900
2
* The land falling in-between the towers (excluding the 2,500m plots under each tower).
Table 3.4: Resettlement Impacts of TL Corridor* Private Farmlands
Transmission Line
Total
(m)Length
(m)
Number of
Ahs
Affected Area
m
2
ha
(A) Incoming Single Circuit
12
1,417
70,850
7.09
(B) Outgoing Single Circuit
7
1,390
69,500
6.95
(D) Double Circuit Line
45
13,157
657,850
65.78
Total:
64
15,964
798,200
79.82
* The 50m wide strip of land under the power cable falling in-between the towers.
Table 3.5: Area of Crop Temporarily Affected by Village
Transmission Line
Area of crop (ha)
Aaliwala
Paigan
Gadai
Total
Line A (Incoming Single: 6 towers)
8.83
-
-
8.83
Line B (Outgoing Single: 6 towers)
8.45
-
-
8.45
Line D (Double Circuit: 48 towers)
9.37
33.41
34.76
77.54
Total Area:
26.65
33.41
34.76
94.82
Percentage:
28.1
35.2
36.7
100.0
LARP D.G. Khan 500kV Subproject – Final Draft November 2007
Page 16
Power Transmission Enhancement Program
3.3.4
Other Impacts and Summary
44.
Overall, 64 AHs will be affected by the construction of the TL, of whom 39 AHs will
be affected by both towers and TL corridor, while 25 AHs will be affected only by the
TL corridor only during the stringing activity (Table 3.6). The 39 AHs will be paid
compensation for three crops (two for crops being affected due to construction and
erection of the towers, and the third for crop damage/loss by the stringing activity).
The 25 AHs who will experience crop damage or loss due to the stringing activity in
the TL corridor will be paid compensation for one crop.
Table 3.6: Total Area of Affected Crops
Affected Crops
Transmission Line
45.
Private Farmlands (ha)
Total
Tower
Government Land (ha)
Corridor
Total
Tower
Corridor
(A) Incoming Single
8.58
1.50
7.08
0.0
0.0
0.0
(B) Outgoing Single
8.45
1.50
6.95
0.0
0.0
0.0
(D) Double Circuit
77.79
12.00
65.79
0.0
0.0
0.0
Total:
94.82
15.00
78.82
0.0
0.0
0.0
In addition to crop loss, trees will be affected and removed from the 50m wide
corridor of the TL. As shown in Table 3.7, some 48 AHs (73% of total 64 AHs) will
lose 542 trees (122 fruit trees and 420 wood trees). Most are trees located
individually or in clusters, mostly on field boundaries. There are no plantations or
fruit orchards affected. Of the 542 trees, 458 trees will be affected by the TL corridor,
while the remaining 84 trees will be affected by tower construction.
Table 3.7: Total Number of Affected Fruit and Wood Trees (D. G. Khan)
Affected Tree
Type
Fruit
Species
Line B
Mango
Date Palm
Sub-Total (a): Fruit Trees
Wood*
Trees
Number of Affected Trees by Type of Line (No.)
Line A
Line D
Total
0
3
9
12
24
16
70
110
24
19
79
122
Shisham/Sisso
25
14
121
160
Sirin/Saras
14
12
87
113
Kikar/Acasia
9
11
37
57
Toot/Mulberry
6
4
52
62
4
8
16
28
Sub-Total (b): Wood Trees
Poplar/Eucalypt
58
49
313
420
Total Affected Trees (a+b):
82
68
392
542
* Botanical Names: Shisham = Sisso; Sirin = Albizia Lebbek; Kikar = Acacia Nicolta; Toot = Mulberry.
46.
Compensation for affected trees is based on their total removal. Compensation for
fruit trees is based on the current market price of fruit production for the number of
years required for a tree to mature sufficiently to produce fruit, as shown in Table
3.8. For affected wood trees, compensation is based on current market rate of the
wood, which is assessed on the basis of tree size (height and girth) as shown in
Table 3.9.
LARP D.G. Khan 500kV Subproject – Final Draft November 2007
Page 17
Power Transmission Enhancement Program
Table 3.8: Categorization and Income Replacement Values of Affected Fruit Trees
Categorization
Affected
Fruit Tree
Date Palm
Mango
No. of Fruit
Potential for Fruiting
Income
Maturity
Age
Harvests
Period
Annual
Replacement
Level
(Years)
Per Year
(Years)
Income (Rs)
Value (Rs.)
Immature
up to 10
0
15
1,000
15,000
Mature-1
10 - 20
1
10
1,000
10,000
Mature-2
above 20
1
5
700
3,500
Immature
up to 08
0
12
1,700
20,400
Mature-1
08 - 16
1
8
1,700
13,600
Mature-2
above 16
1
4
1,200
4,800
Table 3.9: Relative Sizes of Affected Wood Trees by Height and Girth
Wood Tree
Small
Height (m)
Medium
Girth (m)
Height (m)
Large
Girth (m)
Height (m)
Girth (m)
Shisham
< 3.8
< 0.5
3.9 - 7.6
0.5 - 0.9
>7.7
>1.0
Eucalyptus
< 4.6
< 0.3
4.6 - 9.1
0.4 - 0.5
>9.1
>0.5
Kikar
< 3.0
< 0.5
3.1 - 6.1
0.5 - 0.9
>6.1
>1.0
Mulberry
< 3.0
< 0.5
3.1 - 6.1
0.5 - 0.9
>6.1
>1.0
Sirin/Saras
< 3.8
< 0.5
3.9 - 7.6
0.5 - 0.9
>7.7
>1.0
47.
As noted previously, the impacts of the Subproject include the loss of crops and
trees. There are no houses or other structures affected, there are no community
property resources nor any business activities affected by the Subproject.
3.4
Census of Affected Households
3.4.1
AHs Affected by Towers and Transmission Line
48.
The construction of 20.8 km long 500kV TL will traverse irrigated farmlands in three
villages; Aaliwala, Paigan and Gadai, as shown in Tables 3.10 and 3.11
Table 3.10: Households Affected by Towers and TL Corridor
Transmission Line
Total
Length
(km)
Number of AHs
Total No.
of Towers
Towers + TL
TL Corridor
Total
(A) Incoming Single
1.7
6
5
7
12
(B) Outgoing Single
1.7
6
5
2
7
(D) Double Circuit
17.4
48*
29
16
45
Total:
20.8
60
39
25
64
-
-
60.9
39.1
100.0
Percentage:
* Excluding towers located on uncultivated government land.
LARP D.G. Khan 500kV Subproject – Final Draft November 2007
Page 18
Power Transmission Enhancement Program
Table 3.11: Affected Households by Village
AHs by Village
Household Affected by
Aaliwala
Paigan
Gadai
Total
Line A (Incoming Single: 6 towers)
12
-
-
12
Line B (Outgoing Single: 6 towers)
7
-
-
7
Line D (Double Circuit: 48 towers)
3
19
23
45
22
19
23
64
Total (60 Towers):
3.4.2
Significance of Impacts
49.
The impact of loss of crops will be minor (non-significant) for each of the 64 AHs, as
they have relatively large farms with highly fertile lands. The impacts equate to less
than 10% of the total productive land of each individual farmer (Table 3.10). The
50m wide strip of land will be acquired temporarily as a working corridor for
installation of the new towers and stringing of the power lines.
Table 3.10: Percentage of Crop Lost by Affected Households
TL
Crop Loss (%)
No. of AHs
Minimum
Maximum
Average
Line A
12
3.31
8.94
5.65
Line B
07
2.40
7.95
5.92
Line D
45
2.11
8.35
5.56
Total
64
2.11
8.94
5.62
50.
The transmission line and towers will affect only agricultural crops, no AHs will be
experience restricted access to, or use of, their farmlands. Cotton and/or wheat
crops will be affected on 94.82 ha of private land, overall the impact of crop loss is
insignificant (average of 5.6%) and ranges from 2.1% to 8.9%.
51.
As explained in Section 4, none of the 64 AHs are vulnerable (or include individually
vulnerable people), as their incomes are such that they are above the national
poverty line4, and they live predominantly in a joint/extended family system which
serves as a safety net against external economic shocks. None of the 64 AHs were
found to be headed by a widow or unmarried woman, nor any disabled person as
such persons (if any) are supported by their relatives living in the same households.
Finally, the overall community impact (i.e. village level) will be negligible to just
minor.
3.5
Impacts on Public Land and Infrastructure
52.
In addition to the 41 ha uncultivated government land to be purchased for the new
500kV sub-station, the TL corridor will traverse government land and infrastructure.
4
See Table A-6 (Per Capita Incomes), In Appendix 1: Working Tables, for details on Incomes of all the affected households.
LARP D.G. Khan 500kV Subproject – Final Draft November 2007
Page 19
Power Transmission Enhancement Program
53.
The TL corridor will cross over N-55 - Indus Highway, a railway track, and three
irrigation canals. Thus, a total four No-Objection Certificates (NOCs) will be required
from the following agencies:
(a)
Federal Agencies:
(i)
National Highway Authority (NHA); and,
(ii) Pakistan Railways (PR);
(b)
Provincial Departments:
(iii) Punjab Forest Department (PFD); and,
(iv) Punjab Irrigation Department (PID).
54.
No special action, other than advance notice, will be required for crossing over minor
infrastructure, i.e., smaller rural access roads or watercourses. For crossing major
infrastructure NTDC will be required to continue consultation, obtain formal
permission through a NOC from each concerned federal and provincial
departments/agencies, and provide advance notice of commencement of works.
NTDC will not be required to pay a fee or compensation.
55
Table 3.12 provides further details on impacts on public infrastructure.5
Table 3.12: Infrastructure Traversed by Transmission Line Corridor
Tower Nos.
5
Infrastructure
Length
(m)
Agency
From
To
Level
Agency
D 07
D 08
Indus Highway (N-55)
64 Federal
NHA
D 10
D 11
Ishoria Branch Canal
20 Provincial
PID
D 14
D 15
Railway Track (Paighan)
16 Federal
PR
D 17
D 18
Minor Canal + Rural Road
32 Provincial
PID
D 19
D 20
Minor Canal + Drain
24 Provincial
PID
D 29
D 30
Main Drain
18 Provincial
PID
D 38
D 39
Minor Canal
15 Provincial
PID
D 41
D 42
Canal Distributary
30 Provincial
PID
D 47
D 48
Twin Canals: D. G. Canal & Kachhi Canal
121 Provincial
PID
Smaller rural access roads, watercourses, etc. (minor infrastructure) are not included here; for full details, please refer to
Appendix 1 (Working Table A-01).
LARP D.G. Khan 500kV Subproject – Final Draft November 2007
Page 20
Power Transmission Enhancement Program
4.
SOCIO-ECONOMIC PROFILE OF AFFECTED PEOPLE
4.1
Census of Affected Households
4.1.1
Methodology
56.
After obtaining the pre-requisite location maps, field layout and profile drawings,
revenue records and in-field assistance of a technical surveyor, intensive fieldwork
was carried out for preparing this Short LARP. The RFS was conducted between
May 16th and 24th 2007.
57.
The RFS involved taking field measurements, quantification and costing of the
affected assets with active community participation. The enumeration of AHs (100%)
included questions about their socio-economic characteristics in order to obtain
necessary socio-economic information.
58.
Community consultations were held at a number of villages all along the TL with
small groups of men and women, separately, belonging mostly to the affected
households (see Section 6 for details and Appendix 2 for the full list of participants).
59.
The field surveys were undertaken by a Resettlement Specialist, assisted by a team
of three Resettlement Surveyors; two male and one female. Most of the respondents
to the resettlement census survey were the heads of their household.
4.1.2
General Information on Affected Households
60.
As stated in Section 3, a total 64 households will be affected (with a total population
of 805 persons) who will experience a temporary and non-significant impacts on
agricultural crops and trees (Table 4.1). The description provided in this section
includes information about AHs as well as individuals (APs).
61.
All of the 64 AHs are Muslim, ethnically Siraiki, and speak Siraiki language (the
language spoken in the entire southern districts of the Punjab province).
62.
In terms of social group, while most AHs (86%) can trace their bloodlines to Baloch
tribes (especially Leghari sub-tribe) some can are linked with various Punjabi caste
social groups (14%).
Table 4.1: Affected Households and Population by Village
Village
No. of AHs
Affected Population
Aaliwala
22
277
Paigan
19
277
Gadai
23
251
Total
64
805
4.1.3
Indigenous People
63.
None of the AHs are tribal or minority members and all affected land is held in
private ownership (i.e. no tribal or communal ownership). Similarly, none of the 64
AHs were found to be vulnerable. The field work did identify five widows, three
disabled persons, and twenty-two aged persons among the AH group enumerated in
the survey. These people are not considered as vulnerable because they are wellprotected socio-economically by their joint and extended family structures, and
hence, they are not individually vulnerable, or pose a risk of increased vulnerability
on their families, to any adverse impacts to be caused by this Subproject.
LARP D.G. Khan 500kV Subproject – Final Draft November 2007
Page 21
Power Transmission Enhancement Program
64.
Therefore the standard provisions of the LARF and this LARP are sufficient to
ensure an effective compensation process and the requirements of ADB Policy on
Indigenous People are complied with. The ADB’s policy, as specified in the
Indigenous Peoples Development Framework (IPDF) prepared for this project is not
triggered, and therefore neither an IPDP nor special action is required for this
Subproject.
4.2
Data on Heads of Affected Households
65.
All heads of household are male, and are married, in all cases the spouse lives in
the same household (i.e. none are separated). Over three-quarters of household
heads (79%) are between 41 and 60 years old, some 16% are aged between 61 and
75 years old, while a small proportion (five per cent) are young, aged between 36
and 40 years. 62. As noted above, there are twenty–two elderly AHs (i.e. older
than 70 years).
66.
In terms of literacy and education, 57 per cent of household heads stated they are
literate (can read and write in Urdu). A third of household heads have no formal
education, a quarter of household heads have a primary education and 23 per cent
have a secondary education. Some six per cent have attained higher education
(including vocational, business/teacher training).
4.3
Data on Affected Households and Population
4.3.1
Households
67.
The AHs in the subproject area are large, with an average size of 12.5 persons,
indicating a dominant trend towards an extended family system. The smallest
household is made up of five persons and the largest household consists of 29
people. Tables 4.2 to 4.4 provide details on household size, and their age and
gender compositions. Table 4.4 shows that people aged between 26 and older
account for 60 per cent of AHs, suggesting a low dependency ratio as these people
are largely responsible for taking care of the household economy. Children and
youth account for the remaining 40 per cent who are the major consumers of the
household incomes, especially for education and health.
Table 4.2: Average Size of Affected Households
Household Size (Number of Persons)
Line
No. of AHs
Minimum
Maximum
Average
Line A
12
9
14
11.33
Line B
7
9
17
12.71
Line D
45
5
29
12.89
Total
64
5
29
12.58
Table 4.3: Gender Composition of Affected Households
Total Number of Persons
Line
No. AHs
Male
Female
Total
Line A
12
67
69
136
Line B
7
43
46
89
Line D
45
291
289
580
Total
64
401
404
805
LARP D.G. Khan 500kV Subproject – Final Draft November 2007
Page 22
Power Transmission Enhancement Program
Table 4.4: Age and Gender Composition of AHs
Age Group
Age in Years
Total Number of Persons
Male
Female
Total No.
Percentage
< 15
87
92
179
22.3
16 – 25
69
72
141
17.5
Adults
26 – 70
241
234
475
59.0
Elderly
Above 70
4
6
10
1.2
Total
All Ages
401
404
805
100.0
Children
Youth
4.3.2
Housing
68.
None of the AHs live in simple dwellings (constructed of thatch, sack, bamboo, clay
or earth). All respondents stated that they live in houses constructed of brick and
concrete. This was also confirmed by observations made during the field surveys.
This indicates that in general AHs appear to be economically well-off.
4.3.3
Livelihood and Incomes
69.
All AHs are agriculturists, and more specifically, landowner farmers. Table 4.5
shows that overall farm size of AHs is relatively large with an average of 25.8 ha,
and a range from 5.06 ha to 101.21 ha. This also indicates that AHs are socioeconomically stable compared with the standard size of small farms in the Punjab
province which is < 5.06 ha (or 12.5 acres).
Table 4.5: Farm Size of Affected Households
Farm Size (ha)
Line
70.
No. AHs
Minimum
Maximum
Average
Line A
12
5.06
20.24
12.55
Line B
7
10.12
38.87
18.57
Line D
45
5.06
101.21
30.58
Total
64
5.06
101.21
25.89
As shown in Table 4.6, 63% of male APs and 37% of female APs are engaged in
work for income. Most APs working for income are engaged in agriculture with 67%
overall (64% male and 28% female), and 21% are in paid employment with just over
half of APs being employed (55%) being female. The remaining proportion of APs
(12%) working for income are engaged in business, and accounts for more men
(58%) than women.
Table 4.6: Involvement of AHs by Gender in Income Sectors
Income
Sector
Number of APs
Male
Female
Sector as % of
total
Total
Agriculture
64
28
92
66.67
Business
10
07
17
12.32
Employment
13
16
29
21.01
Total (Sectors):
87
51
138
100.00
63.04
36.96
100.00
--
Percentage:
LARP D.G. Khan 500kV Subproject – Final Draft November 2007
Page 23
Power Transmission Enhancement Program
71.
As shown in Table 4.7 agriculture contributes 88% of the total income of AHs
followed by wages from employment (8%) and finally from business (4%). Also as
shown in that table, the total average income of males is higher than that of females,
even in the waged employment sector in which there are more active females than
males.
Table 4.7: Average Income by Sector & Gender
Average Income by Gender (Rs.)
Income
Sector
Male
Agriculture
Female
Sector as % of
total
Total
192,793.75
5,718.75
198,512.50
88.62
Business
6,750.00
1,828.13
8,578.13
3.83
Employment
9,421.88
7,500.00
16,921.88
7.55
208,965.63
15,046.88
224,012.51
100.00
93.28
6.72
100.00
---
Total:
Percentage:
4.3.4
Poverty Level
72.
In Pakistan, the poverty line is fixed at a monthly per capita income Rs. 849.00.
Based on the survey data none of the 64 AHs fall on or below this poverty line, and
even the minimum monthly per capita income is higher than the poverty line
(average Rs 958). As shown in Table 4.8, the average per capita monthly incomes
in AHs is relatively high with Rs. 1,461.00, and a range from Rs. 1,164 to Rs. 1,488.
Table 4.8: Monthly per Capita Income of Affected Households
Line
Monthly Per Capita Income (Rs.)
No. AHs
Minimum
Maximum
Average
Line A
12
997.00
1,400.00
1,164.20
Line B
07
958.00
1,500.00
1,158.00
Line D
45
978.00
2,188.00
1,488.00
Total
64
958.00
2,188.00
1,461.00
4.3.5
Literacy
73.
Table 4.9 shows an overall AP literacy rate of 56%. The literacy rate of male APs is
higher than that of female APs (59% compared with 40%). The literacy rate of the
children (up to 15 years of age) is found to be the highest at 76 per cent, with boys
rated at 86 per cent and the girls rated at 66 per cent.
Table 4.9: Literacy Rate of APs by Gender
APs
Male
Female
Total
Total Number of APs
401
404
805
Literate APs (Number)
269
180
449
AP Literacy Rate (%)
59.9
40.1
55.8
LARP D.G. Khan 500kV Subproject – Final Draft November 2007
Page 24
Power Transmission Enhancement Program
5.
INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENTS
74.
The compensation and rehabilitation program described in this LARP involves a
number of agencies including; NTDC as the implementing agency, the Punjab Board
of Revenue, the Ministry of Environment, NGOs, Provincial Government of Punjab,
and the Dera Ghazi Khan district government, as described in Figure 5.1 and
discussed below.
Figure 5.1 - LAR Organogram and Actions
Environmental Protection Ag.
LAR STEERING COMMITTEE
LOCAL GOVERNMENT
PROVINCE
Board of revenue
Other Departments
Land compensation
District Nazim
District Coordination Office (DCO)
District Departments
- Land Acquisition Collector(LAC)
PMU
PIU
Thesil Nazim
LAR CO-ORDINATION COMMITTEE
Union Councils
Other Compensation
Complaints and Grievances
Administrative Function
Co-ordination function
AP
Finance Direction
5.1
National Transmission and Dispatch Company
75.
NTDC has overall responsibility for the preparation, implementation and financing of
all tasks set out in this LARP as well as inter-agency coordination. NTDC will
exercise its functions through a centrally based Project Management Unit (PMU)
which will be responsible for general project execution, and at subproject level
through Project Implementation Units (PIUs) which will be tasked with day-to-day
project activities.
76.
Within the PMU, LARP tasks will be managed by a specific group; the Land
Acquisition and Resettlement Unit (LARU), which will update this LARP (including
surveys, asset valuation, community consultation, and approvals), and internally
monitor LARP implementation.
LARP D.G. Khan 500kV Subproject – Final Draft November 2007
Page 25
Power Transmission Enhancement Program
77.
In the implementation of these tasks the LARU will receive specific technical
assistance from:
•
Resettlement Specialist under the Design and Supervision Consultant team,
who will assist in LARU in land acquisition planning, LARP implementation,
internal monitoring, and imparting training to the NTDC and district
governments on impact assessment and entitlements, and ADB
policy/LARF requirements;
•
An impact assessment/valuation team hired as required to assist in on-site
preparation of surveys, base-line information gathering and AP consultation;
and
•
An external monitoring agency (EMA) to be hired to conduct periodic
monitoring and third party validation of LARP implementation (see Section
5.4).
5.2
District Government
78.
District governments have jurisdiction for land administration, valuation and
acquisition. At the provincial level these functions rest with the Board of Revenue
while at district level they rest with the District Collector Office (DCO) and the Land
Acquisition Collector (LAC) within the DCO. A number of minor agents, most notably
the Patwari, (the keeper of land records), carry out specific roles such as titles
identification and verification (see Figure 5.2). Functions pertaining to compensation
of assets different from land (i.e buildings, crops and trees) or income rehabilitation
also fall on the local governments, more specifically on the relevant District
Department.
Figure 5.2: Organization of District Land Acquisition Collector Office
EDO-R / LAC
Executive District Officer (Revenue)
(Land Acquisition Collector)
Tesildar / Naib Tehsildar
Land Acquisition Officers (LAO)
[Tehsil (Sub-District) Land Records
Officer]
Girdawar / Qanungo
Land Surveyor
(In-Charge, Land Records)
Patwari
Assistant Land Surveyor
(Land Records Clerks)
LARP D.G. Khan 500kV Subproject – Final Draft November 2007
Page 26
Power Transmission Enhancement Program
5.3
Other Agencies and Institutions
79.
As various agencies will need to be carefully coordinated so as to obtain effective,
smooth and timely LARP implementation, a land acquisition steering committee
(LASC) will be directly assigned to NTDC-PMU by the Punjab Board of Revenue
and district level coordination committees. The LASC will be established at
provincial level and will include NTDC’s General Manager; Provincial Chairman of
Planning & Development Department, or Additional Chief Secretary; Chairman
Punjab Board of Revenue; Director General Punjab-EPA; and, Project Director (PD)
NTDC-PMU (Figure 5.3).
80.
The LASC will meet periodically to ensure proper and timely formation of the district
level coordination committees to facilitate the LARP approval and implementation
processes.
Figure 5.3: Organization of Land Acquisition Steering Committee
Project Director
PMU, NTDC
(Chief Coordinator)
Provincial
Chairman, P&DD /
Additional Chief
Secretary
Chairman,
Provincial Board of
Revenue
(Principle Member)
Provincial
Director General,
EPA
Project Director,
PMU,
NTDC
81.
A Land Acquisition Coordination Committee (LACC) will be formed in D. G. Khan
Town to assist with the updating and implementation of the LARP (in particular
execution of surveys, valuation of assets, AH consultation, and local approval of
LARP provisions). The committee formation will be initiated by the NTDC-PMU,
including representatives of PIU, LARU, Tehsildars of the concerned districts and
Union Council Nazims representing the AHs (Figure 5.4).
82.
One of the LCC functions will be to offer AHs a communications channel and
support group for addressing complaints and grievances. In this function the LCC
will hear the complaint, and if found justified will support its lodging at the PMU (this
process is further described in Section 7).
83.
This LARP will require review and clearance by the Punjab Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) as part of Government’s Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA)
approval procedures, as well as approval by RSES, ADB (the division that assesses
compliance with the safeguard policies at ADB Headquarters in Manila, Philippines).
LARP D.G. Khan 500kV Subproject – Final Draft November 2007
Page 27
Power Transmission Enhancement Program
Figure 5.4: Organization of Land Acquisition Coordination Committee
District Coordination
Officer (DCO) /
Executive District
Officer (Revenue)
(Chairman)
5.4
84.
6
District Officer
(Revenue)
Tehsildar
(Revenue Officer)
Union Council
Nazim/s
Deputy Director,
PIU, NTDC
(Principle Member)
(Member)
(Member/s)
(Member-Secretary)
Responsibility for Monitoring
Land acquisition tasks under the project will be subjected to both internal and
external monitoring. Internal monitoring will be conducted by NTDC-PMU, assisted
by the design and supervision consultant. External monitoring responsibilities will be
assigned to an EMA (either a consultant or NGO) to be engaged by NTDC
according to the Terms of Reference (TOR) approved by ADB.6 This aspect of the
LARP implementation is further elaborated in Section 10 (Monitoring and
Evaluation).
Terms of Reference for External Monitoring are provided in Appendix 4.
LARP D.G. Khan 500kV Subproject – Final Draft November 2007
Page 28
Power Transmission Enhancement Program
6.
CONSULTATION AND DISCLOSURE
6.1
Consultation Undertaken for the LARP
85.
The consultative process undertaken for the preparation of the LARP has included
AHs, representatives of local governments in the Subproject area, and members of
local people’s organizations (e.g., CBCs, women’s organizations, peasant worker’s
organizations). Special attention was paid to identify if there were vulnerable groups
amongst AHs (such as the poor, women, and elderly) and if so, their needs, to
ensure that the views of both AHs and their communities have been considered in
the formulation of the LARP.
86.
Consultation with stakeholders at the different stages of the subproject is required by
ADB’s Policy on Involuntary Resettlement and the project’s LARF. To start with,
consultations with the AHs were conducted as part of the DMS and census.. The
communities’ and especially the AHs’ responses to the proposed subproject were
found to be positive.
87.
Along with the participatory DMS, semi-structured discussions aiming at community
awareness and regarding the project’s likely impacts were also held with the small
groups of men and women. Groups were formed of between 5 and 12 persons
(averaging 9 men and 7 women) from villages in the Subproject area.
88.
The participants were selected on the basis of their crop and trees losses,
knowledge of and interest in this Subproject, and finally their availability and
willingness to participate in discussions. A total of eight group consultation meetings
were held (5 groups of men and 3 groups of women) in the three union councils and
their associated villages. The total number of participants was 68, including 46 men
and 22 women (refer to Table 6.1).7
Table 6.1: Participants in Group Discussions and Consultations
No. of Groups
Village
89.
7
Men
Women
No. of Participants
Total
Men
Women
Total
Aaliwala
2
1
3
21
5
26
Paigan
2
1
3
16
7
23
Gadai
1
1
2
9
10
19
Total
5
3
8
46
22
68
The concerns raised during the consultation sessions, namely, the adequacy and
timeliness of the compensation payments, and incorporation of safety measures,
have been addressed by NTDC by making payment of crop and tree compensations
to all the 64 AHs at least one month (30 days) prior to the temporary use of their
farmlands (before starting the civil works), and instructing the Contractor/s to take all
possible safety measures during the entire the Subproject execution period,
especially during the construction and stringing activities.
Appendix 2 provides a complete listing of the participants by Gender and Villages.
LARP D.G. Khan 500kV Subproject – Final Draft November 2007
Page 29
Power Transmission Enhancement Program
90.
The local communities’ responses (awareness, perceptions and preferences) to the
D. G. Khan subproject and resettlement related matters are summarized as follows:
•
Impacts and resettlement – the subproject’s overall impacts were
considered minimal by the participants of the meetings. Thus, they
supported the Subproject for ensuring an adequate and non-interrupted
supply of power to their communities in particular, and to the country in
general;
•
The subproject is necessary under local conditions - all of people at the
meetings provided their support for the project stating that the current loadshedding and overloaded transmission lines require proper upgrading and
enhancement so that the transmission network is safe and has the capacity
to meet the needs of the communities;
•
Project awareness – the majority (82 per cent) of the participants are
somewhat aware of the upcoming subproject, but none of them knew of its
exact resettlement effects, the LARF nor entitlements for various types of
loss. However, on the basis their prior experience, almost all the
participants requested permission from NTDC for unrestricted use of their
affected farmlands after the completion of the project works; and
•
Clearance of structure/assets from the subproject corridors - as there are no
structures whether residential, commercial or cultural buildings affected and
therefore no questions were asked about this matter. Fruit orchards and
brick kilns have been avoided by minor alterations in the transmission line
route alignment and by using angular towers to ensure higher clearance of
transmission line above the fruit trees. For the affected “wood” trees that
would be falling within 50m wide strip of land under the TL, all participants
requested compensation based on the current open market values (and as
provided in the compensation rates survey reported in Section 8).
6.2
Compensation Options Discussed
91.
In addition to the focus group discussions and consultative meetings described
above, the RFS Census Survey included several questions regarding AHs’
preferences for compensation and rehabilitation options. This information has been
and will be used to assist in determining the support measures required by AHs.
92.
The first compensation priority of all AHs is for cash, rather than land or a
combination of cash and land. When asked why they preferred cash compensation,
half of all AHs stated the reason was to assist with daily living expenses, while only
three households stated it would compensate for their lost crops and/or trees. No
AHs stated they would use compensation monies for establishing a business or
agricultural activity or purchasing land. Some 20% of AHs stated they would use the
compensation money to pay a debt.
93.
AHs were also asked if they had a general knowledge of either the provisions of the
LAA, no AHs stated they were aware of the LAA or its general provisions. This
emphasizes the importance of provision of clear and timely information to AHs.
94.
Some 58% of AHs stated that people should not be asked to voluntarily give up their
land for public projects WITHOUT receiving compensation. For those that stated
that people could be asked to give up their land without receiving compensation,
only two reasons were given; if the people have other land or if the people being
asked to relinquish land would not be materially affected by the loss then voluntary
contributions are acceptable (i.e. if the losses to be suffered were small).
LARP D.G. Khan 500kV Subproject – Final Draft November 2007
Page 30
Power Transmission Enhancement Program
95.
In summary, the compensation and resettlement options discussed and agreed
upon during the consultation meetings included:
•
Relocation - not applicable;
•
Assistance - not applicable;
•
Compensation – the majority of AH representatives look forward to
receiving a “fair” and “timely” compensation for their lost/affected crops and
trees. By “fair”, they meant the application of prevalent open market rates,
or “replacement value” for their crop production and wood trees. By
“timely”, they meant prior to the temporary use of their lands and sustaining
any damage to or removal of their crops and trees, as provided for in the
LARF; and
•
Job opportunities - the more disadvantaged people in the villages requested
that NTDC assist them with job opportunities with the contractors, on a
priority basis, during project implementation.
6.3
LARP Disclosure
96.
An English version of the program’s LARF has already been uploaded to ADB’s
website and an Urdu version has been made available through NTDC’s
headquarters and PIUs in Subproject areas (second tranche).
97.
In line with ADB’s public communications policy, this LARP in English will also be
posted on the ADB website, while its translation in Urdu will be disclosed to the AHs
at the Dera Ghazi Khan PIU office and posted on the ADB website.
98.
In addition, a public information booklet in Urdu, summarizing compensation
provisions will be sent to all AHs (a draft booklet in English has been prepared as
provided in Appendix 3).
LARP D.G. Khan 500kV Subproject – Final Draft November 2007
Page 31
Power Transmission Enhancement Program
7.
GRIEVANCE REDRESS PROCESS
99.
A grievance mechanism will be available to allow an AH appealing any disagreeable
decision, practice or activity arising from land or other assets compensation. AHs will
be fully informed of their rights and of the procedures for addressing complaints
whether verbally or in writing during consultation, survey, and time of compensation.
100.
Care will always be taken to prevent grievances rather than going through a redress
process. This can be obtained through careful LAR design and implementation, by
ensuring full participation and consultation with the AHs, and by establishing
extensive communication and coordination between the community, the PMU, the
LAC and local governments in general.
101.
As finances will move differently for (i) land (for land use or access impacts) and (ii)
other items compensation or rehabilitation (in the first case funds will move from
NTDC through the District Collector Office to the AHs, while in the second funds will
go directly from NTDC to the AHs. The complaint and grievances will be addressed
through two different processes as described in Table 7.1.
Table 7.1: Grievance Resolution Process
Land & Crop Compensation Issues
Other Compensation or Project Issues
1. First, complaints resolution will be attempted at
village level through the involvement of the LARU,
NGO and informal mediators.
1. First, complaints resolution will be attempted at
village level through the involvement of the LARU, NGO
and informal mediators.
2. If still unsettled, a grievance can then be lodged
to the LAC who has 30 days to decide on the case.
2. If still unsettled, a grievance can be lodged to the
PIU/LARU, which will have 30 days to respond.
3. If no solution was reached a grievance can be
lodged with support of the LCC to the PMU. The
AH must lodge the complaint within 1 month of
lodging the original complaint with the LAC and
must produce documents supporting his/her claim.
The PMU will provide the decision within 21 days of
registering the complaint. The PMU decision must
be in compliance with this LARF provisions.
3. If no solution was reached a grievance can be lodged
with support of the LCC to the PMU. The AH must lodge
the complaint within 1 month of lodging the original
complaint with the LAC and must produce documents
supporting his/her claim. The PMU will provide the
decision within 21 days of registering the complaint.
The PMU decision must be in compliance with this
LARF provisions.
4. Should the grievance redress system fail to
satisfy the AH, they can further submit their case to
the appropriate court of law as per the process set
out in Sections 18 to 22 of the LAA (1894).
4. Should the grievance redress system fail to satisfy
the AH, they can further submit their case to the
appropriate court of law as per the process set out in
Sections 18 to 22 of the LAA (1894).
LARP D.G. Khan 500kV Subproject – Final Draft November 2007
Page 32
Power Transmission Enhancement Program
8.
BUDGET FOR LAND AND ASSET ACQUISITION
8.1
Basis for Compensation
102.
Compensation for projects requiring land acquisition can often differ between the
borrower and ADB (and other providers of official development assistance). To
comply with ADB’s Policy on Involuntary Resettlement, rates used to compensate
for lost crops and trees must be replacement cost at current market value, in order
to meet the policy objective of “at least” restoring people’s livelihoods and ensuring
that people affected by a project are not left worse off.
103.
According to the project’s LARF, replacement cost is the amount of cash or kind
needed to replace an asset in its existing or better condition, and is the value
determined as compensation for the current market price without depreciation or
deduction of the costs of any transaction or for any material salvaged. The
processes for establishing the rates used for this Subproject followed the
methodology set out in the project’s LARF.
8.2
Determining the Rate of Land for Substation
104.
During the process of field surveys, an appraisal of crop and tree values and
incomes was carried out in villages affected by the TL corridor. Actual current
market prices of the crops (wheat and cotton), fruits (dates and mango) and wood,
were collected from the eight groups during the consultation meetings, verified in the
market of D. G. Khan, and then an average was computed for both the seasonal
crops (wheat and cotton) and all the types of fruit and wood trees affected by the
Subproject.
8.3
Determining the Rates for Compensation
105.
The average prices and incomes were inflated by 10% to accommodate price
fluctuations in the market between preparation of the LARP and the actual
implementation of this LARP, which may be a period of one to two years. Based on
the foregoing requirements and the LARF provisions, the methodology for assessing
unit compensation values of the different items is described as follows:
106.
•
Basic annual crop compensation was valued at net farm-gate market rates.
If additional crops compensation is due it will be calculated at market value
minus inputs. As noted earlier, compensation for crops affected by tower
bases and perimeters is three-crop and for stringing of the lines is for onecrop; and
•
Fruit trees were valued based on age and productivity category (a. seedling;
b. not yet productive; c. productive). Productive fruit trees were valued at
gross market value of one year’s income multiplied by 10 years, the number
of years needed to grow a new tree with the productive potential of the lost
tree. Wood trees were valued based on wood’s market price by type, size,
and age (dimensions rather than productivity). AHs are entitled to keep the
wood (as salvaged material) without any deductions from the amount of
compensation.
The valuation survey registered recent current crop and tree sales at markets and
was based on AH and community consultation (including relevant local government
agencies). The conclusion of the survey is that in most cases the actual transaction
values are higher than the values officially documented and registered. The results
of the survey are provided in the tables below (Tables 8.1 to 8.5).
LARP D.G. Khan 500kV Subproject – Final Draft November 2007
Page 33
Power Transmission Enhancement Program
Table 8.1: Average Crop Income in Subproject Area
Affected Crop
Net Crop Income (Rs.)
No.
Crop
Per Acre
Per Ha
Per m2
1
Cotton (Kharif Season)
42,800.00
105,716.00
10.57
2
Wheat (Rabi Season)
28,400.00
70,148.00
7.01
3
Maize/Fodder (Both)
34,700.00
85,709.00
8.57
Sum Total:
105,900.00
261,573.00
26.16
Average:
35,300.00
87,191.00
8.72
Table 8.2: Categorization and Income Replacement Values of Affected Fruit Trees
Name of
No.
1
2
Categorization
No. of Fruit
Potential for Fruiting
Income
Affected
Maturity
Age
Harvests
Period
Annual
Replacement
Fruit Tree
Level
(Years)
Per Year
(Years)
Income (Rs)
Value (Rs.)
Date Palm
Mango
Immature
< 10
0
15
1,000
15,000
Mature-1
10 - 20
1
10
1,000
10,000
Mature-2
> 20
1
5
700
3,500
Immature
< 08
0
12
1,700
20,400
Mature-1
08 - 16
1
8
1,700
13,600
Mature-2
>16
1
4
1,200
4,800
Table 8.3: Number and Compensation of Affected Fruit Trees by Productivity
Name of
No.
1
Affected Fruit Trees (No.)
Category
Fruit Tree
Date Palm
Mango
Sub-total (b): Mango
TOTAL:
LineB
LineD
Total
Compensation
Total Price
Rate (Rs.)
(Rs.)
Immature
11
3
21
35
15,000
525,000
Mature-1
8
6
29
43
10,000
430,000
Mature-2
5
7
20
32
3,500
112,000
24
16
70
110
-
1,067,000
Immature
0
0
1
1
20,400
20,400
Mature-1
0
2
5
7
13,600
95,200
Mature-2
0
1
3
4
4,800
19,200
0
3
9
12
-
134,800
24
19
79
122
-
1,201,800
Sub-total (a): Date-Palm
2
LineA
LARP D.G. Khan 500kV Subproject – Final Draft November 2007
Page 34
Power Transmission Enhancement Program
Table 8.4: Relative Sizes of Affected Wood Trees by Size
Name of
Wood Tree
Small
Height (m)
Medium
Girth (m)
Height (m)
Large
Girth (m)
Height (m)
Girth (m)
Shisham
<3.8
<0.5
3.9 - 7.6
0.5 - 0.9
>7.7
>1.0
Eucalyptus
<4.6
<0.3
4.6 - 9.1
0.4 - 0.5
>9.1
>0.5
Kikar
<3.0
<0.5
3.1 - 6.1
0.5 - 0.9
>6.1
>1.0
Mulberry
<3.0
<0.5
3.1 - 6.1
0.5 - 0.9
>6.1
>1.0
Sirin/Saras
<3.8
<0.5
3.9 - 7.6
0.5 - 0.9
>7.7
>1.0
Table 8.5: Number and Compensation of Affected Wood Trees by Size
No.
Name of
Relative
Wood Tree
Size
Affected Wood Tree (No.)
Total Price
(Rs.)
(Rs.)
Line A
Line B
Line D
8
5
34
47
4,500
211,500
10
6
72
88
6,000
528,000
7
3
15
25
8,000
200,000
25
14
121
160
-
939,500
Small
1
4
3
8
3,000
24,000
Medium
3
2
11
16
4,000
64,000
Large
0
2
2
4
6,000
24,000
4
8
16
28
-
112,000
Small
4
3
14
21
3,000
63,000
Medium
3
7
19
29
5,000
145,000
Large
2
1
4
7
7,000
49,000
9
11
37
57
-
257,000
Small
2
0
17
19
2,500
47,500
Medium
1
3
32
36
4,000
144,000
Large
3
1
3
7
6,000
42,000
6
4
52
62
-
233,500
Small
6
5
32
43
2,500
107,500
Medium
5
5
43
53
4,500
238,500
Large
3
2
12
17
6,000
102,000
Sub-total (e): Sirin/Saras
14
12
87
113
-
448,000
TOTAL:
44
37
226
420
-
1,990,000
1
Shisham
Small
Medium
Large
Sub-total (a): Shisham
2
Eucalyptus
Sub-total (b): Eucalyptus
3
Kikar (Acasia)
Sub-total (c): Kikar (acasia)
4
Mulberry
Sub-total (d): Mulberry
5
107.
Sirin/Saras
Total
Market Rate
Crop compensation will be split into categories; (i) crops affected up to three times
by construction of towers (i.e. preparation of foundations, erection of towers and
stringing of power cables) will require compensation to the value of three crops to be
paid to 39 AHs; and, (ii) crops affected by stringing of power cables in the TL
corridor will require compensation for one crop compensation. Compensation for
fruit trees has been assessed on the basis of current market value of the fruit
multiplied by 10 years, and the compensation for wood trees is assessed on the
basis of current market value of the wood.
LARP D.G. Khan 500kV Subproject – Final Draft November 2007
Page 35
Power Transmission Enhancement Program
8.4
Budget for Land and Asset Acquisition
104.
The following discussion and budget is inclusive of the land to be acquired from the
Provincial Government for the Sub-Station. The price for the 41 ha will be negotiated
following the constitution of a Land Valuation Committee to be established for this
purpose, under the Chairmanship of the Executive District Officer (Revenue), D. G.
Khan District. However, based on prevalent market prices of lands in the adjacent
rural areas of D. G. Khan district, especially the villages to be affected by the
transmission line, a total cost has been estimated for the planning purposes at Pak.
Rs. 50.64 million (US$ 830,000).
105.
This LARP addresses the resettlement cost estimate of the TL component of the
Subproject and includes the cost of compensation for affected crops and trees,
rehabilitation of lands and watercourses which may get partially damaged during the
field operations, and other restoration/assistance entitlements of the 64 AHs only,
and other associated costs. The cost estimates have been based on the rates
derived through consultation and surveys as described in Section 8.2. The rates for
compensation and cash entitlements for rehabilitation as well as allowances payable
to AHs may be adjusted, based on actual annual inflation rate by LARU and NTDC.
106.
The total compensation for crops and trees is Rs. 14.03 million (US$ 230,315), while
Rs. 1.82 million are allocated to other activities, i.e., rehabilitation of lands and
watercourses, technical assistance, and training.
107.
The administrative charges have been estimated as 10% of the total compensation
(Rs. 9.7 million or US$ 159,404). These charges are to cover the costs of
implementing the plan (producing and distributing the PIB, holding individual and
group consultations and public meetings as required, verifying the , revising the
LARP if required (to reflect any minor changes), organizing and arranging for the
compensation payments through the LACs), and internal monitoring of the plan and
its implementation. Further, a contingency of 10% has been included in the cost
estimate, which is Rs. 970,775 (US$ 15,940).
108.
Funds for compensation and implementation of the LARP will be from the
Government (counterpart funds) via NTDC, budgetary requirements for economic
restoration, as part of resettlement budget will also come from the counterpart funds
and shall be identified as allowances. The EMA will be financed as a project loan
cost as a component of the project support fund from ADB.
109.
To sum up, as shown in Table 8.6, the total cost of LARP implementation, including
the cost of the government land to be purchased for the Sub-Station, is estimated at
Rs. 77.22 million or US$ 1.27 million.
LARP D.G. Khan 500kV Subproject – Final Draft November 2007
Page 36
Power Transmission Enhancement Program
Table 8.6: Estimated Cost of D. G. Khan LARP
!
A.1
!
41
!& 0
+
% (
"
!
ha
- . $& , " $% . #
50,642,175
#
!:
%4 #
-
%
' %''
%
542
3
;
,
1
''
"
!
"
! ,- <
> =
!
&
!
#
% (
, - =#
'
, #
,-
, ./
' (
' %
'
%
%
(
%
5#
%
'
,5
'' %
(
! "#
/
0 1 *
)
+
-,
)
+
,
) '
/0
)
&
.?
& @
.?
&
#
!
%
#
(
(
'
(
' %
, $" , " $2 # ,
."
"
,
,
1
!
(
,#
('%
% (
'
1
2&3
!
,
,#
! %4
*
3
/
!0 '
" 1
5 ! 4
.
'
.
'
'
,
$
#
# ,'
- . $& , " $% . #
2 $& # & $& ' ,
,! A ) A #
$
#
,
%
%
& & $( , ' $& - &
$%
&
' ($
$ )*
"+
* US$ 1.00 = Rs. 60.90.
LARP D.G. Khan 500kV Subproject – Final Draft November 2007
Page 37
Power Transmission Enhancement Program
9.
IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE
110.
The overall program will be planned and implemented in a three year period with
Tranche 2 subprojects scheduled to commence upon loan approval. Implementation
of resettlement related activities will take place after the project supervision
consultant has mobilized, who will work closely with and assist NTDC-PMU in all the
resettlement related activities, as described in Table 9.1.
111.
No civil/installation works Contracts will be awarded until this Short LARP has been
approved by both EPA and ADB. Civil works contractors will not be issued a notice
of possession of site for any section of construction works unless NTDC has
satisfactorily completed, in accordance with the approved LARP, and compensation
payments have been made and the area required is free of all encumbrances.
Moreover, NOCs from concerned agencies will also be obtained prior to start of
installation works.
112.
The LARP implementation schedule, shown below, envisages the following
sequence of activities; some of these steps will overlap in their timing and some will
be repeated throughout the project schedule.
LARP D.G. Khan 500kV Subproject – Final Draft November 2007
Page 38
Power Transmission Enhancement Program
Table 9.1: Implementation Schedule for D. G. Khan Subproject
3
5
*
+B +
!
+B 3
5#
,
)
+B )
7
!/ 1 ,
#
*
+
+ D
B
*
"
+ D
3+ *
"
-
C
3
2*
&
2 1
+ D
3) ?
" -
@
*
/ 3* + . + )
1
2*
C
E
,
C
,
+
!
5#
5#
F
" -
+
+
/
,
&
. 3)
@
+ 7.+ "
2 &3
; 7
+ 7.+ "
2 &3
; 7
2 &3
; 7
+ 7.+ "
2 &3
; 7
+ 7.+ "
2 &3
; 7
+ 7.+ "
2 &3
; 7
+ 7.+ "
B
+)
&
2 &3
5
G
G
?
1 @
=
=
G
/0
;
+
;
,;
!
1
,
,;
@
C
=
.
- ,
+
,H )
1 /0
*
+
,
F
- ,<
5
6
66
666
+ 7.+ "
+ 7.+ "
; 7
+ 7.+ "
2 &3
; 7
+ 7.+ "
. 3)
; 7
2 &3
+7
/ 3* + . + )
; 7
+ 7. "
; 7
; 7
3+ * .
!
C
+
67
+ " . 3)
; 7
+ 7. "
+
5
666
3)
; 7
,
66
+ 7.+ "
2 &3
2 &3
6
3)
2 &3
,
"
,
+
; 7
2 &3
*
(##2 4 * *
+ 7.+ "
; 7
2 &3
/
/ 3* + . + ) &
6
; 7
2 &3 . ; 7
!
*
2 &3
2 &3
; - ,<
+
*
3+ * .
3
(##" 4 * *
(##&
1
1I
,
5#
!
5#
.2
* #
,
+ .
+ 7. "
2 &3
; 7
/;
+ 7.+ "
+ 7.+ "
2 &3
; 7
2 &3
; 7
.
,
; 7
3)
2 &3
1
+ 7.+ "
+ 7.+ "
+ 7.+ "
/;
.
+7
LARP D.G. Khan 500kV Subproject – Final Draft November 2007
2 & 3 . 3)
Page 39
67
Power Transmission Enhancement Program
10.
MONITORING AND EVALUATION
113.
Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) are critical activities in involuntary resettlement
caused by various infrastructure development projects, like this power transmission
enhancement project. Monitoring involves periodic checking to ascertain whether
activities are progressing as per schedule while evaluation is essentially a summing
up, at the end of the project, assessment of actual achievement in comparison to
those aimed at during the implementation. RP implementation will be monitored both
internally as well as externally.
114.
The NTDC-PMU through LARU will be responsible for the internal monitoring
through PIU or field office. The Resettlement Specialist will provide necessary
technical assistance in implementing and monitoring the resettlement activities. In
addition, a part-time Consultant will be responsible for independent external
monitoring and evaluation of the resettlement activities.
10.1
Internal Monitoring
115.
This Short LARP includes indicators and benchmarks for achievement of the
objectives under the resettlement program, which can be categorized as follows:
•
Process indicators, which include project inputs, expenditures, staff
deployment;
•
Output indicators are results in terms of numbers of affected persons
compensated for their affected assets (land, crops and/or trees), and,
•
Impact indicators related to the long-term effect of the project on people’s
lives in the project-affected area.
116.
The first two types of indicators, related to process and immediate outputs and
results, will be monitored internally by LARU. This information will be collected from
the project site and assimilated in the form of a monthly progress report to assess
the progress and results of LARP implementation, and adjust the work program,
where necessary, in case of any delays or problems.
117.
Specific activities under LARP implementation to be monitored are the following:
118.
•
Information campaign and consultation with AHs on a continued basis;
•
Status of land acquisition/purchase and payments of crop and tree
compensations;
•
Status of restoration of damaged community infrastructure (water pipelines,
irrigation channels / watercourses, drains, roads, streets, etc.)
•
Grievances redress activities
The LARU will be responsible for monitoring the day-to-day resettlement activities of
the subproject. The socio-economic census and land acquisition data will provide
the necessary benchmark for field level monitoring, to be carried out through:
•
Review of IOL/Census information for all AHs;
•
Consultation and informal interviews with AHs;
•
In-depth case studies;
•
Informal sample survey of AHs;
•
Key informant interviews; and
LARP D.G. Khan 500kV Subproject – Final Draft November 2007
Page 40
Power Transmission Enhancement Program
•
Community public meetings.
119.
A performance data sheet will be developed to monitor the project at the field level.
Quarterly reports will be received from the field offices and LAC/GSC will be
responsible for overall project level monitoring.
10.2
External Monitoring
120.
As stated in Section 5 (Institutional Arrangements), an individual consultant,
consulting firm, or NGO will be engaged on a part-time basis to carry out
independent monitoring and evaluation of the LARP implementation (see TOR in
Appendix 4). Independent evaluation will be undertaken during and after the LARP
implementation and upon completion of the Subproject. The EMA will be selected by
NTDC/PMU with advice and concurrence of ADB. The NTDC is to complete the
hiring process and commence EMA services during the third quarter of the next year
(July-September 2008).
121.
The EMA will review the status of the resettlement implementation in light of the
targets, budget and duration that has been laid down in this short LARP. The key
tasks during external monitoring include:
•
Review and verify internal monitoring reports prepared by LARU;
•
Identification and selection of impact indicators;
•
Impact assessment through formal & informal surveys with the affected
persons;
•
Consultations with AHs, officials, community leaders for review report; and
•
Assessment of the resettlement efficiency, impact and sustainability, and
drawing lessons for future resettlement policy formulation and planning.
10.3
Indicators for Monitoring and Evaluation
122.
The following will be considered as the basis for indicators in monitoring and
evaluation of the subproject’s LARP:
•
Socio-economic conditions of the AHs in the post-resettlement period;
•
Communications and reactions from AHs on entitlements, compensation,
options, alternative developments and relocation timetables etc.;
•
Changes in housing and income levels;
•
Valuation of property;
•
Grievance procedures;
•
Disbursement of compensation; and
•
Level of satisfaction of AHs in the post resettlement period.
10.4
Resettlement Database
123.
All information concerning resettlement issues related to land acquisition, socioeconomic information of the acquired land; inventory of crop and tree losses by
individual AHs, compensation and entitlements and payments will be collected by
LARU and the consultants through their concerned field offices and computerized by
the LARU. This database will form the basis of information for implementation,
monitoring and reporting purposes and facilitate efficient resettlement management.
LARP D.G. Khan 500kV Subproject – Final Draft November 2007
Page 41
Power Transmission Enhancement Program
10.5
Reporting Requirements
124.
The LARU responsible for supervision and implementation of LARP will prepare
monthly progress reports on resettlement activities and submit them to the ADB for
review. The Resettlement Specialist will also monitor LARP implementation
independently and submit quarterly reports to PMU, NTDC and ADB. These
quarterly reports will also highlight the bottlenecks and recommend ways and means
to improve such problematic situations.
125.
The external Consultant will submit bi-annual review reports directly to ADB and
determine whether or not resettlement goals have been achieved, more importantly
whether livelihoods and living standards have been restored/enhanced and suggest
suitable recommendations for improvement. S/he will also provide a copy of the
same report to NTDC Headquarters for information and successive action.
LARP D.G. Khan 500kV Subproject – Final Draft November 2007
Page 42
Power Transmission Enhancement Program
APPENDICES
Appendix 1 – Working Tables
Appendix 2 – List of People Consulted for LARP
Appendix 3 – Draft Public Information Brochure
Appendix 4 – Terms of Reference for External Monitoring Consultant/NGO
LARP D.G. Khan 500kV Subproject – Final Draft November 2007
Page 43
Power Transmission Enhancement Program
Appendix 1 – Working Tables
Table A-1: Land Affected by Construction of 500kV Transmission Lines under D.G.
Khan Subproject
Working Table A-1: Land Affected by Construction of 500kV Transmission Lines under D.G. Khan Subproject
Affected Private Land (Crop Compensation: Towers: 3 Crops; TL Corridor: 1 Crop)
Affected Government Land (No Compensation)
Land Under Towers
Tower Nos.
Distance
TL Corridor (50m wide)
Total Land
(Public Infrastructure: Length x 50m Width))
Sq. Meters Hectares
Tower No. Land (m2)
(From-To)
(Meters)
Length (m) Area (m2)
Description
Length
Area (m2) Area (ha)
A: Incoming Single Circuit New Transmission Line (From 500kV Guddu-Multan Transmission Line):
13,953
1.40 A-1
2,500
A 1-2
254.05
229.05
11,453
15,500
1.55 Rajanpur Road
A-2
2,500
A 2-3
320.00
260.00
13,000
10.00
500
0.05
14,400
1.44 A-3
2,500
A 3-4
288.00
238.00
11,900
14,000
1.40 A-4
2,500
A 4-5
280.00
230.00
11,500
14,000
1.40 A-5
2,500
A 5-6
280.00
230.00
11,500
13,976
1.40 A-6
2,500
A 6 - D 01
279.52
229.52
11,476
A-1 - A-6
15,000 sub-total (a):
1,701.57
1,416.57
70,828.50
85,829
8.58 10.00
500
0.05
B: Outgoing Single Circuit Line (To 500kV Guddu-Multan Transmission Line):
13,887
1.39 B-1
2,500
D 01 - B 1
277.73
227.73
11,387
15,000
1.50 B-2
2,500
B1-2
300.00
250.00
12,500
13,216
1.32 Village Road
B-3
2,500
B2-3
270.31
214.31
10,716
6.00
300
0.03
17,000
1.70 B-4
2,500
B3-4
340.00
290.00
14,500
14,000
1.40 B-5
2,500
B4-5
280.00
230.00
11,500
11,404
1.14 B-6
2,500
B5-6
203.08
178.08
8,904
B-1 - B-6
15,000 sub-total (b):
1,671.12
1,390.12
69,506.00
84,506
8.45 6.00
300
0.03
D: Double Circuit (Incoming & Outgoing Lines to Grid Station):
17,500
1.75 D 01
2,500
D 01 - 02
350.00
300.00
15,000
17,100
1.71 Aaliwala Road
D 02
2,500
D 02 - 03
350.00
292.00
14,600
8.00
400
0.04
17,500
1.75 D 03
2,500
D 03 - 04
350.00
300.00
15,000
17,552
1.76 D 04
2,500
D 04 - 05
351.04
301.04
15,052
14,700
1.47 Village Road
D 05
2,500
D 05 - 06
300.00
244.00
12,200
6.00
300
0.03
15,000
1.50 D 06
2,500
D 06 - 07
300.00
250.00
12,500
14,300
1.43 Indus Highway (N-55)
64.00
3,200
0.32
D 07
2,500
D 07 - 08
350.00
236.00
11,800
17,500
1.75 D 08
2,500
D 08 - 09
350.00
300.00
15,000
19,000
1.90 D 09
2,500
D 09 - 10
380.00
330.00
16,500
16,500
1.65 Ishoria Canal
D 10
2,500
D 10 - 11
350.00
280.00
14,000
20.00
1,000
0.10
17,500
1.75 D 11
2,500
D 11 - 12
350.00
300.00
15,000
18,000
1.80 D 12
2,500
D 12 - 13
360.00
310.00
15,500
18,879
1.89 D 13
2,500
D 13 - 14
377.57
327.57
16,379
16,700
1.67 Raliway Track
D 14
2,500
D 14 - 15
350.00
284.00
14,200
16.00
800
0.08
15,000
1.50 D 15
2,500
D 15 - 16
300.00
250.00
12,500
17,500
1.75 D 16
2,500
D 16 - 17
350.00
300.00
15,000
13,400
1.34 Village Road + Canal
D 17
2,500
D 17 - 18
300.00
218.00
10,900
32.00
1,600
0.16
13,000
1.30 D 18
2,500
D 18 - 19
260.00
210.00
10,500
16,300
1.63 Drain + Minor Canal
D 19
2,500
D 19 - 20
350.00
276.00
13,800
24.00
1,200
0.12
17,000
1.70 D 20
2,500
D 20 - 21
340.00
290.00
14,500
17,500
1.75 D 21
2,500
D 21 - 22
350.00
300.00
15,000
17,811
1.78 D 22
2,500
D 22 - 23
356.22
306.22
15,311
17,100
1.71 Choti Road
D 23
2,500
D 23 - 24
350.00
292.00
14,600
8.00
400
0.04
16,500
1.65 D 24
2,500
D 24 - 25
330.00
280.00
14,000
16,900
1.69 Minor Canal
D 25
2,500
D 25 - 26
350.00
288.00
14,400
12.00
600
0.06
17,500
1.75 D 26
2,500
D 26 - 27
350.00
300.00
15,000
12,900
1.29 Minor Canal
D 27
2,500
D 27 - 28
270.00
208.00
10,400
12.00
600
0.06
15,921
1.59 D 28
2,500
D 28 - 29
318.41
268.41
13,421
16,600
1.66 Drain
D 29
2,500
D 29 - 30
350.00
282.00
14,100
18.00
900
0.09
17,500
1.75 D 30
2,500
D 30 - 31
350.00
300.00
15,000
17,000
1.70 D 31
2,500
D 31 - 32
340.00
290.00
14,500
17,500
1.75 D 32
2,500
D 32 - 33
350.00
300.00
15,000
15,000
1.50 D 33
2,500
D 33 - 34
300.00
250.00
12,500
17,500
1.75 D 34
2,500
D 34 - 35
350.00
300.00
15,000
17,500
1.75 D 35
2,500
D 35 - 36
350.00
300.00
15,000
16,500
1.65 D 36
2,500
D 36 - 37
330.00
280.00
14,000
15,425
1.54 D 37
2,500
D 37 - 38
308.49
258.49
12,925
16,750
1.68 Minor Canal
D 38
2,500
D 38 - 39
350.00
285.00
14,250
15.00
750
0.08
17,500
1.75 D 39
2,500
D 39 - 40
350.00
300.00
15,000
16,900
1.69 Rural Access Road
D 40
2,500
D 40 - 41
350.00
288.00
14,400
12.00
600
0.06
16,500
1.65 Canal Distributary
D 41
2,500
D 41 - 42
360.00
280.00
14,000
30.00
1,500
0.15
18,000
1.80 D 42
2,500
D 42 - 43
360.00
310.00
15,500
18,000
1.80 D 43
2,500
D 43 - 44
360.00
310.00
15,500
17,336
1.73 D 44
2,500
D 44 - 45
346.72
296.72
14,836
14,000
1.40 D 45
2,500
D 45 - 46
280.00
230.00
11,500
17,500
1.75 D 46
2,500
D 46 - 47
350.00
300.00
15,000
8,450
0.85 D.G.& Kachhi Canals
D 47
2,500
D 47 - 48
290.00
119.00
5,950
121.00
6,050
0.61
4,350
0.44 Govt. Rangeland
D 48
2,500
D 48 - 49
290.00
37.00
1,850
203.00
10,150
1.02
D 49
D 49 - 50
287.44
Govt. Rangeland
237.44
11,872
1.19
D 50
D 50 - 51
260.00
Govt. Rangeland
210.00
10,500
1.05
D 51
D 51 - 52
273.55
Govt. Rangeland
223.55
11,178
1.12
D 52
D 52 - 55
270.00
Govt. Rangeland
220.00
11,000
1.10
D 55
D 55 - End
60.00
Govt. Rangeland
10.00
500
0.05
D 01-55
120,000 sub-total (c): 17,309.44
13,157.45
657,873
777,873
77.79 1,502
75,100
7.51
A 1-D 55
TOTAL
20,682
15,964
Total Affected Land (Towers+Line):
150,000
1,098,207
109.82
798,207
LARP D.G. Khan 500kV Subproject – Final Draft November 2007
948,207
94.82
-
1,518
75,900
7.59
Page 44
Power Transmission Enhancement Program
Table A-2: List of Affected Farmers by New Towers and Transmission Line for 500kV
Sub-Station at D. G. Khan
Name of
Parent
Tower (50mx50m)
T. Line (50m Wide)
No. Name of Affected Farmer (HHH) Village/Hamlet Village Tower No. Number Area (m2) Length (m) Area (m2)
(A) Incoming Single Circuit Transmission Line (Existing 500kV Transmission Line to First Double Circuit Tower):
1 Ghulam Farid s/o Muma Khan
Qureshiwala Aaliwala A-1
1
2,500
209.05
10,453
2 Abdul Aziz s/o Khan Mohd
Qureshiwala Aaliwala A-2
1
2,500
157.00
7,850
3 Jamal Mohamad s/o Deen M.
Samundriwala Aaliwala A-2 - A-3
0
96.00
4,800
4 Allah Wasaya s/o Gul Mohd
Samundriwala Aaliwala A-2 - A-3
0
67.00
3,350
5 Ghulam Mohd s/o Mawa Khan
Samundriwala Aaliwala A-2 - A-3
0
87.00
4,350
6 Fateh Karim s/o Allah Wasaya
Shahwala
Aaliwala A-2 - A-3
0
65.00
3,250
7 Nazir Ahmad s/o Fateh Deen
Shahwala
Aaliwala A-3
1
2,500
131.00
6,550
8 Abdul Karim s/o Khair Mohd
Shahwala
Aaliwala A-3 - A-4
0
124.00
6,200
9 Ghaus Bux s/o Mohd Eisa
Shahwala
Aaliwala A-4
1
2,500
163.00
8,150
10 Ahmad Khan s/o Faiz Mohd
Aliwala
Aaliwala A-4 - A-5
0
74.00
3,700
11 Saifullah Khan s/o Faiz Mohd
Madanwal
Aaliwala A-5 + A-6
2
5,000
216.52
10,826
12 Haji M. Sharif s/o Gh. Haider
Madanwal
Aaliwala A-6 - D-01
1
2,500
27.00
1,350
A-1 - D-01
7
17,500
1,416.57
70,829
Sub-Total (a): Incoming Line:
(B) Outgoing Single Circuit Transmission Line (First Double Circuit Tower to Existing 500kV Transmission Line):
13 Javed s/o Ghulam Qadir
Madanwal
Aaliwala D 01 - B-1
0
48.50
2,425
14 Ismail Khan s/o Mohd Khan
Madanwal
Aaliwala D 01 - B-1
0
96.00
4,800
15 Ishaq Khan s/o Jamal Khan
Madanwal
Aaliwala B-1
1
2,500
86.62
4,331
16 Abdul Rahim s/o Gh. Hasan
Kot Chhota
Aaliwala B-2
1
2,500
272.00
13,600
17 Mian Zaman s/o Mian Tufail
Kot Chhota
Aaliwala B-3 + B-4
2
5,000
512.00
25,600
18 Mohd Ajmal s/o Ahmad Bux
Sherwala
Aaliwala B-5
1
2,500
197.00
9,850
19 Khuda Bux s/o Ahmad Bux
Sherwala
Aaliwala B-6
1
2,500
178.00
8,900
D 01 - B-6
6
15,000
1,390.12
69,506
Sub-Total (b): Outgoing Line:
(D) New Double Circuit Transmission Line (Incoming/Outgoing Transmission Line to New 500kV Grid Station):
20 Elahi Bux s/o Allah Bux
Madanwala
Aaliwala D 02
1
2,500
267.00
13,350
21 Allah Devia s/o Elahi Bux
Gabulwala
Aaliwala D 03
1
2,500
324.04
16,202
22 Rahmat Khosa s/o Khurshid
Gabulwala
Aaliwala D 04 - D 07
4 10,000
982.00
49,100
D 08
23 Altaf Muhasjir s/o Mubarik Ali
Banglewala
Paigan
1
2,500
137.00
6,850
24 Ghluam Haider s/o Gh. Rasool
Banglewala
Paigan
D 08 - D 09
0
83.00
4,150
25 Ghulam Akbar s/o Gh Rasool
Banglewala
Paigan
D 08 - D 09
0
62.00
3,100
26 Jind Wada s/o Jamal
Banglewala
Paigan
D 08 - D 09
0
68.00
3,400
D 09
27 Amanullah s/o Ghulam Mohd
Banglewala
Paigan
1
2,500
127.00
6,350
28 Iqbal Khan s/o Gamar Khan
Banglewala
Paigan
D 09 - D 10
0
272.00
13,600
D 10
29 Mohd Yaar s/o Gai Khan
Banglewala
Paigan
1
2,500
260.00
13,000
D 11 - D 12
30 Ghulam Haider s/o Jind Wada
Banglewala
Paigan
2
5,000
528.00
26,400
D 13
31 Naseer s/o Imam Bux
Banglewala
Paigan
1
2,500
321.50
16,075
D 14
32 Ghulam Ali s/o Haji Hasan
Paigan
Paigan
1
2,500
324.07
16,204
D 15
33 Rahim Bux s/o Haji Hasan
Paigan
Paigan
1
2,500
112.00
5,600
34 Nasar Khan s/o Haji Hasan
Paigan
Paigan
D 15 - D 16
0
64.00
3,200
35 Amanullah s/o Ramzan
Paigan
Paigan
D 15 - D 16
0
123.00
6,150
D 16
36 Farooq s/o Hamid Khan
Paigan
Paigan
1
2,500
276.00
13,800
37 Wazir s/o Yaar Mohammad
Paigan
Paigan
D 16 - D 17
0
221.00
11,050
D 17 - D 19
38 Bilal Akbar s/o Ghulam Qasim
Paigan
Paigan
3
7,500
584.00
29,200
D 20 - D 22
39 Jan Akhtar s/o Ghulam Qasim
Paigan
Paigan
3
7,500
692.22
34,611
D 23 - D 28
40 Aoun Akhtar s/o Ghulam Qasim Paigan
Paigan
6 15,000
1,039.41
51,971
D 29
41 Zulqarnain s/o Ghulam Qasim
Paigan
Paigan
1
2,500
288.00
14,400
D 30
42 Mohammad Ali s/o Ahmad Khan Godhpur
Gadai
1
2,500
310.00
15,500
43 Kaurha s/o Hayat Sushani
Godhpur
Gadai
D 30 - D 31
0
176.00
8,800
D 31
44 Ghulam Husain s/o Musa Khan
Chit Sarkani
Gadai
1
2,500
206.00
10,300
45 Abdul Karim s/o Musa Khan
Chit Sarkani
Gadai
D 31 - D 32
0
194.00
9,700
46 Ghulam Shabir s/o Mohd Bux
Chit Sarkani
Gadai
D 31 - D 32
0
137.00
6,850
D 32
47 Raheem Sarkani s/o Abdullah
Chit Sarkani
Gadai
1
2,500
278.00
13,900
48 Manzoor Sarkani s/o Mohd Bux
Chit Sarkani
Gadai
D 32 - D 33
0
270.00
13,500
D 33
49 Mohd Husain s/o Elahi Bux
Chit Sarkani
Gadai
1
2,500
187.00
9,350
50 Abbas Khan s/o Gumman Khan
Chit Sarkani
Gadai
D 33 - D 34
0
302.00
15,100
D 34
51 Ibrahim Aliani s/o Sulaiman
Chit Sarkani
Gadai
1
2,500
295.00
14,750
52 Mohd Husain s/o Wali Mohd
Chit Sarkani
Gadai
D 34 - D 35
0
284.00
14,200
D 35 - D 37
53 Mohd Kamal s/o Miru Khan
Chit Sarkani
Gadai
3
7,500
562.49
28,125
D 38
54 Hazara Khan s/o Miru Khan
Chit Sarkani
Gadai
1
2,500
306.00
15,300
D 39 - D 40
55 Kasmia Khan s/o Sangar Khan
Chit Sarkani
Gadai
2
5,000
416.00
20,800
56 Jan Mohammad s/o Sher Khan
Chit Sarkani
Gadai
D 40 - D 41
0
102.00
5,100
57 Elahi Bux s/o Janan Khan
Chit Sarkani
Gadai
D 40 - D 41
0
147.00
7,350
58 Allah Wasaya s/o Sarang Khan
Chit Sarkani
Gadai
D 40 - D 41
0
152.00
7,600
D 41
59 Jalal Khan s/o Miran Khan
Chit Dagar
Gadai
1
2,500
305.00
15,250
D 42
60 Chandi Khan s/o Lal Deen
Chit Dagar
Gadai
1
2,500
308.00
15,400
D
43
D
44
61 Ghulam Haider s/o Sumbal Khan Chit Dagar
Gadai
2
5,000
426.72
21,336
D 45
62 Mohd Eisa s/o Sumbal Khan
Chit Dagar
Gadai
1
2,500
213.00
10,650
D 46
63 Allah Dad Sarkani
Chit Dagar
Gadai
1
2,500
263.00
13,150
D 47 - D 48
64 Abdul Aziz s/o Allah Ditta
Chit Dagar
Gadai
2
5,000
162.00
8,100
D 02 - D 48
47 117,500
13,157.45
657,873
Sub-Total (c): Double Circuit Line:
TOTAL:
(A+B+D)
60 150,000
15,964
798,207
LARP D.G. Khan 500kV Subproject – Final Draft November 2007
Total Affected Area
Sq. Meters Hectares
12,953
10,350
4,800
3,350
4,350
3,250
9,050
6,200
10,650
3,700
15,826
3,850
88,329
1.30
1.04
0.48
0.34
0.44
0.33
0.91
0.62
1.07
0.37
1.58
0.39
8.83
2,425
4,800
6,831
16,100
30,600
12,350
11,400
84,506
0.24
0.48
0.68
1.61
3.06
1.24
1.14
8.45
15,850
18,702
59,100
9,350
4,150
3,100
3,400
8,850
13,600
15,500
31,400
18,575
18,704
8,100
3,200
6,150
16,300
11,050
36,700
42,111
66,971
16,900
18,000
8,800
12,800
9,700
6,850
16,400
13,500
11,850
15,100
17,250
14,200
35,625
17,800
25,800
5,100
7,350
7,600
17,750
17,900
26,336
13,150
15,650
13,100
775,373
948,207
1.59
1.87
5.91
0.94
0.42
0.31
0.34
0.89
1.36
1.55
3.14
1.86
1.87
0.81
0.32
0.62
1.63
1.11
3.67
4.21
6.70
1.69
1.80
0.88
1.28
0.97
0.69
1.64
1.35
1.19
1.51
1.73
1.42
3.56
1.78
2.58
0.51
0.74
0.76
1.78
1.79
2.63
1.32
1.57
1.31
77.54
94.82
Page 45
Power Transmission Enhancement Program
Table A-3: Percentage Affected Land by New Transmission Line for D. G. Khan
Working Table A-3: Percentage Affected Land by New Transmission Line for D. G. Khan Subproject
Name of
Total Farmland
Affected Land
Acres
Hectares Hectares Percentage
No.
Name of Affected Farmer (HHH) Village/Hamlet
(A) Incoming Single Circuit Transmission Line:
1
Ghulam Farid s/o Muma Khan Qureshiwala
50.0
20.24
1.30
6.40
2
Abdul Aziz s/o Khan Mohd
Qureshiwala
42.5
17.21
1.04
6.02
3
Jamal Mohamad s/o Deen M.
Samundriwala
25.0
10.12
0.48
4.74
4
Allah Wasaya s/o Gul Mohd
Samundriwala
25.0
10.12
0.34
3.31
5
Ghulam Mohd s/o Mawa Khan Samundriwala
25.0
10.12
0.44
4.30
6
Fateh Karim s/o Allah Wasaya Shahwala
12.5
5.06
0.33
6.42
7
Nazir Ahmad s/o Fateh Deen
Shahwala
25.0
10.12
0.91
8.94
8
Abdul Karim s/o Khair Mohd
Shahwala
25.0
10.12
0.62
6.13
9
Ghaus Bux s/o Mohd Eisa
Shahwala
42.0
17.00
1.07
6.26
10
Ahmad Khan s/o Faiz Mohd
Aliwala
25.0
10.12
0.37
3.66
11
Saifullah Khan s/o Faiz Mohd
Madanwal
50.0
20.24
1.58
7.82
12
Haji M. Sharif s/o Gh. Haider
Madanwal
25.0
10.12
0.39
3.80
8.83
372.00
150.61
67.79
Sub-Total (a): Incoming Line:
31.00
12.55
0.74
5.65
Average Per Affected Farmer (N=12):
(B) Outgoing Single Circuit Transmission Line:
13
Javed s/o Ghulam Qadir
Madanwal
25.0
10.12
0.24
2.40
14
Ismail Khan s/o Mohd Khan
Madanwal
25.0
10.12
0.48
4.74
15
Ishaq Khan s/o Jamal Khan
Madanwal
25.0
10.12
0.68
6.75
16
Abdul Rahim s/o Gh. Hasan
Kot Chhota
50.0
20.24
1.61
7.95
17
Mian Zaman s/o Mian Tufail
Kot Chhota
96.0
38.87
3.06
7.87
18
Mohd Ajmal s/o Ahmad Bux
Sherwala
50.0
20.24
1.24
6.10
19
Khuda Bux s/o Ahmad Bux
Sherwala
50.0
20.24
1.14
5.63
Sub-Total (b): Outgoing Line:
321.0
130.0
8.45
41.4
Average Per Affected Farmer (N=07):
45.86
18.57
1.21
5.92
(D) Double Circuit Transmission Line:
20
Elahi Bux s/o Allah Bux
Madanwala
75.0
30.36
1.59
5.22
21
Allah Devia s/o Elahi Bux
Gabulwala
75.0
30.36
1.87
6.16
22
Rahmat Khosa s/o Khurshid
Gabulwala
250.0
101.21
5.91
5.84
23
Altaf Muhasjir s/o Mubarik Ali
Banglewala
50.0
20.24
0.94
4.62
24
Ghluam Haider s/o Gh. Rasool Banglewala
25.0
10.12
0.42
4.10
25
Ghulam Akbar s/o Gh Rasool
Banglewala
12.5
5.06
0.31
6.13
26
Jind Wada s/o Jamal
Banglewala
12.5
5.06
0.34
6.72
27
Amanullah s/o Ghulam Mohd
Banglewala
37.5
15.18
0.89
5.83
28
Iqbal Khan s/o Gamar Khan
Banglewala
45.0
18.21
1.36
7.47
29
Mohd Yaar s/o Gai Khan
Banglewala
72.0
29.15
1.55
5.32
30
Ghulam Haider s/o Jind Wada Banglewala
112.5
45.55
3.14
6.89
31
Naseer s/o Imam Bux
Banglewala
82.0
33.20
1.86
5.60
32
Ghulam Ali s/o Haji Hasan
Paigan
120.0
48.58
1.87
3.85
33
Rahim Bux s/o Haji Hasan
Paigan
37.5
15.18
0.81
5.34
34
Nasar Khan s/o Haji Hasan
Paigan
32.5
13.16
0.32
2.43
35
Amanullah s/o Ramzan
Paigan
72.0
29.15
0.62
2.11
36
Farooq s/o Hamid Khan
Paigan
62.5
25.30
1.63
6.44
37
Wazir s/o Yaar Mohammad
Paigan
92.5
37.45
1.11
2.95
38
Bilal Akbar s/o Ghulam Qasim Paigan
145.0
58.70
3.67
6.25
39
Jan Akhtar s/o Ghulam Qasim Paigan
150.0
60.73
4.21
6.93
40
Aoun Akhtar s/o Ghulam Qasim Paigan
250.0
101.21
6.70
6.62
41
Zulqarnain s/o Ghulam Qasim
Paigan
50.0
20.24
1.69
8.35
42
Mohammad Ali s/o Ahmad Khan Godhpur
50.0
20.24
1.80
8.89
43
Kaurha s/o Hayat Sushani
Godhpur
37.5
15.18
0.88
5.80
44
Ghulam Husain s/o Musa Khan Chit Sarkani
50.0
20.24
1.28
6.32
45
Abdul Karim s/o Musa Khan
Chit Sarkani
45.0
18.21
0.97
5.33
46
Ghulam Shabir s/o Mohd Bux
Chit Sarkani
50.0
20.24
0.69
3.38
47
Raheem Sarkani s/o Abdullah
Chit Sarkani
50.0
20.24
1.64
8.10
48
Manzoor Sarkani s/o Mohd Bux Chit Sarkani
62.5
25.30
1.35
5.34
49
Mohd Husain s/o Elahi Bux
Chit Sarkani
45.0
18.21
1.19
6.51
50
Abbas Khan s/o Gumman Khan Chit Sarkani
72.0
29.15
1.51
5.18
51
Ibrahim Aliani s/o Sulaiman
Chit Sarkani
60.0
24.29
1.73
7.10
52
Mohd Husain s/o Wali Mohd
Chit Sarkani
64.0
25.91
1.42
5.48
53
Mohd Kamal s/o Miru Khan
Chit Sarkani
125.0
50.61
3.56
7.04
54
Hazara Khan s/o Miru Khan
Chit Sarkani
75.0
30.36
1.78
5.86
55
Kasmia Khan s/o Sangar Khan Chit Sarkani
150.0
60.73
2.58
4.25
56
Jan Mohammad s/o Sher Khan Chit Sarkani
50.0
20.24
0.51
2.52
57
Elahi Bux s/o Janan Khan
Chit Sarkani
40.0
16.19
0.74
4.54
58
Allah Wasaya s/o Sarang Khan Chit Sarkani
50.0
20.24
0.76
3.75
59
Jalal Khan s/o Miran Khan
Chit Dagar
75.0
30.36
1.78
5.85
60
Chandi Khan s/o Lal Deen
Chit Dagar
62.5
25.30
1.79
7.07
61
Ghulam Haider s/o Sumbal KhanChit Dagar
125.0
50.61
2.63
5.20
62
Mohd Eisa s/o Sumbal Khan
Chit Dagar
62.5
25.30
1.32
5.20
63
Allah Dad Sarkani
Chit Dagar
75.0
30.36
1.57
5.15
64
Abdul Aziz s/o Allah Ditta
Chit Dagar
62.5
25.30
1.31
5.18
3,399.4
1,376.3
77.54
250.20
Sub-Total (c): Double Circuit Line:
Average Per Affected Farmer (N=45):
75.54
30.58
1.72
5.56
SUM TOTAL (a+b+c):
4,092.42
1,656.85
94.82
359.44
Average Per Affected Farmer (N=64):
63.94
25.89
1.48
5.62
LARP D.G. Khan 500kV Subproject – Final Draft November 2007
Page 46
Power Transmission Enhancement Program
Working Table A-4: Type and Table A4: Number of Affected Trees in 500kV DG Khan
Subproject
Working Table A-4: Type and Number of Affected Trees in 500kV DG Khan Subproject
(Within 30m Wide Corridor - Righ of Way)
Fruit Trees
Wood Trees*
Tower Nos.
(From-To)
Dates
Mango Shisham Sirin
Kikar
Toot
Poplar Total No.
A: Incoming Single Circuit Line (From 500kV Guddu-Multan Transmission Line):
A 1-2
1
2
1
4
A 2-3
6
7
2
5
20
A 3-4
9
13
5
27
A 4-5
3
3
2
2
4
14
A 5-6
2
2
2
6
A 6 - D 01
3
2
3
3
11
sub-total (a):
24
0
25
14
9
6
4
82
B: Outgoing Single Circuit Line (To 500kV Guddu-Multan Transmission Line):
D 01 - B 1
4
2
3
3
12
B1-2
3
4
1
2
10
B2-3
4
2
2
3
11
B3-4
4
4
2
10
B4-5
2
3
1
5
11
B5-6
5
3
2
1
3
14
sub-total (b):
16
3
14
12
11
4
8
68
D: Double Circuit (Incoming & Outgoing Lines to Grid Station):
D 01 - 02
4
1
5
2
1
13
D 02 - 03
8
2
5
3
2
20
D 03 - 04
3
3
4
2
2
14
D 04 - 05
1
1
2
D 05 - 06
1
1
1
3
D 06 - 07
3
2
5
D 07 - 08
1
3
2
6
D 08 - 09
3
3
2
2
10
D 09 - 10
3
1
1
5
D 10 - 11
4
5
4
3
16
D 11 - 12
4
6
3
2
15
D 12 - 13
3
9
1
13
D 13 - 14
1
1
2
6
10
D 14 - 15
1
3
2
6
D 15 - 16
1
1
1
3
D 16 - 17
1
2
2
5
D 17 - 18
3
3
1
7
D 18 - 19
4
3
2
2
11
D 19 - 20
1
2
1
3
7
D 20 - 21
2
4
2
1
9
D 21 - 22
5
1
2
8
D 22 - 23
2
3
1
1
7
D 23 - 24
1
1
2
1
5
D 24 - 25
3
1
3
1
8
D 25 - 26
3
3
D 26 - 27
2
1
2
5
D 27 - 28
5
1
6
D 28 - 29
2
3
5
D 29 - 30
1
1
3
2
7
D 30 - 31
3
2
1
6
D 31 - 32
4
4
8
D 32 - 33
2
3
3
2
1
11
D 33 - 34
7
7
D 34 - 35
2
6
2
10
D 35 - 36
4
3
1
8
D 36 - 37
2
7
2
11
D 37 - 38
3
2
5
3
13
D 38 - 39
2
3
2
2
9
D 39 - 40
5
1
2
1
9
D 40 - 41
2
5
3
10
D 41 - 42
3
4
3
1
11
D 42 - 43
2
1
1
3
1
8
D 43 - 44
2
2
2
1
7
D 44 - 45
5
1
2
2
10
D 45 - 46
1
5
1
7
D 46 - 47
1
2
1
1
5
D 47 - 48
2
1
2
5
D 48 - 49**
1
1
1
3
D 49 - 50**
0
D 50 - 51**
0
D 51 - 52**
0
D 52 - 55**
0
D 55 - End**
0
sub-total (c):
70
9
121
87
37
52
16
392
TOTAL (a+b+c):
110
12
160
113
57
62
28
542
* Botanical Names: Shisham = Sisso ; Sirin = Albizia Lebbek ; Kikar = Acacia Nicolta ; Toot = Mulberry .
** 120m from Tower 48 to End is the Govt. Range Land with 25-30% covered by shrub species; No Trees.
LARP D.G. Khan 500kV Subproject – Final Draft November 2007
Page 47
Power Transmission Enhancement Program
Table A-5: Sector-Wise Income of Affected Households
500kV Transmission Line at D. G. Khan Sub-Station
Working Table A-5: Sector-Wise Income of Affected Households 500kV Transmission Line at D. G. Khan Grid Station
Affected Person (AP)
Annual Household Income by Sectors and Gender (Rs. "000")
AP
Employment
Small Business
Agriculture (Net)
Total Income (Rs. "000")
No.
Name of Household Head
Men
Women
Men
Wmn
Men
Wmn
Men
Wmn
Overall
(A) Incoming Single Circuit Transmission Line:
1
Ghulam Farid s/o Muma Khan
36.0
107.5
143.5
143.5
2
Abdul Aziz s/o Khan Mohd
36.0
30.0
84.0
36.0
120.0
66.0
186.0
3
Jamal Mohamad s/o Deen M.
84.0
42.0
84.0
72.0
156.0
4
Allah Wasaya s/o Gul Mohd
24.0
84.0
84.0
24.0
108.0
5
Ghulam Mohd s/o Mawa Khan
72.0
126.0
198.0
198.0
6
Fateh Karim s/o Allah Wasaya
66.0
36.0
12.0
42.0
48.0
108.0
96.0
204.0
7
Nazir Ahmad s/o Fateh Deen
107.5
107.5
107.5
8
Abdul Karim s/o Khair Mohd
24.0
36.0
107.5
107.5
60.0
167.5
9
Ghaus Bux s/o Mohd Eisa
126.0
126.0
126.0
10 Ahmad Khan s/o Faiz Mohd
30.0
66.0
84.0
150.0
30.0
180.0
11 Saifullah Khan s/o Faiz Mohd
48.0
107.5
155.5
155.5
12 Haji M. Sharif s/o Gh. Haider
42.0
126.0
168.0
168.0
Sub-Total (a): Incoming Line:
192.0
120.0
138.0
72.0
1,186.2
126.0
1,408.7
348.0
1,756.7
Sector-Wise Percentage (Men:Wmn):
61.5
38.5
65.7
34.3
90.4
9.6
80.2
19.8
100.0
(B) Outgoing Single Circuit Transmission Line:
13 Javed s/o Ghulam Qadir
45.0
24.0
54.0
42.0
24.0
141.0
48.0
189.0
14 Ismail Khan s/o Mohd Khan
36.0
36.0
50.4
86.4
36.0
122.4
15 Ishaq Khan s/o Jamal Khan
36.0
84.0
18.0
120.0
18.0
138.0
16 Abdul Rahim s/o Gh. Hasan
42.0
141.1
183.1
183.1
17 Mian Zaman s/o Mian Tufail
36.0
252.0
252.0
36.0
288.0
18 Mohd Ajmal s/o Ahmad Bux
107.5
107.5
107.5
19 Khuda Bux s/o Ahmad Bux
30.0
168.0
30.0
198.0
30.0
228.0
Sub-Total (b): Outgoing Line:
87.0
96.0
156.0
845.1
72.0
1,088.1
168.0
1,256.1
Sector-Wise Percentage (Men:Wmn):
47.5
52.5
100.0
92.1
7.9
86.6
13.4
100.0
(D) Double Circuit Transmission Line:
20 Elahi Bux s/o Allah Bux
42.0
161.3
203.3
203.3
21 Allah Devia s/o Elahi Bux
30.0
168.0
168.0
30.0
198.0
22 Rahmat Khosa s/o Khurshid
504.0
504.0
504.0
23 Altaf Muhasjir s/o Mubarik Ali
60.0
15.0
126.0
186.0
24.0
210.0
24 Ghluam Haider s/o Gh. Rasool
75.6
30.0
75.6
30.0
105.6
25 Ghulam Akbar s/o Gh Rasool
30.0
42.0
42.0
72.0
42.0
114.0
26 Jind Wada s/o Jamal
6.0
42.0
36.0
42.0
42.0
84.0
27 Amanullah s/o Ghulam Mohd
42.0
126.0
126.0
42.0
168.0
28 Iqbal Khan s/o Gamar Khan
151.1
151.1
151.1
29 Mohd Yaar s/o Gai Khan
241.9
241.9
241.9
30 Ghulam Haider s/o Jind Wada
378.0
378.0
378.0
31 Naseer s/o Imam Bux
72.0
275.5
347.5
347.5
32 Ghulam Ali s/o Haji Hasan
403.2
403.2
403.2
33 Rahim Bux s/o Haji Hasan
30.0
126.0
126.0
30.0
156.0
34 Nasar Khan s/o Haji Hasan
109.2
109.2
109.2
35 Amanullah s/o Ramzan
241.9
241.9
241.9
36 Farooq s/o Hamid Khan
210.0
210.0
210.0
37 Wazir s/o Yaar Mohammad
36.0
310.8
310.8
36.0
346.8
38 Bilal Akbar s/o Ghulam Qasim
66.0
487.2
553.2
553.2
39 Jan Akhtar s/o Ghulam Qasim
504.0
504.0
504.0
40 Aoun Akhtar s/o Ghulam Qasim
840.1
840.1
840.1
41 Zulqarnain s/o Ghulam Qasim
54.0
151.2
205.2
205.2
42 Mohammad Ali s/o Ahmad Khan
161.3
12.0
161.3
12.0
173.3
43 Kaurha s/o Hayat Sushani
15.0
126.0
126.0
42.0
168.0
44 Ghulam Husain s/o Musa Khan
30.0
168.0
168.0
30.0
198.0
45 Abdul Karim s/o Musa Khan
151.1
18.0
151.1
18.0
169.1
46 Ghulam Shabir s/o Mohd Bux
168.0
168.0
168.0
47 Raheem Sarkani s/o Abdullah
168.0
168.0
168.0
48 Manzoor Sarkani s/o Mohd Bux
210.0
210.0
210.0
49 Mohd Husain s/o Elahi Bux
24.0
12.0
151.1
175.1
36.0
211.1
50 Abbas Khan s/o Gumman Khan
241.9
241.9
241.9
51 Ibrahim Aliani s/o Sulaiman
201.6
201.6
201.6
52 Mohd Husain s/o Wali Mohd
215.1
215.1
215.1
53 Mohd Kamal s/o Miru Khan
42.0
15.0
378.0
420.0
24.0
444.0
54 Hazara Khan s/o Miru Khan
208.3
208.3
208.3
55 Kasmia Khan s/o Sangar Khan
462.0
462.0
462.0
56 Jan Mohammad s/o Sher Khan
126.0
126.0
126.0
57 Elahi Bux s/o Janan Khan
134.4
134.4
134.4
58 Allah Wasaya s/o Sarang Khan
168.0
168.0
168.0
59 Jalal Khan s/o Miran Khan
42.0
210.0
210.0
60.0
270.0
60 Chandi Khan s/o Lal Deen
218.4
218.4
218.4
61 Gh. Haider s/o Sumbal Khan
36.0
310.8
346.8
346.8
62 Mohd Eisa s/o Sumbal Khan
201.6
201.6
201.6
63 Allah Dad Sarkani
12.0
168.0
168.0
12.0
180.0
64 Abdul Aziz s/o Allah Ditta
36.0
24.0
84.0
30.0
120.0
54.0
174.0
Sub-Total (c): Double Circuit Line:
324.0
264.0
138.0
45.0 10,307.5
168.0
10,769.5
564.0
11,333.5
Sector-Wise Percentage (Men:Wmn):
55.1
44.9
75.4
24.6
98.4
1.6
95.0
5.0
100.0
OVERALL TOTAL:
603.0
480.0
432.0
117.0 12,338.8
366.0
13,373.8
963.0
14,336.8
Sector-Wise Percentage (Men:Wmn):
55.7
44.3
78.7
21.3
97.1
2.9
93.3
6.7
100.0
Sector Totals / Averages :
1,083.0
16.92
549.0
8.58 12,704.8
198.5
14,336.8
224.0
Sector Percentages:
7.55
3.83
88.62
100.00
LARP D.G. Khan 500kV Subproject – Final Draft November 2007
Page 48
Power Transmission Enhancement Program
Table A-6: Per Capita Income of Affected Farmers by New 500kV Transmission Line
for D. G. Khan
Working Table A-6: Per Capita Income of Affected Farmers by New 500kV Transmission Line for D. G. Khan
HH Size
Total Income
Per Capita Income (Rs./Person)
No. Name of Affected Farmer (HHH) (Persons) (Rs./HH/Year)
Annual
Monthly
Daily
(A) Incoming Single Circuit Transmission Line:
1
Ghulam Farid s/o Muma Khan
11
143,530
13,048
1,087
35.75
2
Abdul Aziz s/o Khan Mohd
12
186,008
15,501
1,292
42.47
3
Jamal Mohamad s/o Deen M.
13
156,008
12,001
1,000
32.88
4
Allah Wasaya s/o Gul Mohd
9
108,008
12,001
1,000
32.88
5
Ghulam Mohd s/o Mawa Khan
14
198,012
14,144
1,179
38.75
6
Fateh Karim s/o Allah Wasaya
12
204,004
17,000
1,417
46.58
7
Nazir Ahmad s/o Fateh Deen
8
107,530
13,441
1,120
36.83
8
Abdul Karim s/o Khair Mohd
14
167,530
11,966
997
32.78
9
Ghaus Bux s/o Mohd Eisa
10
126,012
12,601
1,050
34.52
10
Ahmad Khan s/o Faiz Mohd
12
180,008
15,001
1,250
41.10
11
Saifullah Khan s/o Faiz Mohd
11
155,530
14,139
1,178
38.74
12
Haji M. Sharif s/o Gh. Haider
10
168,012
16,801
1,400
46.03
Sum Total (a):
136
1,900,194
167,644
13,970
459.30
Average (a):
11.33
158,350
13,970
1,164.20
38.27
(B) Outgoing Single Circuit Transmission Line:
13
Javed s/o Ghulam Qadir
12
188,998
15,750
1,312
43.15
14
Ismail Khan s/o Mohd Khan
9
122,405
13,601
1,133
37.26
15
Ishaq Khan s/o Jamal Khan
12
138,008
11,501
958
31.51
16
Abdul Rahim s/o Gh. Hasan
14
183,134
13,081
1,090
35.84
17
Mian Zaman s/o Mian Tufail
16
288,024
18,002
1,500
49.32
18
Mohd Ajmal s/o Ahmad Bux
9
107,530
11,948
996
32.73
19
Khuda Bux s/o Ahmad Bux
17
228,016
13,413
1,118
36.75
Sum Total (b):
89
1,256,115
97,294
8,108
266.56
Average (b):
12.71
179,445
13,899
1,158
38.08
(D) New Double Circuit Transmission Line:
20
Elahi Bux s/o Allah Bux
12
203,296
16,941
1,412
46.41
21
Allah Devia s/o Elahi Bux
11
198,016
18,001
1,500
49.32
22
Rahmat Khosa s/o Khurshid
29
504,049
17,381
1,448
47.62
23
Altaf Muhasjir s/o Mubarik Ali
11
209,994
19,090
1,591
52.30
24
Ghluam Haider s/o Gh. Rasool
9
105,613
11,735
978
32.15
25
Ghulam Akbar s/o Gh Rasool
8
114,004
14,251
1,188
39.04
26
Jind Wada s/o Jamal
5
83,998
16,800
1,400
46.03
27
Amanullah s/o Ghulam Mohd
11
168,012
15,274
1,273
41.85
28
Iqbal Khan s/o Gamar Khan
10
151,143
15,114
1,260
41.41
29
Mohd Yaar s/o Gai Khan
14
241,943
17,282
1,440
47.35
30
Ghulam Haider s/o Jind Wada
19
378,036
19,897
1,658
54.51
31
Naseer s/o Imam Bux
16
347,547
21,722
1,810
59.51
32
Ghulam Ali s/o Haji Hasan
21
403,239
19,202
1,600
52.61
33
Rahim Bux s/o Haji Hasan
11
156,012
14,183
1,182
38.86
34
Nasar Khan s/o Haji Hasan
8
109,211
13,651
1,138
37.40
35
Amanullah s/o Ramzan
13
241,943
18,611
1,551
50.99
36
Farooq s/o Hamid Khan
10
210,020
21,002
1,750
57.54
37
Wazir s/o Yaar Mohammad
18
346,830
19,268
1,606
52.79
38
Bilal Akbar s/o Ghulam Qasim
27
553,247
20,491
1,708
56.14
39
Jan Akhtar s/o Ghulam Qasim
20
504,049
25,202
2,100
69.05
40
Aoun Akhtar s/o Ghulam Qasim
32
840,081
26,253
2,188
71.92
41
Zulqarnain s/o Ghulam Qasim
14
205,215
14,658
1,222
40.16
42
Mohammad Ali s/o Ahmad Khan
10
173,296
17,330
1,444
47.48
43
Kaurha s/o Hayat Sushani
7
167,994
23,999
2,000
65.75
44
Ghulam Husain s/o Musa Khan
9
198,016
22,002
1,833
60.28
45
Abdul Karim s/o Musa Khan
10
169,143
16,914
1,410
46.34
46
Ghulam Shabir s/o Mohd Bux
9
168,016
18,668
1,556
51.15
47
Raheem Sarkani s/o Abdullah
7
168,016
24,002
2,000
65.76
48
Manzoor Sarkani s/o Mohd Bux
10
210,020
21,002
1,750
57.54
49
Mohd Husain s/o Elahi Bux
13
211,143
16,242
1,353
44.50
50
Abbas Khan s/o Gumman Khan
12
241,943
20,162
1,680
55.24
51
Ibrahim Aliani s/o Sulaiman
10
201,619
20,162
1,680
55.24
52
Mohd Husain s/o Wali Mohd
12
215,061
17,922
1,493
49.10
53
Mohd Kamal s/o Miru Khan
18
444,036
24,669
2,056
67.59
54
Hazara Khan s/o Miru Khan
10
208,340
20,834
1,736
57.08
55
Kasmia Khan s/o Sangar Khan
21
462,045
22,002
1,834
60.28
56
Jan Mohammad s/o Sher Khan
6
125,994
20,999
1,750
57.53
57
Elahi Bux s/o Janan Khan
8
134,413
16,802
1,400
46.03
58
Allah Wasaya s/o Sarang Khan
9
167,992
18,666
1,555
51.14
59
Jalal Khan s/o Miran Khan
12
270,020
22,502
1,875
61.65
60
Chandi Khan s/o Lal Deen
10
218,421
21,842
1,820
59.84
61
Ghulam Haider s/o Sumbal Khan
16
346,830
21,677
1,806
59.39
62
Mohd Eisa s/o Sumbal Khan
11
201,619
18,329
1,527
50.22
63
Allah Dad Sarkani
12
180,016
15,001
1,250
41.10
64
Abdul Aziz s/o Allah Ditta
9
174,008
19,334
1,611
52.97
Sum Total (c):
580
11,333,500
857,070
71,422
2,348
Average (c ):
12.89
236,115
17,856
1,488
48.92
Overall Total:
805
14,489,810
1,122,008
93,501
3,074
Overall Average:
12.58
226,403
17,531
1,461
48.03
LARP D.G. Khan 500kV Subproject – Final Draft November 2007
Page 49
Power Transmission Enhancement Program
Table A-01: Land Affected by Construction of 500kV Transmission Lines under D.G. Khan Subproject
Affected Private Land (Crop Compensation: Towers: 3 Crops; TL Corridor: 1 Crop)
Affected Government Land (No Compensation)
Land Under Towers
TL Corridor (50m wide)
Total Land
(Public Infrastructure: Length x 50m Width))
Tower Nos.
Distance
Tower No. Land (m2)
(From-To)
(Meters)
Length (m) Area (m2)
Description
Length
Area (m2) Area (ha)
Sq. Meters Hectares
A: Incoming Single Circuit New Transmission Line (From 500kV Guddu-Multan Transmission Line):
A-1
2,500
A 1-2
254.05
229.05
11,453
13,953
1.40 A-2
2,500
A 2-3
320.00
260.00
13,000
10.00
500
0.05
15,500
1.55 Rajanpur Road
A-3
2,500
A 3-4
288.00
238.00
11,900
14,400
1.44 A-4
2,500
A 4-5
280.00
230.00
11,500
14,000
1.40 A-5
2,500
A 5-6
280.00
230.00
11,500
14,000
1.40 A-6
2,500
A 6 - D 01
279.52
229.52
11,476
13,976
1.40 A-1 - A-6
15,000 sub-total (a):
1,701.57
1,416.57
70,828.50
85,829
8.58 10.00
500
0.05
B: Outgoing Single Circuit Line (To 500kV Guddu-Multan Transmission Line):
B-1
2,500
D 01 - B 1
277.73
227.73
11,387
13,887
1.39 B-2
2,500
B1-2
300.00
250.00
12,500
15,000
1.50 B-3
2,500
B2-3
270.31
214.31
10,716
6.00
300
0.03
13,216
1.32 Village Road
B-4
2,500
B3-4
340.00
290.00
14,500
17,000
1.70 B-5
2,500
B4-5
280.00
230.00
11,500
14,000
1.40 B-6
2,500
B5-6
203.08
178.08
8,904
11,404
1.14 B-1 - B-6
15,000 sub-total (b):
1,671.12
1,390.12
69,506.00
84,506
8.45 6.00
300
0.03
D: Double Circuit (Incoming & Outgoing Lines to Grid Station):
D 01
D 02
D 03
D 04
D 05
D 06
D 07
D 08
D 09
D 10
D 11
D 12
D 13
D 14
D 15
D 16
D 17
D 18
D 19
D 20
D 21
D 22
D 23
D 24
D 25
D 26
D 27
D 28
D 29
D 30
D 31
D 32
D 33
D 34
D 35
D 36
D 37
D 38
D 39
D 40
D 41
D 42
D 43
D 44
D 45
D 46
D 47
D 48
D 49
D 50
D 51
D 52
D 55
D 01-55
350.00
350.00
350.00
351.04
300.00
300.00
350.00
350.00
380.00
350.00
350.00
360.00
377.57
350.00
300.00
350.00
300.00
260.00
350.00
340.00
350.00
356.22
350.00
330.00
350.00
350.00
270.00
318.41
350.00
350.00
340.00
350.00
300.00
350.00
350.00
330.00
308.49
350.00
350.00
350.00
360.00
360.00
360.00
346.72
280.00
350.00
290.00
290.00
287.44
260.00
273.55
270.00
60.00
17,309.44
300.00
292.00
300.00
301.04
244.00
250.00
236.00
300.00
330.00
280.00
300.00
310.00
327.57
284.00
250.00
300.00
218.00
210.00
276.00
290.00
300.00
306.22
292.00
280.00
288.00
300.00
208.00
268.41
282.00
300.00
290.00
300.00
250.00
300.00
300.00
280.00
258.49
285.00
300.00
288.00
280.00
310.00
310.00
296.72
230.00
300.00
119.00
37.00
13,157.45
15,000
14,600
15,000
15,052
12,200
12,500
11,800
15,000
16,500
14,000
15,000
15,500
16,379
14,200
12,500
15,000
10,900
10,500
13,800
14,500
15,000
15,311
14,600
14,000
14,400
15,000
10,400
13,421
14,100
15,000
14,500
15,000
12,500
15,000
15,000
14,000
12,925
14,250
15,000
14,400
14,000
15,500
15,500
14,836
11,500
15,000
5,950
1,850
657,873
17,500
17,100
17,500
17,552
14,700
15,000
14,300
17,500
19,000
16,500
17,500
18,000
18,879
16,700
15,000
17,500
13,400
13,000
16,300
17,000
17,500
17,811
17,100
16,500
16,900
17,500
12,900
15,921
16,600
17,500
17,000
17,500
15,000
17,500
17,500
16,500
15,425
16,750
17,500
16,900
16,500
18,000
18,000
17,336
14,000
17,500
8,450
4,350
777,873
1.75
1.71
1.75
1.76
1.47
1.50
1.43
1.75
1.90
1.65
1.75
1.80
1.89
1.67
1.50
1.75
1.34
1.30
1.63
1.70
1.75
1.78
1.71
1.65
1.69
1.75
1.29
1.59
1.66
1.75
1.70
1.75
1.50
1.75
1.75
1.65
1.54
1.68
1.75
1.69
1.65
1.80
1.80
1.73
1.40
1.75
0.85
0.44
77.79
TOTAL
20,682
15,964
798,207
948,207
94.82
Total Affected Land (Towers+Line):
1,098,207
109.82
A 1-D 55
2,500
D 01 - 02
2,500
D 02 - 03
2,500
D 03 - 04
2,500
D 04 - 05
2,500
D 05 - 06
2,500
D 06 - 07
2,500
D 07 - 08
2,500
D 08 - 09
2,500
D 09 - 10
2,500
D 10 - 11
2,500
D 11 - 12
2,500
D 12 - 13
2,500
D 13 - 14
2,500
D 14 - 15
2,500
D 15 - 16
2,500
D 16 - 17
2,500
D 17 - 18
2,500
D 18 - 19
2,500
D 19 - 20
2,500
D 20 - 21
2,500
D 21 - 22
2,500
D 22 - 23
2,500
D 23 - 24
2,500
D 24 - 25
2,500
D 25 - 26
2,500
D 26 - 27
2,500
D 27 - 28
2,500
D 28 - 29
2,500
D 29 - 30
2,500
D 30 - 31
2,500
D 31 - 32
2,500
D 32 - 33
2,500
D 33 - 34
2,500
D 34 - 35
2,500
D 35 - 36
2,500
D 36 - 37
2,500
D 37 - 38
2,500
D 38 - 39
2,500
D 39 - 40
2,500
D 40 - 41
2,500
D 41 - 42
2,500
D 42 - 43
2,500
D 43 - 44
2,500
D 44 - 45
2,500
D 45 - 46
2,500
D 46 - 47
2,500
D 47 - 48
2,500
D 48 - 49
D 49 - 50
D 50 - 51
D 51 - 52
D 52 - 55
D 55 - End
120,000 sub-total (c):
150,000
LARP D.G. Khan 500kV Subproject – Final Draft November 2007
Aaliwala Road
Village Road
Indus Highway (N-55)
Ishoria Canal
Raliway Track
Village Road + Canal
Drain + Minor Canal
Choti Road
Minor Canal
Minor Canal
Drain
Minor Canal
Rural Access Road
Canal Distributary
D.G.& Kachhi Canals
Govt. Rangeland
Govt. Rangeland
Govt. Rangeland
Govt. Rangeland
Govt. Rangeland
Govt. Rangeland
-
8.00
6.00
64.00
20.00
16.00
32.00
24.00
8.00
12.00
12.00
18.00
15.00
12.00
30.00
121.00
203.00
237.44
210.00
223.55
220.00
10.00
1,502
400
300
3,200
1,000
800
1,600
1,200
400
600
600
900
750
600
1,500
6,050
10,150
11,872
10,500
11,178
11,000
500
75,100
0.04
0.03
0.32
0.10
0.08
0.16
0.12
0.04
0.06
0.06
0.09
0.08
0.06
0.15
0.61
1.02
1.19
1.05
1.12
1.10
0.05
7.51
-
1,518
75,900
7.59
Page 50
Power Transmission Enhancement Program
No.
Appendix 2: List of Participants in Consultation Sessions (LARP - D.G.Khan)
Name of Participant
Status
No.
Name of Participant
Status
Men'
s Groups
Women'
s Groups
Group M-1: Samundriwala, Aaliwala (16 May 07)
1 Ghulam Mohd s/o Mawa Khan
Landowner-AP
2 Fazal Karim s/o Allah Wasaya
Landowner-Other
3 Abdul Aziz s/o Khan Mohd
Landowner-AP
4 Fateh Karim s/o Allah Wasaya
Landowner-AP
5 Abdul Karim s/o Khair Mohd
Landowner-AP
6 Jamal Mohammad s/o Deen M. Landowner-AP
7 Allah Wasaya s/o Gul Mohd
Landowner-AP
8 Ghulam Farid s/o Muma Khan
Landowner-AP
9 Ghaus Bux s/o Mohd Eisa
Landowner-AP
10 Nazir Ahmad s/o Fateh Deen
Landowner-AP
Group M-2: Kot Chhutta Bazar (19 May 07)
11 Mian Zaman s/o Mian Tufail
Landowner-AP
12 Khuda Bux s/o Ahmad Bux
Landowner-AP
13 Allah Devia s/o Elahi Bux
Landowner-AP
14 Haji M. Sharif s/o Gh. Haider
Landowner-AP
15 Saifullah Khan s/o Faiz Mohd
Landowner-AP
16 Hammad Khan s/o Hamid Khan School Teacher
17 Rahmat Khosa s/o Khurshid
Landowner-AP
18 Ismail Khan s/o Mohd Khan
Landowner-AP
19 Ishaq Khan s/o Jamal Khan
Landowner-AP
20 Abdul Rahim s/o Gh. Hasan
Landowner-AP
21 Mohd Akmal s/o Ahmad Bux
Landowner-Other
Group M-3: Banglewala, Paigan (21 May 07)
22 Iqbal Khan s/o Gamar Khan
Landowner-AP
23 Altaf Muhasjir s/o Mubarik Ali
Landowner-AP
24 Jind Wada s/o Jamal
Landowner-AP
25 Ghulam Akbar s/o Gh Rasool
Landowner-AP
26 Ameer Bux s/o Jalal Din
Landowner-Other
27 Amanullah s/o Ghulam Mohd
Landowner-AP
28 Ghluam Haider s/o Gh. Rasool
Landowner-AP
Group M-4: Paigan Village: 22 May 07 (Tuesday)
29 Wazir s/o Yaar Mohammad
Landowner-AP
30 Aoun Akhtar s/o Ghulam Qasim Landowner-AP
31 Ghulam Ali s/o Haji Hasan
Landowner-AP
32 Jan Akhtar s/o Ghulam Qasim
Landowner-AP
33 Nasar Khan s/o Haji Hasan
Landowner-AP
34 Amanullah s/o Ramzan
Landowner-AP
35 Farooq s/o Hamid Khan
Landowner-AP
36 Rahim Bux s/o Haji Hasan
Landowner-AP
37 Bilal Akbar s/o Ghulam Qasim
Landowner-AP
Group M-5: Chit Sarkani, Gadai (23 May 07)
38 Manzoor Sarkani s/o Mohd Bux Paigan
39 Ghulam Shabir s/o Mohd Bux
Godhpur
40 Kaurha s/o Hayat Sushani
Godhpur
41 Ghulam Husain s/o Musa Khan Chit Sarkani
42 Abdul Karim s/o Musa Khan
Chit Sarkani
43 Kasmia Khan s/o Sangar Khan
Chit Sarkani
44 Jan Mohammad s/o Sher Khan Chit Sarkani
45 Chandi Khan s/o Lal Deen
Chit Sarkani
46 Mohd Husain s/o Elahi Bux
Chit Sarkani
-
Group W-1: Aaliwala Village (16 May 07)
1
Huda Bibi
Housewife-AH
2
Amina Begum
Housewife-AH
3
Khalida Parveen
Housewife-AH
4
Shakira Hafiz
School Teacher
5
Umamah Ambrin
Housewife-AH
Group W-2: Paigan Village (21 May 07)
6
Sabahat Jabeen
School Teacher
7
Hamida Begum
Housewife-AH
8
Wajahat Bibi
Housewife-AH
9
Ishrat Fatima
Mid-Wife
10 Abida Parveen
Housewife-AH
11 Nasima Jan
Housewife-AH
12 Hurmat Bibi
Housewife-AH
Group W-3: Chit Sarkani, Gadai (23 May 07)
13 Naheed Akhtar
Housewife-AH
14 Shabnam Ara
Housewife-AH
15 Muhktaran Bibi
Housewife-AH
16 Firdaus Begum
School Teacher
17 Nasim Akhtar
Housewife-AH
18 Parveen Akhtar
Housewife-AH
19 Shehla Ayaz
College Student
20 Rubina Yasmeen
High School Student
21 Wahdat Nisa
Housewife-AH
22 Zahida Khatoon
Housewife-AH
LARP D.G. Khan 500kV Subproject – Final Draft November 2007
Page 51
Power Transmission Enhancement Program
Appendix 3 – Draft Public Information Brochure
Power Transmission Enhancement Program
New D. G. Khan 500 kV Sub-Station & Transmission Line
National Transmission and Dispatch Company
Government of Pakistan
November 2007
Land Acquisition and Resettlement Impacts Compensation/Rehabilitation:
Information Booklet
A
General
1.
The National Transmission and Dispatch Company (NTDC), with assistance from Asian
Development Bank (ADB), is intending to implement the Power Transmission
Enhancement Program (PTEP) which will upgrade and extend the transmission network
to expand the capacity and coverage of the network. The PTEP will be implemented over
five to six years, and will include a number of tranches or groups of subprojects.
2.
The first tranche included some 21 subprojects including three new Sub-Stations,
expansion of existing Sub-Stations, and installation of associated transmission lines; 18
of the subprojects will not cause any resettlement impacts as they entail transformers
being installed within an existing Sub-Station site and no works beyond the existing SubStation site boundaries. There are three subprojects (including D. G. Khan subproject)
that required transmission lines and the installation of the towers for these will require
land acquisition, and the stringing of their lines will mean that crops and trees will be
damaged.
3.
These subprojects include also the D. G. Khan Sub-Station and 500kV Transmission
Line Subproject which will provide additional capacity for the area. The substation will be
constructed on state owned barren land to be acquired from the government. There will
be approximately 21.4km of 500 kV dual circuit transmission lines to connect to the
existing 500 kV Guddu Multan 500 kV transmission line.
4.
The subproject will be implemented in the area where you live starting later in 2007 and
will affect crops and trees in your communities. To compensate and/or rehabilitate these
losses the provisions of relevant Pakistan laws and of the ADB Policy on Involuntary
Resettlement will be adopted. This has included the preparation of a Land Acquisition
and Resettlement Framework (LARF) setting out the basic compensation/rehabilitation
provisions for the PTEP and a Land Acquisition and Resettlement Plan (LARP) providing
data on impacts and affected families and indicating in detail how the impacts will be
LARP D.G. Khan 500kV Subproject – Final Draft November 2007
Page 52
Power Transmission Enhancement Program
compensated or rehabilitated has been prepared for each subproject that requires
temporary disturbance to land and subsequent compensation for crops and trees.
5.
Both the LARF and the LARP in Urdu language will be available for perusal to anyone
interested at the Project Implementation Unit in D. G. Khan district. This booklet
summarizing the provisions of the LARF and the LARP for the D. G. Khan Subproject is
given to all the families whose land, trees and crops and incomes are affected by this
subproject. The objective of this booklet is to inform them of the essential compensation
and rehabilitation policy for the D. G. Khan Subproject and of a number of basic issues
relative to the implementation of the compensation and rehabilitation program.
B.
Principles For Compensation and/or Rehabilitation of Affected Families
Principles for the compensation/rehabilitation of affected people (AHs) by the D. G. Khan
Sub-Station and Transmission Line subproject are:
C.
•
Land acquisition will be avoided and acquisition will only occur where access to,
or use of, an AP’s land is affected;
•
Compensation will guarantee the maintenance of the AHs pre-project living
standards;
•
AHs will be fully informed/consulted on compensation options;
•
AHs’ socio-cultural institutions will be supported and used;
•
Land acquisition provisions will equally apply to women and men;
•
Lack of formal title will not impede rehabilitation of families losing land;
•
Particular attention will be paid to women-headed households and vulnerable
groups;
•
Land acquisition budgets will be included in project costs; and
•
Compensation will be fully provided prior to ground leveling and demolition.
Compensation and Rehabilitation eligibility and entitlements
All families residing in affected areas and holding affected assets or incomes before the
eligibility cut-off date for the project 24th May 2007 (the date of the end of the impact
survey) will be entitled to compensation and/or rehabilitation for their losses. This
provision includes legal owners, sharecroppers and leaseholders and squatters as
detailed in Table 1.
LARP D.G. Khan 500kV Subproject – Final Draft November 2007
Page 53
Power Transmission Enhancement Program
Table A-1: Eligibility and Entitlements Matrix
Farmer/Titleholder
Arable Land
Access is not
restricted and existing
or current land use will
remain unchanged
Leaseholder
(registered or not)
Sharecroppers
(registered or not)
Agricultural workers
Squatters
Farmer/Titleholder
Arable Land
All adverse effects on
land use independent
of severity of impact
Leaseholder
(registered or not)
Sharecroppers
(registered or not)
Agricultural
workers
Squatters
Farmer/Titleholder
Leaseholder
Arable Land
Additional for severe
impacts
(>10% of land loss)
Sharecroppers
(registered or not)
Squatters
Titleholder
Residential/
Commercial
Land
Renter/Leaseholder
Squatters
All relevant APs
(including
squatters)
Houses and
Structures
Crops
Crops affected
All APs (also
squatters)
LARP D.G. Khan 500kV Subproject – Final Draft November 2007
No Land compensation provided that land is
rehabilitated/restored to former quality following completion
of works. Compensation, in cash, for all damaged crops and
trees as per item below
No Land compensation provided that the land is
rehabilitated/restored to former quality following completion
of works. Compensation, in cash, for all damaged crops and
trees as per item below
Compensation, in cash or kind, for all damaged crops/trees
as per item below
Compensation, in cash or kind, for all damaged crops/trees
as per item below
Compensation, in cash or kind, for all damaged crops/trees
as per item below
Land for land compensation with plots of equal value and
productivity to the plots lost; or cash for affected land at
replacement cost based on market value a plus 15%
compulsory acquisition surcharge and free of taxes,
registration, and transfer costs
Renewal of lease in plots of equal value/productivity of plots
lost, or Cash equivalent to market value of gross yield of
affected land for the remaining lease years (up to a
maximum of 3 years).
Cash compensation equal to market value of lost harvest
share once (temporary impact) or twice (permanent impact)
Cash indemnity equal to salary (including portions in kind)
for remaining part of agricultural year.
1 rehabilitation allowance equal to market value of 1 gross
harvest (additional to crop compensation) for land use loss.
1 severe impact allowance equal to market value of gross
harvest of affected land for 1 year (inclusive of winter and
summer crop and additional to standard crop compensation)
1 severe impact allowance equal to market value of harvest
share (additional to standard crop compensation)
1 severe impact allowance equal to market value of gross
harvest of the affected land for 1 year (inclusive of winter
and summer crop and additional to standard crop
compensation)
Land x land through provision of plots comparable in
value/location to plot lost; or cash for affected land at full
replacement cost free of taxes, registration, transfer costs
plus 15% compulsory acquisition surcharge.
1-3 months allowance
Accommodation in a government resettlement area or a
self-relocation allowance
Cash compensation at replacement rate for affected
structure/other fixed assets free of salvaged materials,
depreciation or transaction costs. For partial impacts full
cash assistance to restore remaining structure.
Crop compensation in cash at full market rate for one
harvest (either winter or summer) by default for impacts
caused by tower bases and perimeter, stringing and access.
All other crop losses will be compensated at market rates
based on actual losses.
Page 54
Power Transmission Enhancement Program
Trees
Trees affected
Business
Employment
Loss of business or
employment
Relocation
Transport, transition
costs
All APs also
squatters)
All APs (including
squatters)
All APs so affected
Community
AP below poverty
line
Vulnerable AP
D.
Cash compensation shall reflect income replacement
Business owner: (i) Cash compensation equal to 1 year
income, if loss permanent; (ii) cash compensation for the
period of business interruption, if loss is temporary.
Worker/employee: lost wages indemnity for the business
interruption period up to a 3 months maximum.
Provision of sufficient allowance to cover transport expenses
and livelihood expenses for one month.
Rehabilitation/substitution of affected structures/utilities (i.e.
mosques, roads, schools etc.
Employment priority in project-related jobs.
Compensation Assessment for Affected Crops and Trees
The following five tables (Tables A-2 to A-6) provide the bases for assessment of compensations
for the affected agricultural crops and fruit and wood trees under this D. G. Khan Subproject.
Table A-2: Average Crop Income in Subproject Area
Affected Crop
Net Crop Income (Rs.)
Crop
No.
Per Acre
Per Ha
Per m2
1
Cotton (Kharif Season)
42,800.00
105,716.00
10.57
2
Wheat (Rabi Season)
28,400.00
70,148.00
7.01
3
Maize/Fodder (Both)
34,700.00
85,709.00
8.57
105,900.00
261,573.00
26.16
35,300.00
87,191.00
8.72
Sum Total:
Average:
Table A-3: Categorization and Income Replacement Values of Affected Fruit Trees
Name of
No.
1
2
Categorization
No. of Fruit
Potential for Fruiting
Income
Affected
Maturity
Age
Harvests
Period
Annual
Replacement
Fruit Tree
Level
(Years)
Per Year
(Years)
Income (Rs)
Value (Rs.)
Date Palm
Mango
Immature
up to 10
0
15
1,000
15,000
Mature-1
10 - 20
1
10
1,000
10,000
Mature-2
above 20
1
5
700
3,500
Immature
up to 08
0
12
1,700
20,400
Mature-1
08 - 16
1
8
1,700
13,600
Mature-2
above 16
1
4
1,200
4,800
LARP D.G. Khan 500kV Subproject – Final Draft November 2007
Page 55
Power Transmission Enhancement Program
Table A-4: Relative Sizes of Affected Wood Trees by Size
Name of
Wood Tree
Small
Height (m)
Medium
Girth (m)
Height (m)
Large
Girth (m)
Height (m)
Girth (m)
Shisham
>3.8
>0.5
3.9 - 7.6
0.5 - 0.9
>7.7
>1.0
Eucalyptus
>4.6
>0.3
4.6 - 9.1
0.4 - 0.5
>9.1
>0.5
Kikar
>3.0
>0.5
3.1 - 6.1
0.5 - 0.9
>6.1
>1.0
Mulberry
>3.0
>0.5
3.1 - 6.1
0.5 - 0.9
>6.1
>1.0
Sirin/Saras
>3.8
>0.5
3.9 - 7.6
0.5 - 0.9
>7.7
>1.0
Table A-6: Number and Compensation of Affected Wood Trees by Size (D. G. Khan)
No.
Name of
Relative
Wood Tree
Size
Affected Wood Tree (No.)
Total Price
(Rs.)
(Rs.)
Line A
Line B
Line D
8
5
34
47
4,500
211,500
10
6
72
88
6,000
528,000
7
3
15
25
8,000
200,000
25
14
121
160
-
939,500
Small
1
4
3
8
3,000
24,000
Medium
3
2
11
16
4,000
64,000
Large
0
2
2
4
6,000
24,000
4
8
16
28
-
112,000
Small
4
3
14
21
3,000
63,000
Medium
3
7
19
29
5,000
145,000
Large
2
1
4
7
7,000
49,000
9
11
37
57
-
257,000
Small
2
0
17
19
2,500
47,500
Medium
1
3
32
36
4,000
144,000
Large
3
1
3
7
6,000
42,000
6
4
52
62
-
233,500
Small
6
5
32
43
2,500
107,500
Medium
5
5
43
53
4,500
238,500
Large
3
2
12
17
6,000
102,000
Sub-total (e): Sirin/Saras
14
12
87
113
-
448,000
TOTAL:
44
37
226
420
-
1,990,000
1
Shisham
Small
Medium
Large
Sub-total (a): Shisham
2
Eucalyptus
Sub-total (b): Eucalyptus
3
Kikar (Acasia)
Sub-total (c): Kikar (acasia)
4
Mulberry
Sub-total (d): Mulberry
5
Sirin/Saras
LARP D.G. Khan 500kV Subproject – Final Draft November 2007
Total
Market Rate
Page 56
Power Transmission Enhancement Program
E.
Some basic QUESTIONS related to the impacts compensation AND
rehabilitation program for the project
Question A - Do we need to have a land title in order to be compensated or
rehabilitated?
Answer: No. Lack of formal legal rights (title) to land does not prevent AHs from
receiving at least rehabilitation assistance. All AHs who were occupying or using the
affected land at the time of the cut-off date (see above) will be entitled to compensation
or at least rehabilitation under the project. Users of land with title or traditional rights (or
who can prove they are legally using the land) who are affected by restricted access to,
or use if, the land will be entitled to compensation for land and any assets on the land
affected. Users of land who do not have title or traditional rights to land will be provided
full compensation for any structures, crops or trees on land affected by the project and if
their access to, or use of, the land is affected, will receive rehabilitation for land losses
either in form of replacement land (if available) or in form of a cash allowance for landuse loss.
Question B - Does compensation apply to my house or structures?
Answer: Yes. Houses and any other structures (small shops, animal sheds, etc) that will
be affected by the project shall be compensated at replacement cost so that owners can
build another structure of the same size and standard.
Question C - What about my crops and trees?
Answer: Your affected crops and trees will also be compensated at current market
value. Compensation for crops will be based on the anticipated harvest at market value,
while compensation for trees will be based on the type, age and productivity of each tree
affected.
Question D – Does the above mean that anybody in your community can claim
compensation or rehabilitation?
Answer: No. The entitled affected families are only those who where residing in project
affected areas and had affected assets at the time the impacts assessment and the
affected people census was carried out. The cut-off-date for eligibility for this subproject
is 14th January 2007 when the impact survey and the affected people census was
completed. Anybody who encroaches into the area after the cut-off-date will not be
entitled to compensation or any other form of resettlement assistance.
Question E - Do we need to vacate and clear the affected properties immediately after
they have been identified as needed by the project?
Answer: No. Clearing the affected areas will only take place AFTER the compensation
or rehabilitation for affected land or other lost assets and the appropriate subsidies have
LARP D.G. Khan 500kV Subproject – Final Draft November 2007
Page 57
Power Transmission Enhancement Program
been provided to you. After the day in which compensation and rehabilitation was
delivered to you, you will then have 1 month to clear the land. If you have not done so
after a month the project will be allowed to enter your ex-property and clear the land for
you.
Question F - If there is any disagreement regarding the way the compensation policy set
up in the LARP has been implemented or any other issue relative to the compensation
and rehabilitation program for the project do we have the right to complain, and if so how
and where?
Answer: Yes. Any AP may file a complaint or grievance.
AHs will first lodge a
complaint with the land acquisition collector and the project implementation unit in D. G.
Khan district. If unanswered within 15 days, the complaint can then be lodged to NTDC’s
project management unit in Lahore. Finally if the grievance is still not settled within 1
month, the AP can seek redress at the appropriate court. The village administrations and
the Land Acquisition Coordination Committee (LACC) composed by senior members of
the AP communities and by their elected representatives will assist the AP in these
cases. The concerned land acquisition coordination committees will properly document
all complaints and resolutions. AHs will be exempted from all taxes, administrative and
legal fees associated with resolving the dispute.
Question G - Who can we contact for more information about the project?
Answer: For further information about the project as a whole, the LARP for the D. G.
Khan Subproject, or if you would like to receive a full copy of the Land Acquisition and
Resettlement Framework for the project, please contact as follows:
NATIONAL TRANSMISSION AND DISPATCH COMPANY
Address: Room No. 140, WAPDA House, Lahore
Phone Number: +92-42-9202414
Contact person: M. Tahir Khan (Manager MTP)
LARP D.G. Khan 500kV Subproject – Final Draft November 2007
Page 58
Power Transmission Enhancement Program
Appendix 4 – Terms of Reference for External Monitoring Consultant/NGO
The part time consultant will be responsible for the external evaluation of the implementation of
the resettlement plan. S/he has the following general tasks:
I.
To review and verify the progress in resettlement implementation as outlined in the
Resettlement Plan/s specific for the project components.
II.
To assess resettlement efficiency, effectiveness, impacts and sustainability, drawing both
on policies and practices and to suggest any corrective measures, if necessary.
A.
1.
Specific Tasks
Design an appropriate set of indicators for gathering and analyzing information on
resettlement impacts; the indicators shall include the following issues:
•
Budget and timeframe regarding land acquisition and crop/tree compensations,
•
Delivery of entitlement packages in a timely and efficient manner,
•
Satisfaction of affected people on entitlements, compensation,
•
Satisfaction of AHs with grievance procedures and outcomes,
•
Socio-economic conditions of the AHs in the post-resettlement period,
•
Level of satisfaction of AHs in the post resettlement period.
2
Review results of internal monitoring and verify claims through random checking at the
field level to assess whether resettlement objectives have been generally met. Involve
the AHs and community groups in assessing the impact of resettlement for monitoring
and evaluation purposes.
3
Conduct both individual and community level impact analysis through the use of formal
and informal surveys, key informant interviews, focus group discussions and community
public meeting to assess the impact of resettlement.
4
Identify the strengths and weaknesses of basic resettlement objectives and approaches,
implementation strategies, including institutional issues, and provides suggestions for
improvements in future resettlement policy making and planning. Directly feedback the
results and recommendations to NTDC/PMU, LAC/GSC and ADB.
B.
Qualifications
A local expert can conduct this independent evaluation. The consultant must have at
least 5 years experience in project monitoring work and a MA in Social Science. The
consultant should have experience in resettlement management and monitoring work in
ADB-financed projects.
LARP D.G. Khan 500kV Subproject – Final Draft November 2007
Page 59
Power Transmission Enhancement Program
C.
Implementation Schedule and Inputs
The expert will be hired for a total period of 30 days for one-time or intermittent input. The
expert is expected to conduct one monitoring mission upon completion of the RP
implementation and submit a post-completion monitoring and evaluation report to
PMU/NTDC and ADB.
D.
Reporting Requirements
The monitoring expert will review the status of the RP implementation in light of the
targets, budget and duration as outlined in the Resettlement Plan for the hydropower
project site. The expert will submit reports to the ADB and PMU after each monitoring
mission and determine the implementation status and quality of resettlement operations
and also assess whether resettlement goals have been achieved. He will suggest
suitable recommendations for improvement.
The external monitoring expert will prepare a Final Report on the subproject’s LARP
monitoring work at the end of the contract period indicating the project performance and
lessons learned for future projects of this kind.
LARP D.G. Khan 500kV Subproject – Final Draft November 2007
Page 60