Bildiriler Kitab II

1
Bildiriler Kitab II
Sakarya
2
No: 95
6
ISBN: 978-605-4735-23-5
VI. Ulu
:
: Emrehan
: Ebru ALBAYRAK, Murat TOPAL
-
E-posta: [email protected]
aittir.
8
indekiler/Contents
................................................................................................................................................................ 3
Bilim Kurulu ................................................................................................................................................... 5
..................................................................................................................... 7
........................................................................................................................................................ 8
,
Ahmet AKIN,
vd ................................................................................................................... 11
,
Ahmet AKIN,
vd......................................................................................................... 15
,
vd .................................................................................................................. 19
Ahmet AKIN,
n
,
, vd ....................................................................................... 23
,
vd ............................................................................................... 30
,
,
............................................................................................................................. 39
,
vd ................................................................................................... 45
Ahmet AKIN,
lirlenmesi,
................................................................................................................................. 51
,
........................................................................................................ 62
,
.............................................................................................................................................. 68
,
..................................................................................
Derslerinde Verimlilikleri,
..........................................................................................................
,
............................................................
,
.................................................................................................
76
85
91
98
,
Murat KARAMAN vd .................................................................................................................................. 104
-
,
Mustafa BAYRAKCI vd ............................................................................................................................... 111
,
........................................................................................................ 120
,
Hande POYRAZ ........................................................................................................................................... 128
15
Ahmet AKIN*
**
****
***
Handan TOPRAK
****
Banu YILDIZ****
****
Bu
eiX
o-
Deon
The Turkish Version of the Deontic Justice Scale: The Validity
and Reliability Study
Abstract
The aim of the present study is to examine the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Deontic Justice
Scale (Beugre, 2012). Participants were 366 university students. The results of confirmatory factor analysis indicated that 18 items loaded on three factors and the goodness of fit index values of the model were x
p= .00101, RMSEA= .039, CFI= .94, IFI= .95, GFI= .93, AGFI= .71, SRMR= .051. The alpha internal consistency coefficients were found .87 for overall scale and .75, .77, .85 for three subscales respectively. The corrected item-total
correlations ranged from .32 and .62. Overall findings demonstrated that Turkish version of the Deontic Justice
Scale is a valid and reliable instrument.
Keywords: Deontic justice, validity, reliability, confirmatory factor analysis.
*
-yanl
u-
y
sisteminden kay-
m2003). Immanuel Kant ise rasyonel ve evrensel bir
a-
*
[email protected]
[email protected]
z-
u-
16
er
ueddei-
mluluk
l-
ir arada huzurlu ve adalet
eopanzano, Goldman, ve Folger, 2003). Folger (1998)
Ahlaki zorunluluk alt boyutunda 8 madde, ahlaki
sorumluluk alt boyutunda 6 madde, Ahlaki
e-
m (2) Ka-
adilkik adalette bir davran
n .89, .89
Orijinal
ahlaki sorumluluk
osorlendirmede organizasyonel adaletin yani deontik
eng
Deontik
inin 3.65
ahlaki
inin 3.49
ahlaki
ve
likte toplam
(Beugre, 2012).
einin 3.03
rn-
Bulgular
Madde analizi
anan
edir.
Ar
.
aDFA
i-
u-
X
CFI= .94, IFI= .95, GFI= .93, AGFI= .71, and SRMR=
.051).
17
M1
M2
M3
M4
.16
.56
.46
M5
.79
.17
.43
M6
Ahlaki
Zorunluluk
.60
.40
.44
M7
M8
M9
M10
M11
M12
M13
M14
.44
.44
.44
.44
.59
.44
Ahlaki
.44
M15
M16
.44
M17
.37
Ahlaki
Sorumluluk
.44
.44
.44
M18
e-
a-
.
ontik adalet
u-
ormu-
-test
ee
1980).
kabul
-Engel ve
sd= 130, p= .00101, RMSEA= .039, CFI= .94, IFI= .95,
GFI= .93, AGFI= .71, and SRMR= .051) kabul edilebi-
18
Bentler, P. M. (1980). Multivariate analysis with latent variables: Causal modeling. Annual Review of Psychology, 31, 419-456.
Bentler, P. M., ve Bonet, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological
Bulletin, 88, 588-606.
Beugre, C. D. (2012). Development and Validation of a Deontic Justice Scale. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 42(9), 2163
2190.
Brown, M., ve Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In: K. A. Bollen ve J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural
equation models (s. 136-162). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Cropanzano, R., Goldman, B., ve Folger, R. (2003). Deontic justice: The role of moral principles in workplace fairness. Journal of
Organizational Behavior, 24, 1019 1024.
Folger, R. (2001). Fairness as deonance. In S. Gilliland, D. D. Steiner, ve D. Skarlicki (Eds.), Theoretical and cultural perspectives
on organizational justice (pp. 3 33). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
Folger, R., ve Cropanzano, R. (2001). Fairness theory: Justice as accountability. In J. Greenberg ve R. Cropanzano (Eds.), Advances in organizational justice (pp. 1 55). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Folger, R., Cropanzano, R., ve Goldman, B. (2005). What is the relationship between justice and morality? In J. Greenberg ve J.
A. Colquitt (Eds.), Handbook of organizational justice (pp. 215 245). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Ahlak Psikolojisi ve Sosyal Ahlak
Kant, I.(2002).
.
Etik Cogito, 41-42, 241-275.
Schermelleh-Engel, K., ve Moosbrugger, H., (2003). Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Tests of significance and
descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of Psychological Research Online, 8(2), 23-74.
A. A. (1996).
, 232-237.

Download Report