May 2004 vol. 7, no. 2 New Developments in Prostate Cancer Treatment Save the Date! PCRI 2004 Regional Conference Scheduled for October This year’s PCRI regional prostate cancer conference will be held on Saturday, October 9 in the Mayer and Hastings auditoriums on the USC Norris Campus in Los Angeles. Many of the events that have made PCRI conferences so popular will again be staged: Free PSA testing, CME credit, eminent panels of speakers and information booths. ❏ Patient and Physician in Co-Partnership About the Medical Articles in this Issue The Linkage Between Obesity and Prostate Cancer By David Heber, MD (Page 6) There is a broad base of evidence that obesity may promote the development and progression of prostate cancer. In this article, Dr. Heber first compares the incidence of cancer within countries where obesity is rare to that of the U.S. and other Western countries. He then examines the biological processes that are common to both obesity and cancer that could lead to a causal interrelationship. He cites numerous sources that correlate high fat intake with prostate cancer. He contends that the effects of a high-fat diet on PC are partially explained by the changes in hormones resulting from that diet and by the decreasing body mass associated with aging. He concludes that for PC and other common forms of cancer, there is a clear association of obesity with cancer risk, incidence, or progression. Options for Post-Prostatectomy Incontinence By Gary E. Leach, MD (Page 8) Dr. Leach defines the main causes of post-prostatectomy incontinence as (1) high pressure developing in the bladder as the bladder fills, (2) damage to the sphincter muscle, and (3) a combination of the two: With treatment directed by a process called urodynamic testing that measures urinary flow, he says, the majority of men are able to experience significant improvement in urinary control. Medications such as Detrol, Ditropan, and the Oxytrol patch relax the bladder and thereby reduce high bladder pressures. For treatment of high bladder pressures for This year, we are providing three new features: A Spanish-language breakout session on therapies for newly diagnosed patients, ED and incontinence sessions, and a lunchtime support session for wives and partners. You’ll be able to participate, too. Time has been allotted for interaction between the speakers and the audience. So set aside October 9 now, because you won’t want to miss this conference. The cost will be only $15 and that will include lunch, parking, and eight hours filled with ideas and information about PC. Look for more information at the PCRI Web site: www.pcri.org. patients who do not respond to medication, an Interstim “bladder pacemaker” can be implanted to relax the bladder through electric stimulation. Surgical treatments of stress incontinence due to sphincter damage following prostatectomy include the Artificial Urinary Sphincter and the Male Sling Procedure, implants that permit control of the urethra. High-Dose Ketoconazole Plus Hydrocortisone (HDK + HC) (Page 3) High-dose ketoconazole is an oral anti-PC agent that is diagnosed in order to lower testosterone levels by blocking various endocrine pathways. It has also been shown to have direct cancer killing action on PC cells. HDK has been studied as a PC drug for almost two decades, but initially side effects limited its use. Today, however, it is widely believed that HDK +HC may be a reasonable treatment approach for men with PC for whom androgen deprivation therapy was insufficient. A number of HDK+HC studies have reported significant lowering of PSA levels and/or improvements in bone pain. The article describes side effects of HDK and lists drugs that have negative interactions with HDK. The article concludes that HDK has great potential for the therapy of PC if appropriate precautions are taken. “Can You Hear Me Now?” Most of what has been published up to this point in Insights has been directed toward men with prostate cancer. However, we know that men who are living with prostate cancer are, in most cases, not alone in their journey with the disease. The partner of the man with prostate cancer is so important, even critical, in every aspect of this disease, from diagnosis to researching treatment options and side effects, and recovery. Beginning with this article dealing with the need for open communication, we intend to follow up with subsequent pieces addressing issues that we hope will be of interest to the partners of men with prostate cancer. “The commitment to communication is essential between couples who are living with prostate cancer and its side effects.” This message came across loud and clear at a recent community talk at the USC/Norris Cancer Center in Los Angeles where former Pennzoil Corp. President and C.O.O. Richard (Dick) Howe, Ph.D. spoke candidly about his personal experiences with erectile dysfunction (ED) and urinary incontinence that resulted from a radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer in 1991. Together with his wife, Desiree, who rounded out the talk from a partner’s perspective, it was clear that in spite of the many challenges they have faced throughout their years together, they have a satisfying, healthy relationship mainly because of their commitment to openly communicate with each other. (continued on page 2) “Can You Hear Me, Now?” continued from page 1 In her book, His Prostate and Me: A Couple Deals with Prostate Cancer (Winedale Publishing), Desiree Lyon Howe draws upon personal experiences and lends an impassioned wife’s perspective on the journey with her husband and prostate cancer, ED and urinary incontinence. Both were widowed at the time they met and soon discovered they shared many common interests (including medicine), although Desiree confessed that Dick’s idea of inviting her over to watch “a really exciting video” (A Radical Prostatectomy) almost ended their budding romance. She soon learned that a relationship with Dick meant not only learning everything there is to know about prostate cancer, but also recognizing and sharing his drive to communicate with other men the importance of testing and being educated about the disease. Desiree points out that while a man is more likely to feel at ease talking to other men about his disease and the side effects, he may be less likely to communicate on an intimate level with his partner about these issues. She adds, “Communication is the essence of intimacy, and women seek and respond to intimacy. When a man does not use his wife or partner as a major link in his support system, he generally raises her level of frustration and, in turn, increases the possibility that she will raise her own barrier in the relationship.” In addition, the differences in the way men and women communicate can add even more of a challenge to communicating successfully. “Men communicate in a less empathetic manner than women, probably as a means for them to maintain their sense of control and competency or give others the appearance that they are capable individuals,” whereas “most women by nature pull back from confrontational issues. When this happens, honest communication goes by the wayside and is often difficult, if not impossible to regain,” Desiree says. If your man doesn’t communicate his concerns and fears to you, there is a chance you may begin to feel inadequate, rejected, unattractive, unloved, shut out, and in your quest to be loving, understanding, and supportive, you may push your man to talk about his feelings, causing resentment and silence on his part, the opposite outcome you hoped to achieve. You may expect your man to know what’s on your mind without having to tell him; he may expect you to know how he feels with- “When a man does not use his wife or partner as a major link in his support system, he generally raises her level of frustration and, in turn, increases the possibility that she will raise her own barrier in the relationship.” out having to express it. These expectations can lead to feelings of mistrust, anger, anxiety, depression, grief, embarrassment, shame and frustration in both of you. Conversely, good communication can lead to intimacy on many levels: emotional, spiritual, mental and physical. Though a diagnosis of prostate cancer or side effect like ED or incontinence can strain a relationship, it often times can turn into a positive experience that strengthens and adds intimacy to a relationship. Desiree also emphasizes that a “couple’s basic relationship, including their ability to openly communicate,” is the most important factor in dealing with these sensitive issues. Finally, when talking with your partner, keep in mind her belief that “communication is always a major part of the answer to most every problem.” If you would like to comment on this article, suggest a topic for a future article, or share a story (anonymously) that might benefit partners or couples living with prostate cancer, please write to Diana Garnand at [email protected]. Points to Ponder How do you develop good communication in your relationship? ❏ Be sensitive. Understand that your man may avoid talking to you about his ED or incontinence because he is embarrassed or ashamed. ❏ Be direct. Are you saying the same thing differently? Does it take you a paragraph to say the same thing that he can express in one sentence? ❏ Be encouraging. Encourage “real” communication and openness and help him realize that avoiding difficult subjects will not make the problem go away, but will compound them. ❏ Recognize your differences. Pushing him to talk about his problems may cause him to tune out; being empathetic and understanding of his feelings while gently reminding him that you are concerned may yield better results. ❏ Don’t dump. Rather than react or unload when he opens up to you, give him a chance to express himself and his concerns without interrupting. ❏ Find a middle ground. Reach a level of understanding that satisfies each of you, and know when to stop or move on. ❏ Talk it out. Remind him in subtle ways of the importance of “talking through” your dilemma and how this can help create more intimacy between you. ❏ Summarize. Review what he shared with you so that he feels understood. Ask him to do the same for you. 2 High Dose Ketoconazole Plus Hydrocortisone (HDK+ HC) Prepared by the PCRI Helpline Staff with oversight by Richard Lam, M.D. High-dose ketoconazole (HDK) is an oral broad-spectrum anti-prostate cancer (PC) agent that has testosterone lowering effects through its abilities to decrease both testicular and adrenal production of androgens by blocking various endrocrine pathways. Thus, it is a form of androgen deprivation therapy. More specifically, HDK is classified as a P450 enzyme inhibitor and has also been shown to have direct cell killing action on PC cells.2 As a result, HDK plus hydrocortisone (HC), which is needed to replace natural cortisol production that may be lost when Nizoral is used, may be a reasonable treatment approach for men with prostate cancer (PC) for whom primary androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) was insufficient. The treatment of systemic prostate cancer is often a progressive selection of therapies based on the cancer cell population. ADT is usually the first treatment selected when the PC is diagnosed as systemic. The object of ADT is to reduce the androgens that are promoting PC growth. Primary ADT usually consists of an LHRH agonist such as Lupron (leuprolide acetate) or Zoladex (goserelin acetate) plus an anti-androgen such as Casodex (bicalutamide) or Eulexin (flutamide). And some physicians add a third drug called a 5-alpha reductase inhibitor, either finasteride (Proscar) or dutasteride (Avodart), to inhibit the production of dihydrotestosterone (DHT). If PC tumors are primarily comprised of “androgen-dependent” cells, ADT may control tumor activity for an extended period of time. Proper management of ADT requires measuring the testosterone to assure that a castrate level is maintained. This concept was covered in detail in the August 2001 and October 2001 issues of Insights. * AG is a second-line hormonal androgen blocker that is now used only rarely in the U.S. PC that no longer responds to ADT is sometimes mistakenly identified as “hormone refractory” while in reality it often responds to secondary hormonal manipulations such as HDK, Aminoglutethimide (AG)* or the synthetic estrogen DES (diethylstilbestrol). This article is devoted to the overview and discussion of HDK+HC. Since PC is so unique in its inherent sensitivity to changes in levels of male sex hormones, trying HDK plus HC may be an option if it becomes clear that primary ADT is no longer fully effective in suppressing testosterone. HDK can rapidly lower serum testosterone to castrate levels. For example, HDK administration results in a decline in serum testosterone within 30 minutes and a 90% reduction by 48 hours3 (see Figure 1). HDK also has a direct cell-killing effect on the prostate cancer cell (see Figure 2). In vitro tests of two human cell lines of androgen-independent prostate cancer, PC-3 and Du-145, showed that HDK had direct cell-killing effects at serum values that were clinically attainable (1.1 to 10.0 mcg/ml).2 in the pre-PSA era and in the current era of using PSA as a surrogate biomarker of disease response. In the pre-PSA era, Pont et al reported an 88% decrease or disappearance of pain in 17 previously untreated men with metastatic PC. Two of these patients remained in complete remission with no manifestation of disease after 30 months of treatment.4 Muscato et al reported on 21 patients treated with HDK and HC that were considered to be hormone-refractory. Seven of 21 patients, or 33%, had a greater than 90% fall in PSA with six of these seven maintaining remissions lasting greater than 12 months (range 14-35+ months).5 In a 1997 paper, Small et al reported the results of HDK + HC therapy in men with progressive disease after ADT and after anti-androgen withdrawal. Of 48 evaluable patients, 30 (62%) had a PSA decrease of greater than 50% for at least eight weeks while 23 of these (48%) had a decrease in PSA of greater than 80% also maintained for at least eight weeks. The PSA dropped to 0.3 ng/ml or less in five patients for 3+, 4+, 5+, 7+ and 10+ months. These same Results Using HDK + HC in five patients had PSA values of 22, 47, 15, 488 Patients with PC and 6.7 ng/ml, respectively prior to initiating Published clinical trials of HDK involved studies HDK + HC. For all 48 of these patients, the median PSA decrease was 79% (range 0Figure 1. Testosterone decline 99%). The median duration of after HDK administration. 600 562 response was 3.5 months with 23 of Testosterone Level 500 the 48 patients having ongoing % Reduction 400 351 responses (range 3.2+ months to 330 300 12.3+ months). No difference was 201 180 200 136 seen in response rates despite the pres75.8 53 90.5 67.9 64.2 100 58.7 37.5 ence or absence of an anti-androgen 0 0 0.5 2 4 6 25 48 withdrawal response (AAWR). The Hour of treatment median survival of all patients had not been reached at 6+ months.6 3 Testosterone ng/dl Ketoconazole, the generic name for Nizoral®, is a synthetic antifungal agent used to treat fungal infections since the 1970s. When given at traditional doses of 200400mg/day to treat fungal infections, it was noted to temporarily decrease testosterone and adrenal androgen levels. Higher doses (8001200mg/day) produced a longer hormone blockade with bound and free testosterone equally decreased. The concentration of ketoconazole appeared to be the reason for the more complete blockade.1 Figure 2. Effect of ketoconazole on DU-145 and PC-3 androgen-independent cell lines.2 250 Mean Colony Number Overview 204 200 200 138 150 100 50 0 PC-3 DU-145 84 47 45 31 Untreated 0.1 24 15 12 8 5 1.0 2.5 5 10 Ketoconazole Concentration ug/ml 3 0 0 50 In another 1997 abstract, Small et al described a treatment of 20 patients with simultaneous AAW and HDK + HC. Fourteen of these patients (70%) had a greater than 70% drop in their serum PSA level, and in 10 patients (50%) the decline in PSA level was greater than 80% compared to baseline levels. Six of the 10 were still responding after 2+ to 9+ months.7 (continued on page 4) High-dose Ketoconazole Plus Hydrocortisone (HDK+ HC) PCRI co-founders Scholz and Strum conducted a 60-patient study that concluded that “prolonged response with ketoconazole is far more common in HRPC patients if treatment is initiated before the baseline PSA (bPSA) rises above 10.” The results showed that patients with a bPSA of less than or equal to 10 had a median duration of response (MDR) of 25 months. Patients with a bPSA of greater than 10 had an MDR of only four months.8 Decrease in bone pain has frequently been reported with HDK therapy. In 1984, Trachtenberg published his findings of 13 patients who completed at least 6 months of treatment with HDK 400mg every 8 hours. HDK greatly reduced the need for analgesics, serum prostatic acid phosphatase levels dropped to normal and testosterone levels were reduced. The side effects in this group were reported as limited.9 In 1988, 22 Stage D2 patients were followed at MD Anderson Hospital in Houston. In spite of previous androgen deprivation therapy, 16 of the 22 patients reported pain as a significant part of their clinical picture prior to HDK. Of these patients, 13 (81%) noted improvement in bone pain for 1-8 months (mean three months). Subjective improvement in bone pain was also reported by others using HDK in hormone refractory PC patients.10 Since bone pain can affect quality of life, a trial of HDK with HC may be appropriate if bone pain is a part of the clinical picture for those whose PC has progressed while on ADT. High-Dose (e.g. 400 mg, three times a day) ketoconazole is not the only approach. In 2002, Harris et al published a study with LDK (LowDose Ketoconazole) that included 28 patients with progressive prostate cancer despite castrate levels of testosterone and ongoing testicular androgen suppression. Treatment consisted of low dose ketoconazole (200 mg. three times daily) and oral replacement doses of hydrocortisone (20 mg. every morning and 10 mg. at bedtime). Thirteen (46%) of the 28 patients had a PSA decrease of more than 50%. The authors concluded: “The regimen of low dose ketoconazole with replacement doses of hydrocortisone is well tolerated and has moderate activity in patients with progressive androgen independent prostate cancer.”11 This continued from page 3 treatment may be a reasonable option for those who cannot tolerate larger doses of ketoconazole, i.e. HDK, but who may benefit from a secondary hormonal manipulation. LDK is certainly of interest for further investigation. Administration Guidelines for HDK + HC HDK is initially prescribed at a dose of 200 mg three times a day for one week, then the dose is increased to 400 mg (two tablets) three times a day thereafter. HC is normally prescribed at a dose of 20 mg with breakfast and 10 or 20 mg with dinner. HC should be taken with food. If symptoms suggest HC excess (ankle swelling or diabetes in poor control), the dose may need to be decreased. NOTE: Do not abruptly discontinue HC. Always discontinue HC by tapering the dose with the guidance of your physician. This may take several weeks. Unlike HC, HDK should be taken on an empty stomach (30-60 minutes before or at least two hours after food) because HDK requires acidity for dissolution. Stomach acid is needed to enhance HDK absorption (bioavailability) so PC patients take HDK on an empty stomach so that food there will not act as a buffer and interfere with the absorption of HDK. Moreover, histamine 2 (H-2) receptor antagonists (e.g. Zantac, Tagamet, Pepcid, Axid) decrease HDK absorption by 75%. Proton-pump inhibitors (Prilosec, Prevacid, Nexium) reduce acid even more. Antacids and Carafate will also interfere with HDK bioavailability. Many other drugs have the potential to interfere with the absorption of HDK by their anticholinergic side effects that decrease stomach acid (see list below). If a patient has a medical condition requiring him to lower his stomach acid, taking HDK with Coca Cola or Pepsi (Diet OK), lemonade, orange juice, or 1000 mg Vitamin C is a reasonable option to increase absorption of HDK. Like many medical oncologists using HDK, Dr. Snuffy Myers does not recommend grapefruit juice be used in this setting. Grapefruit juice does not effectively acidify the stomach, and its impact on ketoconazole has not been documented and may lead to an accumulation of HDK resulting in toxic drug levels.12 A recent study done in patients who were taking acidreducing drugs showed a 50% increase in ketoconazole bioavailability when it was taken along with a carbonated beverage.13 It should also be kept in mind that as people age, they may produce less stomach acid. This could have an impact on HDK absorption. Therefore, adding 500 mg of asorbic acid may be wise to avoid this concern. Check with your physician. Monitoring Nizoral Blood Levels HDK bioavailability (serum Nizoral or ketoconazole levels) can be monitored by a commercially available blood test. Our ability to assess this biological marker makes HDK therapy unique. Since there are many variables associated with absorption of HDK, a laboratory test of this nature is invaluable. Pont et al14 and Heyns et al15 reported on the value of serum HDK monitoring and their correlation with lowering androgen levels and clinical response. Some oncologists have long recommended a ketoconazole blood level of at least 4.0, which should be tested at four hours past the morning dose.16 They also recommend that patients wait at least three weeks after initiating HDK+HC therapy to ensure that the drug has obtained full strength in the blood stream. This theory is reinforced by the works of Eichenberger17 and Witjes in 1989.18 Drugs have the potential to interfere with the absorption of HDK. These include, but are not limited to the following (check with your physician): Artane (trihexyphenidyl) Cystospaz (hyoscyamine) Lomotil (has atropine) Atrovent (ipratropium) Ditropan (oxybutynin) Pro-Banthine (propantheline) Beelith (has magnesium) Donnatal (has belladonna) Robinul (glycopyrrolate) Bellergal (has belladonna) Levsin (hyoscyamine) Transderm-V (scopolamine) Bentyl (dicyclomine) Urised (has hyoscyamine) 4 Levsinex (has hyoscyamine) High-dose Ketoconazole Plus Hydrocortisone (HDK+ HC) It is therefore suggested that after a patient has been on HDK for three weeks or more, a Nizoral blood level be obtained at four hours after the morning dose of HDK. The PCRI Helpline staff may be able to assist callers in locating a laboratory that offers this testing. continued from page 4 ed to unhealthy and even dangerous levels. Any risk factor for elevated LFTs such as a history of hepatitis or a regimen of other liver-affecting medications should be taken into consideration when using HDK. Patients on HDK should have liver function tests checked monthly. Table 1 indicates that skin toxicity is a sigSide Effects nificant side effect in two of the studies, The most common side effects are weakalthough a search of the literature does not ness or lack of strength, gastrointestinal indicate it to be as common as one would complaints such as nausea or vomiting, livexpect based on this data. Acquired cutaneous er toxicity, skin reactions, and a potential adherence, or Sticky Skin Syndrome seldom risk from adrenal suppression. causes sufficient discomfort for therapy to be It is important to emphasize that any nauwithdrawn.20 However, Sticky Skin Syndrome sea or loss of appetite a patient may experience can cause painful physical discomfort in after initiating HDK + HC usually improves patients using HDK and has been described as over time. It is inadvisable for patients on HDK sitting on a vinyl chair on a hot day while to self-medicate with acid-blocking medicawearing shorts. It can also result in an uncomtions, antacids, or other over-the-counter (nonfortable adhesion of thighs or under arms. prescription) items without consulting a physiSmall et al report that the principal side cian. Because stomach acid is necessary effects of HDK are related to gastric irritation for absorption of HDK, use of antacids leading to nausea and anorexia in at least 10% will limit HDK’s effectiveness. of patients. These side effects are due to mild Table 1 lists reported side effects from adrenal insufficiency caused by such high-doses HDK+HC therapy found in peer-reviewed literaof HDK. Cortisol, a specific type of steroid called ture. They are displayed in order from most comglucocorticoid, regulates glucose and one’s abilmon to least common. ity to deal with stress and is essential for life. Mild Of all the side effects, liver damage may be loss of cortisol production results in fatigue and the greatest concern. As HDK is being reevaluatnausea. Cortisol is produced in a diurnal pattern ed for treatment of PC, it has become clearer that with peaks in the early morning hours gradualliver function test (LFT) abnormalities are mild ly dropping through the day to lower levels. to moderate and in most cases return to normal When stress increases such as with illness, without intervention. In some patients, howinjury, or surgery, and cortisol is blocked by HDK, ever, liver function tests can become elevatone can go into shock and die. LifeTable 1. threatening cortisol deficiency is Side Effects From HDK+HC Treatment uncommon for men using HDK for Polson Small Small PC, but mild adrenal cortisol defi199519 19977 19976 ciency is common. The use of Patients in Study 39 20 50 hydrocortisone appears to diminish Skin toxicity 29% these side effects and may even (Sticky skin only) enhance HDK’s ability to reduce Skin toxicity 20% testosterone for steroids have long (Sticky skin, easy bruising, been known to have androgen dryness) deprivation properties and are often Elevated liver enzymes 10% 4% employed in the treatment of PC. Nausea/vomiting 15% 10% It has been suggested by some Gynecomastia (Breast 15% that those taking HDK with HC carenlargement and tenderness) ry an ID card or Medic Alert bracelet Fatigue 10% 6% indicating the possible need for supEdema 6% plementary doses of HC during periRash 4% ods of stress. Ask your pharmacist or Anorexia 2% doctor how to obtain this card. 5 Intolerance of HDK side effects such as nausea, fatigue or abnormal liver function tests are the most common reasons patients stop this treatment. Fortunately, AG combined with hydrocortisone is rarely associated with nausea or liver function abnormalities, and it can be effectively substituted for HDK in some patients. Drug Interactions and Precautions Note: the following is not an all-inclusive list of all drugs that may interact with HDK. Make sure that the administering physician has a complete list of your current medications and supplements. Also, check a current version of the Physician’s Desk Reference (PDR) for personal validation. HDK should not be taken with Antihistamines: Seldane (terfenadine), Claritin (loratadine) and Hismanal (astemizole). (Although Hismanal has been withdrawn from the U.S. market, patients may still have access to it.): HDK significantly increases the blood levels of these drugs, which can potentially cause serious cardiovascular side effects. Oral anti-diabetic medications: Diabinese (chlorpropamide), Glucotrol (glipizide), DiaBeta, Glynase or Micronase (glyburide), Glucophage (metformin) and Tolinase (tolbutamide): HDK may increase the blood sugar-lowering effects of these drugs and result in severe hypoglycemia. Other types of medications: Propulsid (cisapride): Propulsid is a medication that promotes gastrointestinal tract motor activity. When given with HDK, Propulsid may cause lethal cardiac rhythms. Although Propulsid is no longer generally available in the U.S., patients may still have access to it. WARNING: HDK should not be taken with alcohol! Concurrent HDK and alcohol-containing beverages may cause an “Antabuse reaction” (skin flushing, rash, swollen legs, nausea, vomiting and headache). Drugs that may need dose changes if HDK is taken concurrently Anticoagulants (blood thinners): e.g. Coumadin (warfarin): HDK increases the blood-thinning effect of Coumadin which may (continued on page 11) The Linkage Between Obesity and Prostate Cancer Introduction There are a number of plausible biological mechanisms whereby obesity could promote the development and progression of cancer.1 The evidence for a connection between obesity and common forms of cancer is drawn from studies of populations, animal experiments, and limited clinical research on humans. However, this research largely provides biological proof of principle. With the exception of non-melanoma skin cancers, where a low fat diet led to a reduced incidence of tumors and modest weight loss,2 there are no definitive large-scale clinical intervention studies demonstrating that weight loss or dietary changes reduce the incidence of cancer. Nonetheless, there is a broad base of evidence that is sufficient to warrant advising cancer survivors to follow current dietary advice to achieve and maintain a healthy body weight by increasing the amount of fruits, vegetables, and whole grains in the diet while reducing fats. The balance of this article presents an overview of this evidence. Statistical Evidence There is a worldwide epidemic of common forms of cancer including prostate cancer in those countries and socioeconomic groups within countries eating a so-called Western Diet. This chaotic “diet” is characterized by a dietary pattern rich in fat, sugar, and red meat, but poor in fiber, fruits and vegetables.3 Since age is the primary risk factor for cancer, all such associations are based on age-adjusted incidences that can be up to five times higher in so-called high risk countries (e.g. U.S.) compared to low risk countries (e.g. Japan). Moreover, individuals migrating from low risk to high-risk countries increase their risk of cancer substantially within a single generation.4 Obesity is also associated with a number of common forms of cancer.5 These data have implicated environmental and lifestyle factors including diet in the etiology of cancer. There is also evidence that obesity is associated with an increased rate of progression of cancer following initial treatment.6 There is an ever-increasing population of cancer survivors and an increasing incidence of obesity. If patients with diagnosed cancer who have survived initial treatment are treated for obesity, it may improve outcomes and increase median survival. Even if these efforts had no effect on any remaining *Paracrine is a form of signaling in which the target cell is close to the signal-releasing cell. cancer cells, treating cancer survivors for obesity improves their quality of life and reduces the risk of other chronic diseases including heart disease and diabetes. Common Biological Processes Obesity, characterized by excess fatty tissue, has been shown to increase the risk for development of several common cancers. There are a number of biological processes common to these two conditions that could lead to a causal interrelationship. Many hormones involved in obesity also play a role in the initiation and promotion of cancer both at a cellular, paracrine*, and systemic level.7 In developed countries, the most common forms of cancer (including lung cancer, breast cancer, prostate cancer, pancreatic cancer, ovarian cancer, uterine cancer, kidney cancer and gallbladder cancer) are epithelial cell cancers. And interactions between epithelial and stromal components within the tissue (as well as hormones reaching the organ via the circulation) may play a role in stimulating tumor development and growth. There are at least four different mechanisms by which increased hormone secretion may promote cancer development. First, obesity leads to increased production of growth-promoting steroid hormones that can bind to nuclear receptors in hormone-dependent tumor cells. For example, estrogens8 are produced in excess amounts through aromatization of adrenal androgens by adipose stromal tissues in peripheral fat tissues. Second, free hormone levels can be affected by hormone-hormone interactions as in the case where upper body obesity is associated with reduced Sex Hormone Binding Globulin levels leading to increased free levels of circulating estrogens and testosterone.9 Third, steroid hormone action can trigger increased oxidant-stress-promoting cell proliferation and DNA damage.10 Androgens have been demonstrated to increase oxidant stress in prostate cancer cells, and oxidant defense mechanisms have been shown to be impaired early in the cancer process. Finally, obesity can increase the production of paracrine factors and hormones which stimulate the production of steroid hormones in cancer tissue through interactions between stromal and epithelial compartments in tissues. Many of these paracrine factors are cytokines produced by both fat cells and white blood cells. Obesity is associated with increased circulating levels of cytokines, and these levels are reduced with weight loss.11 The fat cell, which is the source of many of these so-called adipocytokines (see Figure 1), may play a significant role in the ability of fat tissue to preserve immune resistance to infections. It has long been recognized that malnutrition is associated with multiple impairments of immune function including impaired T-helper cell function. Hence, the ability of fat to store calories provides a separate important function to protect immune defenses.12 Today, cancer and heart disease are replacing infectious diseases as the primary cause of death, as obesity becomes more common in developing countries. It is possible that the increased cytokine secretion observed in obesity is simultaneously having a beneficial Figure 1. Adipocytokines and Other Fat Cell Products. Cholesterol Transfer Protein (CETP) Phosholipid Transfer Protein (PLTP) Lactate Prostaglandin Angiotensinogen Leptin Prostacyclin Adiponectin Monobutyrin Galectin-12 Free Fatty Acids TNF-= Plasminogen Activator Inhibitor (PAI-1) Adipsin (ASP) IL-6 Lipoprotein Lipase (LPL) 6 (complement (3a;D) David Heber, MD, PhD, FACP, FACN, Professor of Medicine and Director, UCLA Center for Human Nutrition effect on infectious disease resistance while at the same time increasing the risk of cancer. Information Specific to Prostate Cancer The diagnosis of prostate cancer has improved in recent years due to the development of the PSA test, which detects prostate cancer before it is physically palpable as a mass on rectal examination.13 Approximately 180,000 American men were diagnosed with prostate cancer in 2000.14 Prostate cancer develops as a result of both inherited and environmental factors. It is associated with aging, and it occurs in a latent or clinically inactive form in 30% to 40% of men by age 30 to 50 years and in 75% of men by age 80.15,16 Because latent or clinically inactive cancers were not as effectively diagnosed prior to the development of the PSA test, some uncertainty exists in predicting the behavior of prostate cancer after diagnosis. The cause of this disease is not fully understood, but a family history, the effects of androgens (like testosterone) and other hormones, and environmental and dietary factors may all be involved. The international variations in the rates of prostate cancer are considerable. (See Figure 2.) The county of Qidong in China has the lowest recorded incidence rate, 0.5 per 100,000 men. By comparison, Sweden has a rate of 55.3 per 100,000 men and the U.S. has a rate of 102.1 per 100,000 men.17 Of course, diagnosing silent cancer by blood PSA increases the statistical incidence of the disease because more clinically silent cancers are diagnosed. Global differences in incidence are probably not due to inheritance. If individuals with the same inherited genes are raised in two different environments, the risk of prostate cancer is associated with the country in which they are raised.18 An American Cancer Society survey of 750,000 individuals demonstrated that being obese increased the risk of prostate cancer.19 Among the various nutritional factors examined, per capita total fat consumption correlates with increased prostate cancer incidence in cross-national studies. In a population-based case-control study of prostate cancer among blacks, whites and Asian-Americans in Los Angeles, San Francisco, Hawaii, Vancouver and Toronto, a positive statistically significant association of prostate cancer risk and total fat studies have found an association between prostate cancer and dietary fat; however, none has shown a negative correlation. Figure 2. Prostate cancer incidence around the world. United States 102.1 Latent vs. Clinically Active Prostate Cancer Sweden 55.3 China .5 (Qidong County) 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 Per 100,000 Men intake was found for all ethnic groups combined. This association was attributable to energy intake from saturated fats.20 In Japan, an increase in prostate cancer risk has been noted as the per capita intake of dietary fat has increased.21 In Hawaii, a correlation was found between saturated fat intake and prostate cancer incidence. A representative sample of over 4,000 adults at least 45 years of age from the five main ethnic groups in Hawaii were interviewed regarding their diet, and multiple regression analysis was used to assess the statistical relationship between ethnic-sex-specific dietary intakes and corresponding populationbased cancer incidence rates. Significant positive associations were found for prostate cancer with fat intake from saturated and animal sources, and for animal protein intake.22 In the U.S., counties with higher prostate cancer incidence have higher per capita fat intake.5 Using questionnaires that ask how often a particular food is normally eaten, scientists have found clues to the association of dietary fat with cancer. In a retrospective study by West et al23 and a prospective study by Giovannucci et al,24 the more aggressive prostate cancers in patients were significantly correlated with high fat intake. In the Giovannucci study, those individuals eating the highest amount of meat had a risk of developing prostate cancer 2.64 times that of those eating the least. The course of prostate cancer may also be affected by fat intake. Kolonel et al25 found a significant relationship between dietary fat and prostate cancer mortality in Hawaiian men 70 years and older. In addition, several studies have demonstrated a positive association between saturated fat intake from meat and dairy products and prostate cancer.26-31 Other factors in the diet may enhance or diminish the risk for prostate cancer. Several retrospective and prospective 7 Approximately 60% of all men have latent or clinically silent prostate cancer, and the incidence of this latent form is the same in the United States and Japan.32 These estimates are based on autopsies of men who die for reasons other than prostate cancer. At the same time, clinically significant prostate cancer is much more common in the United States than in Japan. When Japanese men migrate to the United States, their incidence of clinically detected prostate cancer rises within one generation. These facts suggest that nutrition and lifestyle practices in lower-risk countries suppress the growth of prostate cancer so that it remains small and confined and is rarely diagnosed clinically. The Effects of Aging Prostate cancer is a disease associated with aging and obesity. It has been said that if you live long enough you will have prostate cancer, and over 90 percent of men over the age of 90 have detectable carcinomas in prostatic tissue. Men who have premature accidental deaths are found to have precancerous lesions such as prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN) in their prostate glands if they are between 40 and 60 years of age. Above 60 years of age, foci of prostatic cancer are found in addition to PIN lesions. Also commonly associated with increasing age is a shift in the pro-oxidant-anti-oxidant balance of many tissues toward a more oxidative state. Recently, foci of proliferative inflammatory atrophy (PIA) have been found in prostatic cancer biopsy specimens. While the DNA in PIN and cancerous lesions have multiple abnormalities, the DNA in the PIA lesions is normal. Given the common occurrence of prostatitis, both clinical and sub-clinical, it has been hypothesized that the prostate gland with aging undergoes repeated inflammation leading to DNA damage, mutation, and ultimately the formation of precancerous and cancerous lesions. African-American men have a significantly higher incidence of prostatic cancer compared to Caucasian men and have higher levels of IGF-1 and androgens at puberty. It has been proposed (continued on page 10) Treatment Options for Post-Prostatectomy Incontinence Loss of bladder control (urinary incontinence) after prostate surgery is a devastating complication, which has a significant negative impact on quality of life. When urinary incontinence persists after radical prostatectomy, appropriate bladder testing called urodynamics can evaluate the function of the bladder and sphincter (valve) muscle to determine the exact cause of the postprostectomy incontinence (ppi). Normally, as the bladder fills to capacity, there is very little change in bladder pressure and the sphincter remains closed allowing the man to stay dry. When incontinence occurs following prostatectomy, this normal balance of bladder and sphincter function is disturbed. Our research1 has defined three main causes of ppi based upon urodynamic findings in men with ppi: 1. High pressure (with �spasms’ of the bladder) developing in the bladder as the bladder fills (50% of men with ppi). These bladder spasms may cause urge incontinence, frequent urination, and sometimes loss of urine at night. 2. Damage to the sphincter muscle (35% of men with ppi). This damage results in stress incontinence with loss of urine during coughing, straining, or vigorous physical activity. 3. A combination of bladder malfunction and sphincter damage (10% of men with ppi). Men with this combined problem usually experience “mixed incontinence” symptoms with a combination of both urge and stress incontinence. With treatment directed by the urodynamic testing, the majority of men are able to experience significant improvement in their urinary control. When the main problem is high bladder pressures, medications to relax the bladder are usually effective. These medicines (generally known as anti-cholinergics) include Ditropan XL, Detrol LA, the Oxytrol patch, and imipramine. Both Ditropan and Detrol are oral medications that are taken once daily. These medications use a �time release’ mechanism to maintain adequate blood levels of the drug to relax the bladder and eliminate �bladder spasms’ over 24 hours. Side effects of these medications include dry mouth, constipation, and sometimes blurry vision. These drugs should not be used in patients with narrow angle glaucoma or in men who do not empty their bladder well. The Oxytrol patch sends the medication to relax the bladder through the skin. This patch is changed twice per week and may have fewer side effects than the oral medications. Interstim “Bladder Pacemaker” When the usual medical treatments to lower high bladder pressures are not successful, the Interstim “bladder pacemaker” may be an excellent alternative. This treatment involves a two-stage approach with both stages performed under local anesthesia as an outpatient procedure. The first stage involves placing a special stimulation electrode next to the main nerve that controls the bladder. The patient then wears an external stimulation box for 7-10 days as a “test stimulation” to evaluate the response of the bladder to the electrical stimulation to “relax” the bladder. When a good response is obtained, we proceed with the second stage of the procedure, which involves implantation of an internal �pacemaker’ that is attached to the stimulation electrode and programmed through the skin. Overall approximately 50% of patients respond to the first stage trial of test stimulation. When we proceed with the second stage implant, about 85% of patients have an excellent response. Thus, use of the Interstim “bladder pacemaker” is an effective treatment option for those patients who have high-pressure bladder dysfunction who do not respond to the usual forms of medical treatment. Options for treatment of sphincter damage include biofeedback, injection therapy (which is generally not successful), the artificial urinary sphincter, and more recently the male sling procedure. Those men with “mixed” bladder and sphincter malfunction will undergo initial treatment to improve their bladder function (i.e. lower their bladder pressures) followed by treatment to address the weak sphincter. The Artificial Urinary Sphincter (AUS) Perfected over the last 20 years, the artificial urinary sphincter is a device implanted into the body to correct stress incontinence in men with significant sphincter damage. The AUS has three components: a cuff that helps close the 8 urethra, a pump placed inside the scrotum, and a pressure regulating balloon which is placed in the lower abdomen (see Figure 1). When the man wants to urinate, he squeezes the pump in the scrotum, which opens the cuff around the urethra. Automatically, after 3-5 minutes, the fluid returns into the cuff allowing the cuff to close. After the device is tested during surgery, the cuff is “locked” open, and is only activated when swelling around the pump is gone (usually about 4-6 weeks after surgery). Figure 1. Artificial Urinary Sphincter in place. With the current model of the AUS, longterm patient satisfaction has been excellent with less that a 15% mechanical malfunction rate at 7.5 years after implantation of the device.2 Despite these excellent long-term results, however, some men are hesitant to have this prosthetic device placed. For these men, as well as for those with more minor degrees of ppi or for men who do not have the manual dexterity to squeeze the pump in the scrotum, the male sling is a promising alternative. Male Sling Procedure Over the last two years, the male sling procedure has become a viable treatment alternative for men with ppi due to sphincter damage causing stress incontinence. The surgical procedure to implant the sling takes about one hour and can be done either on an outpatient basis or with an overnight hospital stay. The purpose of the “sling” is to compress the urethra and help eliminate loss of urine with coughing, sneezing, or vigorous activity. Gary E. Leach, MD, Director, Tower Urology Institute for Continence, Los Angeles Figure 2. Placement location for six bone screws that secure the male sling in position. The sling is placed via an incision between the scrotum and rectum. After exposing the pelvic bone on each side, six titanium bone screws are placed into the pubic bone (three screws on each side). A permanent suture is attached to each bone screw (see Figure 2). These sutures are then passed through the material used to create the sling, which will compress the urethra. The material used for the sling may be cadaveric tissue, processed non-human tissues, or synthetic materials. The author prefers to use commercially available nonfrozen cadaveric fascia lata. Three sutures on one side are passed through one edge of the sling and tightly tied. The three sutures on the other side of the pubic bone are then passed through the sling and tied to create closure of the urethra at a pressure of 60cm water pressure. This pressure is confirmed by running sterile fluid backward into the urethra at 60cm water pressure and confirming that this fluid perfusion stops when the sling is tightened down (see Figure 3). The incision is then closed. A catheter is usually left in place for 24 hours with most men being able to urinate with good control immediately after the catheter is removed. Thus far, the results with the male sling have been encouraging. In one series of men undergoing the male sling, 40% of men are completely dry, 40% are significantly improved, and 20% are considered failures. Of those men who did not respond to the male sling, an artificial urinary sphincter could be considered as a second alternative. Summary Recent advances in the evaluation and treatment of men with incontinence following prostate surgery have allowed many men to regain their urinary control and improve their quality of life. The male sling is a significant advance in how we treat ppi. In well-selected candidates, the male sling is an effective treatment option for many men. ❏ References 1. Leach G, Trockman B, Wong A, et al: Post-prostatectomy incontinence: urodynamic findings and treatment outcomes. J. Urology 155:1256, 1996. 2. Haab F, Trockman B, Zimmern P, and Leach G: Quality of life and continence assessment of the artificial urinary sphincter in men with minimum 3.5 years of followup. J. Urology 158:435-439, 1997. Illustrations provided courtesy of American Medical Systems, Inc. Figure 3. Male sling in position compressing the urethra. HDK continued from page 11 11. Harris KA, et al: Low dose ketoconazole with replacement doses of hydrocortisone in patients with progressive androgen independent prostate cancer. J Urol;168(2):542-5 Aug 2002. 12. Myers CE: Ketoconazole (Nizorol). Prostate Forum 6-4:1-4, April 2001. 13. Chin T, et al: Ketoconazole “goes better with coke”. Mycology Observer 12:5 1994. 14. Pont A, Graybill JR, Craven PC, et al: High-dose ketoconazole therapy and adrenal and testicular function in humans. Arch Intern Med 144:2150-3, 1984. 15. Heyns W, Drochmans A, van der Schueren E, et al: Endocrine effects of high-dose ketoconazole therapy in advanced prostatic cancer. Acta Endocrinol 110:276-83, 1985. 16. Strum SB: High dose ketoconazole is effective against androgen-dependent and androgen –independent prostate cancer and is synergistic with chemotherapy. PCRI Insights 4-3:7; Aug 2001. 17. Eichenberger T, Trachtenberg J, Chronis P, et al:Synergistic effect of kenoconazole and anti-neoplastic agents in hormone-independent prostatic cancer cells. Clin Invest Med;12(6): 363-6, Dec 1989. 18. Witjeset al. Ketoconazole high dose is management of hormonally treated patients with progressive metastatic prostate cancer. Urology 33: 411-15: 1989. 19. Polsen JA, Cohen PR, Sella: Acquired cutaneous adherence in patients with androgen-independent prostate cancer receiving ketoconazole and doxorubicin: medication-induced sticky skin. J Am Acad Dermatol: 32 (4):571-5 1995. 20. Ketoconazole in advanced prostate cancer: have tolerability concerns been overstated? Drug and Their Perspect 15 (4): 11-13, 2000 © 2000 Adis International Limited. 21. Wang YG, Yu CF, Chen LC, et al. Ketoconazole potentiates terfenadineinduced apoptosis in human Hep G2 cells through the inhibition of cytochrome p450 3A4 activity. J Cell Biochem 87(2):147-59; 2002. 22. Chen TC, Holick MF. Vitamin D and prostate cancer prevention and treatment. Trends Endocrinol Metab. 2003 Nov; 14(9):423-30. 23. Beer TM. Development of weekly high-dose calcitriol based therapy for prostate cancer. Urol Oncol. 2003 Sep-Oct;21(5):399-405. How to Contribute to If you would like more information or if you have a question, contact Dr. Gary Leach at: Email: [email protected] Phone 310-854-9898 / Fax 310-854-6993 www.towerincontinence.com PCRI You can help PCRI continue its mission of providing the latest information and education about prostate cancer through programs, such as this newsletter, in the following ways: • Direct Donation: cash, check, or credit card; stock or real estate • Memorial and Gift in Honor Contributions: Honoring someone you care about with a memorial or commemorative gift • Planned Giving: Naming PCRI in your will or as beneficiary of a life insurance policy. Your tax-deductible gift in the form of cash, stocks or real estate should be made payable to PCRI and mailed to: Prostate Cancer Research Institute (PCRI) 5777 W. Century Blvd., Suite 800, Los Angeles, CA 90045 Federal Tax ID Number: 95-4617875 Credit card donations can be made online at: www.pcri.org. For further information, please contact PCRI at (310) 743-2116, or by e-mail at: [email protected]. Prostate Cancer Research Institute is a non-profit corporation, exempt from federal income taxes under section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code. It has been classified as an organization that is not a private foundation as defined in section 509(a) of the Code, and qualifies for a maximum charitable contribution by individual donors. 9 The Linkage Between Obesity and Prostate Cancer that androgen exposure, which has long been associated with the development of prostate cancer, may be a means by which the pro-oxidantanti-oxidant balance of prostate cells is altered. In rats, prostatic cancer can be induced by prolonged administration of testosterone. The ablation of androgens has formed the basis for first-line therapy of metastatic prostate cancer. It has also been proposed that hormones play a role in the progression of prostate cancer from silent to clinically significant forms. Since diet can influence circulating sex steroid hormones, diet and androgens may alter prostate cancer biology via common pathways. Urinary levels of androgens and estrogens were decreased in a group of Caucasian and African American men fed a diet in which fat content was reduced from 40% to 30% of total calories.33 A very low-fat, high-fiber diet has been shown to reduce sex steroid levels in a .group of normal men34 Therefore, changes in sex hormones may mediate in part the effects of diet on prostate cancer growth. As sedentary men age, they often experience an increase in fat mass, a decrease in lean body mass, and a change in hormone levels. These factors have been shown to increase the risk of prostate cancer. In a study of Seventh-Day Adventists, obesity was shown to significantly increase the risk of fatal prostate cancer compared with ideal weight.35 This association was also noted in the American Cancer Society's study of 750,000 individuals.5 With aging, the prevalence of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) increases; this is an androgen-dependent chronic disorder.36 Dihydrotestosterone (DHT) formed from testosterone in the prostate and in the testes appears to promote hyperplasia in humans, dogs and rats. Horton et al37 found increased levels of circulating DHT in elderly men compared with young men (89 ng/dl vs. 49 ng/dl); in this study, nearly all the elderly men had BPH. Since the prostate can convert testosterone to DHT, some have hypothesized that increased metabolic conversion of testosterone to DHT may account for the increased DHT levels in elderly men. Therefore, the effects of a high-fat diet on prostate cancer are partially explained by the changes in hormones resulting from that diet and by a decreasing lean body mass.38 continued from page 7 In prostate cancer cell lines exposed to physiological levels of 5 alpha-reductase dihydrotestosterone (DHT) and to the synthetic androgen R1881, proliferative responses and changes in oxidative stress were correlated.10 Physiologic levels of androgens are capable of increasing oxidative stress in androgenresponsive LNCaP prostate carcinoma cells. The evidence suggests that this result is due in part to increased mitochondrial activity. Androgens also alter intracellular glutathione levels and the activity of certain detoxification enzymes, such as gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase, that are important for maintenance of the cellular pro-oxidant-anti-oxidant balance. Conclusion Although there is no clinical trial data available to define the benefits of weight reduction, there is a clear association of obesity with cancer risk, incidence, or progression for a number of common forms of cancer. Evidence is much stronger for certain forms of cancer than others, but clearly, the endocrine and immune systems may play an important role in mediating the effects of increased adiposity on cancer risk based on the hormones and adipocytokines produced by fat cells. Many of the changes observed in these systems among obese patient are related but secondary phenomena of unknown significance, but others may be important in cancer development, promotion, or progression. Abnormalities in adipocytokine production and action are central to many of the observed metabolic changes in the obese patient, and may play a role in the cause and maintenance of the obese state as well as in associated forms of cancer. ❏ References 1. Heber D, Blackburn GL, Go VLW (eds). Nutritional Oncology. Academic Press, San Diego CA , 1999. 2. Jaax S, Scott LW, Wolf JE, Thornby JI, and Black HS. General guidelines for a low fat diet effective in the management of nonmelanoma skin cancer. Nutr. Cancer 1997; 27:150-156. 3. Armstrong B, Doll R. Environmental factors and cancer incidence and mortality in different countries, with special reference to dietary practices. Int. J. Cancer 1975; 15: 617-631. 4. Shimizu H, et al. Cancers of the prostate and breast among Japanese and white immigrants to Los Angeles County. Br. J. Cancer 1991; 63: 963-966. 5. Garfinkel L. Overweight and Cancer. Ann of Int Med. 1985; 103:1034-36. 6. Newman SC, Miller AB, and Howe GR A study of the effect of weight and dietary fat on breast cancer survival time. Am J Epidemiol 1986; 123: 767. 7. Heber D. The role of nutrition in cancer prevention and control. Oncology 1992;6: 9-14. 8. Nimrod A, Ryan KH: Aromatization of androgens by human abdominal and breast fat tissue. J Clin Endo Metab 1975;40:367. 9. Kissebah AH, Evans DJ, Peiris A, et al. Endocrine characteristics in regional obesities: Role of sex steroids. In Vague J, Bjorntorp P, Guy-Grand B et al 10 (eds). : Metabolic Complications of Human Obesities. Amsterdam, Excerpta Medica,1985, p. 115. 10. Ripple MO, Henry WF, Rago RP, Wilding G. Prooxidant-antioxidant shift induced by androgen treatment of human prostate carcinoma cells. J Natl Cancer Inst 1997; 89: 408. 11. Winkler G, Lakatos P, Salamon F, Nagy Z, Speer G, Kovacs M, Harmos G, Dworak O, Cseh K. Elevated serum TNF-alpha level as a link between endothelial dysfunction and insulin resistance in normotensive obese patients. Diabet Med 1999; 16:207-211. 12. Chandra RK. The nutrition-immunity-infection nexis: The enumeration and functional assessment of lymphocyte subsets in nutritional deficiency. Nutr Res 1983; 3:605-615. 13. Catalona WJ, Smith DS, Ratliff TL, Basler JW. Detection of organ-confined prostate cancer is increased through prostate-specific antigen-based screening. JAMA. 1993; 270:948-54. 14. Landis SH, Murray T, Bolden S, Wingo PA. Cancer Statistics, CA Cancer J Clin. 1998; 48:6-29. 15. Tanagho EA, McAninch JW, editors. 1995. Smith’s General Urology. Appleton and Lange, Norwalk, CT. 16. Thompson IM, Coltman CA, Brawley OW, Ryan A. Chemoprevention of prostate cancer. Semin Urol. 1995; 13:122-29. 17. Parkin DM, Whelan SL, Ferlay J, Raymond L, Young J, editors. 1997. Cancer Incidence in Five Continents, Volume VII. Scientific Publications #143. 18. Mandel JS, Schuman LM. Epidemiology of cancer of the prostate. Rev Cancer Epidemiol. 1980;1:1-65. 19. Lew EA, Garfinkel L. Variations in mortality by weight among 750,000 men and women. J Chron Dis. 1979; 32:563-76. 20. Whittemore AS, Kolonel LH, Wu AH, John EM, Gallagher RP, Howe GR, Burch JD, Hankin J, Dreon DM, West DW et al. Prostate cancer in relation to diet, physical activity and body size, in blacks, whites and Asians in the United States and Canada. J Nat Cancer Inst. 1995; 87:652-61. 21. Boyle P, Kevi R, Lucchuni F, LaVecchia C. Trends in diet-related cancers in Japan:A conundrum? Lancet. 1993; 349:752. 22. Kolonel LN, Hankin JH, Lee J, Chu SY, Nomura AMY, Hinds MW. Nutrient intakes in relation to cancer incidence in Hawaii. Br J Cancer. 1981; 44:332-39. 23. West DW, Slattery ML, Robison LM, French TK, Mahoney AW. Adult dietary intake and prostate cancer risk in Utah: A case-control study with special emphasis on aggressive tumors. Cancer Causes Control. 1991;2:85-94. 24. Giovannucci E, Rimm EB, Colditz GA, Stampfer MJ, Ascherio A et al. A prospective study of dietary fat and risk of prostate cancer. J Nat Cancer Inst 1993; 85:1571-79. 25. Kolonel LN, Yoshizawa CN, Hankin JN. Diet and prostatic cancer: A casecontrol study in Hawaii. Am J Epidemiol. 1988; 127:999-1012. 26. Mettlin C, Selenskas S, Natarajan N, Huben R. Beta-carotene and animal fats and their relationship to prostate cancer risk. Cancer. 1989; 64:605-12. 27. Snowdon DA, Phillips RL, Choi W. Diet, obesity and risk of fatal prostate cancer.Am J Epidemiol. 1984; 120:244-50. 28. Kaul L, Heshmat MY, Kovi J, Jackson MA, Jackson AG et al. The role of diet in prostate cancer. Nutr Cancer. 1987; 9:123-28. 29. Slattery ML, Schumacher MC, West DW, Robison LM, French TK. Food consumption trends between adolescent and adult years and subsequent risk of prostate cancer. Am J Clin Nutr. 1990; 52:752-57. 30. Ross RK, Shimizu H, Paganini-Hill A, Honda G. Case-control studies of prostate cancer in blacks and whites in Southern California. J Nat Cancer Inst.1987; 78:869-74. 31. Talamini R, LaVecchia C, Decarli A, Negri E, Franceschi S. Nutrition, social factors and prostatic cancer in a Northern Italian population. Br J Cancer. 1986;53:817-21. 32. Yatani R, Shiraishi T, Nakakuki K, Kusano I, Takanari H, Hayashi T. Trends in frequency of latent prostate carcinoma in Japan from 1965-1979 to 1982-1986. J Nat Cancer Inst. 1988; 80:683-87. 33. Hill P, Wynder EL, Garbaczewski L et al. Diet and urinary steroids in black and white North American men and black South African men. Cancer Res. 1987; 47:2982-85. 34. Dorgan JF, Judd JT, Longcope C, Brown C, Scatzkin A et al. Effects of dietary fat and fiber on plasma and urine estrogens in men: A controlled feeding study. Am J Clin Nutr. 1996; 64:850-55. 35. Mills PK, Beeson WL, Phillips RL, Fraser GE. Cohort study of diet, lifestyle and prostate cancer in Adventist men. Cancer. 1989; 64:598-604. 36. Geller J, Albert J. 1982. The effect of aging on the prostate. InEndocrine Aspects of Aging. (Korenman SG, ed.) Elsevier, New York, pp.137-61. 37. Horton R, Hsieh P, Barberia J, Pages L, Cosgrove M. Altered blood androgens in elderly men with prostatic hyperplasia. J Clin Endo Metab. 1975; 41:793-96. 38. Snowdon DA, Phillips RL, Choi W. Diet, obesity and risk of fatal prostate cancer. Am J Epidemiol. 1984;120:244-50. High-dose Ketoconazole Plus Hydrocortisone (HDK+ HC) continued from page 5 require a dosage reduction. Anti-epilepsy agents: Dilantin (phenytoin): Dilantin may affect the body’s ability to eliminate HDK and vice-versa, leading to blood level changes for both drugs that can lead to toxic symptoms. Anti-infective agents: Rifamate contains isoniazid and rifampin: HDK causes adverse changes (up or down) in the blood levels of isoniazid; Rimactane (Rifampin): significantly reduces the blood levels of kenoconazole. Editor: Review Board: Charles Bader Stanley A. Brosman, MD Mark Scholz, MD Publisher: Prostate Cancer Research Institute Design & Production: Diana Garnand Prostate Cancer Research Institute 5777 Century Boulevard, Suite 800 Los Angeles, CA 90045 Helpline: (310) 743-2110 Phone: (310) 743-2116 Fax: (310) 743-2113 E-mail: [email protected] Web sites: www.pcri.org www.prostate-cancer.org Executive Director: Glenn D. Weaver E-mail: [email protected] Board of Directors Chester A. Swenson, President Chairman, Marketing & Financial Services Enterprises Jerome Seliger, PhD, Vice President Professor of Health Administration, California State University, Northridge Barry L. Friedman, JD, Secretary Attorney at Law T. Kent Graham, Treasurer Financial Consultant, T. Kent Graham & Associates Duke K. Bahn, MD Prostate Institute of America Stanley A. Brosman, MD Pacific Urology Institute, Pacific Clinical Research Brian Gauthier Executive Vice President, St. Vincent Foundation Arthur Lurvey, MD Sleeping pills and tranquilizers: Halcion (triazolam) and Versed (midazolam): HDK significantly increases the blood levels of both drugs. Cholesterol-Lowering Agents: Statins: Lipitor (atrovastatin), Lovastatin (mevacor), Pravachol (pravastatin), Zocor (simvastatin), Baycol (cerivastatin – recalled 2001): HDK increases the amount of the statin in the blood and could lead to serious muscle disease so the dose of statin may need to be adjusted. Other types of medication: Medrol (methylprednisolone): HDK increases the blood levels of Medrol; Sandimmune (cyclosporine): Sandimmune may affect the body’s ability to eliminate HDK and vice-versa, leading to changes in the blood levels of both drugs. Chemotherapy Agents HDK is synergistic with some chemotherapy agents, such as adriamycin. However, HDK blocks the enzymes that clear Taxol, Taxotere, Emcyt, vincristine and vinblastine, among others. Specifically, HDK blocks the cytochrome P450-containing protein, CYP 3A4, which is the enzyme responsible for clearing 50% of all prescription drugs.21 Recent investigation indicates this activity may enhance various chemotherapy agents. For example, a chemotherapy drug is usually cleared in the liver by cytochrome P450 so the patient does not get the full strength of the dose he is taking. When HDK is used, P450 is inhibited so he gets the full strength of this medication. Clinical trials must be undertaken to prove this, but it does appear that HDK may play a role in chemotherapy treatment in the future. Each and every drug given to a patient on HDK needs to be very carefully evaluated. One must proceed with extreme caution when using ketoconazole with chemotherapy agents such as the taxanes. A dramatic dosage reduction of the chemotherapy (up to 80%) may be needed. Medicare Contractor Medical Director Vitamin D Jerry Peters Ketoconazole is an inhibitor of Vitamin D requiring P450 enzymes for metabolism so men on HDK may be at risk for a Vitamin D deficiency and bone mass loss. Monitoring serum calcitriol (the active form of Vitamin D) could alert one to the need for Vitamin D replacement. Besides bone loss concerns, there is additional significance of low Vitamin D for those with PC as low Vitamin D is thought to increase the risk and mortality from the disease.22 In the lab, the work of Thomasz Beer, MD at Oregon Health and Science Institute in Portland, Oregon has noted reduction of growth of prostate MCG Records Claudia B. Sangster, Esq. Director of Philanthropy Services, myCFO, Inc. Mark Scholz, MD PCRI Co-founder Prostate Oncology Specialists The cost of printing and mailing this newsletter is made possible through a generous grant from The Life Extension Foundation P.O. Box 229120, Hollywood, Florida 33022 800-544-4440 www.lef.org/prostate The opinions expressed in the by-lined articles are those of the authors and should not be considered opinions of the PCRI. © Copyright 2004. Printed on recycled paper. 11 cancer cells with Vitamin D. He has also done considerable work with Docetaxel and calcitriol in Androgen-Independent Prostate Cancer with promising results related to PC growth and few if any side effects related to Vitamin D.23 Therefore the addition of calcitriol to Nizoral would address the Vitamin D deficiency and may further reduce the PSA and slow the growth of the cancer. (Caution: When taking calcitriol, check with your physician regarding any calcium or Vitamin D supplements since you may need to discontinue these.) Conclusions HDK + HC is a very active regimen in the management of PC. With its broad spectrum of pharmacological activity, HDK is one of the most active agents used in the treatment of PC. Moreover, it can block the enzymatic degradation of multiple anti-cancer agents. What’s more, blood level monitoring can be used to evaluate absorption and hence the bioavailability of this anti-cancer agent. Because of these unique properties, HDK has great potential for the therapy of prostate cancer. However, the FDA has never approved the use of HDK for the treatment of PC, and many physicians are unaware of the efficacy of HDK or are afraid of its toxicity based on exaggerations of HDK’s effect on the liver. Certainly, physicians should consider the use of HDK for active therapy of PC and well-designed trials should be undertaken and/or completed to provide a better understanding of the pharmacology of antineoplastic agents. ❏ References 1. Pont A, Graybill JR, Craven PC, et al: High-Dose ketoconazole therapy and adrenal and testicular function in humans. Arch Intern Med 144(11):2150-3) Nov 1984 2. Eichenberger T, Trachtenberg J, Toor P, et al: Ketoconazole: a possible direct cytotoxic effect on prostate carcinoma cells. J Urol 141:190-1,1989. 3. Trachtenberg J, Halpern N, Pont A: Ketoconazole: a novel and rapid treatment for advanced prostate cancer. J Urol 30 (1):152-3, Jul 1983 4. Pont A, et al: Long-term experience with high dose ketoconazole therapy in patients with stage D2 prostatic carcinoma. J Urol 137:902-4,1987. 5. Muscato JJ, Ahmann TA, Johnson KM, et al: Optimal dosing of ketoconazole (Keto) and hydrocortisone (HC) leads to long responses in hormone refractory prostate cancer. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 13:229, 1994 (abstract). 6. Small EJ, et al: Ketoconazole retains activity in advanced prostate cancer patients with progression despite flutamide withdrawal. J Urol 157:1204-7, 1997. 7. Small EJ, et al: Simultaneous antiandrogen withdrawal and treatment with ketoconazole and hydrocortisone in patients with “advanced" prostate carcinoma. Cancer 80:1755-9, 1997. 8. Scholz M, Strum S, Mittleman P. High Dose Ketoconazole and hydrocortisone for hormone refractory prostate cancer (HRPC). Proc Amer Soc Clin Oncol: 19:370: 2000 9. Trachtenberg J, Pont A. Ketoconazole therapy for advanced prostate cancer. Lancet. 25(8400):433-5, Aug 1984 10. Jubelirer SJ, Hogan T. High dose Ketoconazole for the treatment of hormone refractory metastatic prostate carcinoma: 16 cases and review of the literature. J Urol 142(1):89-91, Jul 1989. (continued on page 9) PCRI Expands into Hawaii For several years, the PCRI has had offices on both coasts of the United States. Now the Institute has expanded overseas, opening an office on the island of Maui in the Hawaiian Islands. Manning the Helpline there is David Derris at 808-891-0209. David is well known to many attendees of PCRI national conferences, as he and his life partner, Eti Fuchs, have been invaluable volunteers at these conferences. A retired orthodontist, David has become well versed in prostate cancer since he, himself, was diagnosed with the disease in 1996. Faced with a shortage of prostate cancer specialists in the islands, he embarked on a program of selfempowerment, learn“My mission in ing all he could about bringing PCRI PC by reading and to Hawaii is to speaking with prostate cancer survivors on the deliver reliable mainland, and talking information so to such experts as men can make Drs. Fernand Labrie, truly informed Howard Scher, Stephen Strum, and Mark decisions” Scholz. In contrast to the gloomy predictions he had gotten from physicians on the islands, these and other mainland experts helped him steer a course of treatment away from invasive local therapies and eventually his diagnosis was changed from prostate cancer to atypical adenomatus prostate hyperplasia. Today, he continues a healthy prostate diet, supplements, exercise, and stress reduction, apparently free from PC. In the process of dealing with his prostate cancer scare, David decided to is published by: Prostate Cancer Research Institute 5777 W. Century Blvd., Suite 800 Los Angeles, CA 90045 Websites: www.prostate-cancer.org www.pcri.org do what he could for other men in the islands who were facing the threat of prostate cancer without readily available, reliable information. In 1997, he and two other prostate cancer patients founded the Maui chapter of US TOO!, and today he is very active on the PC scene. When asked how active, he replied: “I have been the prostate cancer chair of the Maui ACS chapter, giving talks on prostate health awareness and early detection of PC. I have put on 1/2-day prostate health symposiums and set up free PSA and DRE testing events on the Island. I have also traveled to the islands of Molokai and Lanai to present prostate education and explain early detection of prostate cancer programs. When speaking with newly diagnosed men, I regularly suggest they have their biopsy slides reread by a prostate pathologist before making any treatment decision. And, of course, I continue my self-education through such opportunities as the PCRI conferences. “In the islands we now have prostate cancer patient support groups on Oahu (Honolulu), the Big Island (Hawaii), Maui, and Kauai. On the state and local levels, the ACS chapters support the prostate support groups and sponsor statewide PC awareness and early detection programs. But the ACS and US TOO! chapters are just able to scratch the surface. We are still trying to find ways to reach larger numbers of men and especially those ethnic groups that are under-served by the health services. There are no doctors that I know of, anywhere in the islands, who specialize in treating just prostate cancer patients. “Without reliable information to guide them, men on the islands are too likely to put off being tested for PC, and when they are diagnosed with the disease, they may make critical treatment decisions before they understand the biology and extent of their tumor. My mission in bringing PCRI to Hawaii is to deliver reliable information so men can make truly informed decisions and thus do away with unnecessary pain and suffering caused by either the under-treatment or over-treatment of prostate cancer.” And that’s why the PCRI has expanded into this westernmost U.S. state. ❏ NONPROFIT ORG. U.S. POSTAGE PAID LIFE EXTENSION FOUNDATION
© Copyright 2024 Paperzz