Status and future of measuring the CP angle  at Babar Jeroen van Hunen (Babar plots: Max Baak , NIKHEF) Some decay modes to access  • 0 B (B )  D 0 (*) π   sin(2+) hep:ex/309017 (fully reconstructed) and 307036 (partially rec.) • B  DCP K   Theoretically clean, but the 2 triangles of the 6 decay amplitudes are squashed since 0 B  D K  is suppressed with respect to B  D 0 K  • B  ππ, πK, K K   Theoretical uncertainties: FSI, SU(3)-breaking corrections, etc. • and others…………… Jeroen van Hunen CERN B-Journal Club October 3, 2003 2 0 The B (B )  D(*) h decay mode 0 V* d ud c b B 0 Vcb h d Vcd  u u b * B D 0 c V*ub d d   D*  0 B0 and B both decay into D(*)-h  h  h = , , a1  Interference between the mixing and the decay Large BR, but: Vub* Vcd r  0.02 * VcbVud  Interference is tiny No penguin pollution, theoretically clean Jeroen van Hunen CERN B-Journal Club October 3, 2003 3 The angle  q Af f  p Af D (* )    q  AD(* )      p  AD(* )    Vtb*Vtd  i VubVcd* i (   ( 2   ))   e  r e   VtbVtd*  Vcb*Vud    1 2   2  (arg   arg  ) mixing term D (*)    p  AD(*)      q  AD(*)  Jeroen van Hunen   VtbVtd*  i VcbVud* 1 i ( ( 2   ))    *  e  e * VubVcd r   VtbVtd  CERN B-Journal Club October 3, 2003 4 0 The B (B )  D(*) h decay rates 0 4 decay rates, for example: B0  D    f (t )  S 2( ) 1  2 C  t  e 1  S sin md t   C cosmd t  4 t  trec  ttag 2 1 r 1 r2 Vub* Vcd r  0.02 * VcbVud Fit the 4 decay rates with the data to obtain  and thus sin(2+) , but the value of r is unknown (not enough statistics to fit it together with ). Jeroen van Hunen CERN B-Journal Club October 3, 2003 5 The value for r Temporary solution: With SU(3) symmetry relation determine r from the branching fractions for B0  Ds π  and B0  D- π. This gives: r  0.019  0.004 and r *  0.017 00..005 007 Add additional theoretical uncertainty of 30% on validity of SU(3) symmetry In future (statistical errors on measurements reduced) improvement is needed: • theoretical models ~ 20% spread • other options? (no solution yet) Jeroen van Hunen CERN B-Journal Club October 3, 2003 6 0 The results for B (B )  D(*) π  full reconstruction 0 Jeroen van Hunen CERN B-Journal Club October 3, 2003 7 The t distribution Jeroen van Hunen CERN B-Journal Club October 3, 2003 8 The Measurements The results of the Babar fit : (*)  2r sin( 2   ) cos  (*)  2 cos(2   )r sin  a c (*) (*) (*) (*) If become smaller value of r is problem Jeroen van Hunen CERN B-Journal Club October 3, 2003 9 Interpretation : what is sin(2+) ~ xi  xi     (r (*) )    i  i  2 * with : ~ xi  a, a* , clep , clep xi  eq. for  ,  ,  68% CL : |sin(2+)|>0.69 (43<2+<137) Probabilistic interpretation: simulate (many) experiments with characteristics as data for many sin(2+) values, and count number of experiments where 2(sin(2+)- 2min is smaller then the data 83% CL : |sin(2+)|>0 (at 98% CL for partial reco) sin(2+) 1  sine not very dependent on 2+ (Bd : sin(2)  0.7 , but for Bs the phase s very small (with BsDsK we measure s + ) Jeroen van Hunen CERN B-Journal Club October 3, 2003 10 The Measurements Full and partial reconstruction combined (roughly same precision) If sin(2+)  0.94  continue setting lower limits If sin(2+) < 0.75 (but excluded at 60% CL)  not good for SM Jeroen van Hunen CERN B-Journal Club October 3, 2003 11 The future No error on r included : 82fb-1 Current Summer 2007 : 500fb-1 Summer 2009 : 1000fb-1 Thus: Summer 2007 : err*0.4 Summer 2009 : err*0.3 68% CL |sin(2+)|>0.92 (67 <2+<113) Jeroen van Hunen CERN B-Journal Club October 3, 2003 12 Some conclusions 0 • B0 (B )  D(*) π  now : • Full reco = at 68% CL |sin(2+)|>0.69 (43<2+<137) • Partial reco = at 90% CL |sin(2+)|>0.75 • B (B )  D(*) π  in 2009 : 0 0 • full reco = at 68% CL |sin(2+)|>0.92 ? (67 <2+<113) (but no error on r included!) • partial reco similar/better • Other modes will improve the results (how much?) Jeroen van Hunen CERN B-Journal Club October 3, 2003 13
© Copyright 2025 Paperzz