The Title Should Summarize the Main Idea of the Paper

Contributors may use this template as an example of a full-length article. Papers with different
theoretical approaches are accepted as long as they conform to the Submission Guidelines. JACET
Journal welcomes papers on studies conducted with qualitative and or quantitative approaches,
book reviews, and research notes.
論文のテンプレートを作成してみましたので参考にして下さい。ただし研究方法や章立て
は、研究の内容と質によって異なるため、『投稿規程』にのっとっている限りこのテンプ
レートと全く同じである必要はありません。JACET では様々なアプローチの質的・量的
研究、書評、及び、研究ノートを受け付けています。
The Title Should Summarize the Main Idea of the Paper Clearly and Simply
Abstract
The abstract should describe the purpose and content of the paper. Beginning with the most
important information, the abstract should include only four or five key concepts, findings, or
implications. All abbreviations and acronyms need to be defined. Every sentence should be clear
and informative. An abstract should be brief and not exceed 200 words.
Key words: learning strategies, self-access, cross-cultural communication,
independence, autonomy (no more than 5 words)
Introduction
(章立ては論文の内容に応じて変更してください)
(See p.42 of Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association, Sixth Edition）
The introduction presents the problem being investigated and describes the research approach.
When writing the introduction, the background to the study has to be described. While relevant
literature should be presented, this does not need to be an exhaustive historical review. The
intention is to show a logical continuity between earlier and current work. If controversial issues are
included, this should be done fairly.
The introduction should describe the purpose and rationale of the study. Once the research
topic and related literature have been presented, this is then followed by an explanation of the
research approach used to solve the problem.
The sections of the template that follow provide an example for a quantitative study. Whatever
research approach the author adopts, the methodology and the findings must be clearly stated.
Method
The purpose of the Method section is to describe how the study was done. Furthermore, the
description should enable readers to determine the reliability and validity of the results obtained, as
well as to replicate the study if necessary. This section is generally divided into labeled subsections,
which describe the participants or subjects, the materials, and the procedure.
Participants
A description of the research subjects is needed so that the results can be evaluated and
comparisons be made. Furthermore, the sample should be representative.
Procedures
The procedure should summarize each stage of the research project.
ICPA test. Using a simulated ICPA test with a total of 40 questions which were specifically
designed to test the students’ digital literacy levels . . .(See p.45 of APA, 6th edition)
Results
The data collected and the statistical or data analytic treatments used should be summarized in
the Results section. A description of the data should provide enough detail to warrant the
conclusions.
English test scores of the three different classes. When describing the data, it is important to
use the most appropriate medium to display the information clearly and economically. Summarizing
the results and the analysis in tables or figures is generally preferable.
100
Challenge class
(N=19)
Listening class 1
(N=20)
Listening class 2
(N=20)
Speaking class
(N=20)
89.4
Test scores
90
88.1
85.1
82.1
79.6
80
80.3
70
68.5
60
57.6
50
Pre-term exam
End-term exam
Figure 1. Comparison of English proficiency of three different classes. (See p.156 of 6th edition)
A caption is a concise explanation of the figure that is placed directly below the figure and serves as
the title of the figure. The caption serves both as an explanation of the figure and as a figure title.
When using tables or figures, it is necessary to refer to all of them in the text. Figures should
be numbered consecutively as they appear in the text.
Table 1
Comparison of Test Scores between Two Classes of Business Major
n
M
SD
p
Pre-test
Post-test
Project class
Other class
Project class
Other class
30
26
30
26
475.85
483.70
561.88
512.31
78.40
101.33
60.00
89.97
.75
.02*
Note. A general note. (See p.140 of APA 6th edition)
A specific note.
*p < .05.A probability note.
Writers may include tables and/or graphs from other sources. When creating/recreating a table
or graph based on another writer’s data, citation is required. When scanning or otherwise including
another writer’s original table or graph, however, permission must be granted by the original
publisher or author possessing the copyright.
Discussion
Once the results have been presented, these are then discussed in detail, particularly with
reference to the original research hypotheses. The Discussion section should begin with a clear
statement of support or nonsupport for the original hypotheses. It should also highlight the
importance of the findings.
Conclusion
You are encouraged to conclude your paper with commentary on the importance of your
findings. This section also describes the limitations of the study and provides suggestions for
further research.
References
予想される論文の種類別にリストを挙げてみましたので、参考にしてください。
(Authored book)
Author, A. A. (1994). Title of work. Location/City, State: Publisher.
(Edited book)
Brown, F. (Ed.). (2006). Maximize business profits through e-partnerships. Hershey, PA: IR
Press.
(Published proceedings)
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1991). A motivational approach to self: Integration in personality. In
R. Dienstbier (Ed.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation: Vol. 38. Perspectives on motivation
(pp. 237-288). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
(Unpublished doctoral dissertation or master’s theses)
Harvey, P.C. (1982). Variations on direct instruction in one third grade classroom. Unpublished
doctoral dissertation, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
(Chapter in an edited book)
Kaplan, S. (1992). Environmental preference in a knowledge-seeking, knowledge-using organism.
In J.H.Barkow, L. Cosmides, & J..Tooby (Eds.), The adapted mind: Evolutionary
psychology and the generation of culture (pp.581-589). New York: Oxford University Press.
(Journal article)
Lutz, S.L., Guthrie, J.T., & Davis, M.H. (2006). Scaffolding for engagement in elementary
school reading instruction. Journal of Educational Research, 100, 3-20.
Benson, P. (2006). Autonomy in language teaching and learning. State-of-the-art article. Language
Teaching, 40, 20-40. doi:10.1017/S026144806003958
(Instance of publication in press)
Oxford, S. (in press). Roadmap for e-commerce standardization in Korea. International Journal
of IT Standards and Standardization Research.
(Paper presented at )
Panktree, C., & Briere, J. (1991, January). Early data on the Trauma Symptom Checklist for
Children (TSC-C). Paper presented at the meeting of the American Professional Society on
the Abuse of Children, San Diego, CA.
(Proceedings in CD-ROM)
Stead, G. (2004). M-learning; try it out..Published in ICET 2004 Conference Proceedings (CDROM), Singapore, September 9-11, 2004.
(Web sites)
Paola, C & Leeder, M. (2011). Environmental dynamics: Simplicity versus complexity. Nature, 469,
38-39. doi:10.1038/469038a
Vanden Bos, G., Knapp, S., & Doe, J. (2001). Role of reference elements in the selection of
resources by psychology undergraduates. Journal of Bibliographic Research, 5, 117-123.
Retrieved October 13, 2001, from http://jbr.org/articles.html
(References to the author’s name should be blacked out as follows at the time of submission)
T. Jacet. (2009). (1991). Speaking of prosody. Theory Into Practice, 30, 165-175.
Acknowledgements
This should not be included at the time of submission.
Appendix
The APA manual (2001) suggests that it is preferable to place in an appendix material which
would seem misplaced or distracting in the main text.
日本語で原稿を提出する場合の参考文献記載方法
(1)日本語と英語の文献は別にしてまとめて下さい。
(2)日本語の文献を先に、英語の文献を後にそれぞれアルファベット順で示して下さ
い。
（日本語文献の記載例）
大学英語教育学会 (2007) 『大会参加者へのご案内大学英語教育学会』
http://www.jacet.org/2007convention/participants-j.pdf (2007 年 7 月 10 日)
大学英語教育学会授業学研究委員会(編)(2007) 『高等教育における英語授業の研究－授業
実践事例を中心に』松柏社
所正文 (1989) 「職業意識の立体構造分析に関する試論」『応用心理学研究』 No.
14, 1-11
安田三郎・海野道郎
(1977) 『社会統計学
改訂２版』
丸善

Download Report