Indian Journ al of Pure & Applied Physics Vol. 4 1. May 2003, pp. 350-353 Crystal structure of tetrakis (imidazole) copper(ll) bromide (CuBr2 C 12 Ns Hu) Pratyush Purkayastha, B K Sanna & AN Talukdar Department of Physics. Gauhati University, Guwahati , Assam 78 1 014 Received 20 December 2002; accepted 14 March 2003 The crystal and molecular structure of tetrakis imidazole copper (II ) bromide (C uBr2C 12 NxH12 ) has heen in vesti gated from three-dimensional intensity data. The two imidazole rings bonded to the central Cu atom throu gh the respective N atom. which constitutes one-half of the asymmetric unit of the centrosymmetric structure under consideration . The distance between Cu-Br- ion is found to be 3.376{1)A which excludes the possibility of formation of any covalent bond between them. [Keywords: Crystal structure, Tetrakis imidazole copper bromide, Biological membrane. Biopolymer) 1 Introduction 2 Experimental Details The determination of crystal structure has been considered owing to the presence of th e imidazole en tity in the variety of biologically important substances, notably as part of the a mino acid hi stidine and metabolites like histamine u . Involvement of imidazolium cations is even implicated in proton translocation in biological membranes 1 and also in electrostatic interactions in biopolymers 4 . In addition, mixed ligand imidazole copper(II) complexes have been shown to exhibit antitumour', superoxide dismutase6·7 and catecholase activiti.The structural formu la of the compound (I) is as follows: ++ The crystals of tetraki s (im idazo le) copper(II) bromide were grown by the reaction of CuO.nH 20 and imidazole with the add ition of co ncentrated HBr. The slow evaporation of the resulting solution yields the crystal of [Cu(Hlm) 4 Br:] where Him means imidazole. Pre limin ary oscillation and Weissenberg photographs indicated a triclinic crystal system with no systematic absences consistent with the space group P I . Table I shows the experimental data . The unit cell parameters were refined by the leastsquare refinement method on the basi s of 25 hi gh angle reflections with the setting angles lying in the range 10 °~ 8 ~ 20°. Data were recorded up to 75 ° in 28 by the (J}-28 scan technique. The inte nsities were corrected for the Lorentz and polarization factors and also for absorption. 3 Structure Solution and Refinement .2Br (I ) The structure was solved by Patterson methods using the program SHELXS-93 ~. The structure refinement based on F was carried out usi ng the program SHELXL-93 111 • Full matrix least squares refinement, first with isotropic and the n with anisotropic thermal parameters were carri ed out. The Cu atom sits on special position (0.5, 0.5 , 0.0) with occupancy of 0.5. All the hydrogen atoms we re generated, using ridin g mode l and the ir positional PURKAYASTHA et a/.: CRYSTAL STRUCTURE OF CuBr 2C 12 NxH 12 and the rmal parame te rs were refined . The fin al agreeme nt res idu a l arrived at R = 0 .0600 for 3202 refl ecti ons wi th F > 4cr (F.,) and wR = 0 . 1733. The fun cti on was minimized with we ight w =I I [sigma' (F 112) + (0 . 141 4 * Pf + I .64* P] where P =[ M ax (F112 , 0 )+ 2* Fc 2 ] /3 . T he fin a l d iffe rence Fouri e r map showed peaks lyin g in the range from 0 .70 to -0.6 1 eA·-' . Th e atomi c scattering facto rs used were taken from the In tern ati ona l T abl es fo r X-ray crysta llograph y. Th e molecul ar geo metry calculati ons for the present structure were carried out , usin g th e program PARST 11 • The fin a l fracti ona l atomi c coordin ates and equi va le nt isotropi c the rmal para mete rs for a ll non-hydrogen ato ms are given in Tab le 2 . T ab le I - Exr eri ment::t l data Mo lecu lar formula M olecul ar weight (M ,.) C ry~ t a l sy stem Space group CuBr 2C 12 N xH 12 49 1.4 Tric lin ic Un it ce ll di mensions h = 8.650( I lA c = I H >37(5lA a= 95 .938 (2) 0 ~ = I 04. 162(W y = 117.090(4) 0 V olume a = 8.640( I lA z 2 Ca lcul ated densi ty D , Radiati on Wave length Absorptio n cocfficielll F t 000) Tempera ture Goodness-of- ti t ·s· 1.9 11 M g/ m' Cu-Ku 1.54 18 A 7.38 mm- 1 478 293( 2) K 0.966 0. 0600 0. 70 eA-' -0 .6 1 eA- 3 0.059 /? I'.Pmax. !!J.plllltl. ( t. I cr l "'·"· 35 1 pl anes through the ato ms of th e imidazole rin gs , it is seen that, the maximum dev iati o ns of th e ato ms of both the rings li e in the ran ge from -0 .009(9)A to + 0 .009 ( 12)A. The centra l Cu ato m dev iates fro m the first imidazole mean plane [N 1-C I-N2-C2-C3] onl y by -0.002(l )A and that fro m the seco nd mean plane [N3-C4-N4-C5-C6] is 0 .030( I )A. Thi s shows th at the two imid azo le ring pl anes are pl anar individua ll y. A ll the fiv e e ndocyc lic bo nd length s and bond ang les of the imidazo le rin gs of the present structure are a lmo st normal. The ave rage va lues fo r C = C , C = N and C-C are 1.375 ( 15)A, 1.3 17( 15 )A and 1.366( 18)A, respecti ve ly. Th ese va lues are in good agree ment with the corresponding va lues in the structure of I -trity l-4-nitroimidazo le 1 \ transbi s-(imid azo le-N 3) bis(cyanaimid onitro-N:O) coppe r(II) 14 , cantena-po ly [[tetraki s( imid azo le-N-')co ppe r(Il)]-J..l-( di c hro mato-0 :0 ') ] 1\ imidazo le-4acetic ac id mono hydrate 11' a nd o th e r vari ous imidazo le de ri vatives 15· 17- 211 • PI T able 2 Fractio nal ato mi c coordin ates and equ ivalent isotropi c th ermal parameters (A 2 ) for non -hydrogen atoms with esd ' s i n parentheses A to1h 654 35(3l A' 4 Res ults and Discussion ORT EP 12 ~ b ow in g the T he di agra m co nfo rmati o n of the mo lec ul es a nd rh e ato m nu mbe rin g scheme w ith th erma l e llipsoi ds is g ive n in Fig . I. T he re are two im idazo le rin gs bonded to the ce nt ral C u ato m of the mo lecu le unde r conside rat ion. From the analysi . of the least squares Cu i Br l Nl N2 NJ 4 Cl C2 C3 C4 C5 C6 X y 7 0.5000(0) 0. 1349 ( 1) 0 578 8( 12) 0.5H65 ( 19) 0.6595( I I ) 0 757 1( 1H) 0.4871 ( 16) 0.7370( 12) 0. 7 182( 18) 0.6270( 17) 0 8785 ( 13) 0.8 149( I 7) 0.5000(0) 0.35H I ( I ) 0.75 52(9 ) 1.0041 ( 13 ) 0.4975(9) 0.4927( 14) 0.82 13( 13) 1.0457( 10) 0.8872( 15) 0.4955( 12) 0.4895( I I ) 0.495 1( 13) 0.0000( 0 ) 0.0854( I ) 0.0590(5) 0. 135 0(9) 0. 1323(5) 0. 2994(8) 0. 1050(H) 0 I OSl:\( 7) 0.0579(9) 0.2264(7) 0 249X(7) 0. 1499(8) * U eq U,-q I .. * * = :(Ii I .I· u IJl.J (l. (/ 0.05 36(7) 0.0436(4) 0 0393( 16) 0.0696(29) 0. 0398( 16) 0 0707(30 ) 005 14(24) 0.0379( 18) 0.0532(26) 0 0497(23) 0 04 14( 19) 0 05 24(2 4) ·(/ · {/ . l .J In the ana lys is, it has been o bserved that, the C u(JI) atom sits o n a spec ial pos iti o n (0 .5 . 0 .5, 0.0) with th e occupanc y o f 0 .5 and are linked to two imidazo le nitrogen ato ms in o ne-h a lf of the asy mmetric un it [va lu es fo r C u-N I and C u- N2 are 1.995(8)A and I .996(8)A, respec ti ve ly] sh owin g perfect square p lanar co nfi gurati o n. T hus, th e coordi natio n sph e re of th e C u(ll) ato m is in a sq uare planar arran geme nt. T he N ato ms of the im idazo le 352 INDIAN J PURE & APPL PHYS , VOL 4 1, MAY 2003 li gand and the Cu(II) atom are a lmost copl a nar. The Cu-N dista nces and N- Cu-N ang les [90 .2(3t] agree we ll wi th the corresponding mean geo metry in othe r Cu(II) compl exes wi th unide ntate or bide ntate N-donor li gands 2 1·D a nd al so other related structures 1' · 17 • 1x. 0 th e dihedral ang le betwee n the planes defin ed by the atoms N I to C3 and N3 to C6 be ing 90. 9( 4 t. ~ Brl Fig. 2 - Packi ng o r the molec ul es in the unit cell as viewed down th e c-axis Fig. I - Mo lecu lar stru cture or the titl e co mpo und showing the atomic numbering scheme (Displacement ellipsoid s are dra wn at th e 50 % probab ilit y level and H ato ms are shown as small cin.: les or an arbitrary radiu s) The Br- ion does not form any cova lent bond . The distance be tween Cu-Br- ion is found to be 3.376( I )A whic h exc ludes the possibility of formation of any cova le nt bond be tween the m. An inspecti on of the mo lecul ar geo me try revealed th at, th e re are short contacts between the two Br- ions with the two aromatic hydrogen atoms and thu s the mol ec ul e stabili zes in the crysta lline space. It has bee n observed that, both th e imidazole rings are a lmost planar and are perpendicular to each other, From the study of the tors ion ang les about various bonds in the present structure, it is found that, th e dev iati ons from pl ana rity are ve ry sma ll. The va lue of th e torsion ang les o f both the imidazole rin gs a re nea rl y the sa me, i.e. it vari es from -2.3( I ) 0 to 3.2( I ) 0 in the ring I- C3 and 3. 1(2t to 1.5( It in the ring N3- C6. T he sa me type of vari at ion of torsion ang les is a lso found in the of N,N '-bi s( l -methyli midazo le-2y lstru cture methyl )- l ,3-diaminopropane-2-oF 4 and 1-benzy l-2(2,6-dichloroani linomethyl )- 1H-be nzimidazo le 25 . The torsion angles N 1-Cu I-N3-C4 = 72 .9(9) 0 and NI-Cui-N3- C6 = -108 .1 (9t , as also th e torsion ang les N3-Cu 1- N I-C3=85 .2( It a nd N3 Cu 1- N 1-C I = -97 .7(9t bea r ev ide nce that , th e two imi dazo le rin g planes are tra nsve rse to eac h othe r. The pack in g diagram of the mo lec ul es in the c rys ta lline space as viewed down the c-ax is o f the unit ce ll is depicted in Fig. 2. There is no intra or intermol ecular hydrogen bond tn the centrosy mmetri c structure but, there ex ist short con tacts less than 3A between the Br- ion a nd the PURKA YASTHA et al.: CRYSTAL STRUCTURE OF CuBr2C 12NxH12 two aromatic hydrogen atoms. Th e detail s of the sho rt contact geometry are as follows : Br ---- C2ci> 3.370(9)A , Br ---- H2<i> 2.543( I O)A and Br ---- H2ci> - C2<i> 148 .9(9) 0 [Symmetry code (i) x + I , y + I , z] and Br ---- C3<ii> 3 .573( 17)A, Br ---H3<ii> 2.786(16)A and Br ----H3<ii) - C2cii> 143 .0( 1) 0 [Symmetry code (i i) -x+ I , -y+ I , -z]. It is to be noted th at, the two Br----C di stances 3.370(9)A and 3.573( 17)A of the present structure are intermediate values and can be compared with th ose observed in several imidazole structures 26 . 5 Acknowledgement The authors thank Dr C R Bhattacharj ee, Department of Chemistry, Assam University , Silchar, for suppl yin g the c rysta l sample and De partment of Biophys ics, All Indi a In stitute of Medical Sciences, New De lhi, for diffractome te r data collection. References Kurd ziel K . Glowiak T & Jezierska J, J Chem Soc, Dalton Trans, (2000) I 095. 2 M endoza-Di az G, Driessen W L & Reed ijk J, Acta Cryst, C52 ( 1996) 960. 3 Zundel G & Widemann E G, Proc First Eur Biophysics Cong,re.u, Vienna, ( 197 1) 43. 4 Reinert K E, Pruc XXIII/nt em ationai/ UPAC Boston. (1971) 1249. 5 Tamura H. l mai H, Huwahara J & Sguira Y , J Am Chem Sue . I 09 ( 1987) 6870. 6 Bhirud R G & Srivas tava T S, ln org Chim Acta , 173 ( 1990) 12 1. 7 Bienvenue E. Chona S, Lobo-Recio M A, Marzin C, Pacheco P, Seta P & T arrago G, J lnorg Biuchem, 57 ( 1995) 157. 8 C01~{eren ce, Abu hijlch A L , Woods C, Bogas E & L eGuenniou G, 353 lnorg Chim Acta, 67 ( 1992) 195. 9 Sheldriek G M , SHEU(S93, Program for th e so!uti011 of crystal structures, (U niversity of Gottingen, Germany). 1993. 10 Sheldrick G M , SHELXL97, Program fur th e re.finement of Clystal structures, (U niversity of Gottingen, Germany). 1993. II Nardelli M , Cumput Che111 , 7 ( 1983) 95. 12 Joh nson C K , ORTEP/1, Report ORNL - 5 138. Oak Ri dge National Laboratory, Tennessee, USA, 1976. 13 Skrzypczak-Jankun E & Ku rumbai l G, Acta Crvst , C52 ( 1996) 189. 14 Kozi sek J, Diaz J G. Hvastijova M & Jager L , Acta Cn·st. C53 ( 1997) 703. 15 Pan L , Zhen g N, Zhou X. Wu Y, Wu Q & Jin X. Acta Cryst, C54 ( 1998) 1802. 16 Okabe N & Hayashi T, Acta Cryst, C55 ( 1999) I 142. 17 Bohen F M , Goddard R. Mindis A B E. Alexakis A & Pfaltz A, Acta Cryst , C53 ( 1997) 11 42. Us Bhadbhade M M & Sures h E, Acta Crrst. C53 ( 1997) 422. 19 Zhang C, Sun J, Kong X & Z hao C, Acta Clyst, C55 ( 1999) 873. 20 Kubi ck i M , Borowick T, Suwinski J & Wagner P, Acw Cryst , C57 (200 I ) I 06. 2 1 Munno G D, Julve M , Nicolo F, Lloret F, Gaus J. Rui z R & Sinn E, Angew Chem /111 Ed Eng /, 32 ( 1993) 61 3. 22 Su C C, Liu Y L , Liu S J & Chang T H, Polvh edron. 12 ( 1993) 2687. 23 Allen F H & Kenn ard 0 , Chem Des A utom News, 8 ( 1993 ) 31. 24 l vo V, Ademir C54 ( 1998) 97 . 25 Engin K , Suheyla 0, M eral T & Haken G, Acta Crvst , C54 ( 1998) 854. 26 Hensen K , Kettner M & Bo lte M , Acta Cn·st , C54 ( 199X ) 13 12. , Marceiela S & Yaldir R C. Acta Crrst.
© Copyright 2024 Paperzz