International Journal for t he Brewing and beverage industry 2/15 | April | Volume 33 | NUREMBERG | www.brauweltinternational.com Chlorine dioxide solutions in the beverage industry BRAUWELT international | Knowledge | Cleaning and disinfection Chlorine dioxide solutions in the beverage industry Corrosive | Use of chlorine dioxide for disinfection of drinking, process and industrial water, for bottle disinfection and for disinfection of plants and plant components has been common practice in beverage production for decades. However, the oxidising disinfectant causes corrosion on metal surfaces. The corrosion behaviour of austenitic chromium-nickel steel 1.4301 (304SS, V2 A) at different concentrations of chlorine dioxide has been investigated in the Dr. Küke GmbH laboratory, Wedemark. A chlorine dioxide solution containing hydrochloric acid and a pH neutral one was used. Results of the investigations as well as a comparison of the two processes used in Hofbrauhaus Wolters, Brunswick, are presented below. The standard process for producing pH neutral chlorine dioxide solutions described in DIN EN 12671 “Chemicals used for treatment of water intended for human consumption – Chlorine dioxide generated in situ” is an alternative to classic chloride dioxide solutions containing hydrochloric acid. Using the sodium peroxodisulphate/chlorite process, 3 g of CIO2/d in 1 l containers up to 3000 g of CIO2/d in 1000 l containers can be made available as packed material. When the process is run continuously, it is currently possible to produce 20.8 g of CIO2/h. lCorrosion tests As in breweries, concentrations of 3 mg of CIO2/l [1] are used to some extent for killing off beer spoilers and up to 6 mg CIO2/l for making up for depletion e.g. caused by conveyor belt lubricants or up to 30 mg of CIO2/l [2] for acid CIP, it is particularly interesting to make a comparison of available solutions in terms of corrosivity. This makes it possible to estimate the life of plants that are disinfected with chlorine dioxide. Figure 1 shows the test arrangement for corrosion testing according to DIN 50905. 750 ml of chlorine dioxide solution are placed in a triple-neck round bottom flask and the test specimen is suspended on a glass hook and immersed 1 cm below the liquid surface. The solution is stirred. A reflux condenser prevents vaporisation of the aqueous part of the solution. Each test is carried out at a temperature of 25 °C. After the tests, the test specimens are freed from corrosion products using a soft brush, washed with water and ethanol and dried with acetone. A total of four tests, each lasting for 120 hours, were carried out (fig. 2 and 3). Table 1 summarises the data resulting from the tests and figures 4 and 5 present them graphically. reflux condenser H2O glass rod with hook thermometer triple-neck round-boom flask ClO2 soluon test specimen srring bar Authors: Maximilian Küke, Dr. Küke GmbH, Wedemark; Tanja Frickmann, Head of Laboratory Hofbrauhaus Wolters GmbH, Brunswick; Dr. Fritz Küke, Managing Director, Dr. Küke GmbH, Wedemark; Germany 2 Brauwelt international | 2015/II Fig. 1 Test arrangement in accordance with DIN 50905 Cleaning and disinfection | Knowledge | BRAUWELT international lUse in the brewery Operational safety in a brewery makes it mandatory that the generator produces the required quantity of chlorine dioxide for several dosage points reliably and failurefree. In order to cover fluctuating chlorine dioxide withdrawals and operational standstill times e.g. at weekends, the chlorine dioxide should ideally be storable for a certain period. The unit should also be user friendly and prevent mistaking the chemicals used for production of chlorine dioxide and connecting them incorrectly to the plant. The unit should also produce a chlorine dioxide solution that, as far as possible, does not contain any, or hardly any, excess chloride. In addition, it should not change or hardly change the pH value of the water to which chloride dioxide is added. This is necessary so that materials and equipment that, in most instances, are made of 1.4301 stainless steel and come into contact with chloride dioxide are not damaged by corrosion to any appreciable extent. The chlorine dioxide solution has to be produced in a commercially viable manner. A small surcharge has to be accepted in some measure in favour of higher safety at work and lower corrosivity. lComparison of processes Chlorine dioxide solution for several dosage points can be produced in one unit with both the hydrochloric acid/chlorite and the sodium peroxodisulphate/chlorite process. Both units allow storing of chlorine dioxide that is stable over a certain time period Fig. 3 Test specimens IV (chlorine dioxide solution containing hydrochloric acid) and V (pH neutral chlorine dioxide solution) after an Source: Dr. Küke GmbH exposure time of 120 h in chlorine dioxide solution about 50 ppm 12 10 mass loss [%] l Requirements from an industrial viewpoint Fig. 2 Test specimens I (chlorine dioxide solution containing hydrochloric acid) and II (pH neutral chlorine dioxide solution) after an Source: Dr. Küke GmbH exposure time of 120 h in chlorine dioxide solution about 1000 ppm 8 6 4 2 0 hydrochloric acid/chlorite DK-DOX persulfate chlorite Fig. 4 Mass loss in tests 1 and 2 0,03 0,025 mass loss [%] Most equipment and parts in Hofbrauhaus Wolters GmbH in Brunswick are made of 1.4301 stainless steel. Since the autumn of 2013, DK-DOX® chlorine dioxide has been used. This is produced using the DK-KONT® chlorine dioxide generator in line with the sodium peroxodisulphate/ sodium chlorite process of the same name [3, 4], it can also be produced decentrally at the pasteuriser as container material in the form of a manually made-up two component system. As Brauhaus uses both the known hydrochloric acid/chlorite process as well as the peroxodisulphate chlorite process, a direct comparison of the two systems under industrial conditions is possible. 0,02 0,015 0,01 0,005 0 hydrochloric acid/chlorite DK-DOX persulfate chlorite Fig. 5 Mass loss in tests 3 and 4 Brauwelt International | 2015/II 3 BRAUWELT international | Knowledge | Cleaning and disinfection Summary of data tests 1-4 Test no. pH 1 2 3 4 1.4 6.3 2.2 6.7 Concentration [mg ClO2/l] 920 914 51 51 Mass loss [%] 11.1 0.28 0.029 0.00001 Table 1 with shorter stoppage times before restarting without any problems. The chlorine dioxide solution produced by the sodium peroxodisulphate/chlorite process has a stability of up to 30 days as a function of ambient temperature. It is thus stable for a longer period than the chlorine dioxide solution produced with the process using an excess of hydrochloric acid. For the hydrochloric acid/chlorite process, 9 percent hydrochloric acid and 7.5 percent sodium chlorite are used, both are available as liquids. In the Dr. Küke GmbH process, sodium peroxodisulphate is in the form of a solid and sodium chlorite in the form of a liquid. For water with a low total hardness and buffer capacity, dosage of chlorine dioxide produced with the hydrochloric acid/chlorite process and thus with a substantial excess of hydrochloric acid lowers the pH value. In the application described here, the environment of the filler is sprayed with 1.5 ppm chlorine dioxide solution. A pH less than four was measured in the raw water used, having a total hardness of 4° German hardness. Together with the chloride present, this causes considerable corrosion on the equipment coming into contact with the solution, such as the buffer tank for spray water. As the pH of the water to which chlorine dioxide is added is not influenced and as hardly any chloride is present in the sodium peroxodisulphate/chlorite process, corrosion is a comparatively minor problem at the same chloride dioxide concentration. At Hofbrauhaus Wolters, dosage of chlorine dioxide prepared with the sodium peroxodisulphate/chlorite process takes place in the area of conveyor belt lubrication. Dosage of chlorine dioxide is such that 1.5 ppm are supplied to the nozzle holders for conveyor belt lubrication. This is the same concentration as is used for permanent spraying of the filler environment. This is the reasons why the effects of the two different chlorine dioxide solutions can be compared. l Fig. 6 Slime-forming bacteria in the cooling tower of the pasteuriser Photo: Hofbrauhaus Wolters Fig. 7 Cooling tower of the pasteuriser operated with DK-DOX® Photo: Hofbrauhaus Wolters 4 Brauwelt international | 2015/II Comparison of economics of the two processes At today’s prices for hydrochloric acid and sodium chlorite, preparation of chlorine dioxide using the hydrochloric acid/chlorite process costs about 6 Eurocent/g of chlorine dioxide. Based on 250 production days and requirements of 500 g of chlorine dioxide/ day, the chemicals cost about 7500 EUR/ annum. Costs for the chemicals for operating the sodium peroxodisulphate/chlorite unit, producing the same amount of chlorine dioxide, amount to about 8000 EUR/annum. The additional costs for this plant are about 500 EUR/annum or about 2 EUR/production day. These additional costs have to be balanced off against higher safety at work and lower corrosivity from a commercial point of view. Use of chlorine dioxide is lower in an industrial environment than in the sample calculation. The capacity of the plant is currently being modified so that another dos- Cleaning and disinfection | Knowledge | BRAUWELT international age point can be operated. In addition to the two existing dosage points for mixing to the cold water of the bottle washer and for conveyor belt lubrication, a third dosage point for permanent spraying of the filler environment will be operated as a result of the positive experiences. This third dosage point will also be supplied by the sodium peroxodisulphate/chlorite plant. To do so, the existing hydrochloric acid/chlorite unit will be decommissioned. lAnother application Chlorine dioxide can also be used for the cooling water loop of the pasteuriser. Prior to using chlorine dioxide, a biocide based on chlorine methylisothiazolinone compounds was added to the pasteuriser water. As sugar-containing beverages pasteurised in the unit contribute to high nutrient val- ues, biological contamination is comparatively high. The lamellae of the cooling tower are made of plastic material so hot caustic solution cannot be used for clarification. Cold cleaning procedures did not yield the required result. Especially during the summer months, biofilm formation could not be prevented. Slime-forming bacteria settled along the lamellae, this can be clearly seen in figure 6. Conversion to chlorine dioxide took place in the autumn of 2013. DK-DOX® has been used since. In contrast to disinfection in the filler environment, this comes as a ready-to-use solution in a container. Within a number of weeks, increased discharge of biofilm was observed in the cooling tower before the lamellae in the whole cooling tower were uniformly cleared. This is shown in figure 7, the photo was taken in the spring of 2014. n lLiterature 1.http://www.dk-dox-brau.de/fileadmin/ head/110802_Desinfektionsmitteltest. pdf 2.Piklaps, H. M.: „Experimentelle Studien zur Bier- und Schankanlagenhygiene“, term paper 1, Staatsexamen für das Lehramt an berufsbildenden Schulen, University Hannover, 2006. 3. Küke, F.: „Die Erzeugung von Chlordioxid für den menschlichen Gebrauch“, Vom Wasser, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 2005, 103 (4), pp. 18-22. 4.Küke, F.: „Preiswerte Chlordioxiderzeugung für den Einsatz zur Oberflächendesinfektion in CIP Anlagen“, BRAUWELT, Nr. 17, 1997, pp. 651-652. In summary – comparison of processes In Germany, the use of chlorine dioxide in the food industry is limited to disinfection agents and processes approved in the German Drinking Water Regulation 2001. Two processes for preparation of chlorine dioxide are currently used in breweries: 1. sodium chlorite hydrochloric acid process 5 NaClO2 + 4 HCl ➝ 4 ClO2 + 5 NaCl + 2 H2O 2. sodium chlorite/sodium peroxodisulphate process 2 NaClO2 + Na2S2O8 ➝ 2 ClO2 + 2 Na2SO4 Sodium chlorite HCL process Sodium chlorite – Na2S2O8 process DK-DOX®, DK-KONT® processes Theoretically 80 per cent conversion of sodium chlorite to chlorine dioxide. Theoretically 100 per cent conversion of sodium chlorite to chlorine dioxide. Preparation of chlorine dioxide solutions with about 20 g of ClO2/l with 300 per cent hyperstoichiometric excess of hydrochloric acid. Preparation of chlorine dioxide solutions without dilution of 2 - 3 g/l with 1000 per cent hyperstoichiometric excess of hydrochloric acid. Preparation of chlorine dioxide solutions between 0 and 5 g/l according to reaction equation (2). Half-life of chlorine dioxide solutions with about 20 g of ClO2/l 6 - 12 h depending on ambient temperature. Stability of chlorine dioxide solutions with 2-3 ClO2/l with 1000 per cent excess of hydrochloric acid about 2 weeks. Chlorate formation: “Disinfection gaps” possible. Chlorine dioxide solutions are storable for one month with chlorine dioxide losses < 10 per cent p.m.; no disinfection gaps. Chlorine dioxide solutions prepared have pH values between –1 and 0.6, contain high amounts of chloride and, immediately after preparation, contain free chlorine (Cl2). Chlorine dioxide solutions prepared have pH values between 6 and 7, contain very low amounts of chloride and, immediately after preparation, do not contain free chlorine (neither HOCl nor NaOCl). Mixing up suction lances for the liquid sodium chlorite and hydrochloric acid reagents may result in severe accidents due to uncontrolled escape of chlorine dioxide and thus to operators being endangered. No mix-up of connections or hazardous situations can arise. The liquid sodium chlorite reagent goes into the reactor using a suction lance and a pump, the solid sodium peroxodisulphate reagent goes into the reactor with the dilution water flowing through a cartridge. Two dosing pumps for accurate dosing of identical volumes of hydrochloric acid (9 %) and sodium chlorite (7.5 %) are required in reactor. A simple peristaltic pump for dosing a 10 % chlorite solution. Readymade salt in cartridge is dissolved in dilution water. Control using level sensors. Brauwelt International | 2015/II 5 www.brauwelt.de www.brauweltinternational.com
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz