Status and future of measuring the CP angle at Babar Jeroen van Hunen (Babar plots: Max Baak , NIKHEF) Some decay modes to access • 0 B (B ) D 0 (*) π sin(2+) hep:ex/309017 (fully reconstructed) and 307036 (partially rec.) • B DCP K Theoretically clean, but the 2 triangles of the 6 decay amplitudes are squashed since 0 B D K is suppressed with respect to B D 0 K • B ππ, πK, K K Theoretical uncertainties: FSI, SU(3)-breaking corrections, etc. • and others…………… Jeroen van Hunen CERN B-Journal Club October 3, 2003 2 0 The B (B ) D(*) h decay mode 0 V* d ud c b B 0 Vcb h d Vcd u u b * B D 0 c V*ub d d D* 0 B0 and B both decay into D(*)-h h h = , , a1 Interference between the mixing and the decay Large BR, but: Vub* Vcd r 0.02 * VcbVud Interference is tiny No penguin pollution, theoretically clean Jeroen van Hunen CERN B-Journal Club October 3, 2003 3 The angle q Af f p Af D (* ) q AD(* ) p AD(* ) Vtb*Vtd i VubVcd* i ( ( 2 )) e r e VtbVtd* Vcb*Vud 1 2 2 (arg arg ) mixing term D (*) p AD(*) q AD(*) Jeroen van Hunen VtbVtd* i VcbVud* 1 i ( ( 2 )) * e e * VubVcd r VtbVtd CERN B-Journal Club October 3, 2003 4 0 The B (B ) D(*) h decay rates 0 4 decay rates, for example: B0 D f (t ) S 2( ) 1 2 C t e 1 S sin md t C cosmd t 4 t trec ttag 2 1 r 1 r2 Vub* Vcd r 0.02 * VcbVud Fit the 4 decay rates with the data to obtain and thus sin(2+) , but the value of r is unknown (not enough statistics to fit it together with ). Jeroen van Hunen CERN B-Journal Club October 3, 2003 5 The value for r Temporary solution: With SU(3) symmetry relation determine r from the branching fractions for B0 Ds π and B0 D- π. This gives: r 0.019 0.004 and r * 0.017 00..005 007 Add additional theoretical uncertainty of 30% on validity of SU(3) symmetry In future (statistical errors on measurements reduced) improvement is needed: • theoretical models ~ 20% spread • other options? (no solution yet) Jeroen van Hunen CERN B-Journal Club October 3, 2003 6 0 The results for B (B ) D(*) π full reconstruction 0 Jeroen van Hunen CERN B-Journal Club October 3, 2003 7 The t distribution Jeroen van Hunen CERN B-Journal Club October 3, 2003 8 The Measurements The results of the Babar fit : (*) 2r sin( 2 ) cos (*) 2 cos(2 )r sin a c (*) (*) (*) (*) If become smaller value of r is problem Jeroen van Hunen CERN B-Journal Club October 3, 2003 9 Interpretation : what is sin(2+) ~ xi xi (r (*) ) i i 2 * with : ~ xi a, a* , clep , clep xi eq. for , , 68% CL : |sin(2+)|>0.69 (43<2+<137) Probabilistic interpretation: simulate (many) experiments with characteristics as data for many sin(2+) values, and count number of experiments where 2(sin(2+)- 2min is smaller then the data 83% CL : |sin(2+)|>0 (at 98% CL for partial reco) sin(2+) 1 sine not very dependent on 2+ (Bd : sin(2) 0.7 , but for Bs the phase s very small (with BsDsK we measure s + ) Jeroen van Hunen CERN B-Journal Club October 3, 2003 10 The Measurements Full and partial reconstruction combined (roughly same precision) If sin(2+) 0.94 continue setting lower limits If sin(2+) < 0.75 (but excluded at 60% CL) not good for SM Jeroen van Hunen CERN B-Journal Club October 3, 2003 11 The future No error on r included : 82fb-1 Current Summer 2007 : 500fb-1 Summer 2009 : 1000fb-1 Thus: Summer 2007 : err*0.4 Summer 2009 : err*0.3 68% CL |sin(2+)|>0.92 (67 <2+<113) Jeroen van Hunen CERN B-Journal Club October 3, 2003 12 Some conclusions 0 • B0 (B ) D(*) π now : • Full reco = at 68% CL |sin(2+)|>0.69 (43<2+<137) • Partial reco = at 90% CL |sin(2+)|>0.75 • B (B ) D(*) π in 2009 : 0 0 • full reco = at 68% CL |sin(2+)|>0.92 ? (67 <2+<113) (but no error on r included!) • partial reco similar/better • Other modes will improve the results (how much?) Jeroen van Hunen CERN B-Journal Club October 3, 2003 13
© Copyright 2024 Paperzz