What can WNI do for your business? Oct‐24th 2012
Pacific Ocean
Good Weather Definition
W
Wave Height < 1.25[m] (DSS‐3)
H i h 1 2 [ ] ( SS 3)
Wind Speed < 16[knots] (BF‐4)
100%
90%
80%
Oakland to Hong Kong
６０５０NM
６５００NM
70%
60%
50%
Bad Wx
40%
Good Wx
30%
Data Sampling Position: D t S
Data Sampling Period:
li P i d
Jan‐01/2009 ‐ Dec‐31/2011
20%
10%
0%
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Month
8
9
10
11
12
Atlantic Ocean
Good Weather Definition
Wave Height < 1 25[m] (DSS 3)
Wave Height < 1.25[m] (DSS‐3)
Wind Speed < 16[knots] (BF‐4)
100%
90%
80%
Rotterdam to New York
３４００NM
３５００NM
70%
60%
50%
Bad Wx
Bad Wx
40%
Good Wx
30%
Data Sampling Position: D t S
Data Sampling Period:
li P i d
Jan‐01/2009 ‐ Dec‐31/2011
20%
10%
0%
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Month
8
9
10
11
12
1. Optimum Ship Routeing (OSR)
Optimum Speed?
Optimum Speed?
•
•
•
•
•
Every ship is different (Every Voyage is deferent)
h
d ff
(
d f
)
You need to set speed (RPM) Someone needs to monitor (Target Management)
Ship to shore clear reporting procedure with MT.
Ship to shore clear reporting procedure with MT. Least Cost (Fuel Consumption, +/‐ En route time)
1. Optimum Ship Routeing (OSR)
Optimum
Optimum Speed?
Speed?
FIXED INSTRUCTION ( Speed / RPM )
1.
2.
2
Operator’s INSTRUCTION (Full/Eco/MCR%) for each business priority.
(least time or least fuel or on‐time.) Master
Master’ss NAVIGATION
NAVIGATION with or without weather routing with or without weather routing
FLEXIBLE INSTRUCTION ( Speed / RPM Allocation ) = OSR Route and RPM Optimization 1.
2.
2
3.
Operator’s BUSINESS PRIORITY (Least time, Least fuel, On‐time) by realistic VOYAGE COMPARISON of OSR. VOYAGE PLANNING
VOYAGE PLANNING (Route/RPM/FOC) for ship master to keep confirmed your (R t /RPM/FOC) f hi
t t k
fi
d
business prioritization Voyage and daily TARGET MANAGEMENT.
1. Optimum Ship Routeing (OSR)
1 Voyage
1.
Voyage Comparison for your prioritization Comparison for your prioritization
(Least time/Least Fuel/On‐Time/Least Cost/Safety First)
2. Voyage Planning for ship master
3 Target Management (En route time/RTA/FOC/RPM)
3.
Target Management (En route time/RTA/FOC/RPM)
4. Asset Management ( Voyage evaluation / Performance / Proforma / Ship Ranking )
Plan
Do See 2. OSR Core Value
1. Voyage Comparison for Operator’s decision
2. Voyage Planning for Master’s navigation
Voyage Comparison
•
•
•
•
•
Least – Time
Least
On – Time (RTA) Least Fuel
Least – Cost
Safety First Voyage Planning
•
•
•
•
•
Route Route
RPM En route time
FOC Natural/Social Hazard 2. OSR Core Value (PLAN: Voyage Comparison)
1 Vo
1.
Voyage Comparison for your business priority age Comparison for o r b siness priorit
(Least time/Least Fuel/On‐Time/Least Cost/Safety First)
2. Voyage Planning for ship master to keep confirmed your business prioritization
3. Target Management (En route time/RTA/FOC/RPM)
/
/
/
4. Asset Management ( Performance / Proforma / Ship Ranking )
2. OSR Core Value (PLAN: Voyage Comparison)
1. Weather prediction/Calculated performance by text
2. Weather forecast by Graph
3. Performance prediction by Graph
2. OSR Core Value (Do: Voyage Planning)
1. Voyage Comparison for your business priority y g
p
y
p
y
(Least time/Least Fuel/On‐Time/Least Cost/Safety First)
2. Voyage Planning for ship master to keep confirmed your business prioritization
3 Target Management (En route time/RTA/FOC/RPM)
3.
Target Management (En route time/RTA/FOC/RPM)
4. Asset Management ( Performance / Proforma / Ship Ranking )
2. OSR Core Value (Do: Voyage Planning)
1. Voyage Comparison for your prioritization y g
p
y
p
(Least time/Least Fuel/On‐Time/Least Cost/Safety First)
2. Voyage Planning for ship master to keep confirmed your business prioritization
3 Target Management (En route time/RTA/FOC/RPM)
3.
Target Management (En route time/RTA/FOC/RPM)
4. Asset Management ( Performance / Proforma / Ship Ranking )
2. OSR Core Value ( See : Performance monitoring )
1. Voyage Comparison for your business priority y g
p
y
p
y
(Least time/Least Fuel/On‐Time/Least Cost/Safety First)
2. Voyage Planning for ship master to keep confirmed your business prioritization 3 Target Management (En route time/RTA/FOC/RPM)
3.
Target Management (En route time/RTA/FOC/RPM)
4. Asset Management ( Performance / Proforma / Ship Ranking )
2. OSR Core Value ( See : Performance monitoring )
1. Voyage Comparison for your prioritization y g
p
y
p
(Least time/Least Fuel/On‐Time/Least Cost/Safety First)
2. Voyage Planning for ship master to keep confirmed your business prioritization 3 Target Management (En route time/RTA/FOC/RPM)
3.
Target Management (En route time/RTA/FOC/RPM)
4. Asset Management ( Performance / Proforma / Ship Ranking )
2. OSR Core Value (See : Performance Evaluation) 1. Voyage Comparison for your prioritization y g
p
y
p
(Least time/Least Fuel/On‐Time/Least Cost/Safety First)
2. Voyage Planning for ship master to keep confirmed your business prioritization 3 Target Management (En route time/RTA/FOC/RPM)
3.
Target Management (En route time/RTA/FOC/RPM)
4. Asset Management ( Performance / Proforma / Ship Ranking )
2. OSR Core Value (See : Performance Evaluation) 1. Voyage Comparison for your prioritization y g
p
y
p
(Least time/Least Fuel/On‐Time/Least Cost/Safety First)
2. Voyage Planning for ship master to keep confirmed your business prioritization 3 Target Management (En route time/RTA/FOC/RPM)
3.
Target Management (En route time/RTA/FOC/RPM)
4. Asset Management ( Performance / Proforma / Ship Ranking )
2. OSR Core Value (See: Performance Evaluation) 1. Voyage Comparison for your prioritization y g
p
y
p
(Least time/Least Fuel/On‐Time/Least Cost/Safety First)
2. Voyage Planning for ship master to keep confirmed your business prioritization 3 Target Management (En route time/RTA/FOC/RPM)
3.
Target Management (En route time/RTA/FOC/RPM)
4. Asset Management ( Performance / Proforma / Ship Ranking )
3. Case Study
Clarification
<1> Route Optimization
Support for Quickest Arrival Voyage against heavy Wx
<2> RTA Optimization
Support for RTA Adjustment in speed control
<3> RPM Optimization
Support for Least fuel with constant RPM
<4> Speed Allocation
Support for Least fuel with Speed control during heavy Wx
<5> Current/Tidal Effect
Support for Least fuel in use of effect of Tidal/Ocean Current
17
17
3. Case Study (Cape)
<1> Route Optimization
<2> RTA Optimization
<3> RPM Optimization
<5> Current/Tidal Effect
/ d l ff
(A)
1 Master set RPM 70 as Eco Speed
1.
Master set RPM 70 as Eco Speed
2. WNI Suggested RPM 62 for fuel saving
(B)
1. WNI suggested route for better current
2. Master followed our new route. (A) Fuel Savings due to RPM Optimization ：153MT
(B) Fuel Savings due to Route Optimization
Fuel Savings due to Route Optimization ： 6MT
Total Estimated Fuel Savings
: 159MT
18
3. Case Study (Panamax)
<1> Route Optimization
<2> Speed Allocation
<3> Current/Tidal Effect
Effect of Ocean Curret “Kuroshio”
Effect of Ocean Curret
Kuroshio
Total Estimated Fuel Savings : 33MT
19
3. Case Study (Tanker)
<2>
<2> RTA Optimization
RTA O ti i ti
<3> RPM Optimization
Departure : NW Australia (11/27)
p
Arrival : Brisbane (12/09)
Fuel Saved: 38MT Voyage Planning Sheet was quickly updated as per RTA (Required Time of Arrival) change advised by operator after discussing with consignee to take second tidal window to save fuel and still meet refinery requirements.
f l d till
t fi
i
t
Master cooperated in adjusting speed.
20
3. Case Study (Container)
<1> Route Optimization
<1> Route Optimization
Dep: BALBOA / Mar‐06th
Arr : TAIPEI / Mar‐29th
‐
‐
‐
Diversion for Safety to avoid heavy wx
Added 138 miles but saved 89mt FO
Added 138 miles but saved 89mt FO Master followed route by good 3‐way‐
communication Save 89MT 3. Case Study (PCTC)
<1> Route Optimization
<1> Route Optimization
Dep: IRAGO / June‐17th
Arr : BALBOA / July‐6th
‐
‐
‐
Master’s route 7991nm/789mt WNI’ss Suggested 7886nm/781mt
WNI
Suggested 7886nm/781mt
followed route by good 3‐way‐communication Save 8MT
Save 8MT Sug
4. EXSITE Voyage
Daily performance Monitoring 4. EXSITE Voyage
Target Management 4. EXSITE Voyage
Performance E al ation /Asset Management
Performance Evaluation /Asset Management 5. Where we are now, and where we are going ?
Data base marketing
Performance
Demonstrated Ship performance ranking DB (Low performer / High performer) Fleet
Optimal Fleet deployment
L
Loop Management M
t (Proforma Management) (P f
M
t)
Asset management
Business
Annual business (Fleet) planning Business Planning ( Cost Management )
Leg  voyage(Loop/Round)  annual fleet planning Pacific Ocean
Good Weather Definition
W
Wave Height < 1.25[m] (DSS‐3)
H i h 1 2 [ ] ( SS 3)
Wind Speed < 16[knots] (BF‐4)
100%
90%
80%
Oakland to Hong Kong
６０５０NM
６５００NM
70%
60%
50%
Bad Wx
40%
Good Wx
30%
Data Sampling Position: D t S
Data Sampling Period:
li P i d
Jan‐01/2009 ‐ Dec‐31/2011
20%
10%
0%
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Month
8
9
10
11
12
Atlantic Ocean
Good Weather Definition
Wave Height < 1 25[m] (DSS 3)
Wave Height < 1.25[m] (DSS‐3)
Wind Speed < 16[knots] (BF‐4)
100%
90%
80%
Rotterdam to New York
３４００NM
３５００NM
70%
60%
50%
Bad Wx
Bad Wx
40%
Good Wx
30%
Data Sampling Position: D t S
Data Sampling Period:
li P i d
Jan‐01/2009 ‐ Dec‐31/2011
20%
10%
0%
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Month
8
9
10
11
12
6. Capability Global Center Amsterdam Center Oklahoma Center Japan Euro U.S.