『診療ガイドライン作成マニュアル』 Ver.2.0(2016.03.15) 参考文献 参考文献 - 217 Copyright(c) All rights reserved by Minds, Japan Council for Quality Health Care 『診療ガイドライン作成マニュアル』 Ver.2.0(2016.03.15) 参考文献 1章 Institute of Medicine (IOM). 2011. Clinical Practice Guidelines We Can Trust. Edited by Robin Graham, Michelle Mancher, Dianne Miller Wolman, Sheldon Greenfield, and Earl Steinberg. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press. 2章 AGREE Next Steps Consortium (2009). The AGREE Ⅱ Instrument [Electronic version]Retrieved February 28, 2013, from http://www.agreetrust.org ICMJE. Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Journals: Writing and Editing for Biomedical Publication. available from http://www.icmje.org/ (2013.2.28accessed) 厚生労働省.厚生労働科学研究における利益相反の管理に関する指針.2008. available from http://www.mhlw.go.jp/seisakunitsuite/bunya/hokabunya/kenkyujigyou/ikenkyu/index.htmlorg/ (2013.2.28accessed) Institute of Medicine (IOM). 2009. Conflict of Interest in Medical Research, Education, and Practice. Washington, D. C.: National Academies Press. 日本医学会.2011.医学研究の COI マネージメントに関するガイドライン. G-I-N PUBLIC .G-I-N PUBLIC Toolkit: Patient and Public Involvement in Guidelines.2012. available from http://www.g-i-n.net/activities/gin-public/toolkit (2013.2.28 accessed) 3章 相原守夫 他.2010.診療ガイドラインのための GRADE システム‐治療介入‐,凸版メデ ィア. 4章 [No authors listed]. 1980. Systematic review of the benzodiazepines. Guidelines for data sheets on diazepam, chlordiazepoxide, medazepam, clorazepate, lorazepam, oxazepam, temazepam, triazolam, nitrazepam, and flurazepam. Committee on the Review of Medicines. Br Med J 280:910-2. PMID: 7388368 Ades AE, Lu G, Higgins JP. 2005. The interpretation of random-effects meta-analysis in decision models. Med Decis Making 25:646-54. PMID: 16282215 Altman DG. 1998. Confidence intervals for the number needed to treat. BMJ 317:130912. PMID: 9804726 Altman DG, Andersen PK. 1999. Calculating the number needed to treat for trials where the outcome is time to an event. BMJ 319:1492-5. PMID: 10582940 Balshem H, Helfand M, Schünemann HJ et al. 2011. GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the - 218 Copyright(c) All rights reserved by Minds, Japan Council for Quality Health Care 『診療ガイドライン作成マニュアル』 Ver.2.0(2016.03.15) 参考文献 quality of evidence. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 64(4): 401-406. Bowden J, Tierney JF, Copas AJ, Burdett S. 2011. Quantifying, displaying and accounting for heterogeneity in the meta-analysis of RCTs using standard and generalised Q statistics. BMC Med Res Methodol 11:41. PMID: 21473747 Chalmers, T. C., P. Celano, H. S. Sacks, and H. Smith Jr.. 1983. Bias in treatment assignment in controlled clinical trials. N Eng J of Med 309(22):1358–61. Cumming G. 2012. Understanding the new statistics: effect sizes, confidence intervals, and meta-analysis, Taylor & Francis Group, New York, NY, USA. Eysenck HJ. 1995. Meta-analysis of best-evidence synthesis? J Eval Clin Pract 1:29-36. PMID: 9238555 Herbison P, Hay-Smith J, Gillespie WJ. 2011. Different methods of allocation to groups in randomized trials are associated with different levels of bias. A metaepidemiological study. J Clin Epidemiol 64:1070-5. Higgins JPT, Green S eds. 2011. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration, Available from www.cochrane-handbook.org. Higgins JP, Thompson SG. 2002. Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat Med 21:1539-58. PMID: 12111919 Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Spiegelhalter DJ. 2009. A re-evaluation of random-effects meta-analysis. J R Stat Soc Ser A Stat Soc 172:137-159. PMID: 19381330 Higgins JPT, Altman DG, Gøtzsche PC et al. 2011. The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ 343:d5928. Institute of Medicine. 2011. Finding What Works in Health Care: Standards for Systematic Reviews. Edited by Jill Eden, Laura Levit, Alfred Berg, and Sally Morton. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press. Smith ML, Glass GV. 1977. Meta-analysis of psychotherapy outcome studies. Am Psychol 32:752-60. PMID: 921048 Warn DE, Thompson SG, Spiegelhalter DJ. 2002. Bayesian random effects meta-analysis of trials with binary outcomes: methods for the absolute risk difference and relative risk scales. Stat Med 21:1601-23. PMID: 12111922 Wortman PM, Yeaton WH. 1987. Using research synthesis in medical technology assessment. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 3:509-22. PMID: 10285721 Viechtbauer W. 2010. Conducting Meta-Analyses in R with the metaphor Package. J Stat Soft 36:1-48. (http://www.jstatsoft.org/v36/i03/paper ) 5章 Institute of Medicine (IOM). 2011. Clinical Practice Guidelines We Can Trust. Edited - 219 Copyright(c) All rights reserved by Minds, Japan Council for Quality Health Care 『診療ガイドライン作成マニュアル』 Ver.2.0(2016.03.15) 参考文献 by Robin Graham, Michelle Mancher, Dianne Miller Wolman, Sheldon Greenfield, and Earl Steinberg. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press. Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN). 2011. SIGN 50: A Guideline Developer’s Handbook. Revised Edition. Edinburgh: Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network. 6章 AGREE Next Steps Consortium. 2009. The AGREE II Instrument [Electronic version]. Retrieved February 27, 2013, from http://www.agreetrust.org. Guidelines International Patient and Public Involvement Working Group(G-I-N PUBLIC). 2012. G-I-N PUBLIC Toolkit: Patient and Public Involvement in Guidelines. Retrieved November 23, 2013. from http://www.g-i-n.net/documentstore/working-groups-documents/g-i-n-public/toolkit/toolkit-combined.pdf. Higgins JPT, Green S eds. 2011. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration, Available from www.cochrane-handbook.org. Institute of Medicine (IOM). 2011a. Clinical Practice Guidelines We Can Trust. Edited by Robin Graham, Michelle Mancher, Dianne Miller Wolman, Sheldon Greenfield, and Earl Steinberg. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press. Institute of Medicine. 2011b. Finding What Works in Health Care: Standards for Systematic Reviews. Edited by Jill Eden, Laura Levit, Alfred Berg, and Sally Morton. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press. Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, et al. 2009. The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies that Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration. PLoS Med 6(7): e1000100. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000100. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE). 2012. The Guidelines Manual: Process and Methods Guide. London: NICE. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. 2013. Factsheet 2: How organizations representing patients and cares can get involved. Factsheets for patients and cares: contributing to NICE clinical guideline. London: NICE. Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN). 2011. SIGN 50: A Guideline Developer’s Handbook. Revised Edition. Edinburgh: Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network. Shea BJ, Grimshaw JM, Wells GA, et al. 2007. Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews. BMC Medical Research Methodology 7:10. - 220 Copyright(c) All rights reserved by Minds, Japan Council for Quality Health Care 『診療ガイドライン作成マニュアル』 Ver.2.0(2016.03.15) 参考文献 Shiffman RN, Shekelle P, Overhage JM, et al. 2003. Standardized Reporting of Clinical Practice Guidelines: A Proposal from the Conference on Guideline Standardization. Ann Intern Med 139:493-8. Shiffman RN, Dixon J, Brandt C, et al. 2005. The Guideline Implementability Appraisal (GLIA): Development of an Instrument to Identify Obstacles to Guideline Implementation. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 5(23). World Health Organization (WHO). 2012. WHO Handbook for Guideline Development. Geneva: World Health Organization. 7章 Alonso-Coello P, Garcia LM, Carrasco JM, et al. 2011. The Updating of Clinical Practice Guidelines: Insights from an International Survey. Implementation Science 6: 107. Higgins JPT, Green S eds. 2011. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration, Available from www.cochrane-handbook.org. Institute of Medicine (IOM). 2011. Clinical Practice Guidelines We Can Trust. Edited by Robin Graham, Michelle Mancher, Dianne Miller Wolman, Sheldon Greenfield, and Earl Steinberg. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE). 2012. The Guidelines Manual: Process and Methods Guide. London: NICE. Shekelle PG, Ortiz E, Rhodes S, et al. 2001. Validity of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Clinical Practice Guidelines: How Quickly Do Guidelines Become Outdated? JAMA 286(12): 1461-1467. Shojania KG, Sampson M, Ansari MT, et al. 2007. How quickly do systematic reviews go out of date?: A survival analysis. Ann Intern Med 21;147(4):224-33. World Health Organization (WHO). 2012. WHO Handbook for Guideline Development. Geneva: World Health Organization. - 221 Copyright(c) All rights reserved by Minds, Japan Council for Quality Health Care
© Copyright 2024 Paperzz