Faculty of Health Sciences ; Speech Pathology Creating “Language-Accessible” Secondary School Classrooms Through Professional Collaborations. Julia Starling Speech-Language Pathologist/PhD student Julia Starling 2011 Lost for Words: Lost for Life? City University, London 2011 1 Who are we talking about, and what do we know about them? 7-16% of secondary school students with persistent Primary Language Impairment (LI): affecting the understanding and/or use of language in both oral and written language domains • Academic failure (Conti-Ramsden et al. 2009; Snowling et al. 2001 ). • Overlap of language and literacy difficulties (Smart et al., 2001; Stothard et al., 1998) • Psycho-social and behavioural problems (Brownlie et al. 2004;Clegg et al., 2005) • Juvenile offender populations (Bryan, 2007; Snow & Powell 2004). Julia Starling 2011 2 Recommended models of service delivery 1. Professional literature: collaborative, school-based services, including teacher training to facilitate inclusive support (Ehren, 2002; Elksnin, 1997; Gascoigne, 2008; Law et al. 2002; Shaddock, 2007). 2. 3. Government reports: Removal of barriers to learning for young people with SLCN (e.g. Bercow, 2008) Professional development research: Sustained, site-based professional development for teachers presented by “outside experts” leads to positive effects on student outcomes (Guskey & Yoon, 2009) Julia Starling 2011 3 Clinical directives Best-practice guidelines: • Strategy-based interventions (e.g. Hollingsworth, 1993) • Written expressive/receptive language support (e.g. Wong et al., 1996) • Vocabulary enrichment (e.g. Beck et al., 2002) • Graphic organisers (visual aids) (e.g. Mastropieri et al., 2003) (Summary in Starling et al. 2011) Julia Starling 2011 4 Sharing expertise Teachers are the experts in acquiring and disseminating curricular information; they can provide topical information regarding curricular goals and content, ensuring any intervention has immediate academic relevance and opportunities for practice and generalisation. SLPs have expertise in the expression and reception of information; they can provide specific information regarding individual students’ communication and learning support needs, as well as training in general strategies applicable to teachers’ grade and subject needs. Julia Starling 2011 5 Looking at things from a different angle LI persists into adolescence, but there are many barriers to providing effective supports Most adolescents with LI attend mainstream secondary schools. However…. 80-85% of instruction is language-based (Brent et al 2001): oral and written language for curricular instruction, across subjects and grades The language of the secondary classroom can be complex (e.g. Whitmire, 2001). The result is….. Students with LI are often disadvantaged in understanding curricular content; disengaged in oral interactions; disempowered in expressing knowledge through writing (e.g.Starling et al.,in press 2011) Julia Starling 2011 6 One solution? Creating “language-accessible” secondary classroom environments SLTs empower secondary teachers in providing inclusive support to students with LI in their classes. How? By training teachers in the development and use of modifications to mainstream secondary teachers’ oral and written instructional language. So that: Teachers can facilitate improved access to curricular instruction for their students with LI. Julia Starling 2011 7 Why? So that students with additional learning needs such as LI will be better able to: • Access the curriculum i.e. attend to, process, retain and use presented information • Be more engaged in learning by increasing their direct participation in class activities • Demonstrate a better understanding of curriculum content on assignments, projects and tests • Develop and use a broader and more “robust” vocabulary • Feel better and more confident about themselves as able learners • Be less at risk of developing psycho-social problems Julia Starling 2011 8 Language In Classrooms Program developed and piloted at a Sydney secondary school in 2006, a joint project of the University of Sydney/NSW Dept of Education. Subject of an RCT, with the aims of: Evaluating the efficacy of a teacher training program. Evaluating the sustainability of the ideas presented in the training program. Evaluating the impact of the training program on the language abilities of secondary school students with LI. Julia Starling 2011 9 The program • Mainstream secondary teachers were trained by an SLT in the development and application of oral and written instructional language accommodation and modification techniques. • Training occurred weekly, one-on-one, over the period of a school term (10 weeks). • Strategies used by trained teachers in their regular classes, thereby addressing needs of students with LI inclusively, across subjects and grades. • Additional professional development provided for whole-school teaching staff. Julia Starling 2011 10 Study participants 2 secondary schools Randomised allocation to experimental/control condition Government, co-educational Population matched 13 mainstream teachers (primary cohort) 7 experimental/6 control Teachers of identified Year 8 students with LI Across disciplines: Maths, English, Science, Physical Education, History, Agriculture 44 students with LI (secondary cohort) 22 experimental/22 control Year 8: age range 12y 10m - 14y 3m 34m/10f Identified by school staff, LI confirmed by screening (verbal/non-verbal assessment) Julia Starling 2011 11 Results: Teacher outcomes When compared to teachers who had not received the training (control group): • Trained teachers took up and used program techniques in their classroom teaching practices • Ideas shared with teaching colleagues • Use sustained over a period of time Julia Starling 2011 12 Student outcomes When compared to students whose teachers had not received the training (control group): • Students demonstrated an improvement in their Written Expression and Listening Comprehension scores to a level of significance • No significant change in their Reading Comprehension and Oral Expression scores. Julia Starling 2011 13 Implications of results. • High degree of teacher use and application of the LINCS Program techniques. • Positive impact on language abilities of students with LI: written expression and listening comprehension. • Ideas applicable to secondary school teachers from a range of teaching disciplines. • Use sustained over a period of time without further direct support. • Collaborative sharing of ideas across the whole school. Julia Starling 2011 14 Quotes from teachers • “Because (the students) can understand better, they can perform better”. • “They’re not so scared of big words as before the intervention.” • “They love to write, I just couldn’t believe it! It’s a Maths lesson and they actually enjoy writing about the specific terms and what they know!” • “The (program’s) brought back the awareness that some kids, behaviour-wise, may play up simply because they can’t do the work”. • “Some teachers have actually used (the ideas) with a different year group and found that they worked really well.” Julia Starling 2011 15 The language of adolescence • Abstract language: inferential, analytical, problem solving • Figurative language: idioms, metaphors, proverbs • Social language: Formal/informal codes (including “electronic communication”), peer group, slang, sarcasm, jokes, innuendo, opinions, discussions, arguments, debate • Academic vocabulary: Literate (more formal) Technical Instructional Written expression: essays, reports, analyses, expositional, comparative studies, creative writing Metalinguistic development: Ability to use words to describe words (e.g. definitions) Julia Starling 2011 16 The language of instruction Spoken and written language provides the building blocks for conveying information to students, and testing their knowledge and progress. “Build The Field”: developing students’ knowledge through Prior knowledge (word and world knowledge) Use of context, resources Glossaries, definitions Brainstorming Text deconstruction Students’ supported and independent reconstructions Julia Starling 2011 17 Q: What makes it difficult for you to learn a subject? -The way they speak -Saying it too fast -It gets confusing -Too much stuff to remember -He answers questions too quickly and we still don’t learn -She gives us words all the time that I don’t understand -I don’t know about anything but I can’t go and read about it -I just don’t get it! Julia Starling 2011 18 Q: What makes it easier? -Extra explains and repeats -Tell us clearly and slowly -Make it interesting with pictures -Give us time to work it out so we can try our best -She writes it and tells me too -Having someone explain what I have to do -A good teacher explains real good, some teachers make it more confusing! Julia Starling 2011 19 The language-accessible classroom: Reducing the complexity of teachers’ language: oral and written Written information that students can process by themselves Prioritising essential vocabulary with descriptions that are relevant and use-able Increasing visual supports Reducing the speed of delivery/increasing time for processing and production Julia Starling 2011 20 Language modification strategies: The LINCS Program Direct vocabulary Information processing instruction •Identification of key vocabulary for new topics (“10 Key Words”) •Interactive creation of relevant descriptors/definitions •Breaking down texts: Mapping central idea, associated facts/details •Supplementing verbal/print information with visuals Teachers’ written language Teachers’ oral language •Modifying the language of worksheets, assignments and tests. •Changing the sequence of presented information e.g. text and questions layout •Slower speech rate, or better voice projection •Facing the class, not the board •Repetition of key facts Julia Starling 2011 21 Some examples of strategy applications Strategy Application Vocabulary instruction “10 Key Words”: all teachers identifying the 10 essential words/terms before starting a new topic, for direct instruction. Accessing text History: Interactive mapping of main point/associated facts taken from history text. Increased use of visual aids Science: Visual planner onto board at start of each lesson, for teacher and student reference Structuring students’ writing English: Step-by-step structures for essay writing, with models. Julia Starling 2011 22 Direct vocabulary instruction: Why is vocabulary important for secondary school students? For comprehension of curriculum content, instructions and explanations in class. For communicative competence: for “Getting their message across” in oral and written expression For reading/writing: students are better able to identify and write words if these words are already in their oral vocabulary. For application in a range of written texts, including work sheets, assignments, tests and exams. For active engagement in classroom-based learning experiences, including discussions. Julia Starling 2011 23 “Massacre” : There had been a massacre of Aborigines at Bird Creek. What do you think it means? A meeting? Makeup?? ???**!! !?*??!* A family of Aboriginal people? Julia Starling 2011 24 “Strong” vocabulary use (sample: 14 year olds) “Weak” vocabulary use Written language: Use of “however”. Jason prefers to play with the silver robot as it is more entertaining, however the gold robot is more useful as he has trained it to do his chores. One is big and however one is small. Oral language: Giving directions To remove the snack bar from the bottom of the machine, you need to use both hands as the opening often gets stuck. You open the thing then you get the chocolate and that’s it. Julia Starling 2011 25 Word knowledge: What does it mean to “know “ a word? 1. No knowledge: Never seen/heard it before. (PHLOEM) 2. Very general sense of connotation/meaning: Feel you know it but can’t really explain what it means. (EFFULGENT) 3. Context-bound knowledge: We have “learnt” a word in a single context. (TWITTER) 4. “Knowing” a word but not being able to recall it readily enough to use in a range of situations. (CONCATENATE) 5. “Rich” knowledge. (POWER) (Beck, McKeown & Omanson 1987) Julia Starling 2011 26 Rich word knowledge • • • • • We can define the word in a generalised way Not dependent on context (decontextualised) We can apply it in appropriate situations, with precision Breadth: knowledge of multiple meanings, metaphorical use, range of derivations Availability is “strong” i.e. ready retrieval, with well-mapped semantic connections and clear phonological specifications (i.e. We can SAY it, SPELL it and we know what it MEANS!). Julia Starling 2011 27 The Case for Direct Vocabulary Instruction • Remember the GREAT DIVIDE: we can help close it by proactive intervention. • Wide reading enhances vocabulary. However, most young people with LI are NOT wide readers. • Learning differences often means that vocabulary has to be directly taught muti-modally, to help them get to the “rich word knowledge” level: robust word learning involves an interaction of perceptual, social and linguistic cues. • Direct vocabulary instruction works! National Reading Panel, 2000; Graves, 2000; Wilson, Nash& Earl, 2010; Anderson & Nagy, 1991……. Julia Starling 2011 28 Direct Vocabulary Instruction Beck, McKeown & Kucan (2002): Bringing Words to Life Tier 1 The most everyday,basic and familiar words in our vocabulary, that rarely need direct instruction. Examples: clock, baby, happy, walk, face, sky…. Tier 2 Words that are of high utility for language users, but that often need to be directly taught. They are of high frequency use and are found across a variety of domains. Examples: coincidence, absurd, industrious, fortunate, cultural….. Tier 3 Words that are of low frequency use, or that apply to specific domains. May be essential to learning a topic. Examples: isotope, lathe, peninsula, metamorphosis….. Julia Starling 2011 29 Essential vocabulary Rich knowledge of Tier 2/3 words can have a high impact on verbal functioning (oral and written) Decision points for prioritising: • “Must know”: Essential to the learning of a topic or concept. Words should be directly and systematically taught. • “Should know”: Highly significant, although not essential, to understanding the topic or concept. • “Could know”: Interesting and stimulating, though not necessary for a basic understanding of a topic. e.g. “communism”: interesting or essential? Julia Starling 2011 30 10 key words! **Realistic direct instructional contribution that will make a difference: 400 words a year (10/week) High frequency and essential Tier 2/3 words Across subjects/topics/grades Secondary Schools in LINCS Program study -Teachers across disciplines -Prioritised up to 10 essential words (“Must Knows”) when planning each new topic. -Embedded these words in all teaching -Engaged students in interactions with these words. Julia Starling 2011 31 6 Steps for Effective Vocabulary Instruction: Step 1: Introducing words Robert Marzano (2004) -Provide descriptions, explanations and examples of use of the new words -In oral and written form -”Must knows” and “Should knows” - 10 max. at a time Step 2: Students restate in own words -Students actively engaged in working out a useful description, and applications. -Through class discussions, brainstorming, linking with prior knowledge (word and world knowledge) -Goal: the storage of new words in students’ long-term memory (needs a minimum 12 repetitions) Step 3: Visual representations -Assists in retention and later recall and use of words -Visual approach supports auditory/verbal, important for many students with LI Representations in symbols, word art, diagrams, time-32 Julia Starling 2011 lines, charts, mind maps, word webs……. -Move from approximate understanding at first, to firmer Step 4: Regular exposure understanding later -For true word learning, students must be able to say it, read it and write it appropriately -Use understanding of roots, prefixes and suffixes to increase understanding -Include in worksheets, quizzes, word walls, vocabulary “mix and matches”, your verbal/written presentations, classifying tasks, labels on models…… Step 5: Discussions of words amongst students -Increases the recall and application to a range of contexts, keeps words “alive” -Encourages students’ confidence in using “new/challenging” words. Encourages application in a socially and orally interactive situation, not just for worksheets. Step 6: The play step! -Using games as a tool for vocabulary development e.g. vocabulary games, find-a-word, crosswords, quizzes, on-line games,contests etc. Julia Starling 2011 33 -Fun, stimulating, increases exposure Alternatives to “Look it up in the dictionary!” Students with language and literacy difficulties have problems using dictionaries: They have poor alphabetic skills They have poor reading ability The definitions used in dictionaries (and in glossaries) are often complex, and difficult to understand. Result: Students may learn parts of definitions by rote, however have no understanding of what the word really means (exceptions include the Collins Cobuild series). **Warning: Make sure the definition/description you are using in a glossary is understandable AND matches the required application! Julia Starling 2011 34 2 alternatives 1. Morphological breakdown: root words, prefixes, suffixes. Meanings of 60% of multi-syllabic words can be worked out by analysing word parts (Bromley 2007) Prefixes: pre-, un-, dis-, semi, extra- (re-, dis-, un-, and imaccount for 50% of words with prefixes) Root words: history, circle, culture….. Suffixes: -able, -ing, -ly, -ar, -ism….. (-s/-es, -ed, -ing account for 60% of words with suffixes) e.g.: pre-history-ic -> prehistoric Semi-circle-ar -> semicircular Multi–culture–al –ism -> multiculturalism Un-de-cipher-able -> undecipherable Julia Starling 2011 35 2. Using context Assist students in using context clues: • Definitions (The tundra is a vast, open area of land) • Synonyms/antonyms ( His impeccable uniform was so perfect that…) • Examples given for a group word (The felines included lions, tigers, cheetahs…) • Cause and effect (We lingered so long that we missed the bus) • General context (He was very patriotic and couldn’t be more proud of his country) **+/- 70% English words have at least 2 meanings (Bromley, 2007). Make sure the word fits the context! Julia Starling 2011 36 Direct vocabulary instruction for teaching research skills Finding the right information requires using the right key words. In your biography of ……. write about the hurdles she faced in her life. Year 7 student : “I couldn’t find anything on the United Nations!” Julia Starling 2011 37 Accessing written language • What can be modified? Teacher-generated texts especially information sheets, worksheets, glossaries, definitions, test papers, visual frameworks for written genres, study skills strategies….. • What accommodations can be made? Selection of required texts, textbooks, dictionaries, direct teaching of key words for internet searches….. Julia Starling 2011 38 Check list for modifying written language • Check for “process-ability” of language used: length of sentences, embedded clauses, sheer amount of text, unfamiliar vocabulary….?? • Provide word descriptions for new and unfamiliar vocabulary, instructional words, terminology • Use graphics to aid text comprehension • Layout changes: “chunking” sections of information, bolding key words, organising and sequencing, questions related to text on same page for easier reference….. Julia Starling 2011 39 Example from PDHPE: Pre Task: Risk story Students are to devise a story that outlines a character (a minimum of three), context and happenings related to their risk environment. Students need to identify and describe the following: • Possible consequences of the situation (e.g. physical, emotional, legal….) for each character • Reason why each problem may have occurred. Julia Starling 2011 40 Post modification Topic: Reducing the Risk Key Task: Students are to write a story that includes the Instruction Words following: Identify: to 1. At least 3 characters name the 2. The context (setting) of the story: you need to risks. set the scene of a “risky” situation. Describe: Provide the 3. The main events: What happens? You need main features to identify and describe the following: a) Potential risks associated with the situation b) Possible problems that happen as a result (the consequences) of each of these risks. For example, they may be: physical – e.g. a broken nose social – e.g. parents no longer trust you emotional – e.g. feeling ashamed financial – e.g. the cost of repairing broken property Julia Starling 2011 41 legal – e.g. a criminal record Example: Science/Unit on Space B. Invention of the Telescope Definition: A telescope is an instrument that makes distant objects look larger, and therefore nearer. The invention of telescopes has allowed scientists to look out into space. This has made it easier to study objects in space. It is believed that the telescope was invented in 1608. We don’t know for sure who invented it, but scientists think it was probably a spectacle maker in Holland. A famous scientist called Galileo Galilei was the first to use a telescope to make astronomical observations (that is, to study objects in space). His telescope had a magnification of twenty. This made objects look twenty times closer. With his telescope, Galileo was able to see details of the moon’s surface. Questions: 1. What do spectacle makers make? 2. Who was the first scientist to use a telescope to look into space? 3. What might the word magnification mean? Julia Starling 2011 42 Example 3: pre. Extract from a 5 paragraph text. In 1798 the French, led by General Napoleon Bonaparte, invaded Egypt. Bonaparte was not only a soldier, he was extremely interested in learning more about the history of Egypt. With his army there traveled scholars and scientists. In the course of their investigations, whilst the soldiers were dismantling an ancient fort in the town of Rosetta, a black stone slab covered with three different scripts was unearthed. The Rosetta Stone proved to be of great historical importance. The French language experts could see that while one of the languages on the stone was Egyptian hieroglyphics and the second was also unknown to them, the third was Greek, a language with which they were familiar. (From Key into Inferencing. Triune, 2000) Julia Starling 2011 43 Example 3: post. Whole class activity Who? Discovered by Napoleon’s army When? In 1793 Discovery Why? Napoleon was invading Egypt Where? In the town of Rosetta, Egypt What happened? They dug up a stone How? They noticed the hieroglyphic writings Julia Starling 2011 44 Example 4: pre. Visual Arts Glossary: Displayed on an overhead Task: Copy these words and definitions into the back of your diary Sculpture: Method of making 3 dimensional art Statue: Solid carved or cast image of a person, animal etc. Relief: A carved design raised up off the surface Anthropomorphic: Appropriation of human motivation, characteristics, or human behaviour to inanimate objects, animals or natural phenomena Appropriation: To borrow something or use it elsewhere Traditional; A set way of doing things Monochromatic: Painted or shown in one colour only Abstraction: Non representational Unity: Becoming one Collage: Composition of bits and pieces stuck together on a background Conduit: To channel or direct something in a certain way or direction Biomorphic: Resembling or suggesting the forms of living organisms Geometric: Uses straight lines only Elusive: Difficult to catch/hold on to Multifaceted: Many sided object Julia Starling 2011 45 Example 4: Modifications Teacher and SLT worked together to make the following changes: • Selected 10/15 words as essential, “Must Know” vocabulary. • Rewrote definitions as descriptions using Collins Cobuild Learner’s Dictionary e.g. Traditional is an adjective form of the noun “tradition”, a custom or belief that has existed for a long time. • Followed Marzano’s 6 steps for embedding these key terms, and the others as they arose, into the curriculum content. Julia Starling 2011 46 General accommodations • Allow extra processing and work production time • Encourage active listening • Ensure instructions are explicit, rather than inferred • Increase use of visual aids: colour coding, symbol referents, step-by-step frameworks…. • Assist with organisation of work folders, time planning, plans and outlines, equipment…. • Model strategies e.g. visual planners, use of key vocabulary, writing scaffolds, note taking, active study strategies….Julia Starling 2011 47 (Some of many….) resources Collins: Cobuild Series. Concise Learner’s Dictionary, Student’s Dictionary Isabel Beck et al books: Bringing Words to Life (2002), and Creating Robust Vocabulary (2008) Robert Marzano books e.g. Building Background Knowledge (2004), Building Academic Vocabulary (2005) Larson, V.L., & McKinley, N. L. (2003). Communication Solutions for Older Students. Eau Claire: Thinking Publications. Tattershall, S. (2002). Adolescents with Language and Learning Needs. Albany, NY: Singular. Brent, Gough & Robinson (2001). One in Eleven: Practical strategies for teaching adolescents with language-learning disability. Brent & Millgate Smith (2008). Working Together:Linking skills and curriculum for adolescents with language learning disability. Both from Acer Press, Melbourne, Aus The Adventure of English. Melvyn Bragg (2003). Book and DVD Proust and the Squid: The story and science of the reading brain. Maryanne Wolf (2007). Vocabulary Cartoon of the Day: Marc Tyler Nobleman. Scholastic www.vocabulary.com Julia Starling 2011 48 The University of Sydney Faculty of Health Sciences Speech Pathology Contact details: [email protected] Acknowledgements: PhD supervisory team Ass/Prof. Leanne Togher, Dr. Natalie Munro, Dr. Joanne Arciuli Funding: The Jack Bloomfield Scholarship, Speech Pathology Australia The Creswick Foundation Julia Starling 2011 Lost for Words: Lost for Life? City University, London 2011 49
© Copyright 2024 Paperzz