PDF

CHANGE OF IMMUNE CONDITION DURING THE PERIPARTURIENT PERIOD
5;I?
>A<(2H/F%'=4(#$.873)D09:)@1
Œñ.FÄ
ù"´!2
¸è[È
êÁ‘Ä
ñôëÅ
HZùÕA ù-B/‰©œÌ
)34780<:6< îäªÔ`(Å*679þ7905*
2_Xú+Ï$ù"´!
TEL$45;:067087;5
FAX$45;:0670<;47
[email protected]
!FE"
Ò—TAFa1U§³QOƒá÷QU–¡cüaL[!CE0TâW?ãc$IÊ\cUIL
1UCEó°TAFaLÚ¦7¦›U˜6¨»cÎÆIL"öݝVCEÉT¬™ÿæ!âW?ã!
<…#†SRUÖ«CZ_b!gwlet)Ca*í¿U'%Ê\c¶ML1)Ê\ %n19*Q!~
àUZ_bSBMLöÛ )n157*P=a"”À—•ý!Ê\ U¦ý Ca 5)VöÛ T:X#E
å€I!CEó5ÓQCE°70TA>OP}Sºc2[L"CE70°TAFaÊ\ U CD7/A
^W CD8/T ½GçVöÛ T:XP}T#E!KU°\#ûPå€Ja¢±T=ML"Í> U CD
65/B ½GçV”À—•c!IOöÛ T:X#E!CE70!6ÓA^W8Ó°TA>OP}S#û
c2[L"YLCE°8ÓTAFaÊ\ U¦ë IgG ûVöÛ T:XP}T·>ûcËIL"|Þ
U¥Š^`!CEÉTÊ\cUJa1PV!CEó°TOƒ˜6U~àC=a\UQ˹HbL"
-h'y'p$1!Oƒ˜6!âW?ã!Ò—.
!*&,("
GçC#Eå€JaQHbO>a+59,
"H_
1UÒ—T8ìJaS&SìY&øÐU
TÒ—T13]ko'lmQ>MLøÐÍ>
D‡V!Í>U8ÜTùDE–RIO>a"1
c8ÜIL1PV!“òÜc8ÜJavmj
VCE°U;1ÃT^MOfqwi'Uš
C·ESaQHbOA`+:#
5;,
!Ò—TA
]C·ESaGQTˆ@!S&SmoxmUL
FaøÐé͒Q„Üé͒QVMðS–¡U
[¼â]C­×I@Ufqwi'ruzmcQ
=aGQC˹Hba"IBI!CEÉTˆ\
8JaGQPÒ—Í>8ÜUvmjc·[!
C=US1TAFaCEó°UOƒá÷TN
N>TVOƒ˜6U#†cÙEQHbO>a
>OV=Y`NŽTHbO>S>"J©œPV
"
+7,
Ò—TA>O^ØÜáC{‡IÊ\cUIL
§³S1PV²ý›˜6U#†] T ½G
1TAFa!1—B_CE°TBFOUO
çU­×SRCZ_b!GU^?SOƒ˜6U
ƒ˜6c‹ïIL"
#†CCE°U“òÜ8ìT‚ŸIO>aQµ
@_b+;#
<#
55,
!4K“òÜUvmj\·Y
!6G#-+BC"
a+6,
"ξT!„Üé͒c8ÜIL1P
J©œPV7¯UIßP¤VHbO>L5<,
V§³S®õT:XO!CEÉULÚ¦ T ½
UswmndzÑ1T£ÂcT>L"žÇ
(5(
Journal of Japanese Society for Clinical Infections Disease
in Farm Animals Vol.4 No.1 2009
861)@3(&'*C+;=)A,
R<I=?ÈQ°¢ýâ!ÞO:à!5“ÿ”
ë Ý C H"® 3ml ] i v n o ž Q ‹ C!
PORÖÜ@VY\!b…h`~)Ca*¿]
1$
940‘•^ˆs`~K]®R3/T–
ùßNCHF¿R$I@ÍÄB\H)§)>
=!讥]K®BFH"BYQ!2611rpm
1,1$
5*]ÊS«)n.6!>©
©ÊS˜ã3$
M4= ßC!ýVQ2(26M „ˆÃŸ×
ÁÉã4$
2,1$
4*NC!ÊS]6MNCP?J
)PBS*
]–=Lã˜êÛCH´!PBS M"£
H)§]õÕ«)n.24!>©ÁÉã4$
3,1$
7*
¡ÏC!1®¥;G]ÀæCH"2-215/R
NCH"P>!ÊS«R§SÊS´Q˜<C!
ŽÉ·ô]|_d‡m‚&xQ21‰L EK–
.LNP[ÖUS*WY\P?JH"íLR¨
=!¡Ï®;G]=úC!5/M2È 3
ƧSmh&ðN+¶ÇR]L;H=P¦
"GR´ PBS MêÛC!2
’BFH
)Table2*
IQXJLǍB\L>Z!&!RDÚQ2å
-215/R'É·ô)fluorescein isothiocyanate
@ÓùD[ANSP?JH"¨Æ§?Y=?ì
8Ì·|`i IgM ·ôUHS phycoerythrin
7Ò!2Ò>XT=?´4(!3ÒPYTQ5
8Ì·|`i IgG ·ô*
]–=!
5/M41= ÒQ>;L!³ì21È?Y23ÈUMRÈ Q¼
3’BFH"3’´ PBS MêÛC!
w‡&g
®CH"P>!º˜õØNCH²ôR=?H!
_r€&l&
)FACScan!Becton Dickinson
(N;R=?(QS4(ŠÙRŒ;SVY\
Î!U.S.A.*QXZ—çCH"ò!q&lS
P?JH"
Cell Quest ]L;L—ç]¸JH"
®Szu„ˆ!EDTA+3Na!y†&ˆ¼
„ˆu¥JЕ3’SŠ”RþZQÍÄC
®žQ@óC!š¯»Q¨CH"®å•œ¯
H"UE!zu„ˆ–᪼®žM¼ÑCH®
»MSïf†ip‡&…)TC%¹îA*
!GP
?Y„ˆ{ju&…]L;L÷›¥]=PC
ÅCÃ)NEFA%ACS+ACOD A*
!^iuƒ
H"=PCH½BS3˜ PBS MêÛC!2-
c ˆ à ^ } t r ƒ ˆ i w a ƒ & k)AST%
217²(mL N P [ X < Q RPMI Medium 2751
NADH+UV A*
!Ca)4ÝA*
!_~te‡x
MûäCH"½BS6‰g(mL R Phytohem-
„ˆ
)Ig*
G)4 ö A*] ò ! C H"1 ® ¥ ã
agglutin)PHA*] – = L!48/!83È 0
)WBC*SË%®¥­Âñø)CELLTAC α#
NCH"0N´S!MTT)6‰g(mL*M½B
NIHON KOHDEN#
CO$
*Q X Z ò ! C!W
]ëÝC!GR3È ´Q Sodium Dodecyl
Q¥ã>XT÷›¥ãS1®¥7=4?YÂÔ
Sulfate QXZ½B]-™CL!35È ´Q¤
CH"
µ#­)Model 4661 MACROPLATE READER#
1®¥R9E·±R—çS 鬵·ôAM
BIORAD Laboratories#inc$
*QXZ,ü6:1
Table1. Antibodies used in the immunostaining of peripheral blood mononuclear leukocytes.
Antigen
MAb clone
Isotype
Specificity
Source1,2
CD3
MM1A
IgG1
Pan T cell
VMRD
CD4
CACT138A
IgG1
Helper/inducer
VMRD
CD8
CACT80C
IgG1
Cytotoxic
VMRD
CD14
MY4
IgG2b
Monocyte
Coulter
CD21
GB25A
IgM
B cell
VMRD
1
VMRD=VMRD, Inc. (pullman, WA, U.S.A.)
Coulter=Becman Coulter (Tokyo, Japan)
The original concentration of the MAb solution was 1 μg/mL.
2
?B->D90<:42.7
$/"5 #!!%
'
3
'
CHANGE OF IMMUNE CONDITION DURING THE PERIPARTURIENT PERIOD
nm AŽ•;="
bjE`‹t¦F—{fE‰ŒS¢i*ž
qvDNPŸ};!.jeE§YvD?5@F
,1S
Student E ttest D N P n • ;!P+,$
§YCvB;="
!$#"
.jEmŠ Ca ›–F¡¤2€Xs7O
‚%D”];!¡¤p/™D65@w”S}
;@!<Epa krS};="dyfe‘!
|ªjEmŠ Ca ›–F„jDH”9†Z
;!¡¤-€B¡¤p/™D65@§YCv
SšJ=".jEmŠ TC ›–F¡¤2€7
O¡¤p/™D7:@M>9PB”];!<E
pglD…ƒ;="¡¤-€XsE|ªjE
mŠ TC ›–F„jDH”9†Z;!¡¤
-€!¡¤p.€6NG0€[email protected]
D§YCvSšJ="mŠ AST cˆF.jB
Fig. 1. Changes in the Ca (1), TC (2) and AST
(3) levels in treated group ("), and control group
(!). Values are expressed as the mean S.E.
Asterisks indicate significant differences between
the two groups (!<0.05).
K¡¤p/™D[_ˆD…ƒ;!˜D|ªjA
o’A4>=8!.jeD§YCvFšJOR
C7>='Fig$
-(
"mŠ NEFA F¡¤€7O¡¤p.€D7:@|ªjA„jD
H@u5krD4>=KEE§YvFšJOR
C7>="
«©h‡DF¡¤pS“;@o’C£^L
vFšJORC7>="|ªjE WBC F¡
¤p-€D[_ˆD”];=8!¡¤p0€D
Fa ;="„jE WBC Fdyfe‘W
•;@†Z;!.jeDF§YCvSšJC7
>="
|ªjE CD/)!CD0)6NG CD3)T x
¥‡F¡¤2€XsD”]krS};!¡¤
p/™DFw”BCP!<Ep‚%Da ;
="I=¡¤p/™D6:Q|ªjE CD/)
Fig. 2. Changes in the numbers of CD3 + T cells
(1) and lymphocyte proliferate reaction (2) in
treated group ("), and control group (!). Values
are expressed as the mean S.E. Asterisks
indicate significant differences between the two
groups (!<0.05).
6NG CD0)T x¥‡F„jDH§YC
”A4>="PHA zlUVTh¨~^œ\
D65@F!.jeD§YCvSšJC7>=
'Fig$
.#
/(
"CD-0)x¥DF§Yˆ E 4 Q.
&/&
Journal of Japanese Society for Clinical Infections Disease
in Farm Animals Vol.4 No.1 2009
861)@3(&'*C+;=)A,
Fig. 3. Changes in the numbers of CD4+ (1) and
CD8+ T cells (2) in treated group ("), and control
group (!). Values are expressed as the mean S.E. Asterisks indicate significant differences
between the two groups (!<0.05).
Fig. 4. Changes in the numbers of CD21+ B cell
(1) and serum IgG concentration (2) in treated
group ("), and control group (!). Values are
expressed as the mean S.E. Asterisks indicate
significant differences between the two groups
(!<0.05).
‚yH’Ps‚HÔnIÈNRUF7A@"
-‚ H CD-,*B ” Ø ­ I Ó Õ ³/Ÿ 7 R
æH‰¢82A@OHE5RUT"™ä‚D
¡$G¿m=!ÓՊ.ÆG“¿ºEFAC!
IÓÕ.Ɗ7R¿ T ”Ø­8x•<U@8!
*
?HŠrÑ>Tƒ‹Vš=@"™ä‚H CD-,
ÇÉV̦=@¦çDIÜl{ËVâ®>TZ
B ”Ø­I¶¥‚GÍKx•zy¼GÞhF¿
d^\dH†¼ÊÂ8§£>TE<UC6S
ºD¬i=@"™ä‚H†° IgG ÊÂIÓÕ
(/)
!oäVá>TQ4FÓÕ³ŠHµ½Ðå
³,ŸgŽ¡$G§£>Tƒ‹Vš=!ÓՊ
8¿ T ”ØVßÌ=@ˆjD2Tp˯I
/ŸG63C“ºG—A@8!¶¥‚DIx
3"ÃàG!ž–z›ÏV̦=@ǀDIÚ
•zy¼fÀ=C¬i=@"ÓՊ/ŸG6:
¤† T ”Ø8‰¢>T;EOא<UC3T
T™ä‚H†° IgG ÊÂI¶¥‚GÍKÞh
"
(,1)
G3ºVš=@&Fig#
/'
"
Kimura R(,+)I!ž–zHǀDI¿ Ca
GEOFAC¸t”ØH”ØÅJH»± Ca æ
!#$"
8‰¢>T;EVÛR7G=C3T"”ØÅ
ه~DI!ÓՊGªãЫV̦=!o
Ca I”ØÅ[Y_ceYGÎáD2T@N!
äVá=@ǀHž–zG6:TÜl©·GB
†¼ Ca H¿mGEOFA@¸t}Å»± Ca
3C…qV¾ACx•=@"ه~H™ä‚H
H‰¢I!Ül{ËH¿mVßÄ>TOHE
†¼ Ca ÊÂIwÇz7RÞhF¿m8˜´=
5RUC3T";H;EI!ÓÕ³7R†¼
CMRU@;E7R!™ä‚Hµ½ÐåG†¼
Ca ÊÂ8¿m=@™ä‚G63C!Ül”Ø
Ca ÊÂH¿m8k=C3@OHE¬•<U
ÅHXd[Wb»±8‰¢=!Ül{Ë¿m8
T"L@™ä‚H†° TC ÊÂIÓÕ³7R˜
|9@p˯82T"
´ÁF¿ºD¬i=@8!TC H¿mIwÒ²
v¯„`]ae D.I Ca HŒ¨¯VÖB@
æH‰¢Vš‘>T;E7R
(0)
!wÒ²
NG áFÝuV¹AC3T"œFXd[Wb
?B->D90<:42.7
$/"5 #!!%
%
/
%
CHANGE OF IMMUNE CONDITION DURING THE PERIPARTURIENT PERIOD
çzkpnrH6WÆõÀ×kpnrI]pb
tLæ<IAG9V!úüѦL…/Zö-I
f&pLTEG!ielr D1;Ú¸@Xˆ
ADì–HNØĝLóOGúü¦M}Í%~
͞ielr D1IKW"ˆÍžielr D
‚äM&t;£ÞH6ED†ïÍ;¶@XD"
1N T ­ýM IFN-%S[re&q[^r(IL)
!¢•HNúüѦL³ÕâKá Ca MÈÙ
-0¯Ï!۔M IL-/0¯ÏÔÊKJ T ­ý
L6V…/Z-ADì–HN!»¯‘Lá T
Mú„ÓÉS­ýÍ%~’ïMˆÍ§‡Z'B
­ýS B ­ýI7ED%~’ïwÇ;Ž®@
W*/0#
/1+
"PD!ˆÍžielr D MÚ¸
XD?I:U!úü¦MŒÐÅMñÅod_;
ùH6W/#
03-chgq^bielr D1N
«PW?I;¶¬@XD"úü´Má]pb\
T ­ýLTW IL-2S IL-3#IL-/.KJ}Í
m¡ÅNû‰šMº¾0Záƒ@C!ìå¨M
%~LYWa[f][rM¯ÏZӅ@CW
›ßZ#LADV±“Mº¾;݀ADVA
?I;$U:IKEG7W
*/+
"ìíHNˆÍ
G­œMŒÐZ+vLAG!ìþS±“K
žielr D îã;áƒASB7?I;ñÅ
JMŒÐÅZñÅASB<KWDQ!úüѦ
!á Ca
¤{MyFL—>UXW?I:U
*3+
L…/Z-BWì–MŒÐÅ)ÿLN½úKð
Z¶ADµ/HRè,LˆÍžielr D
.;ö-H6WIª8UXD"
îã;áƒAG7D†ïÍ;6V!Ca Ú¸w
ÇNµ/HŽ®@XD T ­ýM¥Á;­ý
!#&%$"
/$Ametaj, B. N., Beitz, D. C., Reinhardt, T.
Í%~’ïMáƒL|™AD-{MyFI¶¬
@XD"
A . and Nonnecke . B . J . 1996. 1,25-
Ž®‘ZàAG!µ/M CD0/,B ­ý
Dihydroxyvitamin D 3 inhibits secretion
Ì;ØĝLóOGá<ËxAD"ìíKJM
of interferon-· by mitogen- and antigen-
»¯‘·÷MÖñBW–HN!Šì‘:Uô
stimulated bovine mononuclear leukocytes.
쿑L:=G B ­ý;áÜH6W?I;$
Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol. 52 : 77-90.
!!¢•L9=Wµ/
U:L@XG9V*/5+
0$Daynes, R. A., Enioutina, E. Y., Butler, S.,
HŽ®@XD ‡I1²BW"?M?I:U
Mu, H. H. McGee, Z. A. and Araneo, B.
»¯‘·÷ZñÅBWì–HN!úüѦL"
A. 1996. Induction of common mucosal
á B ­ýÌ;áÜHËxBW?I;ª8U
immunity by hormonally immunomodulated
XW"PDµ/HNúü2¼¦L¡Î IgG
peripheral immunization. Infect. Immunol.
îã;ØĝLóOG'uLÆÂAD"B ­ý
64 : 1100-1109.
N}Í%~‚äMÔÊLTV©×¯Ï­ýIK
1$Goff, J. P. 2006. Major Advances in Our
V!¡Î IgG îã;ÆÂBW"ÅÍ·‹H
Understanding of Nutritional Influences
Nì–HN"á B ­ýÌI¡Î%`qjo
on Bovine Health J. Dairy Sci. 89 : 1292-
rîãL!PD"á B ­ýÌI Pokeweed
1301.
mitogen °Ÿ*¹„ò‚ILøMҐÍ;6
2$Goff, J. P,, Kimura, K. and Horst, R. L.
W?IR$U:L@XG7W?I:U*/2+
!
2002. Effect of mastectomy on milk
·÷HNúü2¼¦LN}Í%~‚ä;˜<
fever, energy, and vitamins A, E, and
(é@XG7D?I;¶¬@XW"Shafer
beta-carotene status at parturition. J.
Weaver U*/4+N!ú ü ¦1ë s ê M ì –
Dairy Sci. 85 : 1427-1436.
HN­ýÍ%~‚ä;áƒA}Í%~‚ä;&
3$Horst, R. L., Goff, J. P. and Reinhardt, T.
'3'
Journal of Japanese Society for Clinical Infections Disease
in Farm Animals Vol.4 No.1 2009
861)@3(&'*C+;=)A,
A.
1994.
Calcium
and
vitamin
D
role of 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3. J. Cell.
metabolism in the dairy cow. J. Dairy
Biochem. 49 : 26-31.
')"Lemire, J. M. 1995. Immunomodulatory
Sci. 77 : 1936-1951. Review.
,"Kehrli, M. E. Jr. and Goff. J. P. 1989.
actions of 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3. J.
Periparturient hypocalcemia in cows:
Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. 53 : 599-602.
Effects on peripheral neutrophil and
'*"|€_~!sdTe!mŠ•St^!aq
lymphocyte function. J. Dairy Sci. 72 :
“h!yLp}e!vzuf"(&&,"No
1188-119.
rjU6—U24†Z6018Žn\‡\
-"Kehrli, M. E. Jr., Nonnecke, B. J. and
YC@DH$;EJ5FJ?Y‘kPˆ
O"…Q”Rg (/#*--+("
Roth, J. A. 1989. Alterations in bovine
'+"Ohtsuka, H., Koiwa, M., Fukuda, S.,
neutrophil function during the periparturient
period. Am. J. Vet. Res. 50 : 207-214.
Satoh, Y., Hayashi, T., Hoshi, F., Yoshino,
."Kehrli, M. E. Jr., Nonnecke, B. J. and
T. and Kawamura, S. 2004. Changes in
Roth, J. A. 1989. Alterations in bovine
peripheral leukocyte subsets in dairy
lymphocyte
cows with inflammatory diseases after
function
during
the
periparturient period. Am. J. Vet. Res.
calving. J. Vet. Med. Sci. 66 : 905-909.
',"Shafer-Weaver, K. A., Corl, C. M. and
50 : 215-220.
/"Kida, K. 2003. Relationships of metabolic
Sordillo, L. M. 1999. Shifts in bovine CD4
profiles to milk production and feeding
+ subpopulations increase T-helper-2
in dairy cows. J. Vet. Med. Sci. 65 : 671-
compared with T-helper-1 effector cells
617.
during the postpartum period. J. Dairy
'&"Kimura, K., Reinhardt, T. A. and Goff, J.
Sci. 82 : 1696-1706.
P. 2006. Parturition and hypocalcemia
'-"Van Kampen, C. and Mallard, B. A. 1997.
blunts calcium signals in immune cells of
Effects of peripartum stress and health
dairy cattle. J. Dairy Sci. 89 : 2588-2595.
on circulating bovine lymphocyte subsets.
''"Kimura, K., Goff, J. P., Kehrli, M. E. Jr.
Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol. 59 : 79-91.
and Harp, J. A. 1999. Phenotype analysis
'."‚Œ}`!|€_~!mŠ•St^!„
of peripheral blood mononuclear cells in
pX!i˜xVe!KƒW–!‚Œ|c!
periparturient cows. J. Dairy Sci. 82 :
bƒ ‰"(&&-"‹w]6018†’Z
315-319.
[6{38MBIA9:G=<>7’
'("Lemire, J. M. 1992. Immunomodulatory
?B->D90<:42.7
$/"5 #!!%
%
r …lRg ,&#-&/--'*"
,
%
CHANGE OF IMMUNE CONDITION DURING THE PERIPARTURIENT PERIOD
Changes of Immune Condition in Dairy Cows Needed the Treatment
at Calving during the Periparturient Period
Naoko Kanikawa, Hiromichi Ohtsuka, Rui Imase, Hiroko Hareyama and Seiichi Kawamura
School of Veterinary Medicine, Kitasato University
(35-1, Higashi23bancho, Towada, Aomori, 034-8628, Japan)
ABSTRACT
To recognize the relationship between health and immune condition on dairy cows
during periparturient period, we analyzed peripheral leukocyte function in the cows with
no appetite and needed treatment at calving around calving. The cows observed
depression, anorexia and cold skin and treated by calcium (Ca) fluid administration
(treated group; n=5) and no treatment healthy cows (control group; n=13) were used to
analyze. Lower blood Ca concentration in treated group lasted compared with control
group during this experiment, and significant differences were observed at week 1 before
calving and day 3 after calving. After calving day 3, the number of peripheral CD3+ and
CD4+ T cell in treated group were significantly lower than those in control group, and
lower cell numbers were observed after that. Number of CD21+ B cell in treated group
was lower during this observation, and significant lower was observed at day 3, week 2
and week 4 compared with control group after calving. In addition, serum IgG
concentration was significantly higher in treated group than that in control group at week
4 after calving. These result suggested that abnormal immune condition in dairy cows
needed treatment at calving was observed around calving.
"Key Word : dairy cow, immune function, no appetite, periparturient#
!$!
Journal of Japanese Society for Clinical Infections Disease
in Farm Animals Vol.4 No.1 2009