California Voter Views of the Shortage of Teachers in the K-‐12 Schools and Policies Aimed at Addressing the Problem – A statewide survey conducted for – EdSource and the Institute for Education Policy – by – The Field Poll October 2015 About the Survey Population surveyed: California registered voters. Method of data collection: Live telephone interviews conducted by The Field Poll in its late September – early October 2015 statewide survey. Sampling method: Voters selected at random from lists derived from the state’s official voter rolls. Languages of administration: English and Spanish. Sample size: 1,002 registered voters statewide. Interviewing period: September 17 – October 4, 2015 EdSource 1 Institute for Education Policy Graph 1 How serious is California’s shortage of public school teachers? Total No opinion 3% 11% Not serious 22% Somewhat serious % Very serious 64% Party registration Democrats Republicans No party preference/other 73% 48% 66% Gender Male 64% Very serious Female 60% 68% Race/ethnicity White non-‐Hispanic Latino African American* Asian/Pacific Islander * Small sample base. EdSource 2 57% 72% 82% 68% Institute for Education Policy Graph 2 How important is it for the state to do more to encourage young people and others to enroll in teacher prep programs? Total 2% No opinion Not import ant 7% 26% Somewhat important % Extremely important 65% Party registration Democrats Republicans No party preference/other 76% 49% 64% Gender Male 65% Extremely important Female 59% 70% Race/ethnicity White non-‐Hispanic Latino African American* Asian/Pacific Islander * Small sample base. EdSource 3 57% 74% 80% 70% Institute for Education Policy Graph 3 Voter reaction to two proposals aimed at dealing with the state teacher shortage Oppose strongly Oppose somewhat 8% 5% 27% Favor somewhat 2% No opinion 4% No opinion Oppose strongly 26% 14% Favor strongly 30% Favor somewhat 58% Favor strongly Oppose somewhat 26% Increase the number of teachers by having the state forgive a portion of college loans or offering scholarships* Allow schools to hire individuals who have not yet completed their training or earned a teaching credential * If the teacher teaches at least 4 years in a low-‐income community or in a subject where there is a shortage. EdSource 4 Institute for Education Policy Graph 4 How important is it for the state to do each of the following to ensure that there are more high-‐quality teachers in the K-‐12 schools? Extremely important Ensure all teachers receive rigorous training and preparation before they begin teaching Require that teachers receive ongoing professional development after they receive their teaching credentials Somewhat important 65% 29% 5% 62% 30% 6% 59% Ensure that new teachers receive mentoring and support so they don't leave teaching within a few years 31% 8% Provide opportunities for prospective teachers to receive a year of practice teaching under the guidance of an expert teacher EdSource Not important 51% 37% 11% 5 Institute for Education Policy Graph 5 How serious a problem is it that public schools in low-‐income communities have fewer fully qualified teachers than those in wealthier areas? Total No opinion 3% Not serious 8% 23% Somewhat serious % Very serious 66% Party registration Democrats Republicans No party preference/other 75% 50% 69% Gender Male 66% Very serious Female 60% 72% Race/ethnicity White non-‐Hispanic Latino African American* Asian/Pacific Islander * Small sample base. EdSource 6 61% 73% 82% 67% Institute for Education Policy Graph 6 Are the starting salaries of qualified K-‐12 teachers in your own local community too high, too low or about right? Total % Too low 58% Party registration Democrats Republicans No party preference/other 21% Don’t know 18% About right 66% 44% 61% Gender 58% Too low Male Female 52% 64% Race/ethnicity White non-‐Hispanic Latino African American* Asian/Pacific Islander * Small sample base. EdSource 7 53% 62% 73% 63% Institute for Education Policy Graph 7 How important is it for school districts to offer entry-‐level teachers starting salaries that are comparable to what is being offered to other new college graduates? Total 4% No opinion 51% Party registration Democrats Not import ant 8% 37% Somewhat important % Extremely important Republicans No party preference/other 51% Extremely important 63% 36% 49% Gender Male Female 45% 57% Race/ethnicity White non-‐Hispanic Latino 54% African American* 57% Asian/Pacific Islander 59% * Small sample base. EdSource 47% 8 Institute for Education Policy Graph 8 How important is it for the state’s teaching force to be racially, ethnically and linguistically diverse? Total 2% No opinion % Extremely important 46% Party registration Democrats Republicans No party preference/other 21% Not important 31% Somewhat important 46% Extremely important 60% 30% 42% Gender Male 39% Female 53% Race/ethnicity White non-‐Hispanic 35% Latino 63% African American* Asian/Pacific Islander * Small sample base. EdSource 9 73% 45% Institute for Education Policy Graph 9 Would you vote Yes or No on the Nov. 2016 statewide ballot prop. that would require schools to offer students not proficient in English academic instruction in both English and their native language?** Total Undecided % Yes Party registration Democrats 7% Republicans No party preference/other 32% No 61% 71% 42% 65% Gender 61% Yes Male Female 57% 65% Race/ethnicity White non-‐Hispanic 50% Latino 77% African American* 76% Asian/Pacific Islander * Small sample base. ** And require more opportunities for English-‐speakers to master other non-‐English languages. EdSource 10 71% Institute for Education Policy Graph 10 How likely would you be to encourage a friend or family member to become a K-‐12 teacher in California today? % Likely Very 2% No opinion Total Age 11% Not at all likely 34% Very likely 12% Not too likely 36% Somewhat likely 34 Somewhat 36 70% 18-‐29 24 39 63% 30-‐39 26 37 63% 40-‐49 34 38 72% 50-‐64 39 35 74% 65 or older Gender 43 32 75% Male 32 Female 36 Race/ethnicity White non-‐Hispanic 31 Latino 44 African American* 51 Asian/Pacific Islander 21 35 67% 37 34 73% 65% 34 28 48 78% 79% 69% * Small sample base. EdSource 11 Institute for Education Policy
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz