Influential Drivers Behind International and Domestic Environmental Packaging Mandates By Amit Sheth Environmental Packaging International October 4, 2006 For Fall Executive Conference This information is copyrighted and cannot be copied or distributed without prior written consent from Environmental Packaging International Environmental Packaging International • • • Specialists in global environmental packaging & product stewardship requirements Offices • Rhode Island, USA • Berlin, Germany • Toronto, Canada Our clients include: Environmental Packaging Requirements Affecting Producers in North America • I. Regulations • Design requirements • Heavy Metals Limits • Packaging fees • II. Other Factors Driving Packaging Design • Customer Requirements-Sustainable Packaging • Design for Environment Analysis (DfE) Overview of Environmental Packaging Requirements • • • Environmental design requirements in more than 40 countries • CEN Standards (Europe +) resulting from EU Packaging Directive • Empty space and source reduction requirements (Asia/Pacific) • Recycled content requirements (N. America) • Packaging prevention planning (Europe, Asia, Ontario) Environmental labeling (worldwide; requirements vary) Packaging fees in 40 countries, soon to be > 50 • Throughout EU as a result of the EU Packaging Directive, and Eastern Europe • New programs in Canada, Asia and Eastern Europe; scope and implementation vary EU Essential Requirements • The EU Packaging Directive mandates that all packaging sold in Europe meet a set of Essential Requirements related to: • Recovery (must meet at least one) • Recyclability • Organic recovery • Energy recovery • Reuse (optional) • Source Reduction (mandatory) • Heavy metals in packaging • Reduction of other noxious substances Packaging that does not comply with these Essential Requirements can legally be withheld from EU markets. What is the recovery route? • • Is the light, battery or tag a barrier to material recovery? What happens when it is recycled? Heavy Metals • • • • The sum of the concentration levels cannot exceed 100 ppm • Cadmium • Mercury • Lead • Hexavalent chromium US 19 States (incidental presence) and all of the EU EU and US both exempt certain applications containing recycled content (e.g. plastic crates/pallets) US (except NY) also prohibits the intentional addition of the four heavy metals in packaging, even if the concentration levels are below the threshold for incidental amounts. Heavy Metals in the EU • The Netherlands tests for heavy metals In late 2003, a major manufacturer had a shipment of laptops held up at customs in the Netherlands when inspectors found that PVC packaging (a clear sheet protecting the display) contained illegal levels of cadmium In early 2004, Dutch officials found that a shipment of toiletry bags could contain illegal levels of cadmium US States: CONEG Model Legislation Map VT WA ME NH MN WI NY PA IO CA MO IL VA GA FL Adopted Heavy Metals Legislation by States RI CT NJ MD Heavy Metals - US • "Package" refers to a container providing a means of marketing, protection or handling of a product and shall include a unit package, an intermediate package and a shipping container. • "Package" shall also mean and include such unsealed receptacles as carrying cases, crates, cups, pails, rigid foil and other trays, wrappers and wrapping films, bags and tubs. • "Packaging component" means any individual assembled part of a package such as, but not limited to, any interior or exterior blocking, bracing, cushioning, weatherproofing, exterior strapping, coatings, closures, inks and labels. Tin-plated steel, electrogalvanized coated steel and hot dipped coated galvanized steel that meets the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) shall be considered as a single package component. * *Source: Toxics in Packaging www.toxicsinpackaging.org Requirements Apply to Product & Packaging • There are no exemptions for packaging that is manufactured using solder that contains lead. • Understand the difference between RoHS (for electronics) and packaging limits Additional design requirements for electronics • Toxics in Packaging Study Toxics in Packaging Clearinghouse conducted a study from 11/05 to 2/06 on heavy metals contamination • 350 packaging systems were tested (over 550 packaging components) • Test included packaging materials (paper, glass, plastics, steel) Component types (bottle: label, cap, and bottle) Product categories (bags, textiles, food & beverage, toys) *Source: Toxics in Packaging www.toxicsinpackaging.org Toxics in Packaging Study - Results • • • 200 packaging systems (23%) were below 25ppm 70 packaging systems (16%) were between 25 to 100ppm 60 packaging systems were greater than 100ppm Cadmium and Lead most frequently detected (some Mercury) Ppm value ranged from 250 to 800ppm (detected up to 9000ppm) • Biggest culprits were: ! Clear, flexible PVC pouches and bags (mostly imports) ! Inks on shopping bags Dangerous Substances and Preparations • Producers must require each supplier to identify (via a Safety Data Sheet) any constituent identified as “noxious” (as so classified in Annex I of EC Directive 67.548 and its amendments with the symbol ‘N’), which is contained in or added to any packaging components. The supplier is also required to minimize the use of any dangerous substances in accordance with EN 13428: 2004 (the methodology is fully explained in CEN / TR 13695-2:2004). • Suppliers must list concentration levels of all Dangerous Substances if equal to or greater than 0.1% (1000 PPM) Empty Space Requirements • Taiwan: Empty space and layer limits for gift boxes of pastries, cosmetics, alcoholic products, and computer program disks were approved in 2005 and go into effect July 1, 2006 • will cover processed foods as of July 1, 2007 • • Japan: Cosmetics (primary packaging) - limit of 40% free space Australia: The Standing Committee on Trade Measurement adopted a Code of Practice on Deceptive Practices in Packaging of 1990; empty space must be < 25 to 40% depending on product type Canada: Packaging must not mislead consumer with respect to the quality or quantity of the product New Zealand: Fair Trade Act forbids deceptive packaging • • Korean Requirements • Packaging Layers • Packaging layers for a single product are limited to 2 layers • Packaging layers on the set product are limited to 2 layers • Penalty : 3 million won (USD 2,600)/product • Empty Space Packaging Ratio (Empty Ratio) • Packaging ratio on the single product must be less than 10% • Packaging ratio on the set product must be less than 25% • Penalty: 3 million won/product (USD 2,600) per case • The South Korean government has selected specific products for evaluation and non-compliant companies have been fined. From SEPA brochure Other Design Requirements • Japan Council for PET Bottle Recycling developed guidelines for PET containers. These have been endorsed by MITI • Container labels and adhesives must be easily removable. PET stretch labels and PET, Polyolefin, or OPS shrink labels are preferred. • PVC and foil labels, adhesives which cannot be easily removed, and printing directly on PET bottles are prohibited. • Container bodies must be made entirely of PET, easily compressed, and colorless. • Labels and printing ink must be able to be removed when bottles are washed in 1.5% caustic soda solution of 85 to 90 degree centigrade for 15 minutes. • Caps, inner plugs, and liners must be made predominantly of PE and PP. Aluminum caps are prohibited. Caps must have a specific gravity of 1.0 (i.e., the density must be that of water). Other Design Requirements • • • China (Approved by the Standing Committee of the National People's Congress (NPC) of the People's Republic of China) Passed on June 29, 2002, in effect 1/2003 • When products and packaging are designed, their influences on mankind and natural environments during their life-cycle must be considered and priority accorded to selecting toxin-free, nonhazardous, easily degraded and easily recycled options. • Enterprises should package the products in a reasonable manner to reduce the overuse of packaging materials and reduce the generation of packaging wastes. China ‘RoHS’ • Packaging for electronic information products must be made from "non-toxic, harmless, degradable and recyclable materials” and material coded according to mandatory National Standard GB 18455-2001. Australia – has developed packaging design guidelines similar to the CEN standards Rigid Plastic Packaging Containers (RPPC) • CA, OR, and WI have adopted the law • • CA allows 25% post-consumer materials (compliance option) Companies are marketing/communicating the recycled content ‘inclusion’ to consumers CA will allow manufacturers to purchase and consume post consumer RPPC generated in California • • Is this a business opportunity for Flexible packaging industry??? Which containers are affected? Subject Exempt if < 8 oz Companies that were audited for 2005 sales 3M Company Advance Group Inc. Airx Laboratories Albertson's / Sav-On Alticor, Inc. Amer Sports Corporation Avery Dennison Corporation Bar's Products Bayerische Motoren Werke AG Berwind Consumer Products LLC Best Buy Co., Inc. Bio Pac, Inc Bioforce Enviro-Tech, Inc. Bi-O-Kleen Industries, Inc. BISSELL Homecare, Inc. Bramton Company Carroll Company Distributor Alliance Group Casio Computer Co. Ltd. Cellco Partnership Circuit City Stores, Inc. Clorox Company Honda Motor Co., Ltd. News Corporation Limited CompUSA Inc. Huish Detergents Inc. NIKE, Inc. Cooper US, Inc. Nintendo Co., Ltd. Stater Bros. Holdings Inc. DaimlerChrysler AG ICI Paints North America c/o The Glidden Company Office Depot, Inc. Super Store Industries Dorel Industries Inc. Imation Corp. TDK Corporation E. I. Du Pont De Nemours And Company ITOCHU International Inc. OfficeMax, Inc. c/o Boise Cascade Corp. Ohio Art Company Unified Western Grocers, Inc. Ecover, Inc. ITW Dymon c/o Illinois Tool Works, Inc. Original Bungee Company Oxyfresh Worldwide, Inc. Staples, Inc. Timex Corporation USA Detergents, Inc. Electrolux North America, Inc. Kelly-Moore Paint Company, Inc. Fenway Partners, Inc. KIK International Houston Inc. PETCO Animal Supplies, Inc. Focus Golf Systems Maytag Corporation PPG Industries, Inc. Food 4 Less / Foods Co. McDonald's Corporation Rite-Aid Corporation Ford Motor Company Memorex Products, Inc. Roman Decorating Products Fry's Electronics, Inc. Method Products Inc. Fuji Film America, Inc. WAXIE Sanitary Supply Microsoft Corporation Royal Dutch Petroleum Company General Motors Corporation Mine Safety Appliances Company Samsonite Corporation Weider Health And Fitness Goodwin Ammonia Company Misty Mate, Inc. Schering-Plough Corporation Western Family Foods, Inc. Harbour Group Ltd. Mitsubishi Chemical Corporation Seaside Naturals LLC Whirlpool Corporation Seventh Generation Inc. Whole Foods Market, Inc. Head N.V. Henry Company Hewlett-Packard Company Hillyard, Inc. Permatex, Inc. Walgreen Company Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. Walt Disney Company Warnaco Group, Inc Warren Distribution, Inc. Sara Lee Corporation Motsenbocker Advanced Developments Inc. Sherwin-Williams Company Nestlé USA, Inc. Sony Corporation of America c/o Sony Electronics Inc. Newell Rubbermaid Inc. Venus Laboratories Inc. Yamanouchi Group Holding Inc. PVC (polyvinyl chloride) • • • • • • South Korea currently bans packaging components that are laminated, press packaged or coated with PVC, also PVC shrink-wrap, shrink sleeves, etc. Korea also has banned PVC wrapping of certain foods. PVC additives such as cadmium, lead and phthalates restricted Higher fees for PVC in some jurisdictions Many retailers refuse to accept goods in PVC packaging Presents a contamination problem for recycling of other resins, esp. PET Other non-regulatory concerns PVC (polyvinyl chloride) Packaging Fees & Design • In general, fees are based on the amount of packaging (weight) and material type • More packaging = more $$$ (higher fees) • The more difficult the material is to recycle, the higher the fees • Plastics, laminates and composites can cost up to 500% more than other materials • Packaging fees were conceived with varying goals in mind – not as a logical, uniform system! Packaging Fees Cont. • • Countries’ programs vary in terms of: • material definitions (% thresholds) • packaging definitions • kinds of packaging covered (household, commercial) • fee structures More emphasis on enforcement • Free riders • Audited reports • Technical Files for ERs What is Subject To Fees? Fees on transport packaging only in some countries (i.e. UK, Belgium, Austria) Printed Paper, Canada only Always Product Covered in all countries Direct Mail covered in France and Canada Copy paper covered in Quebec Prevalence of Packaging Fees Also in: Denmark Finland Netherlands Italy Romania Ukraine UK Fees started February 2004 Fees for product sold from 3/05 Fees planned for 2007 Fees planned for 2008 Also in: Japan South Korea Taiwan Philippines Thailand Map © PRO EUROPE as of 12/04 Fee Systems in North America: Ontario • • • • • • Stewardship Ontario is industry's municipal recycling program funding organization (TPO) Fee obligation started in 2004 Fees to pay for 50% of the cost of the operation of the municipally run Blue Box Programs Scope: only products sold to the household (includes consumables, etc. regardless of retail channel) Fees on printed paper! Packaging and printed materials that: • Are consumed in the household, and • Managed through municipal waste management systems Québec and beyond • • • Quebec • Bill 102 passed Dec. 18, 2002 • Québec Reg. released for comment March 17, 2004 • Requires producer responsibility - similar to Ontario • Includes copy paper • Industry would be responsible for up to 50% of waste management costs • Ontario and Quebec = 65% of Canadian market • Producers obligated as of 3/1/05; first report deadline in early 2007 Manitoba, BC and Alberta not too far away US mayors watching closely Customer Design Requirements Beyond Regulatory Compliance Companies must be able to comply with potential customer requirements: • Meet customer policies (corporate environmental vision) • PVC-free • Use of recycled content material • Certify paper-based packaging is from sustainable manageable forests Customer and Consumer Demand • Respond to Customer Demand • “Sam’s Club factor” vs. “Green Machine” • Wal-Mart drafting scorecard to be used in both purchasing and product placement discussion • Meet Growing Consumer Demand • What does the consumer want? Enhance Brand / Corporate Image • Socially Responsible Investment (SRI) listings • Dow Jones Sustainable Index • Customer Demand Wal-Mart Goes Green “The mega-chain is undergoing an extreme environ makeover. Even Al Gore is on board.” July 21, 2006 en e r G a o t s “Wal-Mart Focuses On Packaging.” m r a W t June 30, 2006: Local News for NW r a M la Arkansas .” “W look 006 t 2 Ou y 25, “Wal-Mart F lirts With Bein g Green: The Jul Wal-Mart’s pla sheer magnitu ns to become de of more environm has been enou entally friendly gh to give pau se to all but th vehement of th e most e company's c ritics.” April 22 , 2006 Draft Wal-Mart Scorecard • • • • • • No PVC CO2 e.g. from materials (and Energy) • Greenhouse gases for the packaging material CO2 Cube • Greenhouse gases for the transportation of the packaging Recycle Rate • What happens at end of life? Trees • Use of Recycled Content • Certified Forests Petroleum Use • Use of Recycled Content • Bio-Based Plastics Scorecard will be used in both purchasing and product placement discussion Environmental Issues are on the FRONT PAGE Growing Environmental Concerns 'Green packaging' demand to help environment By Le Tian April 20, 2006 China’s Vice-Premier Zeng Peiyan said, "The large increase of packaging waste has become a worldwide problem that deserves great attention.“ "A challenge for the Chinese packaging innovators is the creation of efficient packaging with the consumption of less energy and resources and less waste after use," said Alexis Stassinopoulos, president of the World Packaging Organization. Major Elements of a Packaging Design Protocol • • • • Raw Material Health: • Environmental impact during raw material production • Energy • Greenhouse gas emission • Feedstock “Bad Actor” used • Material Input (grams of input per gram of material produced) End of Life: • Reuse (Number of uses) • Recycling • Disposal • Landfill • Incineration with and without energy recovery Other Issues • Packaging Fees New Technologies • Must allow for innovation Raw Material Health • • Energy • How much and what types of energy are expended in sourcing virgin materials? • How much and what types of energy are expended in sourcing recycled materials? • Are any renewable sources used to produce the energy? Environmental impact during raw material production • Greenhouse gas emissions • Feedstock “Bad Actor” used • Material Input (grams of input per gram of material produced) Energy Use of Packaging Materials 1 bottle weighs 100 grams of virgin PET Each bottle uses 9,200 Btus of energy to produce the PET 1 million bottles would use 9,200,000,000 Btus or the amount of energy in 74,194 gallons of gasoline; enough to run a Honda Accord for 2,224,580 miles. Energy Use of Packaging Materials 1 composite flexible bag weighs 18.5 grams Each bag uses 2,000 Btus of energy 1 million bags would save 7,200,000,000 Btus Energy Use of Packaging Materials Reduce the size Money standard box weighs 57 grams Mini box weighs 40 grams 1 million boxes would save 765,000,000 BTUs Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Packaging Materials 1 bleached paperboard box weighs 87 grams For each box, 130.5 grams of CO2 is emitted by producing it with bleached paperboard 1 million boxes would use 130,500,000 grams or the amount of CO2 if 30 cars are driven a year Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Packaging Materials 1 composite flexible bag weighs 18.5 grams For each bag, 30 grams of CO2 is emitted 1 million bags would use 30,000,000 grams of CO2 or the equivalent of; 7 cars driven a year Bad Chemical Actor use in Feedstocks to Make Packaging Material • Bad actors are chemicals identified on 10 different lists, including • TRI (Toxic Release Inventory), • contaminants according to the Federal Safe Drinking Water Act, • EPA’s • Persistent, • Bioaccumulative and • Toxic Chemicals list. Bad Chemical Actor use in Feedstocks to Make Packaging Material 1 PVC blister - 10 grams Each blister uses 200 grams of these “bad chemical actors” If you used a PET blister, you would reduce the impact to 30 grams Or you could use no chemical bad actors by using 100% recycled PET Comparing Robitussin (24 Doses) Vicks NyQuil (10 Doses) Robitussin Capsules (6 Doses) Tylenol (8 Doses) Theraflu Strips (12 Doses) This information is copyrighted and cannot be copied or distributed without prior written consent from Environmental Packaging International Component & Material Type Table Unit of Recovery Robitussin Vicks NyQuil Component Material Type Weight (in grams) Box Bleached Box Paperboard 17.3 Plastic Container w/ Cap and Label Container Cap Label PET (Brown) PP Paper 88.0 3.3 0.5 Dosage Cap Cap PP 3.4 Plastic Container w/ Cap, Label, Container Cap Label PET (Clear) PP Paper 117.0 4.4 0.5 Seal Seal Unknown 0.5 Dosage Cap Cap PP 2.0 Plastic Container w/Cap, Label, and Instruction Booklet Container Cap Label Instruction Booklet PP PP Other Resin Paper 100.0 5.2 0.3 0.5 Dosage Cap Cap PP 5.0 Seal Seal Unknown 0.5 Tylenol Component & Material Type Table Unit of Recovery Theraflu Strips Robitussin Capsules Component Material Type Weight (in grams) Box Bleached Box Paperboard 8.6 Strip Strip Aluminum/Plastic 1.0 Box Bleached Box Paperboard 10.0 Blister Base Blister Aluminum Strip PVC Aluminum 4.3 1.3 Normalized Value Robitussin* Graph Material Health Indicators 2.5 N orm alized Values Energy 2 GHG 1.5 Material Inputs 1 Chemical Bad Actors 0.5 0 *Values have been normalized to reflect results for 24 Robitussin dosages Robitussin Vicks Tylenol Theraflu Robitussin NyQuil Strips Capsules Recyclability Units of Recovery Robitussin Vicks NyQuil Tylenol Theraflu Strips Robitussin Capsules Box PETE Bottle w/PP Cap and Label (Colored) PP Dosage Cap PETE Bottle w/PP Cap, Label and Seal (Clear) Material Recovery Energy Most Countries Few Countries Yes Yes Few Countries Yes Most Countries Yes PP Dosage Cap Few Countries Yes PP Bottle and Cap w/Label and Instruction Booklet (Clear) PP Dosage Cap Few Countries Yes Few Countries Yes Box Strip Most Countries Few Countries Yes Yes Box PVC Blister Most Countries Contaminant Yes Yes Packaging fees (per 1000 items) Canada Belgium (Ontario) France Germany Italy Japan Spain U.K. Robitussin $39.47 $13.30 $28.30 $165.11 $9.99 $0.01 $25.75 $11.10 Vicks NyQuil $50.60 $15.70 $32.53 $209.35 $12.53 $0.01 $31.99 $13.78 $57.35 $14.02 $29.21 $186.95 $11.19 $0.10 $28.57 $12.31 Theraflu Strips $0.57 $0.71 $3.19 $3.53 $0.26 $0.00 $0.78 $0.37 Robitussin Capsules $2.49 $1.34 $4.44 $11.07 $0.70 $0.00 $1.95 $0.91 Tylenol Conclusion • • • • • • • Understand packaging requirements (International & Domestic) Ensure that customers understand fee requirements Make sure customers include packaging fees in cost of goods Establish an Environmental Packaging Design Protocol Develop an Environmental Packaging Database Understand “end-of-life” Enhance brand/corporate image by noticing growing consumer demand for products that are perceived as healthy, natural, environmentally preferable, or sustainable Thank You Contact Information: Amit Sheth Environmental Packaging International Phone: 401-423-2225 Email: [email protected]
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz