Public Mental Health Seminar Dec 2012 Promoting Well

Public Mental Health Seminar
Dec 2012
Promoting Well-being
at Population Level
Sarah Stewart-Brown
Professor of Public Health
Percent of people (18-64yrs) reporting
Problems with Work or Other Regular Daily Activity
(SF-36) over 4 wks
16
14
12
10
8
%
6
4
2
0
Physical
health
Emotional
health
Both
Postal questionnaire survey of 9332 adults in old Oxford Region
Stewart-Brown S, Layte R. J Epid Comm Health 1997
•What is mental wellbeing
•Measurement
•Universal vs targeted approaches
•Determining determinants
•Determining the evidence base
What is Wellbeing?
Mental
Social
Physical
Spiritual
Internal vs External
Subjective vs Objective
Contributions
• Philosophers
– Western: Aristotle, Epicurus
– Eastern: Buddhism, Hindu, Islam
• Psychologists
– Psychological functioning,
– Positive psychology
– Flourishing
Wellbeing is something that is
cultivated by the individual
Psychological Wellbeing (Eudaemonic)
Functioning well /flourishing
•
•
•
•
•
•
Self acceptance
Personal growth
Purpose in life
Environmental mastery
Autonomy
Positive relations with others
Ryff 1995
Contributions
• Social Scientists
Wellbeing is something that is
determined by social conditions
– GDP
– Income, wealth, poverty
– Government
– Services
• Education
• Health
• Social
Subjective Wellbeing (Hedonic)
feeling good/happiness/
affective well-being
• Feeling good
• Life satisfaction
• Happiness
Diener 1993
Both matter
Internal
states
External
conditions
Both matter
Functioning
Feeling
Measurement
The Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale
(WEMWBS)
STATEMENTS
None of Rarely Some of Often All of
the time
the time
the time
I’ve been feeling optimistic about the future
I’ve been feeling useful
I’ve been feeling relaxed
I’ve been feeling interested in other people
I’ve had energy to spare
I’ve been dealing with problems well
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
I’ve been thinking clearly
I’ve been feeling good about myself
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
I’ve been feeling close to other people
1
2
3
4
5
I’ve been feeling confident
I’ve been able to make up my own mind
about things
I’ve been feeling loved
I’ve been interested in new things
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
I’ve been feeling cheerful
1
2
3
4
5
WEMWBS vs CESD-D
Pearson correlation .842
Distribution of WEMWBS scores: student
and population samples
Student sample: median score: 50
Population sample: median score: 51
Office of National Statistics Approach
• Overall how satisfied are you with your
life nowadays?
• Overall how happy did you feel
yesterday ?
• Overall how anxious did you feel
yesterday ?
• Overall, to what extent do you feel things
you do in your life are worthwhile ?
Positive or Negative
• Great majority of measures of mental health
focus on the negative/ disease / distress
• Focusing on the positive is an intervention in its
own right.
– ‘What you pay attention to is what you get
more of’
• Public and patients prefer positive measures
Crawford et al. Selecting outcome measures in mental
health. J. Mental Health 2011(20)336-346
Distribution of WEMWBS scores: student
and population samples
Student sample: median score: 50
Population sample: median score: 51
Distribution is not bimodal
Number of
people
Mental Illness
Mental Wellbeing
Disease prevention is problematical
Number of
people
Mental Illness
Mental Wellbeing
Universal and targeted
Number of
people
Mental Illness
Mental wellbeing
Determinants
Regression analyses
•
Are best suited to investigations where
there is a single determinant causing a
single disease.
Are not well suited to estimating effects in
•
–
–
–
complex causal pathways or when
several different agents or conditions interact
together to create the conditions for disease
examining holistic effects
Mental Health and Social Inequalities
Mental health problems
Physical health problems
Relationship problems
Poverty, income inequality
Friedli Lynne. Mental health, resilience and inequalities WHO Euro 2009
Life Satisfaction and GDP in the UK 1973-2011
By Kind Permission of Ewen Mckinnon Cabinet Office Nov 2012
A systems approach
Parent
Infant
Adult
Your mental
wellbeing
you
My mental
wellbeing
community
Remediable Determinants
•
Parenting
–
–
–
•
Emotional trauma /threat
–
–
–
–
•
Parental mental illness
Parental drug and alcohol misuse
Child abuse, looked after children
Bullying
Conflict
Social exclusion – deprivation, debt, income
inequality, racism, homphobia
Bereavement
Drug and alcohol misuse
Returns to a Unit Pound Invested
. Heckman J, Schools, skills and synapses. Economic Inquiry 46(3), 2008, 289-324.
27
Targeting and
The population paradox
Proportion of children 5-10 years with
antisocial behaviour
14
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
I
II
IINM
IIIM
IV
V
NW
From: Mental health of children and adolescents in Great Britain
Meltzer H. Gatward R. 1999 ONS, London The Stationary Office ONS
Children 5-10 years
Numbers with antisocial behaviour by social class
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
I
II
IINM
IIIM
IV
V
NW
From mental health of children and adolescents in great Britain
Meltzer H. Gatward R. 1999 ONS, London The Stationary Office ONS
CAMs are not well suited to RCTs
• RCTs unlikely to engage those most likely to
benefit
• Interventions cannot be standardised
(pragmatic trials possible)
• Placebo control is an issue
• Disease based outcome measures will miss
much important benefit
What can be done ?
Protective Factors
•
Good parenting
–
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Resilience
Relationship skills
Social capital
Exercise
Diet
Mindfulness / spiritual development
Green spaces
Creative arts
Programmes
•
Parenting programmes
– Pregnancy and infancy
– Behaviour
– Teenage
•
School based programmes
–
–
•
•
Workplace programmes
Wellness programmes
–
•
•
Relationship skills
Bullying
Diet, exercise,
Community development, volunteering,
arts/gardening for health,
CBT, EMDR, Mindfulness, EFT?
Summing Up
•
•
It is complex
No simple answers
– Evidence base cannot rely on RCTs
– Targeting is inefficient
– No simple prioritising
– Everything is connected
• Know your locality
• Build on what is working
• Magic can happen