OPTIMAL Lung cancer & EGFR activating mutations • Lung cancer is the most common cancer and one of the deadliest diseases worldwide: – 1.35 million new cases diagnosed every year 1 – Responsible for 1.18 million deaths each year 1 – Each day, more than 3,000 people die from lung cancer, equal to two deaths every minute 2 • Lung cancer with EGFR activating mutations is a distinct form of cancer • As many as one in three (30%) Asian patients and an estimated one in ten (10%) lung cancer patients in the Western population have NSCLC with EGFR activating mutations 3,4 1. Parkin DM. Global lung cancer statistics, 2002. CA Cancer J Clin (2005). 55. 74 – 108 2. 1.18 million deaths per year / 365 days = 3,232 deaths per day - 1.18 million deaths per year / 365 days – 3,232 deaths per day / 24 hours = 134 deaths per hour/60 minutes = 2.24 deaths per minute 3. Rosell R, Moran T, Queralt C, et al. N Engl J Med 2009;361:958–67. 4. Mitsudomi T, Kosaka T, Yatabe Y. Int J Clin Oncol 2006;11:190–8. Activating mutations occur in the area of EGFR where Tarceva is active Chromosome 7 EGFR transcript EGFR protein Exons 1–16 EGFR Cell membrane Exon 17 Activating mutations in Exons 18–24 Tyrosine – kinase domain Exons 25–28 Tarceva binds in this area Tarceva in NSCLC with EGFR activating mutations – phase III OPTIMAL study design Tarceva Chemonaïve Advanced NSCLC EGFR activating mutations R 1:1 165 patients Chemotherapy [gemcitabine and carboplatin] Primary endpoint • Progression-free survival (PFS) Secondary endpoints include • Overall survival (OS) • Objective response rate • Time to disease progression • Duration of response • Safety • Health-related QoL (FACT-L, LCSS) • Exploratory biomarker analyses FACT-L = Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lung; LCSS = lung cancer symptom scale Patients in both groups had similar characteristics Tarceva Chemotherapy (82 patients) (72 patients) Median age years, (range) 57 (31–74) 59 (36–78) Age <65 yrs / ≥65 yrs (%) 77 / 23 71 / 29 Male / Female (%) 42 / 58 40 / 60 Adenocarcinoma / non-adenocarcinoma (%) 88 / 12 86 / 14 Current or former smoker / never-smoker (%) 28 / 72 31 / 69 Current = smoked >100 cigarettes in entire lifetime and are either currently smoking or quit smoking <1 year ago Former = smoked >100 cigarettes in entire lifetime and quit smoking ≥1 year ago Never = smoked ≤100 cigarettes in entire lifetime or never smoked Tarceva nearly tripled time people lived without their disease getting worse (PFS) 1.0 Tarceva People lived a median of 13.1 months without their disease progressing, which is over one year PFS probability 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 4.6 0 0 13.1 5 Chemotherapy People lived a median of 4.6 months without their disease progressing 10 15 20 Time (months) 25 HR=0.16 (0.10–0.26), p<0.0001 Translates to 84% risk reduction Over half of all Tarceva patients were alive and progression free at one year 1.0 Tarceva At one year 56.9% patients were alive without their disease progressing PFS probability 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 0 5 10 15 20 Time (months) Chemotherapy At one year 1.7% patients were alive without their disease progressing 25 All patient sub-groups had better PFS with Tarceva Overall Female Male Age ≥65 Age <65 Never smoker Current/former smoker Adenocarcinoma Non-adenocarcinoma 0 0.5 1.0 HR Favours Tarceva 1.5 Favours chemotherapy Tarceva gave patients a better tumour response Tarceva Chemotherapy 82 patients 72 patients 2.4 % 0.0 % Partial Response 80.5 % 36.1 % Stable Disease 13.4 % 45.8 % 3.7 % 16.7 % Overall Response Rate 82.9 % 36.1 % p<0.00001 Disease Control Rate 96.3 % 81.9 % p=0.002 Complete Response Progressive Disease Chemotherapy was associated with more haematologic toxicity 100 80 Tarceva Grade 1/2 Patients (%) Grade 3/4 60 40 20 0 Chemotherapy Grade 1/2 Grade 3/4 No unexpected adverse events were seen with Tarceva 100 Patients (%) 80 60 40 20 0 Tarceva Chemotherapy Grade 1/2 Grade 1/2 Grade 3/4 Grade 3/4 Overall conclusions • Tarceva first-line nearly triples median progression free survival in lung cancer with EGFR activating mutations • More than twice as many patients who received Tarceva experienced shrinkage of their tumours compared to those who received chemotherapy • Benefits were observed regardless of histology, smoking history, age, sex and stage of disease • Tarceva was better tolerated than chemotherapy
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz