UNIVERZITET “SV.KIRIL I
METODIJ”
FAKULTET ZA FIZI^KA KULTURA
IZVE[TAJ ZA SAMOEVALUACIJA
NA FAKULTETOT ZA FIZI^KA
KULTURA ZA PERIODOT OD
2007-2012
Skopje, 2012
2
S O D R @ I N A
1. VOVED ........................................................................................................................ 3
2. MISIJA NA FAKULTETOT ...................................................................................... 3
3.NASTAVNO-NAU^EN, SORABOTNI^KI I
ADMINISTRATIVEN KADAR ...................................................................................... 4
3.1. Nastavno-nau~en i sorabotni~ki kadar .............................................................. 4
3.2. Za Centarot za fizi~ko obrazovanie ................................................................. 5
3.3. Administrativen kadar ........................................................................................ 7
4. NASTAVNO-OBRAZOVNA DEJNOST ....................................................................... 8
4.1. Dodiplomski studii .............................................................................................. 8
4.1.1. Karakteristiki na studiskite programi ......................................................... 8
4.1.2. Struktura na studiskite programi ................................................................. 11
4.1.2.1. Studiska programa za predmetna nastava po fizi~ko
obrazovanie ili Prv ciklus akademski studii za
fizi~ko i zdravstveno obrazovanie ............................................................ 11
4.1.2.2. Studiska programa za sport ili
I ciklus stru~ni studii za sportski treneri ..............................................
12
4.1.2.3. Studiska programa za vi{e obrazovanie za sport .................................... 13
4.2. Postdiplomski studii......................................................................................... 14
4.3. Doktorski studii ................................................................................................. 15
5. PROSTORNI I MATERIJALNO-TEHNI^KI RESURSI ..................................... 15
5.1. Biblioteka ........................................................................................................... 17
5.2. Centar za fizi~ko obrazovanie ........................................................................ 17
5.3. Logistika .............................................................................................................. 17
6. STUDENTI ............................................................................................................... 18
6.1. Dodiplomski studii ............................................................................................ 18
6.1.1. Studentska anketa ............................................................................................ 19
6.1.1.1. Informiranost .......................................................................................... 19
6.1.1.2.
Prisustvo na nastava i rabota vo tek na semestarot ........................... 19
6.1.1.3.
Mislewe na studentite za predmetite
od studiskite programi od vtora godina ............................................... 19
6.1.1.4.
Potrebno vreme za u~ewe ......................................................................... 20
6.1.1.5.
Literatura ................................................................................................. 21
6.1.1.6.
Mislewe za nastavnicite ........................................................................ 22
6.1.1.7.
Mislewe za asistentite .......................................................................... 23
6.1.1.8.
Kolokviumi/testovi .................................................................................. 25
6.1.1.9.
Zavr{en ispit ........................................................................................... 25
6.1.1.10. Mobilnost na studentite ......................................................................... 27
6.2. Postdiplomski studii (magisterski i specijalisti~ki) ............................... 27
6.4. Nadvore{na sorabotka ........................................................................................ 28
6.5. Nau~no-istra`uva~ka dejnost ............................................................................ 28
7. FINANSII .............................................................................................................. 29
8. ZAKLU^OCI ............................................................................................................. 30
3
1. VOVED
Ovoj izve{taj sodr`i vnatre{na samoevaluacija, odnosno
ocenuvawe na rabotata na Fakuletot za fizi~ka kultura, nastavnonau~niot i stru~niot kadar i negovite studiski programi za periodot po
2007 godina, koga e usvoen posledniot Izve{aj za samoevaluacija.
Vo samoevaluacijata u~estvuva{e komisija koja so odluka na
Nastavno-nau~niot sovet na Fakultetot broj 0201-289/16 e formirana na
14.04.2011 godina. Komisijata ja so~inuvaa: red. prof. d-r Daniela
[ukova Stojmanovska - pretsedatel, red. prof. d-r Len~e Aleksovska
Veli~kovska - ~len, red. prof. Robert Hristovski d-r - ~len, red. prof.
d-r Vojo Nastevski - ~len, red. prof. d-r Orce Mitevski - ~len, student
Rumen Ampovski - ~len i student Filip Masevski - ~len.
Za potrebite na samoevaluacijata se zemeni predvid
sogleduvawata na nastavnicite, sorabotnicite, stru~niot kadar i
drugite vraboteni na Fakultetot. Osven toa be{e sprovedena i anketa na
studentite, za da se utvrdi i nivnoto mislewe vo vrska so
sproveduvaweto na nastavata, vidot na nastavnite sodr`ini i na~inot
na nivnoto prezentirawe, odnosot na nastavnicite i sorabotnicite kon
studentite, na~inot na sproveduvawe na ispitite i kolokviumite i
formiraweto na ocenkata.
Komisijata se sostana pove}e pati, a se so cel da se napravi
Izve{taj koj }e ja otslika vistinskata sostojba.
2. MISIJA NA FAKULTETOT
Glavnata misija na Fakultetot e sozdavawe na zdrava populacija
na deca i mladi koi namesto da zastranuvaat po nesakanite pati{ta
(narkomanija, pu{ewe, alkoholizam), }e gi naso~ime kon fizi~kata
aktivnost i sportot. Za da mo`e toa da se ostvari, potrebno e
Fakultetot da obrazuva kadri koi }e bidat stru~ni i koi so li~en
primer }e mo`at da im poka`at deka fizi~kata aktivnost i sportot
navistina zna~at zdravje, podobar kvalitet na `ivotot vo sekoja vozrast,
no i pomalku bolesti (ne samo na onie koi se povrzani so neaktivnost
(debelina, deformiteti i zaboluvawa na rbetniot stolb i stapalata),
tuku i namaluvawe na simptomite na nekoi drugi hroni~ni bolesti
({e}erna bolest, hipertenzija, revmatski zaboluvawa, osteoporoza i dr).
Za da ja ostvari ovaa misija, fakultetot treba da ja sproveduva
nastavata na postoe~kite dodiplomski (prv stepen) studii vo dvete
nasoki - fizi~ko i zdravstveno obrazovanie i stru~ni studii za sportski
treneri po razli~ni sportski disciplini, postdiplomski i doktorski
studii po kineziologija.
4
Druga misija na Fakultetot e da se bori za otvarawe i na novi
nasoki na Fakultetot, kako: kineziterapija, rekreacija, sportski
menaxment, sportsko pravo, sportsko novinarstvo, fizi~ko i zdravstveno
obrazovanie za predu~ili{na i oddelenska nastava, zdravje itn., a so
cel podetalno da se naso~i kon obu~uvaweto na kadri koi }e bidat
osposobeni da rabotat vo sekoja oblast oddelno. Taka }e se ovozmo`i
stru~nite kadri koi gi sozdava Fakultetot da po~nat da rabotat so
decata u{te od najrana vozrast, bidej}i tie mo`at da pridonesat vo
pravilniot razvoj na decata od najranata vozrast, pa se do najstarata
populacija. Pritoa, otkako decata }e gi steknat tie zdravi naviki,
sigurno e deka }e gi sproveduvaat i primenuvaat do krajot na `ivotot.
Treta misija na Fakultetot e da po~ne da se sproveduva zakonot za
sport, so koj e predvideno vo sportot da mo`e da rabotat samo kadri koi
gi sozdava Fakuletot i koi se edinstveno stru~ni za rabota vo ovaa
oblast. Vo na{ata dr`ava ima preku 2000 sportski klubovi, vo koi
rabotat neobrazovani i nestru~ni lica, a so toa mo`at mnogu pove}e da
na{tetat, otkolku da im pomognat na decata, mladite i vozrasnite
kategorii vo sportot, no i vo rekreacijata.
^etvrta misija e vospostvauvawe sorabotka so ostanatite srodni
fakulteti vo sosedstvoto, no i vo Evropa, preku u~estvo vo zaedni~ni
proekti i razmena na studenti i nastavno-nau~en kadar. Na toj na~in bi
se ovozmo`ilo ne samo, pribli`uvawe na nastavnite programi, tuku i
obuka na nastavnicite vo odnos na metodite i na~inite na sproveduvawe
na nastavata i ispitite. Osven toa, taka bi se ovozmo`ilo i zedni~ko
u~estvo na istra`uva~ki proekti, so koi mo`e da se sporeduvaat
rezultatite, no i da se utvrdat nasokite za vo idnina.
3.NASTAVNO-NAU^EN, SORABOTNI^KI I
ADMINISTRATIVEN KADAR
3.1. Nastavno-nau~en i sorabotni~ki kadar
Na Fakultetot za fizi~ka kultura vo Skopje se vraboteni vkupno
29 lica, od koi nastavno-nau~niot kadar go so~inuvaat 23 nastavni~ki i
6 sorabotni~ki kadri. Pritoa od niv 17 se redovni profesori, 6
vonredni profesori, 1 asistent so doktorat, 5 asistenti i 1 pomlad
asistent. Osven toa na Fakultetot imame i nastavno-nau~en kadar
(~etiri nastavnici), od drugi fakulteti. Na Fakultetot ima samo 4
nastavnici i 2 asistenti od `enski pol.
Starosnata struktura na nastavniot kadar na Fakultetot e takva
da ima eden profesor koj od po~etokot na ovaa u~ebna godina e vo
penzija, a vtoriot profesor, pak e vo penzija od januari. No na
predmetite koi tie gi predavaat ima sorabotnici, koi }e mo`at vo
naredniot period da gi prevzemat obvrskite okolu istite. Sepak, nema
5
asistenti na site predmeti i zaradi toa se vlo{eni pokazatelite za
brojot na sorabotnici na eden nastavnik. Istite bi trebalo da se okolu
eden, {to bi zna~elo deka sekoj nastavnik ima sorabotnik. Na
Univerzitetot ovoj pokazatel se dvi`i od 1,5 do 4 (isklu~ok e
medicinskiot fakultet kade iznesuva 0,5). Na FFK toj e pribli`no 4.
Ova zna~i deka sostojbata na na{iot Fakultet e identi~na so pove}e
fakulteti na celiot Univerzitet. Kaj nas, asistetnite se anga`irani
samo na eden predmet i ne u~estvuvaat vo nastavata (prakti~na ili
teoretska) na drugi predmeti. Zaradi toa, se javuva zgolemena
opteretenost na nastavnicite koi nemaat sorabotnici, bidej}i samite
treba da gi dr`at ~asovite i na teoretskata i na prakti~nata nastava i
da ja vodat celokupnata evidencija za prisustvo na ~asovite, za sledewe
na aktivnosta na studentite za vreme na nastavata, za aktivnostite
okolu izbor na tema za seminarska i nejzina izrabotka i evidencija
okolu polagaweto na kolkviumite i ispitite. Ako se zeme predvid deka
tie predavaat i po dva predmeti, toga{ mo`e da se zaklu~i deka nivnata
optovarenost e mnogu golema. Spored Pravilnikot za normativite i
standardite za vr{ewe na visokoobrazovna dejnost, nastavnicite bi
trebalo da imaat 8 ~asa nedelno, a sorabotnicite 14, i toj kriterium vo
odnos na nastavata, na Fakultetot se primenuva.
Osven toa, nastavnicite i sorabotnicite ne se anga`irani samo
okolu nastavata, tuku i vo nau~no-istra`uva~kata rabota (u~estvo na
kongresi, simpoziumi, proekti). Zaradi toa morame da istakneme deka bi
trebalo da se korigira ovaa restriktivna politika za vrabotuvawe na
mladi kadri na Univerzitetot no Fakultetot i vo naredniot period da
se ovozmo`i vrabotuvawe na sorabotnici na site predmeti. Vo me|uvreme
bi mo`ele sorabotnicite da "pomagaat" i okolu drugi srodni predmeti,
{to e praksa na pove}e fakulteti.
So odluka na Nastavno-nau~niot sovet broj 0201-380/6 od 12.05.2011
godina, se donese odluka vo komisiite za diplomski raboti da mo`at da
u~estvuvaat i sorabotnicite na predmetot od ~ija oblast e diplomskata.
So toa se ovozmo`i nivno pointenzivno vklu~uvawe i vo istra`uva~kata
rabota i vo stru~nite aspekti na sekoj predmet.
I voveduvaweto na EKTS na Fakultetot, bara dopolnitelna
anga`iranost na nastavniot i sorabotni~kiot kadar. No bavnoto
obnovuvawe i stareeweto na nastavniot kadar, a namaluvaweto i
neobnovuvaweto na sorabotni~kiot kadar, mo`e da pretstavuva problem
vo kvalitetna implementacija na EKTS vo idnina, no i vo
postdiplomskite i doktorskite studii, kako i vo nau~noistra`uva~kata
rabota.
3.2. Za Centarot za fizi~ko obrazovanie
Vo sostavot na Fakultetot od 1992 godina e i Centarot za fizi~ko
obrazovanie, kade rabotat: 1 profesor na visoka {kola, 10 vi{i
6
predava~i i 1 predava~. Toj realizira nastava po fizi~ko obrazovanie i
sportski aktivnosti za studentite na site fakulteti na Univerzitetot
"Sv. Kiril i Metodij", osven na studentite na Fakultetot za fizi~ka
kultura. I pokraj toa {to na pove}e fakulteti vakva nastava e
predvidena vo site studiski godini, sepak, naj~esto istata se izveduva
samo vo prva godina. Problem pretstavuva toa {to ovaa nastava se
izveduva vo iznajmeni sportski objekti, pa za istata mora da se plati. Za
`al, fakultetite ne ja pla}aat ovaa nastava, a Univerzitetot "Sv. Kiril
i Metodij", odnosno Rektoratot, mo`ebi treba da se zalo`at pove}e za
da gi prinudat oddelnite fakulteti da si ja platat nastavata za nivnite
studenti.
Vo poslednite godini duri na nekoi fakulteti se slu~uva{e ovaa
nastava voop{to da ne se izveduva, a studentite na mati~nite fakulteti
da dobivaat potpis za istata od nivnite nastavnici, namesto od
nastavnicite od Centarot za fizi~ko obrazovanie. Najverojatno pri~ina
za ovaa sostojba e toa {to, ovaa nastava sekoj fakultet treba da ja pla}a.
Sakaj}i da go izbegnat toa, im zemale na svoite studenti pomala suma na
pari (koja ostanuvala na nivnite fakulteti) i im davale potpis.
Se nadevame deka vo idnina, Univeritetot }e se zalo`i ovaa
sostojba da ne se povtoruva i }e se zalo`i sekoj fakultet da si ja pla}a
nastavata po fizi~ko obrazovanie i sport, bidej}i vo izminatite godini
se slu~uva{e Fakultetot za fizi~ka kultura (bidej}i Centarot za
fizi~ko obrazovanie ne e praven subjekt) da e istovremeno i davatel na
uslugata (nastava po fizi~ko obrazovanie i sport) i onoj koj pla}a za
studentite od celiot Univerzitet da ja imaat nastavata koja im e
predvidena so nastavnite programi. Tokmu zaradi toa vo izminatite osum
godini, Fakultetot, pla}aj}i ja nastavata po fizi~ko obrazovanie i
sport, a koja ja izveduva Centarot, se soo~uva{e so golemi finansiski
problemi. Zatoa mora u{te edna{ da se potencira deka Univerzitetot so
svoite ~lenki, a preku nadle`nite institucii, mora da iznajde re{enie
za pokrivawe na finansiskite obvrski za uspe{no realizirawe na
nastavata po fizi~ko obrazovanie i sport.
Tokmu poradi vakvata te{ka finansiska sostojba na Fakultetot,
pri~ineta od nastavata na Centarot, so odluka na Nastavno-nau~niot
sovet na Fakultetot broj 0201-1220 od 3.12.2008 godina, be{e pokrenata
inicijativa za razdru`uvawe so Centarot za fizi~ko obrazovanie. Za
`al, taa ne se realizira. Vo Zakonot za visoko obrazovanie (Slu`ben
vesnik 35/08) ne be{e predvideno postoeweto na Centarot, tuku
Univerzitetski sportski centar. Vo 2010 godina Centarot za fizi~ko
obrazovanie be{e vklu~en vo Pravilnikot na Fakultetot, kade se
poso~eni nivnite prava i obvrski, no samo do iznao|awe na trajno
re{enie. Imeno, nemaj}i prostorni i materijalni uslovi za prevzemawe
na Centarot vo ramkite na Fakultetot, vo Pravilnikot e predvideno
istite da gi obezbedi Ministerstvoto za obrazovanie. Pritoa, za
iznao|awe na definitivno re{enie, treba da pomogne i Rektoratot i
7
Univerzitetot "Sv. Kiril i Metodij". Postojat dve mo`nosti, prvata e
Centarot za fizi~ko obrazovanie da se transformira vo Univerzitetski
sportski centar, a vtorata e sekoj fakultet da prevzeme po eden
nastavnik od ovoj Centar, koj }e ja izveduva nastavata po fizi~ko
obrazovanie i sport za toj fakultet. Dvete mo`nosti se dobri, so ogled
na toa {to dr`avata ve}e gi pla}a tie rabotni mesta, pa samo bi se
napravila preraspredelba.
Vo ovoj moment nastavnicite od Centarot nemaat sopstveni
prostorii za vr{ewe na svojata osnovna dejnost, tuku privremeno se
smesteni i obavuvaat nastava na Ma{inskiot fakultet vo Skopje.
3.3. Administrativen kadar
Administrativniot kadar na Fakultetot go so~inuvaat stru~en i
administrativno-tehni~ki kadar. Od niv 4 se so visoko obrazovanie, 1 e
so vi{o, 9 so sredno i 2 so osnovno obrazovanie. Od niv 11 se plateni
rabotni mesta od dr`avata, a 5 gi pla}ame od sopstveni sredstva.
Vo vrska so ova mora da se istakne deka vo poslednive godini, na
Fakultetot prakti~no nema novi rabotni mesta od ovoj kadar. Ova e
navistina problem, imaj}i predvid deka nekoi rabotni mesta treba da se
pla}aat od sopstveni sredstva. Taka na primer, prethodno i na
Fakultetot i vo Centarot imalo vraboteno po eden diplomiran pravnik
(zna~i vkupno dva), koi bile pla}ani od dr`avata i bez koi Fakultetot
ne mo`e da funkcionira, me|u drugoto i poradi toa {to zakonski se
regulirani nadle`nostite i obvrskite na sekretarot, kako i na~inot na
negovo birawe. I pokraj toa {to ve}e so godini edniot e vo penzija, a
drugiot e po~inat, ne se odvojuvaat sredstva za pravnikot (sega samo
eden) koj vo momentot raboti i go pla}ame od sopstveni sredstva. Se
nadevame deka dr`avata }e go re{i ovoj problem i vo idnina }e ni go
finansira ova rabotno mesto.
Osven toa, postoi problem i so tehni~kiot personal, bidej}i i
pokraj toa {to poslednite godini zaminaa vo penzija 2 ~ista~ki, nivnite
uprazneti mesta dravata ne gi finansira, pa i niv mora da gi pla}ame od
sopstveni sredstva. Potrebata od ovie rabotni mesta e naglasena i
zaradi specifi~nostite na nastavata na Fakultetot za fizi~ka kultura,
koja se izveduva i vo u~ilinica, no i vo salite.
8
4. NASTAVNO-OBRAZOVNA DEJNOST
4.1. Dodiplomski studii
4.1.1. Karakteristiki na studiskite programi
Na Fakultetot za fizi~ka kultura, ima dve studiski programi na
dodiplomskite studii, koi se vo odredena merka kompatibilni so
srodnite fakulteti vo na{eto sosedstvo (Srbija, Hrvatska, Slovenija,
Crna Gora i Bugarija). Ednata nasoka e fizi~ko obrazovanie, odnosno I
ciklus akademski studii za fizi~ko i zdravstveno obrazovanie, a
vtorata e sport, odnosno stru~ni studii za sportski treneri. Prvata
obu~uva idni profesori po fizi~ko vospitanie, a vtorata - diplomirani
treneri po odredena sportska disciplina.
Za nasokata I ciklus akademski studii za fizi~ko i zdravstveno
obrazovanie Fakultetot ima akreditacija od negovoto formirawe vo
1977 do denes. Istata e reformirana 1988, 2000 i 2010 i se realizira
vrz osnova na Re{enie za akreditacija na izmeni i dopolnuvawa na
studiski programi na I ciklus univerzitetski studii na studiskata
programa po fizi~ko i zdravstveno obrazovanie na Fakultetot za
fizi~ka kultura pri Univerzitetot "Sv. Kiril i Metodij", broj 12-116/4
od 22.10.2010 i Re{enie za po~etok so rabota broj 13-1570/1 od 8.03.2011
god. na studiskata programa od I ciklus univerzitetski studii na
studiskata programa po fizi~ko i zdravstveno obrazovanie na
Fakultetot za fizi~ka kultura pri Univerzitetot "Sv. Kiril i Metodij".
Od 2009/2010 godina ovie studii se realiziraat so nova studiska i novi
predmetni programi (ednosemestralni), vo soglasnost so EKTS sistemot.
Vo tek e i poslednata modifikacija na ovaa programa spored barawata
na Univerzitetot, a koe se odnesuva na toa sekoj student da mo`e da
slu{a predmeti i od drugi fakulteti (do 10% od vkupniot font na
~asovi). Za ovaa posledna modifikacija ima odluka na Nastavnonau~niot sovet na Fakultetot za fizi~ka kultura broj 0201-73/11 od
1.02.2012 god. za usvojuvawe na predlog proekt za izmeni i dopolnuvawa
na ~etirigodi{nite univerzitetski studii po fizi~ko i zdravstveno
obrazovanie na FFK. Za istata e dobiena soglasnost od Rektorskata
uprava i Senatot na Univerzitetot "Sv. Kiril i Metodij", a potoa }e se
dostavi i do Odborot za akreditacija, no se o~ekuva dobivawe na istata,
poradi toa {to izmenite vo odnos na prethodnata (akreditiranata)
studiska programa se minimalni i se odnesuvaat samo na usoglasuvawata
koi gi bara UKIM. Na ovaa nasoka se obu~uvaat profesori po fizi~ko i
zdravstveno obrazovanie. Nastavata na ovaa nasoka se realizira vo 8
semestri.
9
Od 2001/2002 godina na Fakultetot se realizira i vtorata nasoka za sport, odnosno I ciklus stru~ni studii za sportski treneri. Za nea
postoi re{enie za akreditacija na studiskata programa od I ciklus na
stru~ni studii za sportski treneri na Fakultetot za fizi~ka kultura
pri Univerzitetot "Sv. Kiril i Metodij" so broj 12-75/3, koe e dobieno na
20.12.2011. Re{enieto za po~etok so rabota na studiskata programa od I
ciklus na stru~ni studii za sportski treneri na Fakultetot za fizi~ka
kultura pri Univerzitetot "Sv. Kiril i Metodij" e so broj 13-848/1 od
1.02.2012 god. Vo tek e i poslednata modifikacija na ovaa programa
spored barawata na Univerzitetot "Sv. Kiril i Metodij", a koe se
odnesuva na toa sekoj student da mo`e da slu{a predmeti i od drugi
fakulteti (do 10% od vkupniot font na ~asovi). Za ovaa posledna
modifikacija ima odluka na Nastavno-nau~niot sovet na Fakultetot za
fizi~ka kultura broj 0201-73/12 od 1.02.2012 god. za usvojuvawe na
predlog proekt za izmeni i dopolnuvawa na studiskata programa od I
ciklus za trigodi{ni stru~ni studii za sportski treneri. Za istata e
dobiena soglasnost od Rektorskata uprava i Senatot na Univerzitetot
"Sv. Kiril i Metodij", a potoa }e se dostavi i do Odborot za
akreditacija, no se o~ekuva dobivawe na istata, poradi toa {to
izmenite vo odnos na prethodnata (akreditiranata) studiska programa se
minimalni i se odnesuvaat samo na usoglasuvawata koi gi bara UKIM.
Pritoa mora da se istakne nesebi~noto zalagawe na noviot Dekanat vo
ispolnuvawe na site kriteriumi i izvr{uvawe na site korekcii na
postoe~kata studiska programa za dobivawe na ovaa akreditacija.
Na ovaa nasoka se osposobuvaat diplomirani treneri po odredena
sportska disciplina. Vo vrska so ovie kadri koi se osposobuvaat na
Fakultetot, potrebno e da po~ne da se primenuva Zakonot za sport,
spored koj za site treneri koi rabotat vo nekoj sport, potrebno e da
imaat soodvetno obrazovanie. Nastavata na ovaa nasoka se realizira vo
6 semestri.
Osven postoe~kite programi, na Fakultetot ve}e se izraboteni
programi za dodiplomski studii za fizi~ko obrazovanie vo
predu~ili{na i oddelenska nastava. Fakultetot ima namera vo
najbliska idnina da pobara akreditacija i za niv.
Vo 1998 godina na Fakultetot zapo~na so osposobuvawe na treneri
po odredena sportska disciplina, no so vi{e obrazovanie (studiski
programi so 4 semestri). Ovaa programa postoe{e samo do 2000 godina,
koga zakonski prestanaa da postojat vi{ite {koli.
Za studiskite programi za kineziterapija vo fizi~kata kultura i
rekreacija postoi Soglasnost od Univerzitetot „Sv. Kiril i Metodij i od
nadle`niot resor za obrazovanie, u{te od 1988 godina, no tie seu{te ne
10
po~nale da se realiziraat. Mo`ebi treba da se podnese barawe do
odborot za akreditacija i za niv.
Na Fakultetot se primenuva principot na interdisciplinarnost
vo studiskite programi. Taka, na Fakultetot predavaat vkupno ~etiri
nastavnici od drugi fakulteti, i toa 2 od medicinskiot, 1 od Pedagogija
i 1 od Fakultetot za op{tonarodna odbrana. No, vpe~atok e deka na
nekoi fakulteti i pokraj toa {to vo nastavnite programi imaat srodni i
sli~ni predmeti so na{iot Fakultet, na{ite nastavnici ne se
povikuvaat tamu da predavaat, odnosno ne postoi reciprocitet. Mo`ebi
stanuva zbor za neinformiranost, no sepak ovaa sostojba treba vo idnina
da se promeni. Osven toa, i pokraj toa {to vo nastavnite programi na
site fakulteti be{e postignat konsenzus za vklu~uvawe na predmetot
sport i sportski aktivnosti, toa ne e slu~aj na nekoi fakulteti i taa
nastava na nekoi fakulteti voop{to ne se izveduva, a studentite
dobivaat potpis od nastavnicite na mati~niot fakultet, a ne od na{ite
nastavnici. Ovaa praktika vo idnina treba da bide nadminata, bidej}i
nastavata mora da ja realiziraat stru~ni lica.
Pritoa, finansiraweto na nastavnicite koi predavaat kaj nas, a
se od drugi fakulteti, odi od smetkata na Fakultetot, a se presmetuva
po formula. Za `al, i za ova nema reciprocitet. Nekoi fakulteti od
Univerzitetot "Sv. Kiril i Metodij" pla}aat za nastavata po sport i
sportski aktivnosti, no sepak ne po istata formula i istiot princip
kako {to ni se naplatuvaat nam tie uslugi. So toa smetame deka FFK e
staven vo neramnopravna pozicija. Se nadevame deka vo bliska idnina
ovaa nepravilnost }e se koregira i istiot princip }e se primenuva na
site fakulteti od Univeriztetot.
Web stranata na Fakultetot za fizi~ka kultura postoi pove}e
godini, no ne be{e dopolnuvana so novi informacii. Od ovaa u~ebna
godina, noviot Dekanat insistira{e taa da profunkcionira. Taka, sega
taa e celosno redizajnirana i navistina sekojdnevno se dopolnuva so
site novi informacii koi im se potrebni na studentite.
Morame da napomeneme deka ovaa godina Rektorot odvoi odredeni
finansiski sredstva za da se formiraat Univerzitetski sportski ligi
vo ko{arka, rakomet, fudbal i odbojka, vo koi }e u~estvuvaat site
fakulteti, a {to pretstavuva vistinska promocija na sportot. Pritoa,
natprevarite }e se igraat vo novata sala na Fakultetot za fizi~ka
kultura. So ogled na toa {to celokupnata organizacija na ovie ligi }e mu
bide prepu{tena na Fakultetot za fizi~ka kultura, se nadevame deka }e
ja opravdame doverbata.
11
4.1.2. Struktura na studiskite programi
Ovaa godina (2012) Fakultetot za fizi~ka kultura izraboti
Pravilnik za studirawe za I ciklus na studii i Vodi~ za studirawe, koi
se vo zavr{na faza i vo bliska idnina }e bidat staveni vo funkcija. Vo
ovie dokumenti se regulirani pravata, obvrskite i mo`nostite na
studentite koi studiraat na dvete nasoki na Fakultetot za fizi~ka
kultura.
4.1.2.1. Studiska programa za predmetna nastava po fizi~ko
obrazovanie ili Prv ciklus akademski studii za
fizi~ko i zdravstveno obrazovanie
Na Fakultetot za fizi~ka kultura, na nasokata - I ciklus
akademski studii za fizi~ko i zdravstveno obrazovanie, vo momentov
postojat dve generacii na studenti. Generacijata na studenti koi se
zapi{ani 2004/2005 godina i koi sega se na treta i ~etvrta godina
studii, i generacijata zapi{ana vo 2009/2010 godina, a koi vo u~ebnata
2010/2011 se prva i vtora godina.
Tabela 1.
Nasoka - Prv ciklus akademski studii za
fizi~ko i zdravstveno obrazovanie
generacija
zapi{ana vo
2009/2010
god.
studiska
godina
1
2
3
2004/2005
4
god.
vkupno predmeti
zadol`itelni
predmeti
7
7
izborni
predmeti
3
2
fakultativni
predmeti
/
/
12
12
2
2
2
2
38
9
4
Od prika`anata tabela mo`e da se vidi deka na Fakultetot za
fizi~ka kultura, vo ovaa nasoka ima vkupno 47 predmeti vo site 4 godini
i vo 2 programi - stara so dvosemestralni ispiti i nova - so
ednosemestralni ispiti. Ako se zeme brojot na predmeti po novata
programa (prva i vtora godina) }e se vidi deka ima 14 zadol`itelni (ili
50%) i 5 izborni (ili 25%). Poslednoto osovremenuvawe na nastavnite
programi se slu~i 2009/2010 godina, od koga site predmeti se
ednosemestralni, sekako vo soglasnost so EKTS. Pritoa se vode{e
smetka za optovarenosta na studentite so predmetnite sodr`ini
(optovarenosta vo krediti e 60 po semestar). Osven toa, postojat 9
izborni predmeti, za da se izleze vo presret na razli~nite afiniteti
12
na studentite. Iako na Fakultetot za fizi~ka kultura postoi mo`nost za
pove}e izborni predmeti, nevozmo`no e da se organizira nastava za
pomalku studenti i vo pove}e grupi (spored afinitetite) zaradi
nemaweto prostorni uslovi. Re~isi na site predmeti (so mali
isklu~oci), postoi kontinuirano ocenuvawe so kolokviumi, seminarski
raboti ili drugi zada~i koi se razli~ni na sekoj predmet, so {to se
olesnuva polagaweto na ispitite. Procesot na voveduvawe na dodatok na
diploma (Diploma supplement) e vo tek.
Mora da se istakne deka na nekoi predmetni programi, naj~esto od
fakultativnite predmeti, predavaat lica ~ij izbor ne e usoglasen so
aktite za izbor na nastavni~kiot kadar.
Brojot na ~asovite za predavawa i ve`bi za studiskita programa fizi~ko obrazovanie, e zadovolitelen. Osven toa, studentite imaat
mo`nost posebno da navlezat vo odredena problematika i preku
izrabotka na seminarski raboti i preku konsultacii.
Sepak nedostasuvaat materijalni sredstva za osovremenuvawe na
nastavata so dijagnosti~ki metodi i postapki, za koi vo momentov
Fakultetot nema mo`nosti da gi obezbedi.
Na ovaa studiska programa predavaat vkupno 23 nastavnici i 6
asistenti.
4.1.2.2.
Studiska programa za sport ili
I ciklus stru~ni studii za sportski treneri
Na Fakultetot za fizi~ka kultura, na nasokata - I ciklus stru~ni
studii za sportski treneri, vo momentov postojat dve generacii na
studenti. Generacijata na studenti koi se zapi{ani 2004/2005 godina i
koi sega se na treta i ~etvrta godina studii, i generacijata zapi{ana vo
2009/2010 godina, a koi vo u~ebnata 2010/2011 se prva i vtora godina. Na
ovaa nasoka, po novata programa (so ednosemestralni predmeti) ima
vkupno 21 predmet, od koi 18 zadol`itelni i 2 izborni, a po starata
programa (so dvosemestralni predmeti) ima 48 zadol`itelni, 8 izborni
i 8 fakultativni predmeti. Poslednoto osovremenuvawe na nastavnite
programi se slu~i 2009/2010 godina, od koga site predmeti se
ednosemestralni, sekako vo soglasnost so EKTS. Pritoa sekako se
vode{e smetka za optovarenosta na studentite so predmetnite sodr`ini
(optovarenosta vo krediti e 60 po semestar). Osven toa, postojat dovolno
izborni predmeti (po dva vo godina), za da se izleze vo presret na
razli~nite afiniteti na studentite. Re~isi na site predmeti (so mali
isklu~oci), postoi kontinuirano ocenuvawe so kolokviumi, seminarski
raboti ili drugi zada~i, so {to se olesnuva polagaweto na ispitite.
13
Procesot na voveduvawe na dodatok na diploma (Diploma supplement)
e vo tek.
Ona {to e mnogu bitno e deka golem del od nastavniot kadar na
ovaa nasoka i samite se vklu~eni vo sportot, kako treneri vo sportski
klubovi, no i kako selektori na reprezentacijata na Makedonija vo
odredeni sportovi, {to na ovaa nasoka & dava posebna te`ina.
Mora da se istakne deka na nekoi predmetni programi, naj~esto od
fakultativnite predmeti, predavaat lica ~ij izbor ne e usoglasen so
aktite za izbor na nastavni~kiot kadar.
Tabela 2.
Nasoka - I ciklus stru~ni studii za sportski treneri
generacija
zapi{ana vo
2009/2010
god.
studiska
godina
1
2
zadol`itelni
predmeti
9
9
izborni
predmeti
2
/
fakultativni
predmeti
/
/
3
4
12
12
2
2
2
2
42
6
4
2004/2005
god.
vkupno predmeti
Brojot na ~asovite za predavawa i ve`bi za studiskata programa sport e zadovolitelen. Osven toa, studentite imaat mo`nost posebno da
navlezat vo odredena problematika i preku izrabotka na seminarski
raboti i preku konsultacii. Osven toa, mnogu ~esto studentite od ovaa
nasoka, prakti~nata nastava ja realiziraat i so neposredno u~estvo vo
organiziraweto na trena`niot proces vo sportskite klubovi. Studentite
u~estvuvaat i vo analizite na treninzite i na natprevarite, so {to
steknuvaat dragoceno iskustvo u{te za vreme na studiraweto.
Sepak nedostasuvaat materijalni sredstva za osovremenuvawe na
nastavata so dijagnosti~ki metodi i postapki, za koi vo momentov
Fakultetot nema mo`nosti da gi obezbedi.
Na ovaa studiska programa, za eden sport predavaat vkupno 22
nastavnici i 6 asistenti, no so ogled na toa {to ima pove}e sportovi vo
koi se vklu~eni i drugite nastavnici, mo`e da se ka`e deka re~isi site
nastavnici i sorabotnici predavaat i na ovaa nasoka.
4.1.2.3. Studiska programa za vi{e obrazovanie za sport
Ovaa studiska programa po~na da se realizira vo 1998 godina i
obrazuva{e kadri - treneri po odredena sportska disciplina (ili vi{i
sportski treneri). Vo ovaa nasoka bea opfateni re~isi istite predmeti
kako i vo nasokata sport, no vo pomal obem i so pomalku sodr`ini.
14
Studentite bea vklu~eni vo analizata i organizacijata na sportskite
natprevari od ponizok rang.
4.2. Postdiplomski studii
Na Fakultetot kontinuirano, od 1991/92 godina kontinuirano se
sproveduvaat poslediplomski studii (magisterski i specijalisti~ki).
Specijalisti~kite studii se realiziraat so studiski programi za
oddelni sportski disciplini ili oddelni predmeti za koi postoi
interes, a se raboti po mentoriski sistem. Magisterskite studii se
organiziraat vrz osnova na Soglasnost od Univerzitetot “Sv. Kiril i
Metodij” i od Ministerstvoto za obrazovanie i nauka. Vo 2000 godina se
podgotveni
novi
predmetni
programi
za
magisterskite
i
specijalisti~kite studii. Za niv e dobiena soglasnost od Univerzitetot
“Sv. Kiril i Metodij”, no ne i od Ministerstvoto za obrazovanie i nauka.
Poslednata modifikacija na nastavnite programi za magisterskite
studii, koja e vo soglasnost so EKTS sistemot i kontinuiranoto u~ewe e
napravena 2010/2011 godina. Za ovie studii e dobieno re{enie za
akreditacija na studiskata programa za Univerzitetski studii od II
ciklus (magisterski studii po kineziologija) na Fakultetot za fizi~ka
kultura pri Univerzitetot "Sv. Kiril i Metodij", so broj 12-98/8 od
11.11.2011 god. A re{enieto za po~etok so rabota na studiskata programa
za Univerzitetski studii od II ciklus (magisterski studii po
kineziologija) na Fakultetot za fizi~ka kultura pri Univerzitetot "Sv.
Kiril i Metodij", e so broj 13-847/1 i e od 1.02.2011 god.
Poslednata generacija na postdiplomci be{e realizirana vo
u~ebnata 2008/2009 godina, koga se zapi{aa 11 kandidati.
Vo tek e sorabotka so ekonomskiot fakultet od Univerzitetot “Sv.
Kiril i Metodij”, a vo vrska so vospostavuvawe na nova nasoka za II
stepen studii - Sportski menaxment, na koja }e predavaat nastavnici od
dvata fakulteti (Fakultet za fizi~ka kultura i Ekonomski fakultet).
Istata e vo zavr{na faza i se o~ekuva vo najskoro vreme da se dostavi
do Odborot za akreditacija zaradi dobivawe na akreditacija i re{enie
za rabota.
Fakultetot za fizi~ka kultura e vo faza na pregovori i so
Medicinskiot fakultet vo Skopje, a vo vrska so otvarawe na zaedni~ka
studiska programa za Univerzitetski studii od II ciklus po
kineziterapija.
Fakultetot vo najbliska idnina mora da ponudi i drugi nasoki na
postdiplomski studii, na primer, za rekreacija, za sportsko pravo, za
sportsko novinarstvo, za zdravje i dr.
15
4.3. Doktorski studii
Na Fakultetot vo periodot 2010/2011 godina e izrabotena i nova
studiska programa za doktorski studii, a koja e vo soglasnost so EKTS
sistemot. Za III ciklus na studii (doktorski studii) ima odluka od
Univerzitetskiot senat so broj 02-533/2 od 8.07.2010 god. za usvojuvawe
na proekt za voveduvawe na studiska programa od III ciklus doktorski
studii po kineziologija.
I za ovaa studiska programa e podneseno barawe do Odborot za
akreditacija i se ~eka soglasnost.
5. PROSTORNI I MATERIJALNO-TEHNI^KI RESURSI
Prostornite uslovi na Fakultetot za fizi~ka kultura vo Skopje
samo delumno gi zadovoluvaat potrebite, prvenstveno zaradi toa {to gi
koristime zaedno so Sportskata gimnazija “Metodij Mitevski - Brico”.
Zaradi toa nastavata na Fakultetot se izveduva vo dve smeni.
Sostojbata se uslo`nuva zaradi nemawe na termini vo koi studentite }e
mo`at dopolnitelno da se anga`iraat i ve`baat za sovladuvawe na
nastavnite sodr`ini od prakti~niot del na ispitite. Sostojbata bi bila
polesna dokolku Fakultetot bi rabotel samo vo edna smena. Vkupnata
povr{ina na predavalnite na Fakultetot, sportskite sali, kabinetite
za nastavno-nau~niot kadar, kako i na nastavnata dejnost na Centarot e
5362 m2. Povr{inata na ovoj prostor na eden student ne gi zadovoluva
kriteriumite vo odnos na kvalitetot na materijalno-tehni~kite uslovi.
Noviot dekanat se obiduva da go re{i ovoj problem, na toj na~in
{to podnese ideen proekt i barawe za rekonstrukcija na
administrativnata zgrada do Ministerstvoto za obrazovanie (Sektor za
investicii). Vo bliska idnina se o~ekuva ova barawe da se realizira
ili vo smisol na rekonstrukcija na postoe~kiot objekt ili vo smisol na
izgradba na sosema na nova zgrada.
Za potrebite na nastavata, Fakultetot koristi i dva amfiteatri
od drugi ustanovi (no samo za nastavata na Medicinski fakultet) i
bazen. No so ogled na toa deka za nivnoto koristewe FFK mora da pla}a
od sopstveni sredstva, toa go doveduva Fakultetot vo u{te polo{a
finansiska polo`ba.
Agencijata za mladi i sport i Ministerstvoto za obrazovanie
izgradija nova sportska sala na Fakuletot. Za `al, i taa ne mo`e vo
celost da se koristi i preku celata godina za potrebite na nastavata,
zaradi toa {to nema greewe, pa e nevozmo`no vo takvi uslovi da se dr`i
16
nastava (osobeno vo zima). So ogled na te{kata finansiska sostojba
zaradi dolgot, Fakultetot ne be{e vo sostojba ova da go obezbedi od
sopstveni sredstva. Zaradi toa, e podneseno barawe do Agencijata za
sport i mladi, koja se nadevame deka }e najde na~in {to poskoro da gi
obezbedi potrebnite sredstva, a se so cel novata sala da mo`e da se
upotrebuva za nastavata na FFK, no i za organizirawe na
Univerzitetskata sportska liga i vo idnina.
Pred izgradbata na salata, Fakultetot ima{e nadvore{no
igrali{te za ko{arka, odbojka, rakomet, fudbal i atletska pateka, koi
vo tekot na izgradbata na salata bea uni{teni. Zaradi toa, Fakultetot
za fizi~ka kultura podnese barawe do Agencijata za sport i mladi, za
povtorna izgradba na nadvore{ni multifunkcionalni objekti, koi }e
pridonesat vo sozdavawe na podobri uslovi za studirawe.
Osven toa, na Fakultetot nema soodveten amfiteatar. Nastavata
se izveduva vo u~ilnici ili koga brojot na studentite e pogolem, vo
adaptirana fiskulturna sala, koi koi ~esto se premali za da gi soberat
site studenti. Zaradi toa nastavata (naj~esto teoretskata, koga se
prisutni site studenti odedna{), ponekoga{ se izveduva ote`nato.
I materijalno- tehni~kite uslovi na Fakultetot ne se na zavidno
nivo i samo delumno gi zadovoluvaat potrebite na nastavnoistra`uva~kata rabota. Imeno, na Fakultetot sekoj nastavnik ima svoj
komjuter, t.e. laptop, koi se koristat vo nastavata. Site komjuteri se
vrzani vo internet mre`a i se povrzani me|usebno vo mre`a. Osven toa,
na Fakultetot ima 4 LCD - proektori, koi isto taka, se koristat vo
nastavata i nekolku skeneri. Sepak, morame da istakneme deka na
Fakultetot nema sovremeni aparati i softveri koi se koristat vo
svetot, a koi slu`at za podobra dijagnostika na sostojbata na
sportistite, no i za sledewe na nivnata sportska forma. Vo taa smisla
se pravat napori da se obnovi postoe~kata i da nabavi nova oprema za
taa namena.
Zaradi novite kriteriumi predvideni vo Zakonot za visokoto
obrazovanie, dr`avata treba da odobri pove}e sredstva za
nau~noistra`uva~ka rabota, za da mo`e pogolem broj na nastavnici i
sorabotnici da se vklu~at vo proekti i da mo`at da u~estvuvaat na
kongresi i simpoziumi vo stranstvo. Osven toa, treba da se potencira i
va`nosta na razmenata na kadar (nastavnici i sorabotnici) so srodni
fakulteti vo stranstvo.
So ogled na toa {to prostoriite na Fakultetot za fizi~ka kultura
se nao|aat vo strog centar, se slu~uva{e mnogu ~esto na parkingot na
Fakultetot da parkiraat i stanari od okolnite zgradi, no i vraboteni vo
drugi institucii od okolinata. Zaradi toa ~esto pati se slu~uvaa pomali
i pogolemi {teti na vozilata. No od ovaa godina Fakultetot uspea da
17
nabavi vrata so karti~ki samo za vrabotenite, pa e nadminata starata
praksa i e nevozmo`no drugi lica da go koristat parkingot na Fakuletot.
5.1. Biblioteka
Vo bibliotekata ima preku 4000 knigi. Me|utoa za `al, nivniot
broj e mal, no i izborot odi pove}e na knigi od makedonski i srpski jazik,
a mnogu malku ima stranski avtori i mnogu malku sovremena literatura.
Bibliotekata ne e vklu~ena vo elektronski sistem na razmena na knigi i
u~ebnici vo zemjata i vo stranstvo i ne postoi mo`nost za nara~ka na
knigi. Vrabotenite ne se informiraat za nabavkata na novi knigi. Vo
bibliotekata nema kompjuterski programi za nao|awe na bibliote~ni
podatoci, nitu za transfer na biblografski informacii. I brojot na
stranski stru~ni spisanija e nezna~itelen. Vo bibliotekata nema
fotokopir. Pogolem del od nastavnicite
imaat izdadeno u~ebno
pomagalo (knigi, skripti ili praktikumi), od koe studentite mo`at da
u~at i istite se zastapeni i vo bibliotekata.
Vo idnina bi trebalo da se otvori i kni`arnica na Fakultetot, za
da mo`at studentite koi sakaat da kupat kniga, toa da go storat na toj
na~in, a ne so kupuvawe li~no od profesorot.
5.2. Centar za fizi~ko obrazovanie
I Centarot za Fizi~ko obrazovanie (koj ne e praven subjekt),
nastavata ja izveduva vo iznajmeni objekti i za toa Fakultetot za
fizi~ka kultura, kako praven subjekt, e dol`en da pla}a. Vo momentov
im e otstapena salata na Ma{inskiot fakultet, vo koj ja izveduvaat
nastavata.
Univerzitetot "Sv. Kiril i Metodij" planira vo idnina Centarot
za fizi~ko obrazovanie da go modificira vo Univerzitetski sportski
centar. Za da ja ostvari taa cel, UKIM zapo~na so izgradba na
univerzitetska sala, koja }e ja koristi Univerzitetskiot sportski
centar i vo koj }e se odvivaat site aktivnosti na UKIM. Tamu se
predvideni i prostorii za vrabotenite vo toj centar.
5.3. Logistika
Slu`bata za studentski pra{awa ne e dovolno organizirana, pred
se zaradi toa {to ne e dovolno sovremena. Imeno, i pokraj postoeweto na
2 kompjuteri, sepak do sega ne postoe{e programa za vodewe na
evidencijata so baza na podatoci za sekoja studiska programa i za site
godini oddelno. No ovaa sostojba po~na da se menuva, pred se zaradi
stapuvaweto vo sila na zakonot za visoko obrazovanie so koj site
fakulteti se obvrzani da vovedat elektronsko bele`ewe i za
nastavniot i administrativniot kadar, no i za studentite. Od tie
18
pri~ini za studentite od prva godina na dvete nasoki, po~na uspe{no da
se implementira sistemot iKnow, so koj na studentite, profesorite,
asistentite i studentski pra{awa im se ovozmo`uva uvid za site
informacii vo vrska so nastavata, ispitite i obvrskite kon Fakultetot.
So toa i slu`bata za studenti pra{awa po~na da se osovremenuva i }e
mo`e da se vodi i elektronska evidencija za sekoj student i za sekoj
ispit oddelno i za site godini. Vo slu`bata za studentski pra{awa ima
trojca vraboteni i so toa potrebite se celosno zadovoleni.
6. STUDENTI
6.1. Dodiplomski studii
Na nasokata fizi~ko, vo u~ebnata 2010/2011 godina studiraat 258
studenti ili 108 vo prva godina, vo vtora 61, vo treta 38 i vo ~etvrta 51
studenti. Od niv, 241 se redovni, a 17 vonredni. Pritoa, 138 studenti se
zapi{ani vo dr`avana kvota, a 103 so samofinansirawe. Od niv, 241 se
redovni, a 17 vonredni.
Tabela 3.
Nasoka - akademski studii za fizi~ko
i zdravstveno obrazovanie
godina
1
2
3
4
vkupno
Tabela 4.
redovni studenti
dr`avna
samofinankvota
sirawe
51
45
36
23
24
13
27
22
138
103
vonredni
studenti
12
2
1
2
17
vkupno
108
61
38
51
258
Nasoka - stru~ni studii za sportski treneri
godina
1
2
3
4
vkupno
redovni studenti
dr`avna
samofinankvota
sirawe
/
/
28
4
23
8
17
11
68
23
vonredni
studenti
25
4
8
6
43
vkupno
25
36
39
34
134
Na apsolventski sta` se 21 student vo dr`avna kvota, 45 studenti
so samofinansirawe i 12 vonredni studenti.
Na nasokata za sport vo momentov studiraat 134 studenti ili 25 vo
prva godina, vo vtora 36, vo treta 39 i vo ~etvrta 34 studenti. Od niv, 91
19
se redovni, a 43 vonredni. Pritoa, 68 studenti se zapi{ani vo dr`avana
kvota, a 66 so samofinansirawe. Na ovaa nasoka vo momentov ima 34
studenti od ovaa nasoka koi se na apsolventski sta`, i toa vo dr`avna
kvota, 17 so samofinansirawe i 9 vonredni.
6.1.1. Studentska anketa
Za potrebite na Komisijata za samoevaluacija, me|u drugoto e
sprovedena i anonimna studentska anketa. Istata sodr`e{e 44 pra{awa
i e sprovedena na 57 studenti od vtora godina.
6.1.1.1. Informiranost
Najgolem del od anketiranite studenti (86%) se dobro
informirani za toa kolku i kakvi nasoki ima na Fakultetot za fizi~ka
kultura. Samo 7% od studentite ne se informirani, i isto tolku (7%)
delumno se zapoznaeni so mo`nostite za studirawe na ovoj fakultet.
6.1.1.2.
Prisustvo na nastava i rabota vo tek na semestarot
Najgolem del od studentite se redovno prisatni na teoretskata
nastava (86%), a 98% od niv se redovni na prakti~nata nastava po site
predmeti.
6.1.1.3.
Mislewe na studentite za predmetite
od studiskite programi od vtora godina
Vrz osnova na dobienite rezultati od anketata, mo`eme da ka`eme
deka za 56% od studentite, predavawata se interesni, a za 30% se
te{ki. Mnozinstvoto od studentite mo`at da gi sledat predavawata i da
gi razberat, {to verojatno me|u drugoto zna~i deka imale dovolno
predznaewa od sredno u~ili{te, za da mo`at na Fakultetot za fizi~ka
kultura da gi nadgradat. No za 30% od studentite predavawata se te{ki.
Pri~inata za ova verojatno e postoeweto na predmeti od pove}e oblasti
koi imaat svoi specifi~nosti, a mo`ebi i zavr{eni sredni u~ili{ta
koi ne im ovozmo`ile dovolno predznaewa. Mo`ebi vo idnina treba da
se primenuvaat drugi metodi i na~ini na prezentirawe na sodr`inite
koi na studentite im se pote{ki za razbirawe i u~ewe.
Tabela 5.
Mislewe na studentite za predmetite
od studiskite programi od vtora godina
predmetite se interesni
procent
na
studenti
56%
te{ki neophodni zdodevni nepotrebni
30%
7%
5%
2%
lesni
/
20
Vo ramkite na mo`nostite na Fakultetot da se obezbedat sredstva
i za dopolnitelna nabavka na oprema i aparati so ~ija pomo{ }e mo`e
polesno da se razberat pote{kite sodr`ini. Samo 7% od studentite
smetaat deka predmetite od vtora godina na Fakultetot za fizi~ka
kultura se zdodevni ili nepotrebni.
6.1.1.4.
Potrebno vreme za u~ewe
Na Univerzitetot „Sv Kiril i Metodij” studentite prose~no u~at 2
do 5 ~asa sekojdnevno. Na Fakultetot za fizi~ka kultura 51% od
studentite u~at od 1 do 3 ~asa, {to e pribli`no kako na celiot UKIM. I
pokraj toa {to za 30% od studentite predmetite na Fakultetot za
fizi~ka kultura se te{ki (tabela 5), sepak samo 7% od studentite u~at
od 3 do 5 ~asovi dnevno, a duri 42% od niv u~at pomalku od 1 ~as sekoj
den, {to zna~i deka sepak nastavata na Fakultetot e na visoko nivo, od
edna strana, a od druga strana, golem del od studentite se vrvni
sportisti, {to e pri~inata golem del od materijalot polesno da go
sovladaat.
Tabela 6.
Kolku vreme pominuvaat
studentite vo u~ewe sekojdnevno?
kolku ~asovi
na den u~at?
procent
na
studenti
pomalku
od 1 ~as
od 1 do 3
~asovi
od 3 do 5
~asovi
pove}e od
5 ~asovi
42%
51%
7%
/
Na Univerzitetot „Sv Kiril i Metodij” na pove}e od polovina od
studentite prose~no im trebaat pove}e od 5 dena za da podgotvat
kolokvium ili test, a na 1/3 im trebaat 3 dena. Na Fakultetot za
fizi~ka kultura na 39% od studentite im trebaat od 3 do 5 denovi, a na
22% od 5 do 7 denovi. Samo na 16% im trebaat pomalku od 3 dena, na 14%
im trebaat pove}e od 10 denovi za da se podgotvat za kolokvium ili
ispit.
Tabela 7.
Kolku denovi im se potrebni na
studentite za da podgotvat kolokvium
kolku denovi
u~at?
procent
na
studenti
pomalku
od 3 dena
od 3 do 5
denovi
od 5 do 7
denovi
od 7 do 10
denovi
pove}e od
10 denovi
16%
39%
22%
9%
14%
Na 37% od studentite na Univerzitetot „Sv Kiril i Metodij” im
trebaat 15 dena za da podgotvat zavr{en ispit, a na isto tolku (37%) im
trebaat 30 dena. Na Fakultetot za fizi~ka kultura na 79% od
studentite im trebaat pomalku od 15 dena za da podgotvat zavr{en ispit,
21
a samo na 21% im trebaat pove}e od 15 dena. Na 16% od studentite im se
dovolni pomalku od 5 dena za ovaa namena.
Tabela 8.
Kolku denovi im se potrebni na
studentite za podgotvat zavr{en ispit
kolku denovi
u~at?
procent
na
studenti
6.1.1.5.
pomalku
od 5 dena
od 5 do 10
denovi
od 10 do
15 denovi
pove}e od
15 denovi
16%
39%
24%
21%
Literatura
Koga stanuva zbor za koristenata literatura na predmetite od
vtora godina, zaklu~ok od sprovedenata anketa e deka del od studentite
(64%) koristat originalni knigi od profesorite koi imaat u~ebnik ili
od drugi avtori, no knigi ili u~ebnici, drugi koristat fotokopii na
knigi ili u~ebnici (54%), treti - bele{ki od predavawa (30%), a samo
mal del koristat elektronska forma (10%). Morame da potencirame
deka vkupniot procent e pogolem zaradi toa {to eden student mo`e da
koristi pove}e formi na literatura na pove}e predmeti.
Tabela 9.
Kakva literaturata koristat studentite od
vtora godina na Fakultetot za fizi~ka kultura
kakva literatura
koristat
procent na
studenti
originalni
knigi
fotokopii
bele{ki od
predavawa
elektronska
forma
60%
54%
30%
10%
Pritoa, 39% od studentite smetaat deka literaturata e
razbirliva, 44% smetaat deka taa e samo delumno razbirliva, a 17%
mislat deka istata voop{to ne e razbirliva. 61% smetaat deka taa e
usoglasena so predavawata, 30% smetaat deka toa e samo delumno, a 7%
mislat deka voop{to ne e usoglasena.
Ovde morame da potencirame edna slabost na celiot sistem na
UKIM vo vrska so literaturata, za koja vo idnina }e mora da se najde
re{enie (na nivo na celiot Univerzitet), koe }e gi usoglasi potrebite i
na studentite i na profesorite. Vo {to e problemot?
Imeno, od edna strana se studentite, koi baraat {to e mo`no
pove}e profesori da imaat svoi u~ebnici, bidej}i taka se predavawata i
u~ebnicite kompletno usoglaseni, istite se na makedonski, pa u~eweto
im e polesno i pobrzo. No site studenti, iako gi znaat prednostite, sepak
ne sakaat da ja kupat knigata na profesorot, pa na krajot, del od
studentite gi kupuva u~ebnicite (na nivo na UKIM samo 15% od
22
studentite), a drug del gi fotokopira (na nivo na UKIM duri 73% od
studentite), ili duri i pozajmuva, smetaj}i deka otakako }e go polo`at
ispitot, knigite pove}e nikoga{ nema da im bidat potrebni, {to ne e
taka.
Od druga strana se profesorite, koi ne se stimulirani da
pi{uvaat knigi ili u~ebnici, bidej}i avtorskite prava ne im se
za{titeni. Imeno, iako fotokopiraweto e zabraneto so zakon, ni{to ne
mo`at da prevzemat (iako postojat zakonski odredbi koi se odnesuvaat
na ovaa problematika).
Vo vrska so cenata na knigite, morame da istakneme deka iako mal
del od cenite se previsoki (i moraat da se korigiraat, na predlog na
mati~niot fakultet ili na UKIM), sepak pogolem broj na u~ebnici imaat
pristapna cena, koja i kako takva, za mnogu studenti ne e dovolno niska.
Kako da ne se zema predvid vlo`eniot trud na profesorot za da napi{e
kniga ili u~ebnik i te`inata na napi{anoto, tuku vrednosta na knigata
se presmetuva kako da se smeta samo potrebnata hartija, {to ne vo red.
6.1.1.6.
Mislewe za nastavnicite
Tabela 10. Mislewe na studentite za
profesorite od vtora godina na
Fakultetot za fizi~ka kultura
profesorite se:
procent na studenti
koi odgovorile so
da
procent na studenti
koi odgovorile so
ne
procent na studenti
koi odgovorile so
delumno
redovni na
predavawa
imaat
razbirlivi
predavawa
podgotveni
na predavawa
pottiknuvaat
interaktivnost
72%
65%
79%
63%
5%
2%
2%
12%
10%
28%
21%
26%
Tabela 10 (prodol`enie).
profesorite se:
procent na studenti
koi odgovorile so da
procent na studenti
koi odgovorile so ne
procent na studenti
koi odgovorile so
delumno
korektno se
odnesuvaat
dostapni za
konsultacii
po~ituvaat
mislewe na
studentite
68%
56%
53%
5%
12%
9%
25%
32%
38%
23
Spored dobienite rezultati od sprovedenata anketa na studentite
od vtora godina, mo`eme da ka`eme deka 72%od studentite smetaat deka
profesorite se redovni na predavawata, 79% mislat deka profesorite
doa|aat podgotveni na predavawata, a 65% od niv imaat razbirlivi
predavawa. Mnozinstvoto od profesorite se odnesuvaat korektno (68%)
i pottiknuvaat interaktivnost (63%), no edvaj polovinata od niv se
dostapni za konsultacii (56%). Sostojbata e sli~na i UKIM.
Morame da napomeneme deka profesorite prvo treba da gi
ispolnuvaat svoite rabotni zada~i i da bidat redovni na predavawata.
Osven toa treba da se potrudat predavawata da bidat porazbirlivi ili
po mo`nost da koristat drugi metodi i na~ini kako da ja prezentiraat
materijata koja studentite pote{ko ja razbiraat. Na krajot mora da se
napomene deka komunikacijata so studentite mora da bide podobra, a
konsultaciite bi trebale da im pomognat na studentite polesno da ja
sovladaat
materijata.
Verojatno,
del
od
profesorite
se
potradicionalni i zaradi toa pote{ko go prifa}aat misleweto na
studentite (53%).
Tabela 11. Mislewe na studentite za predavawata
na profesorite od vtora godina na
Fakultetot za fizi~ka kultura
predavawata na
profesorite se
procent na
studenti
interesni korisni neinteresni zdodevni
31%
57%
5%
7%
Za 88% od studentite predavawata na profesorite od vtora
godina se interesni ili korisni, a samo za 5% neinteresni i za 7%
zdodevni.
6.1.1.7.
Mislewe za asistentite
Na UKIM asistentite se poredovni na nastavata od profesorite,
ve`bite im se porazbirlivi na studentite otkolku predavawata i imaat
podobra komunikacija so studentite, polesno ostvarlivi konsultacii. Za
`al, spored dobienite rezultati od studentskata anketa mo`eme da
ka`eme deka
profesorite na Fakultetot za fizi~ka kultura se
poredovni, popodgotveni za predavawata i imaat porazbirlivi
predavawa, vo sporedba so redovnosta, podgotvenosta i razbirlivosta na
asistentite. Spored misleweto na studentite profesorite pove}e
pottiknuvaat interaktivnost, pokorektno se odnesuvaat, pove}e go
po~ituvaat misleweto na studentite (53%) vo sporedba so asistentite
(49%) i se re~isi isto dostapni za konsultacii (56%), kako i asistentite
(60%).
24
Kako zaklu~ok morame da istakneme deka asistentite moraat se
potrudat pove}e i vo odnos na nastavata (redovnost, podgotvenost i
razbirlivost na ve`bite), i vo odnos na nivniot odnos kon studentite, no
i vo odnos na nivnata komunikacija so pomladite kolegi (vo smisla na
konsultacii i razmena na mislewe).
Tabela 12. Mislewe na studentite za
asistentite od vtora godina na
Fakultetot za fizi~ka kultura
asistentite se:
redovni na
prakti~na
nastava
imaat
razbirlivi
ve`bi
podgotveni
za prakti~nata
nastava
pottiknuvaat
interaktivnost
68%
60%
70%
56%
7%
20%
4%
14%
25%
20%
26%
30%
procent na studenti
koi odgovorile so
da
procent na studenti
koi odgovorile so
ne
procent na studenti
koi odgovorile so
delumno
Tabela 12 (prodol`enie).
asistentite se:
procent na
studenti koi
odgovorile so da
procent na
studenti koi
odgovorile so ne
procent na
studenti koi
odgovorile so
delumno
korektno se
odnesuvaat
dostapni za
konsultacii
po~ituvaat
mislewe na
studentite
61%
60%
49%
14%
10%
12%
25%
30%
39%
Tabela 13. Mislewe na studentite za prakti~nata nastava
vo vtora godina na Fakultetot za fizi~ka kultura
ve`bite na
asistentite se
procent na
studenti
interesni korisni neinteresni zdodevni
42%
39%
5%
7%
25
6.1.1.8.
Kolokviumi/testovi
Od rezultatite dobieni so anonimnata studentska anketa mo`e da
se zaklu~i deka na pove}e od polovina od studentite (56%) im e
odnapred poznat na~inot na ocenuvawe na koloviumite ili testovite.
60% smetaat deka ocenuvaweto e objektivno, za 61% od studentite
rezultatite od kolokviumite se dostapni za uvid i komentari, a za 60%
od niv pra{awata na kolokviumite se jasni i nedvosmisleni.
Bi morale da potencirame deka na onie predmeti kade ne e
odnapred jasen na~inot na ocenuvawe, profesorite da se obidat da bidat
potransparentni i da im se uka`e na studentite koi aktivnosti kolku
bodovi im nosat. Osven toa, site profesori treba da se potrudat
pra{awata za testovite ili kolokviumite da bidat jasni i
nedvosmisleni. Na krajot, nastavnicite moraat da im gi dadat na uvid
testovite ili kolokviumite na studentite, za da mo`at da vidat kade
zgre{ile, no i da se uverat vo objektivnosta na ocenuva~ot (profesorot).
Tabela 14. Mislewe na studentite za
koloviumite/testovite
kolokviumite/
testovite se:
procent na studenti
koi odgovorile so
da
procent na studenti
koi odgovorile so
ne
procent na studenti
koi odgovorile so
delumno
6.1.1.9.
na~inot na
ocenuvawe
odnapred poznat
dali
ocenuvaweto e
objektivno
dali rezultatite se
dostapni za uvid i
komentari
dali se pra{awata
na kolokviumite
jasni i
nedvosmisleni
56%
60%
61%
60%
24%
14%
10%
10%
20%
26%
10%
30%
Zavr{en ispit
Samo na polovina od anketiranite studenti (50%) im e poznat
na~inot na ocenuvawe na zavr{niot ispit, a samo 37% smetaat deka
ocenuvaweto e objektivno, 60% mislat deka pra{awata na zavr{niot
ispit se jasni i nedvosmisleni, a samo za 44% od studentite rezultatite
od ispitot se dostapni za uvid. Sepak, studentite ne se dovolno
informirani i za toa kolku se boduvaat oddelni aktivnosti na sekoj
predmet (74%) i kako se formira zavr{nata ocena (68%).
Od ova mo`e da se zaklu~i deka profesorite moraat da se
potrudat pove}e i vo odnos na informirawe na studentite za na~inot na
ocenuvawe, vo odnos na boduvawe na site aktivnosti na studentite za da
se odbegne subjektivnosta pri ocenuvaweto, no i vo odnos na dostapnosta
na rezultatite od zavr{niot ispit na uvid.
26
Tabela 15. Mislewe na studentite
za zavr{niot ispit
kolokviumite/
testovite se:
na~inot na
ocenuvawe na
zavr{niot ispit e
odnapred poznat
dali
ocenuvaweto na
zavr{niot ispit
e objektivno
dali rezultatite
od zavr{niot ispit
se dostapni za uvid
i komentari
dali se pra{awata
na zavr{niot ispit
jasni i
nedvosmisleni
50%
37%
44%
60%
10%
10%
20%
10%
40%
53%
26%
30%
procent na studenti
koi odgovorile so
da
procent na studenti
koi odgovorile so
ne
procent na studenti
koi odgovorile so
delumno
Tabela 15 (prvo prodol`enie)
kolokviumite/
testovite se:
dali znaete
kolku bodovi vi
nosat oddelnite
aktivnosti
dali znaete kako
se formira
ocenkata na sekoj
predmet
dali znaete koi
uslovi treba da gi
ispolnite za da
polo`ite nekoj ispit
dali teoretskite
predavawa vi
pomagaat polesno da
go polo`ite ispitot
74%
68%
65%
72%
14%
30%
7%
5%
12%
2%
28%
24%
procent na
studenti koi
odgovorile so da
procent na
studenti koi
odgovorile so ne
procent na
studenti koi
odgovorile so
delumno
Tabela 15 (vtoro prodol`enie).
kolokviumite/
testovite se:
procent na
studenti koi
odgovorile so da
procent na
studenti koi
odgovorile so ne
procent na
studenti koi
odgovorile so
delumno
dali polagaweto na
kolokviumi vi go
olesnuva polagaweto
na zavr{niot ispit
dali ima ispiti koi
mo`e da gi polo`ite
samo so kolokviumi, a
bez zavr{en ispit
dali prakti~nata
nastava vi koristi
polesno da go
podgotvite ispitot
91%
91%
79%
/
9%
7%
9%
/
14%
Polagaweto na kolokviumi na 91% od studentite im pomaga
polesno da go polo`at zavr{niot ispit. Osven toa na 72% od studentite
teoretskite predavawa im pomognale, a na 79% od studentite
prisastvoto na prakti~nata nastava im pomognalo polesno da go polo`at
zavr{niot ispitot. Dobro e {to duri 91% od studentite ja koristat
27
mo`nosta da polo`at ispiti od vtora godina, samo so polagawe na
kolokviumi i ostvaruvawe na nekoi drugi obvrski (redovnost,
seminarska, praktikum), a bez zavr{en ispit.
6.1.1.10. Mobilnost na studentite
Spored dobienite rezultati od anketata, mo`eme da ka`eme deka
37% od studentite smetaat deka na Fakultetot za fizi~ka kultura ima
mobilnost, 40% smetaat deka taa e samo delumna, a 23% smetaat deka
voop{to nema mobilnost.
Vo odnos na ovoj problem smetame deka e neophodna pointenzivna
sorabotka so ostanatite fakulteti vo R. Makedonija, vo sosedstvoto
(Srbija, Bugarija, Crna Gora, Hrvatska, Slovenija), no i na podale~ni
destinacii vo Evropa. Potoa, vo slednata faza treba da se vovede
programata Erazmus, so koja }e se ovozmo`i vistinska mobilnost na
studentite, no i na profesorite i asistentite i prestoj na drugi srodni
ili isti fakulteti, so {to }e se ovozmo`i razmena na iskustva, mislewa
i znaewa.
75% od studentite na Fakultetot za fizi~ka kultura smetaat deka
steknatite znaewa za vreme na studiraweto mo`at da se primenat i vo
praksata, a 23% smetaat deka toa e samo delumno. Od ova proizleguva
deka na Fakultetot treba da se primenuvaat pove}e aplikativni
sodr`ini, koi vo u{te pogolem stepen }e gi osposobat studentite za
prakti~na rabota.
6.2. Postdiplomski studii (magisterski i specijalisti~ki)
Poslednata generacija na postdiplomci be{e zapi{ana vo
u~ebnata 2008/2009 godina, koga se zapi{aa 11 studenti. A od
formiraweto na postdiplomskite studii do sega se zapi{ale 236
studenti, a zavr{ile, odnosno magistrirale 74.
6.3. Doktorski studii
Za ovaa studiska programa e podneseno barawe do Odborot za
akreditacija i se ~eka soglasnost.
Morame da napomeneme deka vo izminatiot period zaradi Zakonot
za visoko obrazovanie spored koj zaklu~no so 31.12.2011 godina,
kandidatite koi gi ispolnuvaa uslovite mo`ea da prijavat proekt za
doktorska disertacija (bez doktorski studii), 30 kandidati podnesoa
proekti, a od niv 20 gi ispolnuvaa kriteriumite i istite se usvoeni, {to
zna~i deka im e odobreno da po~nat da ja rabotat svojata doktorska
rabota.
28
6.4. Nadvore{na sorabotka
Do sega nemalo praktika nastavnicite i sorabotnicite od
Fakultetot za fizi~ka kultura, da prestojuvaat na drugi fakulteti vo
stranstvo. Mo`ebi vo idnina bi bilo dobro i korisno, ova da se promeni.
Imeno, najbitna e sekako razmenata na iskustva i znaewa vo oblastite
koi se izu~uvaat kaj nas, no i da se vidat, a potoa i implementiraat i
novite moduli na sproveduvawe na nastavnite sodr`ini, a se so cel
nastavata da se modernizira i osovremeni. Osven toa, na toj na~in }e
mo`e da se pro{iri sorabotkata i preku zaedni~ko u~estvo na
me|unarodni proekti, a so toa }e se ovozmo`i stekuvawe na pogolemo
nau~no-istra`uva~ko iskustvo.
Postojat poedine~ni primeri na profesori koi predavaat na
magisterski ili doktorski studii vo stranstvo, pred se na biv{ite
jugoslovenski prostori, no taa brojka sepak bi trebalo da bide pogolema.
Osven toa, mnogu se retki primerite na nastavnici od stranstvo koi
doa|aat da predavaat na osnovni ili postdiplomski studii.
Osven sorabotkata so fakultetite i Univerzitetite vo stranstvo,
mnogu e va`na i sorabotkata so drugite organizacii i asocijacii, a koja
do sega be{e relativno slaba. No noviot Dekanat se obiduva da
vospostavi podobra komunikacija i sorabotka so Agencijata za mladi i
sport, a se so cel da se pomogne sproveduvaweto na Zakonot za sport so
koj e predvideno vo sportot da rabotat samo treneri koi imaat soodvetno
sobrazovanie. Potoa, bi trebalo da se podobri sorabotkata so MOK
(Makedonski olimpiski komitet), bidej}i stru~niot kadar na Fakultetot
mo`e aktivno da u~estvuva i da pomogne vo podgotovkite na kandidatite
za Olimiski igri. Sorabotka so federaciite vo site sportovi, preku
obu~uvawe na kadar koj }e bide stru~no osposoben da raboti vo sekoj
sport oddelno, potoa preku testirawe na formata na sportistite,
pravewe na programi za psiholo{ka podgotovka, ishrana i dr.
Sorabotkata so Fakultetot za bezbednost e dobra i istata treba da
prodol`i.
6.5. Nau~no-istra`uva~ka dejnost
Nastavnicite i sorabotnicite na Fakultetot u~estvuvaat na
kongresi i simpoziumi, no vo pogolem obem na onie koi se organiziraat
vo zemjata, a pomalku vo stranstvo i toa pred se na biv{ite
jugoslovenski prostori i Bugarija, i objavuvaat stru~ni i nau~ni trudovi.
Na podale~ni destinacii sepak, mnogu poretko se patuva. Pri~ina za toa,
mo`e da bide i slabata poddr{ka od Ministerstvoto za nauka, koe i
pokraj toa {to odvojuva sredstva za taa namena, mnogu ~esto istite
docnat ili izostanuvaat. Ova bi trebalo da se koregira vo idnina,
osobeno zemaj}i go predvid i Zakonot za visoko obrazovanie, so koj e
predvideno da napreduvaweto vo zvawa e usloveno i od u~estvoto na
29
kogresi, odnosno od objavuvawe na trudovi vo spisanija so impakt faktor
(za {to isto taka se potrebni finansiski sredstva).
Nastavnicite i sorabotnicite na Fakultetot u~estvuvaat vo
nau~no-istra`uva~ki proekti, na nacionalno, no iako poretko i na
me|unarodno nivo. Istite glavno gi finansira Ministerstvoto za
obrazovanie i nauka. Vpe~atok e deka sepak brojot na realiziranite
proekti e relativno mal.
Fakultetot do sega ne uspea da dobie nekoj od evropskite
programi Tempus i Phare, iako poka`uva dovolno interes za u~estvo vo
niv. Tokmu toa {to Fakuletot nema realizirano aplikativni proekti, no
i toa {to mora{e da plati 13 milioni denari od sopstveni sredstva za
tu| dolg (objasnuvaweto e podolu), e edna od pri~inite za dosega{nata
slaba i nedovolna nau~no-istra`uva~ka oprema. No sega postojat
mo`nosti i ovaa sostojba da se promeni, pa e vo plan nabavka na nova i
sovremena oprema za nau~no-istra`uva~ka rabota (se razbira vo
granicite na mo`nostite).
Od osobeno golema va`nost e {to noviot Dekanat aplicira{e so
tri proekti, kade nositel e Fakultetot za fizi~ka kultura, i toa:
1.
2.
3.
Kontinuirano usovr{uvawe ili permanentna edukacija na
nastvanicite po fizi~ko obrazovanie vo R. Makedonija (proektot
e dostaven do Agencija za sport i mladi)
Analiza na iskoristenosta na ~asot po fizi~ko i zdravstveno
obrazovanie vo R. Makedonija (proektot e dostaven do
Ministerstvo za obrazovanie)
Samovrednuvawe i vrednuvawe na nastavata po fizi~ko i
zdravstveno obrazovanie vo srednite u~ili{ta vo gradot Skopje
(proektot e dostaven do gradona~alnikot na Skopje)
Se o~ekuva pozitiven ishod, odnosno prodlabo~uvawe na
sorabotkata so trite institucii i dobivawe na sredstva za da mo`e da
se realiziraat barem nekoi od proektite.
Osven toa, vo idnina Fakultetot planira i da organizira Kongres
ili Simpozium.
7. FINANSII
Fakultetot obezbeduva sredstva od dr`avata (buxetski), no se
finansira i od sopstveni sredstva. Na visinata na sredstvata bitno
vlijae{e namaluvaweto na dr`avnata kvota od 400 na 200 evra, a toa pak
vlijae{e na cenata za samofinansiraweto. Na toj na~in Fakultetot
poslednive dve godini ima pomal priliv na sredstva po taa osnova.
Osven toa, Fakultetot e prinuden od sopstveni sredstva da go pla}a i
30
sekretarot (pravnik), bez kogo institucijata ne bi mo`ela da raboti, no i
tehni~ki personal, za koi dr`avata isto taka, ne odvojuva sredstva.
Ovaa godina e donesen i noviot Pravilnik za plati, vo koj detalno
se regulirani site obvrski na vrabotenite, no i nagraduvaweto spored
izvr{enata rabotna zada~a.
Mora da se istakne deka Fakultetot dolgo vreme (izminatite 8
godini) e vo te{ka finansiska sostojba, pred se zaradi dolgot vo vrska
so koristewe na prostor za nastava na Centarot za fizi~ko obrazovanie.
Imeno, namesto site ostanati fakulteti na UKIM da ja pla}aat
nastavata za fizi~ko vospitanie i sport za svoite studenti i za
iznajmuvawe na objektite kade se vr{i istata, poradi nepravedni sudski
odluki Fakultetot be{e prinuden toa sam da go plati. Pritoa morame da
istakneme deka za taa cel se odvoeni okolu 11 milioni denari od
sopstveni sredstva i okolu 2 milioni denari buxetski sredstva, koi bea
dobieni za materijalni tro{oci na Fakultetot, a koi bea prisilno
odzemeni zaradi izvr{ni sudski re{enija. Istite, podocna bevme
prinudeni da gi nadomestime i vratime od sopstveni sredstva. Zaradi
toa i nekolku godini (za sre}a ne vo kontinuitet), smetkata na
Fakultetot be{e blokirana. Se nadevame deka vo idnina, Rektorot }e
mo`e ovaa gre{ka da ja ispravi i da ovozmo`i prvo, sproveduvawe na
Zakonot za visoko obrazovanie, so koj na site fakulteti e predviden
predmetot fizi~ko vospitanie i sport, a potoa i da se pogri`i sekoj
fakultet oddelno, taa nastava i da ja plati.
Se razbira deka vo idnina Fakultetot mora da se potrudi i da se
obide da najde novi na~ini na finansirawe (mo`ebi preku novi studiski
programi) i da se ovozmo`at novi na~ini na finansiska ili pomo{ vo
oprema od drugi institucii i fakulteti od stranstvo.
8. ZAKLU^OCI
1. Na Fakultetot ve}e se izraboteni programi i treba vo najbliska
idnina da pobara akreditacija i za dodiplomski studii za
fizi~ko obrazovanie vo:
• predu~ili{na nastava
• oddelenska nastava
• sportsko novinarstvo
• sportsko pravo
• sport i turizam
• nasoka kineziterapija
• nasoka rekreacija
• zdravje
• drugi
31
2. Osven toa, treba da se razmisli i da se ponudat pove}e nasoki i na
postdiplomskite, no i na doktorskite studii. Pritoa sekoj
nastavnik da se potrudi da poso~i sovremena i {to e mo`no ponova
literatura. Sekako bi trebalo da se sproveduvaat kolku e mo`no
pove}e istra`uvawa i tie da se prezentiraat na predavawata ili
da prezentiraat drugi istra`uvawa od sli~na oblast.
3. Da se donese odluka predmetot fizi~ko obrazovanie i sport da se
sproveduva kako zadol`itelen predmet na site fakulteti.
4. Da se ponudat izborni predmeti od Fakultetot na celiot
Univerzitet (vo ramkite na 10% od vkupniot font na ~asovi).
5. Bi trebalo da se korigira restriktivnata politika za
vrabotuvawe na mladi kadri na Univerzitetot "Sv. Kiril i
Metodij", i vo naredniot period da se ovozmo`i vrabotuvawe na
sorabotnici na site predmeti. Vo me|uvreme bi mo`ele
sorabotnicite da "pomagaat" i okolu drugi srodni predmeti, {to e
praksa na pove}e fakulteti.
6. Akademskiot kadar gi zadovoluva potrebite vo odnos na nivnata
kompetentnost za vr{ewe na nastavno-obrazovnata i nau~noistra`uva~kata dejnost. Del od nastavnicite i sorabotnicite
objavuvaat trudovi vo periodi~ni publikacii. Samo mal del
objavuvaat vo spisanija so impakt faktor. Izborot na nastavnicite
i sorabotnicite vo nastavno-nau~ni zvawa e vo soglasnost so
univerzitetskite kriteriumi.
7. Pokrienosta na predmetite so nastavnici, vo najgolem broj slu~ai,
zadovoluva.
8. Realizacijata na predavawata, mentorskata i terenskata nastava
vo site studiski programi zadovoluva.
9. Fakultetot sorabotuva so pove}e fakulteti na Unniverzitetot i
ima nastavnici koi predavaat od drugi fakulteti. No mnogu malku
profesori od na{ata institucija se pokaneti na ostanatite
fakulteti. Smetame deka vo idnina toa treba da se promeni.
10. Me|unarodnata sorabotka so isti ili srodni fakulteti vo
stranstvo vo mometov postoi, no e na nisko nivo. Smetame deka vo
idnina istata bi trebalo da se intenzivira.
11. Vo odnos na osposobuvaweto na studentite smetame deka usmenata
komunikacija e na visoko nivo, no za `al ne se primenuva dovolno
stru~nata i nau~nata literatura, osobeno stranskata. Nastavata
treba da bide interaktivna i toj princip treba da se primenuva
pove}e. Komjuterskata tehnika i drugite sovremeni tehnologii se
primenuvaat vo izvesen stepen, no bi mo`elo da bide i poizrazeno.
12. Izborot na diplomska rabota, nejziniot kvalitet i zastapenosta
po predmeti i izborot na komisijata, ne zadovoluva sekoga{.
Zatoa, smetame deka toa treba da se korigira i vo idnina izborot
na tema za diplomska rabota, mentor i komisija za odbrana, da se
verifikuva na Nastavno-nau~en sovet.
13. Vo odnos na uspisite na novi studenti - treba da se prevzemat
pointenzivni aktivnosti i marketin{ki postapki so koi }e se
istaknuva vrednosta na ovie studii.
32
14. Fakultetot treba da prevzeme i aktivnosti za definirawe,
egzistencija i zakonodavno prifa}awe na nomenklaturata na
zvawata i zanimawata za koi Fakultetot izdava diplomi.
15. Fakultetot da bara od dr`avata da gi finansira rabotnite mesta
koi porano postoele, a sega se ukinati, kako: sekretar na
Fakultetot (diplomiran pravnik) i tehni~ki personal.
16. Materijalnite i prostornite uslovi na Fakultetot ne
zadovoluvaat. Fakultetot gi koristi site objekti za teoretska i
prakti~na nastava zaedno so Sportskata gimnazija (sredno
u~ili{te) i zaradi toa mora da raboti vo smeni, {to e
neprifatlivo za fakultetska ustanova. Brojot na amfiteatri,
sali i laboratorii, isto taka ne e dovolen ili izostanuva.
Ogromen problem za Fakultetot e salata koja ja donira{e
Agencijata za mladi i sport, bidej}i e izgradena bez parno greewe.
Zaradi toa Fakultetot ne mo`e da ja koristi vo zimskite meseci
za nastava, a ne mo`e nitu da ja izdava. Osven toa, istata ne e
priklu~ena na kanalizacija, pa i toa vo idnina }e bide problem.
Taka se soo~uvame so visoki smetki za nejzino odr`uvawe, od edna
strana, a od druga strana zaradi nejzinoto nepotopolno
opremuvawe ne mo`eme da ja izdavame, za da pokrieme del od
nejzinite tro{oci na toj na~in. Za ova ve}e e podneseno barawe do
Agencija za mladi i sport, koja se nadevame deka vo najbliska
idnina }e uspee da go re{i ovoj problem.
17. So ogled na toa {to pri izgradbata na novata sala, bea uni{teni
nekolku nadvore{ni objekti (igrali{te za ko{arka, rakomet,
fudbal i atletska pateka), podneseno e barawe do Agencijata za
mladi i sport za povtorna izgradba na nadvore{ni
multifunkcionalni objekti.
18. Vo odnos na opremata za nastavata - site nastavnici imaat svoi
komjuteri i printeri. Ima 4 vkupno LCD aparati i nekolku skeneri.
mo`ebi vo idnina treba da se razmisli i za druga oprema, koja na
vrabotenite na Fakultetot bi im ovozmo`ila podobra mo`nost za
istra`uva~ki proekti. Ima internet vo site kabineti.
19. Da se napravat napori i da se obezbedat sredstva za da se obnovi
postoe~kata, no i da se nabavi nova sovremena oprema, koja }e
mo`e da se koristi vo nau~no-istra`uva~kata rabota.
20. Bibliotekata ne povrzana so internet bibliotekite vo svetot i
nema mo`nost da se nara~uvaat knigi i spisanija. Vo idnina ova
treba da se promeni.
21. Zapo~nata e elektronska evidencija na studentite, elektronska
evidencija za ispitite, no samo vo prva godina. Istiot sistem
treba da se implementira i vo ostanatite godini, za [to treba ne
samo osovremenuvawe na Slu`bata za studentski pra{awa, tuku i
vreme.
22. Od site aktivnosti koi gi prevzemaat vrabotenite na Fakultetot
na rabotnoto mesto, treba da se odvojuva procent za Fakultetot,
kako odbrana na dimplomski i magisterski raboti i doktorati.
33
23. Finansiskite sredstva koi doa|aat na Fakultetot po razli~ni
osnovi, da se strogo namenski i da ostanuvaat vo oblasta od koj
do{le. Imeno, ako parite do{le od odbrana na diplomski raboti,
sredstvata koi }e se soberat po taa osnova da se koristat za
nastavata. Sredstvata od odbrana na magisterski raboti i
doktorati da se koristat za vtor i tret stepen studii (odnosno
obezbeduvawe oprema koja e potrebna za istra`uva~ka rabota).
24. Fakultetot da konkurira sam, no i so ostanatite srodni
fakulteti, za pove}e i razli~ni proekti, za da mo`e i na toj na~in
da se obezbedat sredstva za kupuvawe na oprema na Fakultetot i
steknuvawe na iskustvo vo odnos na istra`uva~kata rabota.
25. Da se postavi cel Fakultetot da organizira kongres i da se
napravi se {to treba za da taa cel se realizira, {to e mo`no
pobrgu.
26. Za svoite vraboteni Fakultetot da obezbeduva sredstva za
ednomese~en stru~en prestoj vo drugi srodni instiucii vo
stranstvo, zaradi razmena na iskustva, steknuvawe na novi
soznanija vo razli~ni oblasti i usovr{uvawe.
27. Da se baraat dopolnitelni ~asovi po fizi~ko i zdravstveno
obrazovanie (sekojdnevno) koi }e bidat protivte`a na
celodnevnoto sedewe na u~enicite vo u~ili{te.
28. Centarot za fizi~ko obrazovanie treba da vleze vo sostav na
Univerzitetskiot sportski centar ili nivnite vraboteni da se
preraspredelat na fakultetite kade {to predavaat.
29. Podnesen e ideen proekt i barawe za rekonstrukcija na
administrativnata zgrada do Ministerstvoto za obrazovanie
(Sektor za investicii). Vo bliska idnina se o~ekuva ova barawe da
se realizira ili vo smisol na rekonstrukcija na postoe~kiot
objekt ili vo smisol na izgradba na sosema na nova zgrada.
KOMISIJA ZA SAMOEVALUACIJA:
prof. d-r Daniela [ukova Stojmanovska - pretsedatel s.r.
prof. d-r Len~e Aleksovska Veli~kovska - ~len s.r.
prof. Robert Hristovski d-r - ~len s.r.
prof. d-r Vojo Nastevski - ~len s.r.
prof. d-r Orce Mitevski - ~len s.r.
student Rumen Ampovski - ~len s.r.
student Filip Masevski - ~len s.r.
34
SS. CYRIL AND METHODIUS
UNIVERSITY IN SKOPJE
FACULTY OF PHYSICAL EDUCATION
SELF-EVALUATION REPORT OF THE FACULTY OF
PHYSICAL EDUCATION FOR THE 2007-2012 PERIOD
Skopje, 2012
35
CONTENTS
1.INTRODUCTION..........................................................................................................36
2. FACULTY MISSION...................................................................................................36
3. TEACHING AND RESEARCH STAFF, ASSOCIATES, AND ADMINISTRATIVE
STAFF...............................................................................................................................37
3.1 Teaching and research staff and associates.................................................................37
3.2 About the Physical Education Centre....................................................................38
3.3. Administrative staff................................................................................................40
4. TEACHING AND EDUCATIONAL ACTIVITY........................................................40
4.1. Undergraduate studies.............................................................................................40
4.1.1. Characteristics of the study programmes.................................................................40
4.1.2. Structure of the study programmes.......................................................................43
4.1.2.1. Study programme for P.E. subject tuition or I cycle of academic studies in
Physical and Health Education........................................................................................43
4.1.2.2. Study programme for Sports or I cycle of professional studies for Sports
Coaches.....................................................................................................44
4.1.2.3. Study programme for 2-year sports education....................................................45
4.2. Postgraduate studies................................................................................................46
4.3. Doctoral studies......................................................................................................46
5. SPATIAL, MATERIAL AND TECHNICAL RESOURCES......................................47
5.1. Library...................................................................................................................48
5.2. Physical Education Centre........................................................................................49
5.3. Logistics.................................................................................................................49
6. STUDENTS...............................................................................................................49
6.1. Undergraduate studies..............................................................................................49
6.1.1. Student poll.........................................................................................................50
6.1.1.1. Being informed.................................................................................................50
6.1.1.2. Tuition attendance and activities during the semester.........................................51
6.1.1.3. Student opinion regarding subjects covered by the second-year study
programmes.........................................................................................................51
6.1.1.4. Time spent on studying......................................................................................51
6.1.1.5. Literature..........................................................................................................52
6.1.1.6. Students’ opinion about professors.......................................................................54
6.1.1.7. Opinion about the teaching assistants..................................................................55
6.1.1.8. Colloquia/tests............................................................................................57
6.1.1.9. Final examination..............................................................................................57
6.1.1.10. Students’ mobility............................................................................................59
6.2. Postgraduate studies (Master’s and specialised studies)............................................60
6.3. Doctoral studies......................................................................................................60
6.4. External collaboration..............................................................................................60
6.5. Research work..................................................................................................61
7. FINANCES..............................................................................................................62
8. CONCLUSIONS.......................................................................................................63
36
1. INTRODUCTION
This report contains internal self-evaluation, i.e. assessment of the work of the Faculty of
Physical Education, the professional teaching and research staff and, as well as its study
programmes after 2007, upon adopting the last Self-Evaluation Report.
The self-evaluation was conducted by the Committee on 14.04.2011, which was formed
upon the Decision No. 0201-289/16 by the Professors’ Board. The Committee consisted
of: prof. Daniela Šukova Stojmanovska, PhD – Chairperson, prof. Robert Hristovski,
PhD – member, prof. Vojo Nastevski, PhD – member, prof. Orce Mitevski, PhD –
member, Rumen Ampovski – student member, and Filip Masevski – student member.
The perspectives of the professors, associates, and the professional staff, as well as other
employees at the Faculty were taken into consideration for the needs and purposes of the
self-evaluation. Moreover, students took a poll in order to express their opinion regarding
the realisation of tuition, the type of tuition material and the way it is presented, the
professor/associate–student relationship, the manner of exam/colloquium realisation, and
the grade formation.
The Committee met several times with the purpose of composing a Report that was to
reflect the real situation.
2. FACULTY MISSION
The main mission of the Faculty is to create a healthy population of children and youths
that will not go astray (drug addiction, smoking, alcoholism), but rather be directed
towards physical activities and sports. In order to accomplish that, the Faculty has to
educate staff that will be qualified and that will serve as an example of health and better
quality life as a result of physical activities and sports, and also fewer diseases – not only
those associated with inactivity (fatness, deformities and disorders of the spinal column
and the feet), but also reducing the symptoms of other chronic diseases (diabetes,
hypertension, rheumatic diseases, osteoporosis, etc.). For the realisation of this mission,
the Faculty has to conduct the tuition for the existing undergraduate (I level) studies
within the two divisions of orientation – Physical and Health Education, and the
professional studies for Sports Coaches in various sports disciplines, postgraduate, and
doctoral studies in Kinesiology.
The second mission of the Faculty is to strive for opening new divisions at the Faculty,
such as: Kinesiotherapy, Recreation, Sports Management, Sports Law, Sports Journalism,
Physical and Health Education for Preschool and I-IV Grade Tuition, Health, etc., all in
order to make a more detailed orientation towards educating staff that will be qualified to
work within each scope. This will allow professionals who come out of the Faculty to
start working with children at their earliest age, mostly because they can contribute to the
correct development of children from their earliest age to the oldest population. In
37
addition, upon adopting those healthy habits, it is almost certain that children will exhibit
them until the rest of their lives.
The third mission of the Faculty is to start enforcing the Law on Sports, which provides
for work of cadres created only by the Faculty and who have the credentials to work
within this domain. Our country has 2000 sports clubs with uneducated and unqualified
employees who can do more harm than good for the children, youth, and adult sports
categories, but also in recreation.
The fourth mission is to establish mutual collaboration with other allied faculties in the
neighbourhood and in Europe, by participation in joint projects and student exchange, as
well as teaching and research staff exchange. Not only would this allow comparable
syllabi, but it would also train the teaching staff regarding the methods and manners of
realisation of tuition and exams. Furthermore, this would allow joint participation in
research projects as a reference point for comparison of results and determining the future
directions.
3.
TEACHING
AND
RESEARCH
ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF
STAFF,
ASSOCIATES,
AND
3.1 Teaching and research staff and associates
The Faculty of Physical Education in Skopje has 29 employees, 23 of which are
professors and 6 of them are associates. 17 of them are full professors, 6 are associate
professors, 1 is a teaching assistant with a doctoral degree, 5 are regular assistants, and 1
is a junior assistant. Moreover, the Faculty has additional teaching staff composed of 4
teachers from other faculties. There are only 4 female professors and 2 female teaching
assistants.
As for age frame of the teaching staff at the Faculty of Physical Education, there is one
professor who retired at the beginning of this academic year, and the second one retired
in January. Their teaching subjects are taken over by associates, who can take over the
responsibilities as well. However, there are no teaching assistants for every subject,
which is a bad indication of the number of associates per professor. The number of
associates per professor should be one, which would mean that each professor should
have one associate. The University indicator ranges from 1.5 to 4 (the Faculty of
Medicine is an exception, with an indicator of 0.5). The indicator at the Faculty of
Physical Education is approximately 4, meaning that the condition at our faculty is
identical with several faculties within the Ss. Cyril and Methodius University in Skopje.
Our teaching assistants are engaged only in one subject and they do not get involved in
tuition (practical or theoretical) in other subjects. For this reason, there is a work overload
of the professor not having associates, because they are left on their own resourcefulness
regarding the theoretical and practical lectures, the overall keeping records of student
38
attendance in lectures, their activities during the lectures, the activities in relation to
choosing a topic for seminar paper and its elaboration, and keeping records in relation to
taking exams and colloquia. If we take into account the fact that some of the professors
teach two subjects, it can easily be concluded that they are overloaded with work.
According to the Rulebook on the Table of Norms and Standards for Conducting Higher
Education Profession, professors should teach 8 lectures per week, whereas associates
should teach 14 lectures per week, and this criterion is implemented by the Faculty of
Physical Education.
Furthermore, the professors and associates are not only involved in tuition – they are also
involved in research work (participation in congresses, symposia, projects). Thus, we
have to emphasise that this restrictive policy of not employing young staff within the
University should be corrected and that the projected period should allow employment of
associates for each subject. Meanwhile, the existing associates could provide some “help”
with the allied subjects, which is a common practice at many faculties.
With the Decision No. 0201-380/6 on 12.05.2011 by the Professors’ Board, it was
decided that the associates whose subject is in the graduate domain could take part in the
committees for graduate affairs. This allows for their more intensive involvement in
research work and in the professional aspects of each subject.
Also, the implementation of ECTS at the Faculty asks for additional engagement of the
teaching and associate staff. The slow-paced innovation and the aging of the teaching
staff can pose a problem for the quality implementation of ECTS in future, as well as for
the postgraduate and doctoral studies, and the research work.
3.2 About the Physical Education Centre
Since 1992, the Faculty includes the Physical Education Centre with 1 professor with an
associate’s degree, 10 senior lecturers, and 1 lecturer. The Centre realises Physical
Education and Sports Activities tuition for students at all the faculties within the Ss. Cyril
and Methodius University, except for the students at the Faculty of Physical Education.
Despite the fact that this kind of tuition is to be realised each academic year during the
overall academic education, practice has shown that it is only realised in the first year of
studies. The problem lies in the fact that tuition is held in rented sports facilities, which
entails money payment. Unfortunately, the faculties do not make the payment for the
tuition, so, in our opinion, the Ss. Cyril and Methodius University in Skopje, or, more
precisely, the Rector’s Office should make more efforts to make the faculties pay for the
tuition held for their students.
Furthermore, in the past several years, some of the faculties did not conduct this type of
tuition at all and students at their home faculties were granted signatures for attending
tuition by their professors instead of by professors from the Physical Education Centre.
39
Most likely, the underlying reason for this situation is that, as mentioned before, each
faculty is obliged to pay for the tuition. Thus, in an attempt to avoid that, they charged
their students a smaller amount of money (amount intended for their own faculties) and
gave students the needed signatures.
We hope that in future the University will take measures in order to alleviate this
situation and that it will make sure each faculty pays for the tuition in Physical Education
and Sports, because for the past several years, there were times when the Faculty of
Physical Education (since the Physical Education Centre is not a legal entity)
simultaneously was a service provider (Physical Education and Sports tuition) and a
financier for the students of the entire University whose syllabus provided for this type of
tuition. Hence, for the past eight years, the Faculty of Physical Education has been facing
enormous financial difficulties, so, one more time, we must emphasise that the University
with its members, via the competent authorities, has to come to a solution for covering
the financial liabilities in order to have a successful realisation of the tuition in Physical
Education and Sports.
These financial difficulties of the Faculty of Physical Education caused by the Centre
resulted in an initiative for disunion with the Physical Education Centre, upon the
decision No. 1201-1220 on 03.12.2008 by the Professors’ Board at the Faculty of
Physical Education. Unfortunately, this disunion never took place. The Law on Higher
Education (The Official Gazette No. 35/08) did not provide for existence of the Centre,
but a University Sports Centre. In 2010, the Physical Education Centre was included in
the Rulebook of the Faculty, which pointed out their rights and obligations, but only until
a permanent solution was found. Namely, not being able to provide facilities and
materials for including the Centre within the Faculty, the Rulebook provides for the
Ministry of Education to cover them. Thereto, in order to find a definite solution, the
other body that has to help is the Rector’s Office at the Ss. Cyril and Methodius
University in Skopje. There are two possibilities: 1) transformation of the Physical
Education Centre into a University Sports Centre, and 2) each faculty to take one
professor from the Centre, who will realise tuition in Physical Education and Sports at
that faculty. Both options are good if one takes into account that the state already pays for
those work positions, so the only real change would be the redeployment of the teaching
staff.
For the time being, the professors from the Centre do not have the needed facilities at
their disposal, so they conduct tuition at the Faculty of Mechanical Engineering in
Skopje.
40
3.3. Administrative staff
The administrative staff at the Faculty of Physical Education is consisted of professional
and administrative technical staff. Four of them have completed higher education, 1 has
completed post-secondary education, 9 of them have completed high school, and 2 of
them have completed primary school. Eleven of them hold work positions financed by
the state, whereas five of them are paid from our own finances.
Regarding this issue, we must point out that, technically, there have not been new work
positions at the Faculty in the previous few years. This is a real problem, since some of
the positions are paid for with our own assets. For example, the Faculty and the Centre
had a legal secretary (altogether two) paid by the state, without whom the Faculty could
not work. In addition, their competencies and obligations, as well as the manner of their
election are regulated by law. Despite the fact that one of the abovementioned secretaries
is retired and the other one is deceased, no financial assets are provided for the legal
secretary (currently only one), so this position is paid for with our own finances. We
sincerely hope that the state authorities will resolve this problem and that, in future, they
will provide assets for this work position.
Moreover, there is also a problem with the technical personnel, because two genitors
have retired in the past couple of years, and their vacancies are not financed by the state;
hence they are paid with our own assets, too. The need for these work positions is highly
emphasised, mostly because of the specificity of the tuition in Physical Education at the
Faculty, which is conducted in classrooms and sports halls.
4. TEACHING AND EDUCATIONAL ACTIVITY
4.1. Undergraduate studies
4.1.1. Characteristics of the study programmes
The Faculty of Physical Education has two undergraduate study programmes, which are,
to a certain measure, compatible with the allied faculties in our neighbourhood (Serbia,
Croatia, Slovenia, Monte Negro, and Bulgaria). The first division of professional
orientation is Physical Education, i.e. I cycle of studies, whereas the second division is
Sports, i.e. professional studies for Sports Coaches. The first educates future P.E.
teachers, and the latter educates sports coaches for a certain sports discipline.
I cycle of academic studies in Physical and Health Education has been accredited since
the foundation of the Faculty in 1977. The division was reformed in 1988, 2000, and
2010, being realised pursuant to the Decision on Accreditation of Amendments of I Cycle
of Academic Studies in Physical and Health Education at the Faculty of Physical
Education at Ss. Cyril and Methodius University in Skopje, No. 12-116/4 on 22.10.2010,
41
and the Decision on Initialisation No. 13-1570/1 on 08.03.2011 of I Cycle of Academic
Studies in Physical and Health Education at the Faculty of Physical Education at Ss. Cyril
and Methodius University in Skopje. Since 2009/2010, these studies have been conducted
with a new study programme and a new subject programme (one-semester programme)
according to the European Credit Transfer and Accumulation System (ECTS). The last
modification of this study programme according to the requirements set by the University
is in progress, and is in relation to the possibility each student to attend tuition in subjects
from other faculties (up to 10 per cent of the total number of classes). Regarding the last
modification, there is a Decision by the Professors’ Board at the Faculty of Physical
Education No. 0201-73/11 on 01.02.2012 on adoption of the project proposal for
amendments of the 4-year university studies in P.E. at the Faculty of Physical Education.
It has been agreed upon by the Rector’s Head Office and the Senate of the Ss. Cyril and
Methodius University in Skopje and it will be delivered to the Accreditation Board.
Accreditation is expected, mostly because the amendments in comparison with the
previous one (the accredited study programme) are minimal and are in relation to the
readjustments required by the Ss. Cyril and Methodius University in Skopje. As it was
mentioned earlier, this division educates P.E. teachers. Tuition is realised in 8 semesters.
Since 2001/2002 the Faculty of Physical Education works with the second division of
orientation – Sports, i.e. I cycle of studies for sports coaches. There is a Decision on
Accreditation of I Cycle of Professional Studies for Sports Coaches at the Faculty of
Physical Education at Ss. Cyril and Methodius University in Skopje, No. 12-75/3 on
20.12.2011. The Decision on Initialisation of I Cycle of Professional Studies for Sports
Coaches at the Faculty of Physical Education at Ss. Cyril and Methodius University in
Skopje is with No. 13-848/1 from 01.02.2012. The last modification of this study
programme according to the requirements set by the University is in progress, and is in
relation to the possibility each student to attend tuition in subjects from other faculties (up
to 10 per cent of the total number of classes). Regarding this last modification, there is a
Decision by the Professors’ Board at the Faculty of Physical Education No. 0201-73/12
on 01.02.2012 on adopting the project proposal for amendments of the 3-year
professional studies for Sports Coaches at the Faculty of Physical Education. It has been
agreed upon by the Rector’s Head Office and the Senate of the Ss. Cyril and Methodius
University in Skopje and it will be delivered to the Accreditation Board. Accreditation is
expected, mostly because the amendments in comparison with the previous one (the
accredited study programme) are minimal and are in relation to the readjustments
required by the Ss. Cyril and Methodius University in Skopje. Thereto, we must highlight
the unselfish efforts of the new Dean’s Office to fulfil all the new criteria and to make the
necessary corrections of the existing study programme, all in order to obtain the
accreditation.
42
This division educates coaches for a certain sports discipline. In this respect, it is
necessary to start enforcing the Law on Sports, under which all the coaches who work in
the sports domain are required to have proper education. Tuition is realised in 6
semesters.
Besides the existing programmes, the Faculty also has undergraduate programmes for
Physical Education in preschool and I-IV grade tuition. The Faculty intends to seek their
accreditation in the foreseeable future.
In 1998, the Faculty started educating coaches of a certain sports discipline, but with
post-secondary education (study programmes with 4 semesters). This programme existed
until 2000, when the law abolished post-secondary institutions.
Since 1988, there also exists consent by the Ss. Cyril and Methodius University in Skopje
and the competent department for education regarding study programmes in
Kinesiotherapy and Physical Education and Recreation; however, their realisation has not
been started yet. Perhaps we should make a formal request to the Accreditation Board.
The Faculty applies the principle of interdisciplinary study programmes. Thus, there are
four professors teaching at the Faculty of Physical Education, but who come from
different home faculties: 2 of them are from the Faculty of Medicine, 1 is from the
Faculty of Pedagogy, and 1 is from the Institute of Defence. Nonetheless, the general
impression is that although there are many subjects at the other faculties that are allied to
the subjects from our Faculty, our professors are not asked to teach there, so there is no
reciprocity. Perhaps we are talking about ignorance; still, this situation should be changed
in future. Furthermore, despite the fact that all the faculties reached consensus on
inclusion of the Sports and Sports Activities subject, it is not the case at many faculties,
because they do not implement this subject and students are given signatures for
attendance by their home professors instead of the professors from our Faculty. This
practice should also be put to an end because tuition must be conducted by professionals.
In addition, financing of the professors who teach at our Faculty but come from different
faculties, falls on the back of the Faculty, which is calculated with a formula.
Unfortunately, there is no reciprocity, again. Some faculties within the Ss. Cyril and
Methodius University in Skopje pay for the tuition in Sports and Sports Activities;
however, the same formula and the same principle as when we are charged for services
are not followed. Thus, we consider that the Faculty of Physical Education is in unequal
position. We hope that in the foreseeable future this irregularity will be corrected and that
the same principle will be applied for each faculty within the University.
The web page of the Faculty of Physical Education exists for many years, but it was not
updated with new information. At the beginning of this academic year, the new Dean’s
43
Office insisted on its proper reactivation. Now, it is completely redesigned and is updated
on a daily basis with new information needed by students.
We must mention that this year the Rector’s Office allocated funds for formation of
University Sports Leagues in basketball, handball, football, and volleyball, in which
every faculty will take part. This is a real sports promotion. The competitions will take
place in the new sports hall of the Faculty of Physical Education. Regarding the fact that
the overall organisation of these leagues will be taken over by our faculty, we hope that
we will justify your trust.
4.1.2. Structure of the study programmes
This year (2012), the Faculty of Physical Education is working on composition of a
Rulebook on Studying I Cycle of Studies and Study Guidebook, which are in the final
stage and soon to be put into operation. These documents regulate the rights, liabilities,
and opportunities of the students from both divisions of orientation at the Faculty of
Physical Education.
4.1.2.1. Study programme for P.E. subject tuition or I cycle of academic studies in
Physical and Health Education
Currently, there are two student generations studying I cycle of academic studies in
Physical and Health Education at the Faculty of Physical Education. Those are students
enrolled in 2004/2005 and are now third and fourth-year students, and the students
enrolled in 2009/2010, who are first or second-year students in 2010/2011.
Table 1. I cycle of academic studies in Physical and Health Education
Generation
enrolled in
Academic year
2009/2010
2004/2005
Total of subjects
1
2
3
4
Mandatory
subjects
7
7
12
12
38
Elective
subjects
3
2
2
2
9
Optional
subjects
/
/
2
2
4
The table shows that, at the Faculty of Physical Education, this division covers 47
subjects during 4-year studies and 2 programmes – the old one with two-semester
subjects and the new one with one-semester subjects. Considering the number of subjects
according to the new study programme (first and second year), there are 14 mandatory
(or 50%) and 5 elective (or 25%) subjects. The most recent updating of the syllabi was in
2009/2010, when all the subjects were changed into one-semester subjects, of course, in
44
accordance with ECTS. Special care was taken not to overload students with subject
material (60 credits per semester). In addition, there are 9 elective subjects, all in order to
meet students’ different affinities. Although there are many electives, it is impossible to
organise tuition for a few students in several groups (according to their affinities),
because there are not enough premises. For almost every subject (with smaller
exceptions) grading is done by colloquia, seminar papers, and other forms of tasks which
are different for every subject, which alleviates taking examinations. The process of
introduction of Diploma supplement is in progress.
What must be emphasised is that some subjects, mostly the optional ones, are taught by
persons whose election is not in accordance with the acts for teaching staff election.
The number of theoretical and practical lectures for P.E. study programme is satisfactory.
In addition, students are given the opportunity to exhibit special interests in a certain
subject by elaborating seminar papers and by consultation.
However, there is a lack of materials for tuition modernisation with diagnostic methods
and procedures – materials which are currently impossible to be provided by the Faculty
of Physical Education.
This study programme is realised by 23 professors and 6 teaching assistants.
4.1.2.2. Study programme for Sports or I cycle of professional studies for Sports
Coaches
There are currently two student generations at this division at the Faculty. The fist one
enrolled in 2004/2005 (now third or fourth year students), whereas the second one
enrolled in 2009/2010 (in 2010/2011 academic year - first or second year students).
According to the new programme (with one-semester subjects), this division covers 21
subjects, out of which 18 are mandatory and 2 are electives. The old study programme
(with two-semester subjects) covers 48 mandatory, 8 elective, and 8 optional subjects.
The most recent updating of the syllabi was in 2009/2010, when all the subjects were
changed into one-semester subjects, of course, in accordance with ECTS. Special care
was taken not to overload students with subject material (60 credits per semester). In
addition, there are 9 elective subjects, all in order to meet different affinities of the
students. Although there are many electives, it is impossible to organise tuition for fewer
students in several groups (according to their affinities), because there are not enough
premises. For almost every subject (with smaller exceptions) grading is done by
colloquia, seminar papers, and other forms of tasks which are different for every subject,
which alleviates taking examinations. The process of introduction of Diploma
supplement is in progress.
45
The most important thing is that most of the teaching staff at this division is actively
engaged in sports, working as sports club coaches, or as selectors of national teams for
various sports in the Republic of Macedonia, which only adds to the importance of this
division.
What must be emphasised is that some subjects, mostly the optional ones, are taught by
persons whose election is not in accordance with the acts for teaching staff election.
Table 2. I cycle of professional studies for Sports Coaches
Generation
enrolled in
Academic year
2009/2010
2004/2005
Total of subjects
1
2
3
4
Mandatory
subjects
9
9
12
12
42
Elective
subjects
2
/
2
2
6
Optional
subjects
/
/
2
2
4
The number of theoretical and practical lectures for P.E. study programme is satisfactory.
In addition, students are given the opportunity to exhibit special interests in a certain
subject by elaborating seminar papers and by consultation. In addition, very often
students from this division realise the practical tuition with direct participation in
organisation of training processes in sports clubs. They also participate in analyses of
training sessions and competitions, which presents precious experience from their studies.
However, there is a lack of materials for tuition modernisation with diagnostic methods
and procedures – materials which are currently impossible to be provided by the Faculty
of Physical Education.
There are 22 professors and 6 teaching assistants at this division; since there are many
sports in which other professors are involved, we can say that almost all of the teaching
staff teach at this division.
4.1.2.3. Study programme for 2-year sports education
This study programme was initialised in 1998 and dealt with educating prospect
professionals – coaches in certain sports discipline (or post-secondary sports coaches).
This division comprised almost the same subjects as the sports division, only with smaller
volume and contents. Students were involved in analyses and organisation of sports
competitions at lower ranks.
46
4.2. Postgraduate studies
Since 1991/1992, the Faculty of Physical Education has incessantly conducted
postgraduate studies (Master’s and specialised studies). The specialised studies are
realised as study programmes for certain sports disciplines or certain subjects in which
students express their special interest, and are conducted according to a mentor’s system.
The Master’s studies are organised on the basis of Consent by the Ss. Cyril and
Methodius University in Skopje and the Ministry of Education and Science. In 2000, new
subject programmes were created for both types of studies. There was Consent by the Ss.
Cyril and Methodius University in Skopje, but not by the Ministry of Education and
Science. The last modification of the syllabi for the Master’s studies was made in
2010/2011 and was in accordance with ECTS and continual studying. There is a Decision
on Accreditation of the Study Programme for II Cycle of University Studies (Master’s
Studies in Kinesiology) at the Faculty of Physical Education at Ss. Cyril and Methodius
University in Skopje No. 12-98/8 on 11.11.2011. The Decision on Initialisation of the
Study Programme for II Cycle of University Studies (Master’s Studies in Kinesiology) at
the Faculty of Physical Education at Ss. Cyril and Methodius University in Skopje No.
13-847/1 was brought on 01.02.2011.
The last generation of postgraduate students is from the academic year 2008/2009, when
11 candidates enrolled in these studies.
Our Faculty is currently collaborating with the Faculty of Economics at Ss. Cyril and
Methodius University in Skopje regarding establishment of a new division of orientation
for II cycle of studies – Sports Management, with professors from both faculties (the
Faculty of Physical Education and the Faculty of Economics). This process is in the final
stage and is expected to be ready for submission to the Accreditation Board in order to
obtain accreditation and initialisation decision.
At the moment, the Faculty of Physical Education is under negotiation with the Faculty
of Medicine in Skopje in relation to organising a new joint study programme for II cycle
of academic studies in Kinesiotherapy.
We hope that in the foreseeable future, the Faculty will offer more divisions of
professional orientation at postgraduate studies, such as: Recreation, Sports Law, Sports
Journalism, Health, etc.
4.3. Doctoral studies
Within 2010/2011, the Faculty created a new study programme for doctoral studies in
accordance with ECTS. This III cycle of studies (doctoral studies) has been decided upon
by the University Senate. It was the Decision on Adoption of a Project for Introduction of
47
a Study Programme for III Cycle of Doctoral Studies in Kinesiology No. 02-533/2,
brought on 08.07.2010.
Regarding the above-mentioned, a formal request has been made and sent to the
Accreditation Board and we are waiting for consent.
5. SPATIAL, MATERIAL AND TECHNICAL RESOURCES
The premises or the space conditions at the Faculty of Physical Education in Skopje
partially meet the needs, primarily because they are shared with the Metodi Mitevski –
Brico Sports Gymnasium. For that reason, the Faculty tuition is held in two shifts. The
condition is additionally complicated because there are not any time slots for students to
be able to exercise and master practical lectures. It would be much easier if the Faculty
had only one shift of work. The total area of lecture rooms, sports halls, teaching staff
offices, as well as the Physical Education Centre is 5362 m2. The allocated area per
student does not meet the criteria in respect to quality of material and technical
conditions.
The new Dean’s Office has been trying to find solution to this problem by sending a draft
and a petition for reconstruction of the administrative building to the Ministry of
Education and Science (Sector of Investments). We expect to have a fast realisation of
our petition by reconstructing the existing facility or by building a completely new
facility.
For the purposes of conducting tuition, the Faculty uses two lecture halls from other
institutions (but only for tuition at the Faculty of Medicine) and a swimming pool. Taking
into account that the Faculty of Physical Education has to pay for their use, it only
aggravates the current financial situation.
The Youth and Sports Agency and the Ministry of Education and Science have built a
new sports hall for the Faculty. Unfortunately, it cannot be used throughout the entire
year because it does not have any heating, so it is impossible to hold lectures under those
conditions, especially in winter. Regarding the difficult financial situation due to the debt,
the Faculty has not been able to provide those heating conditions from its own assets. On
this account, the Faculty of Physical Education has made a request to the Youth and
Sports Agency, hoping that it will provide us with the needed financial assets in the
nearest future and the Faculty of Physical Education will be able to hold lectures and
organise a University Sports League.
Prior to construction of the sports hall, the Faculty had an outdoor playground for
basketball, volleyball, handball, and football, as well as a running track, which were
destroyed during the construction. On this account, the Faculty of Physical Education has
48
made a request to the Youth and Sports Agency for reconstruction of the outdoor
multifunctional facilities, thus creating better study conditions.
Moreover, the Faculty is not in possession of a proper lecture hall. Tuition is held in
classrooms, or when the number of students is higher, in an adapted gym often too small
for all the students. For this reason, when all the students attend theoretical lectures, it is
hard to have proper learning conditions.
The material and technical conditions at the Faculty are also unsatisfactory, only partially
meeting the needs for teaching and research work. Namely, each professor at the Faculty
has their own computer, or lap-top used in tuition. All the computers are connected to the
Internet as well as in a work network. Moreover, the Faculty has 4 LCD projectors and
several scanners, also used in tuition. However, it is our obligation to point out that the
Faculty does not have any modern apparatuses and software used worldwide for better
diagnostics of athlete’s condition, or for monitoring their physical status. Thus, we are
making efforts to update the existing equipment and to procure new one.
Because of the new criteria under the Law on Higher Education, the state authorities
should provide more assets for the purpose of research work, thus allowing more
professors and associates to take part in projects, congresses, and symposia which are
held abroad. We must also emphasise the importance of staff exchange (professors and
associates) with allied foreign faculties.
Taking into consideration the fact that the campus of the Faculty of Physical Education is
located in the city centre, common practice was the parking lot to be overcrowded with
vehicles belonging to people who live in proximity to the Faculty, as well as with
employees from surrounding institutions. This led to minor or major damages to the
parked vehicles. Nevertheless, this year the Faculty managed to put an end to this practice
by providing an electronic gate, so external people cannot park their vehicles at the
parking lot.
5.1. Library
There are over 4000 books in the library. Unfortunately, this number seems to be small,
and the choice comes down to books in Macedonian and Serbian language; there are only
a few books by foreign authors and a few books from the modern literature. The library is
not included in an electronic system of book exchange on a national or international
level, so we cannot order any books. Employees are not informed about procurement of
new books. The library does not have any computer programmes for finding library data,
nor does it have programmes for transfer of bibliographic information. The number of
foreign learned periodicals is also insignificant. There is no copy machine in the library.
A great number of professors have published learning materials (books, lecture notes,
49
practice supplements) for their students to be able to learn, so they can be found in the
library.
The Faculty should also have a bookshop in future, so that students could buy a certain
book there and not directly from the professor.
5.2. Physical Education Centre
The Physical Education Centre (which is not a legal entity) also holds tuition in rented
facilities, for which the Faculty of Physical Education, being a legal entity, is obliged to
pay. For the time being, the Centre holds tuition in the hall of the Faculty of Mechanical
Engineering.
The Ss. Cyril and Methodius University in Skopje intends to transform the Physical
Education Centre into University Sports Centre. To be able to do that, the University has
started constructing a university hall for the future University Sports Centre, where all its
activities shall take place. Premises for employees from the Centre are projected to be
situated in this site, too.
5.3. Logistics
The Student Services Office is not well organised, primarily because it has not been
modernised. Namely, there are 2 computers in the office, but up to now there have not
been any programmes for keeping records in data base for each study programme and for
each academic year. However, this situation is currently being changed, above all
because of the effectiveness of the Law on Higher Education under which all the faculties
are to introduce electronic record keeping for the teaching and administrative staff, as
well as for students. For these reasons, the iKnow System has started with a successful
implementation regarding both divisions, so students, professors and teaching assistants
are able to have a closer look into all the information in reference to tuition,
examinations, and Faculty liabilities. This is an important step towards updating the
services and now every student will have their own electronic records regarding every
single examination for every single year. There are three employees in the student
services, so the needs are met.
6. STUDENTS
6.1. Undergraduate studies
In the academic year of 2010/2011 at the P.E. Division, 258 students enrolled or, more
precisely, 108 students enrolled in first year, 61 in second year, 38 in third year, and 51 in
fourth year of studies. Out of them, 241 are full-time students and 17 are part-time
students. In addition, 138 students are in the state quota, whereas 103 are self-financing.
50
Table 3. Academic studies in Physical and Health Education
Year
1
2
3
4
Total
Full-time students
State quota
Self-financing
51
45
36
23
24
13
27
22
138
103
Part-time
students
12
2
1
2
17
Total
108
61
38
51
258
Table 4. Professional studies for Sports Coaches
Full-time students
Part-time
Total
students
State quota
Self-financing
1
/
/
25
25
2
28
4
4
36
3
23
8
8
39
4
17
11
6
34
Total
68
23
43
134
The final-year generation counts 21 state quota students, 45 self-financing students, and
12 part-time students.
Year
At the moment, the Sports Coaches Division counts 134 students or, more precisely, 25
first-year students, 36 second-year students, 39 third-year students, and 34 fourth-year
students. Out of them, 91 are full-time students, whereas 43 are part-time students.
Moreover, 68 students are enrolled in the state quota, and 66 are enrolled by selffinancing. The final-year generation counts 34 students, 17 of them are self-financing and
9 are part-time students.
6.1.1. Student poll
For the needs of the Self-evaluation Committee, amongst other things, an anonymous
student poll has been carried out. It contained 44 questions and was conducted on 57
second-year students.
6.1.1.1. Being informed
The majority of the students who took the poll (86%) are well informed about the
divisions at the Faculty of Physical Education. Only 7% of the students are not properly
informed and another 7% of the students are partially acquainted with the possibilities of
studying at this Faculty.
51
6.1.1.2. Tuition attendance and activities during the semester
The majority of students regularly attend theoretical lectures (86%) and 98% regularly
attend practical lectures in each subject.
6.1.1.3. Student opinion regarding subjects covered by the second-year study
programmes
Based on the results obtained from the poll, we can say that 56% of the students find the
tuition interesting and 30% find it difficult. A great part of the students can keep up with
the tuition, which probably means that they have the fundamental knowledge from high
school serving as a basis for upgrading future knowledge. However, 30% of the students
find it difficult to follow. It is most likely that the reason lies in the fact that there are
some subjects covering various domains with their own specificities, or maybe it is
because secondary schools have not provided students with the necessary knowledge.
Perhaps in future, there should be other methods and means of presentation of the
teaching material students find difficult.
Table 5. Student opinion regarding subjects covered by the second-year study
programmes
Subjects
are
Per cent
of
students
Interesting
Difficult
Necessary
Boring
Unnecessary
Easy
56%
30%
7%
5%
2%
/
Within possibilities of the financial framework of the Faculty, assets should be provided
for additional procurement of apparatuses which would make the teaching material
easier. Only 7% of the students think that that second-year subjects are boring or
unnecessary.
6.1.1.4. Time spent on studying
Students from the Ss. Cyril and Methodius University in Skopje spend an average of 2 to
5 hours per day on studying. At the Faculty of Physical Education, 51% of the students
study from 1 to 3 hours, which is similar to the time calculated for all the University
students. Despite the fact that 30% of the students at the Faculty of Physical Education
find the subjects difficult (see Table 5), only 7% of the students study from 3 to 5 hours
per day and 42% of them study for less than an hour a day, which means that the tuition
at the Faculty is on a higher level and, on the other hand, a great deal of students are
notable athletes, so the difficult material is easier for them.
52
Table 6. How much time do students spend on everyday studying?
Hours per day
Less than an
hour
1-3 hours
3-5 hours
More than 5
hours
Per cent of
students
42%
51%
7%
/
For more than one half of the University students, it takes an average of more than 5 days
to prepare for a colloquium or test and for 1/3 it takes 3 days. At the Faculty of Physical
Education, for 39% of the students it takes 3 -5 days and for 22% it takes 5-7 days. Only
for 16% it takes less than 3 days, for 14% it takes more than 10 days to prepare for
colloquium or examination.
Table 7. How many days does it take students to prepare for colloquium?
How many
days
Per cent of
students
Less than 3
days
3-5 days
5-7 days
7-10 days
More than
10 days
16%
39%
22%
9%
14%
For 37% of the students at the Ss. Cyril and Methodius University in Skopje, it takes 15
days to get ready for a final examination, and the same figure (37%) goes for students
who need 30 days for preparation. At the Faculty of Physical Education, 79% of the
students need less than 15 days to prepare for the final examination and 21% of them
need more than 15 days. It takes less than 5 days for 16% of the students.
Table 8. How many days does it take students to prepare for final examination?
How many days
Less than 5
days
5-10 days
10-15 days
More than 15
days
Per cent of
students
16%
39%
24%
21%
6.1.1.5. Literature
When it comes to literature for the second-year subjects, the poll shows that 64% of the
students use original books by their professors or by other authors, 54% use copies of
books and textbooks, 30% use notes taken during lectures, and only 10% use electronic
books. We must note that the total per cent is higher because a student can use different
forms of literature for several subjects.
53
Table 9. What kind of literature do second-year students at the Faculty of Physical
Education use?
Literature used
Original books
Copies
Notes taken
during lectures
Electronic
books
Per cent of
students
60%
54%
30%
10%
Furthermore, 39% of the students consider that the literature is comprehensible, 44%
consider that it is only partially comprehensible, and 17% consider that it is not
comprehensible at all. Up to 61% consider that the literature is in accordance with
lectures, 30% consider that it is partially in accordance with lectures, and 7% consider
that it is not in accordance with lectures at all.
Speaking of literature, we must note that the overall University system of literature has a
weakness, for which a solution should be found (on a University level) – solution that
will coordinate the needs of both students and professors. So, what seems to be the
problem?
Namely, on one hand, students require professors to publish more textbooks, which
would be coordinated with lectures and they would be in Macedonian, so studying would
be easier and faster. Although students acknowledge the advantages, some of them still
do not want to buy the textbooks (on a University level, only 15% of the students do),
some copy them (on a University level, up to 73% do that), or some of them borrow
books because they consider that upon having taken the examination, they will not be in
need of the textbooks anymore (which is not the case).
On the other hand, professors are not stimulated to write books and textbooks because
there is no copyright protection. More precisely, although it is punishable by law to have
original materials copied, no actions have been taken so far (despite the regulations
regarding this issue).
As for book price, we must note that a small portion is too high (therefore must be
corrected, upon a suggestion by the home faculty or the University). Still, most of the
books have a more reasonable price, which again, many students find not being low
enough. It is as if professors’ hard work is not taken into account and the book is valued
according to the paper needed for printing, not by the significance of the contents.
54
6.1.1.6. Students’ opinion about professors
Table 10. Students’ opinion about second-year professors at the Faculty of Physical
Education
Professors (are)
Per cent of
students who
gave positive
answers
Per cent of
students who
gave negative
answers
Per cent of
students whose
answer was
‘’partially’’
Regular in
lectures
Comprehensible
in lectures
Well prepared
for lectures
Stimulate
interaction
72%
65%
79%
63%
5%
2%
2%
12%
10%
28%
21%
26%
Table 10 (continues)
Professors (are)
Per cent of students
who gave positive
answers
Per cent of students
who gave negative
answers
Per cent of students
whose answer was
‘’partially’’
Have fair treatment
Available for office
hours
Respectful of
students’ opinion
68%
56%
53%
5%
12%
9%
25%
32%
38%
According to the poll results from second-year students, 72% of the students consider that
professors hold their lectures regularly, 79% think that professors are well prepared for
their lectures, and 65% consider that professors are comprehensible in lectures. Most of
the teaching staff exhibit fair treatment (68%) and encourage interaction (63%), but
hardly half of them are available for office hours (56%). This condition is similar to the
condition at Ss. Cyril and Methodius University in Skopje.
55
We must note that, first and foremost, professors should fulfil their work obligations and
to be regular regarding lectures. Besides, they should make more efforts to be more
intelligible during lectures or, if possible, to use other means and methods of presentation
of the more difficult material.
And last, but not least, teacher-student communication must be improved and the office
hours should help students internalise the new material. It is most likely that most of the
professors have conservative points of view, so it is harder for them to accept students’
opinion (53%).
Table 11. Students’ opinion about second-year tuition at the Faculty of Physical
Education
Professors’
lectures are
Per cent of
students
Interesting
Useful
Uninteresting
Boring
31%
57%
5%
7%
Up to 88% of the students find the second-year lectures interesting or useful, whereas
only 5% find them uninteresting and 7% find them boring.
6.1.1.7. Opinion about the teaching assistants
Teaching assistants at Ss. Cyril and Methodius University in Skopje are more regular
regarding holding tuition than professors, their practical lectures are more
comprehensible for students than theoretical lectures, they have shown to have better
communication with students, and they are more available for office hours.
Unfortunately, the results obtained from the poll show that at the Faculty of Physical
Education, the situation is reversed, which means that the professors are the ones that are
more reliable when it comes to regular lectures, readiness, and comprehensiveness. In
students’ opinion, it is the professors who encourage interaction, exhibit fair treatment,
and are respectful of students’ opinion (53%) in comparison with the teaching assistants
(49%) and are as much available for office hours (56%) as are the teaching assistants
(60%).
In conclusion, we must say that the teaching assistants must try harder when it comes to
tuition (regular lectures, readiness, and comprehensiveness), as well as with their
relationship with students, or their communication with the younger colleagues (in terms
of office hours and opinion exchange).
56
Table 12. Students’ opinion about second-year assistants at the Faculty of Physical
Education
Teaching
assistants (are)
Per cent of
students who
gave positive
answers
Per cent of
students who
gave negative
answers
Per cent of
students whose
answer was
‘’partially’’
Regular in
lectures
Comprehensible
in lectures
Well prepared
for lectures
Stimulate
interaction
68%
60%
70%
56%
7%
20%
4%
14%
25%
20%
26%
30%
Table 12 (continues)
Teaching assistants
Available for office
Respectful of
Have fair treatment
(are)
hours
students’ opinion
Per cent of students
who gave positive
61%
60%
49%
answers
Per cent of students
who gave negative
14%
10%
12%
answers
Per cent of students
whose answer was
25%
30%
39%
‘’partially’’
Table 13. Students’ opinion about second-year practical tuition at the Faculty of Physical
Education
Teaching
assistants’
practical
lectures are
Per cent of
students
Interesting
Useful
Uninteresting
Boring
42%
39%
5%
7%
57
6.1.1.8. Colloquia/tests
The results obtained by the anonymous poll show that more than half of the students
(56%) are familiar in advance with how their colloquia and tests are graded. Up to 60%
consider it to be objective, 61% of the students said the results from colloquia and tests
are available for reference and review, and 60% think that colloquia questions are clear
and explicit.
We must also emphasise that regarding those subjects with more unclear way of grading,
professors should come up with a more transparent way of grading by explaining the
students the scores given for certain activities. Moreover, all the professors should try to
make their test questions clearer and unambiguous. Finally, the professors must give the
tests to their students so that they could realise their mistakes and make sure that the
grader’s (professor’s) mark is objective.
Table 14. Students’ opinion about colloquia/tests
Regarding
colloquia/tests
Per cent of
students who
gave positive
answers
Per cent of
students who
gave negative
answers
Per cent of
students whose
answer was
‘’partially’’
The way of
grading is
known in
advance
The grading is
objective
Results are
available for
reference and
review
Questions are
clear and
unequivocal
56%
60%
61%
60%
24%
14%
10%
10%
20%
26%
10%
30%
6.1.1.9. Final examination
When it comes to final examination, only half of the students are familiar with the
grading in advance (50%), 37% find it objective, 60% find the final exam questions clear
and unambiguous, and only 44% consider that exam results are available for further
reference. However, students are not well informed with regard to scoring certain
activities from a given subject (74%) and how the final grade is formed (68%).
58
Hereof, we can conclude that the professors must make some improvements in relation to
the above-mentioned grading (manner, scoring, objectivity, and post-exam availability).
Table 15. Students’ opinion about the final examination
Regarding
colloquia/tests
Per cent of
students who
gave positive
answers
Per cent of
students who
gave negative
answers
Per cent of
students whose
answer was
‘’partially’’
Table 15 (continues)
Regarding
colloquia/tests
familiarity with
Per cent of
students who
gave positive
answers
Per cent of
students who
gave negative
answers
Per cent of
students whose
answer was
‘’partially’’
The way of
grading is
known in
advance
The grading is
objective
Results are
available for
reference and
review
Questions are
clear and
unequivocal
50%
37%
44%
60%
10%
10%
20%
10%
40%
53%
26%
30%
Whether
theoretical
lectures are
helpful in
passing the
examination
Scoring of
certain activities
How the grade
is formed
Which criteria
are to be
followed in
order to pass the
examination
74%
68%
65%
72%
14%
30%
7%
5%
12%
2%
28%
24%
59
Table 15 (continues)
Regarding
colloquia/tests
Taking colloquia
helps passing final
examination
Are there any subject
examination which
can be passed only
by passing colloquia,
and not a final
examination?
Is practical tuition
more helpful when it
comes to getting
ready for the final
examination?
91%
91%
79%
/
9%
7%
9%
/
14%
Per cent of students
who gave positive
answers
Per cent of students
who gave negative
answers
Per cent of students
whose answer was
‘’partially’’
Up to 91% of students consider that passing colloquia is helpful in passing final
examination. In addition, 72% find theoretical lectures and 79% find practical lectures
helpful in passing final examination. The good thing is that up to 91% of the students use
the opportunity to pass second-year examinations by passing colloquia and fulfilling
other types of activities (regular attendance, seminar paper, and practice supplements).
6.1.1.10. Students’ mobility
According to the poll results, 37% of the students consider that the Faculty of Physical
Education has mobility, whereas 40% consider that there is partial mobility. Up to 23%
consider it nonexistent.
Regarding this problem, we think that there is a necessity for more intensive
collaboration with other faculties in the Republic of Macedonia, with the neighbouring
countries (Serbia, Bulgaria, Monte Negro, Croatia, and Slovenia), but also with farther
European destinations. The following phase should introduce the Erasmus Programme,
which will enable true mobility of students, as well as professors and teaching assistants,
and will allow accommodation within other allied faculties, simultaneously allowing
exchange of experience, opinion, and knowledge.
Up to 75% of the students at the Faculty of Physical Education consider that the
internalised knowledge during their studies can be applied in real life practice, whereas
23% think it is only partially true. Subsequently, the Faculty of Physical Education
60
should implement more applicable teaching materials for future qualification of students
regarding practical work.
6.2. Postgraduate studies (Master’s and specialised studies)
The last generation of postgraduate students enrolled in the academic year of 2008/2009,
its number being 11 students. Since the foundation of postgraduate studies, 236 students
have enrolled and 74 students have completed the studies, i.e. have become Masters of
Science.
6.3. Doctoral studies
Regarding this study programme, a request has been sent to the Accreditation Board and
we are now waiting for consent.
We must note that under the Law on Higher Education, all the eligible candidates could
apply for a doctoral dissertation project (without doctoral studies) up to and including
31.12.2011, so 30 candidates filed for their projects, and out of them, 20 fulfilled the
criteria and were granted permission to start with their work on the doctoral dissertation.
6.4. External collaboration
So far, practice has shown that none of the teaching and associate staff at the Faculty of
Physical Education has stayed as guests at other faculties from abroad. Perhaps it would
be good and useful to change this practice in future. Namely, exchanging experiences and
knowledge in areas studied at our Faculty seems to be of great importance, as well as the
possibility to become familiar with and later implement new modules of conducting the
teaching material, all with the purpose of modernising and updating tuition in general.
This would extend the mutual collaboration and by joint participation in international
projects, it would allow gaining extensive research experience.
There are isolated cases where professors teach at Master’s or doctoral studies abroad,
primarily in former Yugoslav countries. Nonetheless, this figure should be bigger.
Moreover, rarely do foreign professors teach at our Faculty when it comes to
undergraduate and postgraduate studies.
Besides collaboration with foreign faculties and universities, it is very important to have
collaboration with other organisations and institutions, which up until now has been quite
bad. However, the new Dean’s Office tries to establish better communication and
collaboration with the Youth and Sports Agency, which could help in enforcement of the
Law on Sports, under which coaches are to exercise their profession only if they are
properly qualified. We also consider that our Faculty should improve the collaboration
with the Macedonian Olympic Committee, mostly because our professional staff can
actively participate in candidate athletes’ preparation for the Olympic Games.
61
Collaboration with sports federations of all sports is also important, primarily because we
train professionals to work in each sport, and because they could properly test athletes’
fitness, design psychological preparation programmes, nutrition programmes, etc. The
collaboration with the Faculty of Security is satisfactory and should be further
maintained.
6.5. Research work
Our professors and associates take part in congresses and symposiums which are mostly
organised on a national level and less abroad (in the neighbouring countries such as
former Yugoslav region and Bulgaria). They regularly publish proceedings and articles.
As for more distant locations, rarely do they visit them due to the improper financial
support by the Ministry of Science of the Republic of Macedonia (although it allocates
funds for this purpose, the same are frequently late or gone). This should be corrected in
future, especially because of the Law on Higher Education, under which advancement in
one’s profession is conditioned by participation in congresses, i.e. publishing articles with
an impact factor in learned periodicals (which also requires financial assets).
The professors and associates at the Faculty participate in research projects in our
country, and rarely internationally. They are financed by the Ministry of Education and
Science. However, the general impression is that the number of realised projects is very
small.
So far, the Faculty has not succeeded in obtaining a European programme such as
Tempus or Phare, despite showing interest in them. So, because the Faculty has not
implemented applicative projects and because it had to pay 13 million denars from its
own funds in order to cover someone else’s debt, the research means are insufficient and
poor. Nevertheless, this situation is about to change because it is our plan to procure new
modern equipment for research activities (of course, within our possibility limits).
It is of great importance that the new Dean’s Office at the Faculty of Physical Education
in Skopje has applied for three host projects, such as:
1. Continuous improvement and permanent education of P.E. teachers in the
Republic of Macedonia (the project has been submitted to the Youth and Sports
Agency)
2. Analysis of the P.E. lesson utilisation in the Republic of Macedonia (the project
has been submitted to the Ministry of Education)
3. Self-assessment and assessment of P.E. tuition in secondary schools in the City of
Skopje (the project has been submitted to the City Mayor)
62
A positive outcome is expected, that is to say, deepening the collaboration with the
above-mentioned institutions and obtaining assets for realisation of at least some of the
projects.
Moreover, the Faculty has plans for future organisation of a congress or symposium.
7. FINANCES
The Faculty gets state funds (from the budget), but it also uses its own assets. The
greatest impact on the amount of those assets had the lowering of the state quota from
400 to 200 euros, which on the other hand had an impact on the self-financing price.
Thus, for the last couple of years, the Faculty of Physical Education has had a smaller
inflow of capitals. Besides, the Faculty has to allocate funds in order to pay for the
secretary (Bachelor of Laws), without whom the institution could not function, but assets
are also needed for the technical staff, which is not paid for by the state.
Since this year, there is a new Rulebook on Salaries, which regulates in detail all the
employees’ responsibilities and awards according to the accomplishment of tasks.
It must be noted that the Faculty has suffered a great deal of financial difficulties in the
past 8 years, first and foremost because of the debt regarding the use of facilities for
tuition by the Physical Education Centre. Namely, instead of all the faculties within Ss.
Cyril and Methodius University in Skopje paying for the tuition in P.E and Sports, for
which renting facilities is necessary, the Faculty had to pay for those services due to
unjust court decisions. For this purpose, The Faculty allocated 11 million denars; the state
budget provided 2 million denars for material costs, but those assets were withdrawn
because of executive court decisions. Thus, later we had to compensate for those assets
from our own budget. Due to this issue, the account of the Faculty was blocked for
several years (fortunately, not in continuation). We sincerely hope that, in future, the
Rector of the University will be able to correct this mistake by firstly enabling
enforcement of the Law on Higher Education, under which Physical Education and
Sports is a mandatory subject at all the faculties, and secondly, by making sure that each
faculty pays for its tuition services.
It is most certain that in future the Faculty will try to find other ways of financing
(perhaps through new study programmes) and will also try to seek financial help for new
equipment from other institutions and faculties from abroad.
63
8. CONCLUSIONS
1. The Faculty has already elaborated study programmes and the foreseeable future
should include seeking accreditation for undergraduate studies in Physical
Education in:
•
Preschool Tuition
•
I to IV-grade Tuition
•
Sports Journalism
•
Sports Law
•
Sports and Tourism
•
Kinesiotherapy
•
Recreation
•
Health
•
Other
2. Furthermore, there should also be new divisions regarding postgraduate and
doctoral studies. Each professor should make efforts in reference to more updated
literature. Also, new research projects should be conducted on a regular basis, if
possible, which will be presented in tuition or other research projects in related
areas.
3. Decision should be made according to which P.E should become a mandatory
subject at faculties.
4. The Faculty should offer elective subjects for the entire University (within 10% of
the total classes)
5. The restrictive policy towards employing new cadres at the Ss. Cyril and
Methodius University in Skopje should be put to an end, after which new
associate staff can be employed for each subject. Meanwhile, the new staff could
‘’help’’ with other allied subjects, which is a common practice at many faculties.
6. The academic staff meets the needs in relation to their competence for exercising
teaching and research activities. A part of the professors and associates publishes
articles in periodicals. Only a few publish articles with an impact factor. The
election of professors and associates is in compliance with the University criteria.
64
7. The number of professors covering subjects is in general satisfactory.
8. The realisation of mentor, practical, and theoretical tuition in all study
programmes is on a satisfactory level.
9. The Faculty collaborates with many faculties within the University and there are
teaching professors from other faculties. However, very few professors from our
Faculty are invited to teach elsewhere, which should be corrected in future.
10. International collaboration with same or allied faculties do exist, however, it is on
a lower level. In our opinion, this should be changed in future.
11. As for qualifying students, we consider that oral communication is on a higher
level but, unfortunately, scientific literature is not frequently used, especially the
foreign one. Tuition should be more interactive. Computer techniques and other
contemporary technologies are applied to a certain extent; however, it should be
more intensified.
12. The choice of graduation thesis, its quality and presence per subject, and the
choice of the Commission are not always satisfactory. Therefore, we think that
this should be changed and that everything in relation to the choice of graduation
thesis should be verified by the Professors’ Board.
13. Regarding student enrolment – more intensive activities and marketing strategies
should be applied, all in order to emphasise the value of these studies.
14. The Faculty should also take actions regarding definition, existence, and
legislative acceptance of nomenclature of titles and qualification for which the
Faculty issues diplomas.
15. The Faculty should ask the state authorities to finance the work positions which
were previously financed and are now closed, such as: Secretary at the Faculty
(legal secretary) and technical staff.
16. Material and space conditions at the Faculty are not satisfactory. The Faculty uses
the same facilities for tuition with the Sports Gymnasium, and for that reason they
work in different shifts, which is unacceptable for a faculty institution. The
number of lecture halls, sports halls, and laboratories is also small and
insufficient. A major problem is the sports hall constructed by the Youth and
Sports Agency, which does not have any heating. Thus, the Faculty does not use it
in winter conditions, nor does it rent it. Moreover, the hall is not connected to a
sewerage system, so we are continually facing issues regarding its maintenance
and not being able to rent it so that we could have some income to cover the costs.
65
We have sent a request to the Youth and Sports Agency and we are looking
forward to a fast solution to this problem.
17. Regarding the fact that during the construction of the new sports hall, several
outdoor objects were destroyed (basketball, handball, football playground and a
running track), we have also made a request to the Youth and Sports Agency for
their reconstruction.
18. As for the equipment for the tuition, all the professors have their own computers
and printers. There are 4 LCD projectors and several scanners. Perhaps we should
consider other forms of equipment in future, which the employees would find
helpful in research projects. The entire campus is covered by the Internet.
19. Efforts should be made to upgrade the existing equipment, but also to obtain new
one for research purposes.
20. Our library is not connected to any online libraries worldwide, so there is no
opportunity to order books or journals. This should be changed in future.
21. The Faculty has started with electronic record keeping for students and
examinations, but only for the first year of studies. This system should be applied
to the rest of the years, but it takes time and updating of the Student Services
Office.
22. For all the activities covered by the Faculty employees, per cent should be
allocated to the Faculty, such as defence of graduation, Master’s, and doctoral
thesis.
23. All the financial income should be for intended purposes only, within the
framework of the area where it came from. For example, if those assets come
from defence of graduation thesis, they should be intended only for teaching
purposes. The assets from Master’s thesis and doctoral dissertation should be used
for II and III level of studies (provision of equipment necessary for research
activities).
24. The Faculty should apply independently, but also with other faculties, for many
different projects, so that assets could be obtained for supplying the Faculty with
new equipment and for gaining experience in the research area.
25. The Faculty should organise a congress and everything should be done in order to
realise this goal as soon as possible.
66
26. The Faculty should allocate assets for one-month stay of the staff at other allied
institutions abroad, for the purposes of exchange of experiences, acquiring new
perspectives in various areas and further improvements.
27. Additional P.E. classes should be held to serve as counterpoise for students’ all
day sitting in school.
28. The Physical Education Centre should be transformed into a University Sports
Centre and all of its employees should be relocated as employees at the faculties
they teach.
29. A project has been put forward and a request has been made for reconstruction of
the administrative building to the Ministry of Education (Sector of Investments).
We expect that this issue will be realised very soon, either by reconstruction of
the existing building, or by construction of an entirely new one.
SELF-EVALUATION COMMITTEE:
Prof. Daniela Šukova Stojmanovska, PhD – Chairperson (personal signature)
Prof. Lenče Aleksovska Veličkovska, PhD – Member (personal signature)
Prof. Robert Hristovski, PhD – Member (personal signature)
Prof. Vojo Nastevski, PhD – Member (personal signature)
Prof. Orce Mitevski, PhD – Member (personal signature)
Rumen Ampovski – Student member (personal signature)
Filip Masevski – Student member (personal signature)

STDs - Health Information Translations

Untitled

Food-Product Portfolio

D&O policy wording for Croatia [HR/EN]

Notification Concerning the Change of Important Employee at the

Analysis of Accidents During Cable Yarding Operations in

Human Rights Theory and Practice