A PRIL / M AY 2007 N Z ’ S A U T H O R I T Y O N F O O D T E C H N O L O G Y, R E S E A R C H A N D M A N U FA C T U R I N G FEATURED IN THIS ISSUE: Laboratory supplies and services Exhibiting – how to get the best out of your trade show Conference Reports: Allergen Seminar, Sensory Workshop, Confectionery Manufacturers’ THE OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE NEW ZEALAND INSTITUTE OF FOOD SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY INC. EDITOR’S NOTE From the Editor Allergens, confectionery, laboratory services and materials, biofuels, trade shows – there is certainly a diverse range of material in this issue – lots of informative reading. Added to that is our discussion document, which poses the question “What’s in a name” (with apologies to Will Shakespeare), which will hopefully, get the ball rolling on an Institute-wide exchange of views exploring ways to build awareness of food technology in the wider marketplace. Your journal is one of the vehicles by which we can �spread the word’. Do you know someone who would benefit from receiving the journal? Please tell our mailing list manager Dave, [email protected], so he can ensure that they are on the list. I’d like to extend a welcome to the Pork Industry Board, which will run a regular column in the journal. Members of the Board and pork manufacturers will also begin receiving the journal. We are already looking ahead to Conference and its concurrent Trade Show. That is why I asked Barry Denton, known to nearly everyone, to share his exhibiting smarts. Barry’s idiosyncratic style makes good reading and contains many nuggets of wisdom, for sellers and buyers. We’re all engaged in selling or buying at some stage in our work, so trade shows impact on us all. Occasionally I am asked if I have any trouble finding enough material for this magazine. It’s quite the reverse, in fact. I am fortunate in having loyal support from NZIFST members, who supply much of the material, both unsolicited and on request. So, thank you, it’s much appreciated. One area where we occasionally struggle is in photographs, but Dave Pooch and I have a cunning plan to fix that – more next issue. News that GlaxoSmithKline Consumer Healthcare, the maker of Ribena, has accepted 15 representative charges brought by the Commerce Commission relating to a mis- leading product claim has had coverage in the daily media. In fact, the original Ribena concentrate, which features in the �river of blackcurrants’ advertisment, does contain significant Vitamin C. However, the Ribena brand name has been used on a range of ready to drink products, which aren’t a good source of vitamin C. Anne Scott As food technologists we must wonder where the communication breakdown happened? Did the company’s technical staff know the vitamin C content of the finished product? Did they tell the marketing people? Did anyone think out loud when they looked at the label statement and laboratory analyses? Are there other �Ribenas’ out there? GlaxoSmithKline have posted their statement on the case at www.ribena.co.nz. The subject is also discussed on en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ribena Unfortunately, for the Ribena brand the damage has been done. Later this year Food New Zealand will explore the issue of communication between marketing and technical departments in food companies; the Ribena case has highlighted an example where, quite possibly, communication broke down. Errata: Apologies to Rufus Turner and Carlene McLean (not Turner) who work at Crop and Food (not HortResearch). They were misnamed and moved by mistake in the report on the Functional Foods 2006 Seminar report, last issue. Anne Scott, Editor From the President As always we have a great line up of speakers for our annual conference in June. The theme is of importance to the future growth and prosperity of our food industry and the presentations are sure to be interesting and even provocative. There is a good diversity of sessions and a trade display that will cater to our members’ needs, so you should be there. There is sure to be something of interest to you and the networking opportunities cannot be beaten. If you are an employer dig deep into your budget and invest in your business and your staff by sending as many as possible to conference. If you are an employee whose employer needs some encouragement, how about doing a promotion on NZIFST to your boss? Leave some copies of the Food Journal on their desk or in the tearoom and read out items when they are around, give them an NZIFST brochures (your Branch Committee or the Executive Manager can provide copies), get them added to the Nibbles newsletter email list, show them 2 Food New Zealand the NZIFST website, highlight key sessions of the conference programme that will be of benefit to you and the company and send the conference flyers around the business and stick them up where everyone can see them. So I look forward to seeing you all at conference, a time to network, learn, hear the latest and Sally Hasell honour the successes of our industry and fellow food scientists and technologists. And all for a very modest investment! Sally Hasell, President, NZIFST Contacts New Zealand Institute of Food Science & Technology (Inc.) Rosemary Hancock, Executive Manager PO Box 8031, Palmerston North, New Zealand Phone: 021 217 8298 or 06 356 1686 Fax: 06 356 1687 Email: [email protected] Website: www.nzifst.org.nz NZ’S AUTHORITY ON FOOD TECHNOLOGY, RESEARCH AND MANUFACTURING A PRIL / M AY 2007 Meat Industry Association of New Zealand Caryll Shailer, Chief Executive PO Box 345, Wellington Phone: 04 473 6465 Fax: 04 473 1731 Email: [email protected] 2 4 8 16 | VOLUME 7, NO. 2 ISSN 1175 – 4621 Editorials In-brief Overview: Laboratory materials and services Allergen Seminar Anne Scott 18 Trade shows, why show and why go? Barry Denton New Zealand Pork Industry Board Sam McIvor Chief Executive Officer New Zealand Pork Industry Board DDI: 64 4 917 4754 Fax: 64 4 385 8522 Mob: 029 438 8222 Next editorial and advertising deadline: 11th May 2006 Features for June issue: Overview: Cleaning – chemicals and equipment NZIFST Conference preview Report on the Ice Cream Manufacturers Conference Cover image, of Philippa Hammond in the Massey Palmerston North pilot plant, courtesy of Massey University 20 What’s in a name? Dave Pooch and Anne Scott 24 Taking care of the business – Mike Rockell, entrepreneur Anne Scott 26 27 Confectionery Manufacturers’ Conference Report Oils and Fats news Laurence Eyres 28 Traveller’s Tale; The feel-good fill up Neil Betteridge 31 38 NZIFST News MIA News 46 Careers reports 49 50 Sensory Workshop report Despatches from our roving reporter Ali Spencer Jenny Dee and others David Pooch 51 Conference Diary Compiled by David Everett Peppermint Press 5 Rupi Court, Mt Wellington P O Box 11 530, Ellerslie, Auckland 1542 New Zealand Phone/Fax 64 9 527 8449 www.peppermintpress.co.nz Publisher and Managing Editor Anne Scott, Peppermint Press Limited – [email protected] Director and Writer David Pooch, Peppermint Press Limited – [email protected] Advertising Mike and Sally Dimond – [email protected], 09 444 1836 Copyright © 2007 Peppermint Press No part of this publication may be reproduced or copied in any form by any means (graphic, electronic, or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, taping information retrieval systems, or otherwise) without the written permission of Peppermint Press. The views expressed in this journal are those of the writers and do not necessarily represent the view of the Publisher, the Scientific review board, NZIFST, or MIA. Layout Hart Design – [email protected] Regular Contributors Laurence Eyres, Alison Spencer, Laurie Melton, Owen McCarthy, Charles Brennan, Lynley Drummond, David Everett, Sally Hasell Chairman Scientific Review Board Dr Owen McCarthy – [email protected] Published by Peppermint Press Limited Printed by MH Print Notice to Contributors When submitting editorial for Food New Zealand please observe the following, Editorial to be submitted as plain text files, NO FORMATTING please. Images should be sent as high resolution .jpg or .tiff files. Do not embed images in word documents, send separate files. Any images smaller than 500 kb may not be printed as the clarity of the print may be compromised. Advertisers Please refer to rate cards or Mike and Sally Dimond, [email protected], 64 9 444 1836 for sizes. ENDORSED BY THE MEAT INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION OF NEW ZEALAND & THE PORK INDUSTRY BOARD April / May 2007 3 IN-BRIEF In-brief New Chief Executive at Zespri Tony Nowell has assumed the role of Chief Executive of Zespri. He has extensive experience of the Asian and European markets, both important growth areas for Zespri, having spent 12 years in general management roles in Asia, and seventeen years working for French companies L’Oreal and Danone. He is an avid supporter of initiatives to improve New Zealand’s business environment, devoting his time and leadership to a number of influential New Zea- Tony Nowell land organisations. He is immediate past Chair of the New Zealand Food and Grocery Council, Chair of the New Zealand Packaging Accord Governing Board and the ASEAN New Zealand Combined Business Council, CoChair of the Government’s Food and Beverage Task Force and Deputy Chairman of Leadership New Zealand. He has also recently been appointed as a New Zealand representative to the APEC Business Advisory Council. New face at Advanced Packaging Advanced Packaging Systems Ltd are pleased to announce the recent appointment of Graeme Williamson to the role of product manager for the conveyor belting and Silverson high shear mixer segments of the business. Graeme has 20 years experience in the manufacturing and sales of specialty mesh and metal conveyor products. Graeme Williamson His thorough understanding of conveying requirements across a wide range of industries allows him to advise clients on how to best set up or improve their handling of materials on the move. Industries covered include: frozen foods, bakery, snack foods, poultry, seafood and confectionery industries. On the Mixing side, Graeme will be promoting and selling the internationally recognised range of Silverson high shear mixers. These mixers are used extensively where the rapid dispersion of powders into solution is required. In some cases, mixing times can be reduced by up to 90% when compared to conventional stirring methods. Advanced Packaging Systems Ltd has a range of demonstration mixers available for free trials ranging from the ability to process a few litres right through to hundreds of thousands of litres. 4 Food New Zealand Tate & Lyle ANZ expands regional presence From 1 April, Tate & Lyle’s new Australasian subsidiary is set to assume responsibility from Danisco for the distribution of Krystar crystalline fructose in the region. The company will also manage the distribution of Tate & Lyle food ingredients (including modified starches, polydextrose, sweeteners and acidulants in New Zealand), previously managed by Bronson & Jacobs. “Our strategy is to offer the most comprehensive range of value added ingredients to the Australasian market. This means wider choice for our customers and new opportunities in ingredients blending.” said Faye Bowyer, general manager. The division, which forms part of Tate & Lyle’s Global Food Ingredients Group, was established to help the ingredients firm focus on the Australian and New Zealand food and beverage industry. It already distributes ingredients for Nutrinova (sweeteners and sorbates), Wild Flavors (flavours), Innova (savoury flavours) and SunOpta (fibres). Nutrition Foundation roles New Zealand trained Dietitian, Kelsey Woodcock, has returned from her O.E recently to take up a newly established role at the New Zealand Nutrition Foundation. The Nutrition Foundation is expanding to meet the growing need for credible and consistent nutrition information. Kelsey worked as a dietitian in both the corporate sector and public health before heading overseas to broaden her professional experience even further. The Foundation also welcomes a new Chair. Fiona Carruthers, Nutrition Manager at the New Zealand Beef and Lamb Marketing Bureau, who moves from her existing Council role to become the first industry-based Chair. Kelsey Woodcock IN-BRIEF 14th HACCP Conference The 14th Australian HACCP Conference will be held from 30 July to 3 August 2007, on the Gold Coast Queensland. The HACCP Conference is the premier discussion forum for all food industry professionals involved in food safety. Each year the conference attracts a loyal following of those involved in the development, implementation and maintenance of food safety programmes. Some of the topics to be discussed this year include pest control, criminal law and legal strategies, high risk foods, cleaning for allergen control, packaging, ozone issues and much more all in the context of food safety. For further information on the Conference, sponsorship, trade display or the HACCP Awards visit the website www.haccptown.com, or email [email protected] 2007 Packaging Council Awards The CALL FOR ENTRIES for the Packaging Council 2007 Awards for Environmentally Acceptable Packaging is on NOW! Every two years the Packaging Council of New Zealand invites industry to submit entries which demonstrate the environmental standards and initiatives being achieved in New Zealand by manufacturers, wholesalers, brand owners, retailers, fillers, young designers, users of packaging and those in the recovery industry. The Awards programme aims to recognise and reward those who are making a significant contribution to improve the environmental performance of packaging, packaging systems and environmental education, or the operation of their manufacturing facilities. More information is available on the Packaging Council’s website: http://www.packaging.org.nz/awards/awards.php. Or contact Deb Statham – Awards Project Manager on [email protected] (mobile 021 706 455 / 07 839 7211) or Paul Curtis at the Packaging Council ([email protected]) if you are interested in entering or have a customer or supplier who you think should enter. April / May 2007 5 IN-BRIEF NORM’S NOTES Wine Haze Research Nanotechnology Put briefly, nanotechnology is the ability to measure, see, manipulate and manufacture materials at usually between 1 and 100 nanometres. A nanometre is one billionth of a metre and a human hair is roughly 100,000 nanometres wide. Although the food industry has been involved with aspects of nanotechnology for some time, this emerging science now offers much more in the field of food formulation, processing and packaging. However, Erich Windhab, a scientist at the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology’s food processing laboratory, has emphasised the need for caution introducing new products based on nanotechnology to consumers. Many may be fearful of the new science in a reaction akin to that experienced with the introduction of genetically modified foods and be resentful of having it “pushed down their throats”. Already, the Swiss group has used microcapsules with a size of 50 to 100 microns with Vitamin A, iodine and iron compounds encapsulated in the size range of about 5 microns (about 5000 nanometres). These nutrients are missing from the soil and hence the foods grown and eaten in rural Morocco so the effect of their use in a study of 159 school children aged between 6 and 14 years of age was dramatic. There was a significant reduction of iodine deficiency and anaemia. Work is continuing on applying similar techniques but at a smaller size to other foods and processes so that it will be possible to tailor food microstructures to meet the needs of communities similar to the Moroccan one. Other work in nanotechnology includes biopolymers in solutions, gels, and films. One study found functional nanostructures can incorporate individual biological molecules, an approach which is useful in the development of biosensors that can use natural sugars or proteins as targetrecognition groups. Such areas include the development of functional ingredients such as drugs, vitamins, antimicrobials, antioxidants, flavourings, colourants, and preservatives. With the application of nanotechnology in the food industry moving apace, research institutes and governments are looking at regulation of the technology. In doing so, let us not forget the role of that valuable entity, the consumer. Norman Lodge 6 Food New Zealand A Lincoln University summer scholarship has developed new protocols for characterising the hazes that can form in wines, opening the way for further work to explain the process of haze formation. Lyndon Green, a summer scholar under the supervision of Dr Roland Harrison established a set of protocols of haze collection by three methods. These methods were applied to a range of fined and unfined sauvignon blanc wines from five Marlborough vineyards following a Marlborough Wine Research Centre trial looking at the relationship between irrigation levels and rates of bentonite fining. “Initial results suggest fined wines form less haze and haziness as measured by nephelometry, compared to unfined wines,” says Dr Harrison. Dr Harrison says the next phase of the research is to use capillary electrophoresis (CE) to investigate the effects of various reagents to disperse haze components. Arrangements have been made with Marlborough Wine Research Centre in preparation for this. Haze in wine is a significant issue for the industry. The most frequent cause is protein-polyphenol interaction. Although a clear wine can be achieved relatively easily by fining and filtration, the problem for the producer is to ensure that the product remains “brilliantly” clear for a reasonable period (say, four or five years). This is usually achieved by carrying out fining trials to determine the level of bentonite needed to prevent a haze from forming. Often, and particularly with sauvignon blanc, standard tests indicate much greater levels of bentonite than the winemaker feels is desirable, because of the effect on varietalcharacter and the volume of sediment Lyndon Greening is the latest in a series of post-graduate students from Lincoln University to be awarded a summer scholarship, which aim to address specific questions with direct application to industry. Lincoln University’s Food and Wine Group is New Zealand’s major provider of multi-disciplinary research and teaching for the wine industry. IN-BRIEF What’s in a grapefruit? An NZIFST member recently asked... �Many people the world over – most suffering a heart condition/angina – take medicines with the warning: “do not take/avoid grapefruit and its juice”. Why? Is this a food technology or biochemical or pharmaceutical problem? We asked for help from NZIFST members. In brief, it is all three. First, the biochemical problem is caused by compounds called furancoumarins that are contained in grapefruit juice. These inhibit an enzyme in the gut which normally �chews’ up drugs taken orally before they are absorbed into the blood stream, thereby reducing the drug’s availability. Secondly, drinking grapefruit juice causes more of a drug to be absorbed into the blood stream, thereby creating a (potentially serious or lethal) pharmaceutical problem as the drugs’ effects and side effects are increased – leading to toxicity. As an aside, one reader noted, this effect is being researched as a potential means of better delivery of some drugs. How much grapefruit juice would you need to drink to cause this effect? As another reader noted, you would need to drink one litre of grapefruit juice per day. (Warning – we strongly advise that you do not drink grapefruit juice as a way of trying to lower the dose of the drug you are taking!!) Thirdly, it is also a food technology problem because, as a reader noted, the implicated compounds, furancoumarins, actually give the juice its flavour and �some manufacturers may add furanocoumarin-rich grapefruit oil to boost the flavour.’ Which helps to explain why drinking the grapefruit juice is usually discussed in the literature rather than the fresh grapefruit. So what drugs are affected by grapefruit juice? Our readers sent in a huge list of drugs that could be affected. Most agreed that blood pressure and cholesterol lowering drugs (statins) are particularly implicated. However, we strongly advise that you consult with your doctor about any possible effects and side effects grapefruit juice might have on whatever medication you are taking and always read the drug information sheet. Finally, one reader raised a whole new question about whether the grapefruit referred to in all the literature is the same as our home grown variety: “I understand that [our grapefruit] is a cultivar derived from a Chinese citrus fruit, and which probably has quite a different chemical profile… [and] has often been named as the �Poor Man’s Orange’, and as far as I know has no significant genetic connection with the US or Caribbean product.” In conclusion, grapefruit juice contains furancoumarins that impact on oral pharmaceuticals by inhibiting a gut enzyme thereby causing more of the drug to be absorbed into the blood stream, leading to potentially lethal drug levels in our body. Our advice is simple - if you are taking any medication always err on the side of caution, seek and follow medical guidance. But you may not have to avoid all citrus fruit and anyway, according to one reader �Oranges, mandarins and tangelos are far superior, especially if they are grown in New Zealand.’ Cut your mixing time by up to 90% Silverson high shear Batch mixers offer unrivalled speed and versatility and can cut mixing times by up to 90%. Easily interchangeable rotor/stator workheads allow each machine to mix, homogenise, dissolve, disperse, disintegrate or emulsify a wide variety of products. ADVANCED PACKAGING SYSTEMS LIMITED Ph: 09 966 3360 AdvancedPackaging Silverson.indd 1 Fax: 09 966 3361 Email: [email protected] www.silverson.co.nz 2/11/06 1:37:34 PM April / May 2007 7 LABORATORIES Laboratories – facilities and equipment Laboratory testing is inherent in food manufacturing. Whether in house, where equipment and consumables must be sourced, or outsourced, when services must be accessed and systems monitored, a food company needs its laboratory. We have asked suppliers of services and materials and equipment to tell us about their offerings Making micro testing easier The 3M Staph express pack The 3M Petrifilm™ Staph Express Count Plate Food laboratories around the world place high priority on routine Staphylococcus aureus testing since enumeration of this bacterium is commonly used as an indication of food quality and safety. Early identification of potential contamination is important since food borne staphylococcal intoxication is recognised as being a leading cause in reported bacterial food borne illness. For a long time, the need in the food and beverage industry was to have a cost effective, easy to use, faster result test for S. aureus. Based on those needs, 3M Microbiology developed a test that provides a final result in as little as 22 hours versus up to 78 hours with the three-plate Baird-Parker agar plus tube coagulase method. After inoculation with 1mL of sample and incubation at 35°C, the plate is ready for interpretation. If S. aureus is present, distinct red-violet colonies appear in as few as 22 hours. When 8 Food New Zealand colony colours other than red-violet are present, the 3M Petrifilm Staph Express disk is used to distinguish S. aureus from other suspect colonies. Easy testing and interpretation means less chance of human error, and with the time saved in S. aureus testing, laboratory personnel are freed up for other responsibilities. 3M Petrifilm Staph Express Count plates are available globally allowing multinational food manufacturers and processors to standardise their test methods. 3M has completed its acquisition of Biotrace International PLC. The acquisition will enhance 3M’s core food processing safety business while also enabling 3M to expand into adjacent health care markets. Biotrace specialises in the development and manufacture of hygiene monitors, tests for salmonella, listeria and e-coli, ATPbased milk sterility tests, and a variety of laboratory supplies for food testing labs. In addition to food service products, Biotrace provides rapid tests and laboratory consumables for environmental monitoring and quality control in a wide range of industrial and defence applications. LABORATORIES Microbiology at the speed of light Soleris™ real-time microbiology system Traditional microbiological testing methods are a time-consuming bottleneck for many processors. This is because most standard methods require preparation of samples, lengthy incubation and subsequent counting or interpretation of results. Biolab NZ would like to introduce you to a real-time microbiology system from Neogen – Soleris™ The Soleris™ system enables you to screen raw materials or products for early detection of contamination – ensuring higher quality, longer shelf life and greater value for your brands. Soleris™ is an ideal tool to help with HACCP compliance. Problematic spots can be easily identified, monitored and mapped. By providing trend analysis and multiple format reports with a simple click of the mouse, Soleris™ helps management to ensure that all critical control points are stable and alerts the user of any deviation. Soleris™ uses optical assay technology that measures microbial growth by monitoring pH and other biochemical reactions that generate a colour change as microorganisms in the broth grow and metabolise. The results are displayed by colour-coded monitoring with an alert on samples out of specification. Sensitivity of the technology ranges from a single organism per vial to 107 to 108 CFU/ml (upper limit). The Soleris™ COLIFORM Test has AOAC certification for a variety of foods and provides reliable results – usually in hours instead of days. The system allows you to configure the Soleris models to test from 1 to 1,024 samples at one time, so it can be easily upgraded to fit your changing needs. Available assays: Enterobacteriaceae; Yeasts and moulds; E.coli; total viable count, lactic acid bacteria, Staphylococcus, Pseudomonas, Listeria spp, biological indicators and others. Industrial applications include beverages, wine, nutraceuticals, meat, dairy, poultry, seafood, fruits and vegetables, environmental swabs, chocolates and candies, eggs and others. Fort Richard Laboratories – rapid testing When most people think “Microbiology”, they think of the clinical markets such as hospital laboratories. However, with the ever-tightening standards of food hygiene and customer awareness, the onus is on food manufacturers and handlers to ensure their product is free from dangerous bacteria, toxins and potential allergens. Having the confidence of knowing your product has been adequately tested can ensure you stay in business. “There are numerous ways of testing for microbes or contaminants in food, says Fort Richard’s Brendon Clist. Traditional microbiology is the most accurate way to identify April / May 2007 9 LABORATORIES and enumerate any potentially dangerous microorganisms in your product – this process involves collection of sample, dilution, and then pipetting onto growth media to enable reading of results in 24-48 hours. However, this is relatively time consuming, and so rapid test methods become desirable, especially if your manufacturing and distribution process requires a fast turn around. Neogen Corporation are the world’s biggest specialist company providing rapid tests not only for pathogenic and spoilage bacteria, but for many different allergens such as soy, gluten, peanut, histamine etc. These tests range from simple-to-use lateral flow strips to quantitative kits with specificity down to 2 ppb. Of course, for the best results, your food processing equipment must be as clean as possible. So the need for testing the hygiene of equipment before your manufacturing run is important. For this type of testing there are rapid presence/absence tests available with a result time of ± 10 minutes. These tests work simply on detecting traces of food – proteins, sugars etc that could be harbouring bacteria. For a more accurate quantitative result, a hygiene check slide is used. This method will tell you how many bacteria per cm2 of machinery surface are present – you will get a result in ± 24 hours. There are many options for testing and HACCP verification and you can be assured that the right test with the right parameters will be available. Fort Richard Laboratories Ltd supply the complete range of Neogen food safety solutions, as well as manufacturing all culture media required for quantitative results in food microbiology. Laboratory services The Kiestra cutting-edge microbiology technology system Automated microbiology at Agriquality Consumers today want verification that what they’re eating is healthy and safe and, as that proof increasingly comes in the form of scientific evidence, good laboratory testing equals solid, reliable food quality assurance. Keeping at the forefront of science-based technological developments is key to providing first-rate laboratory testing. That’s why leading food safety and biosecurity company, AgriQuality, has invested seven million dollars in an automation project known as Kiestra. Kiestra, a cutting-edge microbiology technology system, has been put into action at two of AgriQuality’s laboratory sites – Auckland and Melbourne. The initial installation in Auckland was the first of its kind in the Southern Hemisphere, and quickly confirmed its worth, increasing testing capacity significantly. The Kiestra automatically calibrated machinery consistently and aseptically prepares and processes test plates. This not only notably reduces inconsistencies and the prospect of contamination and human error, but also relieves scientists of much of the mundane handling of microbiology testing, leaving them free to interpret results and carry out specialised analyses. The fully installed Auckland system allows customers to view photographic images of test plates online. This data, stored electronically, provides an entirely traceable and permanent record of food testing results. Laboratory staff say they’re already reaping benefit from the absolute accuracy that Kiestra provides. The machine scans, records and counts plates, which offers real-time traceability and faster results. It has trebled throughput and guarantees improved turnaround times. AgriQuality’s microbiology laboratories use both traditional .:,!"3YOURlRSTCHOICETHROUGHOUT .EW:EALANDFORALLYOURTESTINGNEEDS .:,!"3PROVIDINGANALYTICALSERVICESFOR w!GRICULTURAL w(ORTICULTURAL w&OOD w%NVIRONMENTAL w0HARMACEUTICAL w/UTSOURCEDLABORATORIES WWW.:,!"3CONZ !UCKLAND(AMILTON(ASTINGS2EEFTON#HRISTCHURCH$UNEDIN 10 Food New Zealand LABORATORIES and modern rapid technologies to offer a range of services including shelf life testing, food poisoning and spoilage investigations, contaminant trace-backs, cost method development and special projects. They provide national coverage with microbiological testing facilities in Auckland, Wellington and Christchurch. With a network of eight laboratories across New Zealand and Australia, each with its own specialised capabilities, AgriQuality is the largest independent food and environmental testing organisation in Australasia. Method validation for foods at Cawthron The New Zealand food industry is growing – and not just in volume. The number of different products is increasing rapidly, in a drive to add value to foods in local and international markets. Commercial contract laboratories are required to provide accurate results for label claims and active ingredient concentrations that are able to withstand international scrutiny. The number of different products with a plethora of ingredients poses a challenge for analytical laboratories. Old methods, developed and validated for a specific matrix, are often found to produce erroneous results when applied to these new products. In most cases it is not possible to fully validate a test for each individual product. Cawthron operates a comprehensive system of routine checks designed to provide an early warning to the laboratory staff if a test is not suitable for a specific product. Cawthron’s Senior Scientist Dr. Pat Holland, supported by a team of dedicated method development staff, provides invalu- Cawthron’s hi-tech laboratory equipment used in food analyses able support to our technicians in the routine testing laboratory. Using Pat’s extensive international experience working in method validation, this unique team is available to help customers with their method development needs for any product. Vitamin C in soft drinks, Vitamins A, D, E and K in oils and fats, inorganic arsenic in food, and glucosamine and chondroitin in dietary supplements, are a few examples of the recently developed product-specific methods. From the start of the project, until the final report, our experts remain in close contact with the customer, to ensure their needs are met. Materials Characterisation for the Food Industry Microstructural analysis? Contaminant materials? Cleaning problems? The Research Centre for Surface and Materials Science can help with these issues and more. Using state of the art equipment, backed by University expertise, RCSMS can: • identify materials; • explain surface phenomena such as staining; • image microstructure – including dynamic processes such as the salt crystallization sequence shown on the left. For more information contact: [email protected] April / May 2007 11 FORT RICHARD LABORATORIES: SUPPLIERS OF Nutrition laboratory at Massey University MICROBIOLOGY PRODUCTS AccuClean™ provides an immediate indicator of sanitation by measuring food residue on equipment and food contact areas. FAIL FAIL MARGINAL PASS For all your food microbiology needs Fort Richard has the answer... 1 2 3 Prepared and Dehydrated Culture Media Rapid Pathogen/Allergen testing solutions Equipment hygiene testing Hygiene Check Slide Phone: 09-276 5569 • Fax: 09-276 9883 12 Food New Zealand [email protected] Nutrition labelling is now a mandatory FSANZ requirement for the majority of food products. The Nutrition Laboratory at Massey University in Palmerston North offers an extensive range of services including tests for specialised products such as organic or those with unusual ingredients, not on standard data bases. Computer labelling is an economical option requiring a list of ingredients and their weights. “To complement the labelling service the we also offer a range of testing services, including trans fatty acids. This is an expanding area that is currently being debated as to whether it should become law to include on all Nutrition Information Panels,” says Nutrition Laboratory manager, Felicity Jackson. Shelf life testing is also available along with accelerated shelf life testing for specific products. Consultancy in product development such as improvements in consistency, taste, and utilising different ingredients is also available in the Institute of Food, Nutrition & Human Health both in Palmerston North and Auckland. Quality results are assured with IANZ accreditation to ISO17025 with participation in international proficiency programs as part of our routine QA procedures. The Nutrition Laboratory is a registered MAF transitional facility, routinely accepting samples from other countries. Local facilities from NZLABS When choosing an analytical laboratory services provider, there are a number of important points to consider, including the provider’s level of capability and expertise, physical location of the laboratories and commitment to service. A major strength for NZLABS is having nationwide coverage through local laboratories. In the food industry turnaround time can be of huge importance and having laboratories in close proximity to you is a major benefit. NZLABS has analytical services based in: Auckland – chemistry, general microbiology, pathogen, pharmaceutical and stability rooms Hamilton – chemistry, general microbiology, pathogen, agriculture and horticulture Hastings – chemistry, general microbiology, pathogen Christchurch – general microbiology and a fully contained pc2 pathogen laboratory We also have two outsourced laboratories in Dunedin and Reefton. Continuous improvement, IANZ and GMP accreditation means NZLABS is able to offer the latest in analytical services to you. NZLABS values its staff; Brian Watson, General manager of NZLABS says “we have made a commitment to invest in the latest technology and best people,” One such scientist is David Woollard who is world renowned for his work in vitamin testing. Opportunities to grow within the business are also available. Sara Hargraves has been an integral part of the NZLABS team since the inception of the Christchurch site in 2000. Her depth of experience, strong client focus and strong business acumen made her the perfect choice to lead our Business Development Team. Sara says “providing support, information and service to our clients is vital, NZLABS strives to be the best.” Sorensen Laboratories Sorensen Laboratories is an independent laboratory specialising in all areas of food technology and consultancy. Principal, Torben Sorensen has a deep understanding of the food industry and many years of local and international experi- Torben Sorensen ence. He enjoys a close working relationship with his clients and their technologists in a range of projects. Torben’s long involvement in the food industry has given him close working relationships with a group that includes engineers, other technologists and marketing experts. This team approach has enabled the creation of new products and systems, which have allowed New Zealand companies to break into markets that have not been previously accessible. Services are offered under a number of broad categories: Product and process development Quality control Shelf life extension Food safety programmes Claims and disputes Food technology services Sorensen Laboratories has won awards for their clients with a number of innovations, including awards for leadership in product and process development and for food safety. Now based in Puhoi just north of Auckland, the company is currently working with clients to bring technology developed overseas into New Zealand, ensuring clients in New Zealand are applying up to date technologies and trends. When you need to be sure COMMITTED TO NATIONAL COVERAGE Wouldn’t it be great if Australasia’s largest independent food and environmental testing organisation brought microbiological testing to your doorstep? Well, now we have! "HSJ2VBMJUZTMBCPSBUPSJFTJO"VDLMBOE 8FMMJOHUPOBOE$ISJTUDIVSDIPGGFS NJDSPCJPMPHJDBMUFTUJOHJODMVEJOH Coliform colonies SGS Consumer Testing Services, a division of the SGS Group, is the world’s leading verification, testing and certification company. SGS Laboratory Services covers food, environmental, ingredient and product testing: Food: nutritional composition/information, fatty acid profiles, antioxidants, preservatives. Protein meals and animal/fish by-products analysed for export requirements Environmental: Water; potable, effluent, trade waste sampling TCLP analysis of leachable contaminants, soil, TPH Pesticide residues, organics and heavy metals, Timber; Boron, CCA, IPBC, Azoles Pharmaceutical assay and impurities by BP, USP or in-house methods Microbiology: drinking water, dairy, meat, foods, drugs and pharmaceuticals, cosmetics, perfumes and essential oils. “Testing complements the findings collected during process assessments and product inspections and helps to position your private label products in the market,” says John Harvey, laboratory manager at SGS Penrose, Auckland facility. SGS Food Assessment Services throughout the supply chain are primarily HACCP-based and available individually or combined with relevant certification. Process assessments covering the production steps relevant to food safety and quality, in ac- t t t t t t t t t t t t t "FSPCJDQMBUFDPVOU #BDJMMVTDFSFVT $BNQZMPCBDUFS $MPTUSJEJVNQFSGSJOHFOT $PMJGPSNGBFDBMDPMJGPSN &DPMJ&DPMJ0) -JTUFSJB -JTUFSJBNPOPDZUPHFOFT 1PUBCMFBOE OPOQPUBCMFXBUFST 1TFVEPNPOPBTBFSHJOPTB 4BMNPOFMMB 4UBQIZMPDPDDVTBVSFVT :FBTUNPVMET $IPPTFUIFDPNQBOZUIBUTUBLJOH NJDSPCJPMPHZUPBOFXMFWFMXJUI BVUPNBUFECJPUFDIOPMPHZ For more information please contact: Freephone 0508 00 11 22 [email protected] | www.agriquality.com April / May 2007 13 LABORATORIES cordance with the NZFSA Food Safety Programme, are based on defined second or third-party schemes such as: GMP, ISO 22000, British Retail Consortium (BRC), Woolworths, Subway, Costco, Walmart, Marine Stewardship Council (MSC). We are also accredited for Winery Export Certification. The EurepGAP and Tesco Natures Choice (Fresh Fruit & Vegetable) protocols describe essential elements and develop best practice for global production of fresh produce and horticultural products. It demonstrates to customers a company’s commitment and ability to produce safe and clean food under an exhaustive system (HACCP) verified by an internationally recognised independent third party. SGS Agricultural Services is accredited by Biosecurity New Zealand (MAF) as an Independent Verification Agency (IVA) to provide a range of services to Export Certification for Plant and Plant Products. RCSMS at the University of Auckland The Research Centre for Surface and Materials Science (RCSMS) is New Zealand’s “one stop shop” for specialist materials and surface characterisation facilities including: Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM), Energy Dispersive Spectroscopy, X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS) and Atomic Force Microscopy. Clients from the food processing industry can easily access the expertise of RCSMS, which is based at the University of Auckland, for answers to a variety of food processing related issues. For example, in the case of particulate contamination of food it is likely that only a tiny sample is present but it is necessary to determine what the sample is in order to ascertain its source. RCSMS can identify the material in a non-destructive manner and requires only the tiniest amount to do so, far exceeding the capabilities of wet-chemistry techniques. The surface analytical capability of RCSMS, using XPS, can answer questions that arise during many aspects of food processing. For example issues such as failing adhesion in packaging or surface staining of product or of process equipment. In addition, the microstructural, and hence textural, characteristics of food can be investigated using the state-of-the-art electron microscope facilities at RCSMS. These facilities include cryo-SEM which was used to create the image of fresh and bloomed chocolate. Also RCSMS is proud to operate the country’s only environmental SEM, which allows the examination of hydrated samples in their native state. Soon to be added to the SEM suite is a tensile tester that can test the mechanical characteristics of food samples, such as stretchiness of cheese or crispness of fruit. δ Electron microscope cryo-SEM images of chocolate David Munro Consultants Ltd Strategic and technology planning Research and development management Development of technical people Dairy and food technology projects and training David Munro BSc BE(Chem)(Hons) MIChemE FNZIFST Mobile: 027 484 0952, Email: [email protected] 14 Food New Zealand Lab technicians view 3M results ADVERTORIAL Bronson and Jacobs expands its portfolio A relationship that spans over a decade and has seen 4 companies merge, is once again set to expand the portfolio at Bronson and Jacobs In 1995 B&J began representation of Lucas Meyer Lecithin who A recent Gallop Poll showed 9 out of 10 consumers link were acquired by Degussa Texturant systems in 2001. Degussa fibre to intestinal health, yet our average daily fibre intake falls Texturant Systems have now been fully integrated with their well short of the recommended daily intake of 30grams. The new owner, Cargill under the Cargill Texturising Solutions um- food industry is ready for options to offer consumers the health- brella. Thus, some innovative new developments are in the of- ful benefits of fibre in appealing products. Flour, cereal grains fering at B&J. The most exciting addition is the comprehensive and certain starches can be replaced by Actistar which boosts range of starches, complementing a range of hydrocolloids and the level of resistant starch and dietary fibre. In fact, when lecithins – which is now one of the largest in the world. compared to typical fibre, Actistar RM (resistant maltodextrin) Starch has certainly come a long way since it was first in- generates a higher level of butyrate, which helps promote the troduced primarily as a thickener in commercial food products. growth, development and maintenance of a healthy colon. This Nowadays, starches are as technically complex as any hydrocol- breakthrough range also boasts a low GI and Insulenemic re- loid and cover as diverse a range of applications sponse, has a smooth mouthfeel and bland flavour. It is ideal Cargill’s C* starches have been developed to fulfil the versatile needs of modern food processes. They offer major functional benefits and contribute to the overall quality of food and beverages. for products such as yoghurt, smoothies, flavoured milks, juices, sports drinks, moist cookies, brownies and muffins. To boost fibre levels further, Bronson and Jacobs can offer The Cargill C* range consists of both thinned and stabilised Actistar RT (tapioca starch). This product contains 80% total starches for a wide range of applications supported by Cargill’s dietary fibre and is a great replacement for flour. It has a low technical application expertise. water holding capacity allowing high levels of inclusions and a Complementing Bronson and Jacobs extensive range ingredients is the Actistar, Resistant Starch range. non gummy texture. Made from Tapioca, Actistar RT is ideal for use in low carb breads, baked goods and cereals. Bronson & Jacobs, the Vital Ingredient At Bronson and Jacobs, we don’t just sell ingredients. We create innovative ideas and solutions. As the largest distributor of ingredients in Australasia, Bronson and Jacobs now brings you an even greater range of food ingredients and innovation: Acidulants Sweeteners including �Neotame’ Natural and Artifi cial Colours �Functional Food’ ingredients Herbal extracts Hydrocolloids Preservatives Antioxidants Minerals including �Aquamin’ Flavours Phosphates Polydextrose Starches Proteins Call Us – Together with our team of Food Technologists and Product specialists, we can open doors for your business. Tel: 0508 366 363 Fax: 0508 366 364 P.O. Box 8886, Auckland 1035 Email: [email protected] Bronson & James 3rd page ad.indd 1 2/11/06 2:16:17 PM April / May 2007 15 ALLERGEN SEMINAR Safe food for all By Anne Scott The second NZFSA/NZIFST Allergen Seminar, held in Auckland on 21 March, was a successful combination of technical, clinical and personal information about a food issue affecting an increasing proportion of our population. Adverse food reactions are very common and often thought to be allergic in nature but true food allergy is present in 6 – 8% in children at one year, reducing throughout childhood to around 2.5 - 4% in adulthood. A milk drink can be life-threatening for a dairy allergy suffer The personal Still widely misunderstood, although not by genuine sufferers, an allergic reaction is our bodies’ immunological response to a challenge from a substance perceived as life threatening. Genuine allergens are proteins. For those whose life or quality of life is at risk due to their response to an allergen, constant vigilance is required. Kimberly Madden-Snoad, whose daughter is allergic to anything containing dairy, even to the extent of a touch from a person who has been handling dairy products, gave the audience a sober account of her family’s risk management programme. Kimberley’s daughter is also allergic to egg and has reacted to kiwifruit, walnuts and peas. Now that she is at school Kimberley’s vigilance must extend to asking the school to help her daughter keep herself safe. The school’s response? She must take responsibility – the five-year old, that is. Kimberley’s daughter is the sort of case that Amber-Parry Strong, a dietician working with allergic children, sees routinely. Going beyond the daily struggle to keep these children safe is the importance of adequate nutrition for children on restrictive diets – insufficient dietary fat; protein perhaps; micronutrient intake can be compromised. Consider the case of a dairy allergic child. No buttered (or �margarined’) toast for her, she learns early the delights of dipping bread in olive oil and fried foods become an essential source of dietary fat. The parents of allergic children can never assume that a food is safe, consequently a limited range of foods make up the diet risking deficiencies in micronutrients. The clinical Dr Penny Fitzharris is a specialist physician in clinical immunology in Auckland. Penny presented an excellent paper deepening our knowledge of the allergic world. She made a strong case for correct diagnosis in food allergy situations, making use of the standard prick test, (which may give a false positive result in 50% of cases, but gives a false negative in only 5% of cases) coupled with extensive interviewing to ascertain the patient’s history. “Skin prick testing, properly done, using appropriate reagents, and correctly read, will identify specificity in 100% of responses,” she said. Penny spent some time discussing the related area of nonimmunological food intolerance, which presents largely with gastrointestinal symptoms. These can generally be alleviated by dietary modification. She also pointed out that food additives are commonly suspected but rarely confirmed as the intolerance agent. The presentation was rounded off with statistics on deaths from anaphylaxis, noting that about one quarter of these are 16 Food New Zealand food related and generally caused by respiratory responses. Finally, deaths from anaphylaxis are most often caused by food in younger people (largest group under 5 years) and mostly caused by prescribed drugs in the 60 – 75 year age group. Regulatory Leigh Henderson, of FSANZ, and Ursula Egan and Janice Attrill, of NZFSA, reviewed the role of government agencies in allergen regulation and their management in the food supply. Leigh reviewed developments in regulation of labelling for allergens here and overseas, citing the Codex List, which is the basis for label declaration requirements in the EU, USA, Canada, New Zealand and Australia. (With minor additions in some countries). The Codex list: Cereals containing gluten Crustacea and their products Eggs and egg products Fish and fish products Peanuts, soybeans and their products Milk and milk products Tree nuts and their products Added Sulphites in concentrations of 10 mg/kg or more. New Zealand requires foods containing the above list, plus sesame, to be labelled for the presence of allergens as set out in Regulation 1.2.3. FSANZ is currently working on delineating the areas the upcoming Allergen Review will cover and Leigh discussed the topics under consideration. Just how should allergens be declared and what does and what doesn’t require labelling? Leigh discussed the �may contain’ blanket statement, which it seems, may be used by manufacturers simply to protect themselves from the consequences of unintended contamination, not to inform the consumer. FSANZ is also looking at requirements relating to foods exempt from labelling, that is, in the broad food service area. There is also the threshold question, greatly complicated by the difficulty of obtaining data which holds for all allergy suffers, however there are plans in some countries to require declarations only when allergens are above certain levels (which will be publicised). The question remains, will this help allergy sufferers? At NZFSA the work on ensuring the safety of allergen sufferers is being coordinated by a recently set up Internal Allergen Work Group, which is serving as the central point for a number governmental organisations’ work in the allergen area, considering the areas of communication, building awareness and building relationships with all stakeholders on allergen work being done by NZFSA. Janice Attrill is Advisor Event and Emergency Response at NZFSA. Product recalls are part of her work. She had some interesting statistics for delegates. About one third of all recalls are due to imported foods. About one third of all recalls are due to allergens, of which one third are due to dairy, about 22% nuts and soy and 11% eggs. Most are foods contaminated by, for example, a non-communicated change in an ingredient. Janice recommended the NZFSA website recalls section, www.nzfsa.govt.nz/recalls/index.htm which contains all you need to know about recalls – Janice told us so! Industrial matters When a company is considering its allergen policy, one of the areas that needs to be addressed is staff training. Agriquality’s Lynn Davies made a strong case for the benefits of properly planned and carried out in-house training of all staff in Allergen management – “awareness is not enough, mindset and attitude are critical” she asserted, “and this can only be developed through a proper training programme.” Of course trained staff need tools - allergen test methods that can be trusted, whether allergen protein traces are being sought in a food or on equipment. ESR’s Peter Cressey reiter- ated that �true’ food allergens are specific food proteins that cause an immunological response. Test methods suitable for food producers’ in-house testing are the so-called dipstick or lateral flow methods where extracted proteins are captured on coloured particles with antibodies attached. Particles are allowed to migrate through a support medium containing a zone of antibodies. A positive result is visible as a coloured line on a dipstick or test strip. Users of such �kits’ must be aware of their limitations. The detection level may be too high for security of results, a kit may not be validated for the substrate being tested. Hydrolysis or fermentation can modify a protein so it no longer shows a positive. Alternatively, the kit may detect down to levels lower than even the most sensitive of individuals would react to. A recently launched range of test kits now offers New Zealand manufacturers a much wider range of �quick’ allergen test proteins. Food Tech Solutions in Auckland is the local distributor and is currently offering sample kits to those who telephone with a request. Ph (09) 576 7326. A valuable seminar This one-day seminar for food manufacturers was well attended and covered the subject from all perspectives. Chair for the day, NZIFST President, Sally Hasell, commented in her final remarks that it was likely to become an annual event, due to the positive responses received from those attending. The audience gained significant information plus the seminar allowed NZFSA to obtain direct feedback from industry which could be used in their work managing regulatory matters relating to allergens. IMCD New Zealand Ltd (Formerly Swift New Zealand Limited) • Functional dietary fibres – Insoluble fibres: wheat / oat / apple / potato from JRS • Inulin / FOS Soluble fibres from Sensus • Rice Derivatives – Starch, Flour, Syrup,Protein, Stabilised Rice Bran • Fruit and Vegetables powders / flakes • Yeast Extracts for savoury enhancement • Caramel and Natural Colours • Dairy concentrate flavours from Butterbuds • Food gums and natural stabilisers • Natural vegetable and fruit actives As of 2 April 2007, Swift New Zealand will take its parent company name and will be known as IMCD New Zealand. Call us to discuss our natural and functional range of ingredients suited for all applications. Contact: Julie, Lara or Jo on 09 625 6169 April / May 2007 17 ALLERGEN SEMINAR The technical TRADE SHOWS Trade shows, why show and why go? By Barry Denton Wise-man of exhibiting, Barry Denton shares his wit and wisdom on the art of trade show exhibiting. This is a must-read article if you are considering exhibiting at the NZIFST conference. Trade show expert, Barry Denton As I started to compose this article, I decided to have a quick click onto Google to see what popped up to support my conviction that Trade Shows were still relevant in this “World of Web” of which we now find ourselves to be willing citizens. To be fair and accurate I entered the word �Trade Shows’ rather than Exhibitions just to make sure I didn’t get the local Community Centre’s finger-painting exhibition or the Women’s Institute Pressed Flowers and Preserves Show. Well, in 0.13 seconds Google told me there were 103 million references to trade shows which convinced me that trade shows are still valid as a component in the exchange of information about products and services between sellers and potential buyers. I have been involved in the New Zealand Exhibition Industry since 1975. My first show was the 1975 National Fieldays. My company was commissioned to design and build an outdoor exhibit for a client with an automated feeding system for chicken and pig sheds and apart from the �Helium Balloons’ incident, it was a jolly profitable experience for both my company and our clients. Trade Shows have been a vital part of the exchange of goods and services cycle for at least two thousand years. There is mention in the bible of a famous carpenter’s son who got moderately miffed when he found that one had encroached into a temple he happened to be visiting for the purpose of preaching and miracle performance. (I also have incurred the wrath of certain trade show organisers by extending my client’s exhibit over the designated threshold, thus showing that it was ever so.) Trade shows are created to provide a forum in order for companies servicing a common industry sector or purchasing group to show their wares. The reason they group together, despite the fact that they are often direct competitors, is to give potential buyers a big enough incentive to disturb their busy business lives by spending a day at a trade show. Simply put, companies go to the show to tell and sell and visitors go to the show to learn and buy. It is seldom taken into account (by exhibitors or visitors) that trade show visitors are actually competing within their own industry sector. This is, in fact, what drives business people through the trade show doors – they are seeking ways to get ahead of their competitors. It seems to be a perfect arrangement doesn’t it? It can be if you do it right. For the purpose of this article and its sequel in the next issue of Food New Zealand, I am going to assume that those of you reading it are tellers and sellers. I will cover trade show selec- 18 Food New Zealand tion, site selection, trade show budgeting, stand design, stand staffing and stand staff training, lead generation and follow-up systems (not necessarily in that order). When you get it all right you cannot fail to make sales. I’m going to tell you how to make sure you get the best return out of your trade show spend. Why exhibit? Remember, your competitors exhibit at trade shows for the same reason you do. To wit; you exhibit to persuade your competitors’ existing clients to consider your products and to capture the attention of their potential clients by showing that your product and services offers more benefits than theirs, to the inevitable conclusion of the consummation of the relationship with the exchange of title of a product to the mutual benefit and satisfaction of both parties -otherwise known as making a sale. I have often dealt with clients who are exhibiting at a trade show just because it is the easy option. Choosing to exhibit should be the result of careful consideration of the communication options available to your company. Here’s the list of options. You can send a letter to the potential customer telling them about your company and its product with an invitation, sometimes with an incentive reward, to come back to your company with an expression of interest. (This assumes you know their name and you are convinced the letter will actually get past the “Unsolicited-mail-Nazis” and onto their desk) You can make a phone call to the potential customer to introduce your company and its product with the aim of arranging an appointment. (This assumes you know their name) You can send a company representative to the company. (This is called cold calling which can work if the person you need to see is actually available at the time of calling. What usually happens is the sales representative is asked to call to make an appointment. The positive result is at least you have got the name of the actual person you need to contact. You still end up having to make a phone call and often, as a result of the call, send a letter with brochures etc.) You can set up a website and pay Google and arrange specialist web based directories to feature your site through paid keyword activated ads. (A good method because at least you know they are actually looking for Trade show selection Trade shows do not happen by accident. They are the result of persons of like minds and commercial interests servicing a specific industry sector (suppliers) and persons of like mind and commercial interest in a specific industry sector (customers) deciding that bringing all of the suppliers together in one place at a specified time would be advantageous to both the suppliers and the customers. Originally trade shows were run by a committee made up of representatives from the supplier and consumer groups. These days these special interest groups often use professional trade show organisers to bring the show together. If you do decide to exhibit at a trade show, be it in NZ or offshore, make sure you check-out the show very carefully before signing the contract. Ask the organiser for an exhibitor list from previous years’ shows and, if possible, to-date bookings for the show you are considering. This will give you the chance to see if your competitors also used the exhibition to promote their company and get a profile of the actual visitors. Most professional exhibition organisers have very sophisticated systems to generate this information. Remember the show visitors are the show organiser’s actual product. By paying to exhibit you are buying access to the show visitors. The stand space you buy is equal to the space you buy in a trade magazine - it allows you access to the magazine’s reader and as with a magazine advertisement, your success will be directly related to how well you present your product and services to the show visitor. Budgeting Some exhibitors spend $6,000.00 on their exhibit and some spend $60,000. The biggest budget I have worked on was $500,000.00. Whatever the spend, the same rule applies when I design the exhibit: “The stand must make a clearly defined proposition to the prime prospect and as a result elicit a question from the visitor which will motivate them to come onto the stand to ask their question”. This is a very important concept. To illustrate the art of budgeting, I will give you an example of a client who had considered their promotional options for getting to their prime prospect and spent $60,000.00 on exhibiting at a trade show even though they actually knew the names of the two, yes, TWO, companies who were likely to buy their product. To put the icing on this little cake my client was known by the two, yes, TWO potential consumers. So that’s two potential consumers at $30,000 a head. When I asked “why go to the show if you already know them and they know you?”, the reply was, �What else can we do, we have one competitor for the business and we know they will be at the show misrepresenting their product and ours?” (or somesuch comment) Imagine my dilemma, a $60,000 budget for my company to spend or I give them other options. “Well” I said feeling a frisson of righteousness, “You could spend the money on taking them to see an actual working installation and give them a chance to talk to an actual user.” Imagine my relief when they said, “We did think about that but the nearest installation is in Germany and due to the extent of our product’s impact on the companies’ methodologies and systems we’d have to take a bus load from each company and that would cost $600,000 even if we could get them all together at one time and assuming the German user would allow a couple of platoons of people from various commercial disciplines descending on their company for a day, handing out greenstone Objets d’Art and jewellery, whilst asking questions of all and sundry.” So they exhibited at the show, both of the potential customers went to the show and one of them bought the multi million dollar system. The exhibit budget was equal to 1% of the actual product cost so in this case exhibiting seemed to have been the right decision. Next article Next issue I will cover budgeting in-depth, stand design and sales- enquiry generation and follow-up. Barry Denton has been in the Exhibition Industry since 1975. He runs training seminars for clients on exhibition-related topics including exhibition stand design and stand-staff training seminars. He is still heavily involved in exhibition stand design, manufacture, installation and removal through �Brandstands’. After the excesses of 1980’s and the forced austerities of the early 1990’s he concentrated on designing, developing and promoting re-usable lightweight portable exhibition collateral to reduce exhibitors’ costs. Should you need to contact him directly he is available on 021 641 812 or 09 415-4090. www.peek.co.nz April / May 2007 19 TRADE SHOWS information about your product type at the time of entering the keyword) You can place a series of advertisements in a specialist publication (Trade Magazine advertising is effective if used consistently; one ad in one issue can be easily missed by the potential customer especially if it is a publication which gets passed on through a company) You can run a series of Show-and-tell Seminars and invite your potential customers. (A great promotional method but it does rely on you knowing the names of the potential customers and being able to devise a way of sending them and invitation you know will get onto their desk) You can exhibit at a trade show Exhibitions offer you the chance to show your company to people who have taken the time out of their busy business lives to come to a show which promises to offer them ways to do what they do, better faster or cheaper. The Exhibition Organiser will have spent real money in a range of media, including websites, direct mail, magazines and billboards to invite potential visitors to the show, thus saving you spending that money. Exhibition stands are three-dimensional advertisements that allow interested parties to at least ask questions about the product and at best actually see your product working. There are other methods including sponsorships and billboard advertising but these methods are usually considered as parts of the marketing mix. DISCUSSION ARTICLE What’s in a name? Anne Scott and Dave Pooch Musing on John Lawson’s article in the February/March issue of Food New Zealand, which reiterated the shortage of qualified, experienced food technologists in the market, Dave Pooch posed a question to an NZIFST Auckland branch committee meeting: “Has the meaning of food technology changed in the wider community?” He was intrigued by the depth of concern expressed by that small group of active food technologists. It’s a big question This article explores the issues raised in that first discussion and raises several further questions. So, what is food technology? “It’s a philosophy,” says Dr Mary Earle, a member of the original team at Massey University which set up the first degree course in 1960. “The term food technology encompasses a broad (and sometimes superficial) knowledge of all facets of food manufacturing; food chemistry and microbiology, plant and process engineering, the regulatory environment, food safety, food marketing; and their application to problem solving. We gave our students a broad base of knowledge and taught them to solve problems – overcome challenges if you want. Many of those teaching them had actively worked in the food industry and so students graduated with knowledge and tools to tackle whatever they faced in their jobs and find a solution. This could be as diverse as discovering which product was the best to put in the market to finding the best way to pump a viscous liquid.” But that was forty years ago, you say. Things have changed. There is now a demand for both food scientists and food tech- 20 Food New Zealand nologists. There are, however, still food manufacturers who want the �original’ style of food technologist, a broadly skilled problem solver. Have there been changes in the courses available? As Dave and I talked with teachers and practitioners of food technology we generated a list of �what has changed’. More tertiary institutions are offering food science and food technology courses Tertiary course structures have changed Secondary schools’ curricula now include technology Students’ career expectations have changed In his article John Lawson said that the market for food technology graduates has become extremely challenging for both employer and employee alike. The industry is desperately short of qualified, experienced food technologists but new graduates are having difficulty finding (their ideal) jobs because time-poor employers lack the resources needed to get new graduates up-tospeed. So is there something wrong with the available courses? Lets take a look at the points above. When Massey opened its doors to food technology undergraduates the only other university teaching a food related course was Otago, which trained many of our teachers and �foodies’ in domestic science matters, via the Home Economics degree, imparting a good understanding of the science of food. Nutrition played a part in their courses. Building on the nutrition and food science of those courses, Otago now offers several options in food science. According to their website “food science builds upon the basic sciences of biology, chemistry and physics and it interacts with such diverse scientific disciplines as human nutrition, microbiology, biochemistry, biotechnology and process engineering. All play an important role in the understanding of the foods we produce, manufacture and consume. Some of the topics addressed by food science include: food manufacturing (product development, processing, packaging); what food is made of (food chemistry and analysis); what has been added (vitamins, preservatives, colour, flavour); how stable it is (shelf life, microbiology); safety (food contaminants, food poisoning); and sensory properties (taste, appearance, smell, texture).” The University of Auckland website has the following description of the areas studied by its food science students. “Food science is the study of all aspects of food. The programme covers the structure and composition of foods, their nutritive values, and the properties that make them so attractive - colour, smell, taste and texture. Recent developments such as functional foods, including nutraceuticals and foods for personalised nutrition, are studied. The preservation of foods and how they are altered during processing is an important part of the degree. Interestingly, a google of �food science NZ’ does not �find’ Massey University. To get their description of course focus and course content you have to enter �food technology’. Massey’s course description is: “The purpose of the food technology major is to produce graduates who are professionals with a wide range of pertinent knowledge and skills. The major comprises a number of themes or strands, which are developed, strengthened and woven into an integrated whole during the four years of the course. These themes are food chemistry, food microbiology and safety, quantitative skills, engineering and processing, marketing and consumer research, business and quality management, and, lastly, integration itself. All themes seek to develop problem solving skills, critical thinking, reasoning, self-management, the ability to work in teams, and effective written and oral communication. Prospective employers place great emphasis on these.” – Massey’s course focus seems little changed over the years. So it is clear that Massey still considers itself to be teaching food technology. Graduates from other food science faculties develop different skill sets. Are employers able to spot the difference? Does it matter? We still see job advertisements looking for food technologists – how may food science trained graduates fill these positions? Have courses changed? Massey University’s Ray Winger asserts that Massey’s philosophy of teaching applied, broad-based, problem-solving food technology hasn’t changed. “We are working hard to retain our applied, practical, industry-focused style of teaching, in the face of increasing pressure from government towards a more academic model. This is a result of Performance Based Research Funding (PBRF), which doesn’t take into account the value of less highly qualified (academically) but industry experienced lecturers teaching practical skills for the benefit of industry. Massey still requires 36 weeks’ work in industry from undergraduates before they complete their degrees.” (The PBRF website, (http:// www.tec.govt.nz/templates/standard.aspx?id=588 ) states that its “primary goal is to ensure that excellent research in the tertiary education sector is encouraged and rewarded. This entails assessing the research performance of tertiary education organisations (TEOs) and then funding them on the basis of their performance.” In practical terms this means that in order to maintain viable funding levels universities are impelled to appoint teaching staff at PhD level who are prolific publishers of research papers. These may not be the best people to teach an undergraduate the difference between pumping hot jam versus milk. The University of Auckland and Otago University pitch their courses at students wanting to study food science. They have left the teaching of (the philosophy of) food technology to Massey. Has the division become blurred? Are employers seeking food technologists and, on hiring a food scientist, discovering a whole different set of skills and potential? If so, how has this happened? April / May 2007 21 DISCUSSION ARTICLE More courses to choose from DISCUSSION ARTICLE Secondary schools’ technology curriculum There is a suspicion, among the many NZIFST members canvassed, that the food technology career option has gained a false reputation as being for less able students. “The brighter school students may be put off studying food technology at university because it is associated with the not-so-academically inclined students at school level,” was a comment recorded in the Auckland Branch committee discussion document prepared by Cathy Merrall of McFoodies. Sue Parkes, a secondary teacher active in the Home Economics Technology Teachers Association(HETTANZ) and the Technology Council (TENZ) explains what happened. “In secondary schools, when the technology learning area was being implemented, many people assumed, incorrectly, that Home Economics (HE) was renamed as food technology. The technology curriculum is much wider than HE which is a separate subject in the technology curriculum,” she says. Is this misunderstanding a factor in the change in perception of food technology as a career? The term food technology came into popular parlance to describe the food part of the technology curriculum, which is taught to all Year 7 and 8 students, and to a proportion of older, secondary students. Do students choosing a career path lack understanding of the term and ignore the discipline as a career option? Further research has highlighted another dimension to this problem, which seems to be a failure of communication. Sue Parkes again. “The reason I believe that students are not going to study food related degrees is that there is little information available (for teachers and pupils) about them. This is one of the roles of Futureintech facilitators. There are many ways we can raise awareness of the degrees. NZIFST and Universities should take advantage of speaking opportunities at, for example Secondary Teacher conferences, have a presence at Genesis Workshops (organised by Rotary). (NZIFST is taking up this suggestion) Be aware that Year 10 students are about to chose the direction of their NCEA studies, it’s those youngsters we need to capture. Year 12 is almost too late and you’ve no chance at Year 13. I believe sponsorships could be gained from companies �desperate for techologists’ to support these sorts of initiatives.” Changing expectations New Zealand is in the grip of a skills-shortage in many industries. This is a complex issue and there is no quick-fix. Even though New Zealand’s $25 billion dollar food industry earns over 50% of the country’s export income, a career in food lacks 22 Food New Zealand the glamour, or perhaps the earning potential, of a law or commerce degree. Perhaps the shortage of �qualified, experienced food technologists’ has occurred because, as an industry, we are failing to communicate our �value-statement’ to the wider community – and their children. Jenny Dee and others are investing a great deal of time in our career programme, looking towards the medium-to-longterm outcome of greater numbers of academically able students wishing to study food science and food technology. The resource base is building and genuine progress is being made but the question remains, is NZIFST doing enough to build awareness in the broader community? Is the Institute mature enough to develop a higher profile with the general public? Is the Institute mature enough to develop a higher profile with the general public? What can we conclude? As an industry we need to put our heads above the parapet; we need to identify our projects, (career development being one of them) and work with professional communicators to develop programmes aimed at raising our Institute’s profile and the awareness of our roles in industry; of the value of food scientists and food technologists to the economy. Our perception that mainstream media seldom runs positive or balanced stories about the food industry or food technologists is probably correct. But this is because they don’t know who to ask to get the �good oil’. It’s time to go public! Remember, that as members of NZIFST we subscribe to the long term objectives of our Institute which are easily accessed on the website; http://www.nzifst.org.nz/about-nzifst/philosophy.asp The first two items in this list are; to develop and promote the profession of food science and technology to promote a technically responsible understanding of foods and food processing through dissemination of knowledge to Institute members, other professionals and the public Judging by the Auckland branch committee reaction to the original question, and additional conversations we have had, many of us have opinions about the issues raised in this article. Please raise your voice and let us know what you think, by email, by phone or put pen to paper! PORK INDUSTRY NEWS Innovation in the Pork Industry: 100% New Zealand Pork – Infused Shankar Cumarasamay, Pork Industry Board The New Zealand Pork Industry Board is pleased to become associated with Food New Zealand. From now on regular articles featuring news and views of the Pork Industry will be published in the journal. Introducing the Board The New Zealand Pork Industry Board (NZPIB) is a body corporate established under the New Zealand Pork Industry Board Act 1997. It operates in the interest of pig farmers, to attain the best possible returns for New Zealand pigs and pork products. Sales of domestically produced pigs generate an estimated $442 million of activity in the processing, distribution, and retail sectors of the New Zealand economy. Furthermore the wider industry makes a significant contribution to the New Zealand economy with total economic activity related to pork exceeding one billion dollars per annum. Apple Tender® Trim Pork The board invests in the development of innovative technologies, both behind and beyond the farm gate. One such development is Apple Tender® Trim Pork, developed in direct response to consumer demand, which followed a text book development scenario of recognising a target group issue, developing a product brief to answer their need, developing a product, testing the developed product with a trained taste panel followed by in-home blind testing, shelf-life trials, regulatory approvals, development of production guidelines, auditing the production process, discussing options with retailers, test marketing in one region, introduction of the product and above-the line advertising after distribution was initiated. Apple Tender® Trim Pork is the only moisture infused product with a Heart Tick (low fat and sodium) currently in the New Zealand market that does not contain nitrites, nitrates or sulphites. The moisture infusion at 11% is lower than any other pork product in this category. New Zealanders’ love affair with roast pork and apple sauce has been innovatively transformed into a product idea giving rise to Apple Tender® Trim Pork. Providing guaranteed tenderness and juiciness, a unique taste (reduced pork flavour with sweet and caramelised notes), nutrition (Heart Foundation Tick Approval), convenience (minimal preparation), versatility and a strong association with New Zealand (manufactured using 100% New Zealand Pork and apple juice concentrate) this product has been developed to deliver multiple attributes targeted to exceed consumer expectations and deliver a satisfying eating experience. Consumer feedback and sales growth is now beginning to accentuate its winning qualities. The development and commercialisation process required contributions from several science groups; namely Massey University, AgResearch and AgriQuality. Using a trained sensory panel and instrumental measurements the infusion was limited to 11% to enable the product to exhibit similar characteristics to non-infused fresh pork at the uncooked stage and provide juiciness and tenderness after cooking without any perceived loss in the integrity of the muscle fibre. The level of apple juice was perfected through extensive experimentation so that the pork flavour was reduced but not lost, a slight sweet note was detected and caramelisation of the product during cooking contributed to a favourable visual appearance but not considered overly excessive. Added sodium was kept to a minimum and where possible ingredients with potassium ions were used without negatively impacting on flavour. Overseas interest in process Development of this technology focused totally on the New Zealand marketplace. The objective was to meet domestic consumer needs whilst also provide differentiation for local product against imports. After the launch of Apple Tender® Trim Pork in the New Zealand market NZPIB received several requests from overseas markets wanting to use this technology. NZPIB have now secured intellectual property rights in selected countries in Asia and Europe and talks related to commercialisation are underway. This product, the transformation of a simple idea to a commercial reality using New Zealand product and skills, is currently undergoing further development to cater for the next generation of consumer needs. Technologies adopted behind the farm gate are expected to feed into this system for further enhancement in the future. April / May 2007 23 ENTREPRENEUR PROFILE Taking care of the business – Mike Rockell, entrepreneur By Anne Scott Have you heard of Xenegy? It’s the product that, initially, supported Mike Rockell’s Aseptic Beverage Systems Limited (ABS), a classic, �in-the-garage’ startup company which is now operating out of factory premises and has caught the eye of an international beverage company. ABS runs a patented low capacity aseptic beverage line filling reclosable single serve packages, which Mike designed and built for small volume beverage operations. The idea that began it all Most recently, Mike has been lecturing at Massey University but he spent a considerable part of his career in the dairy industry – including a period in Singapore for the (then) New Zealand Dairy Board, in �Consumer Milks’ and later with New Zealand Dairy Foods back home. While in these roles it became evident to him that there was a considerable gap in the market in terms of aseptic fillers. Most come from Germany, are very expensive and designed for a very high throughput. Mike’s plan? He decided to build a scaled down aseptic filling plant, suitable for companies wanting to use reclosable single serve packages but that didn’t need the high volume machinery on offer. His production line would reduce the cost of entry into the marketplace for small beverage companies needing aseptic filling, by contract packing for them until such time as they had sufficient capital to invest in the technology themselves. Mike and his business partners did some preliminary planning and he began working on the project, in his spare time, in 2004. Every business owner knows that it takes a significant amount of capital to establish a viable manufacturing business – how much more does it take to design, build and patent your own production line? Make a plan Mike has set out his business plan, as one does, in phases; Phase 1: �Do’ the technology and establish the business – sounds quite simple put like that but it required considerable determination and commitment to achieve phase 1. “ A business based on new technology is very high risk because you are building-in uncertainty by establishing a new process, there is lots of room to make mistakes,” says Mike. Phase 2: Work with the consumer beverage industry in New Zealand providing the technology (via contract packing) and 24 Food New Zealand Mike Rockell building partnerships. This phase took around 2 years, 2005 and 2006. Mike comments, wryly, “This is the stage you have to get through while you wait for the business to make sufficient income for you to work on it full time. You work really hard, worry a lot, and keep believing. What else can you do? Obtaining venture capital is a real issue for business start-ups, the Government is better than it was but this was a really stressful period.” Phase 2 is now complete – Mike is full-time contract-packing and also packing and distributing his own product, Xenegy, a low sugar, flavoured milk drink which sells in school tuck shops. The company was �launched’ last year at the New Zealand Juice and Beverage Awards; winning the NZ Youth Choice Award for Xenegy and at Foodtech Packtech, where significant interest in the process was generated. “We’ve been really busy since then,” says Mike. “At long last we are approaching the point where the business offers more tangible benefits to investors.” ENTREPRENEUR PROFILE Looking to the future Phase 3: Market the technology internationally. Phase 3 is now in sight. Mike sees his technology entering two markets. The high quality, high value, niche product end of the market, both in equipment and contract sales, has potential for good returns. On the other side of the coin is the developing world - countries that have no refrigerated distribution infrastructure. This market has an entirely different cost structure but Mike’s technology would be ideal to help develop local dairy industries. Back to basics Mike Rockell is another of those whose career since graduating B Tech (Biotech) in 1981 has followed the sort of path Dick Earle envisaged for the many students whom he taught - gain experience, find an idea or niche and make it happen. Mike’s first job was with the dairy industry. He was a member of the Dairy Research Institute (now Fonterra Research) team working on whey protein isolates and hydrolysates. (Described by Kevin Marshall in his J C Andrews Award address (Food New Zealand, July 06.)) “This was a time where a great deal of entrepreneurial and creative research was done,” says Mike. “To some extent the technology was driving product development but we had enough people with market experience to balance the projects and derive commercial results. I remember many long discussions about the �technical drive’ and the �market pull-through’. The team was very good at spotting the gap in the market and finding ways to fill it.” Value of experience As a technologist with significant industry experience himself, Mike is very conscious of the value of experience in deciding the direction to take in research and development, arguing that data analysis takes too long at times. He would like to see companies put a greater value on experience, citing situations when 25 year old, highly qualified marketing people ignore the (technologist’s) voice of experience when making decisions on product development projects and want the wheel to be reinvented. “The industry needs more food technologists who have the ability to go from sound science to practical technology and whose real value to their companies is recognised. My online dictionary defines an entrepreneur as one who organises and operates a business, taking on greater than normal financial risks in order to do so. I think Mike Rockell would fervently endorse this definition. While he will encounter further hurdles in achieving his goals, his commitment has seen him reach an end and a beginning – going global! Andrew McKenzie Chief Executive NZ Food Safety Authority As well as its much-publicised Domestic Food Review which will see an overhaul of our decades-old food laws, the New Zealand Food Safety Authority is always looking at specific areas of food safety that need updating, modernising or bringing into line with international �best practice’ One area is the production of uncooked comminuted fermented meats (UCFM) such as salami and we are currently analysing submissions on a New Zealand standard for manufacturing these types of products. The move comes after NZFSA identified a number of instances where butchers and processors were unaware of essential manufacturing procedures that ensure the microbial safety of UCFM foods. These products primarily contain beef and pork meat, salt, nitrite, glucose, spices and seasonings and, ideally, a starter culture to assist fermentation. The ingredients are mixed and comminuted (reduced in size) to produce a batter. This mixture is then stuffed into a casing, fermented and dried (and sometimes smoked) to create the end product. If the fermentation, maturation and drying steps are not undertaken correctly there are risks that potentially harmful microbial pathogens will not be killed by the process. NZFSA recently assessed existing data and information on the way UCFM products are made and whether procedures adequately controlled microbial pathogens, in particular shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC). STEC can be found in raw meat used in UCFM product – although in New Zealand these STEC levels are generally low. Our assessment showed that, in a small number of butcher and processor premises, the control levels may be insufficient. New Zealand has not had any notified human illness cases attributed to eating UCFM products, and the likelihood of a food safety issue occurring is relatively low. However, the consequences of STEC infection – particularly for susceptible groups like young children – can be severe. Overseas foodborne illness outbreaks of STEC have been linked to UCFM products. In 1995 one person died and more than 20 children were hospitalised after eating contaminated product in Australia. The proposed standard will be in keeping with overseas trends in salami manufacturing and will help ensure that New Zealanders are getting a safe product. Although this is the first proposed standard for UCFM production, NZFSA believes many New Zealand producers are already using the existing Australian standard or the New Zealand Pork Quality Improvement Process (PQIP) Code of Practice. The introduction of a standard would not be a problem for these producers but could affect smaller producers who may not have a HACCP (Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Point) system in place. However, working to an agreed New Zealand standard would enable UCFM manufacturers to demonstrate that they produce a safe product. They would need to show that the fermentation, maturation and drying processes reduce the microbial load in the final product to a safe level. The public discussion document and the proposed standard was distributed for comment to UCFM producers, including wholesale processors, retail butchers and dual operator butchers, as well as industry associations and other relevant government agencies. It can still be viewed on our website: www.nzfsa.govt.nz Andrew McKenzie www.nzfsa.govt.nz April / May 2007 25 CONFERENCE ConFectioNZ – 2007 Confectionery Manufacturers’ Conference Image courtesy of Danisco Anne Scott Held at the Millennium Hotel, Rotorua in March, ConFectioNZ promised a wide range of provocative and informative presentations New Zealand’s small group of confectionery manufacturers (17, at last count) use their annual conference as a sort of extended Annual General Meeting. Speakers are chosen for their expertise in areas which the confectionery industry sees as central to their operating environment. Discussion is encouraged and sessions aim to generate consensus when dealing with, in particular, regulatory agencies and media misinformation. Opening the conference, John Tolmie, CEO of Darryl Lea Chocolate Shops, Australia, urged members to continue to innovate and actively market confectionery in a responsible manner. “Confectionery has a rightful place as a permissible treat as part of a balanced diet” he said. “We must avoid commoditising it by continually refreshing the offering to consumers. We must ensure there is a choice of portion sizes, use environmentally friendly packaging and ensure labelling is correct and information easily accessible. Overall we must be seen to be responsible.” He discussed the importance of sustainable manufacturing processes; while confectionery manufacture does not use large amounts of water, there are still opportunities to save water and careful packaging design can improve the sustainability of the industry. David Greenwood, CEO of Confectionery Manufacturers of Australasia discussed the foremost challenges facing manufacturers of confectionery. While it is not (yet) mandatory, he urged members to consider adopting �percentage daily intake’ labelling on products and to participate in the �be treatwise’ scheme. “We must be seen to be actively participating in programmes targeting obesity” he said. Key messages Robert Bree, executive director of the New Zealand Food Industry Group, has extensive experience of the food and beverage industries, having previously held senior commercial roles in Restaurant Brands NZ, Ogilvy and Mather’s Consumer Brands Division, DB Breweries, Griffins Foods Ltd and Coca-Cola NZ Ltd. He reaffirmed the �work together for strength’ principle. FMCG manufacturers must share ideas or put themselves at real risk. “Fragmentation of the industry is excellent for retailers and for pressure groups such as the obesity lobby; divide and rule holds true there,” he said. “Mention the food industry to politicians and they think dairy, meat and seafood: other industry sectors don’t feature on their radar. It is very important that you present a consolidated front when communicating with government. Food manufacturers need a stronger voice. You must make your efforts visible through careful use of the media. You 26 Food New Zealand also need to engage directly with Government, they are one of your target audiences on the road to dispelling the myths.” Robert suggested several �good’ news changes that the confectionery industry could make and talk about; Voluntarily adopt, as a group, percentage RDI labelling Develop an industry code of practice regarding advertising (to children) Standardise portion size packs Have a company �obesity policy’ Develop clear policies on sponsorships His strongest message was do the right thing, as a co-operative group, and make sure people know about it. Partner with your suppliers The final pre-lunch session was given over to suppliers, with Quin Scalzo, from Scalzo Food Industries, and Vikki Paterson, General Manager ANZ of Danisco, taking the stage. They both urged delegates to partner with suppliers in order to achieve genuine innovation. Danisco has significant research and development facilities available to customers for new product development work. Scalzo Food Industries is also able to work closely with customers to develop custom made production lines. They both reminded their audience that suppliers could only supply the answers if they knew the full story. It is not enough to tell a supplier you want a low calorie sweetener for a new product. Quin’s and Vikki’s presentations were followed with a supplier panel discussion, facilitated by David Buisson, which strengthened the message. If you want the good oil, you have to share: think of using suppliers as outsourcing a consultant, they know their products. The message The strongest message for members of the Confectionery Manufacturers’ Association was unite to survive. The segment is a sitting target for the obesity lobby and under threat from retail cost trimming and, to a lesser extent, from the free trade lobby. Robert Bree’s advice to develop a shared policy and (carefully) publicise joint activities is worth considering. As with all sectors of the food industry, the time has come to stand up and be counted and find a way to counter the incomplete data and sheer misinformation that consumers grapple with in their dayto-day food choices. OILS & FATS Oils and Fats News Laurence Eyres Olive Oil Processing Course Olives NZ are running this 3-day course at Suminovich Olives Ltd Estate (Bombay) from April 13th – 15th. The course was oversubscribed and there are no places left. The course is sponsored by Pieralsi of Italy who are providing processing specialists together with local specialists in various fields. International Trade Fair Production and processing of oils and fats from renewable resources. This will be held in Munich November 20-22, 2007. Enjoyable antioxidants Matt Greenwood of Bell Tea gave a most informative and entertaining talk in Auckland entitled “everything you ever wanted to know about tea”, and it was enough to attract over 40 keen people to an evening seminar at Auckland University. Despite coffee’s ever growing popularity, tea (both black and green) is enjoying a renaissance. More and more health and wellness papers are being published on the benefits of tea consumption. An ever increasing majority of soft retail table spreads in Australasia are now trans-free. If trans-fats are eliminated from yellow-fat spreads, then the normal standard procedure is to replace them with interesterified mixtures of palm stearine and a hydrogenated lauric oil such as coconut or palm–kernel oil. This author’s attention was recently drawn by a number of our readers, to a recent article by Sundram et al, showing that stearic-acid-rich interesterified fats raise the LDL/HDL cholesterol ratio and also elevate plasma glucose levels relative to palm olein (45% saturated) as a control. Fortunately most “hardstocks” in Australasia are not stearic-acid-rich but are mixtures of predominantly C16:0, C12:0 and lower molecular weight saturated fatty acids. However to this author’s knowledge no full clinical trials have been carried out on zero trans spreads containing these fatty acids. Also for clarification, the current controversy over banning trans-fats is concerning products industrially produced by chemical hydrogenation – not natural trans fats produced by ruminants in meat or dairy fats. Typical Spreads in Australasia Old Style Margarine New Trans-free A well known figure in lipid nutrition and a past speaker at several major New Zealand based conferences, David Kritchevsky has died aged 86. He was a co-author on the first book on cholesterol in 1958 and on beta-sitosterol in 1981. Jean-Pierre Dufour Interesterified fat spreads Product David Kritchevsky Saturates % Trans % S&T Total % 19 8-11 27-30 27.5 0 (<1.0) 27-28 N.B. A recent publication “Trans-Fat Reduction” is currently selling for 30,000 euros – published by LMC International Ltd. Oils & Fats Book The group has encountered some minor delays in finalising the content (due to authors’ contributions) for the previously announced book on edible oils in Australasia. We now anticipate launch sometime in late July/August at a retail price under $100. Closer to home we were all saddened by the recent sudden death of Jean-Pierre. He was a good friend personally and was a supporter of the group with some excellent lipid work originating from Otago over the years. Our deepest sympathies go to the family and the department who are devastated by his passing. Olibra and Fabuless Royal DSM N.V. have announced that they have purchased the company Lipid Technologies Provider AB (LTP) a Swedish company with a technology platform based on formulated lipids from palm and oat specialty lipids. The original product was called “Olibra” but is now called “Fabuless”. It is reported to be a revolutionary weight management system utilising novel lipid ingredients to help in providing satiety. A retail product “Slim-Shots” being a 7.5 ml. serving of an emulsion containing the special lipids was launched on the NZ market on March 21st by Gelven Ltd. See European Journal of Clinical Nutrition (2002) 56, 368377 by M.B.E Livingstone et al. Errata: Rice Bran Oil Spread We made a couple of unfortunate errors in the last edition. Firstly the product is in a single pack in an attractive sleeve and is made in New Zealand although the back label has a prominent box saying the oil is produced in Thailand. The product is a pleasant soft spread with excellent salt release and low melting texture. It has a fatty acid composition of 23% saturates, zero trans, 32% monounsaturated and 25% polyunsaturated. For interesting background reading on rice bran oil see “How good is the evidence for effects of rice bran oil on blood lipid concentrations in humans?” Lipid Technology 2002,(14) 109-111 April / May 2007 27 TRAVELLER’S TALE The feel-good fill up Neil Betteridge The 2006 Earle Travel Fellowship was awarded to Neil Betteridge, a bioprocess engineer at Fonterra I used my Fellowship in Technology to attend the 2006 International Fuel Ethanol Workshop and Expo in Milwaukee, U.S.A. I intended to explore innovation associated with both ethanol and caseinate production by attending the Workshop and visiting a milk protein manufacturing plant in the U.S.A. The main goal of this trip was to gain exposure to innovations and knowledge that can be applied in my role as the Protein and Ethanol Plant Manager at the Fonterra Reporoa site in New Zealand. The efficient production of bio-fuels within New Zealand is of growing importance in both the engineering and food technology fields for the long-term security of New Zealand’s economic growth. Ethanol workshop and seminar Over 3,500 attended the conference and the sheer enthusiasm for fuel ethanol of those attendees, presenters and exhibitors from around the world was inspiring. The biggest gain I have brought back to New Zealand from the conference is increased determination to see fuel ethanol opportunities realised in New Zealand. The conference clearly showed that fuel ethanol is working well for the country, citizens, producers and the vehicle fleet in the United States. The �Ethanol 101’ seminar was very interesting and well presented. The first interesting fact was that the �Ethanol Plant Development Book’, which accompanied the seminar did not include whey as a possible feedstock for ethanol manufacture. This was reiterated throughout the four days of the fuel ethanol Workshop (FEW). Only a few people I talked to had heard of ethanol being manufactured from dairy whey. It must be noted that attendees ranged from experienced plant managers and equipment suppliers or crop growers looking at amalgamating to form a new co-op, through to airline pilots and other investors who knew nothing about the subject but had funds ready to invest into fuel ethanol. The entire workshop painted a picture of a large, vibrant fuel ethanol market in North America; a growing global market supported by a growing production industry. As of May 2006 there were 100 ethanol plants operating in the U.S with a combined production capacity of 4.5 billion gallons. In addition, 34 more ethanol plants and nine expansions were under construction and will contribute another two billion gallons of production capacity once completed. The specific presentations of fermentation technologies, advancements in feedstocks and optimisation of energy and yield were all well presented and interesting. I was impressed with the degree of process control and optimisation that these plants are being constructed with. They are very focused on maximising output and followed a common theme of not settling for second best technology. 28 Food New Zealand Motors & Brake Motors \ Servo Motors \ Gear Units \ Geared Motors Drive Electronics \ Industrial Gear Units Ethanol is BIG in the USA Ethanol expo The expo of exhibitors was open for viewing throughout the last three days of the workshop. Exhibitors covered a hall the size of four rugby fields. Several companies that we use in New Zealand were present, such as key equipment suppliers and process control companies. I gained knowledge regarding the plant building standards within the U.S. I will be able to utilise some of that information as we go through the process of certifying our facility to be compliant for the new hazardous substances act. TorqLOC Mounting System for hollow shaft gear units Components of the TorqLOC® shaft mounting system 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Customer shaft Clamping ring Conical bronze bushing Gear unit hollow shaft Shrink disc Conical steel bushing Fixed cover Moving ahead with biofuels As a result of attending the workshop I have presented a business case to the General Manager of Anchor Ethanol with some options and opportunities for Anchor Ethanol to both lift its profile in fuel ethanol and to accelerate the introduction of fuel ethanol at the pump in New Zealand. New Zealand consumes 6.3 billion litres of petrol and diesel per annum at a cost of $4.5 billion; (3.4 billion L petrol, 2.9 billion L diesel). Many countries around the world are offering fuel ethanol blends at the pump ranging from 2.5% ethanol mixtures up to 85%. Fonterra is aware it cannot play a large role in filling the fuel ethanol requirement for NZ due to the sheer volume of ethanol needed. However, there is no reason we cannot work with the NZ government and fuel companies to kick-start the supply and education of the benefits of fuel ethanol to consumers. In 2006 the NZ government announced that by 2008 it would like 0.25% of fuels to be ethanol or biofuel based which equates to 16 million litres per annum. By 2012 it would like to see that raised to 2.25% or 115 million litres per annum. Additionally, it stated that no excise tax would be paid on biofuels until 2012. In February 2007, the government lifted these targets to a more aggressive 0.53% in 2008 and 3.4% by 2012. This has created a large public media debate as to whether New Zealand is making a �giant mistake’ by embracing biofuels or a great decision for future generations of New Zealanders. For biofuels to be a successful fuel option for New Zealanders, consumer confidence will need to be raised through research and education. One of the exhibits I enjoyed most was that of the Ethanol Promotion and Information Council (EPIC). They are a �non profit alliance of ethanol industry leaders that have come together to grow consumer demand for ethanol as a viable source of renewable energy through targeted marketing and non political means’. EPIC was formed in 2005. I was impressed with their efforts to educate their consumers and the results they are achieving. I believe this is a key area where New Zealand can improve. One of their main slogans is �fill up, feel good’; very simple but effective marketing, building on the education of their consumers. U.S.A is a very patriotic country and EPIC has played on that to a great extent. Another slogan 1 2 3 7 4 5 6 The patented TorqLOC was introduced in late 2002. Due to its anti-corrosive properties and hollow shaft design, it is highly recommended for use in wet applications. TorqLOC requires no key and should remain corrosion free, even after years of service. It contacts the customer’s solid shaft in only two places at the support bushing which is bronze and will not corrode to steel due to the nature of dissimilar metals and at the torque bushing which is electro less nickel plated 1045 carbon steel. Furthermore, the high clamping forces located at the torque bushing prohibit the presence of oxygen so oxidation (rust) cannot occur. SEW-EURODRIVE’s TorqLOC shaft locking system is used for mounting Helical (F series), Helical-bevel (K series), and Helicalworm (S series) hollow shaft geared motors and geared units. It is designed to allow mounting onto standard bright steel shafting without the necessity of machining or cutting keyways. TorqLOC provides an easy method of assembly to or disassembly from the machines solid shaft. Advice, planning & drive calculations. Fast service customised units from our huge range of in-stock components, 24 hour support SEW-EURODRIVE (NZ) LTD TL407 www.sew-eurodrive.co.nz AUCKLAND 82 Greenmount Drive, East Tamaki PO Box 58 428, Greenmount Ph: 09-274 5627 Fax: 09-274 0165 PALMERSTON NORTH Phone: 06- 355 2165 CHRISTCHURCH 10 Settlers Crescent, Ferrymead PO Box 19 825, Woolston Ph: 03-384 6251 Fax: 03-384 6455 April / May 2007 29 TRAVELLER’S TALE they utilise is �Good for your car, good for your country, better for the environment’. Ethanol production creates thousands of jobs across the United States and reduces dependence on foreign oil. Perhaps New Zealanders are not as easily swayed to change, but we can improve the quantity and quality of the information we portray to our consumers so they can make their own informed decisions. Diary Partners of America In addition to attending the fuel ethanol workshop, I had the opportunity to visit the biggest direct customer of the protein products we manufacture at the Reporoa Site. That is the Dairy Partners of America site in Allerton, north of Kansas City. Fonterra also extended the trip by three days to enable me to visit the Fonterra USA sales office in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania. Not all work Aside from the three weeks of engineering learning, during four jam packed weekends I was able to appreciate and explore the Statue of Liberty, Ground Zero, Empire State building and the United Nations in New York, the awesome Art Museum and Millers brewery in Milwaukee, the Sears Tower and the �L’ in Chicago along with visiting an Amish village; James Town, north of Kansas City. Benefits of the Fellowship I believe I have achieved all of my objectives and those of the Trust. I have viewed this fellowship to be more than just the three weeks I was out of the country, and will continue to progress the fuel ethanol options within New Zealand and build on my milk protein industry leanings. The fellowship also gives a young engineer or technologist the chance to experience life outside New Zealand. I would like to thank the Richard and Mary Earle Technology Trust for this great opportunity. I am looking forward to making a difference in both the fuel ethanol and milk protein businesses within New Zealand. This trip benefited me professionally, along with my employer and potentially the automotive industry in New Zealand. I thoroughly recommend that NZIFST or IPENZ members eligible for this Fellowship put their passions on paper and fill out an application form. Make it happen, get your application forms in. Earle Travel Fellowship in Technology The Earle Travel Fellowship in Technology is for the support and encouragement of young professional food technologists and bioprocess engineers to attend overseas conferences, workshops or short courses; or to work alongside a specialist in a research centre, a company or a specialist-training establishment. They gain practical experience in: Product development and innovation management Process development in food processing or bioprocessing Neil Betteridge, a bioprocess engineer, was awarded the first Fellowship, his report is on these pages. Neil is a member of both NZIFST and IPENZ. Applications for the 2007 Fellowship now open Members of NZIFST and IPENZ are now encouraged to apply for the 2007 Fellowship. Mary Earle hopes to see many product developers applying, so that they can travel overseas to see the latest in food product innovation. New Zealand’s large and small food companies have to innovate if they are to be successful in food exporting. Dick Earle was encouraged by last years applicants who were involved in bioprocessing and asks bioprocess and food engineers to apply this year. Applicants need to be New Zealand citizens or permanent residents who have resided in New Zealand for at least three years proceeding the year of selection. They will be members of NZIFST or IPENZ, and aged under 40 years but with a preference to candidates under 35 years. They will be employed in the NZ technological industries (products or services), or an associated research organisation. The trip will be up to 3 months, after which the Fellow must work in New Zealand for at least 1 year. Payments will be for travel, accommodation costs and fees, but not for stipends or salaries. The target maximum value for the Fellowship is $10,000 but it may be increased under special circumstances to $15,000. Application forms and conditions for the Fellowship are available from either the NZIFST web site (www.nzifst. org.nz) or by contacting Rosemary Hancock, NZIFST Executive Manager, e-mail [email protected], phone 06 356 1686 Applications close on 10th May 2007, final selection will be by 1st June. Very cool architecture and engineering design at the Milwaukee Art Museum 30 Food New Zealand NZIFST Council News Sudden death of NZIFST past President New Zealand’s academic community and the brewing industry have lost a respected scientist and world-class brewing consultant with the death of Belgium-born Professor Jean Pierre Dufour on February 26th, while attending an Institute of Brewing and Distillery conference in Nigeria. Professor Dufour (54), known to most people as “JP”, was chairman of the Otago/Southland Branch for 5 years before becoming Vice-President of the NZIFST in 2001 and President from 2003-2005. His term as President saw completion of the amalgamation of NZIFST and DIANZ after a prolonged membership consultation period. Many of us within the NZIFST Jean-Pierre Dufour have fond memories of JP: he was a good will be much friend, colleague and mentor to many. missed JP was a colourful and well-liked character – popular with his students for his contagious enthusiasm for research and his quirky sense of humour. The NZ food industry will sorely miss his style, vision, and depth of knowledge over a wide variety of subjects. Professor Dufour had successfully led Food Sciences at the University of Otago since his arrival 12 years ago. He initially trained as a chemical engineer before spending six years as the head of Belgium’s University of Louvain brewing school. From 1989 to 1995, Professor Dufour was Invited Professor at Portugal’s Universidade Catolica Portuguesa, Escola Superior de Biotecnologia. The following two years were spent as Associate Professor at Senghor University, Egypt. He was an internationally respected consultant to both private enterprise and international organisations, working on European Union and United Nations programmes during the period 1989 to 1996. His expertise could be best described as the science of flavour. He was a world leader in applying the latest analytical techniques to flavour analysis, he loved working in the laboratory – sniffing and analysing the flavours first-hand. He had published more than 70 scientific papers and presented at numerous national and international conferences. His passion for good beer was well known and has seen him judge at the New Zealand Beer Awards (an engagement he was scheduled to repeat this year) and work closely with local micro-breweries, particularly Emersons in Dunedin. Last year, he received the BrewNZ Lifetime Achievement Award for his contributions to brewing in New Zealand. New teacher fellows NZIFST welcomes Helen McCallum, from Waimea Intermediate in Nelson, Joanne Hutt, from Shirley Boys’ High School in Christchurch and Angela McKee, from Napier as the 2007 NZ Science Mathematics and Technology Teacher Fellows Helen McCallum has taught at both primary and secondary level for over 20 years. During this time she has seen many curriculum changes, from girls-only cooking classes to co-ed Home Economics, through to the present technology curriculum. The changes have meant a move from lessons with a predominantly practical style to a technology base. Helen applied for her fellowship to enable her to enhance her own knowledge and understanding of food product development, and to see first hand how this actually happens in the food industry. Her proposed study is �5+ A Day the Technology Way’. She will be involved with the development of a new food product through working with �fresh-a-peel’ (a local company) and her professional mentor, Dr Grant MacDonald, from the Nelson Marlborough Institute of Technology. A month into her fellowship, Helen said: “I can’t believe the learning opportunities I have had. So far I have been involved in trial testing a fruit product for the market; carrying out shelf life testing, observing microbiological testing, also determining the yields on raw to processed fruit and then working on the Helen McCullum �up to her elbows’ in fruit recipe mix and percentage of fruits used in the different mixes. Other areas of my research have included finding out about year-round availability of the fruit, finding suitable packaging and working on all aspects of the costing. Next week I am going to visit a dried apricot operation in Central Otago and Barker Fruit Processors in Geraldine. This will further my understanding of the development and processing of fruit and vegetable products.” Joanne Hutt, from Shirley Boys’ High School, in Christchurch, is studying �Cheese making: Age-old biotechnology in modern times’, and Angela McKee from Napier, is studying �Technological practice: The food basket of Hawke’s Bay (Te Rourouo Heretaunga)’. April / May 2007 31 NZIFST NZIFST Council co-opts two new members Jenny Dee and Miang Lim have been co-opted onto the NZIFST Council to represent the careers programme. They have sent us profiles and outlines of their aspirations for the programme Jenny Dee I have been working in the food processing industry for 26 years. My interest in working with teachers started in 2003, when I met food technology teacher (and RSNZ Teacher Fellow) Carolyn Norquay on the study tour to Queensland. She was fascinated by what she saw “inside the food industry”. When she returned to teaching, Jenny Dee she asked her local NZIFST branch for support, and food technologists have been working with her ever since. Carolyn is now a Beacon Practice food technology teacher – leading the way for other food technology teachers. In September 2005, the Hawke’s Bay branch of the Institute started working with Beacon Practice teachers, Carol Rimmer and Kate McLennan, at Havelock North High School. This led to four young food technologists from Heinz Wattie’s being trained as Futureintech Ambassadors, and the ball was rolling: I was hooked. In February 2006 the Careers Committee was officially formed. With Phil Bremer. Sue Parkes and Abby Thompson on the team, and the support of Futureintech and the Royal Society of New Zealand, we have achieved a great deal. NZIFST and the food industry have a much higher profile with schools and teachers than a year ago. We will build on that profile this year, with the initiatives mentioned in the careers update elsewhere in this journal. The committee alone could not possibly do all of this; it’s great to have the support of members of the Institute who have offered to help with specific initiatives. It’s going to be another big year for careers, and there are lots of opportunities for members to get involved. Dr Miang Lim Dr Miang Lim grew up in Malaysia, completed her BSc in Canada and obtained her MS and PhD degrees from the University of California, Davis. She then worked for seven years at the headquarters of two US multinational companies, as a technical application scientist at M&M/Mars and a product development project leader at Warner Miang Lim Lambert (now Pfizer). Miang started her academic life at the University of Otago in 1996, developing the industrial project based food product development programme and establishing the Food Science Club. She was the treasurer and executive committee member of the Otago/Southland Branch NZIFST from 1998-2005 and the student liaison officer for Otago/Southland Branch (2005). 32 Food New Zealand As a co-opted member to the NZIFST Executive Committee, with special responsibility for our students, Miang’s goals as a Student Liaison Officer are: Encouraging more student participation in NZIFST conferences, through industry travel grants, increasing the number or value of presentation competition prizes and student social activities. Encouraging establishment of Food Science Clubs in each food science department and involving these students with the local branch activities Being a direct contact for the student representatives from each department so that the Institute can work to serve them better Encouraging continuing student contact with the Institute after graduation Notice of AGM The 42nd Annual General Meeting of the New Zealand Institute of Food Science & Technology Inc will be held Tuesday, 19 June 2006, in the Town Hall, Wellington, from 4.45pm – 5.30pm. All current financial members are invited to attend. The Agenda will be mailed in May to each member’s last known postal address. Calls for Nominations for Exective officers Nominations are invited for the following NZIFST officers for 2007-2008, to take office following the AGM in June 2007: President Vice-President Honorary Treasurer All nominations are to be signed by a proposer and a seconder and countersigned by the nominee. Closing date for nominations is Wednesday 18 April 2007. Forward nominations to: Executive Manager, NZIFST P O Box 8031, Palmerston North Fax 06 356 1687 Nominations for Fellow of the NZIFST Nominations are invited for the promotion of NZIFST Professional Members to the level of Fellow. Nominations may be made by any group of three Fellows or Professional members of the Institute and must be accompanied by a written statement outlining the career of the nominee and a supporting statement signed by the nominators For details on qualifying conditions please telephone 06 356 1686 or email [email protected]. Closing date for nominations is Wednesday 18 April 2007. Forward nominations to: Executive Manager, NZIFST, P O Box 8031, Palmerston North Fax 06 356 1687 NZIFST Branch News Food Industry Golf Day Kim Buckley The re-emergence of the Food Industry Golf Day after 20 years was a great success and many thanks to all players, sponsors and volunteers who supported the day – held at Manakau Golf Club on Tuesday 6th March 2007. Invited along for the day were two original golfers from the first ever Food Industry Golf Days held in the late 1960’s – Harry Lewin and Mike Thompson. Mike kept us entertained with stories about those days of a rowdy group of eight (Harry, Mike, Leith Thompson, Bert McCartney, Peter Jarvis, Wolf Neill, Lance Carrick and Jock Tunicliffe) playing golf on their way to conference. Mike is the son of Leith who donated the original handcrafted wooden rosebowl trophy (unfortunately now lost but replaced in the 1980’s). Mike presented this year’s trophy in memory of his father, a long-standing NZIFST member at Tip Top Ice Cream. The competition was an Ambrose Teams event - we had 14 teams entered and with some encouragement they decked themselves out in colourful uniforms. Amid much hilarity, the golf was surprisingly competitive with not much in the scores at the The Bronson & Jacobs Sandblasters seem to have missed LawsonWill.pdf 22/3/07 10:15:53 AM their cue? end. Congratulations to the winning team - Stonemill from GS Hall & Co. – Stephen Findlay, Charles Hall, Scott Robertson, KC Ng. Runners-up, Carlsberg Cowboys, looking very dangerous in their red shirts, gave it their best shot both on the golf course and around the drinks cart sampling their own product (and chatting up the girls from Swift) but were just pipped by a few putts. Note from Auckland Branch We wish to specially recognise our sponsors on the day who supported generously and contributed to a very impressive prize table. Sponsors included BASF, Bronson & Jacobs, Inghams, GS Hall, Horleys, Cleantec, Kerry Ingredients, APS Food & Nutrition, Barkers Fruit Processors, Hawkins Watts, Heat & Control, Frucor, Independent Liquor (Carlsberg), Sensient Technologies, Food Tech Solutions, Peppermint Press (Food NZ Magazine), Swift. Kim Buckley showed her experience by organising a smooth running day’s entertainment, thanks Kim. For some, the game was incidental, but all had a great time. The full list of winners will be posted on the website, www.nzifst.org.nz along with photographs. Brian Stanbury, Harry Lewin, Mike Thompson and Gerard Hall – “The Golden Oldies” The winners, Team Stonemill, KC Ng, Stephen Findlay, Charles Hall and Scott Robertson, with Mike Thompson, who presented the prizes April / May 2007 33 Gerry Townsend from Heinz Wattie’s presents the 2007 University of Otago Heinz Wattie’s Food Science Scholarship to first year food science student, Lauren Edmonds Associate Professor Phil Bremer presents the 2007 NZIFST Prize to 3rd year food science student, Estee Mathias With great anticipation and excitement, staff and students from the Department of Food Science at the University of Otago met on the evening of Friday March 16 to find out the winners of several prestigious student awards. This event was co-hosted by the NZIFST Otago/Southland branch and the Food Science Club of the University of Otago. Heinz Wattie’s product development manager, Gerry Townsend, made the long trip south from Hawkes Bay to meet with the students from Otago and to present a talk on product development. Heinz Wattie’s has been very generous in supporting students at Otago by the funding of the University of Otago Heinz Wattie’s Food Science Scholarship. With barely concealed excitement, acting head of food science, associate professor Phil Bremer, read out the names of the successful students. The winners of the Heinz Wattie’s scholarship in each year (and the year that their scholarship started) were: Lauren Edmonds, 1st year student (2007), Roimata Strickland, 2nd year student (2006), Jane Oliver, 3rd year student (2005), and Selina Lai, 4th year student (2004). This year’s winner, Lauren Edmonds, hails from Lower Hutt, and will receive a scholarship worth $2500 over two years. She will also have the opportunity to work at Heinz Wattie’s over the summer after completing her second year in food science at the University of Otago. The food science winners of the Bee Nilson Scholarship in 2007 were Selina Lai, Tasha McCarthy and Gemma Hayward. These 4th year honours students were awarded stipends of $6000 each based on their scholastic achievements, and are currently enrolled in the honours programme in food science at Otago. Selina is working on a project to utilise anti-microbial agents and anti-oxidants to extend the shelf-life of pesto. Tasha is working on producing a spread from olive oil. Gemma’s project is examining plant-based alternatives to calf rennet for the coagulation of milk to manufacture cheese. The Bee Nilson award is named after Otago graduate, Amanda Rhoda (Bee) Nilson, who made an outstanding contribution to the field of food science and human nutrition. The winner of the NZIFST prize was Estee Mathias. This award recognises the highest achiever in second year in food science, and comes with a prize of $500 and a one-year student membership of NZIFST. The University Bookshop Prize in Sensory Science winner was Fiona Hedley, Sara Tyrell won the Brenda Bell Memorial Prize in consumer and food science, and the J. Cowie Nichols Prize in Food Science was given to Zijia Chang. Congratulations to all of these students! The food industry in New Zealand is crying out for skilled food scientists and practitioners. With the dedication and interest shown by these students, the industry in New Zealand can rest assured that it will be passed on to capable hands in the future. NZIFST Directory NZIFST Otago ADMINISTRATION DIVISION CONTACTS EXECUTIVE MANAGER Rosemary Hancock PO Box 8031, Palmerston North Ph (06) 356 1686 Fax (06) 356 1687 Mob (021) 217 8298 [email protected] DAIRY INDUSTRY Toni Hunt [email protected] FOOD SAFETY Campbell Mitchell [email protected] FOOD MARKETING Tony Garrett [email protected] NUTRITION Dave Monro [email protected] SENSORY Rebecca Shingleton [email protected] NATIONAL EXECUTIVE PRESIDENT VICE PRESIDENT TREASURER 34 David Everett, University of Otago Food New Zealand Sally Hasell Ph (04) 475 7989 [email protected] David Munro Ph (07) 575 7940 [email protected] Carol Cullen Ph (07) 304 9707 [email protected] NOT A MEMBER OF NZIFST THE NEW ZEALAND INSTITUTE OF FOOD SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY? JOIN NOW! APPLICATION FORM AVAILABLE AT WWW.NZIFST.ORG.NZ Auckland What better way to start the year than to sit in the garden of Tauranga’s best restaurant on a beautiful summer afternoon tasting cheese and enjoying a glass of wine? Bay of Plenty Branch and Dairy Division were fortunate to be offered the opportunity to run a seminar by Juliet Harbutt, New Zealand’s only Master of Cheese and international cheese expert. The seminar was entitled �Developing High Quality, High Value New Zealand Cheese’. As we worked our way through 11 cheeses (6 of which were from New Zealand), Juliet gave us a potted history of cheesemaking, a simple and effective cheese classification system, a summary of factors that affect cheese flavour and quality, a layman’s guide to the cheesemaking process, a quiz on cheese fat content, and an idea of what to look for in good cheese. Most of the New Zealand cheeses we tasted compared well with the imports (two of them topped the tasting), but the range of cheeses tasted gave us some idea of the variety and complexity of flavours and textures that are possible. Juliet was critical of our cheesemakers generally for using too much salt and cream and quite complimentary about many of our small cheesmakers, our Dutch cheesemakers, and the classic �blue vein’ New Zealand cheese – made since 1951. I asked Juliet if there was a particular style of cheese New Zealand should focus on to develop high quality and value. She said no, but focus on factors that affect the complexity of cheese flavour, such as region, pasture (not just rye and clover) and breed of cow (or sheep or goat). Bay of Plenty Branch would like to thank Juliet for a wonderfully refreshing learning experience, and Rick and Anne of Somerset Cottage for giving us both the opportunity and a superb environment. David Munro For our first meeting of 2007, we invited Professor Laurence Melton to present his inaugural Professorial lecture, entitled, in Laurie’s usual quirky style, �Gastrophiles and Crapulence’. As an introduction Laurie talked about the impact of the orientation of β-D-glucose & α-D-glucose on the properties of starch and cellulose. Cellulose consists of microfibrils that are aligned in differently configured arrays. Tamarillo was the source of the smallest diameter cellulose microfibril measured. His talk moved into research on plant cell walls (approximately 65% water with dietary fibres composed of cellulose 30%, hemicellulose 25%, pectin 40% and protein 5%). We learnt that mealy and fresh, juicy fruit have similar water content but differ in cell pressure, with the cells in juicy fruit bursting open. Key messages: Even with advances in science in recent decades, there is still much to be learned about the structure of compounds Ongoing pure research is essential to our understanding of food and underpins advances and developments in applied science The devil is in the detail; critically assess scientific publications –plant cell wall is very structured in fresh plant in comparison with prepared material. As the debate rages about healthy diets and obesity, simple sugars versus dietary fibres, it is timely to recall a quotation from Paracelsus - “the poison is in the dose”. If laughter is the best medicine, the 35 members present received a healthy dose in what was a stimulating, entertaining and thought provoking presentation to kick off 2007. Our congratulations go to Hamish Conway, Goodman Fielder, who was presented with his Professional member certificate. Marion Cumming Ceres Organics NZ’S AUTHORITY ON FOOD TECHNOLOGY, RESEARCH AND MANUFACTURING Bulk organic ingredients We specialise in certified organic bulk ingredients: Grains Seeds Beans Nuts Spices Oils Dried fruit Canned fruit Vegetables Flours Gluten free flours Sweeteners Condiments And more… Contact: Sonu Kumar DDI - 09 920 2500 Mob - 021 400331 SUBSCRIPTION FORM OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF NZIFST • ENDORSED BY MIA APRIL/MAY 2007 Name Address Phone Email Please invoice me for $ (see below for rates) and add me to your subscribers’ list. Note that your subscription will be activated on receipt of payment SUBSCRIPTION RATES: New Zealand: $NZ70.00 incl GST Australia: $NZ125.00 Rest of the world: Price on application – email [email protected] indicating your country Return completed subscripton form to: Peppermint Press, P O Box 11 530, Ellerslie, Auckland, New Zealand or go to www.peppermintpress.co.nz and subscribe on line. April / May 2007 35 NZIFST Bay of Plenty – Cheese seminar NZIFST Countdown to conference Charles Brennan and Miang Lim Food – the challenges June 19th – 21st Wellington Town Hall With only 3 months left before the conference opening, the programme has now been finalised and is a fascinating mixture of both applied and theoretical science. Programme committee members have been inundated with offers of oral and poster presentations and offers of help, showing the food industry has a vibrant heart and soul. With over 100 oral presentations and offers for poster presentations still coming in from students and academics, the programme is literally jam-packed this year. Benefits Perhaps one of the most important parts of any conference is the opportunity to socialise, to build on our existing networks and develop new ones. A conference is also a crucial part of developing future food technologists and we are lucky in having a large number of students presenting at the conference (and competing for the student oral and poster prizes). Trade display underpins conference In support of the formal sessions, there is the renowned trade display which will highlight recent advancements in processes, ingredients and quality-prediction equipment for the food industry. This is a vital part of the vibrant conference life, helping all of us to network with our colleagues. The core of a conference So what is on offer and why should you attend ? Well…the scene is set for us in the first session of the conference on 19th June with a sparkling cast of Keynote speakers. Andrew Ferrier (CEO of Fonterra) will highlight the role of the food industry to New Zealand’s economy, a theme which will be enlarged on by Tim Gibson (New Zealand Trade and Enterprise) who will explore the crucial role of export markets in the growth of our industry. Well known journalist, analyst and Professor of Innovation, Rod Oram, will then continue the link, analysing the needs of the industry in terms of future growth. Finally The New Zealand Food Safety Authority will highlight the importance of food safety in consumer confidence in the industry. 36 Food New Zealand Key speakers from the concurrent sessions include Lisa Oakley discussing pasteurisation technology within the dairy system; Mike Needham leading us through the trends and choices of packaging in order to optimise product quality; Bronwen Smith on using the microscope to illustrate finer points of food structure, and Jean Margerison discussing manipulation of animal feeds to develop novel milk bioactive compounds. Two workshops are also planned for the first day. The morning session, led by Chris Downs, describes how to get the best out of government assistance in fine tuning your research and development and product formulation work. The afternoon workshop (led by Gerrit Meerdink) explores how culinary and sensory skills can be effectively employed to deliver exciting new products for the consumer. Looking ahead, functional foods Day two starts bright and early with Geoff Savage and Julian Mellentin looking at recent global trends and developments in functional foods in the morning plenary session. In the same session Marina Carcea and Tom Huppertz will explore the end points of functional food development and novel processing techniques which may be used to enhance food products. Later in the morning food safety becomes a strong theme with a session given over to the hot topic of traceability within the food industry and the practicalities of recalls. The workshop on the practicalities of measuring food quality is another must go-to session. The afternoon plenary sessions start with Peter Stevens, of GS1, looking at traceability in the food system and how to effectively manage this in a real life situation. This is followed by discussions on the utilisation of antibody assays in the food industry by Chris Smith of IFST, and the utilisation of real time assays for food product quality measurements by leading researcher and entrepreneur Barry McCleary. Food safety theme continues Food safety is carried on into the concurrent sessions with a session devoted to the very topical area of campylobacter in the food industry. Other afternoon concurrent sessions will explore the plethora of novel food ingredients that are available to the food industry in terms of adding nutraceutical benefits to products, and a session identifying trends and product development within the snack food sector. The need to understand the consumer is the topic of the morning plenary sessions of the last day of the conference with keynote speakers exploring the differences in culture and tastes in Japan with Makoto Kinjo, President of ANZCO Foods Japan Ltd, followed by a talk detailing the possibility of exporting bioactive compounds and functional foods to the Asian market by Young Mee Yoon of Comvita New Zealand Limited. The final keynote speech is given over to Professor Pingfan Roa who will explore the potential of China as a rapidly expanding export market for NZ food industry. Concurrent sessions in the morning bring together advances in food chemistry, hosted by Laurie Melton. Topics include novel approaches to processing and product optimisation in the seafood and fish industry links between crop physiology and product quality in the fruit and vegetable sector. The final workshop of the conference will explore the pitfalls of developing your own company. Development resourcing a paper on how universities and academics can aid product innovation in the food industry by Richard Archer of Massey University; then how industry can translate blue sky advancements of research from Universities and CRI’s by Geoff Tempest, and a final look at how the government can assist this link by Paul Bruere of MoRST. MoRST Roadmap After the closing ceremony there is an extra workshop run by MoRST that will explore the RoadMap for developing and growing the food industry through research and innovation. This session will be a mix of communication of ideas as well as discussion on which areas attention needs to be given in order to lead to the ongoing success of the New Zealand Food industry. Don’t miss this event I look forward to seeing you all in Wellington in a few weeks time. I believe that this year’s conference will be one of those we will remember for many years to come. The final plenary session marks the end of the conference with Keynote speakers sampler Rod Oram Rod Oram has 30 years’ experience as an international journalist. He is currently Contributing Editor at Unlimited, a columnist for the Sunday Star-Times, a regular broadcaster on radio and television and a frequent public speaker on business and economic issues. Rod is an adjunct professor in the New Zealand Centre for Innovation and Entrepreneurship at Unitec. Rao Ping-fan Dr. Rao is Professor and Dean of the College of Biosciences and Biotechnology, Fuzhou University, China. He founded the Institute of Biotechnology at Fuzhou University in 1993, and leads a group working on the active ingredients of traditional Chinese medicine and the industrialisation of traditional Chinese foods. He has published more than 120 papers, holds 8 patents and is the founder of and advisor to food and biotech companies. He is vice-president of the Chinese Institute of Food Science and Technology and on the IUfost governing council. He is a Visiting Professor at the University of Ulster and Queen’s University at Belfast, and co-supervisor of the University of Edinburgh PhD course. Marina Carcea Dr. Carcea is a senior Researcher in the Unit of Studies on Cereals at the National Institute of Research on Food and Nutrition (INRAN) Rome, Italy which she joined in 1989 following research in Italian and English Universities and with FAO. She is the author of more than one hundred scientific publications. She is a founding member, and on the executive of the Italian Association of Cereal Science and Technology. Her scientific opinion appears in Italian magazines, newspapers and in TV programmes. In 2004 she was the first woman to be awarded the international Harald Perten Prize for excellence in research in cereal science and technology. Makoto Kinjo Makoto Kinjo is the President of ANZCO Foods Japan Ltd, a 100% subsidiary of ANZCO Foods Limited, which is a New Zealand-based multi-national meat processing and marketing company with $1 billion turnover, seven processing sites throughout New Zealand, and marketing offices in the UK, Europe, USA, Taiwan and Japan as well as in New Zealand. Makoto joined ANZCO Foods in October 2000, after assuming various business development roles at Goodman Fielder, Wattie’s and Tip Top Ice Cream. Makoto has a commerce degree from Canterbury University. Barry McCleary Dr. McCleary is founder and co-owner of Megazyme International. Before founding Megazyme in 1988, he was Principal Research Scientist with the New South Wales Department of Agriculture. He is the author of scientific papers and book chapters on carbohydrates and enzymes. Many of the methods he developed are now international standard methods. He was the recipient of the F.B. Guthrie Medal “for contributions to Australian Cereal Chemistry in the broadest sense”, and in 2002 of the Harvey W. Wiley medal, AOAC International’s most prestigious award, for contributions to analytical chemistry. He is an AACCI and AOPACI Fellow. Thom Huppertz Dr Huppertz obtained an MSc in Dairy Science from Wageningen University (The Netherlands) in 1999 and was awarded a PhD at University College Cork (Ireland) in 2003 for his research on the effects of high pressure processing on constituents and properties of milk. He performed further postdoctoral studies at University College Cork on factors affecting milk protein functionality. In July 2006, he joined the University of Queensland as a senior research officer and is currently working on a number of topics related to properties and stability of milk proteins and implications thereof for dairy product functionality. April / May 2007 37 NZIFST Understand your market MIA NEWS MIA News Biosecurity research funding responsibilities concern MIA Funding responsibilities for Biosecurity New Zealand’s proposed �biosecurity research strategy for New Zealand’ are of concern to the Meat Industry Association (MIA), whose meat processing, marketing and exporting members account for about $5 billion of export revenue. While broadly supportive of the strategy outlined in Biosecurity New Zealand’s discussion paper (2006/05) “A Biosecurity Science, Research & Technology Strategy for New Zealand” that looks forward over the coming 25 years, MIA states, in a recent submission, that it does not agree with aspects of the funding responsibilities outlined in the paper. This is particularly with regard to funding of biosecurity science into surveillance programmes and diagnostics underpinning New Zealand’s international pest and disease reporting obligations. Contending that it is too simplistic to propose that the meat industry should pay for biosecurity science that relates to production diseases, the MIA argues that the paper understates the potential for the impacts of many diseases to be felt far beyond the industries involved in production. “As surveillance for many pests and diseases within New Zealand is undertaken to verify assurances of animal health status made by the New Zealand government to the OIE (the international standard setting organisation) to trade under the World Trade Organisation framework, we argue this gives surveillance a public benefit character,” explains MIA policy advisor Dave Harrison. “Responsibility for funding and improving the necessary surveillance programmes should accordingly fall to the Crown.” The MIA is also concerned at suggestions that funding responsibilities for surveillance programmes should fall only to the domestic production industries that are exposed to risks, rather than recognising that some responsibility should lie with industries that create risks. “For example, the potential for tourists to introduce and spread pests and diseases or for their introduction via imported produce is outside the meat industry’s control. We consider that those who engage in the activities that give rise to biosecurity risks should pay a part of the costs associated with surveillance programmes that manage those risks.” The MIA does support many of the priorities outlined in the paper, such as improving collaboration on biosecurity sciences, and improving the visibility of biosecurity science to improve uptake and also endorses the need for progress on the strategy to be regularly measured against meaningful and objective performance indicators. However, it submits that greater priority needs to be given to the development of surveillance and diagnostic tools for underpinning New Zealand’s international pest- and diseasefreedom reporting and to furthering understanding of the potential for feral animals to disperse serious pests and diseases. Harrison says that the MIA supports the 25-year vision contained within the strategy, but believes that it should also emphasise the importance of teamwork as a means of making the most of limited resources. “It would seem to us that effective collaboration and co-ordination will be paramount in ensuring that �excellence in science’ is achieved, and that the resulting science outcomes do, ultimately, better protect New Zealand in a practical sense. We suggest that effective collaboration and co-ordination should form an express part of the long-term vision for biosecurity science.” Challenges that need to be addressed include balancing economic values against social, cultural and environmental values and also the relatively small pool of resources available to commit to biosecurity research that will require equitable treatment of the diverse range of interests. Behavioural science, in determining the role of human behaviour with regard to biosecurity, will have a greater role to play in the future, the MIA predicts. “Biosecurity science should also aim to maintain and improve the credibility and robustness of New Zealand’s pest and disease free status, protecting New Zealand’s market advantage as an exporter of quality products.” Her Majesty congratulates NZ meat industry Meat & Wool New Zealand Chair, Jeff Grant 38 Food New Zealand Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II has written to congratulate the New Zealand meat industry on the anniversary that marks 125 years since the first frozen meat shipment that left New Zealand bound for the United Kingdom. The historical venture was the first step in creating what is now an export industry contributing $5.5 billion to the New Zealand economy. In the letter to Meat & Wool New Zealand chair, Jeff Grant, the Queen noted her interest in National Lamb Day on 15 February, celebrating the 125th anniversary and she sent her “warm, good wishes for a successful and enjoyable celebration.” Jeff Grant said many people had enjoyed New Zealand lamb on the 15th, not only in New Zealand and the UK but other points around the world, thanks to contact with New Zealand Embassies and High Commissions. Members of the New Zealand Parliament enjoyed a barbecue at Bellamy’s hosted by the Minister of Agriculture, the Hon Jim Anderton. Industry partners that supported the event were Retail Meat New Zealand, Meat & Wool New Zealand, the New Zealand Meat Industry Association and the New Zealand Beef & Lamb Marketing Bureau. There was even a function at Cambridge University in the UK attended by rugby and rowing club members – historically significant because members of the Cambridge Rowing Club were among the first to eat the New Zealand meat that arrived in 1882. Meat & Wool New Zealand also approached the New Zealand Meat Workers and Related Trades Union Inc with anniversary information for the meat workers. Reports from the William Davidson 125 conference will appear in the next issue of Food New Zealand. New animal welfare research areas proposed Do you have the best range of food processing equipment? If you’re in the food processing game, you probably understand the importance of having the right equipment to make your business efficient and profitable. FPE is the number one supplier of total food processing solutions to all types of meat and seafood processors, and primary industry in Australia and New Zealand. We have a wide range of equipment for every need including packing, multihead weighing, slicing, separating, forming and much more. And we only supply well-respected, proven brands all designed to help improve your bottom line. Are you within range when it comes to your food processing equipment? FPE029/COR/B/NZ Seven new animal welfare research areas have been proposed for operational research funding to the New Zealand Ministry of Agriculture & Forestry in a recent Meat Industry Association submission. Gaps in knowledge or where there is a requirement to tighten up the current procedures because of customer stipulations in New Zealand’s meat markets are detailed in the meat industry’s submission. These are: 1. Scientific standards from stunning to bleeding out in large animals 2. Objective criteria for determining the impact of processes on animal welfare 3. Scientific modelling for stock crate design 4. Alternative livestock washing methods 5. Develop/update science for New Zealand conditions 6. Impact on standing stock prior to transportation 7. Establishing the cause of downer cows With the increasing emphasis placed on animal welfare by customers, the MIA submits that it is important that New Zealand is able to scientifically demonstrate to both customers and the various authorities in importing countries that New Zealand’s ritual slaughter processes, particularly Halal slaughter, do not in any way compromise animal welfare, while still meeting the religious requirements. The organisation argues that it is also important to establish what is or is not acceptable in an animal welfare sense by using objective animal welfare measures rather than relying on more subjective criteria. Stock-crate design is a complex procedure as several parameters are in play including ventilation, roofing, loading densities, animal size, head height, temperature and time/length of travel and the MIA believes that creating and using a model for the design would help to optimise animal welfare. Another stressful point for livestock is washing prior to slaughter and while a number of improved methods have already been introduced to replace swim washing, the submission asks for scientific evidence to show the impact of alternative washing procedures on stress pre-slaughter. Developing and updating New Zealand animal welfare science is critical for the meat industry, the MIA says, as its members’ overseas customers – retailers, fast-food chains and supermarket chains – have rapidly changing requirements, often based on overseas farming practices that are not relevant to New Zealand environment. “It is becoming more difficult to defend the New Zealand practices due to new requirements and dated (New Zealand) science,” the submission argues, especially in areas like the provision of bedding straw in trucks and pens, the vocalisation test (and criteria), the roofing of crates and feeding of animals after 12 hours. Scientifically determining the best duration, from an animal welfare perspective, to stand stock off feed prior to transport requires to be established. This, the MIA believes, will give farmers supplying stock confidence in the current requirements which urge them to stop their livestock eating four to eight hours prior to transport to improve stock cleanliness, reduce cross-contamination during the freighting of livestock and to minimise the amount of effluent spilling onto roads from stock trucks. Finally, the MIA submits that operational research is needed to solve the mystery of why apparently fit lactating dairy cows go down either on the truck on arrival or soon after unloading at the plant. Establishing the cause of “downer cows” will help to educate dairy farmers “to understand the requirements of handling cattle prior to delivery and prevent any metabolic disorder that may occur.” April / May 2007 39 MIA NEWS New executive assistant at MIA Born in Nairobi, Kenya, Win moved to New Zealand while young and was raised in Wellington. Her EA/PA career in New Zealand and London, has given her a strong administrative and office management background and she’s looking forward to the challenge of a new industry to broaden her skills further. Win has worked in varied fields, including Berry & Walker accountants, the Ministry of Justice, Hutt Valley District Health Board and computer software company, Rebus. She has been married twice and has three adult children and four grandchildren and, in her spare time, enjoys self-development, reading, movies and walking. Win de Beaumont is Caryll Shailer’s new executive assistant and replaces Jane Davie Recent MIA submissions Other recent MIA reports, available for download at www.mia.co.nz/submissions, include submissions to: The Department of Labour on Quality Flexible Work: Increasing Availability and Take Up in New Zealand (20/12/06) The New Zealand Food Safety Authority on Cost Recovery Proposals under the Animal Products Act 1999 (15/12/06) The Transport and Industrial Relations Select Committee on the Injury Prevention, Rehabilitation and Compensation Amendment Bill (13/12/06) The Inland Revenue Department on Business Tax Review; Skills Training Tax Credits (30/11/06); Research and Development Tax Credits (30/11/06); Market Development Tax Credits (30/11/06) The Department of Labour on Proposed Amendments to Schedule 2 of the Injury Prevention, Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2001 (30/11/06) Affco adds dairy to product offering Meat processor and exporter Affco Holdings Ltd is adding dairy to its product portfolio, with its recent announcement that it is to set up a new wholly owned company, Dairy Trust Ltd. “Having considered growth options for the company for some time, the board had identified the New Zealand dairy sector as one which has strong investment potential,” Affco chairman Sam Lewis says. “New Zealand dairy products enjoy a first class reputation globally for quality and price competitiveness and the Affco board regards Affco Chairman, Sam Lewis it as an attractive sector for investment.” While there are synergies for the new company with Affco’s existing business, Lewis says that Affco’s role will be as investor only and Dairy Trust will operate with its own management and board and will, quite quickly, have a wider share-holding base than Affco. While remaining a decision for the Dairy Trust board, the intention is for the company to seek a listing on the New Zealand Stock Exchange (NZX) in 2008. Dairy Trust is intended to be a dairy processor, developing, owning and managing a small number of dairy plants around the country. Initially, it will acquire three sites from Affco in Wanganui, Northland and Waikato that are “surplus to Affco’s meat processing operations” and will also be looking for a fourth site in Southland. The acquisition of the Affco sites, together with certain buildings, plant, equipment and with rights to existing effluent and water treatment facilities, is significant as it will speed up processes as obtaining consent to develop its own facilities would be difficult and costly, the company says. Milk powder will probably form part of the early offering from the company, though considerable work remains to determine the optimum product mix, scale and design for the sites, which will be prioritised following the establishment and capitalisation of Dairy Trust, the company says. Established in 1904, Affco is the only meat company that is listed on the NZX. Now, together with Dairy Trust, it is part of the Motueka-based Talley family food empire that also owns fishing trawlers, seafood and vegetable processors, an ice-cream plant and a cheese company. 40 Food New Zealand MIA NEWS Meaty Morsels Snippets from the vast array of research, technical, market and policy information received by the Meat Industry Association. New Zealand Ambassador Chef, Graham Brown, takes a US culinary class New Zealand Lamb Oscar winner Peter Irvine with his grand champion Texels “Lamb Oscars” hit high gear – Peter and Susan Irvine from Timaru are the first New Zealand Lamb Oscar Grand Champions. Their Texel lamb was chosen as the tenderest, tastiest lamb from a line up of six finalists. Runners-up were Robert and Rosemary Gardyne from Winton with a Perendale/Texel cross. Farmers selected their best lambs before having them processed and scanned for yield at Alliance’s Mataura plant near Invercargill. The six meatiest lambs out of 2,500 entries were selected and went forward to the final �taste-off’. Three cuts; lamb rump, neck fillet and mid-loin chop, were taken from the finalist carcasses. They were cooked and tasted by a panel of judges who were looking for tenderness, aroma, flavour, texture and juiciness. Although only a pilot trial this year, it is intended the competition goes nation-wide in 2008. Steak of Origin returns – The challenge is on again to find New Zealand’s best tasting steak as the fifth Steak of Origin competition opens its doors. Farmers are currently preparing their stock for entry. A sirloin steak from each entrant is analysed at Lincoln University for tenderness, pH, percentage of marbling and percentage cooking loss. The tenderest steaks will go through to the semi-final for a taste-test before the top four steaks are selected in each of the four classes. The final, to select the Grand Champion, will be held on Monday, 14th May at the Beef Expo in Palmerston North. Collaborative New Zealand culinary classes in US – New Zealand lamb, Cervena, Greenshell Mussels and New Zealand wines are going to be presented to US culinary scholars in an exciting new collaborative effort by Meat & Wool New Zealand, Deer Industry New Zealand, the NZ Mussel Industry Council and Pernod-Ricard Ltd. Starting in March, New Zealand Ambassador Chef, Graham Brown, will teach classes of chefs-in-waiting, giving them key Greg Murphy judging the grand champion lamb nutritional facts and product qualities, and preparation information for each of the products in a series of interactive demonstrations for students on both coasts of the US. AgResearch signs agreement with Aussie national science agency – Agresearch signed a Heads of Agreement document with the Livestock Industries Division of Australia’s national science agency, the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO), in February. CSIRO is one of the world’s largest and most diverse research agencies and AgResearch is New Zealand’s largest Crown research institute. The agreement will formalise a working relationship built up over the past 18 months and extend it to involve more collaborative research projects. The relationship has already generated some results including the successful sequencing of the bovine genome, completed last year in collaboration with several other prestigious research organisations in North America and Europe. The arrangement will give the two organisations competitive advantage in strengthening their animal bioscience capabilities and will result in more efficient use of government and industry R&D resources, a CSIRO spokesman said. AgResearch customer relationship manager – Brian Dingwall is AgResearch’s new customer relationship manager. He brings a wealth of international experience to the role, which will assist the CRI to work more effectively with its clients. Dingwall has significant experience in the New Zealand meat industry and in developing and marketing functional foods and nutraceuticals. He was previously employed at meat processor-exporter Affco as development director, sales and marketing manager (beef), international business development director and marketing manager, before moving to bio-tech start-up, Stolle Biologics, as CEO. For further information on any of the above items contact the Meat Industry Association on 04 473 6465 or by email [email protected]. Visit the web-site www.mia.co.nz. April / May 2007 41 MIA NEWS Career in the Life of: Stewart Barnett Industry veteran, Stewart Barnett, has now stepped down from the Council of the Meat Industry Association (MIA), following his retirement in April as chief executive officer of this country’s largest meat processing company, the farmer co-operative PPCS. We look at his career and contribution to the MIA and the New Zealand meat food industry over the past half century. Born in Darfield in the 1940s, Stewart Barnett started his meat industry career 47 years ago as a Dalgety stock agent in Canterbury. He joined PPCS in 1972 as a lamb drafter and over the next decade or so moved steadily through marketing roles in New Zealand and the UK to become chief executive in 1986. In that time, he has seen the meat industry turn from commoditydominated, Board-controlled entity processing sheep and cattle into carcasses, into a thriving, commercial, market-driven, high technology food industry that contributes over $5 billion of export revenue annually to the New Zealand economy. Passionate about the industry Paying tribute to Stewart Barnett’s contribution to the New Zealand meat industry over the term of his career, MIA chair Bill Falconer notes that Barnett was a founder member of the MIA and was a staunch supporter of it as the process/export sector’s �trade body’. Barnett also played a big part in its predecessor bodies, including the Meat Exporters Council. He sat on the Meat Planning Council, the MIRINZ Board (for six years) and was the MIA representative on the New Zealand Meat Board for a number of years. In addition, he served on a myriad of other boards including the New Zealand Lamb Company, Deer Industry New Zealand, the New Zealand-US Council and biotechnology company, Global Technologies NZ Ltd. “Stewart was always passionate about the industry and even more so about his company’s role in it. He was at the helm during all of the industry’s major changes and made a singular contribution to it,” Falconer says. Graeme Lowe of Lowe Corporation, another founding member of the MIA Council, has worked alongside Barnett over the past 40 years. “In the time that I have known him he has been a staunch advocate for the New Zealand meat industry and has stuck to his principles and fought to improve the returns to farmers and shareholders alike.” Able to wear many �hats’ Wishing Barnett well in his retirement, Lowe adds,”With his retirement, it looks like I will be the only one of the old guard left.” John Upton, executive director of Mathias International, has been a fellow MIA Council member since 1996 and says that Barnett has contributed an immense amount of knowledge to the MIA and the wider industry during his career. Even though sometimes Barnett might sit in a meeting with three �hats’ on, Upton commended him on his ability to “distinguish very clear- 42 Food New Zealand Stewart Barnett ly between them. He could quite readily take one hat off and look at an issue from another point of view.” In an industry with a reputation for hardness, Barnett has earned respect for his business acumen and drive which has seen Dunedin-based PPCS grow from a South Island business with a $245 million turnover, when he became CEO in 1996, to over $2 billion today, with 24 meat processing plants throughout New Zealand. Companies like Fortex, Waitaki, Canterbury Frozen Meats (CFM), and Richmond New Zealand, along with Mair Venison, have been purchased by PPCS during his tenure. The company also wholly owns the Norwich-based British meat processor, PPCS Brooks, (formerly known as Brooks of Norwich) which has given it processing flexibility within the UK close to its huge supermarket customers. A strategic grasp of the sector Barnett was an MIA Council member for the whole of former MIA Executive Director, Brian Lynch’s, 11 year term. Lynch says he had the pleasure of meeting many industry personnel at all levels. “Three industry leaders stood-out from the rest for their obvious strategic grasp of the meat processing and export sector and where it might be taken in the right circumstances. Indisputably, Stewart was one of those three.” “He was one of the earliest to perceive the advantages for New Zealand to be extracted from the �guaranteed market access long-term’ that emerged from the Uruguay Round; the opportunities to move out of the frozen carcass trade towards chilled product in response to shifts in consumer expectations and lifestyles and the new technology available to do it; and the ramifications along the supply chain from farm to supermarket, of evolving the industry from a seasonal one to providing added value product near year-round. Stewart Barnett could be single-minded and strict but that was no bad thing, he recalls. “It reminded one always of the need to scan a policy or expenditure proposal and think, �Is this robust enough to withstand Stewart’s scrutiny?’. I was grateful for the ready access he granted when I needed it. Once his word was given it stuck.” His sense of humour was commented on by several. “Behind that sometimes dour exterior lurked a wicked sense of irreverent humour,” Lynch says. “He could be brusque when he wanted to get a message across, but also totally charming. He was a constant reminder of the saying �never confuse education and intelligence’. Stewart did not have a string of letters after his name, but he is one of the most intelligent and articulate people I’ve had the pleasure to work with.” MIA NEWS A straight talker Barnett’s straight-talking manner, particularly to the farmers he understood so well, is legendary. In the 1980s, when farmers were earning $15-18 off a lamb, one told him, “I need $30 a lamb”. He reply is reputed to have been, “Well then, you’ll have to staple the bastards together.” Chairman of Meat & Wool New Zealand, Jeff Grant, appreciated his working manner and is reported, by farmer journal Country-wide, to have said that “You always knew where you were with him. He made a solid contribution in his time as the MIA representative on the (Meat New Zealand) board….and (I) always found him enlightening to work with. Matching product to market “PPCS fought long and hard to move ahead in the industry. Stewart led the way. It wasn’t an easy path through the difficult times of the industrial relations and climatic demands. Stewart matched product into the market. That was a huge driver for co-operatives to perform.” Matching product to market was key to PPCS success, along with keeping an eye on the traditionally low margins in meat processing and restricting overhead costs. While building farmer ownership of the New Zealand meat industry was a primary goal behind PPCS’ tussle for ownership of Richmond New Zealand, (achieved finally in 2004) another reason for the purchase was so that the company could offer New Zealand Lamb for a longer season to its Northern Hemisphere customers, where it perfectly matches the production gap left by their own domestic producers. Meat brands now processed by PPCS, and sold into retail chains around the world, include Silver Fern, Canterbury Frozen Meat (CFM), Mayfield, Windward, Mair and Richmond. Products offered in the range include, lamb, mutton, beef and venison. A quieter future Stewart Barnett is moving on to a number of different projects, one of which no doubt will be spending more time with his wife Jocelyn – who is said to have never missed an MIA conference and to have done wonders to soften that occasional stern public image – their two adult daughters and two grandchildren. Meanwhile, Keith Cooper picks up the PPCS CEO’s reins and will join the MIA Council in his place. Career points 1944 Born, Darfield, Canterbury Darfield High School, 1960 Stock agent with Dalgety in Canterbury 1972-75 Lamb drafter PPCS, Alexandra 1975-78 Marketing position PPCS head office 1978-82 Manager PPCS UK Ltd 1982-86 Manager PPCS marketing 1985 Joined the MIA Council 1986 CEO PPCS 2007 Retired April / May 2007 43 MIA NEWS Major award for AgResearch scientist Dr Mike North, Senior Food Engineer in AgResearch’s Food Metabolism & Microbiology Section, is the 2007 Emerging Biotechnologist of the Year. Dr Mike North (left) receiving his award from Robin Congreve, chair of Neuren Pharmaceuticals The award recognises scientists under the age of 35 whose achievements clearly demonstrate potential for future leadership in biotechnology and was presented to Dr North at the NZBio conference awards dinner in early March. Dr North leads the meat quality and safety team based at the former Meat Industry Research Institute of New Zealand (MIRINZ), which is part of AgResearch’s Ruakura campus in Hamilton. Dr North says he was surprised when he was told that he had won the award. “I was driving and pulled over to answer my phone. I was shocked but delighted to hear that I had won as my work is in an area that is not probably considered �traditional’ biotechnology. The meat processing industry is one of the most important biological industries for the country and technology has been instrumental in New Zealand’s international success.” AgResearch Chief Executive Officer, Dr Andrew West, nominated Dr North for the award and says his work has generated significant commercial benefit for the meat and food industries of New Zealand. “His ongoing research has the potential to revolutionise the meat industry. His team of researchers will play a key role in ensuring that New Zealand’s red meat industry remains internationally competitive.” Dr North completed a B.Tech (Hons) in Food Technology from Massey University in Palmerston North in 1996 and in 2001 was awarded a PhD in Food Engineering by the same institution. In May 2000, he accepted a permanent position at AgResearch MIRINZ as a researcher and took on the leadership of a research project on modelling industrial cooking processes and measuring thermal properties of foods at elevated temperatures, carried out under contract to Meat & Wool New Zealand and 44 Food New Zealand the Foundation for Research, Science & Technology (FRST). As part of this work Dr North was chosen by AgResearch to spend six weeks at the University of California Davis, to study state-of-the-art food modelling techniques. AgResearch Food Metabolism & Microbiology Section Manager, Dr Warren McNabb, says Dr North not only learnt a lot from the trip but also passed his knowledge on to industry in New Zealand. “The models of cooking processes developed by Dr North have been passed on to New Zealand meat and food companies. These design tools have helped to ensure the achievement of high quality and appropriate safety outcomes with minimum cost and maximum product yield.” Since July 2002 Dr North has led the Advanced Food Processing objective of the FRST-funded programme �Foods that Delight’. The goal of this programme is to add value to the New Zealand food industry through new knowledge and novel technologies that can customise foods’ organoleptic properties to market requirements. Dr North’s Advanced Food Processing objective has developed advanced design tools and implementation techniques to enable food-manufacturing industries to create new premium foods. One example is the expansion of Food Product Modeller™ v.3, a user-friendly software package for the design of new food processes, and innovative fundamental models to predict thermal properties of complex food structures. In July 2004, he took up leadership of a programme funded by FRST and Meat & Wool New Zealand that measures and predicts meat quality attributes on-line using near infrared spectrometry. “This technology has the potential to revolutionise the meat processing industry by non-destructively measuring the eating and keeping quality of all meat cuts on-line, in the processing plant – a feat never before achieved,” says Dr McNabb. He says the work has been very successful to date, with a prototype spectrophotometer developed and calibrations against important meat quality attributes under development. Dr North has been responsible for managing thirty staff over the last 18 months in the areas of meat science, food safety, and food engineering. He is Deputy Chair of the New Zealand International Institute of Refrigeration, an industry body that advises Government and private sector organisations. “Under Mike’s leadership the section strengthened its relationship with the New Zealand meat industry by running the inaugural AgResearch MIRINZ Industry Workshop, which disseminates the findings of new research,” says Dr McNabb. The previous two winners of the award, Dr Adrian Cookson and Dr Sue McCoard, were also members of AgResearch’s Food Metabolism & Microbiology Section. “I have some fantastically talented colleagues who make working here very stimulating,” says Dr North. RESEARCH Technology to improve bread quality The laser �eye’ visible on a loaf of bread The on-line laser measuring and recording setup R & D partnerships Business manager with Crop & Food Research, Tim Lindley, says small research grants from the Baking Industry Research Trust are helping members of the industry understand the benefits of R & D as well as the benefits of partnerships. “These types of projects allow people in the industry to use their imaginations and deliver solutions that might not otherwise have been thought of.” He says a recent example of such a project is likely to bring cost savings to the industry. The project involved the use of laser technology to measure physical attributes of individual loaves of bread as they travel along a production line. Enormous numbers of measurements can be taken, allowing for quick detection of what is commonly known in the industry as sidewall collapse and/or top cave. Production staff are thus able to quickly detect changes and modify production parameters as required to minimise or eliminate the problem. Benefiting the baker The project was funded by the Baking Industry Research Trust and managed by Duane Trotter from Goodman Fielder’s technical support team. When reflecting on his project, Mr Trotter echoes the thoughts of Dr Lindley. “Baking is not an exact science,” he says. “When a less-than-perfect loaf comes off the end of a line, you have to consider any number of things that might have changed in the baking process. “What we did was use laser technology to measure each loaf of bread for side collapse and top cave as they moved along the conveyor rather than physically measure each loaf. The information was captured directly on a computer. “It meant we could quickly pick up on anomalies or patterns and track them back to corresponding bakery equipment or process. “I think the best part of the research is that it can be done in real-time. We can get valuable information that can be analysed straight away.” Mr Trotter says Crop & Food Researcher Arran Wilson, who developed the software, was a crucial partner. “I couldn’t have done it without the support of Arran who brought his wealth of experience in baking research to the project.” Fine detail Dr Lindley says that in the factory where the equipment was tested, the data revealed patterns leading the researchers to conclude that the strap system, where tins of baking dough are placed side by side in rows in the oven, was not optimal. “Given this sort of data, it becomes a cost/benefit question,” Dr Lindley says. “It may be that the anomaly in the loaf is minor and does not justify the expense of changing the strap or it may be that capital reinvestment is well worth the expense. Ultimately, this technology will help managers make that sort of crucial decision. In the long run the data at least help them to quickly isolate the problem.” April / May 2007 45 NZIFST CAREERS Update on Careers Initiatives Jenny Dee Our careers initiatives have got off to a flying start for the year CREST Careers brochure Last year Council supported a proposal from Abby Thompson that NZIFST approach its members to provide grants for students doing Silver or Gold CREST projects related to food. CREST (Creativity in Science and Technology) is a nationally recognised awards framework, supported by the Royal Society of New Zealand, which fosters interest in, and rewards excellence in Science and Technology amongst primary and secondary students. The awards are non-competitive – all students whose projects meet the criteria achieve the award. Abby has been working with Jessie McKenzie of CREST and Carol Pound, CREST Gold Assessor, to work out the details. On the facing page you will find a request for your support for this initiative. The latest CREST newsletter, which highlights some of last year’s CREST awards, has been posted on our website www. nzifst.org.nz. One of our highest priorities for the year is to develop and print a careers brochure. Once again, Futureintech is helping us with this, and we hope to have it ready for distribution in April. We are currently seeking profiles and professional photos of young graduates at work in the food industry, to feature in the brochure. Please contact Rosemary Hancock, [email protected] if you can contribute. ChemEd Conference presentation Bronwen Smith, from the University of Auckland, Department of Chemistry, has agreed to do a presentation about careers in the food industry, and run a workshop for teachers on the science of ice cream at the ChemEd 007 Conference in Auckland in July. ChemEd007 is the biennial conference for chemistry educators at secondary and tertiary level. Scholarship proposal Phil Bremer is putting the finishing touches to a proposal that NZIFST approach its members to provide first year scholarships to the value of $500, to students enrolled in science, technology or engineering degrees relevant to the food industry. Enhancing visibility Thanks to the Royal Society of New Zealand (RSNZ), the Institute has been allocated a page in each issue this year of NZ Science Teacher, the Journal of the NZ Association of Science Educators. The articles, titled “Just for Starters…” will provide snippets of information about the food industry. Our goal is to make teachers more aware of the application of science, technology and engineering in our industry. Hamish Conway from Goodman Fielder has offered to write the articles on our behalf. The RSNZ also offered us the opportunity to publish an Alpha brochure profiling young graduates pursuing science, technology and engineering careers in the food industry. Gerrit Meerdink from Massey University has offered to co-ordinate collection of the profiles. Angela Christie from Futureintech and Jessie McKenzie have agreed to help select the profiles that best represent the wide variety of graduates we employ and careers they pursue, and Futureintech will write the profiles in such a way that they will appeal to our target audience – secondary students and their parents. 46 Food New Zealand Teacher fellows Two 2007 NZ Science Mathematics and Technology Teacher Fellows have accepted our offer of complimentary NZIFST membership. We welcome Jo Hutt from Christchurch and Helen McCallum from Nelson, and look forward to working with them throughout the year. We have already received requests from two teachers for support with their applications for Teacher Fellowships for 2008. All eight of the TechLink Beacon Practice Teachers accepted our offer of complimentary copies of Food NZ, and asked to be added to their respective branch email lists. We look forward to meeting them. Futureintech relationship Our relationship with Futureintech has been strengthened. In March I started working part time as a Futureintech Facilitator in Hawke’s Bay. In this role I am responsible for facilitating support, from young scientists, engineers and technologists working in local industry, for students and maths, science, technology and careers teachers, at ten local schools. I am expecting this work to generate a lot more ideas about how NZIFST can support schools and get involved in promoting careers in the food industry. NZIFST CAREERS NZIFST seeks grants for CREST Projects Abby Thompson NZIFST seeks the support of its members and their employers for a new careers initiative - to offer grants to students doing CREST projects within the general areas of food science and technology The National Careers Committee and Executive would like to strongly encourage you to consider supporting this inexpensive but worthwhile initiative to foster the young scientists and technologists of the future. Outline of awards structure CREST (Creativity in Science and Technology) is a nationally recognised awards framework, supported by the Royal Society of New Zealand (RSNZ), which fosters interest and rewards excellence in science and technology amongst secondary students. Students doing CREST projects are given authentic experience in scientific and technological practice, working with experts from industry to complete projects focused on finding creative solutions to practical problems that are of real significance. They learn a wide range of skills, including creativity, innovation, goal setting, problem-solving, risk management and perseverance. The students involved in the CREST scheme are highly motivated and academically sound individuals who wish to stretch themselves through undertaking a constructive and challenging project with the support of top-quality scientists and technologists. By providing the opportunity for the students to apply for grants to help fund projects, which have a significant food science or technology, focus, we hope to encourage more secondary students to choose food related projects. This will help reinforce to these talented students (and their teachers, classmates and parents) that food science and technology is challenging and exciting, and offers a rewarding and professional career path. CREST students work with a mentor on their specific project, usually a scientist or technologist who has some experience in the general topic area. Ideally, we would like the company providing the grant to also provide a mentor, so a personal relationship is established between the student and the food industry. Mentoring is not an onerous job, providing the opportunity for both the student and mentor to have a rewarding experience through the completion of the project, and is expected to take 2 or 3 hours per month. Where a company is unable to supply a mentor, a local NZIFST member will be approached to fill this role. As well as participating in their CREST award, students often enter their CREST projects in their local science fairs, with a high degree of success. The successes of such projects provide further opportunities to publicise food science and technology in a positive light within the wider community. At the completion of their project, all sponsored students will be invited to attend a meeting of their local NZIFST branch to give a presentation on their project. Grant application evaluation Any student undertaking a Silver, Team Silver, Gold or Team Gold CREST project who has had their project approved by CREST and completed their first progress check may apply to be considered for a $250 grant. It is expected the recipient will spend this money on the purchase of equipment or consumables required to undertake and complete a CREST project. It may also be used to pay for specialist consultation or for testing or analysis that cannot realistically be performed by the student. Grants will be awarded through a competitive process, where a panel of NZIFST, CREST and industry members will assess submitted projects in terms of their overall potential to demonstrate innovative and high-quality food technology or science. Each grant will be sponsored by a specific company involved in the New Zealand food industry, and where possible, successful projects will be matched with the sponsoring company most likely to be able to offer practical advice to the student on the project area. Applications for funding will be considered twice each year; in 2007 the close off dates are 30 April and 30 September. Planning for the first round is well underway, with information on the grants distributed to the high schools involved in the CREST scheme in early March, and one application already received. The Institute of Food, Nutrition and Human Health at Massey University has also started the sponsorship ball rolling, with the first offer to provide a grant and mentor. If you are interested in offering a grant and/or mentor, please advise Rosemary Hancock, [email protected]. Rosemary will keep a register of potential sponsors. The assessment panel will allocate projects and students to the most appropriate sponsors. April / May 2007 47 NZIFST CAREERS Working as a Futureintech Ambassador Anna Smith I currently work for Fonterra Brands NZ Ltd as a Development Technologist. Some of our main brands include Anchor, Fresh �n’ Fruity, Calci-yum, Country Goodness and Mainland. In my day-to-day activities I work on many different aspects of developing a product, from formulation development to running trials in the factory. As a Futureintech Ambassador, I was asked to present to Papatoetoe West School 7-8 year-olds who were working on a unit about milk. The students had just learnt about pasteurisation and homogenisation of fresh milk and I was asked to explain the changes that occur to milk to make a dairy product. I decided to talk about the process we use to make yoghurt. I talked about the ingredients used to make yoghurt, their particular functions, and also the processing, fermentation (including the cultures used) and packaging. Along with discussing the types of packaging, I explained what was required for Fonterra Brands’ Anna Smith at Papatoetoe West School 48 Food New Zealand labelling, storage and transport. I made the presentation as interactive as I could for the children, by asking questions where appropriate, and asking for their ideas; for example I asked what their favourite flavours were and what I should develop next. Strawberry was a clear favourite, and some new ideas included chocolate chip, kiwifruit and cookies and cream. I think the presentation was great for all involved. Sometimes �seeing is believing’, or in this case, hearing about what I do and how things are made, reinforced and extended what they had already learnt. My presentation showed them that the processes of pasteurisation and homogenisation were not just applicable to fresh milk, and that the basic science principles they are taught at school are applicable in the “real world” of the food processing industry. Hopefully I have sparked an interest in learning more about the processing of foods in some of the students. – the First New Zealand/Australia Sensory Network Symposium, January 2007 Down-to-earth science The unspoken theme of the first Annual New Zealand/Australia Sensory Network Symposium, held at Shakespear Regional Park just North of Auckland, was �down-to-earth science delivering a comprehensible and useful message’. This is not easy to achieve when working in the realm of statistical analysis but keynote speaker and internationally acclaimed statistician Tom Carr managed to capture the imaginations and commitment of 47 sensory practitioners on Day 1 of the symposium. He made it very clear that they were to �interpret, not explain’ the data carefully generated to paint a detailed picture of the product being profiled. As participants made their way through the challenges of Key Drivers/Preference Mapping and Thurstonian Scaling in the Sensory Statistics Workshop, Mr. Carr consistently brought them back to earth with specific examples of their use in making product development decisions, marketing decisions or in tracking and understanding the change in perception of a particular sample over time. Research reports Day 2 of the symposium was devoted to research presentations from the field and covered topics from factors affecting the motivation of trained panelists to the use of principal components analysis (PCA) for monitoring beer flavour consistency, with other presentations on sensory issues surrounding wine, baked goods, hop essential oils and the sourness of fruit. Several presenters highlighted the statistical principles and techniques covered by Mr. Carr that they were applying in their current research, which reinforced the previous day’s learning. Several presentations were by students from the University of Otago and offered industry representatives an insight into the interests and capabilities of up-and-coming talent. An informal atmosphere According to the organisers, the symposium was �intended to be informal in nature and designed for maximum networking and interaction with other sensory professionals.’ This intention was clearly realised as sensory practitioners from research institutes as well as the wine, beer, dairy, snack food, beverage and spice industries found common ground in their work as well as their play. Generous sponsorship by several food companies ensured participants did not go hungry or thirsty and made certain that the dialogue would keep flowing. The modest accommodation with shared facilities guaranteed an unpretentious setting in which experts as well as newcomers to the field could swap questions and answers, both during sessions as well as while walking on the nearby beach in break sessions. And to top it all off, the weather couldn’t have been more glorious that week, dazzling the American and Australian visitors into thinking New Zealand really is the paradise touted abroad. 2007 Symposium Next year it will be the Australians who host the 2nd Annual New Zealand/Australia Sensory Network Symposium. Possible locations are Sydney, Melbourne or Adelaide and more information will be available by July or August 2007. Are you tired of spending half your day creating SpeciÚcations or Label Design Briefs when you could be doing more important tasks? Label Live TM is a software product that automatically creates Label Information reports using “live” data you enter only once. The data is entered into a Sage PFW ERP food manufacturing database and then Üows through to reports with a format you can easily customise. Outputs include: • • • • Ingredient listings with % characterising and compound descriptions Nutrition Information Panels (that can account for moisture loss) Presence of substances requiring declarations on labels, e.g. allergens GM & Irradiation Status and a range of notes including claims and marketing text To book an on-site demonstration phone + 64 9 373 4566 or email [email protected] Elgenio Ltd is a joint venture between & TM &3, Formula Systems Ltd April / May 2007 49 SENSORY SYMPOSIUM Conference report ROVING REPORTER Despatches from our roving reporter By Dave Pooch The South Pacific connection The Institute’s Food Safety DVD got a tropical airing recently. I used it as a resource on a recent trip to Tonga to give a one-week training course on Food Processing in the capital, Nuku’alofa. Tonga’s Director of the new Food Division in their Ministry of Agriculture, Mr Manaia Halafihi, is keen to develop food processing in Tonga and asked NZAid, (within our Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade) to fund some training. Tonga is New Zealand’s near neighbour to the North East, marginally closer than Fiji and thoroughly tropical. With its fertile soils and strong agricultural base, Tonga produces an excess of food. While some root crops like taro and cassava are exported fresh, there is little done by way of processing. Mr Halafihi hopes this will change! Roving reporter note. Off season, flights to Tonga are quite reasonable and it makes for an interesting and less-visited tourist destination. They’re watching our Food Safety DVD here! The Thailand connection Hathairat Rimkeeree is a Thai. No surprise then that I found her to be endlessly polite and helpful. What’s more, she is a food technologist and one of the many that Dr Mary Earle trained at Massey. She studied at Palmerston North for her Masters and PhD in product development at Massey 1989 to 1994 then went back home to teach at the Department of Product Development in Kasetsart University in Bangkok. Recently your roving reporter was in Bangkok and Hathairat Rimkeeree of visited Kasetsart. Kasetsart University in The food technology connecBangkok tion between New Zealand and Thailand goes back many years and I was curious about the link and the nature of study in Thailand. Kasetsart is a long established university in suburban Bangkok with a student population of 20,000. The main campus is in the same general area as Don Muang, Bangkok’s old airport that many Kiwis will have been through. Mary Earle helped establish their four-year BSc (Food Technology) degree in 1980 and today there are about 100 students in each year, of whom about 30 do post graduate studies. Students are 80% female and new graduates go to familiar 50 Food New Zealand sounding jobs in industry; production supervisor, research and development and quality control. Others go to family owned businesses, sales or post graduate studies. Like their kiwi counterparts, Thai students pay fees; about $NZ500 per semester and there is a student loan scheme. This sounds very reasonable but new graduates earn some $NZ600 per month so repaying a student loan is an issue, as it is here. The degree course has a novel feature in the final year. The class forms a group that prepares a detailed submission to the university to get funding to make a food product (usually a bakery item) on a commercial basis. The students allocate the roles; production, marketing, finance etc. When they get the funding, the students make the product, sell it and get to keep the profits. Food processing is one of Thailand’s success stories. It has become the world’s biggest producer of canned tuna and second biggest of frozen shrimps. Other Thai products such as canned coconut cream, chili sauce and pan coated confectionery products are now readily available in New Zealand supermarkets; not so when Mary Earle first went there! Currently around 52 institutions in Thailand teach food technology (Thailand has a population of some 61 million and area just twice that of New Zealand). Demand for food technologists is growing steadily despite other parts of the Thai economy having had some ups and downs over the last 10 years. This has reassured students about their chances of finding a job. Perhaps like New Zealand, most new graduates like to work around the capital or another large city and are less keen on the rural based agri-processing facilities. EVENTS Conference Diary List compiled by Dr David Everett, University of Otago May 6-10, 2007 June 16-20, 2007 July 28 - August 1, 2007 31st International Congress of the European Brewery Convention Venice, Italy www.ebc-nl.com 71st Annual Meeting: American Society of Brewing Chemists Victoria, British Columbia, Canada meeting.asbcnet.org Institute of Food Technologists Chicago, Illinois, USA www.ift.org May 9-11, 2007 June 17-22, 2007 Food & Feed Extrusion Short Course Massey University, Palmerston North 15th International Federation of Fruit Juice Producers Congress The Hague, The Netherlands www.ifu2007.com ICoMST 2007 – 53rd International Congress of Meat Science and Technology Beijing, China www.icomstchina53.org.cn/Themeet/ invitation.jsp June 19-21, 2007 August 7-9, 2007 NZIFST Conference: FOOD - the challenges Wellington www.nzifst.org.nz Food Ingredients South America 2007 Sao Paulo, Brazil south-america.fi-events.com/content/default. aspx May 9-11, 2007 Functional Foods in Europe: International Developments in Science and Health Claims Malta europe.ilsi.org/events/upcoming/ functionalfoods.htm May 13-16, 2007 98th AOCS Annual Meeting & Expo Including session on Food Structure & Functionality Québec City, Canada www.aocs.org/meetings/annual_mtg/ May 14-18, 2007 August 12-16, 2007 June 19-22, 2007 13th International Conference for Grain and Oil Science & Technology China www.icc.or.at/newsletter/2006-11-30 IDF Symposium on Lactose and Lactose Derivatives Moscow, Russia www.fil-idf.org www.lactose.ru June 21-25, 2007 May 15-17, 2007 June 24-27, 2007 Ingredients and Ingredient Functionality Workshop Lincoln, NE, USA fpc.unl.edu/Workshops/ingredients.shtml 40th Anniversary Annual AIFST Convention Celebrating 40 years with 20/20 visioin Melbourne, Australia www.airfst.asn.au May 17, 2007 IDF Regional Conference on Fermented Milks - Technology and Nutrition Moscow, Russia www.fil-idf.org May 21-25, 2007 IDF/ISO Analytical Week Munich, Germany www.fil-idf.org May 21-25, 2007 12th IUPAC Symposium on Mycotoxins and Phycotoxins Istanbul, Turkey www.atal.tubitak.gov.tr/iupac2007mycotoxin/ June 13-15, 2007 5th NIZO Dairy Conference: Prospects for Flavour Formation and Perception Papendal, Arnhem, Netherlands www.NIZOdairyconf.elsevier.com June 14-15, 2007 2nd World Congress on Prevention and Therapies against Obesity: Innovation and Perspectives in the Obesity Field Paris, France www.isanh.com/anti-obesity August 5-10, 2007 2007 Annual Meeting: BEMA - The Baking Industry Suppliers Association San Diego, CA, USA www.bema.org June 27-29, 2007 Natural Products Expo Asia Hong Kong, China www.naturalproductsasia.com/eng_main. php June 28-30, 2007 GiFEX 2007 (China Guangzhou International Western Food Culture Expo) Guangzhou, China www.gifex.cn July 8-11, 2007 The International Association for Food Protection 94th Annual Meeting Lake Buena Vista, Florida, USA www.foodprotection.org July 8-12, 2007 American Dairy Science Association San Antonio, Texas, USA www.adsa.org July 10-13, 2007 FENS 2007 - 10th European Nutrition Conference, Palais des Congrès de Paris Paris, France www.fens2007.org:80 7th Pangborn Sensory Science Symposium Minneapolis-St Paul, Minnesota, USA www.pangborn2007.com August 30 - September 4, 2007 Food Micro 2008 (sic) Aberdeen, Scotland, UK [email protected] September 3-5, 2007 Linnaeus 2007: International Conference on Food and Nutrition Uppsala, Sweden www.linnaeus2007.se September 12-14, 2007 1st International Symposium on Gluten Free Cereal Products and Beverages Ireland www.icc.or.at/newsletter/2006-11-30 September 12-13, 2007 China International Food Safety & Quality Conference 2007 Beijing, China www.chinafoodsafety.com September 17-18, 2007 Principles of Extruder Die Design short course Sydney, Australia. Organised by FoodStream Pty Ltd. http://www.foodstream.com.au/ diedesigncourse/ September 17-19, 2007 Symbiosis - 13th European Congress on Biotechnology Barcelona, Spain www.ecb13.eu September 19-20, 2007 LMC Congress 2007: Innovations in Food Technology Copenhagen, Denmark www.lmc.dk/english/congress2007 If you would like us to include your course or conference in this listing contact Dr David Everett, [email protected] April / May 2007 51
© Copyright 2024 Paperzz